Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-25 Thread RedHog (Egil Möller)

A friend of mine had the same probl. A partition-table that linux
fdisk (and linux!) reads fine is told to be defect/unreadable by the
installation partitioning program. If he switched to the command-line
and atempted to mount the partitions or use fdisk, it worked fine...

-- 
MandrakeSoftBr
A Href="http://mini.dhs.org/PGP%20Public%20key.asc"PGP Public key/ABr
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-16 Thread Pixel

Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Well that did it.. Can you fix that for users during install?

ok, i'm going to release a patch that'll be available at
mandrake.com/en/ulysseslast.php3 (not there yet)

and a new ISO will be available when KDE2 is out with this fixed (along with
ide-burners pb)

[...]

   Also console 3 shows: found empty partition table on /dev/hdd at sector 0
   Bad magic number /usr/bin/perl-install/partition_table_empty.pm line 31
 
  solution: hexedit /dev/hdd and put FF at the beginning.
  (or any little random at the beginning you can think ok :)


thanks, cu Pixel.




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-15 Thread Pixel

Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Here you go.. /dev/hdd is the problem drive..
 Also console 3 shows: found empty partition table on /dev/hdd at sector 0
 Bad magic number /usr/bin/perl-install/partition_table_empty.pm line 31

solution: hexedit /dev/hdd and put FF at the beginning.
(or any little random at the beginning you can think ok :)





Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-15 Thread Ray

I forgot to thank you.

On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Here you go.. /dev/hdd is the problem drive..
  Also console 3 shows: found empty partition table on /dev/hdd at sector 0
  Bad magic number /usr/bin/perl-install/partition_table_empty.pm line 31

 solution: hexedit /dev/hdd and put FF at the beginning.
 (or any little random at the beginning you can think ok :)




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-14 Thread Ray

This is an ongoing problem nad still is not fixed..
The same problem happens on RH7






On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 On today's 7.2beta install, diskdrake is unable to detect partitions on
 my IDE drives (primary and secondary) the SCSI drives are detected fine,
 however.  The partition tables were created using fdisk on mandrake
 7.1.  These same IDE partitions, however, can be seen with no problem in
 fdisk once linux is installed.




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-14 Thread Pixel

Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This is an ongoing problem nad still is not fixed..
 The same problem happens on RH7

?? what causes the pb? special hardware? is the kernel reading the partition
table or is it a DrakX pb?

[...]

 On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
  On today's 7.2beta install, diskdrake is unable to detect partitions on
  my IDE drives (primary and secondary) the SCSI drives are detected fine,
  however.  The partition tables were created using fdisk on mandrake
  7.1.  These same IDE partitions, however, can be seen with no problem in
  fdisk once linux is installed.




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-14 Thread Ray

The problem is drakx.. Fdisk reads the drive fine and the OS sees it fine 
after install. I can mount it without any problem but drakx still can't see 
it. I use the same drive with same partition with 7.1 and it works fine. Same 
with RH 6.x worked fine but duing the install of 7.0 I had the same problem.
This is a Quantum CR13.0A drive. 1528 cyl 255 heads 63 secs. I will help with 
what ever I can... Here is the fdisk info.
So I just run the install without partitioning this drive and after setup I 
just add it to fstab. I don't know why this happens on RH7 and Mandrake 7.2



The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 25228.
There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
and could in certain setups cause problems with:
1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., old versions of LILO)
2) booting and partitioning software from other OSs
   (e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK)
 
Command (m for help): p
 
Disk /dev/hdd: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 25228 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes
 
   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/hdd1   * 1 24380  12287488+  83  Linux
/dev/hdd2 24381 252284273925  Extended
/dev/hdd5 24381 25228427360+  82  Linux swap
 
Command (m for help): 


On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  This is an ongoing problem nad still is not fixed..
  The same problem happens on RH7

 ?? what causes the pb? special hardware? is the kernel reading the
 partition table or is it a DrakX pb?

 [...]

  On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
   On today's 7.2beta install, diskdrake is unable to detect partitions on
   my IDE drives (primary and secondary) the SCSI drives are detected
   fine, however.  The partition tables were created using fdisk on
   mandrake 7.1.  These same IDE partitions, however, can be seen with no
   problem in fdisk once linux is installed.




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-14 Thread Pixel

Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 The problem is drakx.. Fdisk reads the drive fine and the OS sees it fine 
 after install. I can mount it without any problem but drakx still can't see 

wait, i think i've found. Do you have the 256 first bytes of your drive blank?

i made an error for the detection of empty partition having 256 instead of 512
:-(

can you mail me the report.bug? 
to get it:

switch to console 2
put a fat floppy in floppy drive
and type "bug"

- it will put report.bug on floppy  and this file interests me :)


thanks, cu Pixel.




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-14 Thread Ron Stodden

Ray wrote:
 
 The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 25228.
 There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
 and could in certain setups cause problems with:
 1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., old versions of LILO)
 2) booting and partitioning software from other OSs
(e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK)

See the conflict with your earlier statement:

 This is a Quantum CR13.0A drive. 1528 cyl 255 heads 63 secs

No disk can have two values for number of cylinders!

It seems that this drive has never been set up with Logical Block
Addressing (LBA).   You need that with disks this large (over 1024
cylinders).

The only way I know to set it up LBA on an existing used disk
involves:

Copying all partitions you want to save off to another drive

Deleting ALL the partitions on this disk, primary, logical and
extended.

Reboot the machine intercepting the BIOS with DEL.

Get the BIOS to redetect all the hard disks, taking care to set this
one to LBA.  The drive itself will now remember that it is LBA and
always report 255 sectors and 63 heads from now on.

Use your partitioning utility to set up 3 primary partitions of
minimum size, unformatted.  If you run Windows from this disk, make
the first unformatted and big enough for that.

Create an extended partition over the entire remainder of the disk.

Copy back all the saved partitions.  You will have to delete the new
Windows partition to release the primary space for the Windows
partition copy back.

-- 
Regards,

Ron. [AU]




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-14 Thread Ray

Here you go.. /dev/hdd is the problem drive..
Also console 3 shows: found empty partition table on /dev/hdd at sector 0
Bad magic number /usr/bin/perl-install/partition_table_empty.pm line 31

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, you wrote:
 Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  The problem is drakx.. Fdisk reads the drive fine and the OS sees it
  fine after install. I can mount it without any problem but drakx still
  can't see

 wait, i think i've found. Do you have the 256 first bytes of your drive
 blank?

 i made an error for the detection of empty partition having 256 instead of
 512

 :-(

 can you mail me the report.bug?
 to get it:

 switch to console 2
 put a fat floppy in floppy drive
 and type "bug"

 - it will put report.bug on floppy  and this file interests me :)


 thanks, cu Pixel.




* lspci

 Intel Corporation|440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge (unknown ignore)
 Intel Corporation|440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX AGP bridge (unknown ignore)
 Intel Corporation|82371AB PIIX4 ISA (unknown unknown)
 Intel Corporation|82371AB PIIX4 IDE (STORAGE_IDE unknown)
 Intel Corporation|82371AB PIIX4 USB (SERIAL_USB usb-uhci)
 Intel Corporation|82371AB PIIX4 ACPI (unknown unknown)
 Intel Corporation|82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (NETWORK_ETHERNET eepro100) 
SubVendor=0x8086 SubDevice=0x0009
 Adaptec|AIC-7881U (STORAGE_SCSI aic7xxx)
 ATI|3D Rage Pro AGP 1X/2X (DISPLAY_VGA Card:ATI Mach64) SubVendor=0x1002 
SubDevice=0x0061


* pci_devices

808671900   f808

0008808671910   

0038808671100   

0039808671110   
ffa1
003a808671120   
ef81
003b808671130   

008080861229b   fc5ff008ef41feb0
fea0
00a0900481785   e801fe9ff000
fe9e
010010024742b   fd00d801fe6ff000
fe6c


* fdisk


Disk /dev/sda: 64 heads, 32 sectors, 1002 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   * 1   995   1018864   83  Linux
/dev/sda2   996  1002  7168   82  Linux swap

Disk /dev/sdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 529 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/sdb1   * 1   529   4249161   83  Linux

Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1247 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   * 1  1247  10016496   83  Linux

Disk /dev/hdb: 1 heads, 1316380 sectors, 1 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1316380 * 512 bytes


Disk /dev/hdc: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 26354 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/hdc1   * 1 26280  13245088+  83  Linux
/dev/hdc2 26281 26354 37296   82  Linux swap

Disk /dev/hdd: 16 heads, 63 sectors, 25228 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 bytes

   Device BootStart   EndBlocks   Id  System
/dev/hdd1   * 1 24380  12287488+  83  Linux
/dev/hdd2 24381 252284273925  Extended
/dev/hdd5 24381 25228427360+  82  Linux swap


* scsi

Attached devices: 
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
  Vendor: SONY Model: CD-R   CDU920S   Rev: 2.0b
  Type:   WORM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
  Vendor: MICROP   Model: 4110-09NB_Nov18F Rev: TN0F
  Type:   Direct-Access   

[Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-08 Thread Hal Black

On today's 7.2beta install, diskdrake is unable to detect partitions on
my IDE drives (primary and secondary) the SCSI drives are detected fine,
however.  The partition tables were created using fdisk on mandrake
7.1.  These same IDE partitions, however, can be seen with no problem in
fdisk once linux is installed.




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-08 Thread Pixel

Hal Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On today's 7.2beta install, diskdrake is unable to detect partitions on
 my IDE drives (primary and secondary)

what is the error? looks like a hardware/kernel pb to me




Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-08 Thread Hal Black

Pixel wrote:
 
 Hal Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  On today's 7.2beta install, diskdrake is unable to detect partitions on
  my IDE drives (primary and secondary)
 
 what is the error? looks like a hardware/kernel pb to me

In the installer, it says something about being unable to read the
partition tables.  In Diskdrake from Linux, I get no error message.  The
drives still appear in diskdrake, but the partition table is just blank
white unpartitioned space.  Clicking rescue partition table will bring
back the real partitions.

I see the same symptoms when running diskdrake within Linux (not the
installler).  diskdrake can't see the ide partition tables, but fdisk
sees them with no problem.  Mandrake is also installed and running off
of these "invisible" partitions, so I don't think it's a hardware or
kernel problem.

I also experienced a much nastier problem with this bug, when clicking
on the "rescue partition table" on a drive where I had an ext2 file
system not related to the install, and consented to a write of the
partition table (cancel wouldn't let me avoid it) I somehow lost all of
the data on that partition (oh the pain!).  dd if=/dev/hdb5 now reports
a lot of nulls which was previously my data.  I'm not sure if this is a
result of me telling it not to format that mount in the install, and it
ignoring me, or whether diskdrake does something when it writes a
partition table.  I believe it is the latter because the format would
imply that it it created an ext2 filesystem, which is not there.
 S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-08 Thread Ray

I have the same exact problem and have thru all of the betas..
But it is not a Mandrake problem.. I just installed RedHat 7.0 on the same 
machine with the same results. Now I have installed RH and Mandrake versions 
from 5.2 with nio problems.. Must be in the kernel...

On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:

  Pixel wrote:
  Hal Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   On today's 7.2beta install, diskdrake is unable to detect partitions on
   my IDE drives (primary and secondary)
 
  what is the error? looks like a hardware/kernel pb to me

 In the installer, it says something about being unable to read the
 partition tables.  In Diskdrake from Linux, I get no error message.  The
 drives still appear in diskdrake, but the partition table is just blank
 white unpartitioned space.  Clicking rescue partition table will bring
 back the real partitions.

 I see the same symptoms when running diskdrake within Linux (not the
 installler).  diskdrake can't see the ide partition tables, but fdisk
 sees them with no problem.  Mandrake is also installed and running off
 of these "invisible" partitions, so I don't think it's a hardware or
 kernel problem.

 I also experienced a much nastier problem with this bug, when clicking
 on the "rescue partition table" on a drive where I had an ext2 file
 system not related to the install, and consented to a write of the
 partition table (cancel wouldn't let me avoid it) I somehow lost all of
 the data on that partition (oh the pain!).  dd if=/dev/hdb5 now reports
 a lot of nulls which was previously my data.  I'm not sure if this is a
 result of me telling it not to format that mount in the install, and it
 ignoring me, or whether diskdrake does something when it writes a
 partition table.  I believe it is the latter because the format would
 imply that it it created an ext2 filesystem, which is not there.


Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature





Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-08 Thread Hal Black

Ray wrote:
 
 I have the same exact problem and have thru all of the betas..
 But it is not a Mandrake problem.. I just installed RedHat 7.0 on the same
 machine with the same results. Now I have installed RH and Mandrake versions
 from 5.2 with nio problems.. Must be in the kernel...

How can it be a kernel problem when fdisk can see everything just fine? 
Only diskdrake can't see it.
 S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [Cooker] Diskdrake unable to detect IDE drive partitions

2000-10-08 Thread G. Fischbach

Does you hard drive use UDMA if it does turn it off in one of your BIOS
options of setup and  see if the trouble is fixed.  That is what I did to fix the
trouble. You can turn it on when the install is complete.
 Gerry Fischbach

Hal Black wrote:

 Ray wrote:
 
  I have the same exact problem and have thru all of the betas..
  But it is not a Mandrake problem.. I just installed RedHat 7.0 on the same
  machine with the same results. Now I have installed RH and Mandrake versions
  from 5.2 with nio problems.. Must be in the kernel...

 How can it be a kernel problem when fdisk can see everything just fine?
 Only diskdrake can't see it.