Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 20:26, Ruairi Hickey wrote: Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? ( Ruairi I did another install today (Sunday 25th) with an updated cooker and had the same results.. I have yet to get cooker to boot off of reiserfs... ext2 works just fine I can boot into my 7.2 and mount the partitions without a problem Where do I start to try figure out what's causing this... Hardware is a Dell WorkStation 410, UW AIC7890 scsi on module AIC7xxx with 2 hard drives... The cooker drive has a 2gb windows partition followed be 3gb reiserfs / and 3gb reiserfs /home and swap. Ruairi
Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker
Ruairi Hickey wrote: Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? ( Ruairi Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1 Have you checked for the initrd image, mandrake doesn't compile reiserfs support as part of the kernel, rather was a module. I have noticed that some mandrake cooker kernel rpms make the initrd image and modify lilo/ grub automagically, others don't.
[Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker
Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? ( Ruairi Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker
Ruairi Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? ( yes it does, i have just installed in cooker with full reiserfs without any problem.. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker
I don't think so. Looks like the kernel module isn't loaded until a filesystem in /etc/fstab is accessed. I also tried to make my root partition with reiser and got the same results. Ruairi Hickey wrote: Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? ( Ruairi Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker
James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Either it was fixed over the weekend and the installer fix hadn't percolated out to us, that should be the reason. -You didn't install the standard 2.4.x kernel, you installed the 2.2.x kernel or perhaps even the 2.4.1-linus version of the kernel (though I doubt that). you take me for a newbie ? -There is some bug that we tripped over and you didn't. I believe I did a very vanilla install that time, because I was already suspicious that reiserfs wouldn't boot with 2.4.1, having tried copying my root fs to a reiserfs fs and booting late 2.3.x kernels, and failed at it for reasons I've yet to understand. i'll check with new install, got to fix a nfs+reiserfs problem before... -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Ruairi Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?).. Does the 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ? ( yes it does, i have just installed in cooker with full reiserfs without any problem.. I saw the same problem as Ruairi this weekend, up to date as of st least Saturday night. So there are three possible explanations I see for it working for you... -Either it was fixed over the weekend and the installer fix hadn't percolated out to us, -You didn't install the standard 2.4.x kernel, you installed the 2.2.x kernel or perhaps even the 2.4.1-linus version of the kernel (though I doubt that). -There is some bug that we tripped over and you didn't. I believe I did a very vanilla install that time, because I was already suspicious that reiserfs wouldn't boot with 2.4.1, having tried copying my root fs to a reiserfs fs and booting late 2.3.x kernels, and failed at it for reasons I've yet to understand. James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- People seek to feel better immediately and, to accomplish that, they yield to temptations even when doing so may be contrary to their long-term best interests and...goals. -Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001;80:53-67 _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com