[Cooker] where is glibc-utils -5mdk

[Olivier Thauvin]

Hamster is a fabulous bot, it find rpm on my mirror.
So, where is glibc-utils -5mdk:
 main cooker i586: glibc-2.3.2-5mdk.i586.rpm
 main cooker i586: glibc-utils-2.3.2-4mdk.i586.rpm

(Urpmi said same things)
Thanks hamster.

BTW: I got a failed about memusage on ppc, I am investigate because I don't 
why it won't rebuild...
-- 
Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer
une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL.
Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/

Re: [Cooker] where is xev gone?

[Pascal Terjan]

Bernd Niederberger wrote:
Hi everybody,

I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?
Looks like X11R6-contrib is not on CDs. You can get it from a cooker mirror.

[Cooker] where is xev gone?

[Bernd Niederberger]

Hi everybody,

I 've installed Mandrake 9.1-rc3 and I am missing xev.
Has anybody an idea where it is?

Regards
 Bernd

Re: [Cooker] where is the kde-libs documentation stored?

[Quel Qun]

On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 01:31, Gary Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sunday 23 March 2003 2:24 am, Quel Qun wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 23:12, Gary Greene wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >
> > > subject asks it all...
> >
> > I don't think it's anywhere, there's a defect entered about that.
> > You need to regenerate them from the kdelibs sources.
> > And don't forget to complain loudly.
> 
> That sucks. SuSE has it set up the right way where the docs are pregened for 
> you. IS this entered as a bug on Mandrake's Bugzilla? Or, rather, should I 
> contact the KDE project about this?
> 

There's at least one entry in bugzilla:

http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405

I think this one is a duplicate:

http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3202

I also reported it earlier (Aug 2002):

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg72244.html

There were surely some good reasons why these docs weren't generated 
during development (time and size), but it would have been nice to have
them in the final product. It's too late anyhow.
-- 
 _   _ _   _
| |_| | |_/ |
| / / -_) | / / |
|_\_\___|_|_\_\_| @ sbcglobal.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Cooker] where is the kde-libs documentation stored?

[Gary Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 23 March 2003 2:24 am, Quel Qun wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 23:12, Gary Greene wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > subject asks it all...
>
> I don't think it's anywhere, there's a defect entered about that.
> You need to regenerate them from the kdelibs sources.
> And don't forget to complain loudly.

That sucks. SuSE has it set up the right way where the docs are pregened for 
you. IS this entered as a bug on Mandrake's Bugzilla? Or, rather, should I 
contact the KDE project about this?

- -- 
Gary L. Greene, Jr.
Sent from uriel.gvsu.edu
 04:29:14 up 1 day,  1:57,  5 users,  load average: 1.61, 1.03, 0.49

Founder and president of the Grand Valley Linux Users Group.
  -==-
PHONE : 331-0562
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+fX7iyPw381UL7WcRAmGrAJ9uidSBK9j3dB077/SyYyoXZXr+/wCfW78k
/RfzzOCcD58J2sHdEHli+ro=
=kDE7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [Cooker] where is the kde-libs documentation stored?

[Quel Qun]

On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 23:12, Gary Greene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> subject asks it all...
> 
I don't think it's anywhere, there's a defect entered about that.
You need to regenerate them from the kdelibs sources.
And don't forget to complain loudly.
-- 
 _   _ _   _
| |_| | |_/ |
| / / -_) | / / |
|_\_\___|_|_\_\_| @ sbcglobal.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Cooker] where is the kde-libs documentation stored?

[Per Øyvind Karlsen]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 23 March 2003 08:12, Gary Greene wrote:
> subject asks it all...
rpm -ql kdelibs?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] hawkeye]$ rpm -ql kdelibs|grep doc
/usr/share/doc/HTML
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common/1.png
/usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common/10.png
...
- -- 
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+fWArv8F7V9JOSuURAlgIAKDcdm3wPD+E22TzZkJ5TqCu4BftzQCdHv5d
Wis8E1MSgXw8xETH843anKo=
=7tQ5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[Cooker] where is the kde-libs documentation stored?

[Gary Greene]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


subject asks it all...

- --
Gary L. Greene, Jr.
Sent from uriel.gvsu.edu
 02:11:33 up 23:39,  5 users,  load average: 0.10, 0.10, 0.11

Founder and president of the Grand Valley Linux Users Group.
  -==-
PHONE : 331-0562
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+fV5yyPw381UL7WcRAlkuAJ9UZjcObUBtQ9fzsfmlXgPghWIPuQCeJ/Hp
jzlGkc2GFREHi2pfwKb7DQU=
=oWwa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[Cooker] where is the original bug-reporting howto ?

[Guillaume Rousse]

I remeber some times ago (maybe one year back) someone from this list proposed 
some kind of howto about reporting bugs properly (using strace, reporting 
stderr output, etc...). I can't find it anywhere in cooker archive 
unfortunatly :-(
Could the author please remind us of where it was ?
-- 
All components become obsolete. 
-- Murphy's Computer Laws n°8

Re: [Cooker] where is aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm and aspell-en-0.50.2-2mdk.i586.rpm

[Todd Lyons]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bj?rn wrote on Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:24:45AM + :
> Is this OK? (Y/n)
> 
> ftp.uninett.no::Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm
> link_stat 
> /Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm : No 
> such file or directory
> rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(636)

Two reasons that frequently happens
1) You ran out of disk space (doesn't look to be the right error code
for that though).
2) The remote server deleted it in the middle of your session because it
synced to a master server and that's one of the files that got updated.

Most likely #2.

Blue skies...   Todd
- -- 
Never take no as an answer from someone who's not authorized to say yes.
--Ben Reser on Cooker ML
  Mandrake Cooker Devel Version, Kernel 2.4.21-0.12mdk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+aTbXlp7v05cW2woRAlzjAJ9c0+RWe0sFaLGaoXOEayCNv8t7QwCeNbM0
AYIoczxdMt6SeDi/wJWPhTU=
=dOCR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

[Cooker] where is aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm and aspell-en-0.50.2-2mdk.i586.rpm

[Bjørn]

Is this OK? (Y/n)

ftp.uninett.no::Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm
link_stat 
/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm : No 
such file or directory
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(636)

ftp.uninett.no::Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-en-0.50.2-2mdk.i586.rpm
link_stat 
/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/aspell-en-0.50.2-2mdk.i586.rpm : No 
such file or directory
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(636)
Installation failed, some files are missing:
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/aspell-no-0.50.2-3mdk.i586.rpm
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/aspell-en-0.50.2-2mdk.i586.rpm
You may want to update your urpmi database

Re: [Cooker] Where is everybody?

[tarvid]

On Saturday 01 March 2003 07:41 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
> I don't think I ever have not gotten a message in a 8 hour time span
> before.
the gates are open now

jim tarvid

[Cooker] Where is everybody?

[Greg Meyer]

I don't think I ever have not gotten a message in a 8 hour time span before.
-- 
Greg

Re: [Cooker] Where is kcontrol ??

[James Sparenberg]

On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 12:53, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:47, Chuck Shirley wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:21, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
> > >Is it wanted ? kcontrol does not appear in the menu. You only have 
> > >access to each kcontrol part separately, but not as a single application.
> > >This would be nice to have it in the KDE config submenu.
> > 
> > Yes!  I have been wondering about this as well.  I accidentally deleted
> > the button from my kicker panel, and the only substitute is a preferences
> > button that pops up a menu with only one entry: kcontrol.  It would be
> > much nicer have it readily available, without having to manually
> > create the button, which is probably beyond most Linux newcomers.
> 
> Did you customize your menu?  I haven't and it's right there "Control
> Center" as soon as the menu opens.  If you've customized your menu (not
> kicker), then you'll have to add it back in, or delete the
> ~/.kde/share/applnk-mdk directory so it uses the default system menu.

Just a note://  Didn't have it here either until I did edit my menu to
make it appear.  

James
> 
> 
> TTFN,
> Lonnie Borntreger
> 
> 
> 

Re: [Cooker] Where is kcontrol ??

[Lonnie Borntreger]

On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:47, Chuck Shirley wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:21, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
> >Is it wanted ? kcontrol does not appear in the menu. You only have 
> >access to each kcontrol part separately, but not as a single application.
> >This would be nice to have it in the KDE config submenu.
> 
> Yes!  I have been wondering about this as well.  I accidentally deleted
> the button from my kicker panel, and the only substitute is a preferences
> button that pops up a menu with only one entry: kcontrol.  It would be
> much nicer have it readily available, without having to manually
> create the button, which is probably beyond most Linux newcomers.

Did you customize your menu?  I haven't and it's right there "Control
Center" as soon as the menu opens.  If you've customized your menu (not
kicker), then you'll have to add it back in, or delete the
~/.kde/share/applnk-mdk directory so it uses the default system menu.


TTFN,
Lonnie Borntreger

Re: [Cooker] Where is kcontrol ??

[Chuck Shirley]

On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:21, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote:
>Is it wanted ? kcontrol does not appear in the menu. You only have 
>access to each kcontrol part separately, but not as a single application.
>This would be nice to have it in the KDE config submenu.

Yes!  I have been wondering about this as well.  I accidentally deleted
the button from my kicker panel, and the only substitute is a preferences
button that pops up a menu with only one entry: kcontrol.  It would be
much nicer have it readily available, without having to manually
create the button, which is probably beyond most Linux newcomers.

-C.S.

[Cooker] Where is kcontrol ??

[Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN)]

Is it wanted ? kcontrol does not appear in the menu. You only have 
access to each kcontrol part separately, but not as a single application.
This would be nice to have it in the KDE config submenu.

Re: [Cooker] where is prelink?

[Antony Suter]

Where is prelink? Is it contained within another package?


On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 23:55, Antony Suter wrote:
> To compile the current glibc in cooker requires prelink, but prelink is
> not in cooker...
> 
> --
> Name: glibcRelocations: (not
> relocateable)
> Version : 2.3.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 7mdk  Build Date: Wed Jan 22
> 13:32:29 2003
-- 
- Antony Suter  (sutera internode on net)  "Exner"
- "Your post-apocalyptic caffeine source! :)"

[Cooker] where is prelink?

[Antony Suter]

To compile the current glibc in cooker requires prelink, but prelink is
not in cooker...

--
Name: glibcRelocations: (not
relocateable)
Version : 2.3.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 7mdk  Build Date: Wed Jan 22
13:32:29 2003

-- 
- Antony Suter  (sutera internode on net)  "Exner"
- "Your post-apocalyptic caffeine source! :)"

Re: [Cooker] where is php430 ?

[Mark Scott]

J.A. Magallon wrote:

PHP modules update require it, and it does not appear in mirrors...


Install the php-cli-4.3.0-1mdk or php-cgi-4.3.0-1mdk package. They 
provide php430.

--
Mark Scott

[Cooker] where is php430 ?

[J.A. Magallon]

PHP modules update require it, and it does not appear in mirrors...

-- 
J.A. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  \ Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es \   It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.1 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.21-pre3-jam1 (gcc 3.2.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2.1-2mdk))

Re: [Cooker] Where is the dev rpm??

[Jason]

I see, thanks for that!!

Regards,

Jason

Charles A Edwards wrote:


On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:36:23 +1300
Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 

It doesn't appear to be on the cooker mirrors??

Is it not necessary anymore? ;)
   



There is only makedev now.
It provides /dev 


   Charles


Ignorance is bliss.
		-- Thomas Gray

Fortune updates the great quotes, #42:
	BLISS is ignorance.
--
Charles A Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


 

Re: [Cooker] Where is the dev rpm??

[Charles A Edwards]

On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 10:36:23 +1300
Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> It doesn't appear to be on the cooker mirrors??
> 
> Is it not necessary anymore? ;)


There is only makedev now.
It provides /dev 


Charles


Ignorance is bliss.
-- Thomas Gray

Fortune updates the great quotes, #42:
BLISS is ignorance.
--
Charles A Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

[Cooker] Where is the dev rpm??

[Jason]

It doesn't appear to be on the cooker mirrors??

Is it not necessary anymore? ;)

Re: [Cooker] Where is the dictionary file of open office?

[Carfield Yim]

> W. Kasberg wrote:
> > On Monday 07 October 2002 09:19, Robert C. Dowdy wrote:
> > 
> 
> >>Actually, I believe this *is* a bug.  I've installed 9.0 final three times
> >>and each time spell checking in OpenOffice.org was broken until I manually
> >>installed a US English myspell (which newbies certainly wouldn't know to
> >>do). It doesn't seem likely that OO.o should have broken spell-checking
> >>intentionally.  Maybe it's just a problem for US English installations. 
> >>I'm not sure.
> >>
> 
> Yes, even when installing from rpmdrake (haven't tried urpmi recently, 
> but that did the right thing last time), it seems that myspell-en_CA is 
> installed automatically when local is english.
>
I just download the dictionary from ooodi.sf.net, the size of English
dictionary is 695724 bytes, but the one come with Mandrake is just about
700 bytes, seen to me that it is an empty dictionary.

Besides, as OpenOffice.org-l10n-en-1.0.1-9mdk don't depend on
myspell-en_US, will it really use myspell-en_US for spell check?

Re: [Cooker] Where is the dictionary file of open office?

[Buchan Milne]

W. Kasberg wrote:
> On Monday 07 October 2002 09:19, Robert C. Dowdy wrote:
> 

>>Actually, I believe this *is* a bug.  I've installed 9.0 final three times
>>and each time spell checking in OpenOffice.org was broken until I manually
>>installed a US English myspell (which newbies certainly wouldn't know to
>>do). It doesn't seem likely that OO.o should have broken spell-checking
>>intentionally.  Maybe it's just a problem for US English installations. 
>>I'm not sure.
>>

Yes, even when installing from rpmdrake (haven't tried urpmi recently, 
but that did the right thing last time), it seems that myspell-en_CA is 
installed automatically when local is english.


-- 
|Registered Linux User #182071-|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7

Re: [Cooker] Where is the dictionary file of open office?

[W. Kasberg]

On Monday 07 October 2002 09:19, Robert C. Dowdy wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 5:55 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Vox wrote:
> > > Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of
> > > > OpenOffice. However, the package don't contain any dictionary files.
> > > > Where can I find the dictionary file and install?
> > >
> > >   urpmi OpenOffice.org-l10n-
> > >
> > >   Vox
> >
> > Actullay, try:
> >
> > # urpmi myspell
> >
> > and then select your language. OpenOffice.org requires a myspell, so you
> > probably have one installed already, you might want to use Software
> > Manager to search for myspell, and choose additional dictionaries.
> >
> > But, please remember that this is not a support list, and your post was
> > not a bug report, but seems very much like a support question. There are
> > more appropriate lists for that.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Buchan
>
> Actually, I believe this *is* a bug.  I've installed 9.0 final three times
> and each time spell checking in OpenOffice.org was broken until I manually
> installed a US English myspell (which newbies certainly wouldn't know to
> do). It doesn't seem likely that OO.o should have broken spell-checking
> intentionally.  Maybe it's just a problem for US English installations. 
> I'm not sure.
>
This is also valid for german dictionary which is not installed automatically.
Also german help files have to be installed manually.
Hopefully this should be corrected with the next Mandrake edition (9.1 ?)

> The most serious aspect of this is that OO.o doesn't TELL the user that
> spelling is broken.  I could set Autocheck to "yes" and it didn't complain,
> it just didn't do anything.  I could manually order a spellcheck, and it
> didn't complain, it just didn't work (as if there were no spelling errors
> in the document, even if the document was all gibberish).
>
> Again, this definitely sounds like a bug to me.  =)
>
> Regards,
> Rob

Walter Kasberg
-- 

Re: [Cooker] Where is the dictionary file of open office?

[Robert C. Dowdy]

On Saturday 05 October 2002 5:55 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Vox wrote:
> > Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of
> > > OpenOffice. However, the package don't contain any dictionary files.
> > > Where can I find the dictionary file and install?
> >
> >   urpmi OpenOffice.org-l10n-
> >
> >   Vox
>
> Actullay, try:
>
> # urpmi myspell
>
> and then select your language. OpenOffice.org requires a myspell, so you
> probably have one installed already, you might want to use Software
> Manager to search for myspell, and choose additional dictionaries.
>
> But, please remember that this is not a support list, and your post was
> not a bug report, but seems very much like a support question. There are
> more appropriate lists for that.
>
> Regards,
> Buchan

Actually, I believe this *is* a bug.  I've installed 9.0 final three times and 
each time spell checking in OpenOffice.org was broken until I manually 
installed a US English myspell (which newbies certainly wouldn't know to do).  
It doesn't seem likely that OO.o should have broken spell-checking 
intentionally.  Maybe it's just a problem for US English installations.  I'm 
not sure.

The most serious aspect of this is that OO.o doesn't TELL the user that 
spelling is broken.  I could set Autocheck to "yes" and it didn't complain, 
it just didn't do anything.  I could manually order a spellcheck, and it 
didn't complain, it just didn't work (as if there were no spelling errors in 
the document, even if the document was all gibberish).

Again, this definitely sounds like a bug to me.  =)

Regards,
Rob

Re: [Cooker] Where is the dictionary file of open office?

[Buchan Milne]

On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Vox wrote:

> Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of OpenOffice.
> > However, the package don't contain any dictionary files. Where can I
> > find the dictionary file and install?
>
>   urpmi OpenOffice.org-l10n-
>
>   Vox

Actullay, try:

# urpmi myspell

and then select your language. OpenOffice.org requires a myspell, so you
probably have one installed already, you might want to use Software
Manager to search for myspell, and choose additional dictionaries.

But, please remember that this is not a support list, and your post was
not a bug report, but seems very much like a support question. There are
more appropriate lists for that.

Regards,
Buchan

-- 
|Registered Linux User #182071-|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7

Re: [Cooker] Where is the dictionary file of open office?

[Vox]

Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of OpenOffice.
> However, the package don't contain any dictionary files. Where can I
> find the dictionary file and install? 

  urpmi OpenOffice.org-l10n-

  Vox

-- 
Pain is the gift of the gods, and I'm the one they chose as their messenger
For info on safety in the BDSM lifestyle http://www.the-vox.com

Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs.  Kind
of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_
technology than everyone else.   -- Donald B. Marti Jr.

[Cooker] Where is the dictionary file of open office?

[Carfield Yim]

Hi all, I have installed the mandrake version rpm package of OpenOffice.
However, the package don't contain any dictionary files. Where can I
find the dictionary file and install? 

I remember that when I install the binary version of OpenOffice, it come
with the US English version of dictionary, where can I download it now?

  \\\|///
  \- - -//
 (  @ @  )
---oOOo-(_)-oOOo
Visit my homepage at http://www.carfield.com.hk

Programming discussion groups
Software design: news://news.carfield.com.hk/programming.design
Design Pattern: news://news.carfield.com.hk/programming.design.pattern
java: news://news.carfield.com.hk/programming.java
linux: news://news.carfield.com.hk/programming.linux

Re: [Cooker] Where is kermit?

[Leon Brooks]

On Wednesday 02 October 2002 01:00 am, Palmer, Hilary wrote:
> C-Kermit was in 8.2.  Used it almost every day.

Pull the 8.2 SRPM then, and rebuild it. Maybe PLF or Texstar have it.

Cheers; Leon

RE: [Cooker] Where is kermit?

[Palmer, Hilary]

C-Kermit was in 8.2.  Used it almost every day.

And the notice thing...  That is appended to every message that is sent out
of the hospital.

-Original Message-
From: David Walluck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Where is kermit?


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I like the vague one line message with the 10+ line confidentiality
notice. I'm not a lawyer, but I think that whatever is the law applies,
regardless of whether you put a notice like that or not... it really
seems like a waste of bandwidth. Besides, this is the mailing list, so
who is the intended recipient exactly? If a mail like this ever ends up
in my mailbox, I will take it for granted that I was the intended recipient.

Anyway, there is a 'C-Kermit' (not 'kermit', so I'm not sure if this is
what you are referring to) which, as far as I know, has never been
included in Mandrake.

You might be able to get away with minicom, which is in Cooker,
depending on what you need it for. So, my suggestion is try minicom, and
if thta fails you can pull C-Kermit from another RPM (I remember
'ckermit' being in 7.1 Contribs.

Palmer, Hilary wrote:
| Where did kermit go??  :-(
|
|
|
|   Confidentiality  Notice
|
| This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to
| whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
| confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  Any
| unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email
message,
| including any attachment, is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
| recipient, please advise the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of
| the original message.   Thank you.
|
|
|
|
| .
|


- --
Sincerely,

David Walluck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9mcrrJB7s/tlHKVIRAqUFAKCenTwX+ruEQLWe8YYQeKq1zAFzuwCfcNuS
htlE1BA8+30galAwnsNZxEg=
=eDe6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Confidentiality  Notice

This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to
whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email message,
including any attachment, is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please advise the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.   Thank you.

Re: [Cooker] Where is kermit?

[Jerry A!]

On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:13:32PM +0100, Alastair Scott wrote:
: On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:55:21 -0500  "Palmer, Hilary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: 
: > Where did kermit go??  :-(
: 
: Probably removed because the licence 
: 
: ftp://kermit.columbia.edu/kermit/f/COPYING.TXT
: 
: was considered too one-sided. This discussion is most revealing:
: 
: http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/kermit.html#license
: 
: Home-brewed university licences also put paid to pine and pico (University
: of Washington) from the main distribution ...

Fair enough.  But is there a repository of unwanted but still loved
mdk-rpm's out there?  Well, I guess other than PLF.

--Jerry

Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death...
...It's much more important than that!

Re: [Cooker] Where is kermit?

[David Walluck]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I like the vague one line message with the 10+ line confidentiality
notice. I'm not a lawyer, but I think that whatever is the law applies,
regardless of whether you put a notice like that or not... it really
seems like a waste of bandwidth. Besides, this is the mailing list, so
who is the intended recipient exactly? If a mail like this ever ends up
in my mailbox, I will take it for granted that I was the intended recipient.

Anyway, there is a 'C-Kermit' (not 'kermit', so I'm not sure if this is
what you are referring to) which, as far as I know, has never been
included in Mandrake.

You might be able to get away with minicom, which is in Cooker,
depending on what you need it for. So, my suggestion is try minicom, and
if thta fails you can pull C-Kermit from another RPM (I remember
'ckermit' being in 7.1 Contribs.

Palmer, Hilary wrote:
| Where did kermit go??  :-(
|
|
|
|   Confidentiality  Notice
|
| This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to
| whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
| confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  Any
| unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email
message,
| including any attachment, is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
| recipient, please advise the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of
| the original message.   Thank you.
|
|
|
|
| .
|


- --
Sincerely,

David Walluck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9mcrrJB7s/tlHKVIRAqUFAKCenTwX+ruEQLWe8YYQeKq1zAFzuwCfcNuS
htlE1BA8+30galAwnsNZxEg=
=eDe6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [Cooker] Where is kermit?

[J. Greenlees]

Palmer, Hilary wrote:

>Where did kermit go??  :-(
>
he was here a few weeks ago visiting miss piggy for new muppet christmas 
movie.
( filmed in my area ) ~wink~

Re: [Cooker] Where is kermit?

[Alastair Scott]

On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:55:21 -0500  "Palmer, Hilary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Where did kermit go??  :-(

Probably removed because the licence 

ftp://kermit.columbia.edu/kermit/f/COPYING.TXT

was considered too one-sided. This discussion is most revealing:

http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/kermit.html#license

Home-brewed university licences also put paid to pine and pico (University
of Washington) from the main distribution ...

Alastair

[Cooker] Where is kermit?

[Palmer, Hilary]

Where did kermit go??  :-(



Confidentiality  Notice

This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to
whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email message,
including any attachment, is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please advise the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.   Thank you.

Re: [Cooker] Where is the Gnome Pilot Applet?

[Richard Tango-Lowy]

That's indeed what I'm doing. And I'm glad to (finally) be able to synch
to my USB visor!

Rich

On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 10:18, Frederic Crozat wrote:

But you can still synchronize your palm with gnome-pilot : just add
gpilotd to your current session and check gpilotd output from
~/.xsession-errors file..

-- 
ars Cognita   Richard Tango-Lowy
  -
  President
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  603 424-0713



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Cooker] Where is the Gnome Pilot Applet?

[Frederic Crozat]

Le Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:13:44 +, Richard Tango-Lowy a écrit :

> --=-2RcLZxqwM4+gwJt7YKqN
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> I can't seem to find the gnome pilot applet in 9.0. Is it gone?

Indeed.. Gnome-pilot has not been ported to GNOME 2 yet..

But you can still synchronize your palm with gnome-pilot : just add
gpilotd to your current session and check gpilotd output from
~/.xsession-errors file..

--
Frederic Crozat
MandrakeSoft

Re: [Cooker] Where is the Gnome Pilot Applet?

[Goetz Waschk]

Am Dienstag, 13. August 2002, 08:13:44 Uhr MET, schrieb Richard Tango-Lowy:
> I can't seem to find the gnome pilot applet in 9.0. Is it gone?
If it's gnome1 stuff, then yes. The new gnome2 panel isn't compatible
with old applets :-( 
-- 
   Götz Waschk <> master of computer science  <> University of Rostock
 http://wwwtec.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key
 --> Logout Fascism! <--

[Cooker] Where is the Gnome Pilot Applet?

[Richard Tango-Lowy]

I can't seem to find the gnome pilot applet in 9.0. Is it gone?

Rich
-- 
ars Cognita   Richard Tango-Lowy
  -
  President
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  603 424-0713



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Cooker] where is libg2c.so.0 ?

[Oliver Lemke]

On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 21:47, Antony Suter wrote:
> 
> I'm trying to upgrade my perl to current cooker. I dont want to download
> unnecessary rpms. Please tell me where to find libg2c.so.0 ? Thanks.
> 
> error: failed dependencies:
>   libg2c.so.0   is needed by perl-PDL-2.3.3-3mdk

libf2c0

-- 
Oliver Lemke
University of Bremen - Institute of Environmental Physics
Satellite Microwave Atmospheric Sounding Group

[Cooker] where is libg2c.so.0 ?

[Antony Suter]

I'm trying to upgrade my perl to current cooker. I dont want to download
unnecessary rpms. Please tell me where to find libg2c.so.0 ? Thanks.

error: failed dependencies:
libg2c.so.0   is needed by perl-PDL-2.3.3-3mdk

-- 
- Antony Suter  (sutera internode on net)  "Exner"
- "Tools to make tools."

Re: [Cooker] where is ksysguard !!

[networker]

thx thats work :)

i have miss to try with locate :(

+

Le jeu 01/08/2002 à 08:08, David Walser a écrit :
> If your package is installed correctly, you have it.
> 
> [walser@mario walser]$ rpm -qlp
> /mnt/disk/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kdebase-3.0.2-28mdk.i586.rpm
> | grep sysguard
> /etc/ksysguarddrc
> /usr/bin/ksysguard
> /usr/bin/ksysguardd
> ...
> 
> --- networker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but im using kde i have kdebase !
> > 
> > but not ksysguard !
> > 
> > what can i do to find it !!! and use it ?
> > 
> > my kdebase version is 3.0.2-23
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> http://health.yahoo.com
> 
> 

Re: [Cooker] where is ksysguard !!

[Laurent Montel]

Le Thursday 01 August 2002 08:08, networker a écrit :
> but im using kde i have kdebase !
>
> but not ksysguard !
>
> what can i do to find it !!! and use it ?

Ksysguard is in kdebase.
Regards.

>
> my kdebase version is 3.0.2-23
>
> thx 4 help

Re: [Cooker] where is ksysguard !!

[David Walser]

If your package is installed correctly, you have it.

[walser@mario walser]$ rpm -qlp
/mnt/disk/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kdebase-3.0.2-28mdk.i586.rpm
| grep sysguard
/etc/ksysguarddrc
/usr/bin/ksysguard
/usr/bin/ksysguardd
...

--- networker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but im using kde i have kdebase !
> 
> but not ksysguard !
> 
> what can i do to find it !!! and use it ?
> 
> my kdebase version is 3.0.2-23

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com

Re: [Cooker] where is ksysguard !!

[networker]

but im using kde i have kdebase !

but not ksysguard !

what can i do to find it !!! and use it ?

my kdebase version is 3.0.2-23

thx 4 help


Le jeu 01/08/2002 à 06:46, David Walser a écrit :
> It's in the kdebase package.  It has not to my
> knowledge ever been a seperate package.
> 
> --- networker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > when i use urpm to find i find nothing :(
> > 
> > when i use rpmdrake it bug
> > 
> > where to find this useful pakage ?!
> > 
> > 
> 
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
> http://health.yahoo.com
> 
> 

Re: [Cooker] where is ksysguard !!

[David Walser]

It's in the kdebase package.  It has not to my
knowledge ever been a seperate package.

--- networker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> when i use urpm to find i find nothing :(
> 
> when i use rpmdrake it bug
> 
> where to find this useful pakage ?!
> 
> 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com

[Cooker] where is ksysguard !!

[networker]

when i use urpm to find i find nothing :(

when i use rpmdrake it bug

where to find this useful pakage ?!

Re: [Cooker] Where is AfterStep?

[Guillaume Rousse]

Le Mardi 9 Avril 2002 06:03, Sean Dague a écrit :
[..]
> > You can find it on the mirrors at mandrake/8.2/contrib/i586.
>
> What is the mechanism for adding contrib directories to rpmdrake?  I can't
> figure out where the hdlist is (thought I might just be missing it at this
> point).
The hdlist is hdlist2.cz, in mandrake/8.2/i586/Mandrake/base directory. If you 
use mandrake/8.2/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2 as rpm directory, this is nice, but if 
you use original mandrake/8.2/contrib/i586 dir, this make quite a strange 
relative path.
-- 
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

Re: [Cooker] Where is AfterStep?

[Sean Dague]

On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 04:52:19PM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 16:26, Sean Dague wrote:
> > I'm looking through the 8.2 RPM lists getting ready to upgrade my 4
> > Linux Mandrake 8.1 boxes, and can't for the life of me find AfterStep
> > in there anywhere.  Did it get yoinked again!?!
> >
> > I have been a loyal fan of Linux Mandrake for many years, and am a
> > member of the Mandrake Club, mostly because Mandrake has kept Xemacs
> > and AfterStep well configured.  I've also brought many of the other
> > developers that I work with over to Linux with Mandrake, and they all
> > use AfterStep as well.  Its great that frozen-bubbles made the cut for
> > Mandrake 8.2, but as a contributing member of the Mandrake Club I
> > really am annoyed that the window manager that I use got pulled so a
> > few more games could get added. :(
> >
> > -Sean
> 
> You can find it on the mirrors at mandrake/8.2/contrib/i586.

What is the mechanism for adding contrib directories to rpmdrake?  I can't
figure out where the hdlist is (thought I might just be missing it at this
point).

-Sean

-- 
___

Sean Dague  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://dague.net/sean

___

Re: [Cooker] Where is AfterStep?

[Peter Ruskin]

On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 16:26, Sean Dague wrote:
> I'm looking through the 8.2 RPM lists getting ready to upgrade my 4
> Linux Mandrake 8.1 boxes, and can't for the life of me find AfterStep
> in there anywhere.  Did it get yoinked again!?!
>
> I have been a loyal fan of Linux Mandrake for many years, and am a
> member of the Mandrake Club, mostly because Mandrake has kept Xemacs
> and AfterStep well configured.  I've also brought many of the other
> developers that I work with over to Linux with Mandrake, and they all
> use AfterStep as well.  Its great that frozen-bubbles made the cut for
> Mandrake 8.2, but as a contributing member of the Mandrake Club I
> really am annoyed that the window manager that I use got pulled so a
> few more games could get added. :(
>
>   -Sean

You can find it on the mirrors at mandrake/8.2/contrib/i586.
-- 
Peter Ruskin, Wrexham, Wales.  AMD Athlon XP 1600+, 512MB RAM.
Registered Linux User 219434.  Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Bluebird) 
Kernel 2.4.18-6mdk-win4lin,  XFree86 4.2.0, patch level 9mdk.
KDE: 2.2.2.  Qt: 2.3.1.  Up 1 day 22 hours 8 minutes.

[Cooker] Where is AfterStep?

[Sean Dague]

I'm looking through the 8.2 RPM lists getting ready to upgrade my 4 Linux
Mandrake 8.1 boxes, and can't for the life of me find AfterStep in there
anywhere.  Did it get yoinked again!?!

I have been a loyal fan of Linux Mandrake for many years, and am a member of
the Mandrake Club, mostly because Mandrake has kept Xemacs and AfterStep
well configured.  I've also brought many of the other developers that I work
with over to Linux with Mandrake, and they all use AfterStep as well.  Its
great that frozen-bubbles made the cut for Mandrake 8.2, but as a
contributing member of the Mandrake Club I really am annoyed that the
window manager that I use got pulled so a few more games could get added. :(

-Sean
-- 
___

Sean Dague  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://dague.net/sean

___

Re: [Cooker] where is this nice progress bar on boot?

[andre]

Op do 28-02-2002, om 18:03 schreef Borsenkow Andrej:
> People write about? I do not see it after updating kernel several times
> :(
> 
> -andrej

me too.

I want to see it. And think rute thinks about it just like with Aurora

Re: [Cooker] where is this nice progress bar on boot?

[Guillaume Cottenceau]

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> People write about? I do not see it after updating kernel several times
> :(

check the latest initscripts + bootsplash package.

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://www.frozen-bubble.org/

Re: [Cooker] where is this nice progress bar on boot?

[Warly]

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> People write about? I do not see it after updating kernel several times
> :(

It appears with splash screen.

A bit less buggy in initscripts 31mdk

-- 
Warly

Re: [Cooker] Where is enlightenment-conf?

[Guillaume Cottenceau]

Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi,
> 
> I see enlightenment-conf is not on the CDs... Was it forgotten or do you
> plan not to put it in the distro? This tool is very useful to configure
> E and I hope it will be available...

According to rpmmon, it's currently rejected, true. It can be for
several reasons: unmet dependancy, too little importance compared
to available space on CD's, problems redistributing...

[gc@bi ~/rpm] rpmmon -V -p /RPMS/enlightenment-conf-0.15-18mdk.i586.rpm 
Getting information about packages from: /home/gc/maints.cgi
Found maintainers for 3453 different packages.
Getting information about packages2cd from: https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/cooker.cd
Found CDs/packages: Disc1/357 Disc2/433 Disc3/357 Disc4/556 Disc5/428 Disc6/81 
Disc7/892 MISSING_DEPENDENCIES/40 REJECTED/471 
enlightenment-conf: baudens (REJECTED)


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://www.frozen-bubble.org/

[Cooker] Where is enlightenment-conf?

[Baal]

Hi,

I see enlightenment-conf is not on the CDs... Was it forgotten or do you
plan not to put it in the distro? This tool is very useful to configure
E and I hope it will be available...

Regards,

Baal

Re: [Cooker] where is kernel boot logo?

[Chmouel Boudjnah]

Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>> mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [..]
>> > and which version(s) does it work with? 
>> 
>> Latest kernel latest mkinitrd.
>
> Should mkinitrd not get a dependancy to bootsplash ?

No, because some people doen't want to have a bootsplash at boot.

-- 
http://www.chmouel.org/

Re: [Cooker] where is kernel boot logo?

[Christian Bricart]

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [..]
> > and which version(s) does it work with? 
> 
> Latest kernel latest mkinitrd.

Should mkinitrd not get a dependancy to bootsplash ?

Christian

-- 
"Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have
 everyone else mirror it."- Linus Torvalds

Re: [Cooker] where is kernel boot logo?

[Chmouel Boudjnah]

mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Where do you find "bootsplash rpm" ?? 

On the mirrors.

> and which version(s) does it work with? 

Latest kernel latest mkinitrd.

-- 
http://www.chmouel.org/

Re: [Cooker] where is kernel boot logo?

[mike]

Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> 
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > It has been replaced by small albeit cute penguin. What gives?
> 
> Install bootsplash rpm and regenerate an initrd.
> 
> --
> http://www.chmouel.org/


Where do you find "bootsplash rpm" ?? 

and which version(s) does it work with? 

Mike

Re: [Cooker] where is kernel boot logo?

[Chmouel Boudjnah]

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> It has been replaced by small albeit cute penguin. What gives?

Install bootsplash rpm and regenerate an initrd.

-- 
http://www.chmouel.org/

[Cooker] where is kernel boot logo?

[Borsenkow Andrej]

It has been replaced by small albeit cute penguin. What gives?

-andrej

Re: [Cooker] where is libfreetype.so.7 needed by kdetoys3 ?

[pascal]

 No problem, it works and i can live without it ;)
Pascal

Le Tuesday 05 February 2002 16:08, Laurent Montel a écrit :
> Le Tuesday 05 February 2002 15:00, pascal a écrit :
> > Missing rpm in contrib ?
> > no package seems to provide libfreetype.so.7
> >
> > # urpmi kdetoys3
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > libfreetype.so.7   is needed by kdetoys3-3.0-0.beta1.5mdk
>
> I don't have time to fix it.
> Wait please.
> Regards

Re: [Cooker] where is libfreetype.so.7 needed by kdetoys3 ?

[Laurent Montel]

Le Tuesday 05 February 2002 15:00, pascal a écrit :
> Missing rpm in contrib ?
> no package seems to provide libfreetype.so.7
>
> # urpmi kdetoys3
> error: failed dependencies:
> libfreetype.so.7   is needed by kdetoys3-3.0-0.beta1.5mdk

I don't have time to fix it.
Wait please.
Regards

[Cooker] where is libfreetype.so.7 needed by kdetoys3 ?

[pascal]

Missing rpm in contrib ?
no package seems to provide libfreetype.so.7

# urpmi kdetoys3
error: failed dependencies:
libfreetype.so.7   is needed by kdetoys3-3.0-0.beta1.5mdk

Re: [Cooker] Where is the lirc package - kernel deps

[Stefan]

... I forgot the Kernel modules ...

LIRC builds modules for the running Kernel, I see my 'unsupported'
Plustek parport scanner also needs misc modules.
I build the modules after every kernel update. How about an
kernel-modules-misc package with some additional modules? (to make me
happy ;-)

Stefan.

Am Sam, 2002-01-26 um 00.20 schrieb Stefan:
..
> I like to use my Hauppauge remote control to remote control my system
> (xawtv, radio, irmp3/cd, some [X]system cmds). 
> It's not a great thing to get the package working.But using it is great!
..

[Cooker] [cooker] Where is the lirc package

[Stefan]

Hi cookers,

I like to use my Hauppauge remote control to remote control my system
(xawtv, radio, irmp3/cd, some [X]system cmds). 
It's not a great thing to get the package working.But using it is great!
Are there any problems with http://www.lirc.org/ (I missed a mdk link) -
or is this package simply not seen (forgotten? - I'm native german!).

Stefan.

Re: [Cooker] Where is xpm.h

[Quel Qun]

On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 19:50, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 10:15:12PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
> > Isn't this header missing? It does not seem to be in libxpm4-devel
> > 
> > I cannot find it anywhere in fact.
> > 
> 
> I believe both maintainers (david and fredl) were trying to correct the
> same problem by removing xpm.h from _both_ libxpm4-devel and XFree86-devel ..
> 
>   -- geoff.
> 
Yep ;-) 

I just rebuilt libxpm removing the last spec file modification, and
xpm.h is back. I assume this is where it belongs.

=-=
kk1

Re: [Cooker] Where is xpm.h

[Stefan van der Eijk]

>
>
>Isn't this header missing? It does not seem to be in libxpm4-devel
>
It used to be in libxpm4-devel, then XFree86-*-4.1.99.6-1mdk came out 
which had xpm.h in the devel package (= conflict), then xpm.h was 
removed from libxpm4-devel (in libxpm4-*-3.4k-18mdk), and now it's also 
not in XFree86-*-4.1.99.6-2mdk...

Re: [Cooker] Where is xpm.h

[Geoffrey Lee]

On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 10:15:12PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
> Isn't this header missing? It does not seem to be in libxpm4-devel
> 
> I cannot find it anywhere in fact.
> 

I believe both maintainers (david and fredl) were trying to correct the
same problem by removing xpm.h from _both_ libxpm4-devel and XFree86-devel ..

-- geoff.

[Cooker] Where is xpm.h

[Quel Qun]

Isn't this header missing? It does not seem to be in libxpm4-devel

I cannot find it anywhere in fact.

=-=
kk1

Re: [Cooker] Where is the list with explanations from rpmlint?

[Guillaume Cottenceau]

"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > I made: automake-1.5-1mdk.src.rpm, bash-2.05a-2mdk.src.rpm,
> > fileutils-4.1-6mdk.src.rpm.
> >
> > And none of these packages made it into cooker/contrib
> 
> For bash and fileutils, I'm not sure, but I think automake has been
> discussed in cooker. Switching automake to 1.5 is something like
> switching autoconf from 2.1x to 2.5x -- disaster. And there's no
> concensus on how to deal with that yet.

Actually I should work on it to provide a similar solution to the
one we currently have for autoconf but I was too lazy to do it
and I wanted to wait until someone really badly needs it to
compile something important :-).


-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Where is the list with explanations from rpmlint?

[Han]

Frederic Lepied ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Ainsi parlait Han :
> > > 
> > > > I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from
> > > > rpmlint.
> > > >
> > > >   E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> > > >   /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
> > > >
> > > > What should I do about it? And does anybody have a full list
> > > > with explanations from rpmlint?
> > >
> > > You can try -info flag if you want more explanations about rpmlint
> > > recriminations.
> > > 
> > > This one means you can't have non-versioned files in a library
> > > package, which would cause a conflict when installing an other
> > > versioned package from the same library. You have to move either
> > > in main package or in devel package.
> > > 
> > > In your case, this seems to be an header file, which has to be in
> > > devel package anyway.
> > 
> > Ehh .. but the name is libuds1-devel. So it *is* devel package. How
> > does rpmlint know which package is devel (except by name)? 
> 
> This is the opposite. It knows this is a library package because a
> library is present whatever its name is.

No... Because it tries to install soemthing in /usr/lib and/or
/usr/includes :)


Groetjes, Han.
-- 
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software

Re: [Cooker] Where is the list with explanations from rpmlint?

[Frederic Lepied]

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Ainsi parlait Han :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from rpmlint.
> > >
> > >   E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> > > /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
> > >
> > > What should I do about it? And does anybody have a full list with
> > > explanations from rpmlint?
> > You can try -info flag if you want more explanations about rpmlint
> > recriminations.
> > 
> > This one means you can't have non-versioned files in a library
> package,
> > which
> > would cause a conflict when installing an other versioned package from
> the
> > same library. You have to move either in main package or in devel
> package.
> > 
> > In your case, this seems to be an header file, which has to be in
> devel
> > package anyway.
> 
> Ehh .. but the name is libuds1-devel. So it *is* devel package. How does
> rpmlint know which package is devel (except by name)?
> 

This is the opposite. It knows this is a library package because a
library is present whatever its name is.
-- 
Fred - May the source be with you

Re: [Cooker] Where is the list with explanations from rpmlint?

[Han]

Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Han :
> 
> > E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> >/usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
> 
> You can try -info flag if you want more explanations about rpmlint 
> recriminations.

Thanks, I looked everywhere for this info. Except there. :)

> This one means you can't have non-versioned files in a library
> package, which would cause a conflict when installing an other
> versioned package from the same library. You have to move either in
> main package or in devel package.

These are the comment that I get with rpmlint -i package.rpm:

  E: uds non-versioned-file-in-library-package /usr/include/uds/btrace.hh 

  The package contains files in non versioned directories. This makes
  impossible to have multiple major versions of the libraries installed.
  One solution can be to change the directories which contain the files to
  subdirs of /usr/lib/- or /usr/share/-.
  Another solution can be to include a version number in the file names
  themselves.

> In your case, this seems to be an header file, which has to be in
> devel package anyway.

In this case it is a bit weird since the package is a pure library with
documentation. Maybe it is even a bit silly to package this.

Interesting project btw.

  http://frost.flewid.de/uds


Groetjes, Han.
-- 
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software

RE: [Cooker] Where is the list with explanations from rpmlint?

[Borsenkow Andrej]

> Ainsi parlait Han :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from rpmlint.
> >
> >   E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> > /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
> >
> > What should I do about it? And does anybody have a full list with
> > explanations from rpmlint?
> You can try -info flag if you want more explanations about rpmlint
> recriminations.
> 
> This one means you can't have non-versioned files in a library
package,
> which
> would cause a conflict when installing an other versioned package from
the
> same library. You have to move either in main package or in devel
package.
> 
> In your case, this seems to be an header file, which has to be in
devel
> package anyway.

Ehh .. but the name is libuds1-devel. So it *is* devel package. How does
rpmlint know which package is devel (except by name)?

Re: [Cooker] Where is the list with explanations from rpmlint?

[Guillaume Rousse]

Ainsi parlait Han :
> Hi,
>
> I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from rpmlint.
>
>   E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh
>
> What should I do about it? And does anybody have a full list with
> explanations from rpmlint?
You can try -info flag if you want more explanations about rpmlint 
recriminations.

This one means you can't have non-versioned files in a library package, which 
would cause a conflict when installing an other versioned package from the 
same library. You have to move either in main package or in devel package.

In your case, this seems to be an header file, which has to be in devel 
package anyway.
-- 
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

[Cooker] Where is the list with explanations from rpmlint?

[Han]

Hi,

I am making a new rpm and I get this error message from rpmlint. 

  E: libuds1-devel non-versioned-file-in-library-package /usr/include/uds/flex_func.hh

What should I do about it? And does anybody have a full list with
explanations from rpmlint?


Groetjes, Han.
-- 
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software

[Cooker] Where is "Mkcd/Package.pm" ?

[Oden Eriksson]

Hi Warly,

mkcd-2.6.1-1mdk is missing "Mkcd/Package.pm".


rpm -Uvh perl-RPM-0.32-4mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
   1:perl-RPM   ### [100%]

rpm -Uvh perl-TimeDate-1.10-4mdk.noarch.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
   1:perl-TimeDate  ### [100%]

rpm -Uvh perl-File-NCopy-0.32-4mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
   1:perl-File-NCopy### [100%]

rpm -Uvh mkcd-2.6.1-1mdk.noarch.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
   1:mkcd   ### [100%]

mkcd
Can't locate Mkcd/Package.pm in @INC (@INC contains: 
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1 
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1 
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mkcd/List.pm 
line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mkcd/List.pm line 7.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mkcd/Group.pm 
line 8.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at 
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mkcd/Group.pm line 8.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/mkcd line 12.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/mkcd line 12.


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current uptime with kernel 2.4.16-11mdksmp: 3 hours 51 minutes
| cpu0 @ 799.53 bm, fan 4500 rpm, temp +29°C
| cpu1 @ 801.17 bm, fan 4354 rpm, temp +29.5°C

[Cooker] where is CVS for kde3 SPECS?

[Borsenkow Andrej]

They are not in SPECS they are not in contrib-SPECS. Where are they?

-andrej

Re: [Cooker] Where is Python-devel-2.1.1-5mdk ?

[Charles A Edwards]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:17:12 -0500
Paul Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thursday, Oct 25, 2001, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> 
> > > > So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this?
> > > 
> > > libpython2.1-devel-*
> > > 
> > 
> > But if python-devel is installed why does libpython-devel not show as an update
> > or at least a required depend?
> 
> Probably because it's a different name.  You get the warning when doing
> 'rpm -Uvh', because you're trying to update python.  Well, python-devel
> requires 2.1.1-4, so it tells you that, and won't do it because you're
> not updating python-devel also (because it's a different name).
> 
> Long story short, do 'rpm -e python-devel', and then you should be able
> to update just fine.
> 
 
I was updating using harddrake.

Did end up manually downloading the 5 pkgs and installing as a group
with -Uvh.

Had to do the same with the Orbit related pkgs.


   Charles

Re: [Cooker] Where is Python-devel-2.1.1-5mdk ?

[Paul Cox]

On Thursday, Oct 25, 2001, Charles A Edwards wrote:

> > > So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this?
> > 
> > libpython2.1-devel-*
> > 
> 
> But if python-devel is installed why does libpython-devel not show as an update
> or at least a required depend?

Probably because it's a different name.  You get the warning when doing
'rpm -Uvh', because you're trying to update python.  Well, python-devel
requires 2.1.1-4, so it tells you that, and won't do it because you're
not updating python-devel also (because it's a different name).

Long story short, do 'rpm -e python-devel', and then you should be able
to update just fine.

-- 
Paul Cox 
Kernel: 2.4.8-26mdk  -  Uptime: 16 hours 48 minutes.

Re: [Cooker] Where is Python-devel-2.1.1-5mdk ?

[Charles A Edwards]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:32:50 +0200 (CEST)
Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> 
> > So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this?
> 
> libpython2.1-devel-*
> 
> 
 
Thanks.

But if python-devel is installed why does libpython-devel not show as an update
or at least a required depend?

   Charles

Re: [Cooker] Where is Python-devel-2.1.1-5mdk ?

[Rainer Koschnick]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:50:46 -0400
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The following can not be installed from todays cooker
> 
>   tkinter-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
>   libpython2.1-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
>   python-docs-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
>   python-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
> 
> The reason being that python-2.1.1-4 is required by python-devel-2.1.1-4
> 
> So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this? 

How can a package be required by something that doesn't exist? :)

Just wondering,
Rainer

[Cooker] Where is Python-devel-2.1.1-5mdk ?

[Charles A Edwards]

The following can not be installed from todays cooker

  tkinter-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
  libpython2.1-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
  python-docs-2.1.1-5mdk.i586
  python-2.1.1-5mdk.i586

The reason being that python-2.1.1-4 is required by python-devel-2.1.1-4 

So where is python-devel-2.1.1-5 to solve this? 

   Charles

Re: [Cooker] Where is older gawk?

[R.I.P. Deaddog]

On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Pixel wrote:

> > > Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
> > > links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
> > > building process),
>
> i've just tested, and had no pb

Thanks, it's personal problem. My environment seems to be serious
broken in unknown way. Whenever I compiles gawk from source RPM (regardless
of version), the for() loop in awk scripts are completely messed up and
procedures inside for() loop never stop. And using binary from cooker
cures everything.

Abel

Re: [Cooker] Where is older gawk?

[Pixel]

Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > On 31 Aug 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > 
> > > > Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
> > > > a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!
> > >
> > > In 8.0 for example.
> > >
> > > /stable/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gawk-3.0.6-2mdk.i586.rpm
> > 
> > Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
> > links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
> > building process), 

i've just tested, and had no pb

Re: [Cooker] Where is older gawk?

[R.I.P. Deaddog]

On 1 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:

> > Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
> > links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
> > building process), but seems to be ignored. Should I report
> > it in bugzilla instead to get more attention?
>
> you get the attention, that maybe a bug in the awk but it is not a
> priority to debug actually.

Thanks that someone do hear me anyway :)

Abel

Re: [Cooker] Where is older gawk?

[Chmouel Boudjnah]

"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
> links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
> building process), but seems to be ignored. Should I report
> it in bugzilla instead to get more attention?

you get the attention, that maybe a bug in the awk but it is not a
priority to debug actually.

Re: [Cooker] Where is older gawk?

[Guillaume Cottenceau]

"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 31 Aug 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> 
> > >   Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
> > > a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!
> >
> > In 8.0 for example.
> >
> > /stable/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gawk-3.0.6-2mdk.i586.rpm
> 
> Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
> links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
> building process), but seems to be ignored. Should I report
> it in bugzilla instead to get more attention?

I think not :-).

Maybe Pixel and Chmouel have other things to do currently, or maybe
they'll check that... only Linus[1] knows that.

[gc@bi ~] rpmmon -p links,glibc
pixel
chmouel



Ref: 
[1] a.k.a God

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] Where is older gawk?

[R.I.P. Deaddog]

On 31 Aug 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:

> > Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
> > a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!
>
> In 8.0 for example.
>
> /stable/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gawk-3.0.6-2mdk.i586.rpm

Thanks a lot. I have reported problem about building glibc or
links with gawk 3.1.0 (infinitely large files are generated during
building process), but seems to be ignored. Should I report
it in bugzilla instead to get more attention?

Abel

Re: [Cooker] Where is older gawk?

[Guillaume Cottenceau]

"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi all,
> 
>   Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
> a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!

In 8.0 for example.

/stable/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gawk-3.0.6-2mdk.i586.rpm



-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

[Cooker] Where is older gawk?

[R.I.P. Deaddog]

Hi all,

Where can I get older gawk SRPMs(e.g. 3.0.6)? There are
a lot of nuisance with gawk 3.1.0 . TIA!

Abel

[Cooker] Where is the list of languages installed by RPM is defined?

[Borsenkow Andrej]

When some package provides different language resources (man pages,
message catalogs, etc) RPM installs only some of them. Where (file?
Variable?) is the list of languages defined?

-andrej

Re: [Cooker] Where is kde1-compat, qt-* in my cd (iso from mirror)

[Daouda LO]

DUCLOS Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Why kde1-compat-1.1.2-8mdk.i586.rpm & qt-1.44-30mdk.i586.rpm & (... ?) in 
> mandrake/8.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/ (mirror server) but not in my cd 
> 
> ]$ ll /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS/qt-*
> ls: /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS/qt-*: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type
> 
> ]$ ll /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS2/qt-*
> ls: /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS2/qt-*: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type
> 
> ]$ cat /mnt/cdrom/VERSION
> Linux-Mandrake 8.0 Traktopel-i586 20010418 13:31 <--- Why ?
> 
> ]$ lynx --dump 
> http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake/8.0/i586/VERSION
> Linux-Mandrake Traktopel-i586 20010418 12:15 <-- Why ?

Yes, no qt1 in cdrom due to lack of space.

[Cooker] Where is kde1-compat, qt-* in my cd (iso from mirror)

[DUCLOS Andre]

Why kde1-compat-1.1.2-8mdk.i586.rpm & qt-1.44-30mdk.i586.rpm & (... ?) in 
mandrake/8.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/ (mirror server) but not in my cd 

]$ ll /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS/qt-*
ls: /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS/qt-*: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type

]$ ll /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS2/qt-*
ls: /mnt/cdrom/Mandrake/RPMS2/qt-*: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type

]$ cat /mnt/cdrom/VERSION
Linux-Mandrake 8.0 Traktopel-i586 20010418 13:31 <--- Why ?

]$ lynx --dump 
http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake/8.0/i586/VERSION
Linux-Mandrake Traktopel-i586 20010418 12:15 <-- Why ?

]$ lynx --dump http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/
mandrake/8.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS | grep qt-
 [   ]  [1451]qt-1.44-30mdk.i586.rpm  11-Apr-2001 22:01   895k
 [   ]  [1452]qt-devel-1.44-30mdk...> 11-Apr-2001 22:01   2.5M
 [   ]  [1453]qt-qgl-1.44-30mdk.i5..> 11-Apr-2001 22:0120k
 [   ]  [1454]qt-qimgio-1.44-30mdk..> 11-Apr-2001 22:0114k


Thinks

-- 
On se fait stoïcien, mais on naît épicurien.
Diderot


Linux Mandrake release 8.0 (Traktopel) for i586

2x PIII800EB + 512 Mo -- Linux 2.4.3-20mdksmp i686

Uptime :   3:24pm  up 3 days, 22:28,  3 users,  load average: 2.20, 2.05, 1.69

Re: [Cooker] where is kdat in LM 8.0 ?

[Daouda LO]

"W.Kasberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I am missing kdat. It should be in kdeadmin - but is not - why?

I just notice that kdat have the option Do_NOT_COMPILE in 
kdeadmin configure file (Maybe for good reasons, i don't know)
Ok, i can't test it there as i don't have tape.
So i gonna build a new kdeadmin and let you test it.
Is that fair enough?