Re: [Cooker] BM --> some more fixes...
> > > When is a package that contains forms.h going to be included in cooker? > > > > > The following problems have been detected by configure. > > > Please check the messages below before running 'make'. > > > (see the section 'Problems' in the INSTALL file) > > > > > ** Cannot find libforms or libxforms. Please check that the xforms > > > library > > >is correctly installed on your system. > > > > > ** Cannot find forms.h. Please check that the forms library > > >is correctly installed on your system. > Instlal fltk-devel? I checked on the buildhosts .. Yup (now I feel stupid), I guess the includepath needs to be changed in lyx then... Stefan
Re: [Cooker] BM --> some more fixes...
Yo, I'm stil trying to take care of lesstif. :( > > When is a package that contains forms.h going to be included in cooker? > > > The following problems have been detected by configure. > > Please check the messages below before running 'make'. > > (see the section 'Problems' in the INSTALL file) > > > ** Cannot find libforms or libxforms. Please check that the xforms > > library > >is correctly installed on your system. > > > ** Cannot find forms.h. Please check that the forms library > >is correctly installed on your system. > > > === > Instlal fltk-devel? I checked on the buildhosts .. > Hope it helps... > > Stefan -- Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> §õªø· ~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant. http://devel.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk
Re: [Cooker] BM --> some more fixes...
An update: > Hi, here's the status on the packages with BM problems... I'm working on > fixing them, some of them are done and can be downloaded from my server, > some of them . > === > Please rebuild the following packages, they should be fine then: > dpsftplib-0.1.6-2mdk > fribidi-0.1.9-1mdk > isicom-3.0-3mdk > jpilot-Mail-0.0.3-1mdk > tetex-latex-heb-1.0-2mdk > ttfonts-1.3-6mdk > xcin-2.5.2-1mdk > === > dhcpxd-1.0.3-4mdk.i586.rpm > /usr/man/man8/dhcpxd.8.bz2 > Fix: > http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/dhcpxd-1.0.3-5mdk.src.rpm > * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1.0.3-5mdk > - BM macro's > === > gatos-0.0.6-0.2303.5mdk.i586.rpm > /usr/man > /usr/man/fr > /usr/man/fr/man1 > /usr/man/fr/man1/atisplit.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/atitogif.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/atitojpg.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/atitoppm.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/atitv.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos-conf.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/gatos.conf.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/scanpci.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/xatitv.1.bz2 > /usr/man/fr/man1/yuvsum.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1 > /usr/man/man1/atisplit.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/atitogif.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/atitojpg.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/atitoppm.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/atitv.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/gatos-conf.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/gatos.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/gatos.conf.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/scanpci.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/xatitv.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/yuvsum.1.bz2 > > I'm just wondering: shouldn't this package also have a ExcludeArch: for > the alpha? RedHat doesn't have this package in rawhide-alpha or > redhat-6.2-alpha at the moment, which of you alpha users actually > _needs_ this package (the package requires some specific ATI hardware)? > > For the rest: the .spec file is a mess. It uses a filelist, etc. etc. > Not the way it should be. I'm looking into this one now... I screw up on the French manpages... Maybe a pro can have a go at it, I give up ;-) > === > Glide_V3-2.60.15-5mdk.i586.rpm > /usr/doc/Glide2/glide_license.txt > /usr/doc/Glide3/glide_license.txt > > Glide_V3-devel-2.60.15-5mdk.i586.rpm > /usr/doc/Glide2/glidepgm.pdf > /usr/doc/Glide2/glideref.pdf > /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3pgm.pdf > /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3ref.pdf > /usr/doc/Glide3/glide3relno.pdf > Fix: > http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/Glide_V3-2.60.15-6mdk.src.rpm > * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2.60.15-6mdk > - macro's + BM Someone take a look at mine (above) or Alexander's at http://dp.ath.cx/rpms. Please fix. Thanks. > === > joe-2.8-19mdk.i586.rpm > /usr/man/man1/joe.1.bz2 > Fix: > http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/joe-2.8-20mdk.src.rpm > * Sun Sep 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.8-20mdk > - BM > - some macro's === kterm-6.2.0-13mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/ja/man1/kterm.1.bz2 Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/kterm-6.2.0-14mdk.src.rpm * Mon Sep 25 2000 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6.2.0-14mdk - BM + macro's == libPropList-0.10.1-3mdk.i586.rpm Size: 123689 License: GPL/LGPL (see files COPYING and COPYING.LIB in /usr/doc/libPropList) libPropList-devel-0.10.1-3mdk.i586.rpm Size: 66550License: GPL/LGPL (see files COPYING and COPYING.LIB in /usr/doc/libPropList) http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/libPropList-0.10.1-4mdk.src.rpm * Mon Sep 25 2000 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.10.1-4mdk - changed path in Copyright header to /usr/share/doc === publib-devel-0.31-1mdk.i586.rpm /usr/man/man3/__set_liberror.3pub.bz2 Fix: http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/fixes/cooker/publib-devel-0.31-2mdk.src.rpm * Mon Sep 25 2000 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.31-2mdk - BM + macro's > === > The following packages don't build on my alpha or intel system, but they > do contain files that are not BM compliant... Can someone at Mandrake > try rebuilding these packages on ke no or bi and tell me the result? > kdbg-1.0.2-2mdk.i586.rpm > kfun21-0.2-1mdk.i586.rpm > kmol-0.2.1-4mdk.i586.rpm > kover-0.4-7mdk.i586.rpm > ksendfax-0.3.2-6mdk.i586.rpm > lyx-1.1.4-7mdk.i586.rpm > /usr/man/man1/lyx.1.bz2 > /usr/man/man1/reLyX.1.bz2 > Lyx doesn't build on my alpha or intel. It requires forms.h. > When is a package that contains forms.h going to be included in cooker? > The following problems have been detected by configure. > Please check the messages below before running 'make'. > (see the section 'Problems' in the INSTALL file) > ** Cannot find libforms or libxforms. Please check that the xforms > library >is correctly installed on your system. > ** Cannot find forms.h. Please check that the forms library >is correctly installed on your system. > === Hope it helps... Stefan
Re: [Cooker] BM --> some more fixes...
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:18:23PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > The lesstif package is difficult... I'll leave it to one of you ;-) Thanks, but rihgt now I'm fighting with openssl, and next on my wishlist is nessus. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] BM --> some more fixes...
> > lesstif-0.91.4-2mdk.i586.rpm > > /usr/doc/lesstif-0.91.4 > > That's a bitch, ain't it? The lesstif package is difficult... I'll leave it to one of you ;-) Stefan
Re: [Cooker] BM --> some more fixes...
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 04:06:31PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > jpilot-Mail-0.0.3-1mdk According to Christopher Molnarc this is already fixed in -2mdk which he said is in the dir (no, I'm not talking about my package). > ttfonts-1.3-6mdk As soon as someone from Mdk moves my package from /incoming to the right dir it's there. > === > Glide_V3-2.60.15-5mdk.i586.rpm > /usr/doc/Glide2/glide_license.txt > /usr/doc/Glide3/glide_license.txt Did that, fix at http://dp.ath.cx/rpms > === > kover-0.4-7mdk.i586.rpm Yup, don't get that to compile either. > === > lesstif-0.91.4-2mdk.i586.rpm > /usr/doc/lesstif-0.91.4 That's a bitch, ain't it? Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
RE: [Cooker] BM fixed packages
> Here are some BM fixed packages... I've uploaded the src.rpm's to > /incoming. Please integrate (if possible). > > thanks!! > > Stefan i'll see if i have time to do it tonight :-) thx -- Geoff
[Fwd: Re: [Cooker] BM]
> > What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? > I think is Big Move ... but may also be Big Mess ;-) I'm sorry, but I disagree with you. Yes, not all packages are "done" yet. The packages that have been done work fine, and in the mean time it's a bit dusty (ever seen a clean construction site?). Anyway, this _could_ quickly change. Take on the challenge and make the list of "todo" packages shorter... http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/cooker/alpha/BM/ http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/cooker/i586/BM/ Applying the macro's isn't that difficult. I do the following (I presume you have setup your useraccount for building as described in the Mandrake RPM HOWTO): 1) I install the current src.rpm rpm -i 2) I run my m.sh script on the specfile m.sh package.spec The first vi editor that is started shows the proposed "patch" to the .spec file. I normally leave it the way it is, but make sure the entries in the %changelog section aren't modified. The second vi editor brings up the patched .spec file. I then bump up the mdk number, add a changelog entry (I beleive people at mandrake have a macro for that, can that be put into the rpm-howto too?) and check the rest of the .spec file. It should be compliant to what is stated in the mdk-rpm-howto. After you exit the second vi editor the package is rebuilt. The output is saved into package.spec.out (nice for later viewing). After it finishes building it tails the .out file. If everyhting goes well it should show an exit 0. You can then answer "y" three times and the .spec .spec.orig .spec.diff and .src.rpm files are copied to your "output" directory (better modify the scrip to suit your needs). This is how I do it. Some packages take little time, others can be very tedious... comments / improvements on this script are welcome (I'm not a scripting hero). And thanks to Chmouel for his perl script. Stefan m.sh macro.sh
Re: [Cooker] BM
--- Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's > mean?? > > I think is Big Move ... but may also be Big Mess > ;-) > > I'm sorry, but I disagree with you. Yes, not all > packages are "done" > yet. The packages that have been done work fine, and > in the mean time > it's a bit dusty (ever seen a clean construction > site?). Anyway, this That was a joke! Actually I think the changes have gone pretty smoothly so far, considering the task at hand. = Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] BM
> > What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? > I think is Big Move ... but may also be Big Mess ;-) I'm sorry, but I disagree with you. Yes, not all packages are "done" yet. The packages that have been done work fine, and in the mean time it's a bit dusty (ever seen a clean construction site?). Anyway, this _could_ quickly change. Take on the challenge and make the list of "todo" packages shorter... http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/cooker/alpha/BM/ http://d10179.dtk.chello.nl/build/cooker/i586/BM/ Applying the macro's isn't that difficult. I do the following (I presume you have setup your useraccount for building as described in the Mandrake RPM HOWTO): 1) I install the current src.rpm rpm -i 2) I run my m.sh script on the specfile m.sh package.spec The first vi editor that is started shows the proposed "patch" to the .spec file. I normally leave it the way it is, but make sure the entries in the %changelog section aren't modified. The second vi editor brings up the patched .spec file. I then bump up the mdk number, add a changelog entry (I beleive people at mandrake have a macro for that, can that be put into the rpm-howto too?) and check the rest of the .spec file. It should be compliant to what is stated in the mdk-rpm-howto. After you exit the second vi editor the package is rebuilt. The output is saved into package.spec.out (nice for later viewing). After it finishes building it tails the .out file. If everyhting goes well it should show an exit 0. You can then answer "y" three times and the .spec .spec.orig .spec.diff and .src.rpm files are copied to your "output" directory (better modify the scrip to suit your needs). This is how I do it. Some packages take little time, others can be very tedious... comments / improvements on this script are welcome (I'm not a scripting hero). And thanks to Chmouel for his perl script. Stefan m.sh macro.sh
Re: [Cooker] BM
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Michael Irving wrote: > What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? > [Uh, this should become a FAQ] Big Move - we turn to FHS compliance and therefore move man, doc and info from /usr to /usr/share. As a side note, this requires the use of a good number of macros for making our RPMs, which is why I also expanded this acronym as "Boring Macros"... you can also read the MDK-RPM-HOWTO, whose unofficial and unwilling maintainter for now is Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). -- Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
Re: [Cooker] BM
--- Michael Irving <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? I think is Big Move ... but may also be Big Mess ;-) = Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] BM
> Michael Irving wrote: > > What does the BM in the changelog of RPM's mean?? Big Move -- Mike & Tracy Holt Kirkland, WA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] BM-ed: ypserv
> > I'll try to upload the src.rpm to ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming/
> i believe it not necessary anymore since titi has did the changes.
negative... I screwed up on that package. the path to makedbm in
/var/yp/Makefile is incorrect in the current cooker package. Fix is
attached.
--- ypserv.spec.origMon Jul 24 19:29:26 2000
+++ ypserv.spec Mon Jul 24 20:13:51 2000
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
%define name ypserv
%define version 1.3.9
-%define release 4mdk
+%define release 5mdk
Summary: The NIS (Network Information Service) server.
Summary(de): NIS/YP-Server
@@ -63,7 +63,12 @@
%build
cp etc/README etc/README.etc
-%configure --enable-tcp-wrapper --enable-fqdn --enable-yppasswd
+%configure \
+ --bindir=/usr/lib/yp \
+ --enable-fqdn \
+ --enable-tcp-wrapper \
+ --enable-yppasswd \
+ --libexecdir=/usr/lib/yp
make
%install
@@ -117,6 +122,9 @@
%{_includedir}/*/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 24 2000 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.3.9-5mdk
+- fixed path of makedbm in /var/yp/Makefile (was broken with 4mdk)
+
* Sun Jul 23 2000 Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.3.9-4mdk
- macroszifications
- BM
%define name ypserv
%define version 1.3.9
%define release 5mdk
Summary: The NIS (Network Information Service) server.
Summary(de): NIS/YP-Server
Summary(fr): Serveur NIS/YP.
Summary(tr): NIS/YP Sunucusu
Url: http://www-vt.uni-paderborn.de/~kukuk/linux/nis.html
Name: %{name}
Version: %{version}
Release: %{release}
Copyright: GPL
Group: System/Servers
Source0: ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/NIS/ypserv-%{PACKAGE_VERSION}.tar.bz2
Source1: ypserv-ypserv.init
Source2: ypserv-yppasswdd.init
Requires: portmap tcp_wrappers
Prereq: /sbin/chkconfig
Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root/
Patch0: patch-ypMakefile.bz2
Patch1: ypserv-Makefile.patch.bz2
Obsoletes: yppasswd
%description
The Network Information Service (NIS) is a system which provides network
information (login names, passwords, home directories, group information)
to all of the machines on a network. NIS can enable users to login on
any machine on the network, as long as the machine has the NIS client
programs running and the user's password is recorded in the NIS passwd
database. NIS was formerly known as Sun Yellow Pages (YP).
This package provides the NIS server, which will need to be running on
your network. NIS clients do not need to be running the server.
Install ypserv if you need an NIS server for your network. You'll also
need to install the yp-tools and ypbind packages onto any NIS client
machines.
%description -l de
ypserv ist eine Implementierung des NIS/YP-Netzwerkprotokolls.
Es ermöglicht die netwerkweite Verteilung von Hostname, Benutzername
und anderen Information. Dies ist der NIS-Server und wird auf NIS-
Clients nicht benötigt.
%description -l fr
ypserv est une implantation du protocole réseau NIS/YP standard.
Il permet une distribution, à l'échelle du réseau, du nom de la machine,
du nom de l'utilisateur et des autres bases de données d"informations.
Il s'agit du serveur NIS et n'est pas nécessaire sur les clients NIS.
%description -l tr
ypserv, standart NIS/YP að protokolünün bir uygulamasýdýr. Bu sunucu ile makina
adý, kullanýcý ismi gibi bilgiler að çapýnda daðýtýlabilir ve bir dizi makina
üzerinde eþ olmasý saðlanabilir. Bu paket sadece sunucuyu içermektedir, bu
hizmetten yararlanacak olan istemci makinalarda bulunmasý gerekmez.
%prep
%setup -q
%patch0 -p1
%patch1 -p1
%build
cp etc/README etc/README.etc
%configure \
--bindir=/usr/lib/yp \
--enable-fqdn \
--enable-tcp-wrapper \
--enable-yppasswd \
--libexecdir=/usr/lib/yp
make
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%makeinstall \
CONFDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} \
MAKEDBMDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/yp \
MAN1DIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1 \
MAN5DIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man5 \
MAN8DIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man8 \
YPBINDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/yp \
YPMAPDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/var/yp
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d
install -m644 etc/ypserv.conf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}
install -m755 $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/ypserv-ypserv.init
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/ypserv
install -m755 $RPM_SOURCE_DIR/ypserv-yppasswdd.init
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%post
/sbin/chkconfig --add ypserv
/sbin/chkconfig --add yppasswdd
%triggerpostun -- ypserv <= ypserv-1.3.0-2
/sbin/chkconfig --add ypserv
%trigerpostun -- yppasswd
/sbin/chkconfig --add yppasswdd
%postun
if [ $1 = 0 ]; then
/sbin/chkconfig --del ypserv
/sbin/chkconfig --del yppasswdd
fi
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
%doc README README.secure INSTALL ChangeLog TODO
%doc etc/ypserv.conf etc/securenets etc/README.etc
%config %{_sysconfdir}/ypserv.conf
%config /var/yp/*
%dir /var/yp
%config %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/*
%{_libdir}/yp
%{_sbindir}/*
%{_mandir}/man5/*
Re: [Cooker] BM-ed: ypserv
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll try to upload the src.rpm to ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming/ i believe it not necessary anymore since titi has did the changes. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel
RE: [Cooker] BM
writes: > > > > > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > > > changelogs? > > > > Big Move. > > > > /usr/man -> /usr/share/man > > /usr/info -> /usr/share/info > > /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc > > why why why...? because of LSB? > no, for FHS compliance, unless you want mandrake tob e the only suck distro that doesn't isn't compliant with FHS ;)
RE: [Cooker] BM
> > > Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the > list. > fhs compliance -- GEoFF
Re: [Cooker] BM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the > list. to comply with FHS.
Re: [Cooker] BM
> > also, man and info is important. > I have a better sugegstion... how about we update the files in > /usr/lib/rpm/alpha-mandrake-linux/ > (/usr/lib/rpm/alpha-mandrake-linux/macros) to reflect the BM situation? Well... easier said than done I guess. i've been looking through the buildoutputs and what strikes me is that I can't find the statement which installs these files. It kind of seems that they are made during the %install and installed right away. What I think is weird is that on intel boxen the macros file is OK, on alpha it isn't. In the Makefile I think this part is responsible for installing it into the dir: chmod u+x ./installplatform; DESTDIR="$(DESTDIR)" pkglibdir="$(pkglib dir)" ./installplatform rpmrc macros platform ; \ $(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)/$(prefix)/src/RPM/RPMS/alpha ;;\ Whatever is going on in there is abracadabra to me, maybe Chmou (or an other Mandrake wizard) can shine his (/her?) magick over it... (I saw chmou's name on a lot of those patches --> he must know how it works ;-) ). Stefan van der Eijk
Re: [Cooker] BM
> also, man and info is important. I have a better sugegstion... how about we update the files in /usr/lib/rpm/alpha-mandrake-linux/ (/usr/lib/rpm/alpha-mandrake-linux/macros) to reflect the BM situation? Stefan
Re: [Cooker] BM
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big > > > Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and > > > /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. > > > > cool... > > > > But: I wish my rpm would start building packages with the files > > in /usr/share/. Which packages do i need to have updated to which > > version in order to make this happen? Until this weekend i used > > to be running a quite up2date cooker box, but things have been > > going _SO_ fast since then... > > i'd say, update rpm-* :) also, man and info is important. -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] BM
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big > > Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and > > /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. > > cool... > > But: I wish my rpm would start building packages with the files > in /usr/share/. Which packages do i need to have updated to which > version in order to make this happen? Until this weekend i used > to be running a quite up2date cooker box, but things have been > going _SO_ fast since then... i'd say, update rpm-* :)
RE: [Cooker] BM
Yes and my 28.8 modem is gonna love this :) On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Christopher Molnar wrote: > > I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big > Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and > /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. > > > > On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Oliver Stieber wrote: > > > by mandrake? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Hoyt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 20 July 2000 16:46 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Cooker] BM > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Alex Boag-Munroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Cooker (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:48 AM > > > Subject: [Cooker] BM > > > > > > > > > > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > > > > changelogs? > > > > > > > > > > Curiously, in American English, BM stands for bowel movement. 8) > > > > > > Hoyt > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [Cooker] BM
> I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big > Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and > /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. cool... But: I wish my rpm would start building packages with the files in /usr/share/. Which packages do i need to have updated to which version in order to make this happen? Until this weekend i used to be running a quite up2date cooker box, but things have been going _SO_ fast since then... Stefan
RE: [Cooker] BM
I was just waiting for someone to say this.. No, it stands for Big Move, it is moving the docs and the man to /usr/share/man and /usr/share/doc and almost forces a re-packaging of every package. On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Oliver Stieber wrote: > by mandrake? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Hoyt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 20 July 2000 16:46 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Cooker] BM > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Alex Boag-Munroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Cooker (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:48 AM > > Subject: [Cooker] BM > > > > > > > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > > > changelogs? > > > > > > > Curiously, in American English, BM stands for bowel movement. 8) > > > > Hoyt > > > > > > > -- --Chris
RE: [Cooker] BM
by mandrake? > -Original Message- > From: Hoyt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 20 July 2000 16:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Cooker] BM > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Alex Boag-Munroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cooker (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:48 AM > Subject: [Cooker] BM > > > > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > > changelogs? > > > > Curiously, in American English, BM stands for bowel movement. 8) > > Hoyt > >
Re: [Cooker] BM
- Original Message - From: "Alex Boag-Munroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cooker (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 6:48 AM Subject: [Cooker] BM > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > changelogs? > Curiously, in American English, BM stands for bowel movement. 8) Hoyt
Re: [Cooker] BM
>Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on IIRC, it's for compliance with FHS Alexander Skwar -- ATTENTION: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS ADDRESS! ONLY REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] My Homepage: http://www.DigitalProjects.com My GPG Key: Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] BM
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Alex Boag-Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > > changelogs? > > Big Move. > > /usr/man -> /usr/share/man > /usr/info -> /usr/share/info > /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc why why why...? because of LSB?
Re: [Cooker] BM
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the > list. > 1. FHS compliance, 2. RH does it. -- Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
Re: [Cooker] BM
Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the list. Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > Alex Boag-Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > > changelogs? > > Big Move. > > /usr/man -> /usr/share/man > /usr/info -> /usr/share/info > /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc > > -- > Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft > http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] BM
Alex Boag-Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > changelogs? Big Move. /usr/man -> /usr/share/man /usr/info -> /usr/share/info /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] BM
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > changelogs? > Big Move - or Boring Macros, too -- Francis Galiegue, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Programming is a race between programmers, who try and make more and more idiot-proof software, and universe, which produces more and more remarkable idiots. Until now, universe leads the race" -- R. Cook
