Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-10 Thread Andrej Borsenkow


Do you have both WinME and Linux on the same (first) disk? I have Windows
on the first, Linux on the second and never had any problem - I've
reinstalled Windows umpteens of time and used WindowsUpdate and nothing
evil ever happened.

But the second disk has only extended partition and Windows fdisk freezes
at start :-)


On 9 May 2001, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:

 Whew -- That's two reassuring votes that maybe it is something about
 my machine and not endemic to Windows Update.

 The other variables are that I run a Dell, which has a custom feature
 where it snapshots the Registry (and maybe more); it also has a
 suspend mode switch in the shutdown menu (why, I don't know)
  ^^  ^

Are you kidding?
-andrej





Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-10 Thread Alexander Skwar

So sprach S B am Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:24:56PM -:

Sorry?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:   http://www.digitalprojects.com   |   http://www.iso-top.de
   iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
Uptime: 13 hours 46 minutes




Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-10 Thread Gary Lawrence Murphy


I am running WinME and Linux on the same disk in a Dell L700CX;
Windows is /dev/hda1, swap is /dev/hda2 and linux is the third
partition.

I still wonder if there is any way to declare the disk partition table
as read-only (password protected?)

-- 
Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723
T(C)Inc Business Innovations through Open Source http://www.teledyn.com
KernelWiki Community Linux Docs: http://kernelbook.sourceforge.net/wiki




Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-10 Thread Alan Olsen

I have seen similar comments on the kernel list.

For that reason and others (the heavy handed copy protection, for one), I
will not install Me on any system I own.

When I install Windows it is on a seperate removable disk drive.

On 9 May 2001, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:

 
 This is anecdotal because it only happened once and I really don't want
 to repeat the experiment (esp since it was the wife's machine ;)
 
 Here's what we did:
 
 1) Booted to the WinME partition and selected the inviting WindowsUpdate
link on the Start menu.
 
 2) This launched explorer to a friendly Microsoft page listing the
updates we needed; chose the one highly recommended and no other
optional packs.  This offered certificates, sent software and ran
through the updates, never explaining what was changed or why beyond
that first executive summary.
 
 3) This required a reboot of Windows, so we did.
 
 4) Noticed, long after explorer was shut down, frequent packets going out
to a microsoft page at akadns.net, so we shut down Windows to reboot
Mandrake 8.0
 
 5) Mandrake boots to LILO screen, but selecting Linux halts on a
cannot read HD error
 
 6) Booted the rescue image from the CD -- sure enough, the partition
table had been trashed; the swap partition was now Extended and the
Linux partition unknown, and the sizes may have been changed. Fdisk
reported extra content at the end of /dev/hda5.
 
 7) Tried using fdisk to put the partition types back to the right types
(although I can't be certain the sized hadn't changed because I didn't
record them from before) but this does not fix the problem; e2fsck
says one partition is 0-length and the other has bad superblocks.
 
 Is there _anything_ we can do to protect against this sort of
 malicious anti-competition attack?  Can we write-protect the partition
 table or back it up or otherwise prevent some other OS from
 undermining our installation?
 
 It's pretty bad news for Linux if we must tell dual-boot users that by
 running Linux, they can never update their Windows partition.
 
 -- 
 Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]  TeleDynamics Communications Inc
 Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
 Computers are useless.  They can only give you answers.(Pablo Picasso)
 
 
 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Note to AOL users: for a quick shortcut to reply
Alan Olsen| to my mail, just hit the ctrl, alt and del keys.
In the future, everything will have its 15 minutes of blame.





Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-10 Thread JJ

Same here, I've had Mandrake on my other partition (ext2) since
win95---winME, and have used windows update with no problems, we,
no problems with the ext2 partition, or Lilo..
Cheers,
JJ

S B wrote:





 I have been running WinME, 2K with many update successfully, without
 it affecting my other partition. Have you been able to repro this at
 all? Maybe someone can chime in and let me know if I am just lucky.
  From: Gary Lawrence Murphy
 Reply-To: Gary Lawrence Murphy
 To: Mandrake Cooker
 Subject: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows
 partitions
 Date: 09 May 2001 16:19:46 -0400
 
 
 This is anecdotal because it only happened once and I really don't
 want
 to repeat the experiment (esp since it was the wife's machine ;)
 
 Here's what we did:
 
 1) Booted to the WinME partition and selected the inviting
 WindowsUpdate
  link on the Start menu.
 
 2) This launched explorer to a friendly Microsoft page listing the
  updates we needed; chose the one highly recommended and no other
  optional packs. This offered certificates, sent software and ran
  through the updates, never explaining what was changed or why beyond

  that first executive summary.
 
 3) This required a reboot of Windows, so we did.
 
 4) Noticed, long after explorer was shut down, frequent packets going
 out
  to a microsoft page at akadns.net, so we shut down Windows to reboot

  Mandrake 8.0
 
 5) Mandrake boots to LILO screen, but selecting Linux halts on a
  cannot read HD error
 
 6) Booted the rescue image from the CD -- sure enough, the partition
  table had been trashed; the swap partition was now Extended and
 the
  Linux partition unknown, and the sizes may have been changed.
 Fdisk
  reported extra content at the end of /dev/hda5.
 
 7) Tried using fdisk to put the partition types back to the right
 types
  (although I can't be certain the sized hadn't changed because I
 didn't
  record them from before) but this does not fix the problem; e2fsck
  says one partition is 0-length and the other has bad superblocks.
 
 Is there _anything_ we can do to protect against this sort of
 malicious anti-competition attack? Can we write-protect the partition

 table or back it up or otherwise prevent some other OS from
 undermining our installation?
 
 It's pretty bad news for Linux if we must tell dual-boot users that
 by
 running Linux, they can never update their Windows partition.
 
 --
 Gary Lawrence Murphy TeleDynamics Communications Inc
 Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems:
 http://www.teledyn.com
 Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.(Pablo
 Picasso)
 
 

 ---
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com





Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-10 Thread Simon Peter Nicholls

I've had exactly the same corruption we're talking about on two of my 
machines, but they were both running win98 second edition plus updates. 
No amount of fiddling would fix the partitions. At the time I had my 
suspicions it was scandisk doing the dirty deed. Now I keep windows 
trussed up in a little virtual machine file - only need it for 
Dreamweaver ultradev now.

I tried to find a utility to lock the partition table when running 
under windows but failed - anyone know anything?

Cheers,
Si.

JJ wrote:

 Same here, I've had Mandrake on my other partition (ext2) since
 win95---winME, and have used windows update with no problems, we,
 no problems with the ext2 partition, or Lilo..
 Cheers,
 JJ
 





Re: Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-10 Thread Kyle Jacobs

Again, there are no Windows update service packs, or other 
Windowsupdate critical updates that modify a volumes MBR.  To 
do so might interfere with the existing Windows boot (or 
alternative method used to boot windows) and create a totaly 
unbootable system.

If you can recall the instance where the MBR was corrupted or 
damaged, or more spificaly, WHICH crticial update you installed 
created the problem, reporting it as a bug to Microsoft would 
be a prudent step.

To report a critical update bug, use the Windows report tool in 
the System Information application (Programs/Accessories/System 
Tools/System Information).  



 On Thu, 10 May 2001, Simon Peter Nicholls 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 I've had exactly the same corruption we're talking about on 
two of my 
 machines, but they were both running win98 second edition 
plus updates. 
 No amount of fiddling would fix the partitions. At the time I 
had my 
 suspicions it was scandisk doing the dirty deed. Now I keep 
windows 
 trussed up in a little virtual machine file - only need it 
for 
 Dreamweaver ultradev now.
 
 I tried to find a utility to lock the partition table when 
running 
 under windows but failed - anyone know anything?
 
 Cheers,
 Si.
 
 JJ wrote:
 
  Same here, I've had Mandrake on my other partition 
(ext2) since
  win95---winME, and have used windows update with no 
problems,
 we,
  no problems with the ext2 partition, or Lilo..
  Cheers,
  JJ
  
 
 
 
 





Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-09 Thread David Relson

Gary,

Windows has a long history of taking over a machine during installs and 
such.  Seems like, back in the days of OS/2, it would say something like I 
notice you have another operating system on your computer.  Should I remove 
it?  Of course the proper answer was Yes because who, in their right 
mind, would want to run something else.

David

David Relson   Osage Software Systems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Ann Arbor, MI 48103
www.osagesoftware.com  tel:  734.821.8800





Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-09 Thread S B


I have been running WinME, 2K with many update successfully, without it affecting my other partition. Have you been able to repro this at all? Maybe someone can chime in and let me know if I am just lucky. 

From: Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mandrake Cooker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions 
Date: 09 May 2001 16:19:46 -0400 
 
 
This is anecdotal because it only happened once and I really don't want 
to repeat the experiment (esp since it was the wife's machine ;) 
 
Here's what we did: 
 
1) Booted to the WinME partition and selected the inviting WindowsUpdate 
 link on the Start menu. 
 
2) This launched explorer to a friendly Microsoft page listing the 
 updates we needed; chose the one highly recommended and no other 
 optional packs. This offered certificates, sent software and ran 
 through the updates, never explaining what was changed or why beyond 
 that first executive summary. 
 
3) This required a reboot of Windows, so we did. 
 
4) Noticed, long after explorer was shut down, frequent packets going out 
 to a microsoft page at akadns.net, so we shut down Windows to reboot 
 Mandrake 8.0 
 
5) Mandrake boots to LILO screen, but selecting Linux halts on a 
 "cannot read HD error" 
 
6) Booted the rescue image from the CD -- sure enough, the partition 
 table had been trashed; the swap partition was now "Extended" and the 
 Linux partition "unknown", and the sizes may have been changed. Fdisk 
 reported "extra content" at the end of /dev/hda5. 
 
7) Tried using fdisk to put the partition types back to the right types 
 (although I can't be certain the sized hadn't changed because I didn't 
 record them from before) but this does not fix the problem; e2fsck 
 says one partition is 0-length and the other has bad superblocks. 
 
Is there _anything_ we can do to protect against this sort of 
malicious anti-competition attack? Can we write-protect the partition 
table or back it up or otherwise prevent some "other" OS from 
undermining our installation? 
 
It's pretty bad news for Linux if we must tell dual-boot users that by 
running Linux, they can never update their Windows partition. 
 
-- 
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>TeleDynamics Communications Inc 
Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com 
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso) 
 
 
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-09 Thread Gary Lawrence Murphy

Whew -- That's two reassuring votes that maybe it is something about
my machine and not endemic to Windows Update.  

The other variables are that I run a Dell, which has a custom feature
where it snapshots the Registry (and maybe more); it also has a
suspend mode switch in the shutdown menu (why, I don't know) which
we've never used, but that doesn't mean it didn't try to update it.

-- 
Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723
T(C)Inc Business Innovations through Open Source http://www.teledyn.com
KernelWiki Community Linux Docs: http://kernelbook.sourceforge.net/wiki




Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-09 Thread Gary Lawrence Murphy

 D == David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

D Gary, Windows has a long history of taking over a machine
D during installs and such.

That much I'd known: Win95's install, unlike all other MsDOS software,
took the first _partition_ (rather than the first _dos_ partition) to
be drive C.  That got me this time is that it was a stupid _update_
that had no business messing with the partitions.

When we first booted the Mandrake 8.0b install and found the question
Windows partition detected.  Remove it? as the first option, both
my brother and I cheered ;)


-- 
Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723
T(C)Inc Business Innovations through Open Source http://www.teledyn.com
KernelWiki Community Linux Docs: http://kernelbook.sourceforge.net/wiki




Re: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows partitions

2001-05-09 Thread Alan Olsen

On Wed, 9 May 2001, S B wrote:

 I have been running WinME, 2K with many update successfully, without it
 affecting my other partition. Have you been able to repro this at all?
 Maybe someone can chime in and let me know if I am just lucky.

Did you have an extended partition with multiple partition types?  That
seems to be a leading place where the problem has been observed.

 
 From: Gary Lawrence Murphy
 Reply-To: Gary Lawrence Murphy
 To: Mandrake Cooker
 Subject: [Cooker] DANGER: WinME update may trash all non-Windows
 partitions
 Date: 09 May 2001 16:19:46 -0400
 
 
 This is anecdotal because it only happened once and I really don't want
 to repeat the experiment (esp since it was the wife's machine ;)
 
 Here's what we did:
 
 1) Booted to the WinME partition and selected the inviting WindowsUpdate
  link on the Start menu.
 
 2) This launched explorer to a friendly Microsoft page listing the
  updates we needed; chose the one highly recommended and no other
  optional packs. This offered certificates, sent software and ran
  through the updates, never explaining what was changed or why beyond
  that first executive summary.
 
 3) This required a reboot of Windows, so we did.
 
 4) Noticed, long after explorer was shut down, frequent packets going
 out
  to a microsoft page at akadns.net, so we shut down Windows to reboot
  Mandrake 8.0
 
 5) Mandrake boots to LILO screen, but selecting Linux halts on a
  cannot read HD error
 
 6) Booted the rescue image from the CD -- sure enough, the partition
  table had been trashed; the swap partition was now Extended and the
  Linux partition unknown, and the sizes may have been changed. Fdisk
  reported extra content at the end of /dev/hda5.
 
 7) Tried using fdisk to put the partition types back to the right types
  (although I can't be certain the sized hadn't changed because I didn't
  record them from before) but this does not fix the problem; e2fsck
  says one partition is 0-length and the other has bad superblocks.
 
 Is there _anything_ we can do to protect against this sort of
 malicious anti-competition attack? Can we write-protect the partition
 table or back it up or otherwise prevent some other OS from
 undermining our installation?
 
 It's pretty bad news for Linux if we must tell dual-boot users that by
 running Linux, they can never update their Windows partition.
 
 --
 Gary Lawrence Murphy TeleDynamics Communications Inc
 Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
 Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.(Pablo Picasso)
 
 
 
 
 
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
 
 
 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Note to AOL users: for a quick shortcut to reply
Alan Olsen| to my mail, just hit the ctrl, alt and del keys.
In the future, everything will have its 15 minutes of blame.