Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-30 Thread gandalf

On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 11:12, Frederic Bastok wrote:

 
 StarOffice 6 final will be available in PowerPack and Prosuite without any 
 additionnal costs. This is the full version in 5 languages.
 In the next days, you should hear about another way to get StarOffice from 
 Mandrake (final and full version). Wait  see Mandrake's PR.
 Of course, I won't (and nobody will at Mandrake) answer any questions 
 regarding the agreement with SUN to distribute it or comments rumors like Is 
 SUN buying Mandrake ? Perhaps it is true, perhaps it is wrong ? :-)

Anyway, it's SUNs interest to have as many people as possible using
StarOffice... After all, they are fighting the Big Microsoft Giant...
And having it licensed to Linux distributors for inclusion in boxed
distribution is a good thing for both (Sun and Linux company). It's
using Linux market to infiltrate Windows Market (for places where both
enviroments are in use).

-- 
Denis Moreaux

ICQ#2012432 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTTP:   http://endor.be/[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-28 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Tuesday 26 March 2002 17:45, you wrote:
 On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 09:31, Frederic Bastok wrote:
  Taken for the EULA:
  2. Linux End User License To Use. Subject to the terms and conditions of
  this Agreement, if you are a Linux operating system end user and you
  received the Software as part of a Linux operating system bundle, Sun
  grants you a non-exclusive and non-transferable license for the internal
  use only of the accompanying unmodified binary form of the Software.

 Actually, that is what I'm afraid of. I'm not the only end-user. I'm an
 admin and wanted to know what kind of licensing for this and Hancom for
 multiple users in a company.

For StarOffice, you can put on an unlimited number of computers in your 
company, you only pay one license (if you buy it from Mandrake).
For Handcom, I don't know


-- 

Frederic Bastok





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-26 Thread David Walser


--- Frederic Bastok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 we don't have any plans for a sparc version

:~(

What would it take for one to be created?

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/




Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-26 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Tuesday 26 March 2002 01:17, you wrote:
 On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 16:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
  Final version, of course.

 What does your OEM agreement say about licensing? One install per
 download, or one install per multiple of $120, or multiple installs but
 only for personal use of the MdkClub member, or... (?)

 I would love to not be posting to the #$@#!! cooker list about this,
 but since Mdk has awful contact info on their sites.

Taken for the EULA:
2. Linux End User License To Use. Subject to the terms and conditions of 
this Agreement, if you are a Linux operating system end user and you received 
the Software as part of a Linux operating system bundle, Sun grants you a 
non-exclusive and non-transferable license for the internal use only of the 
accompanying unmodified binary form of the Software.

So you pay once and you can put it on every computers

-- 

Frederic Bastok





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-26 Thread Brad Felmey

On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 09:31, Frederic Bastok wrote:

 Taken for the EULA:
 2. Linux End User License To Use. Subject to the terms and conditions of 
 this Agreement, if you are a Linux operating system end user and you received 
 the Software as part of a Linux operating system bundle, Sun grants you a 
 non-exclusive and non-transferable license for the internal use only of the 
 accompanying unmodified binary form of the Software.

Actually, that is what I'm afraid of. I'm not the only end-user. I'm an
admin and wanted to know what kind of licensing for this and Hancom for
multiple users in a company.

I've sent queries to Denis, but no answers. sigh
-- 
Brad Felmey





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-26 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Tuesday 26 March 2002 00:55, you wrote:
 --- Frederic Bastok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  we don't have any plans for a sparc version
 
 :~(

 What would it take for one to be created?

time, ressources and money.
usually we say that porting Mandrake to a new platform costs 40% of the 
global budget. The last 60% come from supporting platform in the long term 
(security update and so on).

-- 

Frederic Bastok





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-25 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Saturday 23 March 2002 16:01, you wrote:
 On Friday 22 March 2002 18:12, Frederic Bastok wrote:
  Of course, I won't (and nobody will at Mandrake) answer any questions
  regarding the agreement with SUN to distribute it or comments rumors like
  Is SUN buying Mandrake ? Perhaps it is true, perhaps it is wrong ? :-)

 It must be true, I emailed Sun about 3 months ago and suggested it. (-:

 Would that help or hinder the release of Mandrake 8.2 for Sparc? I ask
 because I may soon be faced with adminning some Sun Blades, and would
 rather admin Linux than Solaris, and am more familiar with Mandrake than
 Debian.

we don't have any plans for a sparc version

-- 

Frederic Bastok





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-25 Thread Stefan van der Eijk



Of course, I won't (and nobody will at Mandrake) answer any questions
regarding the agreement with SUN to distribute it or comments rumors like
Is SUN buying Mandrake ? Perhaps it is true, perhaps it is wrong ? :-)


It must be true, I emailed Sun about 3 months ago and suggested it. (-:

Would that help or hinder the release of Mandrake 8.2 for Sparc?

Go ahead. Install RedHat  start porting cooker yourself. Nobody is 
going to stop you :-)

Stefan





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-25 Thread Brad Felmey

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 16:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:

 Final version, of course.

What does your OEM agreement say about licensing? One install per
download, or one install per multiple of $120, or multiple installs but
only for personal use of the MdkClub member, or... (?)

I would love to not be posting to the #$@#!! cooker list about this,
but since Mdk has awful contact info on their sites.
-- 
Brad Felmey





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-25 Thread Timothy R. Butler

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
 It must be true, I emailed Sun about 3 months ago and suggested it. (-:

  So long as Sun let the Mandrakers stay semi-independent, it probably 
*would* be a good thing. Certainly Sun could help move Linux to higher end 
systems, and have a suitable replacement to offer as more and more people 
move away from Solaris.
  For Mandrake, it would mean they probably would have enough funds to go on 
for a long time, would finally get a working out-of-the-box Java setup for 
Konqi, and would have the opportunity to support highend boxen.

 Would that help or hinder the release of Mandrake 8.2 for Sparc? I ask
 because I may soon be faced with adminning some Sun Blades, and would
 rather admin Linux than Solaris, and am more familiar with Mandrake than
 Debian.

  Hmm... Debian isn't so bad if you can get past the installation. Otherwise, 
I did a search on Google, and turned up the fact that you can download SuSE 
Linux 7.3 for SPARC (ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/sparc/7.3/iso/)... you can 
also read more Linux/SPARC stuff at http://www.ultralinux.org/ .

  -Tim

- - -- 
- - 
Timothy R. Butler[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Universal  Networks   http://www.uninet.info
Christian Portal and Search Tool:   http://www.faithtree.com
Open Source Migration Guide:  http://www.ofb.biz
= Christian Web Services Since 1996 ==
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8n4OFK37Cns9gJ0gRAoAiAJ4qi3upOEMAB5u3dTduLDa/3WO7zACgkX0K
wKMODKqwMAcEMrQfvP3gRXg=
=aSzr
- -END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8n/TKK37Cns9gJ0gRAmFJAJ0Yp8VLM4vIb/ZAXMnnl35X0JMwPACfUZNl
hATnZY//VfuJWLVATlFIhJE=
=dv38
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-23 Thread Leon Brooks

On Friday 22 March 2002 18:12, Frederic Bastok wrote:
 Of course, I won't (and nobody will at Mandrake) answer any questions
 regarding the agreement with SUN to distribute it or comments rumors like
 Is SUN buying Mandrake ? Perhaps it is true, perhaps it is wrong ? :-)

It must be true, I emailed Sun about 3 months ago and suggested it. (-:

Would that help or hinder the release of Mandrake 8.2 for Sparc? I ask 
because I may soon be faced with adminning some Sun Blades, and would rather 
admin Linux than Solaris, and am more familiar with Mandrake than Debian.

Cheers; Leon




Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-22 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Thursday 21 March 2002 18:11, Timothy R. Butler wrote:
  I thought no comment just meant that I would not answer the question
  No ?

   Is it that you personally don't know/want to answer the question, or all
 of MandrakeSoft can't? I'd sure hate to get my PowerPack and find out I
 have to pay another hundred bucks to use the copy of StarOffice that was
 suppose to be included... If SO6 is an additional cost, Mandrake should
 *really* fix that page on their site, because it would be very deceptive.
   Then again, I can't imagine MandrakeSoft doing something like that...
 wild speculationMaybe Sun is buying Mandrake and so Mandrake doesn't have
 to pay licensing fees?/wild speculation

StarOffice 6 final will be available in PowerPack and Prosuite without any 
additionnal costs. This is the full version in 5 languages.
In the next days, you should hear about another way to get StarOffice from 
Mandrake (final and full version). Wait  see Mandrake's PR.
Of course, I won't (and nobody will at Mandrake) answer any questions 
regarding the agreement with SUN to distribute it or comments rumors like Is 
SUN buying Mandrake ? Perhaps it is true, perhaps it is wrong ? :-)

-- 

Frederic Bastok





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-22 Thread trax

I respect mdk, will not answer what deal they have made.
The reason why I asked it, was will it be a full license, i.e. for
commercial use. 

On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 19:20, andre wrote:
 Op donderdag 21 maart 2002 12:51, schreef u:
  That's interesting, are you not commenting on 'what is that supposed
  to mean?' or are you just explaing that no comment means exactly
  the same as 'no comment', which ofcourse the asker of the
  question already understood.
 
  Therefore, assuming that you do not want to comment on the question
  what no comment means, can you answer why you cannot comment on this
  question?
 
  :-Danny
 
  On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Frederic Bastok wrote:
   On Thursday 21 March 2002 00:58, you wrote:
4:25pm... Frederic Bastok ran for the door shrieking:
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
 So is MDK paying the license fee then?

No comment
   
What's that supposed to mean?
  
   No comment
 
 I don't think you should ask what deal Mandrake has made with Sun because you 
 know that that question wont be answered. 
 
 Only question i have is it a full license (exept maybe that mdk does the 
 support) or are is it a lesser license




_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-22 Thread Levi Ramsey

On Thu Mar 21  9:14 +0100, trax wrote:
 I commented, as I hear Sun will charge around $100 for the license.
 So how MDK will include this, seems a fair bit of whack.

It's fairly standard to offer bulk licensees a vastly reduced price.
With several thousand users, Mandrake probably has to pay something, but
less than $100.

This is kind of similar to M$'s bulk discounts (especially to OEMs).  I
would doubt that Dell or Gateway pays more than $40 for Windows or $75
for Office.

-- 
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When it comes down to desperation,
You make the best of your situation.
Linux 2.4.17-20mdk
 12:01am  up 1 day,  6:35,  7 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00




Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-21 Thread trax

I commented, as I hear Sun will charge around $100 for the license.
So how MDK will include this, seems a fair bit of whack.

On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 00:58, Michael Holt wrote:
 4:25pm... Frederic Bastok ran for the door shrieking:
 
 On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
  So is MDK paying the license fee then?
 
 No comment
 
 What's that supposed to mean?
 
 Mike
 
 -- 
 Michael  Tracy Holt
 Kirkland, WA[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.holt-tech.net   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ===
 Unix is all about taking big rocks and turning them into little rocks -
 Windows is all about taking sand... and dumping it in your gas tank...
 
 




_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-21 Thread David Barker

i got this mail recently


***
 PRIVACY STATEMENT This message has been sent to you on behalf of Sun
 Microsystems, Inc. using MarketModel's e-mail service. This message is being
 sent to those of you who downloaded StarOffice beta software that is set to
 expire. Sun Microsystems values your online time and privacy. To stop 
receiving such messages, particularly those sent in these exceptional 
circumstances, please click here to be removed from the mailing list.
 If you have any questions regarding our privacy policy, please visit
 http://www.sun.com/privacy/ or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have any
 questions regarding this e-mail, please send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

 Dear StarOffice 6.0 Beta Software User,
 
As beta products are designed to run for a limited period of time, the
 StarOffice 6.0 beta product is set to expire on Sunday, March 31, 2002. Sun 
is providing a free patch to extend the life of the beta software until
 June 3. Please visit http://www.sun.com/staroffice/so6beta_patch.html to 
download the
 StarOffice 6.0 Beta software patch.
 
The beta patch will help you avoid interruptions to any of the StarOffice 6..0
 Beta applications you may be using. The patch will keep your software running
 and ease the transition from the beta product to the final retail product,
 planned for release in May. Again, the patch download can be found at
 http://www..sun.com/staroffice/so6beta_patch.html.
 
Thank you.
 
The StarOffice Team
 
Copyright 2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Sun, Sun
 Microsystems, and StarOffice, are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun
 Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries.
 

 Powered by MarketModels  


it says in it May, which will be quite a wait for the pro  power pack 
editions... 

On Wednesday 20 March 2002 3:25 pm, you wrote:
 On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
  So is MDK paying the license fee then?

 No comment

  On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 23:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
   Hi,
  
only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a
BETA Version???
  
   Final version, of course. Sun will announce StarOffice 6.0 soonish this
   week.
  
   Bye,
   Gwenole.
 
  _
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-21 Thread danny

That's interesting, are you not commenting on 'what is that supposed
to mean?' or are you just explaing that no comment means exactly 
the same as 'no comment', which ofcourse the asker of the 
question already understood.

Therefore, assuming that you do not want to comment on the question
what no comment means, can you answer why you cannot comment on this 
question?

:-Danny

On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Frederic Bastok wrote:

 On Thursday 21 March 2002 00:58, you wrote:
  4:25pm... Frederic Bastok ran for the door shrieking:
  On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
   So is MDK paying the license fee then?
  
  No comment
 
  What's that supposed to mean?
 
 No comment
 
 





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-21 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Thursday 21 March 2002 12:51, you wrote:
 That's interesting, are you not commenting on 'what is that supposed
 to mean?' or are you just explaing that no comment means exactly
 the same as 'no comment', which ofcourse the asker of the
 question already understood.

 Therefore, assuming that you do not want to comment on the question
 what no comment means, can you answer why you cannot comment on this
 question?

 :-Danny

I thought no comment just meant that I would not answer the question
No ?

 On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Frederic Bastok wrote:
  On Thursday 21 March 2002 00:58, you wrote:
   4:25pm... Frederic Bastok ran for the door shrieking:
   On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
So is MDK paying the license fee then?
   
   No comment
  
   What's that supposed to mean?
 
  No comment

-- 

Frederic Bastok





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-21 Thread Timothy R. Butler


 I thought no comment just meant that I would not answer the question
 No ?

  Is it that you personally don't know/want to answer the question, or all of 
MandrakeSoft can't? I'd sure hate to get my PowerPack and find out I have to 
pay another hundred bucks to use the copy of StarOffice that was suppose to 
be included... If SO6 is an additional cost, Mandrake should *really* fix 
that page on their site, because it would be very deceptive.
  Then again, I can't imagine MandrakeSoft doing something like that... wild 
speculationMaybe Sun is buying Mandrake and so Mandrake doesn't have to pay 
licensing fees?/wild speculation

  -Tim

-- 

Timothy R. Butler[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Universal  Networks   http://www.uninet.info
Christian Portal and Search Tool:   http://www.faithtree.com
Open Source Migration Guide:  http://www.ofb.biz
= Christian Web Services Since 1996 ==




Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-21 Thread andre

Op donderdag 21 maart 2002 12:51, schreef u:
 That's interesting, are you not commenting on 'what is that supposed
 to mean?' or are you just explaing that no comment means exactly
 the same as 'no comment', which ofcourse the asker of the
 question already understood.

 Therefore, assuming that you do not want to comment on the question
 what no comment means, can you answer why you cannot comment on this
 question?

 :-Danny

 On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Frederic Bastok wrote:
  On Thursday 21 March 2002 00:58, you wrote:
   4:25pm... Frederic Bastok ran for the door shrieking:
   On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
So is MDK paying the license fee then?
   
   No comment
  
   What's that supposed to mean?
 
  No comment

I don't think you should ask what deal Mandrake has made with Sun because you 
know that that question wont be answered. 

Only question i have is it a full license (exept maybe that mdk does the 
support) or are is it a lesser license




Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-21 Thread Timothy R. Butler


 I don't think you should ask what deal Mandrake has made with Sun because
 you know that that question wont be answered.

 Only question i have is it a full license (exept maybe that mdk does the
 support) or are is it a lesser license

  Yes, I agree. It seems only fair to know what we are buying when we 
purchase a powerpack.

 - Tim

-- 

Timothy R. Butler[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Universal  Networks   http://www.uninet.info
Christian Portal and Search Tool:   http://www.faithtree.com
Open Source Migration Guide:  http://www.ofb.biz
= Christian Web Services Since 1996 ==




Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-21 Thread Martin


 I don't think you should ask what deal Mandrake has made with
Sun because you
 know that that question wont be answered.

 Only question i have is it a full license (exept maybe that mdk
does the
 support) or are is it a lesser license

I think it is the good question.
When you buy the powerpack, do you have a full version of SO 6.0
?
Because, If it is the true, when I can buy the powerpack :-))

JP







Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-20 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Tuesday 19 March 2002 23:25, you wrote:
 Hi,

 only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
 StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a BETA
 Version???

 Michael

Final :-)

-- 

Frederic Bastok





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-20 Thread trax

So is MDK paying the license fee then?

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 23:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
 Hi,
 
  only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
  StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a BETA
  Version???
 
 Final version, of course. Sun will announce StarOffice 6.0 soonish this 
 week.
 
 Bye,
 Gwenole.
 




_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-20 Thread Frederic Bastok

On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
 So is MDK paying the license fee then?

No comment

 On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 23:38, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
  Hi,
 
   only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
   StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a BETA
   Version???
 
  Final version, of course. Sun will announce StarOffice 6.0 soonish this
  week.
 
  Bye,
  Gwenole.

 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-- 

Frederic Bastok





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-20 Thread Michael Holt

4:25pm... Frederic Bastok ran for the door shrieking:

On Wednesday 20 March 2002 13:28, you wrote:
 So is MDK paying the license fee then?

No comment

What's that supposed to mean?

Mike

-- 
Michael  Tracy Holt
Kirkland, WA[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.holt-tech.net   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Unix is all about taking big rocks and turning them into little rocks -
Windows is all about taking sand... and dumping it in your gas tank...






Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-19 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne

Hi,

 only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
 StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a BETA
 Version???

Final version, of course. Sun will announce StarOffice 6.0 soonish this 
week.

Bye,
Gwenole.





Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-19 Thread civileme

Michael Braun wrote:

Hi,

only a short question. Will Mandrake really put a full version of
StarOffice 6.0 in there PowerPack or ProPack or would it be a BETA
Version???

Michael




It's real, not beta, according to SUN.  Whether you consider it BETA or 
not is up to you.

Civileme







Re: [Cooker] MDK 8.2 and StarOffice 6

2002-03-19 Thread Kevin Krumwiede

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 19:53, Timothy R. Butler wrote:
 
  It's real, not beta, according to SUN.  Whether you consider it BETA or
  not is up to you.
 
   OpenOffice is on one of the PowerPack CD's too, right?

OpenOffice is on disc 3 of the download edition.  (At least it was in
beta 4.)