Re: [Cooker] Re: [Frozen-CHRPM] bluefish-0.5-6mdk
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 03:29:38PM +0800, Geoffrey Lee wrote: Yes, but it is (still) just an Editor .. AFAIK, we don't have too many editors in LM, the main point of group is to let you find the packages qiuckly and easily, so maybe Editors would also be OK ... I whole heartedly agree. But as Daoudo sp? Daouda :) -- Daouda LO MandrakeSoft SA
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Frozen-CHRPM] bluefish-0.5-6mdk
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Daouda LO wrote: specially designed for html editing . Sure, but you may create your usual shell scripts/C source/whatever with it. Yes, it is specialized for this, this kinda makes it fit. The Networking/WWW group isn't the perfect group but we don't have a better choice . We should perhaps create a New Group under Application named Specifical Editor or whatelse . Hmm, Editors/Specialized? Editors/WWW? No, this would be to specific, there aren't yet that many. When there will be many, one might think about splitting it up again. I'd vote for Editors/Specialized. So discussion is opened... BTW: klyx is also in the wrong location. If lyx goes to "Office", klyx should go there as well. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Frozen-CHRPM] bluefish-0.5-6mdk
Yo, On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 08:49:11AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Daouda LO wrote: specially designed for html editing . Sure, but you may create your usual shell scripts/C source/whatever with it. Yes, it is specialized for this, this kinda makes it fit. The Networking/WWW group isn't the perfect group but we don't have a better choice . We should perhaps create a New Group under Application named Specifical Editor or whatelse . Hmm, Editors/Specialized? Editors/WWW? No, this would be to specific, there aren't yet that many. When there will be many, one might think about splitting it up again. I'd vote for Editors/Specialized. Yes, but it is (still) just an Editor .. AFAIK, we don't have too many editors in LM, the main point of group is to let you find the packages qiuckly and easily, so maybe Editors would also be OK ... -- Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] §õªø· ~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant. http://devel.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk "7 days of honeymoon makes one whole week."
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Frozen-CHRPM] bluefish-0.5-6mdk
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 05:45:00PM +0200, Daouda Lo wrote: --=-=-= Name: bluefish Relocations: (not relocateable) Group : Networking/WWWSource RPM: (none) Summary : A WYSIWYG GPLized HTML editor Again: I don't think that this is the right Group for such a tool. bluefish is an editor, specially designed for html editing . that's it. It doesn't have that much to do with Networking or the WWW in particular. Just because you may create web pages with it, doesn't mean IMO that it should be put in this group. Or would you put vim, xemacs, kedit also there? You should, as you can create web pages with it... The Networking/WWW group isn't the perfect group but we don't have a better choice . We should perhaps create a New Group under Application named Specifical Editor or whatelse . So discussion is opened... -- Daouda LO MandrakeSoft SA
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Frozen-CHRPM] bluefish-0.5-6mdk
Hi Daouda! On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Daouda LO wrote: Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 05:45:00PM +0200, Daouda Lo wrote: --=-=-= Name: bluefish Relocations: (not relocateable) Group : Networking/WWWSource RPM: (none) Summary : A WYSIWYG GPLized HTML editor Again: I don't think that this is the right Group for such a tool. bluefish is an editor, Hmm, my version is still: Name: bluefish Relocations: (not relocateable) Group : Editors Source RPM: bluefish-0.5-4mdk.src.rpm But it's also more than a week old ;-) I find that group prefectly ok! put vim, xemacs, kedit also there? You should, as you can create web pages with it... The Networking/WWW group isn't the perfect group but we don't have a better choice . We should perhaps create a New Group under Application named Specifical Editor or whatelse . So discussion is opened... No, either it is Editors (useful as HTML files are nothing else than text files) or it is publishing/office type of application. As the description says it is an HTML editor, I would do it to the Editors group. Best regards, Reinhard Katzmann -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] New GnuPG Public Key available on request Projekte: Suche nach einem Diplomarbeitsthema für das WS 2000/2001 Datenbankanbindung und Demonstrationsserver für Pincity PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Frozen-CHRPM] bluefish-0.5-6mdk
Yo, On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 06:21:14PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 05:45:00PM +0200, Daouda Lo wrote: --=-=-= Name: bluefish Relocations: (not relocateable) Group : Networking/WWWSource RPM: (none) Summary : A WYSIWYG GPLized HTML editor Again: I don't think that this is the right Group for such a tool. bluefish is an editor, that's it. It doesn't have that much to do with Networking or the WWW in particular. Just because you may create web pages with it, doesn't mean IMO that it should be put in this group. Or would you put vim, xemacs, kedit also there? You should, as you can create web pages with it... Yep you're right. Probably the "Editor" group. -- Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] §õªø· ~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant. http://devel.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk "7 days of honeymoon makes one whole week."
