RE: [Cooker] Re: illegal binaries?

2002-01-17 Thread Franki

I was wondering why none on the mainstream distro's do this?

they all want to be the fastest out there, so why not release a distro where
on the kernel, rpm, and compiler and all depenencies for them are as
binaries, and everything else is a src.rpm, which with some changes,
MandrakeUpdate (or the install app) could then compile to source and install
that...

I know that the differences between i586 and i686 is fairly small
performance wise right now, but every little bit helps right? and for
Athlons, which are gaining pretty fast in popularity, the differences would
be more pronounced wouldn't they?

and the difference in performance would be increased as compilers got better
at optimised code...

so why isn't anyone significant doing it?  is it technically unfeasable??
would it make an install take 5 hours?

anyone know why its not a popular approach?


rgds

frank

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian J. Murrell
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] Re: illegal binaries?


On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:48:59AM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:

 Hmm, interesting idea...  Maybe I'll try to do something in this
 direction ;)

It's been done.  I had heard that there is/was a Linux distro (was it
Yellowdog?) that would install a build kit and then compile the
entire distro for your hardware as part of the OS install.

This, IMHO would be a perfectly viable way for Linux distros to
distribute things like Mplayer.  Anything that can benefit even
somewhat significantly from being built for the native processor could
use this mechanism.

b.


--
Brian J. Murrell





RE: [Cooker] Re: illegal binaries?

2002-01-17 Thread Sylvain OBEGI

le jeu 17-01-2002 à 10:59, Franki a écrit :
 I was wondering why none on the mainstream distro's do this?
 
 they all want to be the fastest out there, so why not release a distro where
 on the kernel, rpm, and compiler and all depenencies for them are as
 binaries, and everything else is a src.rpm, which with some changes,
 MandrakeUpdate (or the install app) could then compile to source and install
 that...
 
 I know that the differences between i586 and i686 is fairly small
 performance wise right now, but every little bit helps right? and for
 Athlons, which are gaining pretty fast in popularity, the differences would
 be more pronounced wouldn't they?
 
 and the difference in performance would be increased as compilers got better
 at optimised code...
 
 so why isn't anyone significant doing it?  is it technically unfeasable??
 would it make an install take 5 hours?

You mean.. To compile XFree only, right?
 
 anyone know why its not a popular approach?

Maybe because it's really slow? It will probably take a night to compile
KDE on most systems.. I don't know if everyone would support installing
a whole distro (how much packages?) in not less than a week.

Anyway, there is Gentoo..

Just my 0.02¤ :)

-- 

Sylvain OBEGI 
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ : 661913 






Re: [Cooker] Re: illegal binaries?

2002-01-17 Thread Chuck Shirley

On Thursday 17 January 2002 05:21, Sylvain OBEGI wrote:
le jeu 17-01-2002 à 10:59, Franki a écrit :
 I was wondering why none on the mainstream distro's do this?
[...]
 so why isn't anyone significant doing it?  is it technically unfeasable??
 would it make an install take 5 hours?

You mean.. To compile XFree only, right?
 
 anyone know why its not a popular approach?

Maybe because it's really slow? It will probably take a night to compile
KDE on most systems.. I don't know if everyone would support installing
a whole distro (how much packages?) in not less than a week.

Anyway, there is Gentoo..

Just my 0.02¤ :)


So what is to keep a person from doing this with Mandrake?  I am
not a master of RPM, but I wonder, how difficult is it to tell 
RPM to turn on architecture dependant optimizations, and build 
your packages from the SRPMS?  That way, you could do it 
incrementally, and only with packages that could really benefit 
from the optimizations (XFree, KDE, Kernel, Xine, etc...)  

-- 
*Chuck*




RE: [Cooker] Re: illegal binaries?

2002-01-17 Thread andre

Op do 17-01-2002, om 11:21 schreef Sylvain OBEGI:
 le jeu 17-01-2002 à 10:59, Franki a écrit :
  I was wondering why none on the mainstream distro's do this?
  
  they all want to be the fastest out there, so why not release a distro where
  on the kernel, rpm, and compiler and all depenencies for them are as
  binaries, and everything else is a src.rpm, which with some changes,
  MandrakeUpdate (or the install app) could then compile to source and install
  that...
  
  I know that the differences between i586 and i686 is fairly small
  performance wise right now, but every little bit helps right? and for
  Athlons, which are gaining pretty fast in popularity, the differences would
  be more pronounced wouldn't they?
  
  and the difference in performance would be increased as compilers got better
  at optimised code...
  
  so why isn't anyone significant doing it?  is it technically unfeasable??
  would it make an install take 5 hours?
 
 You mean.. To compile XFree only, right?

X doesn't take 5 hours. especially if you only build your driver. But
still to build a normal install would take significant longer that 5
hours

  
  anyone know why its not a popular approach?
 
 Maybe because it's really slow? It will probably take a night to compile
 KDE on most systems.. I don't know if everyone would support installing
 a whole distro (how much packages?) in not less than a week.
 
 Anyway, there is Gentoo..
 
 Just my 0.02¤ :)
 
 -- 
 
 Sylvain OBEGI 
 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ICQ : 661913 
 
 





Re: [Cooker] Re: illegal binaries?

2002-01-16 Thread Sylvain OBEGI

le jeu 17-01-2002 à 01:27, Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
 On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:48:59AM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
  
  Hmm, interesting idea...  Maybe I'll try to do something in this
  direction ;)
 
 It's been done.  I had heard that there is/was a Linux distro (was it
 Yellowdog?) that would install a build kit and then compile the
 entire distro for your hardware as part of the OS install.
 
 This, IMHO would be a perfectly viable way for Linux distros to
 distribute things like Mplayer.  Anything that can benefit even
 somewhat significantly from being built for the native processor could
 use this mechanism.

Gentoo Linux works like this. You compile the whole distribution with
your compiler options. (www.gentoo.org). Slow, but optimized

-- 

Sylvain OBEGI 
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ : 661913