Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker

2001-02-25 Thread Ruairi Hickey

On Tuesday 20 February 2001 20:26, Ruairi Hickey wrote:
 Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
 reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?)..  Does the
 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ?  (

 Ruairi
I did another install today (Sunday 25th) with an updated cooker and had the 
same results..  I have yet to get cooker to boot off of reiserfs... ext2 
works just fine  I can boot into my 7.2 and mount the partitions without 
a problem
Where do I start to try figure out what's causing this...
Hardware is a Dell WorkStation 410, UW AIC7890 scsi on module AIC7xxx with 2 
hard drives... The cooker drive has a 2gb windows partition followed be 3gb 
reiserfs /  and 3gb reiserfs /home and swap.

Ruairi




Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker

2001-02-25 Thread Jose

Ruairi Hickey wrote:

 Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
 reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?)..  Does the
 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ?  (

 Ruairi

 
 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1

Have you checked for the initrd image, mandrake doesn't compile reiserfs
support as part of the kernel, rather was a module.  I have noticed that
some mandrake cooker kernel rpms make the initrd image and modify lilo/
grub automagically, others don't.





Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker

2001-02-20 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Ruairi Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
 reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?)..  Does the
 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ?  (

yes it does, i have just installed in cooker with full reiserfs
without any problem..

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
  --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker

2001-02-20 Thread Neal Pitts

I don't think so.  Looks like the kernel module isn't loaded until a 
filesystem in /etc/fstab is accessed.  I also tried to make my root 
partition with reiser and got the same results.

Ruairi Hickey wrote:

 Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
 reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?)..  Does the
 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ?  (
 
 Ruairi
 
 
 
 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
 
 
 


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker

2001-02-20 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 -Either it was fixed over the weekend and the installer fix hadn't
 percolated out to us,

that should be the reason.

 -You didn't install the standard 2.4.x kernel, you installed the 2.2.x
 kernel or perhaps even the 2.4.1-linus version of the kernel (though I
 doubt that).

you take me for a newbie ?

 -There is some bug that we tripped over and you didn't.  I believe I
 did a very vanilla install that time, because I was already suspicious
 that reiserfs wouldn't boot with 2.4.1, having tried copying my root
 fs to a reiserfs fs and booting late 2.3.x kernels, and failed at it
 for reasons I've yet to understand.

i'll check with new install, got to fix a nfs+reiserfs problem before...

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
  --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] Reiserfs and Cooker

2001-02-20 Thread James Mitchell

Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:

 Ruairi Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 
 Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
 reiserfs after boot I get a no root device on 80:5 (0805 ?)..  Does the
 2.4.1-16 kernel support reiserfs root partitions ?  (
 
 
 yes it does, i have just installed in cooker with full reiserfs
 without any problem..

I saw the same problem as Ruairi this weekend, up to date as of st least 
Saturday night.  So there are three possible explanations I see for it 
working for you...

-Either it was fixed over the weekend and the installer fix hadn't 
percolated out to us,
-You didn't install the standard 2.4.x kernel, you installed the 2.2.x 
kernel or perhaps even the 2.4.1-linus version of the kernel (though I 
doubt that).
-There is some bug that we tripped over and you didn't.  I believe I did a 
very vanilla install that time, because I was already suspicious that 
reiserfs wouldn't boot with 2.4.1, having tried copying my root fs to a 
reiserfs fs and booting late 2.3.x kernels, and failed at it for reasons 
I've yet to understand.

James Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
People seek to feel better immediately and, to accomplish that, they yield
to temptations even when doing so may be contrary to their long-term best
interests and...goals.
 -Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001;80:53-67


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com