Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
On Tue 11 Mar 2003 19:42, James Sparenberg posted as excerpted below: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 17:58, Jason Greenwood wrote: Impressive, you must have a big HDD!! =) The secret is to filter out all html e-mails... acii gets real small. Unfortunately, according to my not yet emptied trash folder, one Jason Greenwood is apparently the most prolific HTML poster on the list since the my last update. Some of his seem to be HTML, some not. I too filter HTML to the trash. It's a great way to kill most of the spam. I do scan the subject lines b4 closing KMail, tho, and auto-deleting them, just to be sure I'm not going to be deleting anything important. -- Duncan They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2003, 08:26:08 Uhr MET, schrieb Brook Humphrey: I just looked at my mailbox for this list and there has been approximately 45000 emails to this list in the last year. I had no idea kmail was holding 45000 email for just this one list. Looks like I need to do some cleaning. Wow, I'm sure you don't use mbox. My Cooker folder becomes unusable at 1000 messages and I have to delete stuff. The home dir is mounted from a heavily loaded Sun server, maybe they should put Mandrake on that one :-) -- Götz Waschk master of computer science University of Rostock http://wwwtec.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key -- Logout Fascism! --
Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 16:26, Brook Humphrey wrote: I just looked at my mailbox for this list and there has been approximately 45000 emails to this list in the last year. I had no idea kmail was holding 45000 email for just this one list. Looks like I need to do some cleaning. For Cooker and CHRPM combined there've been 20,000 just since the middle of January... -- adamw
Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
Wow, I'm sure you don't use mbox. My Cooker folder becomes unusable at 1000 messages and I have to delete stuff. Mine work fine on a 13000 messages mbox. For Cooker and with Kmail But I had some problem when sorting message, since I am always low on disk space ( documents are like gaz, they always take all the avaliable space ) -- Mickaël Scherer
Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:48, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 16:26, Brook Humphrey wrote: I just looked at my mailbox for this list and there has been approximately 45000 emails to this list in the last year. I had no idea kmail was holding 45000 email for just this one list. Looks like I need to do some cleaning. For Cooker and CHRPM combined there've been 20,000 just since the middle of January... 28413 for cooker alone and a total e-mail count of just over 80,000 e-mails in Evolution and still going strong. James
Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 03:24 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:48, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 16:26, Brook Humphrey wrote: I just looked at my mailbox for this list and there has been approximately 45000 emails to this list in the last year. I had no idea kmail was holding 45000 email for just this one list. Looks like I need to do some cleaning. For Cooker and CHRPM combined there've been 20,000 just since the middle of January... 28413 for cooker alone and a total e-mail count of just over 80,000 e-mails in Evolution and still going strong. James Ok you got me curious so I counted up most my emails it could be off by maybe as much as 200 or 300 but I doubt it is that far off. Anyway I have somewere around 233,000 emails and yes you read that correctly. For me they are obviously in kmail. I think Jean Michael can beat this however. -- -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~- Brook Humphrey Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107 http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Holiness unto the Lord -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
James Sparenberg wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:48, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 16:26, Brook Humphrey wrote: I just looked at my mailbox for this list and there has been approximately 45000 emails to this list in the last year. I had no idea kmail was holding 45000 email for just this one list. Looks like I need to do some cleaning. For Cooker and CHRPM combined there've been 20,000 just since the middle of January... 28413 for cooker alone and a total e-mail count of just over 80,000 e-mails in Evolution and still going strong. James
Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
Impressive, you must have a big HDD!! =) eddie wrote: James Sparenberg wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:48, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 16:26, Brook Humphrey wrote: I just looked at my mailbox for this list and there has been approximately 45000 emails to this list in the last year. I had no idea kmail was holding 45000 email for just this one list. Looks like I need to do some cleaning. For Cooker and CHRPM combined there've been 20,000 just since the middle of January... 28413 for cooker alone and a total e-mail count of just over 80,000 e-mails in Evolution and still going strong. James
Re: [Cooker] WOW OT post count
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 17:58, Jason Greenwood wrote: Impressive, you must have a big HDD!! =) eddie wrote: James Sparenberg wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:48, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 16:26, Brook Humphrey wrote: I just looked at my mailbox for this list and there has been approximately 45000 emails to this list in the last year. I had no idea kmail was holding 45000 email for just this one list. Looks like I need to do some cleaning. For Cooker and CHRPM combined there've been 20,000 just since the middle of January... 28413 for cooker alone and a total e-mail count of just over 80,000 e-mails in Evolution and still going strong. James The secret is to filter out all html e-mails... acii gets real small.
Re: [Cooker] Wow - picture too!
Stumbled across it actually - if memory serves me correctly, a simple Alt-F3 (or F4) does the trick - or was that Ctrl-F4? I was messing around with the Ctrl-Alt-F1 to F5 keys during install and found it somehow. It may be nice if someone out there could tell us the exact key combo . . . Maybe after I try my next install (today maybe) I can give you a more direct answer. There may be other hidden goodies in the install routine . . and it's possible that Mandrake likes to keep them undocumented because they don't want this mail-list to be flooded with screenshot attachments . . . Just a hunch. Good luck! R.Fox On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 23:28, Colin Murphy wrote: On Saturday 19 January 2002 1:37 pm, Robert Fox wrote: Here is a snapshot of the error just before the X config section. Hi, caught your message. How did you get the screen shot of the install screen? Thanks. -- Colin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] A man for all seasons, 'specially pepper.
Re: [Cooker] Wow - picture too!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Fox) writes: Stumbled across it actually - if memory serves me correctly, a simple Alt-F3 (or F4) does the trick - or was that Ctrl-F4? I was messing around with the Ctrl-Alt-F1 to F5 keys during install and found it somehow. It may be nice if someone out there could tell us the exact key combo the best way for reporting errors is to send the /root/report.bug (when you managed to finish the install), or the /tmp/ddebug.log during the install (the bug command can help (type it on console 2)) as for your Net::FTP: Timeout error, it's a known bug that is fixed in next DrakX upload (#1.625)
Re: [Cooker] Wow!
Mattias Dahlberg wrote: This appears in i810 chipsets driven in accelerated graphics mode under KDE. Is it the same with i815? We're thinking about replacing our computers. Still, the font issue needs to be taken care of. There should not be any bitmap fonts in Linux-Mandrake and the fonts used should be picked carefully. I urge everyone at MandrakeSoft to make a clean install of cooker and surf around with Konqueror and edit files with KWrite, etc., and change the fonts that look bad. Mattias yes, PLEASE - the editor default font in KDE is unreadable, and some of the fonts used in web browsing don't scale - increase the size 3 or 4 times, every time is bigger, but difficult to read because not scaled well. Vinny
Re: [Cooker] Wow!
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Vincent Meyer wrote: Mattias Dahlberg wrote: This appears in i810 chipsets driven in accelerated graphics mode under KDE. Is it the same with i815? We're thinking about replacing our computers. Still, the font issue needs to be taken care of. There should not be any bitmap fonts in Linux-Mandrake and the fonts used should be picked carefully. I urge everyone at MandrakeSoft to make a clean install of cooker and surf around with Konqueror and edit files with KWrite, etc., and change the fonts that look bad. Mattias yes, PLEASE - the editor default font in KDE is unreadable, and some of the fonts used in web browsing don't scale - increase the size 3 or 4 times, every time is bigger, but difficult to read because not scaled well. I second that. This mostly applies to fixed-width fonts ... just try to access FTP over a HTTP proxy and resulted text is hardly readable on 1024x768 even with Windows TTF fonts available. -andrej
Re: [Cooker] Wow!
This appears in i810 chipsets driven in accelerated graphics mode under KDE. Is it the same with i815? We're thinking about replacing our computers. Still, the font issue needs to be taken care of. There should not be any bitmap fonts in Linux-Mandrake and the fonts used should be picked carefully. I urge everyone at MandrakeSoft to make a clean install of cooker and surf around with Konqueror and edit files with KWrite, etc., and change the fonts that look bad. Mattias
Re: [Cooker] Wow!
This appears in i810 chipsets driven in accelerated graphics mode under KDE. Is it the same with i815? We're thinking about replacing our computers. Still, the font issue needs to be taken care of. There should not be any bitmap fonts in Linux-Mandrake and the fonts used should be picked carefully. I urge everyone at MandrakeSoft to make a clean install of cooker and surf around with Konqueror and edit files with KWrite, etc., and change to fonts that look better. Mattias
Re: [Cooker] Wow!
On Tuesday 06 March 2001 15:10, you wrote: Wow! The new LILO is beautiful. Congrats! Now when I got your attention. I made a fresh install of today's cooker and there are a couple of problems in KDE. o The fonts. Some of the fonts are simply unreadable. Are they bitmap fonts? I made a screenshot of Konqueror and KWrite. See below. o Graphics glitches. I have the i810 chipset and XFree86 4.0.2 was installed. Take a look at the screenshot again, see the vertical lines in borders and scrollbars? Screenshot: http://www.du.se/~mda/kdeprobs.png Mattias This appears in i810 chipsets driven in accelerated graphics mode under KDE. Perhaps it is a feature of the images to let you know you have true acceleration. Option "noaccel" eliminates it and the muddy appearance of Konsole windows when you move other window borders across their screens. I repeat, this is a feature that appears only when THREE conditions coincide. i810 chipset KDE full acceleration under X remove any one and you do not see the feature. Civileme BTW this feature is also present in rudimentary form (muddy Konsole) in KDE 2.0 and 2.0.1. It works better in the betas and seems to have reached its peak performance in KDE 2.1. It also works well under both 8.0 and cooker installs and 7.2 installs.
RE: [Cooker] Wow is it dec. already? ;-)
Eugenio Diaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandra ke/RPMS]# rpm -qp --changelog glade-0.5.5-5mdk.i586.rpm|more * Tue Dec 14 1999 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] humm i don't understand, what the problem excatly ? The fact that "December 14 1999" is one month in the future ! :-) Where did you get a time machine ? I want one !! :-) -- David Faure [EMAIL PROTECTED] - KDE developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mandrake [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Cramer Systems
Re: [Cooker] Wow is it dec. already? ;-)
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Eugenio Diaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# rpm -qp --changelog glade-0.5.5-5mdk.i586.rpm|more * Tue Dec 14 1999 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] humm i don't understand, what the problem excatly ? looking for some gifts sooner ? "14 Dec" lenny -- -- Lenny Cartier / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Wow is it dec. already? ;-)
David Faure wrote: Eugenio Diaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandra ke/RPMS]# rpm -qp --changelog glade-0.5.5-5mdk.i586.rpm|more * Tue Dec 14 1999 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] humm i don't understand, what the problem excatly ? The fact that "December 14 1999" is one month in the future ! :-) Then bring back Mandrake 6.2, so we have it already done... :-) Where did you get a time machine ? I want one !! :-) Bye. Giuseppe.
