Re: [Cooker] wu-ftpd 2.6.0...
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Sergio Korlowsky wrote: > So then I assume kBeroFTPD will continue to be available and is supposed to work > with wu-ftpd-2.60 as well? Sure - it'll be renamed to kwu-ftpd or something soon, and it's part of KDE 2.0. LLaP bero -- Tired of waiting for Windows 2000? STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/
Re: [Cooker] wu-ftpd 2.6.0...
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Michael Irving wrote: > > > On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, you wrote: > > > I've just put wu-ftpd 2.6.0 [pre2] in Cooker. > > > Please test this package thoroughly and let me know of any problems... > > > Unless any major bugs turn up, we'll release it by Friday... [Speaking for > > > the wu-ftpd development group here, not for Mandrake] > > > > Have you totally stopped developing bero ftpd? > > BeroFTPD and wu-ftpd have been merged together again. > The only reason I started BeroFTPD was that wu-ftpd seemed to be pretty > much stalled - a new release only every few months, not integrating any of > the fixes or new features people like myself posted on the lists. > > After 2.4.2beta17, things started to be different, there was wu-ftpd > stock, which was stalled, there was wu-ftpd-vr, Gregory Lundberg's version > of what the daemon should be, and BeroFTPD, my version of what it should > be. > > Since more and more people got annoyed with this, the old maintainer was > finally ruled out and starting with 2.5.0, wu-ftpd was transfered to an > open development group led by Gregory and myself. > > The 2.6.0 version is all about getting the BeroFTPD features and fixes > back into wu-ftpd, and I have CVS write access to the tree, so I don't see > a need to work on BeroFTPD anymore because basically wu-ftpd 2.6.0 = > BeroFTPD 1.4.0. > > I'll probably release a wu-ftpd 2.6.0 version I just repackaged as > BeroFTPD 1.4.0 just so people see where we're headed. ;) > > LLaP > bero > > -- > Tired of waiting for Windows 2000? > STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/ So then I assume kBeroFTPD will continue to be available and is supposed to work with wu-ftpd-2.60 as well? SK
Re: [Cooker] wu-ftpd 2.6.0...
Is kberoFtp will still working.. or a new version should be out like kwuftd? Emmanuel Paré GIS/Programming for DBX Geomatics email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux-mandrake.com -Original Message- From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 18 septembre, 1999 09:27 Subject: Re: [Cooker] wu-ftpd 2.6.0... >On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Michael Irving wrote: > >> On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, you wrote: >> > I've just put wu-ftpd 2.6.0 [pre2] in Cooker. >> > Please test this package thoroughly and let me know of any problems... >> > Unless any major bugs turn up, we'll release it by Friday... [Speaking for >> > the wu-ftpd development group here, not for Mandrake] >> >> Have you totally stopped developing bero ftpd? > >BeroFTPD and wu-ftpd have been merged together again. >The only reason I started BeroFTPD was that wu-ftpd seemed to be pretty >much stalled - a new release only every few months, not integrating any of >the fixes or new features people like myself posted on the lists. > >After 2.4.2beta17, things started to be different, there was wu-ftpd >stock, which was stalled, there was wu-ftpd-vr, Gregory Lundberg's version >of what the daemon should be, and BeroFTPD, my version of what it should >be. > >Since more and more people got annoyed with this, the old maintainer was >finally ruled out and starting with 2.5.0, wu-ftpd was transfered to an >open development group led by Gregory and myself. > >The 2.6.0 version is all about getting the BeroFTPD features and fixes >back into wu-ftpd, and I have CVS write access to the tree, so I don't see >a need to work on BeroFTPD anymore because basically wu-ftpd 2.6.0 = >BeroFTPD 1.4.0. > >I'll probably release a wu-ftpd 2.6.0 version I just repackaged as >BeroFTPD 1.4.0 just so people see where we're headed. ;) > >LLaP >bero > >-- >Tired of waiting for Windows 2000? > STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/ > > >
Re: [Cooker] wu-ftpd 2.6.0...
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Michael Irving wrote: > On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, you wrote: > > I've just put wu-ftpd 2.6.0 [pre2] in Cooker. > > Please test this package thoroughly and let me know of any problems... > > Unless any major bugs turn up, we'll release it by Friday... [Speaking for > > the wu-ftpd development group here, not for Mandrake] > > Have you totally stopped developing bero ftpd? BeroFTPD and wu-ftpd have been merged together again. The only reason I started BeroFTPD was that wu-ftpd seemed to be pretty much stalled - a new release only every few months, not integrating any of the fixes or new features people like myself posted on the lists. After 2.4.2beta17, things started to be different, there was wu-ftpd stock, which was stalled, there was wu-ftpd-vr, Gregory Lundberg's version of what the daemon should be, and BeroFTPD, my version of what it should be. Since more and more people got annoyed with this, the old maintainer was finally ruled out and starting with 2.5.0, wu-ftpd was transfered to an open development group led by Gregory and myself. The 2.6.0 version is all about getting the BeroFTPD features and fixes back into wu-ftpd, and I have CVS write access to the tree, so I don't see a need to work on BeroFTPD anymore because basically wu-ftpd 2.6.0 = BeroFTPD 1.4.0. I'll probably release a wu-ftpd 2.6.0 version I just repackaged as BeroFTPD 1.4.0 just so people see where we're headed. ;) LLaP bero -- Tired of waiting for Windows 2000? STOP WAITING! http://www.ms-windows-2000.com/
Re: [Cooker] wu-ftpd 2.6.0...
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, you wrote: > I've just put wu-ftpd 2.6.0 [pre2] in Cooker. > Please test this package thoroughly and let me know of any problems... > Unless any major bugs turn up, we'll release it by Friday... [Speaking for > the wu-ftpd development group here, not for Mandrake] > Have you totally stopped developing bero ftpd? Michael Irving
