RE: [Cooker-firewall] MNF is out
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] Radvánszki Gábor wrote: + Just to let you know, a Symantec firewall appliance family has the + same bug, if it is a bug - it does not work with IE6 SP1. All + developers said earlier that only mozilla is OK Well, this may be a good news after all considering all these IE-only sites that exist today. Let them learn to stick to standards... :-b cu Denis -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- Our housekeeper doesn't do Windows and neither do WE! (L.P. Santuro)
Re: [Cooker-firewall] shorewall
On 26 Sep 2002, Florin wrote: + MNF only uses a web interface to configure shorewall ... it does not have + all the features that shorewall has ... due to some frontend/php + limitations. You cannot use space-separated lists, for example. But you Why couldn't one use space separated lists with web interface? -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- Our housekeeper doesn't do Windows and neither do WE! (L.P. Santuro)
RE: [Cooker-firewall] SNF in lm 9.0
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Marcel van Groenigen wrote: + Could we have a voting option for this in the mandrake club ? Hm. What do you have in mind? ISO image only for club members? -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- Our housekeeper doesn't do Windows and neither do WE! (L.P. Santuro)
Re: [Cooker-firewall] SNF in lm 9.0
On 20 Sep 2002, Florin wrote: + No the idea was that I would like some option to direct some of the + money payed for the membership to this project. + + (But no complaints from here if you make it available for members) + + my swiss bank account n° is ... ;o) (only a silly joke) + Ah, that's how you plan to start your own company! ,-) -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- Our housekeeper doesn't do Windows and neither do WE! (L.P. Santuro)
Re: [Cooker-firewall] SNF in lm 9.0
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Philippe Libat wrote: + I can give you my private account number located in Bahamas ;) Hey, come-on: i have an account in Austria, and I'm sure it woul be happy to get money! ;-) + + More Seriously, check mandrakeexpert site. + http://www.mandrakeexpert.com + + you can paid for direct answer. + + or you can take support incident. OK, let's be serious: I think he's talking about something different: I could in principle let Club members pose their wishlist, either the way we did with languages, or the way we do with RPM-voting system. Thus, one could easily see what our paying customers want us to do, and spend more time actually doing it. Simple money talks principle on its best. That's especially good for such projects as Firewall, and even more so with PPC port, as these projects don't get as much attention as the main distro gets. However, one could use the same principle for anything you can think of and more... cu Denis -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- Our housekeeper doesn't do Windows and neither do WE! (L.P. Santuro)
RE: [Cooker-firewall] SNF in lm 9.0
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Marcel van Groenigen wrote: + Wat projects should be sponsered the most by ClubMandrake MandrakeClub. .-) + + [ ] Cooker + [ ] RPM apps + [ ] HardDrake + [ ] DrakX + [ ] DiskDrake + [ ] I18n + [ ] CVS + [ ] Prelude + [ ] Bastille Linux + [ ] MNF + Yes, that's what I thought. But, I'm friend of open voting systems, where users provide their own ideas, instead of being limited to ours. That's how RPM voting works... Problem is: that's unusual concept, so we had to write our own custom software for RPM voting. cu Denis -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- Our housekeeper doesn't do Windows and neither do WE! (L.P. Santuro)
Re: [Cooker-firewall] snf 8.1
Folks, Does anyone know who is the guy who posted the story about 50+ SNF servers all over Australia? I would like to have his story in MandrakeBizcases.com! cu Denis -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- Our housekeeper doesn't do Windows and neither do WE! (L.P. Santuro)
Re: [Cooker-firewall] Ports Forward and Proxy Problems
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Paul Smith wrote: + Old version of SNF? Is there a new one I have somehow missed? Florin is working on a new version.
Re: [Cooker-firewall] SNF 7.2 - next release?
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Andre Krajnik wrote: + I assume SNF2 will be based on either 8.0 or 8.1? + + That's the main reason for me to ask for the next releae. I do not want + to install all by myself and than see that a new release is ready. First + I will migrate to the next release (hopfully base on Mandrake 8.x, + Kernel 2.4.x), than apply the additional services. + + But dial-on-demand / line-cutting after a defined time of inactivity and + configuring the billing-period for time and volume is essential for me! I doubt SNF2 will be finished before end of this year. Then again, Florin is really eager to do it, and there will certainly be an developers version out before that... cu Denis -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo-
[Cooker-firewall] [newbie-de] Mandrake Security SNF für LAN (fwd)
Short translation: could SNF be used to connect two LAN-s, and how? -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:24:34 +0200 From: Andre Zimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mandrake-newbie-de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie-de] Mandrake Security SNF für LAN Hallo Linuxer, In der Administrationssite der Mandrake-Security Distri gibt es unter Internet Access die Punkte - Analog Modem - ISDN Modem - DSL Connection - Cable LAN - Provider Accounts Frage: Kann ich die Mandrake Security SNF auch so einrichten, dass sie zwischen zwei LAN-Netzen arbeitet, und wenn ja wie?? Danke -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen Andre Zimmer --- Staatliches Umweltamt Lippstadt Dezernat 12 (EDV) Lipperoderstr. 8 59555 Lippstadt mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: +492941986-324
[Cooker-firewall] [Mandrake Forum 1068] Re: Mandrake Single Network Firewall Reviewed(fwd)
Thought this might interest you cu Denis -- Forwarded message -- Date: 11 Jul 2001 20:37:14 - From: Mandrake Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mandrake Forum 1068] Re: Mandrake Single Network Firewall Reviewed http://mandrakeforum.com/article.php?sid=1068lang=en New comment for Mandrake Single Network Firewall Reviewed story Re: Mandrake Single Network Firewall Reviewed ,by I also found the installation easy. Using eth0 for the LAN was not a problem and is well documented in the installation guide.br br Problems I did find though.br br When using squid and squidGuard, the /var/log/squid/cache.log was getting filled with an error that squidGuard was unable to write to /var/log/squidGuard/squidGuard.log or advertisment.log. I changed the default config files to point squidGuard logs to /var/log/squid directory and all worked well.br br The other problem I incountered was restoring a saved config. It would restore the saved config but in the process would totally clobber the eth1 NIC. The only way I found to get the NIC to be recognized again was a system reboot.br br Overall I found the installation and config very easy. Documentation could be better. I would also like to see documentation on the location of all the config files (both the template and running files) and instructions on making entries direct. The web interface is nice, but when you have lots of entries to make, it tends to be time consuming.br br I would give this product a rating of 7. But that is just my humble opinion.br br M. Hasse
Re: R: [Cooker-firewall] cooker-firewall
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Miguel Beccari wrote: :~ Hello Everyone: :~ :~ What is the latest version of this distro? :~ :~ I seem to have a hard time finding information about this distro. Any :~ suggestions for web site, etc? :~ :~ :~I cant find infos about cooke-firewall. :~ :~I planned to setup up 3 servers and I'd like to use this distro. :~So my question is: :~ :~when the stable release comes out? :~ :~one month? two? :~ Miguel (and others), Distro will be out very soon (less than one month), and I'm curious to hear answer to one question from you and other raders of this list: money. That is, what would you (or your customers) like to get from us (related to MandrakeSecurity), and how much are you willing to pay for it? I'm asking this question because of one really unpleasant detail: if everyone simply downloads the distribution, and we don't earn on it, I bet the distribution will eventually end up in trash can, and you will end up with unsupported (== no more security updates! == useless) distribution on your firewall. ;-) So: how much is your security worth to you, and what do you expect to have from Mandrakesoft in return? In my opinion, best thing to do would be some kind of long-term commitment from both sides, like: Customer: monthly fee of X$/server during next Y months (years). Mandrakesoft: commitment to do (whatever) during the same period. WDYT? Denis -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- The mailserver is on strike. It wants better working conditions, paid days off and a female connector. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[Cooker-firewall] Interesting Article at Mandrake Forum (fwd)
Folks, Thought this might interest you... cu denis -- Mdk 8.0 or Mdk Security for 486-based firewall/data server? (Date: 2001-05-10 00:00:00) Topic: Security PMy wife and I are hoping to get a cable net connection soon and I'd like to cobble together some computer bits and set up a 486 as a firewall and general data server (CVS, email, web, FTP, all using virtual servers). I'm trying to decide between waiting for a 486 compile of Mdk 8.0 or the forthcoming Mdk Security distro./P PGiven that it'll be a 486 PC, Mdk 8.0 is out until a version is released that will run on it, so that pretty-much leaves running Mdk Security and installing/configuring the extra services by hand. How easy would it be to kick MdkSecurity into a generally-usable server?/P PKeep up the excellent work guys!/P PI strongAnswer:/strongAlthough primarly developed as a firewall/rooter, MandrakeSecurity offers a possibility to configure firewall rules which allow running different servers on firewall machine. Configuration of these servers isn't integrated in MandrakeSecurity web configuration interface, but nothing prevents you from running Webmin, or using any other configuration tool to do so. /PP Of corse, running different servers on firewall/rooter machine makes this machine more woulnerable, but IMO MandrakeSecurity still remains more secure than standard LM distribution (hey, that's what it's made for!) /I/P You can read interesting articles at Mandrake Forum http://mandrakeforum.com
Re: [Cooker-firewall] Scott A Mchenry/CIV/CSC is out of the office.
Lieber Alexander, Wen das Leben nur so einfach wre... On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote: :~Why don't you setup a filter for "out of the office"? Scott is using Lotus :~Notes and it is rather hard to tell this out of office agent to not send :~responses to Mailinglists like this one. :~ :~Filtering "/.*out of the office$/" would take out the largest number of auto :~responses, as this is the default subject ending this agent has. :~ The problem is: people have different notices. I'm already filtering several different forms of BDAR (brain-dead autoreply) notes, but people always come with new forms. If these stupid BDARs would only set priority to "junk", life would be easy but... :~ http://mandrakeforum.com/article.php?sid=123lang=en :~ :~This link is useless since Scott is using Notes on a Windows platform. :~Using Notes means that you can't do anything decently like setting up a :~procmail autoresponder - and yes, it's also close to impossible to setup the :~Notes agent to behave as well as the procmail recipe would be. I see. Well, i feel sorry for him, but I have to think about mental sanity of other readers. He'll have to resubscribe when he's back. Btw, "close to impossible" sounds like "it can be done" to me. Maybe You should write a little HOWTO for L.notes users? cu Denis -- ----- Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- The mailserver is on strike. It wants better working conditions, paid days off and a female connector. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [Cooker-firewall] Scott A Mchenry/CIV/CSC is out of the office.
:~I will be out of the office starting 04/12/2001 and will not return until :~04/23/2001. And you will not receive any more emails from this list... Btw, when will You folks stop using braindead auroresponders which keep replying to mailing lists??? Just in case someone else needs an inteligent autoresponder, here is the description: http://mandrakeforum.com/article.php?sid=123lang=en have fun. Denis -- - Dr. Denis Havlik http://MandrakeForum.com Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Community (@ @)(private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) --oOO--(_)--OOo- The mailserver is on strike. It wants better working conditions, paid days off and a female connector. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
