Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ...
Hi David, could you also adjust the script so that the special kind of about.html like about_bundle_id.html is detected? Please see: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=401273 Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtend.lib.source_2.4.2.v201306040922.jar Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtend.lib_2.4.2.v201306040922.jar Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.lib.source_2.4.2.v201306040922.jar Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.lib_2.4.2.v201306040922.jar Best regards, Dennis Hübner. Am 05.06.2013 um 21:44 schrieb David M Williams: David, can you please plan to re-run the script on Friday? Yes, it is ran each time staging is updated ... and while staging will be closed tonight and Thursday (to get RC3 EPP done) on Friday I will turn the job back on, and promote new builds to staging whenever there is something new to promote. (I will be out Friday afternoon, but will check in morning, and again in evening). Thanks, ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev Dennis Hübner Xtext Commiter / Build Engineer Mobile: +49 (0) 151 / 17 39 67 07 Telefon: +49 (0) 431 / 990 268 70 Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 990 268 72 itemis AG Niederlassung Kiel Am Germaniahafen 1 24143 Kiel http://www.itemis.de/ Rechtlicher Hinweis: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 20621 Vorstand: Jens Wagener (Vors.), Wolfgang Neuhaus, Dr. Georg Pietrek, Jens Trompeter, Sebastian Neus Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Burkhard Igel (Vors.), Stephan Grollmann, Michael Neuhaus ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ...
Well ... I might some day ... but there is no reason it has to be me. I suggest opening a cross-project bug requesting the change, and perhaps someone ... such as those that requested the change, or those that approved the change ... would be willing to provide a patch, which I'd be happy to consider. Git locations of the code and running from the workbench are all spelled out in http://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Simultaneous_Release_Reports_FAQ From: Dennis Hübner dennis.hueb...@itemis.de To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org, Date: 06/06/2013 03:13 AM Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ... Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Hi David, could you also adjust the script so that the special kind of about.html like about_bundle_id.html is detected? Please see: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=401273 Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtend.lib.source_2.4.2.v201306040922.jar Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtend.lib_2.4.2.v201306040922.jar Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.lib.source_2.4.2.v201306040922.jar Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.lib_2.4.2.v201306040922.jar Best regards, Dennis Hübner. Am 05.06.2013 um 21:44 schrieb David M Williams: David, can you please plan to re-run the script on Friday? Yes, it is ran each time staging is updated ... and while staging will be closed tonight and Thursday (to get RC3 EPP done) on Friday I will turn the job back on, and promote new builds to staging whenever there is something new to promote. (I will be out Friday afternoon, but will check in morning, and again in evening). Thanks, _ __ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev Dennis Hübner Xtext Commiter / Build Engineer Mobile: +49 (0) 151 / 17 39 67 07 Telefon: +49 (0) 431 / 990 268 70 Fax: +49 (0) 431 / 990 268 72 itemis AG Niederlassung Kiel Am Germaniahafen 1 24143 Kiel http://www.itemis.de/ Rechtlicher Hinweis: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 20621 Vorstand: Jens Wagener (Vors.), Wolfgang Neuhaus, Dr. Georg Pietrek, Jens Trompeter, Sebastian Neus Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Burkhard Igel (Vors.), Stephan Grollmann, Michael Neuhaus _ __ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ...
I've validated the P2 repository of Stardust at /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/milestones/kepler/1.0.0-RC3-SNAPSHOT/plugins which was picked up by the simrel aggregator build but we've no javax.resource_1.5.0.v200906010428.jar included. Should I also check the Require-Bundle section of the MANIFEST.MF files? Von: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] Im Auftrag von Wayne Beaton Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013 21:36 An: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Betreff: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ... I've broken David's missing abouts file into project responsibilities. In some cases, a Kepler project is consuming a non-Kepler project's code. Please connect with the source project's team to address the issue. Note that the full list of files is in the link provided by David http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/layoutCheck.txt Please address this ASAP. David, can you please plan to re-run the script on Friday? EclipseLink or Stardust? Missing about.html in file: javax.resource_1.5.0.v200906010428.jar ECF Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.ecf.* GMF Runtime Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gmf.runtime.* Gyrex Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gyrex.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gemini.jpa_1.1.0.RELEASE.jar Web Tools Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.jpt.doc.user_3.2.0.v201305240436.jar Koneki Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.koneki.* Missing about.html in file: com.cforcoding.jmd_0.8.1.201305031130.jar Mylyn Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews.edit.source_2.0.0.I20130529-1332.jar Riena Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.riena.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.nebula.widgets.grid_1.0.0.HEAD.jar TCF Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.tcf.te.tcf.launch.cdt_1.1.0.201305210728.jar Xtext Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtend.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtext.* m2e-wpt Missing about.html in file: org.sonatype.m2e.mavenarchiver_0.15.0.201207090125-signed-201209140800.jar BIRT Missing about.html in file: uk.co.spudsoft.birt.emitters.excel.source_4.3.0.v201306041519.jar Missing about.html in file: uk.co.spudsoft.birt.emitters.excel_4.3.0.v201306041519.jar Thanks, Wayne On 06/05/2013 02:58 PM, David M Williams wrote: Here we are, nearly at the end of RC3 (remember, staging repo builds close at 5 PM Eastern, unless someone notifies us here they need an extra hour or two). I am a little disappointed there is still so much work for some projects to do to meet minimum requirements to be released, http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/layoutCheck.txt http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/verifydiroutput/unsigned.txt But, I guess every year there are some projects that like to save it to the very end. The main purpose of this note is to educate everyone on some of the mechanics over the next few weeks what we call the Final daze. For those of you that have been through it before ... it's all the same ... just dates have changed ... but it wouldn't hurt for Project Leads and release engineers to re-read. For those of you new to Simultaneous Release, I hope you find it a helpful reference on how to make things go smoother, in a more coordinated way. http://wiki.eclipse.org/Kepler/Final_Daze After reading it, and the documents it links to, please ask here on cross-project list if there are questions, issues, or suggestions. Thanks, ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orgmailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundationhttp://www.eclipse.org Learn about Eclipse Projectshttp://www.eclipse.org/projects [EclipseConFrance 2013]http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2013 ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review
Hi Wayne, If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things: * Review documentation; * PMC approval of review documentation; or * An IP Team-approved IP Log. The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases should already be marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list. If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let me know. We juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss something. for of all, thanks for doing all the juggling. Anyway, I think Code Recommenders should not be on the list. As Bug 408897 [1] states, 1.0.4 is a bugfix release (1.0.0 was approved/reviewed for Juno) and thus does not require a review (and hence PMC approval of the review documentation? Not sure about this one). Also, the IP log has been approved. Best wishes, Andreas [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=408897 -- Codetrails UG (haftungsbeschränkt) The knowledge transfer company Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt Mobile: +49-170-811-3791 http://www.codetrails.com/ Managing Director: Dr. Marcel Bruch Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 91940 ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Missing release information for some Kepler projects
Hi, I've finally managed to updated DLTK contribution to the latest build. When it will be picked up by the release process, to verify the results? Regards, Alex On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Jacek Pospychała jacek.pospych...@gmail.com wrote: hi, PDT has been building and testing against DLTK-nightly builds for last months, so we prefer DLTK 5.0. thanks, Jacek On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alexey Panchenko alex.panche...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Unfortunately The DLTK team were quite busy this year with other projects. Initially the previous (4.0, released 2012) version was added to Kepler, with the intent to replace it later with the 5.0 builds from master. So far, that did not happen yet, partly because of source control (- git) build system (- tycho) changes. AFAIK DLTK is used by PDT and Koneki-Lua Development Tools. So the question to these projects: what DLTK version would you prefer in Kepler? Regards, Alex On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org wrote: I am now only missing the information for the DLTK and Runtime Packaging (RTP) project. I have contacted DLTK via their mailing list; Ian has contacted the RTP project leaders directly (thanks, Ian). I noticed that DLTK is contributing their 4.0 release build (from Juno) to Kepler, despite there being some apparent activity in the project Git repositories. I don't know if there is any specific issue with this, but thought that I'd point it out in case any downstream consumers had any concerns/issues. Thanks, Wayne On 04/26/2013 02:38 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote: I am missing release information for the following projects that have declared intent to participate in Kepler. C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) Runtime Packaging Project (RTP) EclipseLink Ecore Tools Extended Editing Framework (EEF) Jubula Functional Testing Tool MDT XSD (XML Schema Definition) Maven Integration for Web Tools Platform SCA Tools In some cases, it may be that I just can't sort out what release you want to include, or maybe you're planning to include a release that does not occur on the Kepler release date (which I find weird, but is otherwise okay). If you have not done so already, please visit your project's information page and create a release record for Kepler and then please let me know either on this list or via direct email so that I can update the Kepler release page. *I will not accept review documentation for any release that is not recorded in the project metadata.* While you're there, please take a few minutes to update the description and plan information for your release. The description should be a short paragraph that concisely describes the high points of the release. Note that you can still use the old XML-file based plan format if you like using old and painful technology. You can quickly get access to your project's information page directly from the Kepler release page: https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/kepler Let me know if you require any assistance. Wayne -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundationhttp://www.eclipse.org Learn about Eclipse Projects http://www.eclipse.org/projects [image: EclipseCon France 2013] http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2013 ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing listcross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.orghttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundationhttp://www.eclipse.org Learn about Eclipse Projects http://www.eclipse.org/projects [image: EclipseCon France 2013] http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2013 ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 480x60.pngimage/png___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Missing release information for some Kepler projects
I'll turn aggregator back on on Friday ... but ... projects can verify their own stuff, without waiting for the main aggregation build. See http://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Simultaneous_Release_Reports_Running_Locally From: Alexey Panchenko alex.panche...@gmail.com To: Cross project issues cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org, Date: 06/06/2013 08:36 AM Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Missing release information for some Kepler projects Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Hi, I've finally managed to updated DLTK contribution to the latest build. When it will be picked up by the release process, to verify the results? Regards, Alex On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Jacek Pospychała jacek.pospych...@gmail.com wrote: hi, PDT has been building and testing against DLTK-nightly builds for last months, so we prefer DLTK 5.0. thanks, Jacek On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alexey Panchenko alex.panche...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Unfortunately The DLTK team were quite busy this year with other projects. Initially the previous (4.0, released 2012) version was added to Kepler, with the intent to replace it later with the 5.0 builds from master. So far, that did not happen yet, partly because of source control (- git) build system (- tycho) changes. AFAIK DLTK is used by PDT and Koneki-Lua Development Tools. So the question to these projects: what DLTK version would you prefer in Kepler? Regards, Alex On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org wrote: I am now only missing the information for the DLTK and Runtime Packaging (RTP) project. I have contacted DLTK via their mailing list; Ian has contacted the RTP project leaders directly (thanks, Ian). I noticed that DLTK is contributing their 4.0 release build (from Juno) to Kepler, despite there being some apparent activity in the project Git repositories. I don't know if there is any specific issue with this, but thought that I'd point it out in case any downstream consumers had any concerns/issues. Thanks, Wayne On 04/26/2013 02:38 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote: I am missing release information for the following projects that have declared intent to participate in Kepler. C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK) Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) Runtime Packaging Project (RTP) EclipseLink Ecore Tools Extended Editing Framework (EEF) Jubula Functional Testing Tool MDT XSD (XML Schema Definition) Maven Integration for Web Tools Platform SCA Tools In some cases, it may be that I just can't sort out what release you want to include, or maybe you're planning to include a release that does not occur on the Kepler release date (which I find weird, but is otherwise okay). If you have not done so already, please visit your project's information page and create a release record for Kepler and then please let me know either on this list or via direct email so that I can update the Kepler release page. I will not accept review documentation for any release that is not recorded in the project metadata. While you're there, please take a few minutes to update the description and plan information for your release. The description should be a short paragraph that concisely describes the high points of the release. Note that you can still use the old XML-file based plan format if you like using old and painful technology. You can quickly get access to your project's information page directly from the Kepler release page: https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/kepler Let me know if you require any assistance. Wayne -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation Learn about Eclipse Projects _ __ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation Learn about Eclipse Projects _ __ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _ __ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _ __ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _ __ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev image/pngimage/png___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ...
Thanks for looking. I looked a little harder and--based on file dates--it's probably coming from EclipseLink. Wayne On 06/06/2013 04:31 AM, sven.rottst...@sungard.com wrote: Ive validated the P2 repository of Stardust at /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/milestones/kepler/1.0.0-RC3-SNAPSHOT/plugins which was picked up by the simrel aggregator build but weve no javax.resource_1.5.0.v200906010428.jar included. Should I also check the Require-Bundle section of the MANIFEST.MF files? Von: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] Im Auftrag von Wayne Beaton Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013 21:36 An: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Betreff: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ... I've broken David's "missing abouts" file into project responsibilities. In some cases, a Kepler project is consuming a non-Kepler project's code. Please connect with the source project's team to address the issue. Note that the full list of files is in the link provided by David http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/layoutCheck.txt Please address this ASAP. David, can you please plan to re-run the script on Friday? EclipseLink or Stardust? Missing about.html in file: javax.resource_1.5.0.v200906010428.jar ECF Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.ecf.* GMF Runtime Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gmf.runtime.* Gyrex Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gyrex.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gemini.jpa_1.1.0.RELEASE.jar Web Tools Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.jpt.doc.user_3.2.0.v201305240436.jar Koneki Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.koneki.* Missing about.html in file: com.cforcoding.jmd_0.8.1.201305031130.jar Mylyn Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews.edit.source_2.0.0.I20130529-1332.jar Riena Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.riena.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.nebula.widgets.grid_1.0.0.HEAD.jar TCF Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.tcf.te.tcf.launch.cdt_1.1.0.201305210728.jar Xtext Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtend.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtext.* m2e-wpt Missing about.html in file: org.sonatype.m2e.mavenarchiver_0.15.0.201207090125-signed-201209140800.jar BIRT Missing about.html in file: uk.co.spudsoft.birt.emitters.excel.source_4.3.0.v201306041519.jar Missing about.html in file: uk.co.spudsoft.birt.emitters.excel_4.3.0.v201306041519.jar Thanks, Wayne On 06/05/2013 02:58 PM, David M Williams wrote: Here we are, nearly at the end of RC3 (remember, staging repo builds close at 5 PM Eastern, unless someone notifies us here they need an extra hour or two). I am a little disappointed there is still so much work for some projects to do to meet minimum requirements to be "released", http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/layoutCheck.txt http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/verifydiroutput/unsigned.txt But, I guess every year there are some projects that like to "save it to the very end". The main purpose of this note is to educate everyone on some of the mechanics over the next few weeks what we call the "Final daze". For those of you that have been through it before ... it's all the same ... just dates have changed ... but it wouldn't hurt for Project Leads and release engineers to re-read. For those of you new to Simultaneous Release, I hope you find it a helpful reference on how to make things go
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review
Hi Ed. The use of flags in the review bugzillas is something new that I just started doing this year. I'm the one that I expect to be setting the flag. If I'd expected otherwise, I'd have informed the PMCs. What I did ask was this: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg09061.html The deadline to submit your PMC-approved review materials to EMO is June 5/2013. Earlier is fine (better, even). Send me the document, or a link to the document along with a link to the public approval discussion with your PMC. Please do not be late. Let me know if you require assistance. I was trying to keep up with the PMC mailing lists, but some of the discussions where a little more involved that simple +1s, so I fell back on the usual practice of updating the records and scheduling reviews as the information arrived in my inbox. HTH, Wayne On 06/06/2013 12:12 AM, Ed Willink wrote: Hi Wayne I don't think MDT/OCL should be on the list, so I reviewed the Bug 406441 dependencies. It appears that the only projects that satisfy you are ones where you have added the PMC approval yourself. All other projects have a problem at the PMC stage. So it seems that either you or the PMC are failing to complete the approval by updating Bugzillas in response to the approval grant on the PMC mailing list. Regards Ed Willink On 05.06.2013 23:21, Wayne Beaton wrote: Greetings folks. I've built a little Bugzilla query that lists the projects that are missing something that I require for the review. https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?v4=Approved%20IP%20Logbug_status=NEWo5=substringn2=1f1=blockedo3=substringv3=Documentationo1=equalsf4=attachments.descriptionv5=pmc_approvedquery_format=advancedf3=keywordso4=equalsf2=OPf5=flagtypes.namev1=406441list_id=5794737 If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things: * Review documentation; * PMC approval of review documentation; or * An IP Team-approved IP Log. The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases should already be marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list. If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let me know. We juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss something. If you're not on this list, you should be included in the "upcoming reviews" section of the Projects Gateway page: http://eclipse.org/projects/ Let me know if you're missing. If I'm waiting on you to submit your IP Log, or provide me with PMC-approved review documentation, please provide it ASAP. This was due today. The review starts tomorrow; if I don't have your materials in my inbox tomorrow AM, then you miss the review. If you've submitted your review documentation and your IP Log, but the IP Log hasn't come back, I'll schedule you for the review anyway (the review cannot be declared successful until after the IP Log is approved). I do not intend to hold a call for this review. If anybody feels strongly in favour of holding a call, let me know. If you're having trouble meeting any of the requirements, please let me know. My thanks go out to the projects that paid attention and heeded the deadlines. Wayne -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation Learn about Eclipse Projects I ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation Learn about Eclipse Projects ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Kepler projects that are missing something that's required for the review
I've marked the recommenders bug as fixed; it's off the list. Wayne On 06/06/2013 04:40 AM, Andreas Sewe wrote: Hi Wayne, If your project is on this list, you're missing one of three things: * Review documentation; * PMC approval of review documentation; or * An IP Team-approved IP Log. The corresponding records for projects that are doing service releases should already be marked as FIXED and so should not be on this list. If you believe that your project should not be on this list, let me know. We juggle a lot of balls with these releases and it's easy to miss something. for of all, thanks for doing all the juggling. Anyway, I think Code Recommenders should not be on the list. As Bug 408897 [1] states, 1.0.4 is a bugfix release (1.0.0 was approved/reviewed for Juno) and thus does not require a review (and hence PMC approval of the review documentation? Not sure about this one). Also, the IP log has been approved. Best wishes, Andreas [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=408897 -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation Learn about Eclipse Projects ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ...
Wayne, Sorry about the delay. It is coming from EclipseLink. After investigating, it seems the jar used to be just a compile dependency, so didn't contain the needful because it was never shipped. That changed recently, and updating to the Orbit version fell through the cracks. I'm going to make certain we have no issue running against 1.6.0, and slip that version from Orbit into our release p2 repo. If that fails I'm going to have to update our jar with appropriate files, and again regen our release p2 repo. I hope to have this fixed in the next day or so. Eric On 2013-06-06, at 10:58 AM, Wayne Beaton wa...@eclipse.org wrote: Thanks for looking. I looked a little harder and--based on file dates--it's probably coming from EclipseLink. Wayne On 06/06/2013 04:31 AM, sven.rottst...@sungard.com wrote: I’ve validated the P2 repository of Stardust at /home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/milestones/kepler/1.0.0-RC3-SNAPSHOT/plugins which was picked up by the simrel aggregator build but we’ve no javax.resource_1.5.0.v200906010428.jar included. Should I also check the Require-Bundle section of the MANIFEST.MF files? Von: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] Im Auftrag von Wayne Beaton Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013 21:36 An: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org Betreff: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] RC3 and Final Daze ... I've broken David's missing abouts file into project responsibilities. In some cases, a Kepler project is consuming a non-Kepler project's code. Please connect with the source project's team to address the issue. Note that the full list of files is in the link provided by David http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/layoutCheck.txt Please address this ASAP. David, can you please plan to re-run the script on Friday? EclipseLink or Stardust? Missing about.html in file: javax.resource_1.5.0.v200906010428.jar ECF Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.ecf.* GMF Runtime Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gmf.runtime.* Gyrex Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gyrex.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.gemini.jpa_1.1.0.RELEASE.jar Web Tools Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.jpt.doc.user_3.2.0.v201305240436.jar Koneki Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.koneki.* Missing about.html in file: com.cforcoding.jmd_0.8.1.201305031130.jar Mylyn Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews.edit.source_2.0.0.I20130529-1332.jar Riena Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.riena.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.nebula.widgets.grid_1.0.0.HEAD.jar TCF Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.tcf.te.tcf.launch.cdt_1.1.0.201305210728.jar Xtext Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtend.* Missing about.html in file: org.eclipse.xtext.* m2e-wpt Missing about.html in file: org.sonatype.m2e.mavenarchiver_0.15.0.201207090125-signed-201209140800.jar BIRT Missing about.html in file: uk.co.spudsoft.birt.emitters.excel.source_4.3.0.v201306041519.jar Missing about.html in file: uk.co.spudsoft.birt.emitters.excel_4.3.0.v201306041519.jar Thanks, Wayne On 06/05/2013 02:58 PM, David M Williams wrote: Here we are, nearly at the end of RC3 (remember, staging repo builds close at 5 PM Eastern, unless someone notifies us here they need an extra hour or two). I am a little disappointed there is still so much work for some projects to do to meet minimum requirements to be released, http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/layoutCheck.txt http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/verifydiroutput/unsigned.txt But, I guess every year there are some projects that like to save it to the very end. The main purpose of this note is to educate everyone on some of the mechanics over the next few weeks what we call the Final daze. For those of you that have been through it before ... it's all the same ... just dates have changed ... but it wouldn't hurt for Project Leads and release engineers to re-read. For those of you new to Simultaneous Release, I hope you find it a helpful reference on how to make things go smoother, in a more coordinated way. http://wiki.eclipse.org/Kepler/Final_Daze After reading it, and the documents it links to, please ask here on cross-project list if there are questions, issues, or suggestions. Thanks, ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation Learn about Eclipse Projects ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
