CS: Legal-Lawful orders

2000-09-01 Thread John Hurst

From:   "John Hurst", [EMAIL PROTECTED]




CS: Legal-Lawful Orders

2000-08-31 Thread Jeremy

From:   Jeremy Peter Howells, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unfortunately police in several areas scored own goals
during the hand-in.  One of our local forces had the
firearms team, complete with body armour and holstered
handguns, manning the hand in office.  Intimidating?  Yes
several people I know who went through there thought so.

When one of them handling the paperwork commented on the
large number of variations, including gallery rifles and
BP pistols  - along the lines of 'Well I'm not sure what
WE will allow you'.  His reply along the lines of 'Well
I thought it was the law that said what I was allowed',
was met with the 'don't get stroppy with us sunshine'
response.

Other friends and aquaintances have reported many
inappropriate comments from so called firearms trained
officers who obviously knew very little or did not
consider their comments before they made them.

Considering one of our local police firearms team had
reportedly organised a sweepstake - the first team member
to shoot someone getting the pot.  Apparently they
eventually realised their mistake in setting the thing up
in the first place and reportedly gave the money to
charity.  I wonder what the media would have made of this
if they had shot someone?

Regards

Jerry
--
The local lot did the same thing at West Bromwich police
station.  They had a lot of complaints.  At HQ in the
centre of Birmingham it was a lot more relaxed.

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Legal-Lawful Orders

2000-08-28 Thread jonathan

From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I know each one of the officers personally who officiated
 at the infamous surrender of private property. I am
 staggered to hear you talk about them
 like this. I will take them to task!

Ah yes, but you are a fellow Police officer and It would be 
unlikely that they would treat you in a way that was 
calculated to annoy you. 

I have to agree with Dave that the crew who took my 
Pistols (probably the same guys as Dave's) did seem to 
enjoy what they were doing and didn't seem to mind that 
they were taking part in an excercise that was at best 
pointless and at worst state sanctioned theft. One of 
them didn't like me at all as I had previously refused to 
sign a statement for them against a local dealer they 
were persecuting, sorry, prosecuting and referred to me 
as a trouble maker. A remark that brought a rather swift 
apology when the full ramifications that could have 
resulted sunk in a few seconds later. I also have it on 
good authority that the same Officer at the case that 
resulted from this dealers persecution said to one of the 
Lawyers present something along the lines of "well now 
we've got their pistols, we can start on the shotguns 
next" to which said lawyer replied "Well you're not getting 
my bloody shotguns". 

No, these guys certainly did seem to be enjoying what 
they were doing.

Jonathan Laws. 

Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics




CS: Legal-Lawful Orders

2000-08-26 Thread IG

From:   "IG", [EMAIL PROTECTED]

My own experience of the police involvement with this evil
event come from the apparent joy these blokes gained
from being able to deprive innocent citizens of their
lawfully owned property. 

I know each one of the officers personally who officiated
at the infamous surrender of private property. I am
staggered to hear you talk about them
like this. I will take them to task!

' A constable is a citizen, locally appointed, with
authority under the Crown.His primary functions are the
protection of life and property, the prevention and
detection of crime and the prosecution of offenders against
the peace'

He or she takes an oath along the lines of..'I swear
by her sovereign lady the queen that I will faithfuly
uphold and discharge the duties of my office without
favour, affection, malice or ill will'.etc. Not the exact
wording but I can get it if anyone wants it.

These are the terms under which the police operate, along
with a 16 point disciplinary code that includes the
offences of 'neglect of duty', 'failing to conform to a
lawful order', discreditable conduct, etc. etc. The
punishments vary from a reprimand to dismissal and forfeiture
of pension rights.

I suppose IG could simply say that we could have all
refused to hand our stuff in, so we are as much to
blame as anyone, but we could have used some help.

Now, I wasnt going to say that, as I dont believe that
people should disobey or break a law, no matter how
repugnant it is to the individual, but the mere fact that
the overwhelming majority of shooters complied with the law
proves that we are law abiding and responsible. Can the same
credit not be bestowed upon the Police?
Are you saying, Steve and others, that the citizens who
were being disenfranchised should have been met by officers
who refused to take their firearms from them? That would
have been a nice safe way of getting out of it for the
private individuals. Or should, perhaps, the situation have
been that the citizens refused to hand things over and the
police should not have done anything about it?

Good idea, except when you look at it in reality, it would
only have taken one citizen or one police officer to depart
from that principle and the whole lot would founder. Collective
action only works if it is 100%, and in this case I think it
would be agreed that it would have been impossible.

Someone made reference to the poll tax riots earlier. I
quite agree, violent protest has, in the past, forced a
change in laws. Does anyone think, seriously, that violent
protest by firearms owners is going to get a law repealed?
Worse still, does anyone think that a sustained campaign of
terrorism is relevant to this issue? (As per the Gerry Adams
connection). I don't.

Heres a one to be going on with whilst I am away for the
weekend.  The police in the UK use .308's to destroy large
animals like bulls. (Yes, I know the story about the Rhino).
The favoured ammunition might be, for example, the 185gr.
lapua Mega. The weapon might be an Accuracy International.
What does the panel think about that?

IG
--
Like you, I used to think that following the law was a virtue.
And let me just say I go to excruciating lengths to follow
the law, and based on my personal experience I am the only
person in Walsall who does.

I no longer think that following the law is a virtue.  It
is a sickening burden, because I realised that the law is
written by a bunch of morons whose only real objective
is to get their name into the history books.  Whether or
not the law actually helps anyone is low on their list
of priorities.

One of the primary differences I noticed between living
here and the US is that in the US it is actually possible
to go through life without breaking any laws.  Here in
this country very often I hear people say: "Oh, that's
just a daft law, don't worry, the police will never
do you for it because they think it's stupid too."

People here are selective in which laws they follow,
simply because I think it is probably impossible to
follow them all as many of them contradict one another.

Steve.


Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org

List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics