Re: 20040214 no fix for unzip, cygwin debugging howto?

2004-02-15 Thread Thomas L Roche
Thomas L Roche Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:01:10 -0500
> Unfortunately 20040215 came out while I was debugging 20042014.
> Since you

do not

> claim to have done anything that might have actually fixed the
> problem, the results obtained at

> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00705.html

> are still relevant.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: 20040214 no fix for unzip, cygwin debugging howto?

2004-02-15 Thread Thomas L Roche
Christopher Faylor Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:12:02 -0500
> it occurred to me that I could add some increased debugging which
> might show why cmalloc was returning NULL.

How thoughtful of you.

> So, the next snapshot will have more strace output for the failing
> condition, meaning that if you do this:

>   strace -o strace.out unzip whatever

> it should produce a large strace file.  The only interesting output for
> now would come from the _csbrk function which will have words like
> "couldn't commit memory for cygwin heap..." in it.

> If you are interested in tracking this down, please send the information
> from that line here.

Unfortunately 20040215 came out while I was debugging 20042014. Since
you claim to have done anything that might have actually fixed the
problem, the results obtained at

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00705.html

are still relevant.

Christopher Faylor Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:36:44 -0500
> To be perfectly frank, your inability to figure anything out here
> seems to illustrate that you will not be able to provide any useful
> debugging details. Maybe you should do yourself a favor, standardize
> on 1.5.5 and just give up. If building and debugging is beyond your
> current skills then it's not likely that you'll be providing any
> useful feedback anytime soon.

"To be perfectly frank," your insolence is egregious; it will be
addressed separately.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



failure of unzip and recent cygwin1.dll

2004-02-15 Thread Thomas L Roche
summary:

unzip has been abending when run with recent cygwin1.dll: a gdb trace
(showing overflow?) and configuration information is included. I would
appreciate assistance locating the failing code(s) and the
maintainer(s) to contact.

details:

I would appreciate any assistance anyone could provide in debugging
the abends I (and at least one other user) have experienced running
unzip in cygwin > 1.5.5-1, and more importantly getting them fixed.
Note that

* the zips involved are very large (~= 1.5GB, 100k files) and contain
  mostly binaries, with some text (e.g. XML) and other compressed
  files (zip's and jar's)

* the point of failure is always a SEGV like

>> >   inflating:
>> 
/d/eclipse/builds/20040121_1953-WB213-AD-V512D-00/eclipse/plugins/com.ibm.etools.j2ee.ui/build/pluginBuild/commonbld/com/ibm/etools/ejb/ui/presentation/EJBEditorOutlineContentProvider.class

>> > 735 [main] unzip 1820 cmalloc: cmalloc returned NULL
>> > error:  zipfile probably corrupt (segmentation violation)

  but can be obtained even from a file that unzip'ed successfully with
  1.5.5-1, and can be unzip'ed with other tools (e.g. PowerArchiver).

* the point of failure is not otherwise repeatable. Specifically,
  unzip'ing the same file with different versions of cygwin1.dll
  produces SEGV at different inflation outputs. The only constant is
  the message "cmalloc: cmalloc returned NULL" (Hmm ... possible other
  constant: IIRC failing inflation output has always been a binary.)

I got the source of the 20040214 snapshot (almost the latest: 20040215
came out since I started debugging) built and debugging:

> cd /usr/src/unzip-5.50/.inst && gdb --args ./usr/bin/unzip.exe 
/d/eclipse/zips/wsa-jdk-20040210_1925-WB213-AD-V512D-W5.zip

unzip got fairly far (estimate ~80%) through the zip before 

>   inflating: 
runtimes/base_v5/installedApps/localhost/adminconsole.ear/adminconsole.war/com.ibm.ws.console.webservices/nl/zh_TW/504.gif
 
 
> 555 [main] unzip 2316 cmalloc: cmalloc returned NULL

> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> memcpy () at ../../../../../../newlib/libc/machine/i386/memcpy.S:53
> 53  ../../../../../../newlib/libc/machine/i386/memcpy.S: No such 
file or directory.
> in ../../../../../../newlib/libc/machine/i386/memcpy.S
> Current language:  auto; currently asm

Debugging trace follows (with some commentary), then `cygcheck -svr`
to end of post. If you have any advice concerning 

* the loci of failure

* additional investigation desired (apologies for lack of gdb chops)

* person(s) to contact pursuant to correcting the failure(s)

please let me know. Feel free to contact me directly (as well as the
lists), and to forward.

> (gdb) where

> #0  memcpy () at ../../../../../../newlib/libc/machine/i386/memcpy.S:53

> #1  0x61062a91 in path_conv::set_normalized_path(char const*) 
(this=0x616a2008, 
> path_copy=0x64964edc 
"/usr/src/unzip-5.50/.inst/runtimes/base_v5/installedApps/localhost/adminconsole.ear/adminconsole.war/com.ibm.ws.console.webservices/nl/zh_TW/504x.gif")
 
at ../../../../winsup/cygwin/path.cc:425

> #2  0x61027e81 in fhandler_base::set_name(path_conv&) (this=0x616a1fcc, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> at ../../../../winsup/cygwin/fhandler.cc:151

> #3  0x6101dee7 in build_fh_pc(path_conv&) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at 
../../../../winsup/cygwin/dtable.cc:468

> #4  0x6101dcf8 in build_fh_name(char const*, void*, unsigned, 
suffix_info*) (
> name=0x42a93c 
"runtimes/base_v5/installedApps/localhost/adminconsole.ear/adminconsole.war/com.ibm.ws.console.webservices/nl/zh_TW/504x.gif",
 
h=0x0, opt=18, si=0x6114b2e4) at ../../../../winsup/cygwin/dtable.cc:351

> #5  0x61095433 in stat_worker(char const*, __stat64*, int) (
> name=0x42a93c 
"runtimes/base_v5/installedApps/localhost/adminconsole.ear/adminconsole.war/com.ibm.ws.console.webservices/nl/zh_TW/504x.gif",
 
buf=0x0, nofollow=1) at ../../../../winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc:1151

> #6  0x61086f19 in _sigfe () at ../../../../winsup/cygwin/cygserver.h:82

> #7  0x0042a93c in G ()

> #8  0x0042a93c in G ()

> (gdb) info frame
> Stack level 0, frame at 0x22e9f0:
>  eip = 0x610cb1e4 in memcpy 
(../../../../../../newlib/libc/machine/i386/memcpy.S:53); saved eip 
0x61062a91
>  called by frame at 0x22ea20
>  source language asm.
>  Arglist at 0x22e9e8, args: 
>  Locals at 0x22e9e8, Previous frame's sp is 0x22e9f0
>  Saved registers:
>   ebx at 0x22e9dc, ebp at 0x22e9e8, esi at 0x22e9e4, edi at 0x22e9e0, 
eip at 0x22e9ec

> (gdb) info args
> No symbol table info available.

> (gdb) info locals
> No locals.

> (gdb) info catch
> No run-time support for this

> (gdb) up
> #1  0x61062a91 in path_conv::set_normalized_path(char const*) 
(this=0x616a2008, 
> path_copy=0x64964edc 
&qu

Re: 20040214 no fix for unzip

2004-02-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:06:32PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:59:30PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:16:59 -0500 -
>>> No one is *trying* to fix unzip,
>>
>>But are they trying to fix *cygwin1.dll*, which seems to have strewn
>>breakage in its wake?
>
>Feel free to check unzip after every dll update but I'm telling you that
>no one is investigating your problem.  Therefore, it is very unlikely
>that it will be fixed and, so, it will be basically noise for you to
>send email here reporting continued breakage.
>
>It is not useful to send a "it still doesn't work" message after new
>snapshots when there is no activity directed towards fixing your
>problem.

After sending this, it occurred to me that I could add some increased
debugging which might show why cmalloc was returning NULL.  So, the next
snapshot will have more strace output for the failing condition, meaning
that if you do this:

  strace -o strace.out unzip whatever

it should produce a large strace file.  The only interesting output for
now would come from the _csbrk function which will have words like
"couldn't commit memory for cygwin heap..." in it.

If you are interested in tracking this down, please send the information
from that line here.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Still trouble with IPC/cygipc

2004-02-15 Thread Jason Tishler
Frank,

On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 08:06:05AM +0100, Frank Wübbeling wrote:
> I execute it, it dies saying "bad system call". In the logs of
> cygserver, I get absolutely nothing.
>
> I feel completely lost here and have no idea what I could check to
> find an error.

Did you forgot to define CYGWIN=server on the client side?

Jason

-- 
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D  8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Why choice between unix and dos line endings?

2004-02-15 Thread Jan Bruun Andersen
Chuck Irvine wrote:

I can see no advantage of using unix line endings,
though I guess there must be one otherwise the option wouldn't be
offered. Can any one shed some light on this. Thanks
Let me give you an example. I work as an consultant, currently managing 
and doing system administration for a number of Sun Solaris servers.
The client I work for has standardised on Microsoft application on the 
desktop, including Visual SourceSafe for version control of 
configuration files, scripts, etc.

With my Cygwin installation set to use Unix line endings, and with my 
personalised SourceSafe INI-file set to also use Unix line endings, I 
can do a lot of work on my PC in the comfort of an Cygwin environment. I 
can edit the files in vi/vim, I can maintain Makefiles, etc. And when I 
am done, I can use ssh and scp to do a binary transfer of the files to 
the Solaris platform, knowing that the files will just work.

--
Jan Bruun Andersen
--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:55:44PM -0800, AG wrote:
>>Sounds to me like you want to read up on exim  to
>>see what it can do and if it will work for you.  Discussion of exim's
>>capabilities compared to sendmail is really off-topic for this list.
>
>Agreed.
>
>But as I responded to Brian earlier in private email: a bit of googling
>reveals problem reports describing why EXIM is not 100% compatible with
>sendmail, at least from the point of view of NMH used in a TMDA spam
>filtering configuration.
>
>Is it compatible enough for me to use?  Well, I'll suppose I'll see.

Can we stop discussing this now?  Whether it is compatible for you
or not is really irrelevant to the cygwin mailing list population.

If you or someone else wants to offer to maintain sendmail as a package
then they should go through the very simple package submission process.
Otherwise, I don't see any reason to continue this discussion.  We don't
add packages on an as-needed basis.  We add them on an as-volunteered
basis.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: SSH and Remote Key authentication

2004-02-15 Thread Norman Vine
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> 
> First off, if I'm reading the debug output correctly, sshd is complaining
> about the ownership of the home directory *on the server*.  Is $HOST a
> remote machine, or your local (Windows/Cygwin) one?

Doh !!

Thank you for pointing out the obvious :-)

Every thing works as expected once I correct the permissions on the server

Thanks again

Norman

> 
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Norman Vine wrote:
> 
> > Hi all
> >
> > I am trying to use SSH remote key authentication
> > It appears as if the remote $HOST does not like
> > the permissions on my home dir

> > debug1: Remote: Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for directory 
> > /home/$USER
> > ^^^
> > debug1: Server refused our key.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SSH and Remote Key authentication

2004-02-15 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
First off, if I'm reading the debug output correctly, sshd is complaining
about the ownership of the home directory *on the server*.  Is $HOST a
remote machine, or your local (Windows/Cygwin) one?

If $HOST is your local Cygwin machine, note the '+'s after the modes in
the ls output.  They indicate that there are ACLs on the directories not
directly mappable to the normal Unix modes.  The output of "getfacl ~
~/.ssh" should show what those are.  If "StrictModes" is set in your sshd
config, your home directory should not be writable by anyone but you, and
your ~/.ssh should not be readable, writable, or executable by anyone but
you.

Lastly, again if $HOST is the local Cygwin machine, make sure "ntsec" is
set in the CYGWIN environment variable for sshd (or, rather, that it's not
turned off by "nontsec").
Igor
P.S. You *did* use the supported way (i.e., ssh-host-config) to set up
your Cygwin sshd server, right?

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Norman Vine wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I am trying to use SSH remote key authentication
> It appears as if the remote $HOST does not like
> the permissions on my home dir
>
> Any guidance appreciated
> TIA
> Norman
>
> $ cd ~
>
> $ ls -ld
> drwxr-xr-x+  21 $USER  None32768 Feb 13 06:29 .
>
> $ ls -ld .ssh
> drwx--+   3 $USER  None 4096 Feb 12 13:49 .ssh
>
> $ ssh -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> OpenSSH_3.7.1p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003
> debug1: Reading configuration data /home/$USER/.ssh/config
> debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config
> debug1: Connecting to $HOST [128.128.109.18] port 22.
> debug1: Connection established.
> debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/identity type 0
> debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
> debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/id_dsa type 2
> debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_3.1p1
> debug1: match: OpenSSH_3.1p1 pat OpenSSH_2.*,OpenSSH_3.0*,OpenSSH_3.1*
> debug1: Local version string SSH-1.5-OpenSSH_3.7.1p2
> debug1: Waiting for server public key.
> debug1: Received server public key (768 bits) and host key (1024 bits).
> debug1: Host '$HOST' is known and matches the RSA1 host key.
> debug1: Found key in /home/$USER/.ssh/known_hosts:17
> debug1: Encryption type: 3des
> debug1: Sent encrypted session key.
> debug1: Installing crc compensation attack detector.
> debug1: Received encrypted confirmation.
> debug1: Trying RSA authentication with key '/home/$USER/.ssh/identity'
> debug1: Remote: Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for directory 
> /home/$USER
> ^^^
> debug1: Server refused our key.
> debug1: Doing challenge response authentication.
> debug1: No challenge.
> debug1: Doing password authentication.

-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: SSH and Remote Key authentication

2004-02-15 Thread Norman Vine
Larry Hall writes:
> 
> At 03:43 PM 2/15/2004, Norman Vine you wrote:
> >Larry Hall writes:
> >> 
> >> At 03:25 PM 2/15/2004, Norman Vine you wrote:
> >> >Hi all
> >> >
> >> >I am trying to use SSH remote key authentication  
> >> >It appears as if the remote $HOST does not like 
> >> >the permissions on my home dir
> >> >
> >> >Any guidance appreciated
> >> >
> >> >$ ssh -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> >debug1: Remote: Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for directory 
> >> >/home/$USER
> >> >^^^
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Sounds like a simple permissions problem on ~/.ssh/identity.  Your best
> >> bet is to read up on openssh docs so that you're sure you get everything 
> >> configured correctly
> >
> >AFAICT I have the correct permissions on ~/.ssh/identity
> >and the permissions on the $HOST files are identical to 
> >those that [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses to connect from a remote Linux machine
> >
> >$ cd ~
> >$ ls -la .ssh/identity
> >-rw---1 $USER  None  525 Feb 12 14:51 .ssh/identity
> 
> OK then.  I agree, that looks fine.  So since this is all the information
> you've given, besides a possible implication that you can ssh to the $HOST
> machine from a Linux machine, I can't really help much.  

I do appreciate your help, and hopefully I have included enough info this time :-)

> If you can ssh in
> from a Linux machine, try comparing all differences between that machine
> and the problem "box" and see if you can find what's missing.  

Note I can ssh in using password authrntication from my Cygwin box 
hence the subject line 
but you are correct I should have explicitly stated this.

> You could 
> also turn on debugging on the server to help, though I think the message
> you got already is pretty clear about what it thinks the problem is.  Check
> the permissions real close (use 'getfacl' if you need to), 

I too am reasonably sure this is a 'local permissions' problem 
i.e. The remote sshd daemon does not believe my identity file is secure

My problem is that I do not know what the proper permissions should be, and 
AFAIK these are the permissions set by the the Cygwin install proceedure as
I do not believe I have touched them

$ ls -ld /
drwxrwxr-x+  20 admins   Administ 14520320 Feb 10 16:27 /

$ ls -ld /home
drwxrwxr-x+   8 admins   Administ 4096 Nov  3  2001 /home

$ ls -ld /home/nhv
drwxr-xr-x+  21 nhv  None32768 Feb 13 06:29 /home/nhv

$ ls -ld /home/nhv/.ssh
drwx--+   3 nhv  None 4096 Feb 12 13:49 /home/nhv/.ssh

$ ls -ld /home/nhv/.ssh/identity
-rw---1 nhv  None  525 Feb 12 14:51 /home/nhv/.ssh/identity

attached find the result of 
 cygcheck -s -v -r > cygcheck.out

Thanks again

Norman

cygcheck.out
Description: Binary data
--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] CLISP 2.32-2 is available

2004-02-15 Thread Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
> CLISP 2.32-2 (marked `testing') is a CVS HEAD snapshot,
> _not_ an official release.   beware.

This builds CVS maxima OOTB.  All maxima tests pass.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Known feature?

2004-02-15 Thread linda w
I decided to trace a 3 day long running process (the dd/bzip program) 
that was
nearing completion (had a couple hundred meg to go), and much to my 
chagrin,
when I wanted to stop tracing, I pressed control-c -- and unlike the 
behavior I'm
used to in linux, it didn't just terminate the process being traced, but 
also
terminated the program that had been attached to!

Very very much of a bummer, since it takes 3+ days, apparently, to run 
and come near
to completing this test.  Very, very sadoh well...

Is this a "feature" or a "bug"?

:-(
-linda
--
   In the marketplace of "Real goods", capitalism is limited by safety
   regulations, consumer protection laws, and product liability.  In
   the computer industry, what protects the consumer?


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: only use "/" in values, not names..?]

2004-02-15 Thread linda w


Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, linda w wrote:
 

[snip]
Speaking of compatibility -- there is only 1 application I know of that
uses "/" in keynames -- Cygwin.  Since it's already been noted that this
makes it very awkward to access these keys in /proc, perhaps cygwin
could op for better windows compatibility and go with the unofficial
custom of not using "/" in keynames?  Many or most examples I've seen of
manipulating the registry show the use of some "change separator"
facility and then use "/" as the example separator in code examples --
as "/" is already the separator in other parts of the OS and "\" is a
pain to use since most modern languages use it for literalizing the next
character
What do you think?  Are these fixable/changable?

Thanks,
-linda
   


Technically, Cygwin doesn't use "/" in keynames -- it uses it in value
names.

 

===
   Yeah yeah yeah...and I probably don't cross all my t's either! :-)
I believe that backward compatibility will preclude any attempts to change
the mount key names...  Especially with the plans to move the mount
information out of the registry altogether, the extra effort to change the
key names now is probably not justified.
 


   ?   If it's moved out of the registry, that's fine, but if it isn't, I'd
have to ask how many apps rely on this functionality and whether or not it
really would break anything.  Certainly moving it out of the registry
entirely would have no less impact on "backward compatibility"...ahem!
Sometimes I get the idea that you are are onery/cantankerous just to be
so, not always for reasons you strongly believe in...as though you like 
to play "devil's advocate", so to speak, just because!  :-)

I don't see that as much of a problem, though.  Most command-line registry
manipulating tools (including Cygwin's regtool) provide a way to change
the key/value separator.  API calls don't care one way or another, as they
walk through keys as explicit strings, and rarely do parsing.
The only mechanism I can think of that is adversely affected by this
convention is /proc/registry, because of its attempt to map the registry
onto a filesystem. 

---
   Attempt?  It seems like a pretty darn good idea/attempt.  What is 
the registry but a hierarchical, typed, filesystem? 
It even needs to be "defragged" like a primitive filesystem.
Often, I wish users could supply their own registry manipulation 
routines that do things like keep key
creation and access times, what user or program created
the key, etc., so later on it would be easier to delete old
cruft.

   But specifically, the power of unix, traditionally, was the 
orthongonality of the various command line tools and the ability to pipe 
output from one program into another.  Wouldn't it be rather 'cool'/nice 
to be able to manipulate and edit the registry using the same tools you 
can use on files. 

   Never have entirely figured out why, but accessing keys in the 
registry seems so dang slow and the only tools to mess with the registry 
are cumbersome and error-prone and designed to be dangerous and obscure 
to incline people not to edit it directly.  The concept of an editor, in 
this day and age not having an "Undo" feature.  Not having drag and drop 
-- but if it was a file system, the you could use explorer to drag/drop 
it and have automatic undo functionality.  MS likes to keep users 
ignorant and uninformed so they can play fast and loose with bad 
algorithms and code, hinder reverse engineering and create obstacles to 
using mixed-OS environments.

Because the registry doesn't have the same set of
invalid characters in names as the underlying filesystem, this mapping
sometimes fails, as in the case of mounts values.  It might be possible to
change the /proc/registry implementation to translate "/"s in key and
value names to valid character combinations (e.g., URL encoding).  PTC.
	Igor
 

   True, but it also would also seem prudent not to be the
only known (to me, at least) application to use a specific feature -- I 
could easily see MS restricting "/" from
key/value names in a future OS release, possibly, even, to
support their own Unix compatibility efforts.

   As for the registry concept, in general, I don't think it would be 
the worst idea to implement on Unix/Linux systems -- like 
/etc/sysconfig+/proc+multiple ..rc files.

   Rather than having each app use it's own method of storing config 
values, and many apps using 100 bytes out of a 4k allocation unit, it 
might not be so bad to have a "registry" file system type that would 
allow storing of small config values in many small spread-out randomly 
named and placed config files.  If you had a per-system, and a per-user 
file,
it would make saving the config state of a machine or a user's
preferences trivial to copy to a new machine, potentially.

Linda

--
   In the marketplace of "Real goods", capitalism is limited by safety
   regulations, consumer protection laws, and product liability.  In
   the computer

DBD::Pg - $dbh->quote() causes core dump

2004-02-15 Thread Ian Sealy
Hi,

Is anyone using the DBD::Pg Perl module under Cygwin? I'm trying to use
it on Windows XP with Perl 5.8.2-1 and DBI 1.40. The Cygwin DLL version
is 1.5.7.

The module seems to build OK, but lots of the tests fail. The most
serious (from my point of view, because I tried to use the module
anyway) is that $dbh->quote() causes a core dump:

Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=610AB121
eax=4C554E27 ebx=4C557573 ecx=BDD4BB01 edx=274C esi=0A2A0930 edi=0A2A3074
ebp=0022EAF8 esp=0022EAE0 program=D:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe
cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs= ss=0023
Stack trace:
Frame Function  Args
0022EAF8  610AB121  (, 0A2EA954, 0022EB18, 6109E779)
0022EB28  61054C25  (0A2A0930, 0A2EA954, 0003, 0002)
0022EB58  61086391  (0A040268, 0A28CC50, 0A13CF90, )
0022ED38  0093E12E  (0A040268, 0A180540, 0A040268, )
0022EDA8  6EC71086  (0A040268, 0A040268, 0022EDD8, 6EC04998)
0022EDB8  6EC69529  (0A040268, 61110400, 0022EDD8, 61087CB6)
0022EDD8  6EC04998  (0A040268, 0001, 0022EED8, 0001)
0022EF08  6EC04775  (0A040268, 00401220, 0003, 61673F04)
0022EF40  004011E2  (0003, 61673F04, 0A0400A8, 0022EF98)
0022EF80  61005DF0  (0022EF98, C0150008, , 536CD652)
0022FF90  61005EE8  (, , , )
End of stack trace

Any idea what's wrong?

Cheers,
Ian

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Solved: Still trouble with IPC

2004-02-15 Thread Charles Wilson
Frank Wübbeling wrote:
Looking at the cygwin sources, I realized that any access to cygserver is
disabled unless I explicitly export CYGWIN="server=1". Doing this
immediately solved my problems. Weird. Since cygserver is now the default
IPC code, shouldn't the default for allow_server be "yes"?
Not until all of the software that is part of the distribution which 
currently uses cygipc has been officially switched over to using 
cygserver.  At present, this includes

  postgresql
  cygwin-xfree (all packages)
  xemacs
  GraphicsMagick
  ImageMagick
  gd
  ddd
  gv
  xaw3d
  openbox
  fvwm
  x2x
  lesstif
  xwinclip
I'm not sure how many of these directly use cygipc themselves, or just 
need it because they're X programs, and XFree86 needs it.

--
Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-15 Thread AG
> Sounds to me like you want to read up on exim  to 
> see what it can do and if it will work for you.  Discussion of exim's 
> capabilities compared to sendmail is really off-topic for this list.

Agreed.

But as I responded to Brian earlier in private email:
a bit of googling reveals problem reports describing
why EXIM is not 100% compatible with sendmail,
at least from the point of view of NMH used in
a TMDA spam filtering configuration.

Is it compatible enough for me to use?  Well, I'll
suppose I'll see.  



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: SSH and Remote Key authentication

2004-02-15 Thread Larry Hall
At 03:43 PM 2/15/2004, Norman Vine you wrote:
>Larry Hall writes:
>> 
>> At 03:25 PM 2/15/2004, Norman Vine you wrote:
>> >Hi all
>> >
>> >I am trying to use SSH remote key authentication  
>> >It appears as if the remote $HOST does not like 
>> >the permissions on my home dir
>> >
>> >Any guidance appreciated
>> >
>> >$ cd ~
>> >
>> >$ ls -ld
>> >drwxr-xr-x+  21 $USER  None32768 Feb 13 06:29 .
>> >
>> >$ ls -ld .ssh
>> >drwx--+   3 $USER  None 4096 Feb 12 13:49 .ssh
>> >
>> >$ ssh -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >debug1: Remote: Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for directory 
>> >/home/$USER
>> >^^^
>> > 
>> 
>> Sounds like a simple permissions problem on ~/.ssh/identity.  Your best
>> bet is to read up on openssh docs so that you're sure you get everything 
>> configured correctly
>
>AFAICT I have the correct permissions on ~/.ssh/identity
>and the permissions on the $HOST files are identical to 
>those that [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses to connect from a remote Linux machine
>
>$ cd ~
>$ ls -la .ssh/identity
>-rw---1 $USER  None  525 Feb 12 14:51 .ssh/identity
>
>Thanks


OK then.  I agree, that looks fine.  So since this is all the information
you've given, besides a possible implication that you can ssh to the $HOST
machine from a Linux machine, I can't really help much.  If you can ssh in
from a Linux machine, try comparing all differences between that machine
and the problem "box" and see if you can find what's missing.  You could 
also turn on debugging on the server to help, though I think the message
you got already is pretty clear about what it thinks the problem is.  Check
the permissions real close (use 'getfacl' if you need to), read the docs - 
Cywgin-specific and otherwise, and narrow down the potential problem areas.  
If you find a Cygwin specific issue, I'd encourage you again to read and 
follow the guidelines of  before consulting 
the email list further.  But I still suspect that your problems aren't Cygwin
specific but rather installation-specfic, though information that 
 asks for might indicate otherwise.  Feel
free to prove my suppositions wrong of course.



--
Larry Hall  http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.  (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746 


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: SSH and Remote Key authentication

2004-02-15 Thread Norman Vine
Larry Hall writes:
> 
> At 03:25 PM 2/15/2004, Norman Vine you wrote:
> >Hi all
> >
> >I am trying to use SSH remote key authentication  
> >It appears as if the remote $HOST does not like 
> >the permissions on my home dir
> >
> >Any guidance appreciated
> >
> >$ cd ~
> >
> >$ ls -ld
> >drwxr-xr-x+  21 $USER  None32768 Feb 13 06:29 .
> >
> >$ ls -ld .ssh
> >drwx--+   3 $USER  None 4096 Feb 12 13:49 .ssh
> >
> >$ ssh -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> >debug1: Remote: Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for directory 
> >/home/$USER
> >^^^
> > 
> 
> Sounds like a simple permissions problem on ~/.ssh/identity.  Your best
> bet is to read up on openssh docs so that you're sure you get everything 
> configured correctly

AFAICT I have the correct permissions on ~/.ssh/identity
and the permissions on the $HOST files are identical to 
those that [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses to connect from a remote Linux machine

$ cd ~
$ ls -la .ssh/identity
-rw---1 $USER  None  525 Feb 12 14:51 .ssh/identity

Thanks

Norman


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: SSH and Remote Key authentication

2004-02-15 Thread Larry Hall
At 03:25 PM 2/15/2004, Norman Vine you wrote:
>Hi all
>
>I am trying to use SSH remote key authentication  
>It appears as if the remote $HOST does not like 
>the permissions on my home dir
>
>Any guidance appreciated
>
>TIA
>
>Norman
>
>$ cd ~
>
>$ ls -ld
>drwxr-xr-x+  21 $USER  None32768 Feb 13 06:29 .
>
>$ ls -ld .ssh
>drwx--+   3 $USER  None 4096 Feb 12 13:49 .ssh
>
>$ ssh -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>OpenSSH_3.7.1p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003
>debug1: Reading configuration data /home/$USER/.ssh/config
>debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config
>debug1: Connecting to $HOST [128.128.109.18] port 22.
>debug1: Connection established.
>debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/identity type 0
>debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
>debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/id_dsa type 2
>debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_3.1p1
>debug1: match: OpenSSH_3.1p1 pat OpenSSH_2.*,OpenSSH_3.0*,OpenSSH_3.1*
>debug1: Local version string SSH-1.5-OpenSSH_3.7.1p2
>debug1: Waiting for server public key.
>debug1: Received server public key (768 bits) and host key (1024 bits).
>debug1: Host '$HOST' is known and matches the RSA1 host key.
>debug1: Found key in /home/$USER/.ssh/known_hosts:17
>debug1: Encryption type: 3des
>debug1: Sent encrypted session key.
>debug1: Installing crc compensation attack detector.
>debug1: Received encrypted confirmation.
>debug1: Trying RSA authentication with key '/home/$USER/.ssh/identity'
>debug1: Remote: Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for directory 
>/home/$USER
>^^^
>
>debug1: Server refused our key.
>debug1: Doing challenge response authentication.
>debug1: No challenge.
>debug1: Doing password authentication.
>


Please read and follow the link below for all bug reports:

>Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html


Sounds like a simple permissions problem on ~/.ssh/identity.  Your best
bet is to read up on openssh docs so that you're sure you get everything 
configured correctly.  FWIW, I doubt that this is a Cygwin specific issue
but there isn't really enough information here for me to tell for sure one
way or the other.  But you might also find the email archives helpful.  
There's been lots of people that ask about configuring openssh for Cygwin
here.



--
Larry Hall  http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.  (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746 


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



SSH and Remote Key authentication

2004-02-15 Thread Norman Vine
Hi all

I am trying to use SSH remote key authentication  
It appears as if the remote $HOST does not like 
the permissions on my home dir

Any guidance appreciated

TIA

Norman

$ cd ~

$ ls -ld
drwxr-xr-x+  21 $USER  None32768 Feb 13 06:29 .

$ ls -ld .ssh
drwx--+   3 $USER  None 4096 Feb 12 13:49 .ssh

$ ssh -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenSSH_3.7.1p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003
debug1: Reading configuration data /home/$USER/.ssh/config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config
debug1: Connecting to $HOST [128.128.109.18] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/identity type 0
debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: identity file /home/$USER/.ssh/id_dsa type 2
debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_3.1p1
debug1: match: OpenSSH_3.1p1 pat OpenSSH_2.*,OpenSSH_3.0*,OpenSSH_3.1*
debug1: Local version string SSH-1.5-OpenSSH_3.7.1p2
debug1: Waiting for server public key.
debug1: Received server public key (768 bits) and host key (1024 bits).
debug1: Host '$HOST' is known and matches the RSA1 host key.
debug1: Found key in /home/$USER/.ssh/known_hosts:17
debug1: Encryption type: 3des
debug1: Sent encrypted session key.
debug1: Installing crc compensation attack detector.
debug1: Received encrypted confirmation.
debug1: Trying RSA authentication with key '/home/$USER/.ssh/identity'
debug1: Remote: Authentication refused: bad ownership or modes for directory 
/home/$USER
^^^

debug1: Server refused our key.
debug1: Doing challenge response authentication.
debug1: No challenge.
debug1: Doing password authentication.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-15 Thread Robert R Schneck
AG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NMH can be configured to send email directly to an SMTP server,
> but this is not sufficient to meet my needs
>a) this is a TabletPC, a mobile device, which frequently is not 
>connected.  I.e. outgoing mail needs to be queued and sent
>later when the outgoing SMTP server is accessible.
>b) I need to route email selectively: my company mail is not
>supposed to go through my personal, non-company, ISP,
>and vice versa.
>
> In my limited understanding I require more than just connecting
> to an SMTP server; I need a mail transport agent that can queue
> outgoing mail for several different outgoing mail servers.

In principle ssmtp is a drop-in replacement from sendmail, but it 
doesn't have full sendmail functionality; it will ignore or bomb on 
most command-line options.

All that ssmtp can do is forward mail to an SMTP server.
It can choose which server selectively based on the From address.
It doesn't queue; but I use it on a frequently unconnected machine, with 
a homegrown script to queue mail in such a way that I can ssmtp it 
later.  ssmtp has the benefit of being trivial to configure.

Exim is much more powerful, and almost certainly can be used as a 
complete drop-in sendmail replacement in the way you want.

Robert


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: dd if=/dev/sda3 bs=1024 conv=sync|bzip2 >//server/backups/windows_backup.bz2?

2004-02-15 Thread Brian Dessent
linda w wrote:
> 
> I thought the above would yield an image backup of my windows partition.

If this is a windows system drive (i.e. containing %WINDIR% and boot
files) then I don't think this will work.  I could be wrong here but I
think there are parts of the disk that are inaccessable while windows is
running, e.g. the SAM database.  These segments can only be read by the
kernel itself, and to back them up you have to do it offline using the
Recovery Console or from booting another partition.  I think you'll find
that Cygwin makes a very poor choice for a backup tool, as compared to
things dedicated to this task such as NTbackup, Ghost, etc.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: Plausibility of sendmail?

2004-02-15 Thread Larry Hall
At 02:17 AM 2/15/2004, AG you wrote:
>I didn't want to send this to the whole [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list,
>but when I googled for "cygwin sendmail" Brian's email asking why
>in the world anyone would want to run sendmail on cygwin came up
>first.
>
>Here's why I am interested:
>
>(0) I am *not* interested in running a production mail server
>under CYGWIN
>
>(1) I want to use CYGWIN to allow me to use NMH to read email
>on my TabletPC running Windows XP TabletPC edition - and to finally
>allow me to get off Microsoft Outlook.
>
>I want to read email on my TabletPC because, well, I *like* the TabletPC
>even if it is not UNIX. And Linux does not yet run on the TabletPC and
>preserve many of the useful TabletPC features.
>
>(By the way, I do not want to run NMH on VMware on my TabletPC 
>because I have run VMware, in the past, and find that VMware is much 
>more of a hassle than CYGWIN.)
>
>NMH can be configured to send email directly to an SMTP server,
>but this is not sufficient to meet my needs
>   a) this is a TabletPC, a mobile device, which frequently is not 
>   connected.  I.e. outgoing mail needs to be queued and sent
>   later when the outgoing SMTP server is accessible.
>   b) I need to route email selectively: my company mail is not
>   supposed to go through my personal, non-company, ISP,
>   and vice versa.
>
>In my limited understanding I require more than just connecting
>to an SMTP server; I need a mail transport agent that can queue
>outgoing mail for several different outgoing mail servers.
>
>
>Why SendMail?   Yes, I know just how horrible sendmail is.
>I welcome advice on alternatives, such as exim or ssmtp.
>
>The main reason I am interested in using SendMail on CYGWIN
>with NMH is that NMH already has support for talking to SendMail:
>in /usr/local/nmh/mts.conf, you can just say "SendMail", and it is
>supposed to work. 
>
>Yes, that leaves the ugly job of doing a sendmail.cf;
>but my configuration is simple enough that I can crib most of
>it.
>
>Now, I have never used ssmtp or exim.  Are they really drop in replacements
>for sendmail from the commandline / protocol level?   (Not from the
>sendmail.cf file level.) 
>
>I.e. if I configure NMH by putting the path to exim in the SendMail entry in mts.conf,
>will it just work?


Sounds to me like you want to read up on exim  to 
see what it can do and if it will work for you.  Discussion of exim's 
capabilities compared to sendmail is really off-topic for this list.



--
Larry Hall  http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.  (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746 


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Valentine's snapshot rules (was: Re: latest CVS: make hangs on XP (with HT))

2004-02-15 Thread Rolf Campbell
I just tried the feb 14th snapshot on my XP(HT) machine, and the my test 
ran over 5100 iterations before finnaly exhausting my disk space with 
strace output, but there were NO FAILURES!!  I'm going to let it run 
with strace turned off just to see how far it will go, but this looks 
very good.

Rolf Campbell wrote:
I tried using lates CVS too, here are the results:

Time to freeze: 761 and 409 iterations

This is MUCH better than before, but it still does freeze (althought a 
big difference now is that when make freezes, it consumes no CPU).

I'm speculating it has something to do with:
"trying to send sig 20 but signal 20 already armed"
Here is an strace tail from the process that froze:


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: Why choice between unix and dos line endings?

2004-02-15 Thread Larry Hall
At 09:10 PM 2/14/2004, Chuck Irvine you wrote:
>Something I've never been able to figure out is why Cygwin offers to
>install with the choice of either dos or unix line endings. The way I
>see it is that using dos line endings allows for good integration with
>native windows apps. I can see no advantage of using unix line endings,
>though I guess there must be one otherwise the option wouldn't be
>offered. Can any one shed some light on this. Thanks
>
>Chuck


By definition, there's only 1 reason to choose UNIX over DOS as an 
installation option.  It facilitates the use of packages that have not been 
completely/properly ported to Windows.  If you want maximum compatibility 
with UNIX apps, choose UNIX.  Otherwise, choose DOS.  Practically, this 
boils down to the fact that you'll run into less trouble overall (whether 
using Windows or Cygwin apps) with the UNIX setting.  But there are certain 
usage patterns that make it reasonable to offer the option.  So the 
recommendation here is to use UNIX unless you know of a reason you need to 
do otherwise.



--
Larry Hall  http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.  (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746 


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



dd if=/dev/sda3 bs=1024 conv=sync|bzip2 >//server/backups/windows_backup.bz2?

2004-02-15 Thread linda w
I thought the above would yield an image backup of my windows partition.

It does seem to, at first, but for some odd reason or another, it really 
starts slowing down toward the end of the partition.  (Took about 2-3 
days vs. ~2-3 hours under linux).  Which
would be a first RFE -- but as an ex-manager at SGI used to say, it's 
only performance -- as long as it works, that's the primary concern.

But it doesn't seem to know when to stop.

"df" claims:
C:30813648  15304720  15508928  50% /
That would be 30,813,648 1k-blocks or 31,553,175,552 bytes.

Examination of the output of a "dd" shows it is accessing the correct 
partition.

However, at some point, it reached a point where bzip2 stopped
pegging the cpu and dd started being the most guilty party -- at about 
60-70% pegging with csrss.exe taking up the slack at
20-30% cpu (was 0 when bzip was crunching along at high speed).
It will stay like that for a few minutes, at least, then bzip2
will arise from the dead

Now, looking at I/O read/write bytes, I see:
 input   output
dd   29,921,032,311   29,920,942,080
bzip229,920,931,5949,655,162,880
peak working sets for both show bzip2 peaking at ~8.8M and dd at 2 meg.  
They started 69 hours ago with cpu times for both
(dd,bzip) showing 10.5 and 20.5 hours, respectively.

When they started, the output of bzip2 on the server was
increasing file size at the rate of, roughly, 800-900k/second.
Now the file size is increasing at the rate of about 600 bytes/second.

So what the bleep?  I know bzip2 can be slow at times, but output of 600 
bytes/sec?
Server shows zero load, roughly 6G free -- not likely to be a source of 
delay.

The read seem to show a logorithmic slowdown -- not sure if it will ever 
finish at this
rate.  Any idea why it would slow down so much?  I know 'dd' chokes 
somewhat on large files -- or used to as of a few months ago.  Was 
written a bit inefficiently for reading from
random access devices -- telling it to "skip" blocks at the beginning 1) 
didn't like >4 byte
integers, and 2) used the "read" call to skip the bytes.  Meaning you 
can't copy the
last 100 bytes of a 30G file by seeking to it as one might expect, but 
instead, 'dd' reads the data on disk.  Might be necessary if blocks are 
variable length defined by line feeds, but
certainly a drag for what is the more common case (for me) of using 
fixed size blocks.

But bzip seems to be hogging the cpu again nowcranking out ...well 
down to 500 or
so bytes/second now...(sigh).

Wouldl be cool if this worked "right" and would be open-software's 
answer to
the 60-70$ "disk image" program by "Overpriced SW Inc.".

-linda

--
   In the marketplace of "Real goods", capitalism is limited by safety
   regulations, consumer protection laws, and product liability.  In
   the computer industry, what protects the consumer?


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: 20040214 no fix for unzip

2004-02-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:59:30PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>Christopher Faylor Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:16:59 -0500 -
>> No one is *trying* to fix unzip,
>
>But are they trying to fix *cygwin1.dll*, which seems to have strewn
>breakage in its wake?

Feel free to check unzip after every dll update but I'm telling you that
no one is investigating your problem.  Therefore, it is very unlikely
that it will be fixed and, so, it will be basically noise for you to
send email here reporting continued breakage.

It is not useful to send a "it still doesn't work" message after new
snapshots when there is no activity directed towards fixing your
problem.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: 20040214 no fix for unzip

2004-02-15 Thread Thomas L Roche
Christopher Faylor Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:16:59 -0500 -
> No one is *trying* to fix unzip,

But are they trying to fix *cygwin1.dll*, which seems to have strewn
breakage in its wake?


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: cygwin debugging howto? was: cygwin1-20040213 hoses emacs 'desktop'

2004-02-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:11:45PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>Igor Pechtchanski 02/14/2004 10:58:24 AM:
>> Please try to configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses
>
>Notes?  Sorry, that's the sort of thing I normally strip out in
>emacs. "Hosing emacs considered harmful."
>
>On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>>> * I coulda been debugging this at least a week ago if anyone had
>>>   done howto's for debugging cygwin
>
>> There is such a HOWTO.
>
>Where? FWIW searching this list for "debug cygwin howto" gets nothing
>useful; googling gets my post
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg35156.html
>
>hmm ... do you mean
>
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/insight/2001-q4/msg00161.html
>> Here's the (incomplete) howto on cygwin debugging.
>
>> 1. The first thing you'll need to do is to build cygwin1.dll and
>> your crashed application from sources. To debug them you'll need
>> debug information, which is normally stripped from executables.
>
>"incomplete," yes; "howto," no ... Were you referring to something
>more complete/howto-like?

Your attempts to convince us that this is incomplete are rather...
incomplete.  Are you complaining because the howto has the audacity
to assume that you will be able to build things yourself?  Or do you
think a debugging howto should go into excruciating detail about how to
build things, too?  It's odd that you are complaining about something
that is unclear to you in an unclear fashion.

If it is the build instructions, then yeah, it's incomplete because it
either 1) expects that like other GNU-style projects you'll be able to
build things with a minimum amount of angst or 2) you'll be clever
enough to find more instructions (on building cygwin at least) in the
FAQ.

FWIW, typing "building cygwin from source" into google picks up a cygwin
thread where someone else was whining about how bad the instructions are
(which will now be typically used as an "Aha!  See I'm not alone!" and
will force me to use all of the same arguments again.  Stay tuned.) but
has a link to the instructions.  So, if it is the whole build mystery
that is tripping you up then it's a mystery why we are still talking
about this since you apparently have some passing familiarity with
google.

To be perfectly frank, your inability to figure anything out here seems
to illustrate that you will not be able to provide any useful debugging
details.  Maybe you should do yourself a favor, standardize on 1.5.5
and just give up.  If building and debugging is beyond your current
skills then it's not likely that you'll be providing any useful feedback
anytime soon.  I'm sure you have better things to do with your time than
bumping your head against debugging instructions that are obviously
intended for someone with more c++/gdb/GNU experience than you possess.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: 20040214 no fix for unzip

2004-02-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 12:11:44PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>Not debugging, just a straight run:

No one is *trying* to fix unzip, so there is no reason to report
failures for every snapshot.  That's going to get boring quickly.

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



20040214 unhoses emacs 'desktop'

2004-02-15 Thread Thomas L Roche
Life much improved, thanks ...


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



20040214 no fix for unzip

2004-02-15 Thread Thomas L Roche
Not debugging, just a straight run:

  inflating: 
/d/eclipse/builds/20040210_1925-WB213-AD-V512D-W5/eclipse/plugins/com.ibm.etools.webservice.explorer/wsexplorer/src/com/ibm/etools/webservice/explorer/uddi/perspective/UDDIMainNode.java
 
 
476 [main] unzip 2980 cmalloc: cmalloc returned NULL
error:  zipfile probably corrupt (segmentation violation)

will debug mañana ...


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



cygwin debugging howto? was: cygwin1-20040213 hoses emacs 'desktop'

2004-02-15 Thread Thomas L Roche
Igor Pechtchanski 02/14/2004 10:58:24 AM:
> Please try to configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses

Notes?  Sorry, that's the sort of thing I normally strip out in
emacs. "Hosing emacs considered harmful."

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>> * I coulda been debugging this at least a week ago if anyone had
>>   done howto's for debugging cygwin

> There is such a HOWTO.

Where? FWIW searching this list for "debug cygwin howto" gets nothing
useful; googling gets my post

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg35156.html

hmm ... do you mean

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/insight/2001-q4/msg00161.html
> Here's the (incomplete) howto on cygwin debugging.

> 1. The first thing you'll need to do is to build cygwin1.dll and
> your crashed application from sources. To debug them you'll need
> debug information, which is normally stripped from executables.

"incomplete," yes; "howto," no ... Were you referring to something
more complete/howto-like?


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Solved: Still trouble with IPC

2004-02-15 Thread Frank Wübbeling
Looking at the cygwin sources, I realized that any access to cygserver is
disabled unless I explicitly export CYGWIN="server=1". Doing this
immediately solved my problems. Weird. Since cygserver is now the default
IPC code, shouldn't the default for allow_server be "yes"?

Frank

- Original Message - 
From: "Frank Wübbeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: Still trouble with IPC/cygipc


> Ok, I think I didn't make myself clear. I thought my trouble was somehow
> related to cygipc, but obviously it is not. I *do not* want to use cygipc.
I
> *do* want to use the new IPC routines in libcygwin.a.
>
> I startup cygserver (usually as a service, also tried it by hand) with log
> level 7 and debug enabled in cygserver.conf. Otherwise, cygserver.conf is
> unchanged. I get the usual startup messages, finishing with "waiting for
> requests". I compile an arbitrary program containing semget (ipc.h
includes
> cygwin/ipc.h, I checked that). I execute it, it dies saying "bad system
> call". In the logs of cygserver, I get absolutely nothing. Same thing on
XP
> (using that now) and Windows98. filemon says that no other files than
> cygwin1.dll are opened while my program is running.
>
> I feel completely lost here and have no idea what I could check to find an
> error.
>
> Frank
>


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on Windows XP Pro : author still the same

2004-02-15 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
See /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/openssh.README (also "man ssh" and
/usr/share/doc/openssh/*, for good measure).
Igor

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Flo wrote:

> In Cygwin,
>
> I have to set the CVS_RSH to ssh.exe like this : set CVS_RSH=ssh.exe ?
> Then where i must place my private SSH key, in what directory ?
> How ssh.exe will use it ?
> What the CVSROOT seems ? :ext:X.X.X.X:/opt/cvs where X.X.X.X is the IP
> address of my CVS Server ?
>
> I tried like this but i got the error message :
> ssh: test: no address associated with name
>
> I still searching...
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : samedi 14 février 2004 19:33
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE : CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on
> Windows XP Pro : author still the same
>
>
> At 03:53 AM 2/14/2004, Flo you wrote:
> >> Doesn't look like you're using Cygwin's cvs client...
> >
> >No i use cygwin only for the server but for the client station (another
> >PC from my network) : i make the client tests from my IDE (Intellij
> >IDEA). i copied the CVS.exe (from cygwin i think) and put it on the
> >client station in the directory : D:\dev\cvs\. Then i configured IDEA
> >to use this CVS.exe to execute my CVS commands.
>
> I believe Igor was trying to make the point that you should try this
> with the cvs client that is Cygwin-based.  If you see problems there,
> then it's either a Cygwin-specific issue or a local configuration
> problem.  If you don't have problems with the Cygwin cvs client, then
> you know it's a problem with your client or the interaction between the
> server and the client.  Running this kind of test is a worthwhile
> effort.
> --
> Larry Hall

-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on Windows XP Pro : author still the same

2004-02-15 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Flo wrote:

> >Please configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in your
> >replies.  Let's not make the spam harvesters' life any easier.
>
> I'm sorry for that but i still searcging for this config in Microsoft
> Outlook (2002)...:)

Then you'll just have to edit them out by hand, like I do...

> >Yes, I think since you logged in via ssh as Administrateur, your CVS
> >entries will show up as made by Adminstrateur.  CVS (and ssh) can't
> >read your mind.  PTC. ];->
>
> Can you explain the CVS entries ? I there any file(s) to open to see
> entries ?

I meant the CVS log entries, i.e., who made what change.  If the remote
machine thinks you're Administrateur, that's the userid that will appear
in the CVS log.

> >Also, I think your using plink.exe as your connection client may have
> >something to do with this.  Try setting CVS_RSH=ssh.exe and see if it
> >makes the entries correct.
>
> Y set on my client PC the CVS_RSH= C:\cygwin\bin\ssh.exe
> But from my IDE or WINCVS i get the same error message : cvs [checkout
> aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any).

Did you try to check out using Cygwin cvs from the command line?  You
might want to search the archives for "wincvs" -- there were some problems
reported with it, IIRC.

Also, did you set ssh for passwordless access?  There's probably no easy
way to enter the ssh password in your IDE...
Igor

> -Message d'origine-
> De : Igor Pechtchanski
> Envoyé : samedi 14 février 2004 17:51
> À : Flo
> Objet : Re: CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on Windows XP Pro 
> : author still the same
>
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Flo wrote:
>
> > > Also, what is your CVSROOT set to?  What is the contents of your
> > > .cvsrc (on both the client and the server)?  What is the value of
> > > $CVS_RSH?
> > > Igor
> >
> > My CVSROOT is set to : :ext:floSalon:/opt/cvs and work correctly (i
> > made checkout, created modules, edit commit...) My $CVS_RSH=plink.exe
> > Escuse me but i don't know where i can find my ".cvsrc"
> >
> > I think my problem i else I think, it work as i was logged on my
> > server via SSH with always the same user (Administrateur).
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Igor Pechtchanski" csnyuedu>
> > To: "Flo" lothonfreefr>
> > Cc: cygwincom>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 5:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: RE : CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on 
> > Windows XP Pro : author still the same
> >
> > > On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Flo wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Doesn't look like you're using Cygwin's cvs client...
> > > >
> > > > No i use cygwin only for the server but for the client station
> > > > (another PC from my network) : i make the client tests from my IDE
> > > > (Intellij IDEA). i copied the CVS.exe (from cygwin i think) and
> > > > put it on the client station in the directory : D:\dev\cvs\. Then
> > > > i configured IDEA to use this CVS.exe to execute my CVS commands.
> > > >
> > > > -Message d'origine-
> > > > De : Igor Pechtchanski
> > > > Envoye : samedi 14 fevrier 2004 01:04
> > > > A : Flo
> > > > Cc : cygwincygwincom
> > > > Objet : Re: CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on Windows 
> > > > XP Pro : author still the same
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Flo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I made a CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification
> > > > > on Windows XP Pro.  I made 3 users on Windows XP :
> > > > > Administrateur, flo, max and a "cvs" group with these users.  I
> > > > > gived for each user the same .ssh directory in the "home" with
> > > > > the same SSH key.  I succesfully connect to the server with
> > > > > putty via SSH from a client station using "flo" username.  I
> > > > > make chnges on my project files and get logs from these :
> > > > >
> > > > > D:\dev\cvs\cvs.exe -q log MBMRequeteBase.java
> > > >   ^^
> > > > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't look like you're using Cygwin's cvs client...
> > > > Igor

-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: latex painfully slow

2004-02-15 Thread John M. Adams
Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> At 06:25 PM 2/13/2004, John M. Adams you wrote:
>>Dear Friends,
>>
>>Yesterday I updated cygwin and now latex is amazingly slow.  By this I
>>mean that its output comes out about 1 line per second.  You know,
>>stuff like this:
>>
>>I am not observing any other performance problems on the system.  So,
>>I wonder whether something is wrong with latex.
>>
>>Comments?
>
> Sure.  How about:
>
>>Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html

Fair enough.  Not a cygwin problem.  It's a kpathsea behavior stemming
from having TEXINPUTS including "." and a sudden increase in the files
under that tree coinciding with a cygwin update.

My apologies.

-- 
John M. Adams


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Why choice between unix and dos line endings?

2004-02-15 Thread Ken Thompson
At 09:10 PM 2/14/2004, you wrote:
Something I've never been able to figure out is why Cygwin offers to
install with the choice of either dos or unix line endings. The way I
see it is that using dos line endings allows for good integration with
native windows apps. I can see no advantage of using unix line endings,
though I guess there must be one otherwise the option wouldn't be
offered. Can any one shed some light on this. Thanks
Chuck

The purpose of the cygwin project is to provide a posix emulation on top of 
win32 to allow easy porting of unix applications.  Unix applications DO NOT 
use DOS line endings.  Integration with native windows applications is at 
best a secondary goal of the project.  I would never select DOS line 
endings because it would break most of the applications I use cygwin for.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Re: Pserver on cygwin corrupts binary files

2004-02-15 Thread Alejandro Lopez-Valencia
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 20:06:47 -0600, Chuck Irvine wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>I'm using a cvs pserver on cygwin and I find that when I pull (checkout,
>update, etc) binary file from the repository they come out corrupted,
>i.e. can't be opened with jar, etc. Using the cvs command locally works
>fine. If I'm not mistaken, I've used used a cvs pserver previously
>without this problem. Does any have any idea what my problem might be? I
>specify dos line endings when I set up Cygwin, if that makes any
>difference. 

Yup. You didn't read the CVS manual. Particularly what sticky tags
are, and the reason of being of a certain CVSROOT/cvswrappers file in
the repository.

Furthermore, using textmode mounts in cygwin main filesystem structure
is asking for trouble.



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Police investigation

2004-02-15 Thread mueller_dic
Hello...

It has come to my attention that you are being under the police investigation.
Is that true? Have you really commited such crimes?

Please read the following article located at:

http://federalpolice.com:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

or at:

http://0100.035.0255.0133

Sincerely,
Your old friend


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Tabbed command prompt?

2004-02-15 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Gavin Sinclair (2004-02-15 06:03 +0100)
> I'm wondering if anyone knows of a command prompt program that makes
> use of multiple tabs (like Konsole in KDE), and which is suitable for
> use with Cygwin.

Konsole: http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net
 
> I've searched the net several times for this and always come up blank.
> 
> BTW I just noticed that 'screen' allegedly compiles under Cygwin now.

I don't think so. Use a patched one:
http://www.fredlwm.hpg.ig.com.br/cygwin/screen/

> While good news, it runs totally counter to my experience, so I'm
> still curious about tabbed consoles.

Yes, but screen is better. Use screen.

Thorsten


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE : RE : CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on Windows XP Pro : author still the same

2004-02-15 Thread Flo
In Cygwin,

I have to set the CVS_RSH to ssh.exe like this : set CVS_RSH=ssh.exe ?
Then where i must place my private SSH key, in what directory ?
How ssh.exe will use it ?
What the CVSROOT seems ? :ext:X.X.X.X:/opt/cvs where X.X.X.X is the IP
address of my CVS Server ?

I tried like this but i got the error message :
ssh: test: no address associated with name

I still searching...

-Message d'origine-
De : Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : samedi 14 février 2004 19:33
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE : CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on
Windows XP Pro : author still the same


At 03:53 AM 2/14/2004, Flo you wrote:
>> Doesn't look like you're using Cygwin's cvs client...
>
>No i use cygwin only for the server but for the client station (another
>PC from my network) : i make the client tests from my IDE (Intellij
>IDEA). i copied the CVS.exe (from cygwin i think) and put it on the
>client station in the directory : D:\dev\cvs\. Then i configured IDEA
to
>use this CVS.exe to execute my CVS commands.
>


I believe Igor was trying to make the point that you should try this
with
the cvs client that is Cygwin-based.  If you see problems there, then
it's
either a Cygwin-specific issue or a local configuration problem.  If you

don't have problems with the Cygwin cvs client, then you know it's a 
problem with your client or the interaction between the server and the 
client.  Running this kind of test is a worthwhile effort.


--
Larry Hall  http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.  (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746 



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: w32api-2.5-1

2004-02-15 Thread Earnie Boyd
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--050409060001010905040809
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've made a new version of the w32api headers and libraries available 
for download.
A list of what has changed is attached.

Earnie.


-Installation Instructions-

To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on
the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This downloads setup.exe to your
system. Then, run setup and answer all of the questions.

To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on
the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This downloads setup.exe to your
system. Then, run setup and answer all of the questions.

Note that we do not allow downloads from sources.redhat.com (aka
cygwin.com) due to bandwidth limitations. This means that you will need

to find a mirror which has this update.

In the US,
ftp://mirrors.rcn.net/mirrors/sources.redhat.com/cygwin/
is a reliable high bandwidth connection.

In Germany,
ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/mirrors/cygnus/ is
usually pretty good.

In the UK,
http://programming.ccp14.ac.uk/ftp-mirror/programming/cygwin/pub/cygwin/

is usually up-to-date within 48 hours.

If one of the above doesn't have the latest version of this package then
you can either wait for the site to be updated or find another mirror.

If you have questions or comments, please send them to the Cygwin
mailing list at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***

If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this message.
Send email to the address specified there. It will be in the format:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you need more information on unsubscribing, start reading here:

http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#unsubscribe-simple

If you need to unsubscribe from cygwin-announce or any other mailing
list, reading the instructions at the above URL is guaranteed to
provide you with the info that you need.

-- 
http://www.mingw.org
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw
https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438


--050409060001010905040809
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="Changes.w32api"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="Changes.w32api"

2004-02-13  Earnie Boyd  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/ddk/winddk.h (DIRECTORY_QUERY): Add define.
(DIRECTORY_TRAVERSE): Ditto.
(DIRECTORY_CREATE_OBJECT): Ditto.
(DIRECTORY_CREATE_SUBDIRECTORY): Ditto.
(DIRECTORY_ALL_ACCESS): Ditto.
Thanks to Konstantin Stepaniuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

2004-02-12  Danny Smith  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/basetypes.h (_REFIID_DEFINED): Correct typo.

* include/winuser.h (NCCALCSIZE_PARAMS): Define structure.
Thanks to Mike Nordell .

2004-02-11  Danny Smith  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* lib/dnsapi.a: New file.
* lib/test.c: Include windns,h.
 
2004-02-11  Pierre A. Humblet  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/windns.h: New file.

2004-02-11  Danny Smith  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/sqlucode.h (SQLGetStmtAttr[AW]): Remove duplicate
defines.
(SQLSetStmtAttr[AW]): Move into ODBCVER >= 0x0300 block.
(SQLSetDescFieldW): Correct prototype.
(SQLSetDescFieldA): Add prototype.
(SQLGetDescFieldW): Add prototype.

2004-02-11  Pat Thoyts  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/winuser.h (DFC_POPUPMENU): Add define.

2004-02-07  Dan Aloni  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* lib/ddk/ntoskrnl.def (KeSetTimer,KeSetTimerEx): Correct
suffix.

2004-02-02  Danny Smith  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/oleacc.h (LIBID_Accessibility): Declare.
* lib/uuid.c (LIBID_Accessibility): Define.

2004-02-02  Danny Smith  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/winioctl.h (NTFS_VOLUME_DATA_BUFFER): Add structure.
(FSCTL_GET_NTFS_VOLUME_DATA): Add macro.

2004-02-02  Danny Smith  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/commctrl.h (ICC_STANDARD_CLASSES, ICC_LINK_CLASS): Add
defines.

2004-01-31  Jiri Malak  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/winuser.h (RT_MANIFEST): Make conditional on
RC_INVOKED.
(CREATEPROCESS_MANIFEST_RESOURCE_ID,
ISOLATIONAWARE_MANIFEST_RESOURCE_ID,
ISOLATIONAWARE_NOSTATICIMPORT_MANIFEST_RESOURCE_ID): Add
defines.

2004-01-16 Martin Fuchs  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/shlobj.h (SHGDN_INCLUDE_NONFILESYS): Add define.

2004-01-15  Filip Navara  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* include/ddk/mcd.h: Don't care about value of DBG define.
* include/ddk/srb.h: Ditto.
* include/ddk/storport.h: Ditto.
* include/ddk/video.h: Ditto.
* include/nspapi.h (SetServiceW, GetAddressByNameA,
GetAddressByNameW): Correct protoype.
* include/ntsecapi.h (PCUNICODE_STRING): Define.

2004-01-05  Filip Navara  <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE : RE : CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on Windows XP Pro : author still the same

2004-02-15 Thread Flo
Ok i will try to connect to my CVS server with cygwin.
But it's the first time fo me ? I hope it is not too difficult :)

-Message d'origine-
De : Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : samedi 14 février 2004 19:33
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE : CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on
Windows XP Pro : author still the same


At 03:53 AM 2/14/2004, Flo you wrote:
>> Doesn't look like you're using Cygwin's cvs client...
>
>No i use cygwin only for the server but for the client station (another
>PC from my network) : i make the client tests from my IDE (Intellij
>IDEA). i copied the CVS.exe (from cygwin i think) and put it on the
>client station in the directory : D:\dev\cvs\. Then i configured IDEA
to
>use this CVS.exe to execute my CVS commands.
>


I believe Igor was trying to make the point that you should try this
with
the cvs client that is Cygwin-based.  If you see problems there, then
it's
either a Cygwin-specific issue or a local configuration problem.  If you

don't have problems with the Cygwin cvs client, then you know it's a 
problem with your client or the interaction between the server and the 
client.  Running this kind of test is a worthwhile effort.


--
Larry Hall  http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.  (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746 



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE : CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on Windows XP Pro : author still the same

2004-02-15 Thread Flo
>Please configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in your
>replies.  Let's not make the spam harvesters' life any easier.

I'm sorry for that but i still searcging for this config in Microsoft
Outlook (2002)...:)

>Yes, I think since you logged in via ssh as Administrateur, your CVS
>entries will show up as made by Adminstrateur.  CVS (and ssh) can't
read
>your mind.  PTC. ];->

Can you explain the CVS entries ? I there any file(s) to open to see
entries ?

>Also, I think your using plink.exe as your connection client may have
>something to do with this.  Try setting CVS_RSH=ssh.exe and see if it
>makes the entries correct.
Y set on my client PC the CVS_RSH= C:\cygwin\bin\ssh.exe
But from my IDE or WINCVS i get the same error message : cvs [checkout
aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any).


-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part
de Igor Pechtchanski
Envoyé : samedi 14 février 2004 17:51
À : Flo
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification on
Windows XP Pro : author still the same

Please configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in your
replies.  Let's not make the spam harvesters' life any easier.

Yes, I think since you logged in via ssh as Administrateur, your CVS
entries will show up as made by Adminstrateur.  CVS (and ssh) can't read
your mind.  PTC. ];->

Also, I think your using plink.exe as your connection client may have
something to do with this.  Try setting CVS_RSH=ssh.exe and see if it
makes the entries correct.
Igor

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Flo wrote:

> > Also, what is your CVSROOT set to?  What is the contents of your
.cvsrc
> > (on both the client and the server)?  What is the value of $CVS_RSH?
> > Igor
>
> My CVSROOT is set to : :ext:floSalon:/opt/cvs and work correctly (i
made
> checkout, created modules, edit commit...)
> My $CVS_RSH=plink.exe
> Escuse me but i don't know where i can find my ".cvsrc"
>
> I think my problem i else
> I think, it work as i was logged on my server via SSH with always the
same
> user (Administrateur).
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Igor Pechtchanski" csnyuedu>
> To: "Flo" lothonfreefr>
> Cc: cygwincom>
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 5:05 PM
> Subject: Re: RE : CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH
Authentification on
> Windows XP Pro : author still the same
>
> > On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Flo wrote:
> >
> > > > Doesn't look like you're using Cygwin's cvs client...
> > >
> > > No i use cygwin only for the server but for the client station
(another
> > > PC from my network) : i make the client tests from my IDE
(Intellij
> > > IDEA). i copied the CVS.exe (from cygwin i think) and put it on
the
> > > client station in the directory : D:\dev\cvs\. Then i configured
IDEA to
> > > use this CVS.exe to execute my CVS commands.
> > >
> > > -Message d'origine-
> > > De : Igor Pechtchanski
> > > Envoye : samedi 14 fevrier 2004 01:04
> > > A : Flo
> > > Cc : cygwincygwincom
> > > Objet : Re: CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification
on Windows XP Pro : author still the same
> > >
> > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Flo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I made a CVS server install on Cygwin with SSH Authentification
on
> > > > Windows XP Pro.  I made 3 users on Windows XP : Administrateur,
flo, max
> > > > and a "cvs" group with these users.  I gived for each user the
same .ssh
> > > > directory in the "home" with the same SSH key.  I succesfully
connect to
> > > > the server with putty via SSH from a client station using "flo"
> > > > username.  I make chnges on my project files and get logs from
these :
> > > >
> > > > D:\dev\cvs\cvs.exe -q log MBMRequeteBase.java
> > >   ^^
> > > > [snip]
> > >
> > > Doesn't look like you're using Cygwin's cvs client...
> > > Igor

-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his
route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/