RE: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Does lsof exist for cygwin? He could use that to find what is using that address. -Original Message- From: Alexander Gottwald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 21 juni 2004 13:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, aroushdi wrote: Hi Alex , it gives Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 (Address already in use) Normally this just means there is already a program using this address. I'm not sure if this applies to your case too or if this is an error in the cygwin layer. I'm sorry to say this, but you are on your own with this. I have no clue how to trace this down without being able to reproduce the bug. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723 === This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. You are explicitly requested to notify the sender of this email that the intended recipient was not reached.
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, aroushdi wrote: Fatal server error: Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 Hi Alex I tried to mount a /tmp for each Xwin session still no luck cannot bind the session thks for ur help I've built a binary which should include a more detailed errormessage in the fialed to bind message. Get it from http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/XWin.exe.bz2 and send me the output if it contains the failed to bind mesage. bye ago Hi Alex , it gives Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 (Address already in use) ihave used different :nn different one with :5 and one :10 with diferrent hosts . tried also without the from parm i get not get the CDE screen just gray one . thanks for ur help . SECOND BAD === xwin :10 -query iccpart3 -from icc68651 _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root Fatal server error: Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 (Address already in use) winDeinitMultiWindowWM - Noting shutdown in progress [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ FIRST GOOD == $ xwin :5 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 Welcome to the XWin X Server Vendor: The Cygwin/X Project Release: 6.7.0.0-1 Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XWin was started with the following command line: xwin :5 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root winValidateArgs - g_iNumScreens: 1 iMaxConsecutiveScreen: 1 (II) XF86Config is not supported (II) See http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html for more information winDetectSupportedEngines - Windows NT/2000/XP winDetectSupportedEngines - DirectDraw installed winDetectSupportedEngines - DirectDraw4 installed winDetectSupportedEngines - Returning, supported engines 0007 winSetEngine - Using Shadow DirectDraw NonLocking winAdjustVideoModeShadowDDNL - Using Windows display depth of 32 bits per pixel winFinishScreenInitFB - Masks: 00ff ff00 00ff MIT-SHM extension disabled due to lack of kernel support XFree86-Bigfont extension local-client optimization disabled due to lack of shar ed memory support in the kernel (--) Setting autorepeat to delay=500, rate=31 (--) winConfigKeyboard - Layout: 0409 (0409) (EE) Keyboardlayout US (0409) is unknown Rules = xorg Model = pc101 Layout = us Variant = (null) Options = (null ) Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/, removing from li st! Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from li st! winPointerWarpCursor - Discarding first warp: 636 468 winProcEstablishConnection - Hello winProcEstablishConnection - Clipboard is not enabled, returning.
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, aroushdi wrote: Hi Alex , it gives Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 (Address already in use) Normally this just means there is already a program using this address. I'm not sure if this applies to your case too or if this is an error in the cygwin layer. I'm sorry to say this, but you are on your own with this. I have no clue how to trace this down without being able to reproduce the bug. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, aroushdi wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: Fatal server error: Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 I've build a small test program which will query the interface address which xwin tries to bind to. get it from http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/gethostbyname.tar.gz unpack it, run ./gethostbyname icc68651 and report the output. bye ago NP: [:SITD:] - Laughingstock (No Compromise Remix) Hi Alex , Please find below the output of gethostbyname. Sorry to respond a little bit late but I was on vacation . $ gethostbyname icc68651 hostname: icc68651 address: 199.1.100.60 address: 192.168.37.1 address: 192.168.124.1 By the way i have downloaded the XFREE86 package and I have the same problem on the second XWIN . This installation was done on a plain machine . I guess it is a CYGWIN change that triggered this behaviour. How can we proceed . The unable to bind message is quite hard to track down. I'll try to add a more descriptive message which will hopefully reveal what the cause of the problem is. But this may take some days since I'm quite busy these days. bye ago Hi Alex I tried to mount a /tmp for each Xwin session still no luck cannot bind the session thks for ur help amr
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: Fatal server error: Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 I've build a small test program which will query the interface address which xwin tries to bind to. get it from http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/gethostbyname.tar.gz unpack it, run ./gethostbyname icc68651 and report the output. bye ago NP: [:SITD:] - Laughingstock (No Compromise Remix) Hi Alex , Please find below the output of gethostbyname. Sorry to respond a little bit late but I was on vacation . $ gethostbyname icc68651 hostname: icc68651 address: 199.1.100.60 address: 192.168.37.1 address: 192.168.124.1 By the way i have downloaded the XFREE86 package and I have the same problem on the second XWIN . This installation was done on a plain machine . I guess it is a CYGWIN change that triggered this behaviour. How can we proceed . THanks for ur help bye amr
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, aroushdi wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: Fatal server error: Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 I've build a small test program which will query the interface address which xwin tries to bind to. get it from http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/gethostbyname.tar.gz unpack it, run ./gethostbyname icc68651 and report the output. bye ago NP: [:SITD:] - Laughingstock (No Compromise Remix) Hi Alex , Please find below the output of gethostbyname. Sorry to respond a little bit late but I was on vacation . $ gethostbyname icc68651 hostname: icc68651 address: 199.1.100.60 address: 192.168.37.1 address: 192.168.124.1 By the way i have downloaded the XFREE86 package and I have the same problem on the second XWIN . This installation was done on a plain machine . I guess it is a CYGWIN change that triggered this behaviour. How can we proceed . The unable to bind message is quite hard to track down. I'll try to add a more descriptive message which will hopefully reveal what the cause of the problem is. But this may take some days since I'm quite busy these days. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: Alex thank u for looking into it . Can u look up in the thread Xwin and multiple users . May be because I am using the same /tmp for each user . ?? Have you tried the testprogram I sent last weekend? ! I've build a small test program which will query the interface address ! which xwin tries to bind to. ! ! get it from http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/gethostbyname.tar.gz ! unpack it, run ./gethostbyname icc68651 and report the output. bye ago NP: Suicide Commando - Never Get Out Hi Alex , Please find below the output of gethostbyname. Sorry to respond a little bit late but I was on vacation . $ gethostbyname icc68651 hostname: icc68651 address: 199.1.100.60 address: 192.168.37.1 address: 192.168.124.1 bye amr
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: I am attaching a file of the old version which works u have 2 sessions running at the same time may be of some help . I'm quite stuck. I've no idea why it fails. If I find a solution or have some other things to try I'll let you know. bye ago Alex thank u for looking into it . Can u look up in the thread Xwin and multiple users . May be because I am using the same /tmp for each user . ?? thanks again amr
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
aroushdi wrote: Fatal server error: Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 I've build a small test program which will query the interface address which xwin tries to bind to. get it from http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/gethostbyname.tar.gz unpack it, run ./gethostbyname icc68651 and report the output. bye ago NP: [:SITD:] - Laughingstock (No Compromise Remix) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
aroushdi wrote: I am attaching a file of the old version which works u have 2 sessions running at the same time may be of some help . I'm quite stuck. I've no idea why it fails. If I find a solution or have some other things to try I'll let you know. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: how is /tmp mounted? With the mount command I realized that /tmp was mounted on \documents and settings . This is a new change . I've a small test program which prints the installed network devices. http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/ls_netdev.tar.gz Please run it and report its output. bye ago NP: Pulcher Femina - Dark Clouds I am attaching file containing the information u need .I have added to it netstat -a results the Xwin.log which is running till now and then another Xwin.log which overwrote the old one and of course produced the same error ( unable to bind ) thank u again amr $ ls_netdev ls_netdev $Id: ls_netdev.c,v 1.6 2002/11/10 16:14:32 ago Exp $ OS Version: Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Querying devices using ioctl lo: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=127.0.0.1 eth0: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=192.168.80.1 eth1: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=192.168.226.1 eth2: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=199.1.100.60 lo: metric=1 mtu=1500 eth0: metric=1 mtu=1500 eth1: metric=1 mtu=1500 eth2: metric=1 mtu=1415 Querying devices using internal function PMIB_IPADDRROW[0x22e274] dwAddr=017f //127.0.0.1 dwIndex=1 dwMask=00ff //255.0.0.0 dwBCastAddr=0001 dwReasmSize=65535 PMIB_IFROW[0x22e3d0] wszName= dwIndex=1 dwType=24 bDescr=MS TCP Loopback interface PMIB_IPADDRROW[0x22e28c] dwAddr=0150a8c0 //192.168.80.1 dwIndex=3 dwMask=00ff //255.255.255.0 dwBCastAddr=0001 dwReasmSize=65535 PMIB_IFROW[0x22e3d0] wszName= dwIndex=3 dwType=6 bDescr=VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter PMIB_IPADDRROW[0x22e2a4] dwAddr=01e2a8c0 //192.168.226.1 dwIndex=2 dwMask=00ff //255.255.255.0 dwBCastAddr=0001 dwReasmSize=65535 PMIB_IFROW[0x22e3d0] wszName= dwIndex=2 dwType=6 bDescr=VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter PMIB_IPADDRROW[0x22e2bc] dwAddr=3c6401c7 //199.1.100.60 dwIndex=16777221 dwMask=00ff //255.255.255.0 dwBCastAddr=0001 dwReasmSize=65535 PMIB_IFROW[0x22e3d0] wszName= dwIndex=16777221 dwType=6 bDescr=Intel 82558-based Integrated Ethernet with Wake on LAN lo: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=127.0.0.1 eth0: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=192.168.80.1 eth1: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=192.168.226.1 eth2: family=TCP/IP (0) addr=199.1.100.60 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ netstat -a Active Connections Proto Local Address Foreign AddressState TCPicc68651:epmap :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:microsoft-ds :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:523 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1025 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1027 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1077 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1292 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1295 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:2099 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3458 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:4043 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:6030 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:6789 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:38292 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:db2c_DB2 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1035 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1142 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1149 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1291 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1585 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1598 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1669 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:2543 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:2763 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3164 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3367 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3456 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3456 icc68651:3458 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:3457 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3458 icc68651:3456 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:3552 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3572 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3714 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3735 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:4088 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:4154 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:4200 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:4230 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:4276 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:4347 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:4449 :0 LISTENING TCP
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Mon, 17 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: how is /tmp mounted? With the mount command I realized that /tmp was mounted on \documents and settings . This is a new change . I've a small test program which prints the installed network devices. http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/ls_netdev.tar.gz Hm. It reported 3 network adapters. 1 real and two pseudo (loopback and vmware) maybe this causes the problem. Xwin :30 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 -fp tcp/iccpart1:7100 -once Have you already tried using the ip adress instead of the hostname. eg Xwin :30 -query iccpart2 -from 199.1.100.60 -fp tcp/iccpart1:7100 -once I am attaching file containing the information u need .I have added to it netstat -a results the Xwin.log which is running till now and then another Xwin.log which overwrote the old one and of course produced the same error ( unable to bind ) thank u again bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Mon, 17 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: how is /tmp mounted? With the mount command I realized that /tmp was mounted on \documents and settings . This is a new change . I've a small test program which prints the installed network devices. http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/ls_netdev.tar.gz Hm. It reported 3 network adapters. 1 real and two pseudo (loopback and vmware) maybe this causes the problem. Xwin :30 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 -fp tcp/iccpart1:7100 -once Have you already tried using the ip adress instead of the hostname. eg Xwin :30 -query iccpart2 -from 199.1.100.60 -fp tcp/iccpart1:7100 -once I am attaching file containing the information u need .I have added to it netstat -a results the Xwin.log which is running till now and then another Xwin.log which overwrote the old one and of course produced the same error ( unable to bind ) thank u again bye ago Alex one more thing which might help the second session aquires a lock in /tmp/.X11-unix . It has tb cleaned manually to free this port thks n by
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Mon, 17 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: aroushdi wrote: how is /tmp mounted? With the mount command I realized that /tmp was mounted on \documents and settings . This is a new change . I've a small test program which prints the installed network devices. http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/ls_netdev.tar.gz Hm. It reported 3 network adapters. 1 real and two pseudo (loopback and vmware) maybe this causes the problem. Xwin :30 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 -fp tcp/iccpart1:7100 -once Have you already tried using the ip adress instead of the hostname. eg Xwin :30 -query iccpart2 -from 199.1.100.60 -fp tcp/iccpart1:7100 -once I am attaching file containing the information u need .I have added to it netstat -a results the Xwin.log which is running till now and then another Xwin.log which overwrote the old one and of course produced the same error ( unable to bind ) thank u again bye ago I am attaching a file of the old version which works u have 2 sessions running at the same time may be of some help . thks C:\Documents and Settings\aroushdi.ICC68651netstat -a Active Connections Proto Local Address Foreign AddressState TCPicc68651:epmap :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:microsoft-ds :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:523 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1025 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1026 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1027 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1046 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1760 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:6020 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:6030 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:6789 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:38292 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:db2c_DB2 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1044 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1754 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3041 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:3043 :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:netbios-ssn :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:netbios-ssn :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:netbios-ssn :0 LISTENING TCPicc68651:1046 iccpart1:7100 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:1760 iccpart1:7100 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:6020 billb.ICSI.Net:37350 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:6020 iccp6502:37349 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:6020 iccp6502:37353 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:6030 iccpart2:32984 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:6030 iccpart2:32985 ESTABLISHED TCPicc68651:6030 iccpart2:32988 ESTABLISHED UDPicc68651:microsoft-ds *:* UDPicc68651:523 *:* UDPicc68651:38037 *:* UDPicc68651:netbios-ns*:* UDPicc68651:netbios-dgm *:* UDPicc68651:netbios-ns*:* UDPicc68651:netbios-dgm *:* UDPicc68651:netbios-ns*:* UDPicc68651:netbios-dgm *:* UDPicc68651:1045 *:* UDPicc68651:1757 *:* C:\Documents and Settings\aroushdi.ICC68651ip config /all 'ip' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\Documents and Settings\aroushdi.ICC68651ipconfig /all Windows 2000 IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : icc68651 Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel 82558-based Integrated Etherne t with Wake on LAN Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-90-27-31-B1-66 DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 199.1.100.60 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 199.1.100.240 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 194.2.0.20 194.2.0.50 Ethernet adapter VMware Network Adapter VMnet1: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for VMnet1 Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-56-C0-00-01 DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.37.1 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : DNS Servers .
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
aroushdi wrote: Alex , I have deinstalled the old cygwin , updated my distro and installed from scratch i tried it as is and with the firewall stopped . the results are the same and the errors are the same . I am attaching the inmage of the error . Another thing i see any Xwin.log in the \cygwin\ not in /tmp ?? how is /tmp mounted? you can show mounts with the mount command. $ xwin :30 -query iccpart3 -from icc68651 [2] 2084 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ Welcome to the XWin X Server Vendor: The Cygwin/X Project Release: 6.7.0.0-8 Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XWin was started with the following command line: xwin :30 -query iccpart3 -from icc68651 _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root Fatal server error: Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 winDeinitMultiWindowWM - Noting shutdown in progress == Good session $ xwin :2 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 [1] 2264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ Welcome to the XWin X Server Vendor: The Cygwin/X Project Release: 6.7.0.0-8 Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XWin was started with the following command line: xwin :2 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 winValidateArgs - g_iNumScreens: 1 iMaxConsecutiveScreen: 1 (II) XF86Config is not supported (II) See http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html for more information winDetectSupportedEngines - Windows NT/2000/XP winDetectSupportedEngines - DirectDraw installed winDetectSupportedEngines - DirectDraw4 installed winDetectSupportedEngines - Returning, supported engines 0007 winSetEngine - Using Shadow DirectDraw NonLocking winAdjustVideoModeShadowDDNL - Using Windows display depth of 32 bits per pixel winFinishScreenInitFB - Masks: 00ff ff00 00ff MIT-SHM extension disabled due to lack of kernel support XFree86-Bigfont extension local-client optimization disabled due to lack of shar ed memory support in the kernel (--) Setting autorepeat to delay=500, rate=31 (--) winConfigKeyboard - Layout: 0409 (0409) (EE) Keyboardlayout US (0409) is unknown Rules = xorg Model = pc101 Layout = us Variant = (null) Options = (null ) Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from li st! winPointerWarpCursor - Discarding first warp: 636 468 winProcEstablishConnection - Hello winProcEstablishConnection - Clipboard is not enabled, returning. Is there any other difference in starting the two session apart from the display number and the -query parameter? Is the success random or does if follow any pattern? I've a small test program which prints the installed network devices. http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~goal/xfree/ls_netdev.tar.gz Please run it and report its output. bye ago NP: Pulcher Femina - Dark Clouds -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Thu, 13 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: Alexander , thank u for ur quick reply I have used ur technique with and without -from , -fp , once and they all fail with unable to bind and no message in the logfile . I have produced the same errors on winXP and W2K . same thing . Old version 4.3 and 4.4 works fine no problem . is there a way to get a more diagnosting log . I suspect that there is a module locking some file which casses this error . The same error can be reproduced on V 4.3 4.4 if use the same port :X we get the same message faile to bind . Alex can u reproduce this problem no. If I start XWin twice with :1 I get winCheckDisplayNumber - Cygwin/X is already running on display 1 Fatal server error: InitOutput - Duplicate invocation on display number: 1. Exiting. Can you send the commandline which you used to start the xserver? What kind of network cards do you use? Do you have any kind of personal firewall or vpn software installed? bye ago Alex thank u for ur concerns , I use 2 PC's one IBM Intellistation standard with an INTEL 82556 based integrated adapter . The other a T40 thinkpad with INTEL PRO/1000 MT Mobile connected integrated also . the command line I use in the following sequence from a cygwin shell : Xwin :01 -query host1 -from myhost -once Xwin :02 -query host1 -from myhost -once the reult is the same if i opened 2 different cygwin shells or change the ports . I have ZoneLab Integrity client installed and all X programs are defined as trusted as well as our network which is trusted as well . I have also a ATT dialer 5.5.01 installed but not active ( Xwin kills the VPN connection after sometime completely random ) so i uses either but not the 2 in the same time Hope this will help in resolving my problem . thks
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Fri, 14 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: the command line I use in the following sequence from a cygwin shell : Xwin :01 -query host1 -from myhost -once Xwin :02 -query host1 -from myhost -once These lines work perfectly for me. the reult is the same if i opened 2 different cygwin shells or change the ports . I have ZoneLab Integrity client installed and all X programs are defined as trusted as well as our network which is trusted as well . Have you tried disabling the ZoneLab program? What message is printed _exactly_ when XWin fails? bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: the command line I use in the following sequence from a cygwin shell : Xwin :01 -query host1 -from myhost -once Xwin :02 -query host1 -from myhost -once These lines work perfectly for me. the reult is the same if i opened 2 different cygwin shells or change the ports . I have ZoneLab Integrity client installed and all X programs are defined as trusted as well as our network which is trusted as well . Have you tried disabling the ZoneLab program? What message is printed _exactly_ when XWin fails? bye ago Alex , I have deinstalled the old cygwin , updated my distro and installed from scratch i tried it as is and with the firewall stopped . the results are the same and the errors are the same . I am attaching the inmage of the error . Another thing i see any Xwin.log in the \cygwin\ not in /tmp ?? thks again for ur help Bad session $ xwin :30 -query iccpart3 -from icc68651 [2] 2084 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ Welcome to the XWin X Server Vendor: The Cygwin/X Project Release: 6.7.0.0-8 Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XWin was started with the following command line: xwin :30 -query iccpart3 -from icc68651 _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root Fatal server error: Xserver: failed to bind to -from address: icc68651 winDeinitMultiWindowWM - Noting shutdown in progress == Good session $ xwin :2 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 [1] 2264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ Welcome to the XWin X Server Vendor: The Cygwin/X Project Release: 6.7.0.0-8 Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XWin was started with the following command line: xwin :2 -query iccpart2 -from icc68651 winValidateArgs - g_iNumScreens: 1 iMaxConsecutiveScreen: 1 (II) XF86Config is not supported (II) See http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html for more information winDetectSupportedEngines - Windows NT/2000/XP winDetectSupportedEngines - DirectDraw installed winDetectSupportedEngines - DirectDraw4 installed winDetectSupportedEngines - Returning, supported engines 0007 winSetEngine - Using Shadow DirectDraw NonLocking winAdjustVideoModeShadowDDNL - Using Windows display depth of 32 bits per pixel winFinishScreenInitFB - Masks: 00ff ff00 00ff MIT-SHM extension disabled due to lack of kernel support XFree86-Bigfont extension local-client optimization disabled due to lack of shar ed memory support in the kernel (--) Setting autorepeat to delay=500, rate=31 (--) winConfigKeyboard - Layout: 0409 (0409) (EE) Keyboardlayout US (0409) is unknown Rules = xorg Model = pc101 Layout = us Variant = (null) Options = (null ) Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from li st! winPointerWarpCursor - Discarding first warp: 636 468 winProcEstablishConnection - Hello winProcEstablishConnection - Clipboard is not enabled, returning. === inline: xwinerr.gif
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: I am a little bit confused I see here that we have moved to Xorg distribution . I took a look at XFree.org and it seems they have Binaries for Cygwin till 4.4 . These binaries are likely to be very outdated. We moved to X.org because it was easier for Cygwin/X developers to get cvs access there. XFree only allowed cvs access for a few people from the core team. We had to ask them to include the changes into their cvs. As a result the XFree cvs was always a few weeks up to some months behind the Cygwin/X development. The cygwin part from XFree may now be about 7 or 8 months old. Many Before saying may be, it is proper to verify your statements. The 4.4 binaries are no older than the end of December. I did. The last change to the hw/xwin files was 4 months ago (according to wincvs) and those were only changes which were required because some macros changed. The last major patch for hw/xwin was applied by egbert on Wed Oct 8 10:13:03 2003 UTC (7 months ago) by eich bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: I am a little bit confused I see here that we have moved to Xorg distribution . I took a look at XFree.org and it seems they have Binaries for Cygwin till 4.4 . These binaries are likely to be very outdated. We moved to X.org because it was easier for Cygwin/X developers to get cvs access there. XFree only allowed cvs access for a few people from the core team. We had to ask them to include the changes into their cvs. As a result the XFree cvs was always a few weeks up to some months behind the Cygwin/X development. The cygwin part from XFree may now be about 7 or 8 months old. Many Before saying may be, it is proper to verify your statements. The 4.4 binaries are no older than the end of December. So they are old. Who cares? Equally, I might point out that (until the recent bulk import), much of cygwin's build tree outside the small area of the Xwin server was several months old. They were based on the XFree 4.3 release. But the hw/xwin part was and still is being extended with a lot of features and 6 months make a big difference between a broken and a much better clipboard integration. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Alexander Gottwald wrote: They were based on the XFree 4.3 release. But the hw/xwin part was and still is being extended with a lot of features and 6 months make a big difference between a broken and a much better clipboard integration. particularly when most of the work was done in the past three months. (the related code in mid-December was, if you may choose to recall, broken). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
aroushdi wrote: Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: I am a little bit confused I see here that we have moved to Xorg distribution . I took a look at XFree.org and it seems they have Binaries for Cygwin till 4.4 . These binaries are likely to be very outdated. We moved to X.org because it was easier for Cygwin/X developers to get cvs access there. XFree only allowed cvs access for a few people from the core team. We had to ask them to include the changes into their cvs. As a result the XFree cvs was always a few weeks up to some months behind the Cygwin/X development. The cygwin part from XFree may now be about 7 or 8 months old. Many improvements (eg for multiwindow mode or clipboard support) have not been included into the XFree cvs. My question is Xfree going to be abandoned in favor of Xorg . What is the relation between the 2 . The reason I am asking because since the move to Xorg binaries i cannot have more than one Xsession at a time . You can start the first Xserver as usual XWin [options] and the second with XWin :1 [options] the third with XWin :2 [options] and so on This results in display names :0.0, :1.0, :2.0 ... bye ago Alexander , thank u for ur quick reply I have used ur technique with and without -from , -fp , once and they all fail with unable to bind and no message in the logfile . I have produced the same errors on winXP and W2K . same thing . Old version 4.3 and 4.4 works fine no problem . is there a way to get a more diagnosting log . I suspect that there is a module locking some file which casses this error . The same error can be reproduced on V 4.3 4.4 if use the same port :X we get the same message faile to bind . thks for ur help Alex can u reproduce this problem thks
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Thu, 13 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: Alexander , thank u for ur quick reply I have used ur technique with and without -from , -fp , once and they all fail with unable to bind and no message in the logfile . I have produced the same errors on winXP and W2K . same thing . Old version 4.3 and 4.4 works fine no problem . is there a way to get a more diagnosting log . I suspect that there is a module locking some file which casses this error . The same error can be reproduced on V 4.3 4.4 if use the same port :X we get the same message faile to bind . Alex can u reproduce this problem no. If I start XWin twice with :1 I get winCheckDisplayNumber - Cygwin/X is already running on display 1 Fatal server error: InitOutput - Duplicate invocation on display number: 1. Exiting. Can you send the commandline which you used to start the xserver? What kind of network cards do you use? Do you have any kind of personal firewall or vpn software installed? bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
I am a little bit confused I see here that we have moved to Xorg distribution . I took a look at XFree.org and it seems they have Binaries for Cygwin till 4.4 . My question is Xfree going to be abandoned in favor of Xorg . What is the relation between the 2 . The reason I am asking because since the move to Xorg binaries i cannot have more than one Xsession at a time . thks n rgds
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Wed, 12 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: I am a little bit confused I see here that we have moved to Xorg distribution . I took a look at XFree.org and it seems they have Binaries for Cygwin till 4.4 . These binaries are likely to be very outdated. We moved to X.org because it was easier for Cygwin/X developers to get cvs access there. XFree only allowed cvs access for a few people from the core team. We had to ask them to include the changes into their cvs. As a result the XFree cvs was always a few weeks up to some months behind the Cygwin/X development. The cygwin part from XFree may now be about 7 or 8 months old. Many improvements (eg for multiwindow mode or clipboard support) have not been included into the XFree cvs. My question is Xfree going to be abandoned in favor of Xorg . What is the relation between the 2 . The reason I am asking because since the move to Xorg binaries i cannot have more than one Xsession at a time . You can start the first Xserver as usual XWin [options] and the second with XWin :1 [options] the third with XWin :2 [options] and so on This results in display names :0.0, :1.0, :2.0 ... bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: I am a little bit confused I see here that we have moved to Xorg distribution . I took a look at XFree.org and it seems they have Binaries for Cygwin till 4.4 . These binaries are likely to be very outdated. We moved to X.org because it was easier for Cygwin/X developers to get cvs access there. XFree only allowed cvs access for a few people from the core team. We had to ask them to include the changes into their cvs. As a result the XFree cvs was always a few weeks up to some months behind the Cygwin/X development. The cygwin part from XFree may now be about 7 or 8 months old. Many Before saying may be, it is proper to verify your statements. The 4.4 binaries are no older than the end of December. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: I am a little bit confused I see here that we have moved to Xorg distribution . I took a look at XFree.org and it seems they have Binaries for Cygwin till 4.4 . These binaries are likely to be very outdated. We moved to X.org because it was easier for Cygwin/X developers to get cvs access there. XFree only allowed cvs access for a few people from the core team. We had to ask them to include the changes into their cvs. As a result the XFree cvs was always a few weeks up to some months behind the Cygwin/X development. The cygwin part from XFree may now be about 7 or 8 months old. Many Before saying may be, it is proper to verify your statements. The 4.4 binaries are no older than the end of December. So they are old. Who cares? Harold
Re: Differnce between Xfree and Xorg
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, Alexander Gottwald wrote: On Wed, 12 May 2004, aroushdi wrote: I am a little bit confused I see here that we have moved to Xorg distribution . I took a look at XFree.org and it seems they have Binaries for Cygwin till 4.4 . These binaries are likely to be very outdated. We moved to X.org because it was easier for Cygwin/X developers to get cvs access there. XFree only allowed cvs access for a few people from the core team. We had to ask them to include the changes into their cvs. As a result the XFree cvs was always a few weeks up to some months behind the Cygwin/X development. The cygwin part from XFree may now be about 7 or 8 months old. Many Before saying may be, it is proper to verify your statements. The 4.4 binaries are no older than the end of December. So they are old. Who cares? Equally, I might point out that (until the recent bulk import), much of cygwin's build tree outside the small area of the Xwin server was several months old. (It's hard to compare exactly without some work, since the people who did the import did it carelessly, losing most of the identifiers - doesn't inspire much confidence in their ability). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
