Re: who are the right people?

[Jason McVetta]

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Ryan Carboni  wrote:
>
> keep in mind, just how many computers run Intel. We don't backdoor
> encryption. We backdoor everything.
>

The back door is a *feature*, not a bug, right?

For instance, this company is quite proud of their back door technology,
and are openly selling access to it:  https://www.absolute.com/en/
about/persistence

*Persistence is the only technology that keeps you in complete command with
> a self-healing, two-way connection to any endpoint or application — even if
> they are off the network. It’s a fundamentally new approach to security,
> leveraging our privileged position embedded in the firmware of billions of
> endpoints.*


According to their knowledgeable and courteous salesman, whom I once
chanced to meet, use cases for the back door include locating and
recovering stolen corporate laptops.

Re: A raging public debate - or not - was [z...@freedbms.net: Re: republican fools]

[Zenaan Harkness]

This should have had Subject: "part 1" sorry...

Also, this part 1 for some strange reason failed to appear...
Z


On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 01:09:07PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> The eternal vigilance we must display when we have relatively solid
> foundations, as we do in Australia notwithstanding the mostly self
> serving corrup politicians and other power brokers, is notable.
> 
> At least once a year, those behind the scenes to to fuck us over in
> Australia, with deceptive and undermining "public discourse".
> 
> And roughly every 10 to 20 years, TPTB actually run a referendum to
> try to turn Australia into a republic, on one or another "emotive,
> politically correct, hot social topic of the day" such as:
> 
>  - "recognizing" Aboriginals in the constitution so the parliament
>can pass laws specifically about them (pro- or anti-) thus
>instituting a constitutionally racist regime
> 
>  - getting rid of "the Queen" or "the Crown" or "the Monarch" as head
>of state because "surely we got ta have an Australian as head of
>state" (the current topic du jour), which is hogwash, since the
>ultimate Australian head of state is only titular anyway (i.e.
>holding no significant power except some power to declare war,
>which has always been left to our parliament anyway)
> 
>  - turning us into a republic, because "republics are wonderful, just
>look at America"
> 
> 
> In all cases, the public discourse as lead by TPTB is deceptive and
> highly narrow - the LEGAL foundations within our current system/
> federal Australian constitution, are always ignored (except that we
> in the public open our eyes to the deception and have the
> conversation we need to have), such as the following legal
> foundations:
> 
>  - invocation of the Blessing of Almighty God
>(legally, a GREAT foundation to have in any constitution)
> 
>  - the Crown/ the parliament of the UK
>(legally good for us since it brings in Magna Charta, Bill of
>Rights (old English/imperial bill of rights - i.e. William and
>Mary Cess.) and other imperial legislation some of which is
>absolutely in our interests as individual humans within Australia.
> 
> 
> Alas, the powers that be don't like the fact of the existence of the
> Blessing of Almighty God at the foundation of our Australian federal
> Constitution!
> 
> They also don't like the fact that our forefathers discussed in the
> constitution debates, and specifically spoke "the supreme absolute
> and uncontrollable authority remains with the people".
> 
> 
> And so, as to be expected, The Powers That Be continue to try to
> undermine these (by any modern standards) very good, foundations that
> we have in Austalia.
> 
> Regards,
> Zenaan
> 
> 
> 
> - Forwarded message from Zenaan Harkness  -
> 
> From: Zenaan Harkness 
> To: Charles Mollison 
> Cc: 'John Wilson' , 'Doug Harrison' 
> , 'RAY PLATT' , 'Rena 
> Iliades' , 'Bev'
>   , 'Mark B' , 
> cppe...@mindspring.com, debi...@yahoo.com.au, darry...@hotmail.com, 
> daved...@iprimus.com.au, dprin...@alphalink.com.au,
>   'Peter Lindsay' , 'Mark Filby' 
> , fl...@reachnet.com.au, 'Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka' 
> , granddu...@hotmail.com,
>   gregcadwalla...@hotmail.com, 'George Gault' , 
> 'Jim' , johng...@bigpond.com, 'Jim MacLeod' 
> , 'JohnV'
>   , knowyourrig...@ratfm.com, l...@aldoda.com, 
> marsiergn2...@yahoo.com.au, nma...@bigpond.net.au, 
> ozlibera...@skymesh.com.au, peterfo...@ozunited.com, "'Us @ SumOfUs'"
>   , and...@colonialleather.com.au, 
> timbodedid...@gmail.com, beatonmydr...@aol.com, fenja_schu...@yahoo.com
> Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 12:44:52 +1000
> Subject: Re: republican fools
> 
> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 11:16:39AM +1000, Charles Mollison wrote:
> > We would all do well to take note of John Wilson’s wise words here below.
> > 
> > However, a new Constitution could fix all these problems if it is
> > properly drafted. (Whether or not it be for a Constitutional
> > Monarchy OR a Democratic Republic.)
> 
> Please stop spreading such rubbish!
> 
> Per the Quick and Garran annotations and the foundational hansard
> conferences and debates:
> 
> "The supreme absolute and uncontrollable authority remains with the
> people."
> 
> Those who push for change are failing to see that we in Australia,
> 
>  already have one of the finest constitutions, IN THE WORLD!
> 
> 
> We cannot grant to ourselves MORE authority than we, the people, are
> already declared to have, by our CURRENT constitution.
> 
> 
> The ONLY problems are that people DON'T KNOW THE 

A raging public debate - or not - Part 2 - was [z...@freedbms.net: Re: republican fools]

[Zenaan Harkness]

- Forwarded message from Zenaan Harkness  -

From: Zenaan Harkness 
To: Charles Mollison 
Cc: 'Doug Harrison' , 'RAY PLATT' 
, 'Rena Iliades' , 'Bev' 
, 'Mark B'
, cppe...@mindspring.com, 
debi...@yahoo.com.au, darry...@hotmail.com, daved...@iprimus.com.au, 
dprin...@alphalink.com.au, 'Peter Lindsay'
, 'Mark Filby' , 
fl...@reachnet.com.au, 'Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka' , 
granddu...@hotmail.com,
gregcadwalla...@hotmail.com, 'George Gault' , 
'Jim' , johng...@bigpond.com, 'Jim MacLeod' 
, 'JohnV'
, knowyourrig...@ratfm.com, l...@aldoda.com, 
marsiergn2...@yahoo.com.au, nma...@bigpond.net.au, ozlibera...@skymesh.com.au, 
and...@colonialleather.com.au,
fenja_schu...@yahoo.com, beatonmydr...@aol.com, 
timbodedid...@gmail.com, jillb...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 12:47:11 +1000
Subject: Re: Australian Republican Movement

A warning to everyone, keep a close on eye on these "ARM" guys and
anyone who even smells similar, they may well cause major,
irreversible problems for Australia!

Regards,
Zenaan Harkness,
Victoria, Australia


On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 11:36:36AM +1000, Charles Mollison wrote:
>  
> 
> Just to illustrate that the ARM is motivated, financed and active!
> 
>  
> 
> Unless we get united and work together, the ARM will succeed in scrapping the 
> Monarchy and having an Australian Head of State but we will left with all the 
> other problems in our society and system of government that John has touched 
> on.
> 
>  
> 
> Charles Mollison
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Hi Charles,
> 
> We're hitting the streets to spread the message that Australia should have an 
> Australian as head of state - and we need your help.
> 
> The plan is simple: we are doing a targeted letterbox drop as part of a 
> national day of action. The more homes we reach, the more interest we 
> generate in our cause. The republic campaign is growing but the momentum we 
> build depends on supporters like you. That's why we'd like you to come along 
> and give us a hand to promote the republic:
> 
> When? 10am, Saturday 13 May 2017.
> Where? Volunteer meetup to be confirmed following RSVP.
> How do I RSVP to help? Click on your State:
>  
> 
>  QLD
>  
> 
>  NSW
>  
> 
>  ACT
>  
> 
>  VIC
>  
> 
>  TAS
>  
> 
>  SA
>  
> 
>  WA
> 
> We hope you can make it! 
> 
> You can help regardless of where you are on the day, so if you're in the 
> country or regional Australia we'll send out a volunteer kit with 
> instructions. And if you're busy on the day we have more activities planned 
> in the coming months.
> 
> Best,
> 
> 
> David McGregor
> National Organiser
> Australian Republic Movement
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> This email is sent by the Australian Republic Movement.
> 
> Australian Republic Movement
> PO Box 7188
> Watson, ACT 2602
> Australia
> 
> ACN 094 419 619 
> 
> http://www.republic.org.au/unsubscribe 
> 
>   
> 
>  
> 

- End forwarded message -

Re: who are the right people?

[Ryan Carboni]

Maybe. Maybe not.

But regardless of who is moonlighting for whom, even if it is entirely
unpaid and inadvertent (which beggars some disbelief), this was a top
picture shared on many social media outlets:
https://i.redd.it/m2qtwn72m7ny.png

Not shown by the mainstream media though.

Who decides for you what to think? Whoever it is, doesn't seem very
trustworthy right now.


Here's a simple law that congress could add that would decuple security:
"copyright is voided for software two years after the end of life, or if
after one year a critical vulnerability is unpatched"
Well, lawyers could go through it and convert it into legalcode for the
judicial architecture to parse.

Personally I am very much in favor of allowing free reverse engineering of
DOS and early Windows products.

Regardless, the most important use of non-government encryption is the
protection of trade secrets (hence the design of portable offline cipher
machines up to the late eighties). The rights of poor people never go into
the calculus of the powerful or the free market.

For some reason, this calculus currently seems to also exclude national
advantage. Everyone is hacking each other, but no one seems to really...
care?

Conclusions are hard to come by in this world for some reason.

What would it take to convince you that your world view was entirely wrong?

What world view could possibly fit the current four-dimensional model of
the world?

How hard would it be to reorient the current network of nonprofits in favor
of privacy to well... improve privacy? Design open source products that are
as secure as an iPhone? How hard is it to see that there's something
seriously wrong with the world?

Re: who are the right people?

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 03:21:52PM -0700, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> https://semiaccurate.com/2017/05/01/remote-security-exploit-2008-intel-platforms/
> 
> 
> First a little bit of background. SemiAccurate has known about
> this
> vulnerability for literally years now, it came up in research we
> were doing on hardware backdoors over five years ago. What we found
> was scary on a level that literally kept us up at night.
> For obvious reasons we couldn’t
> publish what we found out

Yeah, obvious.

Just as well they kept their work hidden until after it got exposed
by other channels nearly 10 years later, otherwise we might have
thought SemiAccurate was fundamentally compromised from the get go
and are now trying to cash in on their 10 year old "find".

I mean, what scruples, what ... integrity.

Security hole in Intel ME [was Re: who are the right people?]

[Mirimir]

On 05/01/2017 11:21 AM, Ryan Carboni wrote:
> https://semiaccurate.com/2017/05/01/remote-security-exploit-2008-intel-platforms/
> 
> 
>> First a little bit of background. SemiAccurate has known about this
> vulnerability for literally years now, it came up in research we were doing
> on hardware backdoors over five years ago. What we found was scary on a
> level that literally kept us up at night. For obvious reasons we couldn’t
> publish what we found out but we took every opportunity to beg anyone who
> could even tangentially influence the right people to do something about
> this security problem. SemiAccurate explained the problem to literally
> dozens of “right people” to seemingly no avail. We also strongly hinted
> that it existed at every chance we had.
> 
> 
> ...
> 
> 
>>  The problem is quite simple, the ME controls the network ports and has
> DMA access to the system. It can arbitrarily read and write to any memory
> or storage on the system, can bypass disk encryption once it is unlocked
> (and possibly if it has not, SemiAccurate hasn’t been able to 100% verify
> this capability yet), read and write to the screen, and do all of this
> completely unlogged. Due to the network access abilities, it can also send
> whatever it finds out to wherever it wants, encrypted or not.
> 
> 
> keep in mind, just how many computers run Intel. We don't backdoor
> encryption. We backdoor everything.
> 
> We should have adopted the Clipper chip.

;)

Another useful quote from SemiAccurate:

| The short version is that every Intel platform with AMT, ISM, and
| SBT from Nehalem in 2008 to Kaby Lake in 2017 has a remotely
| exploitable security hole in the ME (Management Engine) not CPU
| firmware. If this isn’t scary enough news, even if your machine
| doesn’t have SMT, ISM, or SBT provisioned, it is still vulnerable,
| just not over the network. For the moment. From what SemiAccurate
| gathers, there is literally no Intel box made in the last 9+ years
| that isn’t at risk. This is somewhere between nightmarish and
| apocalyptic.[/QUOTE]

According to Intel:

| There is an escalation of privilege vulnerability in Intel® Active
| Management Technology (AMT), Intel® Standard Manageability (ISM),
| and Intel® Small Business Technology versions firmware versions
| 6.x, 7.x, 8.x 9.x, 10.x, 11.0, 11.5, and 11.6 that can allow an
| unprivileged attacker to gain control of the manageability features
| provided by these products.  This vulnerability does not exist on
| Intel-based consumer PCs.

https://security-center.intel.com/advisory.aspx?intelid=INTEL-SA-00075=en-fr

You can check your CPUs for vPro etc at https://ark.intel.com/#@Processors

Intel's mitigation guide:
https://downloadmirror.intel.com/26754/eng/INTEL-SA-00075%20Mitigation%20Guide%20-%20Rev%201.1.pdf

Re: McAfee: Everyone's a faggot, and so can you

[Zenaan Harkness]

> No speaker switch, tho.

Well of course - gotta have at least one transducer io pin which can
be used as a microphone by the five eyes. Duhh..

> With articles titled 'John McAfee’s ‘hack-proof’ phone is doomed to
> fail' it seems this fucker is headed down the correct path.

McAfee is to all appearances an unhinged man and he sold out his
last company to The Man. Why would he be any more trustworthy this
time?

I wish it were different... and there's a chance my assessment is
incorrect of course, and if so that would be good news.


> >> Hardware isn’t the problem when it comes to mobile privacy.""
> >> Privacy-focused hardware just isn’t that good of a business.""
> >> The market is already saturated with privacy phone failures.""

Lugenpressenessenen indeed..

> Lol, these pozzed faggots can into journalism.
> 
> Hardware has everything to do with security, software has everything to do 
> with insecurity.”"
> -John McAfee

Re: who are the right people?

[juan]

On Mon, 1 May 2017 15:21:52 -0700
Ryan Carboni  wrote:

> https://semiaccurate.com/2017/05/01/remote-security-exploit-2008-intel-platforms/
> 
> 
> > First a little bit of background. SemiAccurate has known about this
> vulnerability for literally years now,

who are the right people?

[Ryan Carboni]

https://semiaccurate.com/2017/05/01/remote-security-exploit-2008-intel-platforms/


> First a little bit of background. SemiAccurate has known about this
vulnerability for literally years now, it came up in research we were doing
on hardware backdoors over five years ago. What we found was scary on a
level that literally kept us up at night. For obvious reasons we couldn’t
publish what we found out but we took every opportunity to beg anyone who
could even tangentially influence the right people to do something about
this security problem. SemiAccurate explained the problem to literally
dozens of “right people” to seemingly no avail. We also strongly hinted
that it existed at every chance we had.


...


>  The problem is quite simple, the ME controls the network ports and has
DMA access to the system. It can arbitrarily read and write to any memory
or storage on the system, can bypass disk encryption once it is unlocked
(and possibly if it has not, SemiAccurate hasn’t been able to 100% verify
this capability yet), read and write to the screen, and do all of this
completely unlogged. Due to the network access abilities, it can also send
whatever it finds out to wherever it wants, encrypted or not.


keep in mind, just how many computers run Intel. We don't backdoor
encryption. We backdoor everything.

We should have adopted the Clipper chip.

Re: Happy Labour day, May 1

[juan]

On Mon, 1 May 2017 14:25:01 +0300
Georgi Guninski  wrote:

> Happy Labour day.
> 
> Some people do the labour, some take the results. AFAICT this is
> "division of labour".

Haha! That's a good one. Anyway, that's the sort of result you
get in autoritarian societies whether they are 'socialist' or
'capitalist'.

Re: Happy Loyalty Day, May 1

[Ben Tasker]

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Jim  wrote:

> > Georgi Guninski guninski at guninski.com
> > Mon May 1 04:25:01 PDT 2017
> >
> > Happy Labour day.
>
> It's fucking Loyalty Day.
> Not Labour Day.
> Not May Day.
> Loyalty Day.
>
>
It was May Day centuries before USians tried to call it Labour (or Loyalty)
day, so May Day is still correct (unless you're in the US, then it's
arguable)

But in 1958 he proclaimed 1 May to be "Law Day", so it could also be Law
Day too.


> It was originally called "Americanization Day,"

*shudder*



-- 
Ben Tasker
https://www.bentasker.co.uk

Re: thepiratebay.org behind cloudflare

[Ben Tasker]

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Razer  wrote:

>
> I assume the upstream
> provider for the local ISP is AOL which would explain why the only time
> we were ever notified about a 'torrentviolator' was in regard to Warner
> content,
>

Warner in particular, are very keen on monitoring torrents, and pay various
third parties to monitor swarms and extract IP addresses of anyone sharing
their content. The third party contractors then look at who owns the
relevant block, and sends a notification to that ISP (it's normally
automated).

It's less likely to be because AOL was upstream than it is simply a product
of the fact that Warner are absolutely shit-hot on trying to keep on top of
their content being shared (for all the good it does).

They don't notice and catch everyone, but IME they've got a far better
detection rate than other publishers.


-- 
Ben Tasker
https://www.bentasker.co.uk

Re: thepiratebay.org behind cloudflare

[Razer]

On 05/01/2017 08:38 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
>
>
> On 05/01/2017 10:36 AM, Razer wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > I don't think there's been a decentralized Internet since AOL
> > first appeared. But it works... For them. Now days Warner, part of
> > AOL Time Warner, seems to sniff all torrent packets going through
> > their portals for Warner content and notifies downstream admins.
>
> A much more economical attack where seed boxes operated by hostile
> parties record IP addresses of connecting users was the dominant
> torrent surveillance model for a long time.  Typically, a comically
> self-mutilating corporation (thou shalt not promote our product to a
> wide audience at no cost to us) would provide a contractor with a list
> of "intellectual property" items to monitor and report on.  Either the
> contractor would blackmail the account holders at those IP addresses,
> or refer them to their ISPs for hostile action.
>
> I recall a study from maybe 10 years ago, indicating that
> then-availble blocklists of known and probable "troll" IPs were around
> 90% effective.
>
> Got pointers to any more current information, especially regarding
> inspection of data in transit?  Inquiring minds wants to know...
>
> :o)
>
>

All I know is that the computer lab for seniors I was volunteering at,
which utilizes a local ISP, was notified that SOMEONE using their
services had torrented a Warner content file. I assume the upstream
provider for the local ISP is AOL which would explain why the only time
we were ever notified about a 'torrentviolator' was in regard to Warner
content, a music video which could have just as easily been downloaded
from YouTube direct using Jdownloader or similar.

Rr

Skrymions: Data storage breakthough

[Jim]

> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
> Fri Apr 14 04:22:51 PDT 2017
> 
> I am waiting for any cypherpunk or non-cypherpunk to provide
> any evidence to support the optimistic, false, and highly
> dangerous, pro-technology stance.

You faggot.  Only a dipshit reads "false and highly dangerous" and
thinks you aren't a letters agent.  Get better b8.

Happy Loyalty Day, May 1

[Jim]

> Georgi Guninski guninski at guninski.com
> Mon May 1 04:25:01 PDT 2017
> 
> Happy Labour day.

It's fucking Loyalty Day.
Not Labour Day.
Not May Day.
Loyalty Day.

wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalty_Day
President Dwight D. Eisenhower proclaimed May 1, 1955, the first
observance of Loyalty Day.""

Loyalty Day is defined as follows in 36 U.S.C. § 115:

(a) Designation - May 1 is Loyalty Day.
(b) Purpose - Loyalty Day is a special day for the
reaffirmation of loyalty to the United States
and for the recognition of the heritage of
American freedom.
 (c) Proclamation - The President is requested to
issue a proclamation:

(1) calling on United States Government officials
to display the flag of the United States on
all Government buildings on Loyalty Day; and
(2) inviting the people of the United States to
observe Loyalty Day with appropriate ceremonies
in schools and other suitable places.

> Some people do the labour, some take the results.

Some people are made to supplant service by the beasts, and some are
(((chosen))).

[tor-dev] Contents of tor-dev digest...

[Jim]

> Mirimir mirimir at riseup.net
> Thu Apr 13 18:11:17 PDT 2017
> 
> That's a dishonestly incomplete quote, asshole.

Much like this dishonestly incomplete post.  We snip unecessary
redundancies, my friend.  No one reading the archives will get the
wrong idea about you, vpnanon.

> Dickwad

We all were, once, weren't we.

> Fuck off.

I see you do not object to my assertation that Tor is absolutely
tracable.

See:
>> globe.rndm.de
>> atlas.torproject.org
>> torflow.uncharted.software
>> collector.torproject.org
>> 
>> And I am sure there are more ways to track the goyim:
>> 
>> metrics.torproject.org
>> blog.torproject.org/category/tags/metrics
>> trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/org/teams/MetricsTeam
>> lists.torproject.org/pipermail/metrics-team/
>> 
>> And the tool used to study their efforts guised as the opposite:
>> 
>> ooni.torproject.org
>> 
>> You wouldn't be trying to trick the children that read this list in
>> the future, now, are you, vpnanon ?

It seems you are.

Re: thepiratebay.org behind cloudflare

[Steve Kinney]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



On 05/01/2017 10:36 AM, Razer wrote:

[ ... ]

> I don't think there's been a decentralized Internet since AOL
> first appeared. But it works... For them. Now days Warner, part of
> AOL Time Warner, seems to sniff all torrent packets going through
> their portals for Warner content and notifies downstream admins.

A much more economical attack where seed boxes operated by hostile
parties record IP addresses of connecting users was the dominant
torrent surveillance model for a long time.  Typically, a comically
self-mutilating corporation (thou shalt not promote our product to a
wide audience at no cost to us) would provide a contractor with a list
of "intellectual property" items to monitor and report on.  Either the
contractor would blackmail the account holders at those IP addresses,
or refer them to their ISPs for hostile action.

I recall a study from maybe 10 years ago, indicating that
then-availble blocklists of known and probable "troll" IPs were around
90% effective.

Got pointers to any more current information, especially regarding
inspection of data in transit?  Inquiring minds wants to know...

:o)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZB1ZbAAoJEECU6c5XzmuqhgEH/0D16jxEQ89gMBiQbtD3ahR6
IMtyVa7dAvxmf8g2C0NT7/drER9NtbYlO4R1lYV2mB3thKH4FdlOwp7Sf8zlA1F5
/tu1QqSS6tCSSvUJvrtuy01jDGisEbKn3FijFkDO1cv6p4kM1VyhSSjF3w8HNJ1x
hItcr5mX/XFaLlIt/k3gaMWcYyPBnU3UnwMnB2hRvC61ZAw+chPRmO5yxUk8TRD7
nb5sCf2A5iZax/JjHM7UHwZ+dlRczYzX/quuGmvOToLTBxF8AlB1D6AhogBHJGMY
UGJ+VCYcXHhKDr00a9DBzVFs2PK1KhRxCtnDUEhKKXe04plrQz8h98vYUWClMJA=
=CURf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

McAfee et al

[Telepwn Jesus]

> Razer g2s at riseup.net
> Mon May 1 08:14:33 PDT 2017
>
> "Nigga".

Leave it to the (((rayzer))) to culturally appropriate.

> to the junkpile.

Not a recycler, eh?

Qubes - more shit from the american pentagon nazis

[Jim]

> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
> Sun Apr 30 00:42:36 PDT 2017
> 
> a woman from poland

encyclopediadramatica.rs/Joanna_Rutkowska

Spammers n' Scammers: Riseup Changes Account Creation protocol

[Jim]

> Razer g2s at riseup.net
> Tue Apr 18 06:51:06 PDT 2017
> 
> Riseup

Honeypot like their friends at the Torah Project.

Fwd: [apc.members] OpenVPN

[Jim]

> Steve Kinney admin at pilobilus.net
> Sat Apr 15 09:43:14 PDT 2017
> 
> A real VPN connection routes all network traffic from the machine in
> question through a remote host via an encrypted connection.  
> 
> A browser-based "vpn connection" is no such thing.  It only routes 
> the browser's own traffic through a remote host - IF it works, and 
> UNTIL it is compromised by an exploit hosted on a site the
over-confident
> user visits.  
> 
> It leaves the system wide open to multiple families of side
> channel attacks, and if your security model includes State and
> Corporate actors as potential adversaries, that's not a hypothetical
> or acceptable risk.

Tor Browser in a nutshell, eh, vpnanon?

Re: McAfee et al

[Razer]

The only faggot I see here is you. "Nigga".

How old are you? 15?

Another protonmail address to the junkpile.

McAfee: Everyone's a faggot, and so can you

[Telepwn Jesus]

>inb4 "muh anti-islamj00++merikkkans" LARPing

John McAfee, with the help of MGT [0], is building a "truly private 
smartphone". Nigger added switches on the back to physically disconnect the 
battery, camera, and microphone, as well as the antennas for WiFi, Bluetooth, & 
geolocation. No speaker switch, tho.

With articles titled 'John McAfee’s ‘hack-proof’ phone is doomed to fail' it 
seems this fucker is headed down the correct path.

Some quotes from the lungenpresse:
>> None of this sounds like it’ll make a meaningful difference for users.""
>> Hardware isn’t the problem when it comes to mobile privacy.""
>> Privacy-focused hardware just isn’t that good of a business.""
>> The market is already saturated with privacy phone failures.""

Lol, these pozzed faggots can into journalism.

Hardware has everything to do with security, software has everything to do with 
insecurity.”"
-John McAfee

[0]: 
mgtci.com/datastreamx/mgt-signs-letter-of-intent-to-develop-privacy-mobile-phone
[1]: newsweek.com/john-mcafee-privacy-phone-smartphone-590373

Re: This Carboni person is not on the up and up

[Razer]

On 04/30/2017 01:55 PM, juan wrote:
> The Intercept is currently an arm of the NSA


Pics or it didn't happen.

Rr

Re: thepiratebay.org behind cloudflare

[Razer]

On 04/30/2017 03:04 PM, juan wrote:

>
>   ...looks as if the whole 'internet' is already owned by
>   cloudflare? It's mildly interesting because it shows that it's
>   rather easy to route most of the world's traffic through a
>   single system - contrary to all the bullshit about
>   'decentralization' 'complexity' and whatnot. 
>
>
>


A few years ago *someone* took an axe or some such to a fiber optic
bundle in the SF Bay area and killed the internet for all the bay area
south to Salinas. This is exactly what is NOT supposed to happen. Right?

I don't think there's been a decentralized Internet since AOL first
appeared. But it works... For them. Now days Warner, part of AOL Time
Warner, seems to sniff all torrent packets going through their portals
for Warner content and notifies downstream admins.

But about piratebay  https://twitter.com/ioerror/status/561583278319501313

Reddit (warning; thread title links to piratebay):
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/2uaxqz/after_being_down_for_51_days_the_original_pirate/

BTW, the .org site is easliy reachable this morning from my location. I
had been using the .red mirror b/c the .org site was 'down' all the time.

Rr

Re: Qubes - more shit from the american pentagon nazis

[Tomasz Rola]

On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:53:51PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
[...]
> 
>   A Java programmer asked the master whether computer had Buddha's
>   nature.
>   
>   The master answered "Objects are existential distractions, take the
>   Class in Lisp; it begins at"
> 
>   ...
> 
>   The student waited a pregnant pause, twitched his head left and
>   right in a decidedly Southern Indian continental Indian manner and
[...]

Those who have ever had such a problem, try new model of master which
sports generational garbage collection. I have read they can do it in
a blink nowadays, without anybody noticing anything, unless they were
looking very carefully for signs.

-- 
Regards,
Tomasz Rola

--
** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature.  **
** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home**
** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened...  **
** **
** Tomasz Rola  mailto:tomasz_r...@bigfoot.com **

Re: What is the value of the State?

[\0xDynamite]

>> How does anarchy provide the high-level of organization needed to
>> produce a car?
>
> Humans have this funny habit of organising themselves, through
> conversation into action, to meet actual needs or desires. "Social
> animals" and all..
>
> Seriously, the problem is not, has never been and never will be, lack
> of self-interest motivation to create trinkets and "wealth", sadly.

Yet, they haven't "self-organized" to come together and FIX the
problem in their own self-interest, have they?  So there either is an
error in the analysis or there is some EXISTENTIALLY OTHER force that
prevents it that is not of this world --otherwise they would come
together and knock it down.  But because of it's other-dimensional
nature, it is completley "invisibile" to them or unfamiliar, and don't
know how to approach the problem.

\0x