RE: CyberPatrol sues cryptanalysts who revealed flaws in itssoftw

2000-03-24 Thread Fisher Mark

 Ed Gerck wrote:
  As to the counter-example you ask, the general public profits by
  lack of disclosure of the algorithm that allows nuclear bombs
  to be made with 1 pound of enriched uranium.   We have less
  nuclear powers.
 
I'd like one of the real physicists on the list to weigh in on this, but a 1
lb. enriched uranium nuclear bomb sounds unrealistic to me.  Last I knew, it
was more like 25-50 pounds of enriched uranium.

Now, a plutonium bomb can supposedly be made with 10 pounds of plutonium,
which is around the size and shape of a goose egg.  [Once I'd heard that, I
knew that suitcases nukes would someday be made, just because they could be
made.]
===
Mark Leighton Fisher[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomson Consumer ElectronicsIndianapolis IN
"Their walls are built of cannon balls,
Their motto is `Don't tread on me`"





RE: U.S. Census questions

2000-03-24 Thread Fisher Mark

What I object to is the _forced_ "kindness" based on mob rule, where 
it is decreed that we must all donate money at the point of a gun to 
support welfare bums who got high instead of reading and studying.

Welfare may have started with the best of intentions, but the result is
multiple generations of families on welfare, welfare mothers and fathers
entering 'AFDC' as their occupation (Aid to Families with Dependent
Children, i.e. welfare), kids being dragged through crackhouses from birth
and then shipped off to school where the teachers are supposed to overcome
all the bad influences the child took in from birth to 5, etc.   Not to
mention parents who say, "I never learned my multiplication tables and it
never hurt me none."  [I suspect Tim and I could swap lots of these kinds of
stories, with my wife and his sister both being teachers.]  Receiving
welfare without having to work for it in some way doesn't work -- we have
given it a fair try as a society, only to prove just how bad the idea was.


We should not only end taxation as we know it today, we should 
imprison those who have stolen our taxes and force them to work off 
their debts. Put them in camps and let them work off their debt. For 
most of them, this will make life in the camps. Sounds fair to me.

Maybe it's because I'm a Lutheran small-'l' libertarian who thinks that even
Lucifer will eventually be redeemed, but imprisoning them doesn't seem to
solve the problem to me.  Just giving current welfare recipients the choice
of working or starving seems like the best solution to me, as it addresses
the current problem of the welfare recipient taking from society and not
returning anything to society.  Anyone who can't adapt to that solution will
either starve or turn to crime.  Those who turn to crime will eventually be
ground under the wheels of justice -- although the chance of getting caught
on any one burglary is only 2%, burglars have a yearly chance of 78% of
being caught due to the necessary repeat nature of the crime.  Justice is
not swift, but it is relentless in a relatively law-abiding society like the
U.S.A.
===
Mark Leighton Fisher[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomson Consumer ElectronicsIndianapolis IN
"Their walls are built of cannon balls,
Their motto is `Don't tread on me`"





RE: How to avoid participating in census legally?

2000-03-24 Thread James A. Donald

--
Whenever you do something legally, they just pass more laws.  There is
no point.  Just do it illegally.  

--digsig
 James A. Donald
 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
 T1TO6NF9MeRXAaSwhmxLQYttE79g1wweal5w4X4w
 4O9y+1LWTPT/oKUG99WGUJpxE2MfVe79y5wvggzs8