Re: A Brevital Moment (was..Ignore Aimee Farr)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- At 08:26 PM 9/13/2001 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote: Bell's Assassination Politics put cypherpunks on some protective intelligence agendas. It would not be implausible to assume you were being monitored to see if you run with the seeded assassination memes, if only for analytical purposes. These matters are taken seriously by those charged with the care of protected persons. (Contrary to what some here would have you believe, subtlety can get you a much higher threat-rating than overtly threatening correspondence.) Jim is a fool though not a dangerous one. No one should consider implementing any betting pools till there is enough cover traffic from legit digital cash apps. If one were to be created this would be an ideal time and Ben Laden the ideal target. How many Americans would consider creating such a pool to be evil? Rising to the bait, debating whether such-and-such a purpose is behind Farr's postings, speculating on Farr's true intent, all this does is spur on the postings, the baiting, the provocation. Just say no to responding to ANY of Farr's postings, and I would almost put money that the behavior will extinguish within a week. Baiting? Provocation? No, a caveat. Do not tolerate behavior of that nature. It subjects you all to scrutiny and mischaracterization. What about Mr. K-S that hides behind his hushmail jacket Don't forget the power tie ;-) and asks for names and addresses.why doesn't somebody cuss him out? What, for protected speech and actions? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Hush 2.0 wmAEARECACAFAjuhpoAZHGtleXNlci1zb3plQGh1c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRAg4ui5IoBV n5ptAJ9QKvtPlXbf1nP8ee0uAVTMq4sTiwCgr5PcgT1k7+cwVzKb3BjuwChoCv4= =8WNj -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: A Brevital Moment (was..Ignore Aimee Farr)
At 08:26 PM 9/13/01 -0500, Agent Farr wrote: Bell's Assassination Politics put cypherpunks on some protective intelligence agendas. Longtime fans would recognize that this was rent-seeking, one gang vs. another: the federal gang's ability to put 1e7 on O.B-L's noggin. vs. distributed anonymous (ie, citizen's AP) Most Wanted Monopolists *hate* competition, by definition. When they outlaw Bournouille's law, only birds will fly...
Re: A Brevital Moment (was..Ignore Aimee Farr)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- At 08:26 PM 9/13/2001 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote: Bell's Assassination Politics put cypherpunks on some protective intelligence agendas. It would not be implausible to assume you were being monitored to see if you run with the seeded assassination memes, if only for analytical purposes. These matters are taken seriously by those charged with the care of protected persons. (Contrary to what some here would have you believe, subtlety can get you a much higher threat-rating than overtly threatening correspondence.) Jim is a fool though not a dangerous one. No one should consider implementing any betting pools till there is enough cover traffic from legit digital cash apps. If one were to be created this would be an ideal time and Ben Laden the ideal target. How many Americans would consider creating such a pool to be evil? Rising to the bait, debating whether such-and-such a purpose is behind Farr's postings, speculating on Farr's true intent, all this does is spur on the postings, the baiting, the provocation. Just say no to responding to ANY of Farr's postings, and I would almost put money that the behavior will extinguish within a week. Baiting? Provocation? No, a caveat. Do not tolerate behavior of that nature. It subjects you all to scrutiny and mischaracterization. What about Mr. K-S that hides behind his hushmail jacket Don't forget the power tie ;-) and asks for names and addresses.why doesn't somebody cuss him out? What, for protected speech and actions? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Hush 2.0 wmAEARECACAFAjuhY2gZHGtleXNlci1zb3plQGh1c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRAg4ui5IoBV nx+xAJ44c2wiLze9qfZr+5VQ08KgXKMiQgCeIJIIs5n2g/C1ECaDCcGh+GxYi9o= =G0uG -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: A Brevital Moment (was..Ignore Aimee Farr)
-- On 13 Sep 2001, at 20:26, Aimee Farr wrote: My post was not bait. The reason we have anything left of the amendments so frequently talked about in here is due to the independence of the judiciary. While you can question aforesaid independence, threatening the judiciary is beyond the pale. I have not seen any threats on this list to judges except your own. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG mBbFybVtN//9TWHKI38Ci+qZnDro4s/kORfW+Jd1 4JnAeMYe4DBpTW9S8+cI5MhVV/UPBhgjv1qcQgLYS
