RE: davinci git updated to v2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-15 Thread Jon Povey
Nori, Sekhar wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:54:57, Jon Povey wrote:

 I did a bit of wiki-work this morning, improvements encouraged to
 http://wiki.davincidsp.com/index.php/Linux_Toolchain#Linux_Kernel
 
 Hmm, did not realize this is documented here so far. Thanks!
 
 The details look pretty complete to me. What would you would like to
 see added there?

I just meant, I wrote it up to the best of my ability, but TI folks /
Kevin / others may have a better idea of the differences between the
available kernels. If my understanding is good, great!

 Information on submitting patches upstream is documented here:
 http://wiki.davincidsp.com/index.php/Patch_upstream_sending

Ah, I wasn't aware of that page. There seem to be a lot of hidden gems
(and hidden crusy old junk) hiding in the wiki.

 Note that this is a public wiki, so modifications can be made by
 anyone in the community (not just TI folks).

Yup.. I just linked the upstream patches page from that kernels section
:)

-- 
Jon Povey
jon.po...@racelogic.co.uk

 
Racelogic is a limited company registered in England. Registered number 2743719 
. 
Registered Office Unit 10, Swan Business Centre, Osier Way, Buckingham, Bucks, 
MK18 1TB .
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by 
Racelogic Ltd for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is 
directed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you 
have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from 
your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the 
error by reply email so that the sender's address records can be corrected. The 
views expressed by the sender of this communication do not necessarily 
represent those of Racelogic Ltd. Please note that Racelogic reserves the right 
to monitor e-mail communications passing through its network
___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source


RE: davinci git updated to v2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-15 Thread Nori, Sekhar
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 13:57:10, Jon Povey wrote:
 Nori, Sekhar wrote:
  On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:54:57, Jon Povey wrote:

  I did a bit of wiki-work this morning, improvements encouraged to
  http://wiki.davincidsp.com/index.php/Linux_Toolchain#Linux_Kernel
 
  Hmm, did not realize this is documented here so far. Thanks!
 
  The details look pretty complete to me. What would you would like to
  see added there?

 I just meant, I wrote it up to the best of my ability, but TI folks /
 Kevin / others may have a better idea of the differences between the
 available kernels. If my understanding is good, great!

Oops, did not realize that you are the author! Should
have looked at the history :)


  Information on submitting patches upstream is documented here:
  http://wiki.davincidsp.com/index.php/Patch_upstream_sending

 Ah, I wasn't aware of that page. There seem to be a lot of hidden gems
 (and hidden crusy old junk) hiding in the wiki.

  Note that this is a public wiki, so modifications can be made by
  anyone in the community (not just TI folks).

 Yup.. I just linked the upstream patches page from that kernels section
 :)

Thanks for helping keep the wiki updated.

Regards,
Sekhar
___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source


RE: davinci git updated to v2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-14 Thread Nori, Sekhar
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:54:57, Jon Povey wrote:
 Kevin Hilman wrote:
  Raffaele Recalcati lamiapost...@gmail.com writes:

  I see you are talking about:
 
 http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git
  and not: http://arago-project.org/git/projects/linux-davinci.git
 
  Correct.
 
  As pointed out elsewhere, the arago tree is a TI development tree and
  includes several things that are not ready for upstream or work in
  progress etc.

 This gets asked and answered quite a bit, including by me.
 I did a bit of wiki-work this morning, improvements encouraged to
 http://wiki.davincidsp.com/index.php/Linux_Toolchain#Linux_Kernel

Hmm, did not realize this is documented here so far. Thanks!

The details look pretty complete to me. What would you would like to
see added there?

Information on submitting patches upstream is documented here:
http://wiki.davincidsp.com/index.php/Patch_upstream_sending

Note that this is a public wiki, so modifications can be made by anyone
in the community (not just TI folks).

Thanks,
Sekhar
___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source


Re: davinci git updated to v2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-12 Thread Kevin Hilman
Raffaele Recalcati lamiapost...@gmail.com writes:

 2010/3/12 Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com

 FYI...

 Davinci git has now been updated to v2.6.34-rc1.  With this release,
 we have dramatically reduced the gap between davinci git and mainline
 with lots of stuff making it in for 2.6.34.   Nice work!



 Nice!
 I need anyway more explanations.
 I see you are talking about:
 http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git
 and not:
 http://arago-project.org/git/projects/linux-davinci.git

Correct.  

As pointed out elsewhere, the arago tree is a TI development tree and
includes several things that are not ready for upstream or work in
progress etc.


 So, the best thing for me should be to move exactly now to it for
 testing input video with adv7180 on dm365?

Yes.

 Maybe I spend more time at this moment, but if it is the right
 thing I will spend less time in the future rebasing my code from
 arago old tree.

The right thing is to do your development and submit your patches as
close to mainline as possible.  If you have dependencies on other
features that are not upstream, you might have to merge from arago,
but patches should always be submitted against mainline (or davinci
git, which track closely with mainline)

Any out of tree dependencies should be stated in the patch changelog.

Kevin


___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source


Re: davinci git updated to v2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-12 Thread Raffaele Recalcati
  Nice!
  I need anyway more explanations.
  I see you are talking about:
  http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git
  and not:
  http://arago-project.org/git/projects/linux-davinci.git

 Correct.


thx


 As pointed out elsewhere, the arago tree is a TI development tree and
 includes several things that are not ready for upstream or work in
 progress etc.


ok




  So, the best thing for me should be to move exactly now to it for
  testing input video with adv7180 on dm365?

 Yes.

  Maybe I spend more time at this moment, but if it is the right
  thing I will spend less time in the future rebasing my code from
  arago old tree.

 The right thing is to do your development and submit your patches as
 close to mainline as possible.  If you have dependencies on other
 features that are not upstream, you might have to merge from arago,
 but patches should always be submitted against mainline (or davinci
 git, which track closely with mainline)

 Any out of tree dependencies should be stated in the patch changelog.


ok, I'm doing like that



 Kevin




Raffaele
___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source


Re: davinci git updated to v2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-11 Thread Raffaele Recalcati
2010/3/12 Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com

 FYI...

 Davinci git has now been updated to v2.6.34-rc1.  With this release,
 we have dramatically reduced the gap between davinci git and mainline
 with lots of stuff making it in for 2.6.34.   Nice work!


Nice!
I need anyway more explanations.
I see you are talking about:
http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git
and not:
http://arago-project.org/git/projects/linux-davinci.git

So,
the best thing for me should be to move exactly now to it for testing input
video with adv7180 on dm365?

Maybe I spend more time at this moment, but if it is the right thing I
will spend less time in the future rebasing my code from arago old tree.

Suggestions?
___
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source