Re: youtube
On Saturday 19 Apr 2008, can comert wrote: i can't watch videos on youtube cause of there isn't a flash player for 64 bit ports On adobes web site i read that if i can install 32-bit operating web browser i can watch the videos how can i install a 32-bit operating web browser or how can i watch videos on youtube etc?? Firstly, do NOT install the Debian package of Flash player: it will be installed system-wide in the name of root. You should NEVER allow software whose Source code you have not inspected to be installed with privileges. If you have to install caged software, you should install it somewhere under your home directory and run it in your own name. (In the case of Flash, run the installer file as yourself and it will take care of everything for you.) There are i-tal alternatives to the proprietary Flash player. There is a Python script called youtube-dl which downloads the .flv files from YouTube that would have been called up by the Flash player; you can then view them using ffplay which is part of ffmpeg. The lastest GNASH is also able to view YouTube videos (but may require a patched ffmpeg). -- AJS delta echo bravo six four at earthshod dot co dot uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unstable/testing/stable
Hans-J. Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi dear maintainers, so now I am using Deban for many years, and I am very happy with it. But there is one thing I could not understand for the whole time, and this is its policy. Can someone explain, why packages, which are available in testing, are not available in sid any more ? As I read on the Debian site, all packages are going through unstable, then are going to testing. If this is so, then, all packages in testing should be (logically) in unstable, too. But often they are not. (i.e. beryl completely disappeared out of unstable). I wouldn't call a handfull out of 2 packages often. It happens that is all. Sometimes packages get replaced by others and it takes time for that change to migrate to testing. Apart from that I can't think of a reason why tesing should have debs that unstable has not. But read http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals to learn about removals. Another thing I would ask: If running unstable (sid), is it always recommended to add the entries for stable and testing in /etc/sources.list, too ? I do so, and had no problems yet, but is it recommended or necessary ? This will increase the database. I know, these are stupid questions, but I could not find exact answers in the documentations. I would recommend keeping testing so you can go back to a working version if something breaks in unstable. Keeping stable seems wasted but can't hurt. Only bad effect is increasing the amount of downloads and database size. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: youtube
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:28:54AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: A J Stiles: Firstly, do NOT install the Debian package of Flash player: it will be installed system-wide in the name of root. In the name of root? What do you mean by that? It's not that the flash plugin requires some binary running with UID 0. It's just a library (copied using root permissions into a place where every user can see it, just like every other package) that's being used by a browser. All the code will be run with the privileges of the user running the browser. You should NEVER allow software whose Source code you have not inspected to be installed with privileges. Great idea. In about a year I might have finished reading the patch from linux 2.6.24-to linux-2.6.25 (bzipped: 9MB!). When that's done, I'll start reading the code of my bootloader and the compilers I am using. It's just too bad that everything's obsolete by the time I am finished. :) but fist you have to read the code for less or what ever you are using to view the code :) J. -- I wear a lot of leather but would never wear fur. [Agree] [Disagree] http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html -- For every fatal shooting, there were roughly three non-fatal shootings. And, folks, this is unacceptable in America. It's just unacceptable. And we're going to do something about it. - George W. Bush 05/14/2001 Philadelphia, PA signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: youtube
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:30:25PM +0300, can comert wrote: i can't watch videos on youtube cause of there isn't a flash player for 64 bit ports There is: aptitude install swfdec-mozilla So long, Aiko -- :wq ✉ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: youtube
Alex Samad: On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:28:54AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: Great idea. In about a year I might have finished reading the patch from linux 2.6.24-to linux-2.6.25 (bzipped: 9MB!). When that's done, I'll start reading the code of my bootloader and the compilers I am using. It's just too bad that everything's obsolete by the time I am finished. :) but fist you have to read the code for less or what ever you are using to view the code :) And before that, I have to read the code of the compiler that has been used for less. And then the code of the compiler that has been used to compile the first compiler, and then... Oh, and don't forget your CPU's microcode! :) J. -- Driving behind lorries carrying hazardous chemicals makes me wish for a simpler life. [Agree] [Disagree] http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: youtube
A J Stiles: Firstly, do NOT install the Debian package of Flash player: it will be installed system-wide in the name of root. In the name of root? What do you mean by that? It's not that the flash plugin requires some binary running with UID 0. It's just a library (copied using root permissions into a place where every user can see it, just like every other package) that's being used by a browser. All the code will be run with the privileges of the user running the browser. You should NEVER allow software whose Source code you have not inspected to be installed with privileges. Great idea. In about a year I might have finished reading the patch from linux 2.6.24-to linux-2.6.25 (bzipped: 9MB!). When that's done, I'll start reading the code of my bootloader and the compilers I am using. It's just too bad that everything's obsolete by the time I am finished. :) J. -- I wear a lot of leather but would never wear fur. [Agree] [Disagree] http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: youtube
On 4/21/08, Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:12:45PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: Alex Samad: On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:28:54AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: Great idea. In about a year I might have finished reading the patch from linux 2.6.24-to linux-2.6.25 (bzipped: 9MB!). When that's done, I'll start reading the code of my bootloader and the compilers I am using. It's just too bad that everything's obsolete by the time I am finished. :) but fist you have to read the code for less or what ever you are using to view the code :) And before that, I have to read the code of the compiler that has been used for less. And then the code of the compiler that has been used to compile the first compiler, and then... Oh, and don't forget your CPU's microcode! :) true I had presumed you could get an oscilloscope and read the waves first for accuracy and security and certainly your osciloscope is home made any way, without any sophisticated chip... I think we missed the point, we must remember some people prefer his OS pure, with no comercial software, I'm not against this software, I use flash-plugin in my machine, no critical problems, they are working, this time we have a flash-plugin (again and now really works)... J. -- Driving behind lorries carrying hazardous chemicals makes me wish for a simpler life. [Agree] [Disagree] http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html -- If there's a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. If the person has violated law, that person will be taken care of. - George W. Bush 09/30/2003 Washington, DC Commenting on the CIA leak that he and Cheney later admitted they approved -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIDPmdkZz88chpJ2MRAtwOAKDurd2Qk423uAbaR9aYqkmG4P73ygCfdzWo CYds1Ka6Uqenu2bJm2CEJIY= =UwN+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Perhaps the depth of love can be calibrated by the number of different selves that are actively involved in a given relationship. Carl Sagan (Contact) Jaime Ochoa Malagón Integrated Technology Tel: (55) 52 54 26 10
Re: youtube
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:12:45PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: Alex Samad: On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:28:54AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: Great idea. In about a year I might have finished reading the patch from linux 2.6.24-to linux-2.6.25 (bzipped: 9MB!). When that's done, I'll start reading the code of my bootloader and the compilers I am using. It's just too bad that everything's obsolete by the time I am finished. :) but fist you have to read the code for less or what ever you are using to view the code :) And before that, I have to read the code of the compiler that has been used for less. And then the code of the compiler that has been used to compile the first compiler, and then... Oh, and don't forget your CPU's microcode! :) true I had presumed you could get an oscilloscope and read the waves first for accuracy and security J. -- Driving behind lorries carrying hazardous chemicals makes me wish for a simpler life. [Agree] [Disagree] http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html -- If there's a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. If the person has violated law, that person will be taken care of. - George W. Bush 09/30/2003 Washington, DC Commenting on the CIA leak that he and Cheney later admitted they approved signature.asc Description: Digital signature
installing nvidia card in lenny apt source.list not quite right...
Dear folks, I tried installing the graphics card. Things went OK until I did the autoinstall step. It complained that there was something wrong with the apt sources.list entries. I think e.g. I am not picking up sid files etc. debian:/etc/apt# more sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-5 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-4 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-3 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-2 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main # Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib # Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free debian:/etc/apt# I did apt-get update. Comments appreciated. Michael Fothergill _ The next generation of Windows Live is here http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live
Re: installing nvidia card in lenny apt source.list not quite right...
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:27:25PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: I tried installing the graphics card. Things went OK until I did the autoinstall step. It complained that there was something wrong with the apt sources.list entries. I think e.g. I am not picking up sid files etc. debian:/etc/apt# more sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-5 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-4 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-3 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-2 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main # Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib # Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib Why no non-free on those lines? contrib without non-free never did seem to make much sense. deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free debian:/etc/apt# I did apt-get update. Comments appreciated. What does 'apt-get update' say? What is the exact error printed when you run the module-assistant command to compile the driver module? -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: installing nvidia card in lenny apt source.list not quite right...
I certainly recomends to remove the deb cdrom:* lines... On 4/21/08, Michael Fothergill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear folks, I tried installing the graphics card. Things went OK until I did the autoinstall step. It complained that there was something wrong with the apt sources.list entries. I think e.g. I am not picking up sid files etc. debian:/etc/apt# more sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-5 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-4 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-3 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-2 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main # Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib # Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free debian:/etc/apt# I did apt-get update. Comments appreciated. Michael Fothergill _ The next generation of Windows Live is here http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live -- Perhaps the depth of love can be calibrated by the number of different selves that are actively involved in a given relationship. Carl Sagan (Contact) Jaime Ochoa Malagón Integrated Technology Tel: (55) 52 54 26 10
RE: installing nvidia card in lenny apt source.list not quite right...
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:32:29 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: installing nvidia card in lenny apt source.list not quite right... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:27:25PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: I tried installing the graphics card. Things went OK until I did the autoinstall step. It complained that there was something wrong with the apt sources.list entries. I think e.g. I am not picking up sid files etc. debian:/etc/apt# more sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-5 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-4 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-3 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-2 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Lenny_ - Official Snapshot amd64 DVD Binary-1 20080407-11:52]/ lenny contrib main # Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib # Line commented out by installer because it failed to verify: deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib Why no non-free on those lines? contrib without non-free never did seem to make much sense. deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free debian:/etc/apt# I did apt-get update. Comments appreciated. What does 'apt-get update' say? What is the exact error printed when you run the module-assistant command to compile the driver module? -- Len Sorensen OK here's my output: debian:/etc/apt# uname -r 2.6.24-1-amd64 debian:/etc/apt# apt-get install module-assistant gcc nvidia-kernel-common Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libxklavier11 libtotem-plparser7 refblas3 lapack3 libhsqldb-java-gcj libportaudio2 libsuitesparse libneon27-gnutls libg2c0 libsndfile1 gcc-3.4-base Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: gcc-4.2 libc6-dev linux-libc-dev Suggested packages: autoconf automake1.9 bison flex gcc-doc gcc-multilib libtool manpages-dev gcc-4.2-doc gcc-4.2-locales gcc-4.2-multilib libgcc1-dbg libgomp1-dbg libmudflap0-4.2-dbg libmudflap0-4.2-dev glibc-doc build-essential Recommended packages: nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel The following NEW packages will be installed gcc gcc-4.2 libc6-dev linux-libc-dev module-assistant nvidia-kernel-common 0 upgraded, 6 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/3742kB of archives. After this operation, 17.1MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Selecting previously deselected package gcc-4.2. (Reading database ... 92011 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gcc-4.2 (from .../gcc-4.2_4.2.3-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gcc. Unpacking gcc (from .../gcc_4.2.2-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package linux-libc-dev. Unpacking linux-libc-dev (from .../linux-libc-dev_2.6.24-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libc6-dev. Unpacking libc6-dev (from .../libc6-dev_2.7-10_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package module-assistant. Unpacking module-assistant (from .../module-assistant_0.10.11.0_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package nvidia-kernel-common. Unpacking nvidia-kernel-common (from .../nvidia-kernel-common_20051028+1-0.1_all.deb) ... Setting up gcc-4.2 (4.2.3-3) ... Setting up gcc (4:4.2.2-2) ... Setting up linux-libc-dev (2.6.24-5) ... Setting up libc6-dev (2.7-10) ... Setting up module-assistant (0.10.11.0) ... Setting up nvidia-kernel-common (20051028+1-0.1) ... * * The update-modules command is deprecated and should not be used! * update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/nvidia-kernel missing LSB style header debian:/etc/apt# m-a update Updated infos about 85 packages debian:/etc/apt#
Re: installing nvidia card in lenny apt source.list not quite right...
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:50:23PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote: OK here's my output: debian:/etc/apt# uname -r 2.6.24-1-amd64 debian:/etc/apt# apt-get install module-assistant gcc nvidia-kernel-common Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libxklavier11 libtotem-plparser7 refblas3 lapack3 libhsqldb-java-gcj libportaudio2 libsuitesparse libneon27-gnutls libg2c0 libsndfile1 gcc-3.4-base Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: gcc-4.2 libc6-dev linux-libc-dev Suggested packages: autoconf automake1.9 bison flex gcc-doc gcc-multilib libtool manpages-dev gcc-4.2-doc gcc-4.2-locales gcc-4.2-multilib libgcc1-dbg libgomp1-dbg libmudflap0-4.2-dbg libmudflap0-4.2-dev glibc-doc build-essential Recommended packages: nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-kernel The following NEW packages will be installed gcc gcc-4.2 libc6-dev linux-libc-dev module-assistant nvidia-kernel-common 0 upgraded, 6 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/3742kB of archives. After this operation, 17.1MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Selecting previously deselected package gcc-4.2. (Reading database ... 92011 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gcc-4.2 (from .../gcc-4.2_4.2.3-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gcc. Unpacking gcc (from .../gcc_4.2.2-2_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package linux-libc-dev. Unpacking linux-libc-dev (from .../linux-libc-dev_2.6.24-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libc6-dev. Unpacking libc6-dev (from .../libc6-dev_2.7-10_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package module-assistant. Unpacking module-assistant (from .../module-assistant_0.10.11.0_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package nvidia-kernel-common. Unpacking nvidia-kernel-common (from .../nvidia-kernel-common_20051028+1-0.1_all.deb) ... Setting up gcc-4.2 (4.2.3-3) ... Setting up gcc (4:4.2.2-2) ... Setting up linux-libc-dev (2.6.24-5) ... Setting up libc6-dev (2.7-10) ... Setting up module-assistant (0.10.11.0) ... Setting up nvidia-kernel-common (20051028+1-0.1) ... * * The update-modules command is deprecated and should not be used! * update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/nvidia-kernel missing LSB style header debian:/etc/apt# m-a update Updated infos about 85 packages debian:/etc/apt# m-a prepare Getting source for kernel version: 2.6.24-1-amd64 apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.24-1-amd64 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libxklavier11 libtotem-plparser7 refblas3 lapack3 libhsqldb-java-gcj libportaudio2 libsuitesparse libneon27-gnutls libg2c0 libsndfile1 gcc-3.4-base Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: cpp-4.1 gcc-4.1 gcc-4.1-base libmudflap0 libmudflap0-dev linux-headers-2.6.24-1-common linux-kbuild-2.6.24 Suggested packages: gcc-4.1-locales gcc-4.1-doc gcc-4.1-multilib The following NEW packages will be installed cpp-4.1 gcc-4.1 gcc-4.1-base libmudflap0 libmudflap0-dev linux-headers-2.6.24-1-amd64 linux-headers-2.6.24-1-common linux-kbuild-2.6.24 0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 96.1kB/7471kB of archives. After this operation, 40.7MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Get: 1 http://http.us.debian.org testing/main libmudflap0 4.3.0-3 [96.1kB] Fetched 96.1kB in 7s (12.7kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package gcc-4.1-base. (Reading database ... 93223 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gcc-4.1-base (from .../gcc-4.1-base_4.1.2-19_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package cpp-4.1. Unpacking cpp-4.1 (from .../cpp-4.1_4.1.2-19_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gcc-4.1. Unpacking gcc-4.1 (from .../gcc-4.1_4.1.2-19_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libmudflap0. Unpacking libmudflap0 (from .../libmudflap0_4.3.0-3_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libmudflap0-dev. Unpacking libmudflap0-dev (from .../libmudflap0-dev_4.1.2-19_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package linux-headers-2.6.24-1-common. Unpacking linux-headers-2.6.24-1-common (from .../linux-headers-2.6.24-1-common_2.6.24-5_amd64.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected
