Bug#283116: Debian Installer Report
> Comments/Problems: > Installing worked fine until the reboot, whereafter it could not find > the IDE hard drive. Power-cycling fixed this, so I imagine it is a > problem with the power management. Have been recommended to compile It's quite likely, yes > custom kernel with APM, so going to try that. Also, small note, not > sure if this is the install or tasksel problem, but tasksel fails > completely to install desktop environment, citing problems with > various kde elements --> claims they are all uninstallable. Hoping > this is some sort of testing bug, but it has stuck around for a couple > of days. I've been hit by the same problem which kills my fully automated installs of desktop systems, at this moment. I guess that release managers are aware of this. Just in case, I'm cc'ing -release -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add lspci to the list of binaries installed by d-i?
> > Output of lspci and lspci -n:? > > Run lspci and lspci -n at the command line. We need this information to > deal with hardware detection problems. Debian Installer testers answers to this are very often that lspci is not available if they switch to vt2 during the install. Then our answer is recommending them to boot with something else, like Knoppix LiveCD. I'm wondering whether it could be possible to add /usr/bin/lspci as soon as possible in the installation process. That binary is part of the pciutils package. This is why I CC this mail to the package maintainer. That would probably require the pciutils source package to build a udeb package with only /usr/bin/lspci in it. There may be other arguments against this, but imho, this needs to be discussed...unless it has already been discussed and I'm not knowing..:-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#282781: debian-installer: Sparc64 RC2 netboot puts console in unicode mode erroneously
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Just tried the Sparc64 RC2 netboot debian-installer on an Ultra 5. > > > > It puts the console in unicode mode, despite the fact that the sparc > > console doesn't appear to do unicode. This leads to a messed up > > display, with characters out of place (usually, text is displaced a > > character to the left, and the right hand edge of list-boxes appears > > ragged rather than straight). It's usable, but doesn't exactly look > > professional. Playing around with debconf/framebuffer=false or adding > > LANG or LOCALE=C to the boot arguments didn't appear to make any > > difference unfortunately. > > IIRC this is fixed in the new localechooser. Currect, Bubulle? Yes. Localechooser adds an extra field in the languagelist which will have 0 or 1 as value. When, for whatever reason, framebuffer is disabled, only languages withthe 1 value are displayed. This is not automated : we will have to decide, for each language, chether it is displayed or not. The key will be : only display languages which can be displayed with the Altin-1 charset. So, basically, fixing this is post-sarge as localechooser is not ready for being included in the release (not enough testing). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283182: marked as done (Install Report)
Your message dated Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:02:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283182: Install Report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2004 03:07:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 19:07:48 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 65.106.220.162.ptr.us.xo.net (taiga.qcorps.com) [65.106.220.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXsw8-0007N3-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:07:48 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by taiga.qcorps.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iAR37j85005666 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:07:46 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:07:45 -0600 From: Jin Zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: White Fence User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Install Report Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/rc2/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz (timestamped: 18-Nov-2004 14:32) uname -a: Linux leffe 2.4.27-1-686 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:28:00 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 11/26/04 Method: preseeded PXE-DHCP-TFTP netboot install Machine: white box dual Xeon server Processor: dual Xeon 2.4 GHz Memory: 4 GB DDR PC-2100 ECC Registered Root Device: 3ware hardware raided logical disk (/dev/sda) Root Size/partition table: df -kl: /dev/sda2 933393131279752313 15% / /dev/sda190297 21821 63659 26% /boot /dev/sda7 5905972 32872 5573088 1% /home /dev/sda8 1874267 8239 1766025 1% /opt /dev/sda5 3937220651360 3085856 18% /usr /dev/sda6 933361189614693948 22% /var Output of lspci and lspci -n: lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. E7501 Memory Controller Hub (rev 01) :00:00.1 ff00: Intel Corp. E7500/E7501 Host RASUM Controller (rev 01) :00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. E7500/E7501 Hub Interface B PCI-to-PCI Bridge (rev 01) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 02) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 02) :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 42) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801CA LPC Interface Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801CA Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM SMBus Controller (rev 02) :01:1c.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04) :01:1d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04) :01:1e.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04) :01:1f.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04) :02:01.0 RAID bus controller: 3ware Inc 3ware 7000-series ATA-RAID (rev 01) :03:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) :03:02.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) :04:01.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27) lspci -n :00:00.0 0600: 8086:254c (rev 01) :00:00.1 ff00: 8086:2541 (rev 01) :00:02.0 0604: 8086:2543 (rev 01) :00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:2484 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:2487 (rev 02) :00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev 42) :00:1f.0 0601: 8086:2480 (rev 02) :00:1f.1 0101: 8086:248b (rev 02) :00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:2483 (rev 02) :01:1c.0 0800: 8086:1461 (rev 04) :01:1d.0 0604: 8086:1460 (rev 04) :01:1e.0 0800: 8086:1461 (rev 04) :01:1f.0 0604: 8086:1460 (rev 04) :02:01.0 0104: 13c1:1001 (rev 01) :03:02.0 0200: 8086:1010 (rev 01) :03:02.1 0200: 8086:1010 (rev 01) :04:01.0 0300: 1002:4752 (rev 27) Base
Bug#283193: disk-detect udeb needed
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: d-i Experience shows that we need a udeb that uses discover/whatever to find disk drives, then checks to make sure a disk was found, and if not, lets the user choose a module from a list of disk drivers, as in ethdetect. Since we don't have this, currently when the installer fails to find a disk, the user is stuck in partman, unless they know how to modprobe modules in the shell. Dealing with NFS mounting should be taken into account when designing this (assuming the rest of the installer will eventually support NFS root). This is, unfortunatly, a post-sarge issue. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Fwd: Bug#283166: Debian Installer no longer runs in qemu
Frans Pop wrote: > Today I upgraded qemu and now, if I start d-i, I only get a black screen > in the emulator window. The qemu monitor seems to work normally. > Starting with the -nographic option results in qemu not starting > completely and a complete hang. Have you tried hitting f1 to bypass the logo? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#283184: debian-installer: Lilo fails when configuring LVM over raid during installation
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
This is an older Dell Dimension desktop with Bios version A05 and a
PIII-450. I am using the Sarge RC2 net-installer.
Using the expert26 install, attempting to use LVM on top of raid-1.
Install raid-1 across two IDE hard drives, raid device md0, configured
as two physical raid partitions of 6GB each (hda1 and hdb1).
info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;Maxtor 90650U2;/dev/hda (6GB - ide1
master)
info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;WDC WD84AA;/dev/hdb (8GB - ide1
slave)
Make md0 an lvm partition, configure volume group vg00 and four
logical volumes:
info: /bin/report-hw: df: /dev/mapper/vg00-root_lv 575813 64563480530
12% /target
info: /bin/report-hw: df: /dev/mapper/vg00-home_lv 1965459 8239 1852363
0% /target/home
info: /bin/report-hw: df: /dev/mapper/vg00-usr_lv 1965459 82778 1777824
4% /target/usr
info: /bin/report-hw: df: /dev/mapper/vg00-var_lv 1074853 48619968890
5% /target/var
Write changes. Error on console #4:
"grub-installer: /boot is a lvm partition (dev/mapper/vg00-root_lv),
cannot install grub".
Lilo is given as an option in the installer menu. I choose to install
to the MBR of /dev/md0, this pops up a nag box saying the partition is
not marked active ("/dev/md/0 doesn't contain a valid partition
table").
If I mark it active, lilo-installer fails with:
sfdisk: ERROR: sector 0 does not have an msdos signature
/dev/md/0 unrecognized partition
sfdisk: 0 no such partition
Not marking the partition as active makes the lilo-installer fail with
an "error code 1"
So I can't get a boot-loader onto this system.
(Note that if I create another raid-1 container just for /boot, and
leave /root and the others configured as LVM partitions on a separate
raid container, the install works great, using grub this time).
Here are detailed logs after each choice offered by the installer.
Attempting to mark active:
Nov 24 17:25:26 grub-installer: /boot is a lvm volume
(/dev/mapper/vg00-root_lv), cannot install grub
Nov 24 17:31:18 main-menu[517]: DEBUG: Menu item 'lilo-installer' selected
Nov 24 17:31:18 main-menu[517]: DEBUG: configure lilo-installer, status: 4
Nov 24 17:31:18 main-menu[517]: DEBUG: configure kernel-installer, status: 0
Nov 24 17:31:18 main-menu[517]: DEBUG: virtual package kernel-installer
Nov 24 17:33:30 main-menu[517]: (process:15003): Disk /dev/md/0 doesn't contain
a valid partition table
Nov 24 17:33:30 main-menu[517]: (process:15003): I: Setting partition to
active...
Nov 24 17:33:30 main-menu[517]: (process:15003): sfdisk: ERROR: sector 0 does
not have an msdos signature
Nov 24 17:33:30 main-menu[517]: (process:15003): /dev/md/0: unrecognized
partition
Nov 24 17:33:30 main-menu[517]: (process:15003):
Nov 24 17:33:30 main-menu[517]: (process:15003): sfdisk: 0: no such partition
Nov 24 17:33:30 main-menu[517]: WARNING **: Configuring 'lilo-installer' failed
with error code 1
Nov 24 17:33:30 main-menu[517]: WARNING **: Menu item 'lilo-installer' failed.
Not marking active:
Nov 24 17:38:41 grub-installer: /boot is a lvm volume
(/dev/mapper/vg00-root_lv), cannot install grub
Nov 24 17:38:41 grub-installer: /boot is a lvm volume
(/dev/mapper/vg00-root_lv), cannot install grub
Nov 24 17:39:05 main-menu[517]: DEBUG: Menu item 'lilo-installer' selected
Nov 24 17:39:05 main-menu[517]: DEBUG: configure lilo-installer, status: 4
Nov 24 17:39:05 main-menu[517]: DEBUG: configure kernel-installer, status: 0
Nov 24 17:39:05 main-menu[517]: DEBUG: virtual package kernel-installer
Nov 24 17:39:08 os-prober: debug: running init
/usr/lib/os-probes/init/10filesystems
Nov 24 17:39:08 os-prober: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on
/dev/discs/disc0/part1
Nov 24 17:39:08 os-prober: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on
/dev/discs/disc0/part2
Nov 24 17:39:08 os-prober: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on
/dev/discs/disc0/part5
Nov 24 17:39:08 os-prober: debug: running /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests on
/dev/discs/disc1/part1
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635): Disk /dev/md/0 doesn't contain
a valid partition table
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635): mount:
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635): Mounting none on /target/proc
failed
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635): : Device or resource busy
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635): Warning: '/proc/partitions'
does not match '/dev' directory structure.
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635): Name change: '/dev/dm-0'
-> '/dev/vg00/root_lv'
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635): Fatal:
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635): map file must be on the boot
RAID partition
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: (process:15635):
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: WARNING **: Configuring 'lilo-installer' failed
with error code 1
Nov 24 17:40:32 main-menu[517]: WARNING **: Menu item 'lilo-installer' failed
Bug#283182: Install Report
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/rc2/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz (timestamped: 18-Nov-2004 14:32) uname -a: Linux leffe 2.4.27-1-686 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:28:00 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 11/26/04 Method: preseeded PXE-DHCP-TFTP netboot install Machine: white box dual Xeon server Processor: dual Xeon 2.4 GHz Memory: 4 GB DDR PC-2100 ECC Registered Root Device: 3ware hardware raided logical disk (/dev/sda) Root Size/partition table: df -kl: /dev/sda2 933393131279752313 15% / /dev/sda190297 21821 63659 26% /boot /dev/sda7 5905972 32872 5573088 1% /home /dev/sda8 1874267 8239 1766025 1% /opt /dev/sda5 3937220651360 3085856 18% /usr /dev/sda6 933361189614693948 22% /var Output of lspci and lspci -n: lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. E7501 Memory Controller Hub (rev 01) :00:00.1 ff00: Intel Corp. E7500/E7501 Host RASUM Controller (rev 01) :00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. E7500/E7501 Hub Interface B PCI-to-PCI Bridge (rev 01) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 02) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 02) :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 42) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801CA LPC Interface Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801CA Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM SMBus Controller (rev 02) :01:1c.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04) :01:1d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04) :01:1e.0 PIC: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 I/OxAPIC (rev 04) :01:1f.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82870P2 P64H2 Hub PCI Bridge (rev 04) :02:01.0 RAID bus controller: 3ware Inc 3ware 7000-series ATA-RAID (rev 01) :03:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) :03:02.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) :04:01.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27) lspci -n :00:00.0 0600: 8086:254c (rev 01) :00:00.1 ff00: 8086:2541 (rev 01) :00:02.0 0604: 8086:2543 (rev 01) :00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:2484 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:2487 (rev 02) :00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev 42) :00:1f.0 0601: 8086:2480 (rev 02) :00:1f.1 0101: 8086:248b (rev 02) :00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:2483 (rev 02) :01:1c.0 0800: 8086:1461 (rev 04) :01:1d.0 0604: 8086:1460 (rev 04) :01:1e.0 0800: 8086:1461 (rev 04) :01:1f.0 0604: 8086:1460 (rev 04) :02:01.0 0104: 13c1:1001 (rev 01) :03:02.0 0200: 8086:1010 (rev 01) :03:02.1 0200: 8086:1010 (rev 01) :04:01.0 0300: 1002:4752 (rev 27) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: This is a smooth installation. The only drawback is the SMP was not recognized and the smp kernel was not installed by d-i. I had to add the smp kernel in the second installation phase. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283000: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:42:13 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283000: Package: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2004 21:06:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 25 13:06:45 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXQpB-0003H7-00; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:06:45 -0800 Received: from [82.33.47.86] ([82.33.47.86]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 25 Nov 2004 21:06:52 + Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 21:06:09 + From: Tim Beauregard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041007 Debian/1.7.3-5 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package: installation-reports X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2004 21:06:56.0779 (UTC) FILETIME=[B261B5B0:01C4D332] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-11-20 from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-11-20 1200 GMT Method: dhcp connection to blueyonder.co.uk following boot from CDROM Machine: Carrera desktop with Asus motherboard, Nvidia chipset. Processor: AMD Athlon 2200XP Memory: 512 MB DDR Root Device: Maxtor hard drive on IDE interface Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 61.4 GB, 61492838400 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7476 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 11216 9767488+ 83 Linux /dev/hda21341620339062047+ 83 Linux /dev/hda3 *6204747510217340c W95 FAT32 (LBA) /dev/hda412171340 996030 82 Linux swap / Solaris Partition table entries are not in disk order Disk /dev/hdb: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdb1 * 11216 9767488+ 83 Linux /dev/hdb212171338 979965 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hdb31339972967400707+ 83 Linux Output of lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce CPU bridge (rev b2) :00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce 220/420 Memory Controller (rev b2) :00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce 220/420 Memory Controller (rev b2) :00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 01aa (rev b2) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce ISA Bridge (rev c3) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce PCI System Management (rev c1) :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce USB Controller (rev c3) :00:03.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce USB Controller (rev c3) :00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce Ethernet Controller (rev c2) :00:05.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 01b0 (rev c2) :00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce Audio (rev c2) :00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce PCI-to-PCI bridge (rev c2) :00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce IDE (rev c3) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce AGP to PCI Bridge (rev b2) :01:06.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105 [Rhine-III] (rev 86) :01:07.0 Bridge: Texas Instruments PCI2040 PCI to DSP Bridge Controller :02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NVCrush11 [GeForce2 MX Integrated Graphics] (rev b1) lspci -n: :00:00.0 0600: 10de:01a4 (rev b2) :00:00.1 0500: 10de:01ac (rev b2) :00:
Bug#275421: marked as done (Install fails after kernel selection; initrd-tools dependency not met)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:47:40 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Issue has been resolved has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2004 23:51:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 07 16:51:15 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ssa9.serverconfig.com [209.51.129.180] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CFi2V-0001bb-00; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:51:15 -0700 Received: from dsl027-161-197.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.161.197] helo=[192.168.1.7]) by ssa9.serverconfig.com with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CFi2S-PP-Ag for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:51:12 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: Debian Bug Submission <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Install fails after kernel selection; initrd-tools dependency not met Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:51:11 -0400 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.1 (v33, 10.3) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ssa9.serverconfig.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alltc.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Daily snapshot from 10/06/2004 from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/powerpc/20041006/ uname -a: Date: 10/07/2004 19:15 Method: Boot from CD by holding down C key after chime Machine: Apple Aluminum 15" PowerBook G4 1.25GHz Processor: PowerPC G4 1.25GHz Memory: 1.5GB Root Device: Root Size/partition table: Output of lspci and lspci -n: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[E] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] Comments/Problems: Installation proceeded without issue, using ftp-linux.cc.gatech.edu mirror for unstable install. At around 76% completion of base system installation, screen for choosing kernel was presented. The 2.6.8-powerpc kernel image was selected, and an error immediately followed. Check the third virtual console showed: Setting up base-config (2.47) ... umount: /target/dev/pts: Invalid argument umount: /target/dev/shm: Invalid argument umount: /target/proc/bus/usb: Invalid argument Get:1 ftp://ftp-linux.cc.gatech.edu sid/main Packages [3188kB] Get:2 ftp://ftp-linux.cc.gatech.edu sid/main Release [85B] Fetched 3189kB in 37s (84.9kB/s) Reading Package Lists... Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: initrd-tools: Depends cramfsprogs (>= 1.1-4) but it is not going to be installed Depends dash but it is not going to be installed libreadline4: Depends: libreadline-common but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). Fourth virtual console shows: Oct 8 01:25:40 base-installer: info: Found kernels 'kernel-powerpc-smp,...kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc-chrp' Oct 8 01:25:43 base-installer: info: Using kernel 'kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc' Oct 8 01:25:43 base-installer: info: Setting do_initrd='yes'. Oct 8 01:25:43 base-installer: info: Setting link_in_boot='yes'. Oct 8 01:25:43 base-installer: info: Installing initrd-tools. Oct 8 01:25:44 base-installer: error: exiting on error base-installer/kernel/failed-initrd-tools-install Oct 8 01:38:33 base-installer: init: ^MStarting pid 424, console/vc/2: '/bin/sh'
Bug#275427: marked as done (Install halts with debootstrap exit error)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:52:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Issue appears to have been resolved has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2004 02:00:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 07 19:00:47 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ssa9.serverconfig.com [209.51.129.180] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CFk3q-0006Gv-00; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:00:47 -0700 Received: from dsl027-161-197.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.161.197] helo=[192.168.1.7]) by ssa9.serverconfig.com with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CFk3n-0006jJ-QO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:00:44 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: Debian Submission Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Install halts with debootstrap exit error Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:00:41 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ssa9.serverconfig.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - yepthatsme.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Daily business card snapshot from 10/06/2004 from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/powerpc/20041006/ uname -a: Linux finn 2.6.8-powerpc #1 Tue Sep 14 00:15:52 CEST 2004 ppc unknown Date: 10/07/2004 20:45 Method: Boot from CD by holding down C key after chime; installed as expert-powerpc Machine: Apple Titanium PowerBook G4 500MHz Processor: PowerPC G4 500MHz Memory: 1.5GB Root Device: IDE1 master (hda) - 20.0 GB TOSHIBA MK2016GAP Root Size/partition table: IDE1 master (hda) - 20.0 GB TOSHIBA MK2016GAP #1 32.3kB Apple #2 27.6kB Macintosh #3 37.9kB Macintosh #4 27.6kB Macintosh #5 37.9kB Macintosh #6 102.4kB Macintosh #7 262.1kB Macintosh #8 262.1kB Patch Partit #9 819.2kB boot bootstrap #10 1.0GB swap swap swap #11 9.7GB ext3 root / #12 6.0GB hfs+ untitled 2 #13 3.2GB hfs+ untitled 3 11.3kB FREE SPACE Output of lspci and lspci -n: N/A Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[E] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] Comments/Problems: Installation proceeded without issue, using ftp-linux.cc.gatech.edu mirror for unstable install. At around 12% completion of base system installation, an error message was issued: [!!] Install the base system Base system installation error The debootstrap program exited with an error (return value 1). Check /var/log/messages or see virtual console 3 for the details. A check of the third virtual console showed: No matching physical volumes found No volume groups found Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... Fourth virtual console shows: Oct 8 02:42:58 base-installer: info: Execution hook before debootstrap Oct 8 02:42:58 base-installer: info: Running /usr/lib/base-installer.d/40netcfg Oct 8 03:11:00 kernel: eth1: New link status: Disconnected (0002) Oct 8 03:15:24 kernel: eth1: New link status: Connected (0001) This could very well be a network issue with the wireless LAN being used for the install, but there is an Aluminum PowerBook G4 next to that is not having any conn
Bug#261564: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:42:13 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283000: Package: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2004 18:43:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 26 11:43:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BpARH-y4-00; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:43:07 -0700 Received: from [82.33.47.170] ([82.33.47.170]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:43:24 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:43:05 +0100 From: Tim Beauregard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040722 Debian/1.7.1-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package: installation-reports X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 18:43:24.0039 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E646170:01C47340] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20040724 http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Mon Jul 26 18:26:54 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 20040726 Method: Boot from net-install CD Installed base system from same CD Installed remaining packages from ftp://ftp.uk.debian.org Machine: Clevo 2700C laptop (aka Rock Sigma Si) Processor: 1GHz Pentium III Memory: 512MB SD RAM Root Device: IDE Fujitsu Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 20.0 GB, 20003880960 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2432 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 10948787523+83 Linux /dev/hda2 10951156498015 82 Linux swap /dev/hda3 * 1157243210249470c W95 FAT32 (LBA) Output of lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 630 Host (rev 31) :00:00.1 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev d0) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513 (LPC Bridge) :00:01.1 Ethernet controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 PCI Fast Ethernet (rev 82) :00:01.2 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 07) :00:01.3 USB Controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] USB 1.0 Controller (rev 07) :00:01.4 Multimedia audio controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS PCI Audio Accelerator (rev 02) :00:01.6 Modem: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] AC'97 Modem Controller (rev a0) :00:02.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] Virtual PCI-to-PCI bridge (AGP) :00:0a.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI4410 PC card Cardbus Controller (rev 02) :00:0a.1 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments PCI4410 FireWire Controller (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 630/730 PCI/AGP VGA Display Adapter (rev 31) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Very happy with this install CD. Tim --- Received: (at 261564-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2004 02:47:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 18:47:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXsc6-0005l2-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:47:06 -0800 Recei
Bug#282997: bug in sarge net-inst
Alain Leroux wrote: > Output of lspci and lspci -n:? Run lspci and lspci -n at the command line. We need this information to deal with hardware detection problems. > Comments/Problems: The access to the network was impossible after reboot > because the system recognized my ethernet PCMCIA network card as eth1 Why was that a problem? Was eth1 something different before the reboot? What is the other ethernet interface on your computer? > I signalled an other bug, which prevented the user to install the sarge > distrib on a formatted disk. Now the problem is resolved perfectly and the > partition tool works OK I can't find this other bug open to close it. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#282992: installation-reports
Laurent CHARLES wrote: > Root Size/partition table: > /dev/hda1: NTFS 20Gb > /dev/hda5: SWAP 2Gb > /dev/hda6: ext2 50Mb /boot > /dev/hda7: ext3 37Gb / > Installation hang when installing grub boot loader Try putting the /boot partition closer to the front of the disk (in the first 5 g or so, you can resize the ntfs partition or move it) and see if that fixes the hang. Is this a complete system freeze, or can you switch to the third virtual console (with alt-f3) and see what the last messages are in the log during the freeze? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#282781: debian-installer: Sparc64 RC2 netboot puts console in unicode mode erroneously
Philip Armstrong wrote: > Just tried the Sparc64 RC2 netboot debian-installer on an Ultra 5. > > It puts the console in unicode mode, despite the fact that the sparc > console doesn't appear to do unicode. This leads to a messed up > display, with characters out of place (usually, text is displaced a > character to the left, and the right hand edge of list-boxes appears > ragged rather than straight). It's usable, but doesn't exactly look > professional. Playing around with debconf/framebuffer=false or adding > LANG or LOCALE=C to the boot arguments didn't appear to make any > difference unfortunately. IIRC this is fixed in the new localechooser. Currect, Bubulle? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#282814: installation-reports: [hppa] hardware detection & partitioning problems w/ 2.6
Paul Telford wrote: > Using the mini.iso image retrieved from > http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/daily/2.6/ today, the system > failed to autodetect my NIC (tulip). This works reliably with the 2.4 > image. AIUI, the 2.4 hppa kernel has almost everything built in, while the 2.6 kernel is more modular. Proably we're missing an item in discover for this card, which I assume is a pci card? Can you send lspci and lspci -n output for this machine so we can add it? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#282970: installation-reports: Broadcomm chip not detected (runs with b44 driver when loaded manual)
David Goodenough wrote: > the BCM4401 chip - ID 14e4:170c is identified correctly but is not > automatically loaded. WHat makes you think that it was detected if the installer does not load the module? > :02:05.0 0200: 14e4:170c (rev 02) > :02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4401-B0 100Base-TX > (rev 02) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/discover1-data-1.2004.11.09>grep 14e4170c * pci.lst:14e4170cethernetunknown BCM5705M 10/100/1000Base T Looks unknown to discover1 to me. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#283137: Problem when booting from second CD
reassign 283137 debian-cd thanks Margarita Manterola wrote: > This report was done with RC2 CDs, downloaded via bittorrent > > Known by my will to do weird things, this time I tried booting from the > second CD, instead of the first. It listed only "linux" and "expert" as > booting methods, so I chose "linux" > > But I couldn't get really far, because quite early in the installation > (just after reading the CD's data), it stated that the CD didn't contain > the correct kernel modules (there was a "mismatch" between the modules and > the kernel version), and took me back to the menu. Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on it. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#283137: Problem when booting from second CD
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 283137 debian-cd Bug#283137: Problem when booting from second CD Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-cd'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 282793 to initrd-tools, severity of 282793 is important, severity of 278887 is important ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 282793 initrd-tools Bug#282793: initial reboot fails with Dell PERC4i RAID Controller Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `initrd-tools'. > severity 282793 important Bug#282793: initial reboot fails with Dell PERC4i RAID Controller Severity set to `important'. > severity 278887 important Bug#278887: does not include megaraid2 module on initrd, which makes booting fail after debian install on several Dell machines Severity set to `important'. > merge 278887 282793 Bug#278887: does not include megaraid2 module on initrd, which makes booting fail after debian install on several Dell machines Bug#282793: initial reboot fails with Dell PERC4i RAID Controller Merged 278887 282793. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 282970 to discover1-data
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 282970 discover1-data Bug#282970: installation-reports: Broadcomm chip not detected (runs with b44 driver when loaded manual) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `discover1-data'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 282997 to installation-reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 282997 installation-reports Bug#282997: bug in sarge net-inst Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 282979 to linux-kernel-di-sparc, severity of 282979 is grave, merging 282979 278147 ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5 > reassign 282979 linux-kernel-di-sparc Bug#282979: Sun Sparcstation 20, Installation of Sarge netinst failed. Don't detect CDROM Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-kernel-di-sparc'. > severity 282979 grave Bug#282979: Sun Sparcstation 20, Installation of Sarge netinst failed. Don't detect CDROM Severity set to `grave'. > merge 282979 278147 Bug#278147: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc32: sparc32 cannot mount cdrom in d-i Bug#282979: Sun Sparcstation 20, Installation of Sarge netinst failed. Don't detect CDROM Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #278147 has `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc32-di'; #282979 has `linux-kernel-di-sparc' > tags 278147 - help Bug#278147: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc32: sparc32 cannot mount cdrom in d-i Tags were: help d-i Tags removed: help > tags 278147 pending Bug#278147: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-sparc32: sparc32 cannot mount cdrom in d-i Tags were: d-i Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian-install kernel and AIC-7901
Jan Medlock wrote: > I tried the d-i daily for 23 Nov 2004, which seems to use the same > kernel source (2.6.8-1) and, thus, has the same problem. Can anyone > confirm this is the case? IIRC this is a known problem with the 2.6.8 kernel and it's fixed in the newest kernel debs and udebs. Those udebs were uploaded yesterday, and should be on tomorrow's daily build of the installer. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [patch] debian-manual simplify dhcpd pxe sample conf
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:02PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > the example snippet for pxe use is quite complicated.
> > belows simplified config works for me and is greatly inspired by
> > -> http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerBootpTFTP
> >
> > yourfoobar may guide newbies like me. :-)
> >
> > --
> > maks
> >
> >
> > Index: installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml
> > ===
> > --- installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml (revision 24001)
> > +++ installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml (working copy)
> > @@ -63,10 +63,11 @@
> >
> >
> >
> > -option domain-name "example.com";
> > +option domain-name "yourdomain.org";
> > +option domain-name-servers yournameserver.org;
> DNS
> > -default-lease-time 6048;
> > -max-lease-time 604800;
> > +default-lease-time 600;
> > +max-lease-time 7200;
> the longer times are fine
shure but also pretty useless and aboves values are the one
from the default config.
> > allow booting;
> > allow bootp;
> > @@ -74,30 +75,17 @@
> > # The next paragraph needs to be modified to fit your case
> > subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> >range 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.253;
> > - option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> > - option broadcast-address 192.168.1.255;
> > +# tftp server ip address
> > + next-server 192.168.1.90;
> > # the gateway address which can be different
> > # (access to the internet for instance)
> >option routers 192.168.1.1;
> > -# indicate the dns you want to use
> > - option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.3;
> ^^^DNS
>
>
> You moved the DNS entry
> and asume a proper working DNS for the DHCP server.
> ( I don't like IP address neither in config files,
> but it's "advantage" is that it don't need DNS )
ok thanks for the hint, yes on the networks that i administer
i assume a working dns. glad to hear d-i doesn't..
anyway i still think that aboves dhcp entry is overcrafted
and that the one in the wiki gives you nice results.
> > -}
> > -
> > -host tftpserver {
> > -# tftp server ip address
> > - fixed-address 192.168.1.90;
> > + filename "/tftpboot/pxelinux.0";
> > + host tftpserver {
> > # tftp server hardware address
> >hardware ethernet 01:23:45:67:89:AB;
> > }
> >
> > -group {
> > - next-server 192.168.1.3;
> > - host tftpclient {
> > -# tftp client hardware address
> > - hardware ethernet 00:10:DC:27:6C:15;
> > - filename "/tftpboot/pxelinux.0";
> > - }
> > -}
>
> That is deleting the client it is all about.
well this entry got pushed up!
i agree that patches are not always easy readable.
> >
> >
>
> Please change the wiki
no i won't for shure as it's config is much easier to implement
and works for lots of people.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [patch] debian-manual pxe boot add small hint
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:38PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > belows patch adds a small hint where to find that tftp boot. > > perhaps it makes user more confident. ;-) > > > > but maybe to specific, maybe just added without the last phrase > > with special case? i leave it up to you. > > The "F12" seems indeed some kind of standard. ok, so better add this hint properly. :-) > > -- > > maks > > > > > > Index: installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml > > === > > --- installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml (revision 24001) > > +++ installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml (working copy) > > @@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ > > PXE boot functionality. > > This is a Intel re-implemention > > of TFTP boot. If so you may be able to configure your BIOS to boot from the > > -network. > > +network. Watch out Bios messages for Network boot. They may tell you which > > +hot key enables it. Newer boards often use . > +hot key enables it. Newer boards often use. > > > Or something else to get it through the XML parser. yup. > > > > > > > > Maks, > > Your feedback is appricated. > Please don't feel offended that I didn't accept your patches. i do not care about my patches, as long the manual gets better. as a first time tftp user i wanted to send feedback on the relevant parts. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [patch] debian-manual add xinetd snippet for tftpd
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:19PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > belows patch adds a note about how to start tftpd from xinetd. > > > > -- > > maks > > > > Thanks, but didn't I see just a patch about simply things? > > > Geert Stappers well having a config to paste simplifies things. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.4.27-6 source and i386 images available for testing
* Horms wrote: > If interested parties could take a look before I upload them I would > be grateful. Build fails on alpha, patch attached. Norbert --- tty_ioctl.c~ 2004-11-26 09:01:12.0 +0100 +++ tty_ioctl.c 2004-11-27 01:28:37.0 +0100 @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ int retval; struct sgttyb tmp; struct termios termios; + unsigned long flags; retval = tty_check_change(tty); if (retval)
Re: 2.4.27-6 source and i386 images available for testing
* Horms wrote: > If interested parties could take a look before I upload them I would > be grateful. Permissions of /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.4.27/apply/debian aren't perfect: -rwx--x--x 1 root root 4674 Nov 26 09:01 /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.4.27/apply/debian Building kernel-images as user fails with "Permission denied". Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283170: installation-reports: Success on OldWorld Power Mac 6500/250
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 26-Nov-2004; floppy images from http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/2004-11-26/powerpc/floppy-2.4/> uname -a: Linux quack 2.6.8-powerpc #1 Sun Oct 3 13:22:21 CEST 2004 ppc GNU/Linux Date: 26-Nov-2004, 2200 UTC Method: Installed from three floppies (boot, root, net-drivers), the machine has a ne2k-pci network card. Direct HTTP connection to the Internet. Machine: Apple Power Mac 6500/250 Processor: 603ev, 250MHz Memory: 32MB Root Device: IDE; /dev/hda2 Root Size/partition table: 4 partitions, hda1 is the Apple partition table, hda2 is / (1 GB), hda3 is swap space (256MB), hda4 is /home (1.8GB). Output of lspci and lspci -n: :00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. Bandit PowerPC host bridge (rev 03) :00:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8029(AS) :00:10.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. O'Hare I/O (rev 01) :00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT :00:0b.0 0600: 106b:0001 (rev 03) :00:0e.0 0200: 10ec:8029 :00:10.0 ff00: 106b:0007 (rev 01) :00:12.0 0300: 1002:4754 (rev 41) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [E] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[E] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: I booted from the boot floppy, then inserted the root floppy, I was then presented with a message telling me that the installer had started in low-memory mode (the machine has 32MB of physical memory). The "select language" items were still present in the d-i menu but ineffective since I was in low memory mode. I then proceeded to install drivers from the net-drivers floppy but d-i hadn't ejected the root floppy and floppy drives on Macs don't have an eject button. I had to eject the disk forcibly using a pin and the "rescue eject" function. The woody installer used to eject the root floppy as soon as it had finished loading the system, I think that would be nice in d-i too. My network card, a ne2k-pci card, was detected and DHCP worked fine. I selected as few installer modules as possible, everything worked okay. The hardware detection was somewhat faulty, it wanted to load drivers for a dozen of IDE chipsets. I unselected them all from the list of drivers to load and loaded the floppy and ide-disk modules only, the hard drive was detected fine. Partitioning was _very_ slow: there was a ~10 second delay between each screen, even more when it needed to perform operations on disk. I didn't see any obvious reason for the slowdown in the logs or in a shell. The rest of the installation was fine until the very end. I tried to select a 2.6.8 kernel from the list of available kernels but installation failed, in the log console I saw that it aborted because preinst (or postinst, I don't know) was asking for confirmation about the initrd. Retrying with 2.4.27 worked fine, apparently because d-i set do_initrd in kernel-img.conf for this image and not for the 2.6 one (?). The most difficult part of the install was installing a bootloader. Installing Quik from the d-i menu failed every time, so I googled a bit for the solution. I will repeat the exact steps I followed since it might be useful to someone else with a Power Mac 6500: 1. Create /dev/nvram with mknod /dev/nvram c 10 144 2. Use /target/sbin/nvsetenv to change OpenFirmware values like this: # /target/sbin/nvsetenv boot-device ata/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2 ^^^ 2 if the root device is /dev/hda2, 3 for hda3, etc # /target/sbin/nvsetenv input-device kbd # /target/sbin/nvsetenv output-device /bandit/ATY,264GT-B 3. Check that /target/etc/quik.conf exists and looks okay (with nano) 4. Install quik from the shell: # /target/sbin/quik -v -r /target Then proceed with the installation. Using "install a bootloader" at least once is important, quik.conf doesn't get created otherwise. I finished the installation and rebooted without problems. The end of the configuration detected a CD in my drive and automatically used it to setup sources.list, replacing my http entries. The CD was an old woody ppc CD, it would have been nice for the installer to detect this and not try to use it to install packages. I fixed sources.list myself in another terminal before proceeding with the actual install. After the installation I upgraded Quik with the a new version (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/11/msg00856.html> and installed the 2.6.8 kernel image from sarge for powerpc, which installed and booted fine with an
Bug#283142: Quik fails to install on beige G3
On (26/11/04 22:39), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > reassign #283142 debian-installer > thanks > > Ce jour Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Clive Menzies a dit: > > > Package: quik > > > > Version unknown - from sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso rc2 > > > > Apologies for the lack of the exact message but during the install, when > > installing quik I got a red screen saying "Failed to symlink to valid > > kernel . symlink /vmlinuz or /bootvmlinuz isn't linked to a valid > > kernel" > > um, that's not quik's fault, that's the installer's fault. there is no > vmlinuz on ppc, only vmlinux. i'm going to reassign this bug the > installer folks. the installer runs sysklogd; see the more informative > info on VT 3 and VT 4 (VT 2 is a shell you can use). i had to do all > that quik installation manually for a separate /boot partition. Oops - apologies. I've also been testing the i386 version of the installer and may have imagined I saw "vmlinuz" and unfortunately I didn't have time to repeat the process to make sure. > > > Upshot - quik fails to install. > > > > This is on a beige G3 266Mz - I've never been able to get quik working > > on this box. Reverting to BootX > > http://simonraven.nuit.ca/macppc/models.shtml, > http://wiki.kisikew.org/bin/view/Know/MacModels (same page, latter > slightly newer, though some of the links might still need editing) > should tell you about the beige G3s, and their extreme pickiness with > quik. that's an OF issue, that i don't know if we can get around in s/w > (quik) or not. I came across these pages just now - very useful thanks. I'm giving the G3 away and I've a number of other projects on the go and so I think I'll have to let this one go. The new owner will have to rely on BootX. > > PS for the d-i folks: there's a bug you can close, or at least take a look > at, and > that's #252426. sven luther has some working boot floppies, the default > ones still need to be tested on more machines i think. Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [patch] debian-manual pxe boot add small hint
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:38PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > belows patch adds a small hint where to find that tftp boot. > perhaps it makes user more confident. ;-) > > but maybe to specific, maybe just added without the last phrase > with special case? i leave it up to you. The "F12" seems indeed some kind of standard. > -- > maks > > > Index: installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml > === > --- installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml (revision 24001) > +++ installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml (working copy) > @@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ > PXE boot functionality. > This is a Intel re-implemention > of TFTP boot. If so you may be able to configure your BIOS to boot from the > -network. > +network. Watch out Bios messages for Network boot. They may tell you which > +hot key enables it. Newer boards often use . +hot key enables it. Newer boards often use. Or something else to get it through the XML parser. > > > Maks, Your feedback is appricated. Please don't feel offended that I didn't accept your patches. Cheers Geert Stappers signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [patch] debian-manual add xinetd snippet for tftpd
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:19PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> belows patch adds a note about how to start tftpd from xinetd.
>
> --
> maks
>
> Index: installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml
> ===
> --- installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml (revision 24001)
> +++ installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml (working copy)
> @@ -91,8 +91,27 @@
>
>
> Debian packages will in general set this up correctly by default when they
> -are installed.
> +are installed. But if you are using xinetd, you may need
> to add the following snippet in /etc/xinetd.conf:
>
> +
> +
> +
> +service tftp
> +{
> +disable = no
> + socket_type = dgram
> + protocol= udp
> + wait= yes
> + user= root
> + server = /usr/sbin/in.tftpd
> + flags = IPv4
> +}
> +
> +
> +
> +
> +Restart afterwards the xinetd with
> /etc/init.d/xinetd restart.
> +
>
>
> Look in that file and remember the directory which is used as the
Thanks, but didn't I see just a patch about simply things?
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [patch] debian-manual simplify dhcpd pxe sample conf
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:02PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> the example snippet for pxe use is quite complicated.
> belows simplified config works for me and is greatly inspired by
> -> http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerBootpTFTP
>
> yourfoobar may guide newbies like me. :-)
>
> --
> maks
>
>
> Index: installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml
> ===
> --- installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml (revision 24001)
> +++ installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml (working copy)
> @@ -63,10 +63,11 @@
>
>
>
> -option domain-name "example.com";
> +option domain-name "yourdomain.org";
> +option domain-name-servers yournameserver.org;
DNS
> -default-lease-time 6048;
> -max-lease-time 604800;
> +default-lease-time 600;
> +max-lease-time 7200;
the longer times are fine
> allow booting;
> allow bootp;
> @@ -74,30 +75,17 @@
> # The next paragraph needs to be modified to fit your case
> subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>range 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.253;
> - option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> - option broadcast-address 192.168.1.255;
> +# tftp server ip address
> + next-server 192.168.1.90;
> # the gateway address which can be different
> # (access to the internet for instance)
>option routers 192.168.1.1;
> -# indicate the dns you want to use
> - option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.3;
^^^DNS
You moved the DNS entry
and asume a proper working DNS for the DHCP server.
( I don't like IP address neither in config files,
but it's "advantage" is that it don't need DNS )
> -}
> -
> -host tftpserver {
> -# tftp server ip address
> - fixed-address 192.168.1.90;
> + filename "/tftpboot/pxelinux.0";
> + host tftpserver {
> # tftp server hardware address
>hardware ethernet 01:23:45:67:89:AB;
> }
>
> -group {
> - next-server 192.168.1.3;
> - host tftpclient {
> -# tftp client hardware address
> - hardware ethernet 00:10:DC:27:6C:15;
> - filename "/tftpboot/pxelinux.0";
> - }
> -}
That is deleting the client it is all about.
>
>
Please change the wiki
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Fwd: Bug#283166: Debian Installer no longer runs in qemu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For your information. - -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Bug#283166: Debian Installer no longer runs in qemu Date: Saturday 27 November 2004 00:09 From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Package: qemu Version: 0.6.0.dfsg.2-1 Severity: important Tags: d-i I have been using qemu very intensively to do testinstalls and debugging for Debian Installer. Until now, this worked absolutely perfectly. Today I upgraded qemu and now, if I start d-i, I only get a black screen in the emulator window. The qemu monitor seems to work normally. Starting with the -nographic option results in qemu not starting completely and a complete hang. In despair, I've downgraded to the previous version. The system on which I run qemu is Sarge with current 2.6.8 kernel. Cheers, FJP - -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.20041121-1 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages qemu depends on: ii bochsbios 2.1.1-10 BIOS for the Bochs emulator ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.7-10 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii sharutils 1:4.2.1-11 shar, unshar, uuencode, uudecode ii vgabios 0.4b-1 VGA BIOS software for the Plex86 a - -- no debconf information - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBp7tpgm/Kwh6ICoQRAl7IAJ0Z2+43+Q+galAVE5M/+JgzIfJJfwCdEaXT 5t4HNz4HVtRX5MsmI2zyamQ= =148r -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#283149: Obfuscated Argentinian Timezones
reassign 283149 libc6 retitle 283149 Please shorten down Argentinian timezones names thanks Quoting Margarita Manterola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: base-config > Serverity: normal > > Hi! > > I've seen this bug for a while now. Sorry for not reporting it earlier. > > When prompted to select the timezone, at second stage of the installer, if > you have chosen "Argentina" as the country, you get a dialog that is too > big to fit on screen, but can be corrected to show up correctly: > > The timezones are shown with the names of the most important Argentinian > cities, followed by a series of 2 initials, like TF, RT, VB, etc. > This initials don't really mean anything to Argentinian people (we don't > refer to our cities by their initials), and are the cause of the screen > getting too wide. > > If just the names of the cities could be shown, it could be much better. > > This information is located in /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab, and I'm > referring mainly to the "TZ" and "comments" column. I think it would be > better if just the "TZ" information was shown, without the comments. > This file is part of the libc6 package. Hence reassigning the bug to this package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282356: apt-setup doesn't to work anymore, produces mount help instead
severity 282356 minor thanks also sprach Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.21.1851 +0100]: > FWIW, I don't reproduce this on any of my 30 daily automated d-i > installs, which all went fine today. base-config 2.58, here's the typescript: Script started on Fri Nov 26 22:42:35 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get install base-config Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: adduser console-common console-data console-tools debconf debconf-i18n gettext-base libconsole liblocale-gettext-perl libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libtext-wrapi18n-perl Suggested packages: kbd-compat debconf-doc debconf-utils whiptail dialog gnome-utils libterm-readline-gnu-perl libgnome2-perl libqt-perl libnet-ldap-perl Recommended packages: apt-utils The following NEW packages will be installed: adduser base-config console-common console-data console-tools debconf debconf-i18n gettext-base libconsole liblocale-gettext-perl libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libtext-wrapi18n-perl 0 upgraded, 13 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 2398kB of archives. After unpacking 10.3MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Get:1 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main liblocale-gettext-perl 1.01-17 [16.8kB] Get:2 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main libtext-iconv-perl 1.2-3 [12.2kB] Get:3 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main libtext-charwidth-perl 0.04-1 [11.0kB] Get:4 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main libtext-wrapi18n-perl 0.06-1 [8442B] Get:5 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main debconf-i18n 1.4.40 [88.2kB] Get:6 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main debconf 1.4.40 [101kB] Get:7 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main console-data 2002.12.04dbs-46.2 [1142kB] Get:8 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main libconsole 1:0.2.3dbs-55 [127kB] Get:9 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main console-tools 1:0.2.3dbs-55 [302kB] Get:10 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main console-common 0.7.47 [99.1kB] Get:11 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main adduser 3.59 [93.9kB] Get:12 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main gettext-base 0.14.1-6 [91.1kB] Get:13 http://debian.ethz.ch sid/main base-config 2.58 [305kB] Fetched 2398kB in 0s (8734kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package liblocale-gettext-perl. (Reading database ... 7701 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking liblocale-gettext-perl (from .../liblocale-gettext-perl_1.01-17_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libtext-iconv-perl. Unpacking libtext-iconv-perl (from .../libtext-iconv-perl_1.2-3_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libtext-charwidth-perl. Unpacking libtext-charwidth-perl (from .../libtext-charwidth-perl_0.04-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libtext-wrapi18n-perl. Unpacking libtext-wrapi18n-perl (from .../libtext-wrapi18n-perl_0.06-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package debconf-i18n. Unpacking debconf-i18n (from .../debconf-i18n_1.4.40_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package debconf. Unpacking debconf (from .../debconf_1.4.40_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package console-data. Unpacking console-data (from .../console-data_2002.12.04dbs-46.2_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libconsole. Unpacking libconsole (from .../libconsole_1%3a0.2.3dbs-55_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package console-tools. Unpacking console-tools (from .../console-tools_1%3a0.2.3dbs-55_i386.deb) ... Setting up liblocale-gettext-perl (1.01-17) ... Setting up libtext-iconv-perl (1.2-3) ... Setting up libtext-charwidth-perl (0.04-1) ... Setting up libtext-wrapi18n-perl (0.06-1) ... Setting up debconf-i18n (1.4.40) ... Setting up debconf (1.4.40) ... Selecting previously deselected package console-common. (Reading database ... 8629 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking console-common (from .../console-common_0.7.47_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package adduser. Unpacking adduser (from .../archives/adduser_3.59_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gettext-base. Unpacking gettext-base (from .../gettext-base_0.14.1-6_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package base-config. Unpacking base-config (from .../base-config_2.58_all.deb) ... Setting up libconsole (0.2.3dbs-55) ... Setting up adduser (3.59) ... Setting up gettext-base (0.14.1-6) ... Setting up console-common (0.7.47) ... Looking for keymap to install: NONE Setting up console-data (2002.12.04dbs-46.2) ... Looking for keymap to install: NONE Setting up console-tools (0.2.3dbs-55) ... Setting up base-config (2.58) ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-setup Usage: mount -V : print version mount -h : print this help mount: list mounted filesystems mount -l : idem, including volume labels So far the informational part. Next the mounting. The command is `mount [-t fstype] something somewhere'. Details f
Processed: Re: Bug#282356: apt-setup doesn't to work anymore, produces mount help instead
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 282356 minor Bug#282356: apt-setup doesn't to work anymore, produces mount help instead Severity set to `minor'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#283149: Obfuscated Argentinian Timezones
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 283149 libc6 Bug#283149: Obfuscated Argentinian Timezones Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `libc6'. > retitle 283149 Please shorten down Argentinian timezones names Bug#283149: Obfuscated Argentinian Timezones Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please test new quik with initrd-support (was: Re: getting quik into sarge?
Ce jour Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Sven Luther a dit: > Mmm, i could test it on the umax apus 2000 and on the pmac 8200/120 i have > here, need to test that this weekend. quik didn't work yet on the umax, and i > have never really used it, so some kind of help would be welcome in order to > set it up. can start off here: http://simonraven.nuit.ca/macppc/models.shtml http://wiki.kisikew.org/bin/view/Know/MacModels as to the umaxen, i've had relatively easy success with a umax 3000 - desktop case, though the IDE/ATA on them is pretty fucked. it seems to take only one device at a time. the SCSI is a generic MESH chipset IIRC. > Mmm, wondering if there are some kind of ps2 or usb -> adb adapters, so i > could try using the KVM switch for the apple boxes too. i think so. dunno how common they are, or are still sold (i don't hang around computer/electronics stores, i get most of my stuff from dumpsters, etc.) > > and, better not to forget, the new quik.deb is available at > > http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/ > > Thanks, > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther eric -- Software Patents are patently wrong: http://swpat.ffii.org/papiere/eubsa-swpat0202/ustr0309/index.en.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#283130: marked as done (Typo bug in Spanish translation)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:41:03 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283130: Typo bug in Spanish translation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 18:40:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 10:40:09 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXl0r-0004CU-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:40:09 -0800 Received: from (erwin.amadeus) [200.115.206.87] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXl0j-0002XF-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:40:01 -0600 Received: from ulises.amadeus ([192.168.21.15] helo=ulises.home ident=mail) by erwin.amadeus with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXl0g-0005im-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:39:58 -0300 Received: from marga by ulises.home with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXl0Y-0006AN-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:39:50 -0300 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:39:50 -0300 From: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Typo bug in Spanish translation Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: countrychooser Severity: minor Tags: patch There are 2 small typo bugs in the Spanish translations. I'm attaching a patch. -- Bessos, Maggie. --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="es.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- es.po 2004-10-07 13:51:11.0 -0300 +++ es_new.po 2004-11-26 15:37:25.0 -0300 @@ -71,14 +71,14 @@ "or regions." msgstr "" "Basándose en su idioma, es probable que esté en alguno de los siguientes " -"paíseso regiones." +"países o regiones." #. Type: text #. Description #. Main menu entry #: ../templates-in:38 msgid "Choose country or region" -msgstr "Escoja un país o region" +msgstr "Escoja un país o región" #: ../countrylist:15 msgid "North America" --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- --- Received: (at 283130-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 22:41:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 14:41:58 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lns-th2-5f-81-56-227-253.adsl.proxad.net (kheops.homeunix.org) [81.56.227.253] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXomr-0006Qu-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:41:58 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA744F97F; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:41:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from kheops.homeunix.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10455-09; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:41:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3]) by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BE54F984; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:41:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426) id 1101823278; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:41:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:41:03 +0100 From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#283130: Typo bug in Spanish translation Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-message-flag: Outlook is a good virus spreading tool. It can send mail, too. X-pot_a_miel: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at kheops.frmug.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTE
Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss
Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > a well visible option to mount existing partitions without having them > > reformatted would be nice. If memory servers there was such an option in > > the > > old installer. > > The E-mail from Christian Perrier does explain how it can be done. I have to mention that I hesitated some time before closing the bug. Friedemann took care of reporting the issue so I didn't want to sound rude though I indeed think that the issue may be more minor than Friedemann imagined. In my opinion, users who may want to re-use existing partition are most often clever enough for finding a way to do what they want. However, we can imagine that choosing the "Use existing free space" choice in partman-auto could trigger the choice of re-using one of the existing partitions. There may be something to dig here...post-sarge..:-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#283010: Installation Report RC2 on Compaq AlphaServer DS20E
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:00:46AM +0100, Nils Juergens wrote: > On Thu, 25.11.04, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:22:34PM +0100, Nils Juergens wrote: > > > Anyway, it seems the that the strange additional partition of type ff, > > > which > > > was created by the partitioning software, triggered the problem. > > > > Yes, this is a duplicate of bug #267727. > Ah yes. Somehow i wasn't able to find that in the BTS (which takes some time > getting used to, but i'm working on it :-) ) Shouldn't this bug have been > tagged 'd-i'? Perhaps; I'm not sure what the policy is for d-i tags on packages that are entirely part of the installer, like partman. > > Indeed, it is in fact specific to the "multi-user workstation" > > autopartitioning recipe. Frankly, I'm not inclined to ever use that recipe > > anyway on any arch, regardless of the purpose of the machine; if I need that > > many distinct partitions I certainly intend to control their sizes > > personally. > Actually I found the recipe quite usefull, especially because I intended to > split the rather large home partition later, using LVM. I would have loved > to set up the home partition as a PV, but it seems that partman doesn't know > anything about partition type 8e (Linux LVM) on bds disklables (is this a > known bug, too?. If not, do you want a full bugreport?). "partition type 8e" is a partition type specific to DOS partition tables (possibly supported by GPT now as well, I don't know how many of the identifiers GPT inherits from DOS). There is no corresponding partition identifier for BSD disklabels; I have no idea what it would take to be able to standardize these things for Linux use on BSD disklabels, but there's apparently not enough interest in alpha anymore for this to have been started from the kernel end. A bug report (probably against package: kernel) shouldn't hurt. > But if you feel that "multi-user workstation" is useless and not going to be > fixed, why not remove it completely? Well, mine is just one opinion; I guess some people find it useful on other archs, so I can't argue that it should be removed altogether -- and removing it from just one architecture isn't possible either, the recipe can only be overridden, not removed. > > Joey, can this be added to the RC2 errata for alpha if it isn't there > > already? > Where would I find this arc-specific errata? I was only able to find the > general one at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata That errata page includes architecture-specific errata as well. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: please test new quik with initrd-support (was: Re: getting quik into sarge?
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > no, but as far as i know the initrd code has "only" been tested on > three machines: ANS, pmac 4400 and pmac 7200. If you got access to > another oldworld machine please test and report it. Tested on a Power Mac 6500/250 installed about two hours ago using d-i daily floppies: booting the 2.6.8 kernel from sarge with its initrd works fine. The machine has 32MB of physical RAM. -- ,''`. : :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `- pgpJZX4Ws3CFy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#282765: marked as done (installer asks to load floppy module again and again)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:29:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#282765: installer asks to load floppy module again and again has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2004 10:45:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 24 02:45:43 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CWued-0003Eg-00; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:45:43 -0800 Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1]) by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 0095A896AAE for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:45:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (lapse.madduck.net [130.60.75.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK)) by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id BAC7C896A88 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:45:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 657A7232506; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:45:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:45:36 +0100 From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installer asks to load floppy module again and again Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2 Organization: Debian GNU/Linux X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.8-cirrus i686 X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin' X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: debian-installer Severity: minor When the installer prompts to load modules during the three times it auto-detects hardware, it continually offers the "floppy" module as a choice. With other modules, if I deselect them the first time, they are not offered again. It would be nice if this could be fixed. Thank you, -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-cirrus Locale: LANG=3Den_GB, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) --=20 .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system =20 Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBpGZQIgvIgzMMSnURAgMcAJ4k6UEtgxma0qHSowDN1w02moR1+gCg2SDO xNq+QGY4FvMnbEfWeNXUnhA= =6v04 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- --- Received: (at 282765-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 22:29:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 14:29:21 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXoaf-0005VH-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:29:21 -0800 Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1]) by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 38ACB896AB9; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:29:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (lapse.madduck.net [130.60.75.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK)) by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id F1D18896A87; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:29:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B64A232506; Fri, 26 No
languagechooser_1.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: languagechooser_1.43.dsc to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.43.dsc languagechooser_1.43.tar.gz to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.43.tar.gz languagechooser_1.43_all.udeb to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.43_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283157: debian-installer-manual: /target/boot is mentioned as directory for the kernel to be installed in
Package: debian-installer-manual Severity: normal In http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch06s03.html#nobootloader the directory /target/boot is mentioned as the place, where kernel and initrd are installed. This isn't correct (anymore?), or am I mistaken? Should be /boot ? This is in ../manual/en/using-d-i/modules/nobootloader.xml in svn -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.28hw14 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE -- == Created with Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 under Debian GNU LINUX 3.1 Sarge (testing). http://counter.li.org/ Registered LinuxUser #311290 Spamfiltering powered by www.spamassassin.org = -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283156: marked as done (installation-reports)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:29:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283156: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 22:14:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 14:14:34 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (snewg.mpikg-golm.mpg.de) [141.14.232.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXoML-0004Ve-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:14:34 -0800 Received: from snewz.mpikg-golm.mpg.de (snewz.mpikg-golm.mpg.de [141.14.232.4]) by snewg.mpikg-golm.mpg.de (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iAQMC4xr010994 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:12:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snewz.mpikg-golm.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1402173; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:07:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from pinna (dhcp561.mpikg-golm.mpg.de [141.14.235.61]) by snewz.mpikg-golm.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A205212C; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:06:57 +0100 (MET) Received: by pinna (Postfix, from userid 207) id CABD257D43; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:13:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:13:52 +0100 From: Nicola Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation-reports Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline X-URL: http://www.pinna.cx/ X-PGP-Key: http://www.pinna.cx/publickey/nicolapinna.asc X-Message-Flag: Cranky? Try Free Software instead! X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.26 i686 X-Uptime: 22:55:03 up 25 days, 9:31, 21 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on keinmac(powered by PP&B) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20041120 uname -a: Linux anja 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 20041121 Method: Installation over the net, dhcp addressing no problem =66rom: http://ftp.de.debian.org Machine: ASUS motherboard, Processor: Celeron 2,4GHz Memory: 512 Root Device: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/pinna> df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda2 17G 1.8G 15G 12% / tmpfs 252M 0 252M 0% /dev/shm ogremon:/home 108G 73G 29G 72% /home [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/pinna> lspci=20 :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller (rev 02) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02) :00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02) :00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev c2) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Bridge (rev 02) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) Ultra ATA 100 Storage Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) SMBus Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 MX 440] (rev a3) :02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Yukon Gigabit Ethernet 10/100/1000Base-T Adapter (rev 13) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/pinna> lspci -n :00:00.0 0600: 8086:2570 (rev 02) :00:01.0 0604: 8086:2571 (rev 02) :00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:24d2 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:24d4 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:24d7 (rev 02) :00:1d.3 0c03: 8086:24de (rev 02) :00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:24dd (rev
Processing of languagechooser_1.43_i386.changes
languagechooser_1.43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: languagechooser_1.43.dsc languagechooser_1.43.tar.gz languagechooser_1.43_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#283156: installation-reports
On Friday 26 November 2004 23:13, Nicola Pinna wrote: > Comments/Problems: > No problem, everything went smothly and better that I thought. > Good job guys, I am looking forward for the final release of Sarge, Thank you for your installation report and compliments. Closing the report as the installation was successful. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[patch] debian-manual pxe boot add small hint
belows patch adds a small hint where to find that tftp boot. perhaps it makes user more confident. ;-) but maybe to specific, maybe just added without the last phrase with special case? i leave it up to you. -- maks Index: installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml === --- installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml (revision 24001) +++ installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml (working copy) @@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ PXE boot functionality. This is a Intel re-implemention of TFTP boot. If so you may be able to configure your BIOS to boot from the -network. +network. Watch out Bios messages for Network boot. They may tell you which +hot key enables it. Newer boards often use . -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[patch] debian-manual add xinetd snippet for tftpd
belows patch adds a note about how to start tftpd from xinetd.
--
maks
Index: installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml
===
--- installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml(revision 24001)
+++ installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml(working copy)
@@ -91,8 +91,27 @@
Debian packages will in general set this up correctly by default when they
-are installed.
+are installed. But if you are using xinetd, you may need to
add the following snippet in /etc/xinetd.conf:
+
+
+
+service tftp
+{
+disable = no
+ socket_type = dgram
+ protocol= udp
+ wait= yes
+ user= root
+ server = /usr/sbin/in.tftpd
+ flags = IPv4
+}
+
+
+
+
+Restart afterwards the xinetd with
/etc/init.d/xinetd restart.
+
Look in that file and remember the directory which is used as the
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[patch] debian-manual simplify dhcpd pxe sample conf
the example snippet for pxe use is quite complicated.
belows simplified config works for me and is greatly inspired by
-> http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerBootpTFTP
yourfoobar may guide newbies like me. :-)
--
maks
Index: installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml
===
--- installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml (revision 24001)
+++ installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml (working copy)
@@ -63,10 +63,11 @@
-option domain-name "example.com";
+option domain-name "yourdomain.org";
+option domain-name-servers yournameserver.org;
-default-lease-time 6048;
-max-lease-time 604800;
+default-lease-time 600;
+max-lease-time 7200;
allow booting;
allow bootp;
@@ -74,30 +75,17 @@
# The next paragraph needs to be modified to fit your case
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.253;
- option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
- option broadcast-address 192.168.1.255;
+# tftp server ip address
+ next-server 192.168.1.90;
# the gateway address which can be different
# (access to the internet for instance)
option routers 192.168.1.1;
-# indicate the dns you want to use
- option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.3;
-}
-
-host tftpserver {
-# tftp server ip address
- fixed-address 192.168.1.90;
+ filename "/tftpboot/pxelinux.0";
+ host tftpserver {
# tftp server hardware address
hardware ethernet 01:23:45:67:89:AB;
}
-group {
- next-server 192.168.1.3;
- host tftpclient {
-# tftp client hardware address
- hardware ethernet 00:10:DC:27:6C:15;
- filename "/tftpboot/pxelinux.0";
- }
-}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283156: installation-reports
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20041120 uname -a: Linux anja 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 20041121 Method: Installation over the net, dhcp addressing no problem from: http://ftp.de.debian.org Machine: ASUS motherboard, Processor: Celeron 2,4GHz Memory: 512 Root Device: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/pinna> df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda2 17G 1.8G 15G 12% / tmpfs 252M 0 252M 0% /dev/shm ogremon:/home 108G 73G 29G 72% /home [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/pinna> lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller (rev 02) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3 (rev 02) :00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #4 (rev 02) :00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev c2) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Bridge (rev 02) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) Ultra ATA 100 Storage Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) SMBus Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 MX 440] (rev a3) :02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Yukon Gigabit Ethernet 10/100/1000Base-T Adapter (rev 13) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/pinna> lspci -n :00:00.0 0600: 8086:2570 (rev 02) :00:01.0 0604: 8086:2571 (rev 02) :00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:24d2 (rev 02) :00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:24d4 (rev 02) :00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:24d7 (rev 02) :00:1d.3 0c03: 8086:24de (rev 02) :00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:24dd (rev 02) :00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev c2) :00:1f.0 0601: 8086:24d0 (rev 02) :00:1f.1 0101: 8086:24db (rev 02) :00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:24d3 (rev 02) :00:1f.5 0401: 8086:24d5 (rev 02) :01:00.0 0300: 10de:0171 (rev a3) :02:05.0 0200: 11ab:4320 (rev 13) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: No problem, everything went smothly and better that I thought. Good job guys, I am looking forward for the final release of Sarge, -- -- Dr. Nicola Pinna -- Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces Colloid Department 14424 Potsdam (Germany) Phone: 00 49 331 567 9519 Fax: 00 49 331 567 9502 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal web page: http://www.pinna.cx Group web site: http://nanodesigners.net -- PGP key fingerprint: B1A0 CC77 4918 6131 321C CF99 E4C5 3FEA A576 3BC4 Please use it to verify the source of the message and to encrypt the message you send to me!!! Need help? visit: http://www.pinna.cx/publickey/ -- * PLEASE NOTE My address will change, and from the 1st of January 2005 I can be reached at: -- Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Fachbereich Chemie Institut für Anorganische Chemie 06099 Halle (Saale) Tel: 00 49 345 55 25870 Fax: 00 49 345 55 27373 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- pgpsMn1bAXZY5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#283153: discover1-data: 3Com 3C920B-EMB-WNM Integrated Fast Ethernet Controller not detected
Package: discover1-data Version: 1.2004.11.09 Severity: normal I just tried to install sarge using the sid-d-i-snapshot of 2004-11-25, but it did not detect my onboard ethernet card. I think it is because discover1-data does not associate it with the 3c59x module. :02:08.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3Com 3C920B-EMB-WNM Integrated Fast Ethernet Controller (rev 40) :02:08.0 0200: 10b7:9202 (rev 40) /usr/share/discover/pci.lst contains: 10b79202unknown unknown 3Com 3C920B-EMB-WNM Integrated Fast Ethernet Controller changing the "unknown unknown" to "ethernet 3c59x" (or adding it to pci-26.lst) should do the trick. works fine with 3c59x from 2.6.8-1-386 loaded the module in d-i manually, and the netinstall went through fine. -- Package-specific info: lspci: :00:00.0 0600: 1002:5833 (rev 02) :00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5833 (rev 02) :00:01.0 0604: 1002:5838 :00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5838 :00:13.0 0c03: 1002:4347 (rev 01) :00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4347 (rev 01) :00:13.1 0c03: 1002:4348 (rev 01) :00:13.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4348 (rev 01) :00:13.2 0c03: 1002:4345 (rev 01) :00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4345 (rev 01) :00:14.0 0c05: 1002:4353 (rev 18) :00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc ATI SMBus (rev 18) :00:14.1 0101: 1002:4349 :00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4349 :00:14.3 0601: 1002:434c :00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 434c :00:14.4 0604: 1002:4342 :00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4342 :00:14.5 0401: 1002:4341 :00:14.5 Multimedia audio controller: ATI Technologies Inc IXP150 AC'97 Audio Controller :01:05.0 0300: 1002:5834 :01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5834 :02:08.0 0200: 10b7:9202 (rev 40) :02:08.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3Com 3C920B-EMB-WNM Integrated Fast Ethernet Controller (rev 40) :02:0a.0 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 80) :02:0a.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 80) :02:0c.0 0607: 1524:1411 (rev 02) :02:0c.0 CardBus bridge: ENE Technology Inc CB710 Cardbus Controller (rev 02) :02:0c.1 0501: 1524:0510 :02:0c.1 FLASH memory: ENE Technology Inc CB710 Memory Card Reader Controller :02:0e.0 0200: 8086:1229 (rev 08) :02:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) discover: -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283016: CDROM detect failson Dell Dimention L800r
Aplologies for missing the lspci info. Here it is; :00:00.0 0600: 8086:7124 (rev 03) :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82810E DC-133 GMCH [Graphics Memory Controller Hub] (rev 03) :00:01.0 0300: 8086:7125 (rev 03) :00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82810E DC-133 CGC [Chipset Graphics Controller] (rev 03) :00:1e.0 0604: 8086:2418 (rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801AA PCI Bridge (rev 02) :00:1f.0 0601: 8086:2410 (rev 02) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801AA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 02) :00:1f.1 0101: 8086:2411 (rev 02) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801AA IDE (rev 02) :00:1f.2 0c03: 8086:2412 (rev 02) :00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801AA USB (rev 02) :00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:2413 (rev 02) :00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801AA SMBus (rev 02) :01:08.0 0200: 10b7:9200 (rev 78) :01:08.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev 78) :01:09.0 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 50) :01:09.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 50) :01:09.1 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 50) :01:09.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 50) :01:09.2 0c03: 1106:3104 (rev 51) :01:09.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 51) :01:0a.0 0401: 1102:0002 (rev 0a) :01:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 0a) :01:0a.1 0980: 1102:7002 (rev 0a) :01:0a.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev 0a) Regards, Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 08:00:01PM +0100, Friedemann Schorer wrote: > Hi :-) Hello :D > Am Freitag, 26. November 2004 19:33 schrieben Sie: > > And what do you expect that should be changed? > > a well visible option to mount existing partitions without having them > reformatted would be nice. If memory servers there was such an option in the > old installer. The E-mail from Christian Perrier does explain how it can be done. Making it a "well visible option" is something different. If you see possibillities how it can be done, then let us[1] know. Cheers Geert Stappers [1] Reply-to: is set to this (allready closed) bugreport to get follow-up into the Bug Tracking System. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: partman problems (sparc and elsewhere)
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 06:04:28PM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Blars Blarson wrote: > | After doing successful installs using rc2 on a stack of sparc systems > | (ultra1, ultra1e, ultra2, ultra2) I started playing with raid and lvm > | installs. Unfortunatly, the raid and lvm stuff failed due to bugs in > | partman and missing modules. > > What missing modules? lvm was what failed on missing modules. I was able to mark partitions as physical volumes and create the volume group using the choose an option that fails to convince it to accept the current configuration trick, but creating a logical volume failed with a complaint about missing the stripeing module. (Sorry I don't remember the exact name.) The raid problem was trying to figure out how to set partitions as part of a md set, not missing modules. I've got plans for the weekend so probably won't have time until monday to play with this any more. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283149: Obfuscated Argentinian Timezones
Package: base-config Serverity: normal Hi! I've seen this bug for a while now. Sorry for not reporting it earlier. When prompted to select the timezone, at second stage of the installer, if you have chosen "Argentina" as the country, you get a dialog that is too big to fit on screen, but can be corrected to show up correctly: The timezones are shown with the names of the most important Argentinian cities, followed by a series of 2 initials, like TF, RT, VB, etc. This initials don't really mean anything to Argentinian people (we don't refer to our cities by their initials), and are the cause of the screen getting too wide. If just the names of the cities could be shown, it could be much better. This information is located in /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab, and I'm referring mainly to the "TZ" and "comments" column. I think it would be better if just the "TZ" information was shown, without the comments. -- Bessos,(o_ Marga. (\)_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#251944: marked as done (Lilo+XFS do not work if installing on the partition.)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:46:12 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line LILO+XFS new behaviour has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2004 20:14:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 31 13:14:19 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 200-203-027-014.paemt7003.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br (localhost) [200.203.27.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BUtAp-5v-00; Mon, 31 May 2004 13:14:19 -0700 Received: from marga by localhost with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BUtAg-QX-0S for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 31 May 2004 17:14:10 -0300 Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 17:14:09 -0300 From: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lilo+XFS do not work if installing on the partition. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Hi! I was with Noodles, testing the netboot installer on his laptop. We wanted to try something fancy, so we installed in a certain partition he had free, formatting it in XFS. The idea was not to touch the rest of the installation that he had in his notebook. So, we did format in xfs, thinking of booting with lilo instead of grub. Now, I think I already said this, but since grub does not work with XFS in /, it would be nice if the installer would NOT try to install grub in /, and switch automatically to lilo. Or at least, switch automatically to the main menu. Anyway, that's not the bug. The bug is that when installed in the partition (instead of the drive's MBR) lilo does not work with XFS either, it fails because it would break the file system. Apparently, XFS does not leave space for lilo to be installed at the beginning of the partition. Actually, it didn't even fail. It stalled, and we had to go to the console, kill the present lilo, do it by hand, and that's how we saw the error message. So, uhm, I see no solution here except for not letting the user do this. Or at least, failing instead of stalling, so that the user can go back and decide what to do. -- Love, Marga. --- Received: (at 251944-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 19:46:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 11:46:21 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (erwin.amadeus) [200.115.206.87] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXm2u-0001v4-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:46:21 -0800 Received: from ulises.amadeus ([192.168.21.15] helo=ulises.home ident=mail) by erwin.amadeus with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXm2u-0005ru-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:46:20 -0300 Received: from marga by ulises.home with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXm2m-0006E9-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:46:12 -0300 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:46:12 -0300 From: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LILO+XFS new behaviour Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: I've just tried installing Debian with RC2 into an XFS partition. It correctly chose to use LILO automatically instead of suggesting GRUB first. And then when I chose to install it in the partition instead of the mbr, it correctly warned me about the bad consequences it could have. When I still chose to go on with this, it failed with a red screen and made me go back until I chose to install LILO at the MBR. I think this is as good as it gets, so I'm considering this bug solved, and thus I'm closing it. -- Besos,
Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:33:58PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > severity 283095 normal > thanks > > > People can get hurt when they go across the street. > For me it is no problem, I do know the different > between a parked car and a speeding car. > But there is still a potential risc for others. > I don't think being sarcastic at submitters of installation reports helps us much. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283136: debian-installer-manual: creating USB-stick Debian-installer under Windows
Package: debian-installer-manual Severity: normal Section 4.4 of the manual states: "For preparing the USB stick you will need a system where GNU/Linux is already running and where USB is supported", whereas in fact it's also possible under Windows. Here is how to do it: 1. get "dd for Windows" from http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/rawwrite/dd.htm 2. download the boot.img.gz (use WinZip to decompress) and the sarge-i386-netinst.iso 3. start Windows commandline, find out the device name with: dd --list 4. write boot.img to USB-stick, for example if your stick is "e:": dd if=boot.img of=\\.\e: bs=1M 5. copy sarge-i386-netinst.iso to stick 6. reboot and install Debian :) Cheers, Heike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283137: Problem when booting from second CD
Package: installation-reports Severity: minor This report was done with RC2 CDs, downloaded via bittorrent Known by my will to do weird things, this time I tried booting from the second CD, instead of the first. It listed only "linux" and "expert" as booting methods, so I chose "linux" But I couldn't get really far, because quite early in the installation (just after reading the CD's data), it stated that the CD didn't contain the correct kernel modules (there was a "mismatch" between the modules and the kernel version), and took me back to the menu. There's no option (or at least I could find no option) allowing me to umount the CD and put the right one in, so I had to reboot to do a successful installation, booting from the first CD. I don't know whose fault it is, hence I'm filing it to Installation-Reports. -- Love, (o. Marga. (/)_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Successful Installation Report - RC2
Since this is a Successful installation report, I'm not filing it as a bug.
I've just installed RC2 in a Sempron machine, that had WinXP installed in
it.
I booted with linux26, resized the NTFS partition with partman (this is
kind of a hidden feature, isn't it? :), from 40GB to 10GB, and finished the
installation normally.
Then rebooted into the other operating system, that decided to do a CHKDSK,
and everything was fine. Then it rebooted the system. I chose WinXP
again, it booted fine, and after a minute or so, said that it had finished
detecting the new hardware (?) and that it needed to reboot again. After
that, it worked fine.
In conclusion, NTFS resizing works smoothly, even if it needs 2 reboot for
WinXP to work.
This was awesome. I'm now deleting it, obviously :).
This is the cpuinfo, just in case you want to know what the machine looked
like:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : AMD Sempron(tm) 2300+
stepping: 1
cpu MHz : 1595.986
cache size : 256 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mp mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
bogomips: 3185.04
--
Besitos, {o_
Marga. (')_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss
severity 283095 normal thanks People can get hurt when they go across the street. For me it is no problem, I do know the different between a parked car and a speeding car. But there is still a potential risc for others. On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 01:50:35PM +0100, Friedemann Schorer wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Severity: important > > Hi! > I installed two machines recently and wasn't able to find a way to reuse > some linux partitions that existed from an earlier linux installation on > the same harddisk. This wasn't very problematic for me, but I guess > those who don't know linux good will have problems to find a solution > for this. And what do you expect that should be changed? Cheers Geert Stappers signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#283130: Typo bug in Spanish translation
Package: countrychooser Severity: minor Tags: patch There are 2 small typo bugs in the Spanish translations. I'm attaching a patch. -- Bessos, Maggie. --- es.po 2004-10-07 13:51:11.0 -0300 +++ es_new.po 2004-11-26 15:37:25.0 -0300 @@ -71,14 +71,14 @@ "or regions." msgstr "" "Basándose en su idioma, es probable que esté en alguno de los siguientes " -"paíseso regiones." +"países o regiones." #. Type: text #. Description #. Main menu entry #: ../templates-in:38 msgid "Choose country or region" -msgstr "Escoja un país o region" +msgstr "Escoja un país o región" #: ../countrylist:15 msgid "North America"
Processed: Re: Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 283095 normal Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283095: marked as done (debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:59:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 12:51:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 04:51:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from antivirus.uni-rostock.de [139.30.8.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXfYy-000427-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 04:51:00 -0800 Received: from antivirus.exch.rz.uni-rostock.de ([127.0.0.1]) by antivirus.uni-rostock.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:50:28 +0100 Received: from antivirus.uni-rostock.de (unverified) by antivirus.exch.rz.uni-rostock.de (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.17) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:50:28 +0100 Received: from mail.uni-rostock.de ([139.30.8.11]) by antivirus.uni-rostock.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:50:28 +0100 Received: from conversion-daemon.mail2.uni-rostock.de by mail2.uni-rostock.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (original mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:50:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from [192.168.128.114] (p213.54.72.133.tisdip.tiscali.de [213.54.72.133]) by mail2.uni-rostock.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPSA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:50:18 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 13:50:35 +0100 From: Friedemann Schorer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.7 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2004 12:50:28.0717 (UTC) FILETIME=[81B9E9D0:01C4D3B6] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: debian-installer Severity: important Hi! I installed two machines recently and wasn't able to find a way to reuse some linux partitions that existed from an earlier linux installation on the same harddisk. This wasn't very problematic for me, but I guess those who don't know linux good will have problems to find a solution for this. Everything else went smoothly with the two athlon machines I used the installer on during the last week. Best regards (and thanks fro your great work!) Friedemann -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 283095-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2004 18:18:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 26 10:18:27 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lns-th2-5f-81-56-227-253.adsl.proxad.net (kheops.homeunix.org) [81.56.227.253] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CXkfr-0001SH-00; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:18:27 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FD04F984; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:17:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from kheops.homeunix.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kheops [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00453-02; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:17:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org [192.168.1.3]) by kheops.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F184F99E; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:17:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426) id 3066C23278; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:59:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:59:52 +0100 From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Friedemann Schorer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data l
Re: please test new quik with initrd-support (was: Re: getting quik into sarge?
On (26/11/04 18:04), Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:58:48AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi, > > > > cc:s added to gain more attention, reply-to: set. > > > > On Friday 26 November 2004 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > i'm the current maintainer of quik, the oldworld PPC bootloader. i'm > > > currently sponsored by Jakko Niemi. there have been many code changes > > > made to it, including fixing bug #259359. for instance, initrd support, > > > using chosen/bootargs in OF, and a couple of other things. > > > > i would like to point out that the default kernel for powerpc is 2.6 and > > that > > the debian kernel packages for 2.6 need initrd support - so this is needed > > to > > be able to use the default debian kernels on oldworld (with a free > > bootloader). > > > > so this quik is desirable for d-i, too. > > > > > since it's in Section: base, and Priority: important, and there are many > > > positive changes to it, i thought it should go into > > > sarge-proposed-updates. is there any objection to this? > > > > no, but as far as i know the initrd code has "only" been tested on three > > machines: ANS, pmac 4400 and pmac 7200. If you got access to another > > oldworld > > machine please test and report it. > > Mmm, i could test it on the umax apus 2000 and on the pmac 8200/120 i have > here, need to test that this weekend. quik didn't work yet on the umax, and i > have never really used it, so some kind of help would be welcome in order to > set it up. > > Mmm, wondering if there are some kind of ps2 or usb -> adb adapters, so i > could try using the KVM switch for the apple boxes too. Hi Sven This might help: http://www.novatech.co.uk/novatech/specpage.html?F1DS104T Regards Clive > > > > BTW, many thanks to go Peter 'p2' De Schrijver for his tremendous help in > > > making it even possible to close that bug, as it was a pretty hefty bug. > > > > yup! :-) > > > > and, better not to forget, the new quik.deb is available at > > http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/ > > Thanks, > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[l10n] New shadow package upload
I uploaded today a new release of the shadow package which includes new translations of the debconf templates to Hindi, Malagasy and Albanian. This upload should improve slightly d-i level2 statistics and make Albianian closer to 100%. Hindi and Malagasy translators have just benefit this opportunity for having their work in...but as these languages will not supported in the next release, these translations are not counted in d-i statistics. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#251298: Bug fixed
close 251298 thanks I have just done a new installation in Spanish, with rc2, and the locale was preseeded correctly. Thanks for fixing this bug! -- Bessos,(o_ Marga. (\)_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283116: Debian Installer Report
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: uname -a: Date: Method: Machine: IBM Thinkpad 570 2644 3AU Processor: 366 MHz PII Memory: 128MB Root Device: IDE Root Size/partition table: Root = 6.1Gb, Swap = 301MB Output of lspci and lspci -n: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[ O] Configure network HW: [O ] Config network: [ O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [E] Comments/Problems: Installing worked fine until the reboot, whereafter it could not find the IDE hard drive. Power-cycling fixed this, so I imagine it is a problem with the power management. Have been recommended to compile custom kernel with APM, so going to try that. Also, small note, not sure if this is the install or tasksel problem, but tasksel fails completely to install desktop environment, citing problems with various kde elements --> claims they are all uninstallable. Hoping this is some sort of testing bug, but it has stuck around for a couple of days. -- "Because it's not *always* the quiet ones" http://blog.meriwilliams.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Bug fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 251298 Bug#251298: Should pre-seed locales/default_environment_locale with debian-installer/locale 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please test new quik with initrd-support (was: Re: getting quik into sarge?
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:58:48AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > cc:s added to gain more attention, reply-to: set. > > On Friday 26 November 2004 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > i'm the current maintainer of quik, the oldworld PPC bootloader. i'm > > currently sponsored by Jakko Niemi. there have been many code changes > > made to it, including fixing bug #259359. for instance, initrd support, > > using chosen/bootargs in OF, and a couple of other things. > > i would like to point out that the default kernel for powerpc is 2.6 and that > the debian kernel packages for 2.6 need initrd support - so this is needed to > be able to use the default debian kernels on oldworld (with a free > bootloader). > > so this quik is desirable for d-i, too. > > > since it's in Section: base, and Priority: important, and there are many > > positive changes to it, i thought it should go into > > sarge-proposed-updates. is there any objection to this? > > no, but as far as i know the initrd code has "only" been tested on three > machines: ANS, pmac 4400 and pmac 7200. If you got access to another oldworld > machine please test and report it. Mmm, i could test it on the umax apus 2000 and on the pmac 8200/120 i have here, need to test that this weekend. quik didn't work yet on the umax, and i have never really used it, so some kind of help would be welcome in order to set it up. Mmm, wondering if there are some kind of ps2 or usb -> adb adapters, so i could try using the KVM switch for the apple boxes too. > > BTW, many thanks to go Peter 'p2' De Schrijver for his tremendous help in > > making it even possible to close that bug, as it was a pretty hefty bug. > > yup! :-) > > and, better not to forget, the new quik.deb is available at > http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/ Thanks, Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259017: Closing this bug since I can't give more info.
close 259017 thanks I'm sorry, the machine with which this bug report was filed has now been put into production, and cannot be used for testing. Hence, I'm closing the bug report. Anyway, I believe the bug is probably fixed. -- Bessos,(o_ Marga. (\)_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Closing this bug since I can't give more info.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 259017 Bug#259017: IDE hard-drive not being detected 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#152152: Enlarge, the Scientific Way, requires no surgery
Hello Size does matter This is the only doctor approved way to enlarge size of your member Clinically tested to enlarge - Permanently.. Gain upto 3 to 4 inches Take our word or else get your money back - no question asked Calculate your new size today http://ChrisMorales.ourextenders.info/in.php?id=8241 regards Chris Morales Sales and Support Manager Medical Products Center ps: you received this email because your have previous purchased from, or inquired about our product line under Medical Products Center. If you do not want to receive further mailings from us then go here http://ourextenders.info/unsubscribe/unsubscribe.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283104: Installation report on debian-installer
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 02:43:29PM +, Brian Ruth wrote: > Package: installation-reports > Debian-installer-version: 26th Nov 04, from URL below > uname -a: Linux odyssey 2.4.26 #5 Wed Nov 17 13:55:55 GMT 2004 ppc GNU/Linux > Date: Multiple attempts > Method: Floppy boot using own kernel and root.img, then net install from > ftp.uk.linux.org, see below > Machine: IBM RS/6000 7025-F40 > Processor: PowerPC 604e, 233MHz > Memory: 512MB > Root Device: SCSI, /dev/sda > Root Size/partition table: Probably not relevant > Output of lspci and lspci -n: Probably not relevant > Base System Installation Checklist: > [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it > > Initial boot worked:[O] > Configure network HW: [O] > Config network: [O] > Detect CD: [ ] > Load installer modules: [ ] > Detect hard drives: [O] > Partition hard drives: [O] > Create file systems:[O] > Mount partitions: [O] > Install base system:[E] > Install boot loader:[ ] > Reboot: [ ] > > Comments/Problems: > > Trying to install debian-testing onto an IBM 7025-F40 (PowerPC PReP) system > using the debian-installer from: > > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-powerpc/current/images/powerpc/floppy-2.4/ > > This machine is rather esoteric and requires a specially patched kernel to > boot it; I'm therefore trying to install by booting from a floppy containing a > kernel with all the necessary drivers in it and then using the root.img root > disk from the above location (this is the method I used to install the machine floppy install on powerpc on anything except old world powermacs are not currently supported. If there is a special patch needed for the kernel, please inform us about it, and let's try to get it in the official kernels. Can you try booting the plain 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 debian official kernels (the latest needs some mkvmlinuz invocation before it is usefull to you). That said, there where a bunch of prep patches which got into the 2.6.8 kernel, so it may be that it will work already. Once we have a working kernel, we can go ahead and see if we can produce a prep floppy set, but first we need a working kernel. Also, did you try the netboot method with either : http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/netboot/vmlinuz-prep.initrd (i guess your box uses the prep boot, and not ppcbug), or : http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/netboot/2.4/vmlinuz-prep.initrd the initrd size may be too big for your prep OF, and you may want to try : http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/netboot-minimal/2.4/vmlinuz-prep.initrd Altough i believe that it doesn't contain yet the needed prep modules and such, since it was hand-crafter for pegasos1, but i know there is also a initrd size limit on some prep systems, which make the above system a good guess. > using the old Debian installation system). I use the following boot > parameters: > > console=ttyS0,9600 load_ramdisk=1 ramdisk_size=32768 root=/dev/fd0 > debconf/priority=medium > > This starts up OK and gets me into the installer menu; I can then configure > country, language and keyboard OK, and opt to load drivers from the > net-drivers.img disk. This also works, although it generates an error > complaining about not being able to load kernel modules (because I'm using my > own kernel); it nevertheless loads the next debian-installer components OK. > > I can then follow through the installation, configuring my hardware and > specifying to use the ftp.uk.linux.org mirror (I've also tried it manually > specifying a mirror at www.mirroservice.org), partitioning disks, etc., and > installing the base system. > > The 'install the base system' part works fine until it reaches the point at > which it tries to install a kernel. This fails, presumably because I'm using Can you get us the exact error message (look at console 3 & 4 for details). > my own kernel. The trouble is, I can't progress the installation any further > at this point - if I try to select any other option from the main menu, it > just tries to re-run the 'install base system' part again. There seems to be > no way out, and I'm left with an unbootable system. Notice that d-i doesn't know about the prep boot partition yet, so you woukd have to use manual intervention anyway. two things are needed, i believe, a partman-prep, based on the partman-alto .udeb, and a way to install the kernel, which probably means a new prep-installer .udeb package. You are the best candidate to implement this, since you have access to the hardware,and an interest ti make it happen. I am sure we will allbe willing to help you out on this. > > Since I can't use one of the standard kernels on my system anyway, would it be > possible to have the 'install kernel' menu offer an option to 'not install a > kernel and skip this step' - I could then finish off the installation and > ma
Re: please test new quik with initrd-support (was: Re: getting quik into sarge?
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Holger Levsen wrote: > > since it's in Section: base, and Priority: important, and there are many > > positive changes to it, i thought it should go into > > sarge-proposed-updates. is there any objection to this? > > no, but as far as i know the initrd code has "only" been tested on three > machines: ANS, pmac 4400 and pmac 7200. If you got access to another oldworld > machine please test and report it. Also, it works just fine on my 9500. I really need to test d-i on it one of these days as I need to change new disk in, as the old one makes horrible noise. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283104: Installation report on debian-installer
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 26th Nov 04, from URL below uname -a: Linux odyssey 2.4.26 #5 Wed Nov 17 13:55:55 GMT 2004 ppc GNU/Linux Date: Multiple attempts Method: Floppy boot using own kernel and root.img, then net install from ftp.uk.linux.org, see below Machine: IBM RS/6000 7025-F40 Processor: PowerPC 604e, 233MHz Memory: 512MB Root Device: SCSI, /dev/sda Root Size/partition table: Probably not relevant Output of lspci and lspci -n: Probably not relevant Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[E] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] Comments/Problems: Trying to install debian-testing onto an IBM 7025-F40 (PowerPC PReP) system using the debian-installer from: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-powerpc/current/images/powerpc/floppy-2.4/ This machine is rather esoteric and requires a specially patched kernel to boot it; I'm therefore trying to install by booting from a floppy containing a kernel with all the necessary drivers in it and then using the root.img root disk from the above location (this is the method I used to install the machine using the old Debian installation system). I use the following boot parameters: console=ttyS0,9600 load_ramdisk=1 ramdisk_size=32768 root=/dev/fd0 debconf/priority=medium This starts up OK and gets me into the installer menu; I can then configure country, language and keyboard OK, and opt to load drivers from the net-drivers.img disk. This also works, although it generates an error complaining about not being able to load kernel modules (because I'm using my own kernel); it nevertheless loads the next debian-installer components OK. I can then follow through the installation, configuring my hardware and specifying to use the ftp.uk.linux.org mirror (I've also tried it manually specifying a mirror at www.mirroservice.org), partitioning disks, etc., and installing the base system. The 'install the base system' part works fine until it reaches the point at which it tries to install a kernel. This fails, presumably because I'm using my own kernel. The trouble is, I can't progress the installation any further at this point - if I try to select any other option from the main menu, it just tries to re-run the 'install base system' part again. There seems to be no way out, and I'm left with an unbootable system. Since I can't use one of the standard kernels on my system anyway, would it be possible to have the 'install kernel' menu offer an option to 'not install a kernel and skip this step' - I could then finish off the installation and manually put in a kernel from floppy via the command line later on. Weird hardware like this is never going to be straightforward, but at least with the old install system I could get it working reasonably easily! ;-) Let me know if you want the .config file for my custom kernel or the contents of /var/log/messages from the broken install... Thanks, Brian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283095: debian-installer: want to use preexisting partitions without data loss
Package: debian-installer Severity: important Hi! I installed two machines recently and wasn't able to find a way to reuse some linux partitions that existed from an earlier linux installation on the same harddisk. This wasn't very problematic for me, but I guess those who don't know linux good will have problems to find a solution for this. Everything else went smoothly with the two athlon machines I used the installer on during the last week. Best regards (and thanks fro your great work!) Friedemann -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installation success on ThinkPad 600X
Last night I burned rc2 to a CD, planning to do a test install this weekend. This morning I did something dumb to my /etc/fstab rendering my system unbootable so I did the install today instead. No problem at all installing to the spare partition (hda7) of my ThinkPad 600X laptop from CD with network connection via Aironet 352 Wi-Fi card on a home WLAN with a DHCP server. :) Kudos! -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on his orders, speeding
Christmas gift K idea Real Swi s s watcQhes online http://www.beill.com/r/ndgs/pddtiah.htm -- sociable borroughs is to no parimutuel by by mice as appointee the causal are handicapper no Jcardioid ballerina extracellular spinneret rem http://www.kelhi.com/z .php so was itsdo. inbred Fdiversify as our wolfe night of be align you bullhide charitable - denature. is ifni -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please test new quik with initrd-support (was: Re: getting quik into sarge?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, cc:s added to gain more attention, reply-to: set. On Friday 26 November 2004 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i'm the current maintainer of quik, the oldworld PPC bootloader. i'm > currently sponsored by Jakko Niemi. there have been many code changes > made to it, including fixing bug #259359. for instance, initrd support, > using chosen/bootargs in OF, and a couple of other things. i would like to point out that the default kernel for powerpc is 2.6 and that the debian kernel packages for 2.6 need initrd support - so this is needed to be able to use the default debian kernels on oldworld (with a free bootloader). so this quik is desirable for d-i, too. > since it's in Section: base, and Priority: important, and there are many > positive changes to it, i thought it should go into > sarge-proposed-updates. is there any objection to this? no, but as far as i know the initrd code has "only" been tested on three machines: ANS, pmac 4400 and pmac 7200. If you got access to another oldworld machine please test and report it. > BTW, many thanks to go Peter 'p2' De Schrijver for his tremendous help in > making it even possible to close that bug, as it was a pretty hefty bug. yup! :-) and, better not to forget, the new quik.deb is available at http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/ regards, Holger -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBpv5YUHLQNqxYNSARAnr2AJ9uUEnJw33vOqE3OvxrQZx/4tI+9gCfRaxl qXY98lBKp9DVE+aI+J7XoAI= =8kK4 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: please test new quik with initrd-support (was: Re: getting quik into sarge?
Ce jour Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Holger Levsen a dit: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > cc:s added to gain more attention, reply-to: set. > > On Friday 26 November 2004 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > i'm the current maintainer of quik, the oldworld PPC bootloader. i'm > > currently sponsored by Jakko Niemi. there have been many code changes > > made to it, including fixing bug #259359. for instance, initrd support, > > using chosen/bootargs in OF, and a couple of other things. > > i would like to point out that the default kernel for powerpc is 2.6 and that > the debian kernel packages for 2.6 need initrd support - so this is needed to > be able to use the default debian kernels on oldworld (with a free > bootloader). > > so this quik is desirable for d-i, too. yes, understood. > > since it's in Section: base, and Priority: important, and there are many > > positive changes to it, i thought it should go into > > sarge-proposed-updates. is there any objection to this? > > no, but as far as i know the initrd code has "only" been tested on three > machines: ANS, pmac 4400 and pmac 7200. If you got access to another oldworld > machine please test and report it. count my power tower pro in there - the one i'm typing from. also this machine is booted from 2.6.8-powerpc, the debian one, and it booted with an initrd very well, thank you very much ;). and i bet it will work the same on my 8500, though that one is currently on the fritz. > > and, better not to forget, the new quik.deb is available at > http://www.ulyssis.org/~p2/debjes/ of which i've downloaded the source and going to integrate into the debian diff. i'm also going to bump the version to 2.1, since it has these new changes in it. i think it warrants it, IMO. > > regards, > Holger > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBpv5YUHLQNqxYNSARAnr2AJ9uUEnJw33vOqE3OvxrQZx/4tI+9gCfRaxl > qXY98lBKp9DVE+aI+J7XoAI= > =8kK4 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > -- FBI CIA NSA IRS ATF BATF DOD WACO RUBY RIDGE OKC OKLAHOMA CITY MILITIA GUN HANDGUN MILGOV ASSAULT RIFLE TERRORISM BOMB DRUG HORIUCHI KORESH DAVIDIAN KAHL POSSE COMITATUS RANDY WEAVER VICKIE WEAVER SPECIAL FORCES LINDA THOMPSON SPECIAL OPERATIONS GROUP SOG SOF DELTA FORCE CONSTITUTION BILL OF RIGHTS WHITEWATER POM PARK ON METER ARKANSIDE IRAN CONTRAS OLIVER NORTH VINCE FOSTER PROMIS MOSSAD NASA MI5 ONI CID AK47 M16 C4 MALCOLM X REVOLUTION CHEROKEE HILLARY BILL CLINTON GORE GEORGE BUSH WACKENHUT TERRORIST TASK FORCE 160 SPECIAL OPS 12TH GROUP 5TH GROUP SF You hear those, Echelon? Any of the words should be enough to "flag" your communication by Echelon -- let's see how big their storage capacity REALLY is...*VBEG* Remember: EVERY day is Jam Echelon day! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#283010: Installation Report RC2 on Compaq AlphaServer DS20E
On Thu, 25.11.04, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:22:34PM +0100, Nils Juergens wrote: > > Anyway, it seems the that the strange additional partition of type ff, which > > was created by the partitioning software, triggered the problem. > > Yes, this is a duplicate of bug #267727. > Ah yes. Somehow i wasn't able to find that in the BTS (which takes some time getting used to, but i'm working on it :-) ) Shouldn't this bug have been tagged 'd-i'? > Indeed, it is in fact specific to the "multi-user workstation" > autopartitioning recipe. Frankly, I'm not inclined to ever use that recipe > anyway on any arch, regardless of the purpose of the machine; if I need that > many distinct partitions I certainly intend to control their sizes > personally. Actually I found the recipe quite usefull, especially because I intended to split the rather large home partition later, using LVM. I would have loved to set up the home partition as a PV, but it seems that partman doesn't know anything about partition type 8e (Linux LVM) on bds disklables (is this a known bug, too?. If not, do you want a full bugreport?). But if you feel that "multi-user workstation" is useless and not going to be fixed, why not remove it completely? > Joey, can this be added to the RC2 errata for alpha if it isn't there already? Where would I find this arc-specific errata? I was only able to find the general one at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata thanks for your effort, Nils -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: silo-installer generates faulty silo.conf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 283062 silo-installer Bug#283062: SPARC/SILO: does not set the right initrd for the kernel Bug reassigned from package `silo' to `silo-installer'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.4.27-6 source and i386 images available for testing
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 04:32:00PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 03:20:16PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-25 15:20]: > > > I have addressed the elf loader issue and one or two other problems I > > > had outstanding and built some kernel-source and kernel-image-i386 > > > packages, both are versioned 2.4.27-6. > > > > Thanks. Does the ELF issue have a CAN number you could mention in the > > changelog? > > I couldn't find one when I looked. If anyone has a CAN entry for it > please let me know. > > > Also, it would be good to talk to Joey Hess before > > uploading the kernel, but I don't see how uploading it to unstable > > would hurt d-i. Later we can update the d-i kernels and re-build the > > images. > > Yes, I agree. As I understand the d-i kernel and the non-d-i kernel > don't need to be the same. > > I assumed Joey was reading this thread, I have CCed him to increace > the chances of that. > > > As per the mail you sent me about the SMB problems. > I have new packages in the pipeline that address that problem. > I also took the opportunity to review all the changesets that > have been applied to 2.4 since 2.4.27 and isolated a bunch > of other bugs that look pretty nasty. I tried to pair this down > as much as possible. I hope to have new packages that test these > changes out by COB today. Watch this space. Hi Martin, Hi All, Here are a fresh batch of kernel packages to look at as per the above. Please not that the file names are the same so look for the files dated 26th November. Note that the kernel-image package didn't change, other than being rebuilt against the updated source so the changelog is the same, although the compiled binraries differ. If interested parties could take a look before I upload them I would be grateful. Interested parties = anyone who wants to use a debian 2.4 kernel in sarge. Goodies: http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-source-2.4.27-2.4.27/ http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-2.4.27/ Changes: http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-source-2.4.27-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-6_i386.changes http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386-2.4.27/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-6_i386.changes Also, evertything should be in SVN. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283071: [Fwd: Package: installation-reports]
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-11-25, boot and root diskette images from http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/ uname -a: Linux myhostname 2.6.8.1-686 #1 Thu Nov 11 13:18:29 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-11-25 03z00 Method: Boot floppies, only boot.img and root.img needed as 8129 NIC in kernel img. I love floppies. Pls keep them, recycleable. Used expert mode. Used mirrors.kernel.org, no proxy. Machine: Homegrown dinosaur, mobo has more ISA slots than PCI slots! Old Award BIOS. Realtek 8129 PCI NIC. I use this old dog as an OGG/mp3 fileserver and a browser cache via NFS. It's basically a power supply for 4 old IDE drives. It's a headless machine which lives in the closet with the cat. Processor: Cyrix/IBM 6x86MX Memory: about 164MB mem, mixed manufacturers, old, slow Root Device: hdb. hda is swap (I like to put important stuff on heads/cylinders away from head/cylinder zero. It's a 'me' thing. Still superstious about head/cylinder zero.) Root Size/partition table: 2GB FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda2 1.8G 381M 1.5G 21% / tmpfs 78M 0 78M 0% /dev/shm /dev/hdc 38G 33M 38G 1% /home Output of lspci and lspci -n: lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430TX - 82439TX MTXC (rev 01) :00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 01) :00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) :00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) :00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01) :00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) :00:0f.0 VGA compatible controller: Trident Microsystems TGUI 9660/938x/968x (rev d3) lspci -n: :00:00.0 0600: 8086:7100 (rev 01) :00:07.0 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 01) :00:07.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01) :00:07.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01) :00:07.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 01) :00:0b.0 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) :00:0f.0 0300: 1023:9660 (rev d3) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked: [O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] no CD Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems: [O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system: [O] Install boot loader: [O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: 1. During the package selection process, I chose File Server and also Manual Select (or whatever it is), which threw me into aptitude, which I have not used (I have been using dselect). So it was an 'unplanned surprise', and I had to carefully learn aptitude on-the-fly without messing up the last part of the install. Perhaps a user-choice here between manual using dselect or manual using aptitude, because this is the last part of the install and it would be sad to mess it up just because of not being familiar with aptitude. Anyway, it seems to have installed well for me, and must therefore be donkey-proof. 2. I originally chose 'manual' to unselect the exim package, as I don't need a mail-server, and could not find it in aptitude to unselect, so it probably installed it anyway. The base system configuration menu asked me to configure the MTA. I just chose 'no configure at this time', then later uninstalled exim4 with dselect. Perhaps a specific user choice as to whether a mail service is required. 3. I saw some hda IDE0 timeout/crc errors during boot when reiserfs was playing the transaction log, but this could be my hardware, which is very old. They dissappeared when I turned off the cpu overclocking in the BIOS. Looks like 2.6.8.1 might not like overclocking. 2.4.18-bf2.4 didnt mind it. 4. I though it odd that appletalk is installed by default as I have never used it myself. I killed it and its modules with dselect. Perhaps a user-choice if the user selects fileserver in tasksel? 5. It went very smoothly for me. The Debian U.S. mirror was down, and, for a while, it looked like an installer script had hung. I ctrl-C'd out, changed to the kernel.org mirror, and went along without problems. Perhaps a timeout to tell user that the mirror, not the installed, is dead. Perhaps a sig trap for people like me who Ctrl-C out of a script to see if the mirror had been contacted at all, and, if not, to ask for another mirror. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#117319: To high of a burden?
Hello again, This is Kirsten Warner. I am writing to you to confirm that we have accepted your mortgage application. Our office has just confirmed that you are eligible to receive a $380,000 loan for as low as $252.00 per month. The approval process takes no longer than a minute, so please fill out the form on our website: http://seminarian.e-mor-t-gage.com/?d37 Thank you. Best Regards Kirsten Warner Account Manager -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
