Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?
On Mi 22 Mai 2024 17:50:06 CEST, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Mike Gabriel (2024-05-22): The Lomiri Operating Environment packaging for Debian is currently seeing quite a boot because we have found a sponsor that finance the related work. Good one! /me grins, s/boot/boost/, of course. Mike -- mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer) mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148 landline: +49 (4351) 486 14 27 GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31 mail: sunwea...@debian.org, http://sunweavers.net pgphh1spMpy5v.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?
Hi Roland, (Cc:ing Guido who also works on Lomiri in Debian with correct now) On Mi 22 Mai 2024 16:50:02 CEST, Roland Clobus wrote: Hello installer team, I've noticed that (currently as draft) preparations [1] are ongoing to add Lomiri as task-lomiri-desktop into task-desktop. Is it intended to have Lomiri available in the installer and to have live images? If so, it would need some coordination to have it all set up. (I'm thinking of d-i, regular builds, openQA, Jenkins, live-build, ...) With kind regards, Roland Clobs [1] https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/merge_requests/30/ The plan is indeed to propose Lomiri as possible selection for a desktop environment in D-I. Unfortunately, I don't know what steps are required to get Lomiri in. Neither do I know who has a say in this, where it gets decided what gets included as installer option in D-I and what not. The Lomiri Operating Environment packaging for Debian is currently seeing quite a boot because we have found a sponsor that finance the related work. The overall goal is to have Lomiri available in Debian, so we can pre-install a Debian based tablet OS for Debian Edu. Thanks for picking this up starting the discussion! Mike (aka sunweaver at d.o) -- mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer) mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148 landline: +49 (4351) 486 14 27 GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31 mail: sunwea...@debian.org, http://sunweavers.net pgpQ4qzUSvBtv.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Re: Re-planning for 12.6
Just one thing could you please pull all world wide repos so the repos that are new are there and defunct repositories don’t appear. My repositories have been registered repositories for years and newer been in one release Mike Hosken Sent via my iPhone > On 3 Apr 2024, at 08:40, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> April 13th >> April 20th >> April 27th > > At current progress I expect to be available for the SRM side 13th or 27th. > We're in a good position to freeze this weekend to make the 13th, if others > are available then. > > The 20th is a no for me. > >> May 4th >> May 11th > > Currently OK for me. > > Though as soon as we're heading into the middle of May we might as well > wait for the next cadence in June. > > -- > Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org > Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw > > 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 > ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1 >
Bug#1008587: installation-reports: dist-upgrade to sid works but autoremove takes out most of the Mate DE
Package: installation-reports Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: kneedragon1...@gmail.com (Please provide enough information to help the Debian maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling in the sections below.) Boot method: netinstall-virtualmachine Image version: debian-11.3.0-amd64-netinst.iso Date: Machine: i7-6700-non-k Partitions: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ ] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect media: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.en.html .. and I don't know that it is appropriate. Allow me to explain. I have a copy of Debian in a virtualbox, on a machine running Mint as the host. I have converted to sid, so my sources.list looks like ~ -- deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid main deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sid main --- ~ I then go sudo apt dist-upgrade, and I get sid, and roughly 1 GB of left-over files, and apt encourages me to remove them by ~ sudo apt autoremove ~ all perfectly normal. What happens next is I can't reboot, I get a TTY. I can force a startx, but many of my Mate packages are gone. So an effort to manually reinstall mate, results in a dependency error, the version of mate to be installed requires an earlier version of python and you can't install that... I have made a clone of that install before I ran the autoremove and tried various fixes but so far I have been stumped. As long as I don't run the autoremove I have a perfectly functional sid + Mate, but there's about a GB of stuff I should be able to autoremove, and I can't... Sorry this doesn't comply with your format request, but in the circumstances, I think an effort to make it fit would simply confuse the problem. Yours respectfully, Mike Thompson. .> Please make sure that any installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. -- Package-specific info: == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="11 (bullseye) - installer build 20210731+deb11u3" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux debian 5.10.0-13-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.106-1 (2022-03-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] [8086:1237] (rev 02) lspci -knn: 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] [8086:7000] lspci -knn: 00:01.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE [8086:7111] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ata_piix lspci -knn: Kernel modules: ata_piix, ata_generic lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Graphics Adapter [80ee:beef] lspci -knn: Subsystem: VMware Device [15ad:0405] lspci -knn: 00:03.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller [8086:100e] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Intel Corporation PRO/1000 MT Desktop Adapter [8086:001e] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: e1000 lspci -knn: Kernel modules: e1000 lspci -knn: 00:04.0 System peripheral [0880]: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Guest Service [80ee:cafe] lspci -knn: 00:05.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation 82801AA AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:2415] (rev 01) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0177] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: snd_intel8x0 lspci -knn: Kernel modules: snd_intel8x0 lspci -knn: 00:06.0 USB controller [0c03]: Apple Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB [106b:003f] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci-pci lspci -knn: Kernel modules: ohci_pci lspci -knn: 00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI [8086:7113] (rev 08) lspci -knn: 00:0d.0 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 82801HM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [8086:2829] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ahci lspci -knn: Kernel modules: ahci usb-list: usb-list: Bus 01 Device 01: OHCI PCI host controller [1d6b:0001] usb-list:Level 00 Parent 00 Port 00 Class 09(hub ) Subclass 00 Protocol 00 usb-list:Manufacturer: Linux 5.10.0-13-amd64 ohci_hcd usb-list:Interface 00: Class 09(hub ) Subclass 00 Protocol 00 Driver hub usb-list: usb-list: Bus 01 Device 02: USB Tablet [80ee:0021] usb-list:Level 01 P
Re: Debian CD
It’s an HP Storageworks P4300 G2 san. I’ve tried different usb sticks and cd rom drive. I’m guessing it’s a configvodd Mike Hosken Sent via my iPhone > On 5/03/2022, at 08:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > On 3/4/22 20:22, Mike Hosken wrote: >> It’s a RP4300 G3 > > What kind of hardware is that? When I google this, I'm getting results > for hamradio hand receivers. > > Adrian > > -- > .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org > `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de > `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Debian CD
Hi team, I’m trying to install Debian/Linux after a large amount of effort replacing drives and fans etc. I configured the raid with no problems using the raid card. When it comes to installing from usb it boots into the section of what you want to install Debian 11.2 official, enter to boot tab for options. This is where it gets stuck, and try’s to reboot every 15 seconds to so. Cd won’t boot so apart from setting up a bootstrapping from the network. It’s a RP4300 G3 Mike Hosken Sent via my iPhone
Bug#995063: os-prober fails to detect partition when the device name is a substring of another device
Package: os-prober Version: 1.77 Severity: important Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, My system has another linux install located on /dev/sde1, which os-prober should detect There is also a /dev/sde127 which is part of a raid array In this case, os-prober line 141 incorrectly believes that /dev/sde1 is part of a raid array, because grep -q "^/dev/sde1" $OS_PROBER_TMP/raided-map returns true as it matches the /dev/sde127 line. This can be fixed by changing the line to read if grep -q "^$mapped\$" "$OS_PROBER_TMP/raided-map" ; then Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.10 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-17-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages os-prober depends on: ii grub-common 2.02+dfsg1-20+deb10u4 ii libc62.28-10 os-prober recommends no packages. os-prober suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
Bug#991417: simple-cdd generated iso: No kernel modules were found
Package: installation-reports Boot method: "simple-cdd --qemu-only" Image version: 5.10.0-7-amd64 Date: 2021-07-22 Machine: qemu kvm, on top of bullseye amd64 Processor: QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ (over i7-6920HQ physical) Memory: 4G in QEMU (64G physical) I've been using simple-cdd running on my bullseye host to generate a custom iso (also bullseye). My simple-cdd config had been working fine until a couple days ago. Now I am getting an error early in debian-installer when I boot from the generated ISO: "No kernel modules were found. This probably is due to a mismatch between the kernel used by this version of the installer and the kernel version available in the archive." I find that simple-cdd is generating the iso with the following kernel: Linux ... 5.10.0-7-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.40.1 (2021-05-28) x86_64 GNU Linux However the host system (recently apt upgraded) has the following kernel: Linux ... 5.10.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.46.2 (2021-07-20) x86_64 GNU Linux (note the date on the kernel is only 2 days prior from when I ran into this issue) I am not specifying mirror/codename nor mirror/suite in the preseed that simple-cdd is using. My understanding is this allows debian-installer to install whatever version ends up in the generated iso's initrd. I also tried again with these values enabled and set to "bullseye" however the problem remained. Searching for this error I find that other people that have had the same issue in the past. In past bug reports this seems to have been fixed somewhere in the distro, so I'm reporting it here. Since this problem seems to come back every now and again, I'd also like to know if there is a workaround that people can put into their simple-cdd config to allow things to keep working when the kernels occasionally get out of sync like this. If that's possible, it might be good to mention that workaround here, for future searchers. Thanks!
Publish guest contributions
"Hi, We need an advertising space with do-follow links on your blog security-tracker.debian.org. • We provide 500+ words • no copy article • the duration will be a minimum of 1 year Can you please write to us if possible to place an article with a link leading to betting related site and how much it will cost? Please let me know if you are interested. Stay safe and healthy. Regards, "
Bug#979386: debian-installer: Install Annoyance
Package: debian-installer Version: buster Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I have a triple-boot setup so GRUB and swap both exist, and that creates the annoyance. Debian installer displays messages about the necessity of having GRUB installed, which implies it's possible to not install GRUB, but that option is not available. After installing Debian it's necessary to boot the primary OS and reinstall the custom GRUB. Life would be better if there was an option to skip the 'install GRUB' step. Debian installer formats swap, which changes the UUID, and not formatting is not an option. After installing Debian it's necessary to edit any other fstabs and update the swap UUIDs. Life would be better if there was an option to not format swap. -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.7 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-13-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Bug#726137: Info received (DVD remains locked when requested to switch DVDs during Package Scan)
It also appears that every time it goes through a package install there is a mount message for the DVD Generated which requires a remount of the DVD media because it thinks the medisa CHANGED. This can add up to a lot of mount messages if you are doing a fresh install. The error happened during installations on two machines, with two different DVD Readers. After a remount it appears multiple packages are being loaded so I can only presume that there are multiple package requests being submitted behind one mount request. -Original Message- From: Debian Bug Tracking System Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 3:27 PM To: Mike Stanton Subject: Bug#726137: Info received (DVD remains locked when requested to switch DVDs during Package Scan) Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian Install System Team If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 726...@bugs.debian.org. Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. -- 726137: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726137 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#726137: DVD remains locked when requested to switch DVDs during Package Scan
I have seen the same problem. It is because the driver for the DVD locks the DVD when processing the files and does not unlock it when it asks for the volume to be swapped. The workaround is to use a paper clip to manually release the media tray for the DVD/CD device. It is a small hole in the case near the DVD Eject button. Barring that if the device is an External device, cycling power on the device will release it. When you put the new media into the tray, it will recover the loss of power condition after you issue the next I/O request by answering the Swap message. It appears this message has been out there a long time Michael Stanton GEOSPAN Corporation 6901 E. Fish Lake Road Suite 156 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763-493-9320 X5003 651-270-3191 (mobile) www.geospan.com
Fresh install of Debian 10.2 subject to bug #860533
Hi, I wasn't sure where to report this, so I'm shooting here. I recently installed Debian 10.2 on a new machine, and went with manual partitioning, putting the swap on an encrypted mdraid with a random key, and the result is that booting the system would have a very large delay on boot. In recovery mode (or normal more without quiet on the kernel command line), I was able to see a loop of messages saying "Running /scripts/local-block ... done", which led me to find bug #860533, and it turns out the problem was related: something in the installer had filled /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume with "RESUME=/dev/mapper/md2_crypt", and that doesn't work, which makes sense considering the random key. Arguably, the initramfs hooks should probably complain about this setup too, but it seems the installer should also avoid creating it in the first place. Cheers, Mike
Bug#851189: keyboard-configuration: ALT+Cursor-Left switches consoles instead of working on app in focus
It's a xenial chroot and it indeed doesn't have that test in keyboard-configuration.postinst. Perhaps just an ubuntu issue then, sorry for the noise. ;-)
Bug#851189: keyboard-configuration: ALT+Cursor-Left switches consoles instead of working on app in focus
Hi again. In short I kind of just copied that post blindly and only now looked into things further. > Mmm, do you mean that this postinst script ends up calling setupcon > --force --save in a living Ubuntu system, not the installer of Ubuntu? > The script checks for the presence of the /lib/debian-installer.d > directory, does that directory really exist in an installed Ubuntu > system? If so, that's the problem, that directory shouldn't exist on an > installed system. >> To reproduce: >> sudo apt install --reinstall keyboard-configuration > That doesn't trigger the issue on an installed Debian system (which > doesn't have /lib/debian-installer.d). I did just try this myself and you're right, this didn't trigger it. Which got me to think more of what could have and I did recently build wine in an ubuntu chroot which is a plausible cause, I think?
Bug#851189: keyboard-configuration: ALT+Cursor-Left switches consoles instead of working on app in focus
This started happening to me recently, not sure what change could be to blame but I found a lengthy thread on the ubuntu bug tracker that seems to confirm things. Copying the relevant post: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1508146/comments/66 --- In my case, I traced the issue to the keyboard-configuration package postinst script, which ends up calling 'setupcon --force --save' which in turn calls 'kbd_mode -u' To reproduce: sudo apt install --reinstall keyboard-configuration setupcon documentation states: "--force Do not check whether we are on the console. Notice that you can be forced to hard-reboot your computer if you run setupcon with this option and the screen is controlled by a X server." It looks like the checks to avoid this behavior while a graphic environment is active don't work in the context of the installer. --- In any case they've found 'sudo kbd_mode -s' to be a workaround.
Bug#798772: Ahoj kamaráde
Ahoj kamaráde, Jsem generál Curtis M. Scaparrotti. Generální státní americká armáda ze Spojených států amerických. Jsem pečující a podpůrný člověk, který hledá přítele, aby vytvořil vzájemný vztah. Prosím, odpovězte mi na další diskusi, pokud máte zájem. S přátelským pozdravem. GEN. CURTIS M. SCAPARROTTI.
Re: Curious case of /lib/libkmod.so.2
Small update here. I broke out of the make run and manually invoked mklibs-copy in verbose mode. It turns out that libkmod.so.2 does it fact get copied out of the /lib directory on the system being used to construct the initrd (I guess I must have had that package installed after all). See the highlighted line in the mklibs-copy output here: https://gist.github.com/mikepurvis/a7182157f63ea01649cfca01a57f1068#file-mklibs-copy-L275 The same thing happens with libslang.so.2, a few lines further down. This behaviour seems very odd and undesirable to me— wouldn't it break the ability to generate an installer for a different architecture? These libraries should be coming from libkmod2-udeb and libslang2-udeb, respectively, right? Should there be a bug filed for this? Mike On 15 March 2018 at 16:17, Mike Purvis <mpur...@clearpath.ai> wrote: > Hi d-i developers, > > I'm working on an bootloader/installer system for some industrial > equipment. Until now, my main interaction with d-i has been grabbing the > pre-cooked kernel/initrds from Debian or Ubuntu, and tacking on a few extra > files to the tail of the initrd, like preseed, scripts, and an extra udeb > or two. > > However, I've come to a place where I'd like to have more control over > some things (incl exact kernel version) and so I want to generate my own > initrd with just the particular udebs I require. I'm basing most of my work > on the Makefile here, which details downloading a dependency tree of > packages, and creating a bare bones dpkg setup into which they are > installed: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer.git/ > tree/build/Makefile#n308 > > My system actually mostly works, but one key file I'm missing is > /lib/libkmod.so.2. This file isn't contained within any of the udebs > (libkmod2-udeb is just a multi-call binary with no libs), and in fact a > little tracing reveals that it springs into existence as a result of the > mklibs-copy call which happens here: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer.git/ > tree/build/Makefile#n526 > > Without this lib, systemd-udevd fails to link at runtime (called by the > init script), and the kernel panics shortly after boot. > > So my main question is, what is going on with the mklibs-copy call? Where > are the contents of libkmod.so.2 coming from? They're byte-for-byte > identical with the copy in the libkmod2 package, but in a different > location, and I don't even have that package installed. > > I'm sure there's some silly explanation here that I'm just not seeing, but > a I think I need a poke in the right direction to get there. Thanks, > > Mike >
Curious case of /lib/libkmod.so.2
Hi d-i developers, I'm working on an bootloader/installer system for some industrial equipment. Until now, my main interaction with d-i has been grabbing the pre-cooked kernel/initrds from Debian or Ubuntu, and tacking on a few extra files to the tail of the initrd, like preseed, scripts, and an extra udeb or two. However, I've come to a place where I'd like to have more control over some things (incl exact kernel version) and so I want to generate my own initrd with just the particular udebs I require. I'm basing most of my work on the Makefile here, which details downloading a dependency tree of packages, and creating a bare bones dpkg setup into which they are installed: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer.git/tree/build/Makefile#n308 My system actually mostly works, but one key file I'm missing is /lib/libkmod.so.2. This file isn't contained within any of the udebs (libkmod2-udeb is just a multi-call binary with no libs), and in fact a little tracing reveals that it springs into existence as a result of the mklibs-copy call which happens here: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d-i/debian-installer.git/tree/build/Makefile#n526 Without this lib, systemd-udevd fails to link at runtime (called by the init script), and the kernel panics shortly after boot. So my main question is, what is going on with the mklibs-copy call? Where are the contents of libkmod.so.2 coming from? They're byte-for-byte identical with the copy in the libkmod2 package, but in a different location, and I don't even have that package installed. I'm sure there's some silly explanation here that I'm just not seeing, but a I think I need a poke in the right direction to get there. Thanks, Mike
Bug#888709: debootstrap: Silently fails if the target directory exists and is not empty.
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.89 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I was running sbuild-createchroot, and it failed with: I: Chosen extractor for .deb packages: dpkg-deb I: Extracting libacl1... E: Error running debootstrap at /usr/sbin/sbuild-createchroot line 268. Turns out that was happening because the target directory existed and was not empty. But neither debootstrap nor sbuild-createchroot printed out something useful. Debootstrap surely shouldn't fail without saying what went wrong. Mike
Fwd: Headless installer boot
Also implement the serial console as primary console after installation. Mike Hosken Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Mike Hosken <m...@purple-cat.net> > Date: 17 January 2018 at 22:17:51 NZDT > To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org > Subject: Headless installer boot > > Hi Team, > > Just a quick question I wish to use serial port as console to install > servers. I’m not familiar with grub etc as I’ve only ever used palo. Could > someone point me in the right direction as to implement console=/dev/ttys0, > for the AMD64 port and I386. I assume it would be a change when building the > install media. > > Mike Hosken > > Sent from my iPhone
Headless installer boot
Hi Team, Just a quick question I wish to use serial port as console to install servers. I’m not familiar with grub etc as I’ve only ever used palo. Could someone point me in the right direction as to implement console=/dev/ttys0, for the AMD64 port and I386. I assume it would be a change when building the install media. Mike Hosken Sent from my iPhone
Thanks for your help
After some good help, I've managed to bend the stable debian-installer into compiling for the hppa arch. There were a few changes made to the config files and debian rules files to enable to an unofficial build based off my unofficial repo. I am very thankful for the constructive advise given by Jose which was priceless. Thanks Mike Hosken > >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Mike Hosken <mik...@csystems.co.nz> wrote: >> Thank you for you assistance. I'll give these a try and get back to you. >> >> Mike Hosken >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 18/07/2017, at 22:32, Jose R R <jose@metztli-it.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Mike Hosken <mik...@csystems.co.nz> wrote: >> >> Let's try this again. >> >> >> I am trying to build stable install images for HPPA. I have built 'sid' >> >> images previously from Debian ports. >> >> >> The troubles I'm having is when I build the installer - >> >> >> It says while building that my mirror appears invalid and will not use it. >> >> >> When using the git checkout it gives two errors while building. The invalid >> >> mirror and it's the wrong kernel, as in not the stable but testing. >> >> >> I am hoping someone can help me with these questions. >> >> >> Is there a git repo for the stable installer ? If so how do I check it out >> >> As far as I know, git is only for unstable Debian-Installer (d-i) >> >> ? Or do I use the source package in stretch. > *also* > To wean out any potential Debian-Installer (d-i) dependencies > errors/issues, please do as below commands: > > apt-get install debian-installer > apt-get build-dep debian-installer > > then (if not already there) cd to your d-i directory created at your > file system location where you executed: > apt-get source debian-installer > > and do: > dpkg-checkbuilddeps > > Install any dependencies output to your screen and... > > repeat above command until there are no more dependency issues. > > References: > < https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Build > > > Additionally, please consider the use of a virtual machine where to > test your images; it allows peeking inside the installer environment > to check/verify what's going on. tty CTRL +ALT + F4 (in Linux/AMD64 -- > but I don't know in HPPA) will output useful info, giving you hints on > what snags may prevent success of your d-i effort. >> >> If you are building on *and* for (stable) Stretch on HPPA, >> >> apt-get update >> apt-get source -d debian-installer >> >> >> What changes do I need to make ( in the source code) to get Debian-Installer >> >> when building to trust my unofficial but signed repo to download the udebs >> >> etc. >> >> Please look in >> d-i/build/config/common >> >> OR (dirty but works) >> >> If you are only downloading your kernel & modules you may do a hack in >> source of: >> < https://packages.debian.org/stretch/base-installer > >> and rebuild the udeb(s) and place them under >> d-i/build/localudebs/ >> >> Might also work (have not tested) by >> >> doing a hack in source -- by adding your mirror to be listed: >> < https://packages.debian.org/stretch/choose-mirror > >> and rebuild the udeb(s) and place them under >> d-i/build/localudebs/ >> >> *Add* name of created UDEBs in proper format into list: >> >> d-i/build/pkg-lists/[directory image]/*cfg >> > [] > Good Luck! > > > Best Professional Regards. > > -- > Jose R R > http://metztli.it > ----- > Download Metztli Reiser4: Debian Stretch with Linux 4.11 > - > for AMD64 https://sf.net/projects/metztli-reiser4/ > - > Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS > - > from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.comrepository. Cloud the easy way! Mike Hosken Sent from my iPhone
Debian installer.
Let's try this again. I am trying to build stable install images for HPPA. I have built 'sid' images previously from Debian ports. The troubles I'm having is when I build the installer - It says while building that my mirror appears invalid and will not use it. When using the git checkout it gives two errors while building. The invalid mirror and it's the wrong kernel, as in not the stable but testing. I am hoping someone can help me with these questions. Is there a git repo for the stable installer ? If so how do I check it out ? Or do I use the source package in stretch. What changes do I need to make ( in the source code) to get Debian-Installer when building to trust my unofficial but signed repo to download the udebs etc. Also what changes do I need to make again to source code to specify the kernel in my repo. Any constructive advice would be appreciated. Mike Hosken Sent from my iPhone
Re: Building Debian installer error
Mike Hosken Sent from my iPhone > On 17/07/2017, at 23:13, Geert Stappers <stapp...@stappers.nl> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 09:16:09PM +1200, Mike Hosken wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to build debian-installer-20170615 for hppa >> >> I'm getting an error stating mirror appears to be invalid ; skipping. >> >> This makes the build fail as it can't download the udebs etc. >> >> How do I get Debian installer to trust my mirror? The mirror unofficial >> but is signed and has had the key added to apt via apt key. Apt has >> no errors. >> >> Also is there a git repo for the stable installer instead of d/i, >> if so how would one check it out. > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/CheckOut This was the method I used to create hppa cds. So my question is where in the code do I tell it what kernel to use and how do I get it to trust my repo. Thanks for some assistance. Mike > >> I don't have much experience with Debian-Installer > > Advise: Start with getting experience on popular architecture, > pick exoctic architectures like hppa when more experiencement. > >> so any help would be appreciated. > > Advise: Avoid retransmits > > In case you think a message wasn't seen, was lost in transmission, > then tell it is a retransmit. Karma bonus points for telling > about the progress since the previous transmit. > > > Groeten > Geert Stappers > -- > Leven en laten leven >
Building Debian installer error
Hi, I'm trying to build debian-installer-20170615 for hppa I'm getting an error stating mirror appears to be invalid ; skipping. This makes the build fail as it can't download the udebs etc. How do I get Debian installer to trust my mirror? The mirror unofficial but is signed and has had the key added to apt via apt key. Apt has no errors. Also is there a git repo for the stable installer instead of d/i, if so how would one check it out. I don't have much experience with Debian-Installer so any help would be appreciated. Mike Hosken Sent from my iPhone
Building Debian installer error
Hi, I'm trying to build debian-installer-20170615 for hppa I'm getting an error stating mirror appears to be invalid ; skipping. This makes the build fail as it can't download the udebs etc. How do I get Debian installer to trust my mirror? The mirror unofficial but is signed and has had the key added to apt via apt key. Apt has no errors. Also is there a git repo for the stable installer instead of d/i, if so how would one check it out. I don't have much experience with Debian-Installer so any help would be appreciated. Mike Hosken Sent from my iPhone
Building Debian installer
Mike Hosken Sent from my iPhone
Bug#688336: os-probe: subvol: patches to provide bootloaders with all the subvolume info.
These patches can be tested from here: https://launchpad.net/~cheako/+archive/ubuntu/boot-subvol Code from here: https://github.com/cheako/os-prober/tree/aggregate
Bug#688336: os-probe: subvol: patches to provide bootloaders with all the subvolume info.
Here are corrected versions of these patches. Filesystem raid is almost certainly a separate bug. From 3d4b580dea4592793af3411fc0543af36de0e958 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael MestnikDate: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 13:04:05 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] Process filesystem raid entries --- common.sh | 14 -- os-prober | 5 + 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/common.sh b/common.sh index e1646d4..d6fee58 100644 --- a/common.sh +++ b/common.sh @@ -146,12 +146,22 @@ is_dos_extended_partition() { return 1 } +canonical_dev () { + local dev="${1#/dev/}" + local sys="$(find /sys/fs/btrfs -path \*/devices/"$dev")" + if [ -e "$sys" ]; then + echo /dev/"$(ls "${sys%/$dev}" | head -n1)" + else + echo "$1" + fi +} + parse_proc_mounts () { while read -r line; do set -f set -- $line set +f - printf '%s %s %s\n' "$(mapdevfs "$1")" "$2" "$3" + printf '%s %s %s\n' "$(canonical_dev "$(mapdevfs "$1")")" "$2" "$3" done } @@ -245,7 +255,7 @@ linux_mount_boot () { fi fi shift - set -- "$(mapdevfs "$tmppart")" "$@" + set -- "$(canonical_dev "$(mapdevfs "$tmppart")")" "$@" if grep -q "^$1 " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map"; then bindfrom="$(grep "^$1 " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map" | head -n1 | cut -d " " -f 2)" diff --git a/os-prober b/os-prober index a48863e..e4439a7 100755 --- a/os-prober +++ b/os-prober @@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ for partition in $(partitions); do continue fi + if ! [ "$mapped" = "$(canonical_dev "$mapped")" ]; then + log "Device '$mapped' is part of filesystem raid; skipping" + continue + fi + # Skip partitions used in software RAID arrays if grep -q "^$mapped" "$OS_PROBER_TMP/raided-map" ; then debug "$partition: part of software raid array" -- 2.11.0 From bd6d7a78e88eba3a03940e84f6e168ab5c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Mestnik Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:08:42 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] Pass subvol data for /boot to bootloadter(s) --- common.sh | 36 + linux-boot-prober | 6 +++-- linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests| 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/40grub2| 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/90fallback | 5 ++-- linux-boot-probes/mounted/powerpc/40yaboot | 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/sparc/50silo | 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/x86/40grub| 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/x86/50lilo| 3 ++- 9 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/common.sh b/common.sh index 1001c74..ff278c3 100644 --- a/common.sh +++ b/common.sh @@ -253,6 +253,42 @@ linux_mount_boot () { shift set -- "$(mapdevfs "$tmppart")" "$@" + if bootsubvolid="$(echo "$4" | grep -o 'subvolid=[0-9][0-9]*')"; then +bootsubvolid="$(echo "$bootsubvolid" | cut -d= -f2-)" +if mount -o "subvolid=$bootsubvolid" "$1" "$tmpmnt/boot"; then + if [ "$bootsubvolid" = "$(get_default_subvolid "$tmpmnt/boot")" ]; then + mountboot="$1 1" + return + else + mountboot="$1 1 $bootsubvolid" + return + fi +else + debug "failed to subvolid-mount $1 onto $tmpmnt/boot" + mountboot="$1 0 $bootsubvolid" + return +fi + else +if bootsubvol="$(echo "$4" | grep -o 'subvol=[^,]*')"; then + bootsubvol="$(echo "$bootsubvol" | cut -d= -f2-)" + bootsubvol="${bootsubvol#/}" + if mount -o "subvol=${bootsubvol:=/}" "$1" "$tmpmnt/boot"; then + bootsubvolid="$(grep "^/dev/" /proc/mounts | parse_proc_mounts | grep " $tmpmnt/boot " | cut -d ' ' -f 4)" + if [ "$bootsubvolid" = "$(get_default_subvolid "$tmpmnt/boot")" ]; then + mountboot="$1 1" + return + else + mountboot="$1 1 ${bootsubvolid:-@$bootsubvol}" + return + fi + else + debug "failed to subvol-mount $1 onto $tmpmnt/boot" + mountboot="$1 0 @$bootsubvol" + return + fi +fi + fi + if grep -q "^$1 " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map"; then bindfrom="$(grep "^$1 " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map" | head -n1 | cut -d " " -f 2)" bindfrom="$(unescape_mount "$bindfrom")" diff --git a/linux-boot-prober b/linux-boot-prober index 4a86119..ae34670 100755 --- a/linux-boot-prober +++ b/linux-boot-prober @@ -36,19 +36,21 @@ else mpoint="$(unescape_mount "$mpoint")" if [ "$mpoint" != "/target/boot" ] && [ "$mpoint" != "/target" ] && [ "$mpoint" != "/" ]; then type="$(echo "$mrecord" | head -n1 | cut -d ' ' -f 3)" - if ! grep -q " $mpoint/boot " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map"; then + if ! bootrecord="$(grep -q " $mpoint/boot " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map")"; then linux_mount_boot "$partition" "$mpoint" "$subvolid" set -- $mountboot bootpart="$1" bootmounted="$2" + bootsubvolid="$3" else bootpart="$partition" bootmounted=0 + bootsubvolid="$(echo "$bootrecord" | head -n1 | cut -d ' ' -f 4)"
Bug#864246: os-probe: Also skip over bcache partitions.
Here is an updated copy of this patch. From 6439f5a40bd4e610a462292c646098eeb4d5bcb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael MestnikDate: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:52:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Add in bcache devices --- linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests | 3 +++ os-prober| 10 ++ os-probes/common/50mounted-tests | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests b/linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests index ad68874..937553a 100755 --- a/linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests +++ b/linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ elif [ "$types" = swap ]; then elif [ "$types" = crypto_LUKS ]; then debug "$1 is a LUKS partition; skipping" exit 0 +elif [ "$types" = bcache ]; then + debug "$1 is an bcache partition; skipping" + exit 0 elif [ "$types" = ntfs ]; then if type ntfs-3g >/dev/null 2>&1; then types='ntfs-3g ntfs' diff --git a/os-prober b/os-prober index a48863e..ab2dee1 100755 --- a/os-prober +++ b/os-prober @@ -45,6 +45,16 @@ partitions () { fi done + # bcahce + for part in /sys/block/bcache*; do + if [ -f "$part/inflight" ]; then +name="$(echo "${part##*/}" | sed 's,[!.],/,g')" +if [ -e "/dev/$name" ]; then + echo "/dev/$name" +fi + fi + done + # Add Serial ATA RAID devices if type dmraid >/dev/null 2>&1 && \ dmraid -s -c >/dev/null 2>&1; then diff --git a/os-probes/common/50mounted-tests b/os-probes/common/50mounted-tests index fca15cb..09c88b3 100755 --- a/os-probes/common/50mounted-tests +++ b/os-probes/common/50mounted-tests @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ elif [ "$types" = crypto_LUKS ]; then elif [ "$types" = LVM2_member ]; then debug "$1 is an LVM member; skipping" exit 0 +elif [ "$types" = bcache ]; then + debug "$1 is an bcache partition; skipping" + exit 0 elif [ "$types" = ntfs ]; then if type ntfs-3g >/dev/null 2>&1; then types='ntfs-3g ntfs' -- 2.11.0
Bug#688336: os-probe: subvol: patches to provide bootloaders with all the subvolume info.
Using these patches reveals they are not complete, there are two areas that need to be addressed. Firstly the kernel can and will use any device in a filesystem for the contents of /proc/mount. This causes problems in multiple areas that os-probe will have to compensate for. Second 50mounted-tests was not updated at all, so these patches only work if the subvolume is mounted and you don't encounter the first issue.
Bug#864181: Fwd: Bug#864181: os-prober: dmraid detection not functional.
In that case the proposed patch is wrong, dmraid is run every time the file exists. Not only is the conditional in test wrong, but the file is created when it should be being removed.
Bug#688336: os-probe: subvol: patches to provide bootloaders with all the subvolume info.
Hello, This is the result of several days working the issues and analysing each aspect. These patches include only what is necessary to support subvol. Care has been taken to future proof by preparing for other filesystems, currently this only works with btrfs. These patches have been split, solving four main goals. 1. Scan btrfs filesystems only once, regardless of how many devices they span. 2. Report to the bootloader the existence of OS lurking on subvolumes. 3. Add option to linux-boot-prober for subvolume and output appropriate rootoptions. 4. Tell bootloader about boot filesystems on a subvolume. 1 is simple and can be applied with no changes to the bootloader. 2 extends the output of os-prober to support subvolumes. Existing bootloaders should ignore these records as the key was changed from linux to linux-subvol and the device is listed as device@subvolid. 3 requires the bootloader to be patched to support the above linux-subvol records. It should be a noop for bootloaders that don't pass a subvolid as the second parameter to linux-boot-prober. 4 I would hold off on, it requires the bootloader to support subvolumes and I think it's ok to restrict the boot device to non-subvolumes until such support is added. From c37c722edba11566ce4bd73e80120b56a37dfa37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael MestnikDate: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:08:42 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Pass subvol data for /boot to bootloadter(s) --- common.sh | 36 + linux-boot-prober | 6 +++-- linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/40grub2| 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/90fallback | 5 ++-- linux-boot-probes/mounted/powerpc/40yaboot | 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/sparc/50silo | 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/x86/40grub| 3 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/x86/50lilo| 3 ++- 8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/common.sh b/common.sh index 1001c74..ff278c3 100644 --- a/common.sh +++ b/common.sh @@ -253,6 +253,42 @@ linux_mount_boot () { shift set -- "$(mapdevfs "$tmppart")" "$@" + if bootsubvolid="$(echo "$4" | grep -o 'subvolid=[0-9][0-9]*')"; then +bootsubvolid="$(echo "$bootsubvolid" | cut -d= -f2-)" +if mount -o "subvolid=$bootsubvolid" "$1" "$tmpmnt/boot"; then + if [ "$bootsubvolid" = "$(get_default_subvolid "$tmpmnt/boot")" ]; then + mountboot="$1 1" + return + else + mountboot="$1 1 $bootsubvolid" + return + fi +else + debug "failed to subvolid-mount $1 onto $tmpmnt/boot" + mountboot="$1 0 $bootsubvolid" + return +fi + else +if bootsubvol="$(echo "$4" | grep -o 'subvol=[^,]*')"; then + bootsubvol="$(echo "$bootsubvol" | cut -d= -f2-)" + bootsubvol="${bootsubvol#/}" + if mount -o "subvol=${bootsubvol:=/}" "$1" "$tmpmnt/boot"; then + bootsubvolid="$(grep "^/dev/" /proc/mounts | parse_proc_mounts | grep " $tmpmnt/boot " | cut -d ' ' -f 4)" + if [ "$bootsubvolid" = "$(get_default_subvolid "$tmpmnt/boot")" ]; then + mountboot="$1 1" + return + else + mountboot="$1 1 ${bootsubvolid:-@$bootsubvol}" + return + fi + else + debug "failed to subvol-mount $1 onto $tmpmnt/boot" + mountboot="$1 0 @$bootsubvol" + return + fi +fi + fi + if grep -q "^$1 " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map"; then bindfrom="$(grep "^$1 " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map" | head -n1 | cut -d " " -f 2)" bindfrom="$(unescape_mount "$bindfrom")" diff --git a/linux-boot-prober b/linux-boot-prober index c53f05d..ba1a0bf 100755 --- a/linux-boot-prober +++ b/linux-boot-prober @@ -36,19 +36,21 @@ else mpoint="$(unescape_mount "$mpoint")" if [ "$mpoint" != "/target/boot" ] && [ "$mpoint" != "/target" ] && [ "$mpoint" != "/" ]; then type=$(echo "$mrecord" | head -n1 | cut -d " " -f 3) - if ! grep -q " $mpoint/boot " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map"; then + if ! bootrecord="$(grep -q " $mpoint/boot " "$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map")"; then linux_mount_boot "$partition" "$mpoint" set -- $mountboot bootpart="$1" bootmounted="$2" + bootsubvolid="$3" else bootpart="$partition" bootmounted=0 + bootsubvolid="$(echo "$bootrecord" | head -n1 | cut -d ' ' -f 4)" fi for test in /usr/lib/linux-boot-probes/mounted/*; do if [ -f $test ] && [ -x $test ]; then debug "running $test on mounted $partition" -if $test "$partition" "$bootpart" "$mpoint" "$type" "$subvolid"; then +if $test "$partition" "$bootpart" "$mpoint" "$type" "$subvolid" "$bootsubvolid"; then debug "$test succeeded" break fi diff --git a/linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/40grub2 b/linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/40grub2 index 9d0b48c..06b8744 100755 --- a/linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/40grub2 +++ b/linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/40grub2 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ bootpart="$2" mpoint="$3" type="$4"
Bug#864181: Fwd: Bug#864181: os-prober: dmraid detection not functional.
This does look better, I love the use of operators over if statements. I don't think using a temp file is necessary here. I also wish the regex wouldn't ever match a device containing the name of another device, in that it should match the surrounding bits. { dmraid -r -c 2>/dev/null || true } | grep -q "$device" && return 0
Bug#864246: os-probe: Also skip over bcache partitions.
This patch also adds bcache to list of partitions types to skip. Note that linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests is missing LVM2_member from said list. From 6439f5a40bd4e610a462292c646098eeb4d5bcb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael MestnikDate: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:52:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Add in bcache devices --- linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests | 3 +++ os-prober| 10 ++ os-probes/common/50mounted-tests | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests b/linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests index ad68874..937553a 100755 --- a/linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests +++ b/linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ elif [ "$types" = swap ]; then elif [ "$types" = crypto_LUKS ]; then debug "$1 is a LUKS partition; skipping" exit 0 +elif [ "$types" = bcache ]; then + debug "$1 is an bcache partition; skipping" + exit 0 elif [ "$types" = ntfs ]; then if type ntfs-3g >/dev/null 2>&1; then types='ntfs-3g ntfs' diff --git a/os-prober b/os-prober index a48863e..ab2dee1 100755 --- a/os-prober +++ b/os-prober @@ -45,6 +45,16 @@ partitions () { fi done + # bcahce + for part in /sys/block/bcache*; do + if [ -f "$part/inflight" ]; then +name="$(echo "${part##*/}" | sed 's,[!.],/,g')" +if [ -e "/dev/$name" ]; then + echo "/dev/$name" +fi + fi + done + # Add Serial ATA RAID devices if type dmraid >/dev/null 2>&1 && \ dmraid -s -c >/dev/null 2>&1; then diff --git a/os-probes/common/50mounted-tests b/os-probes/common/50mounted-tests index fca15cb..09c88b3 100755 --- a/os-probes/common/50mounted-tests +++ b/os-probes/common/50mounted-tests @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ elif [ "$types" = crypto_LUKS ]; then elif [ "$types" = LVM2_member ]; then debug "$1 is an LVM member; skipping" exit 0 +elif [ "$types" = bcache ]; then + debug "$1 is an bcache partition; skipping" + exit 0 elif [ "$types" = ntfs ]; then if type ntfs-3g >/dev/null 2>&1; then types='ntfs-3g ntfs' -- 2.11.0
Bug#864246: os-prober: Add bcache support.
Package: os-prober Version: 1.75 Severity: normal Tags: patch Looks like bcache devices are not detected. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (490, 'testing'), (480, 'unstable'), (470, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-19-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages os-prober depends on: ii grub-common 2.02~beta3-5 ii libc62.24-9 os-prober recommends no packages. os-prober suggests no packages. - -- no debconf information From c297939ba83ae45f0a0eb6bee10b9641d4f2d798 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael MestnikDate: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:52:17 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Add in bcache devices --- os-prober | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/os-prober b/os-prober index a48863e..ab2dee1 100755 --- a/os-prober +++ b/os-prober @@ -45,6 +45,16 @@ partitions () { fi done + # bcahce + for part in /sys/block/bcache*; do + if [ -f "$part/inflight" ]; then +name="$(echo "${part##*/}" | sed 's,[!.],/,g')" +if [ -e "/dev/$name" ]; then + echo "/dev/$name" +fi + fi + done + # Add Serial ATA RAID devices if type dmraid >/dev/null 2>&1 && \ dmraid -s -c >/dev/null 2>&1; then -- 2.11.0
Bug#864181: os-prober: dmraid detection not functional.
Package: os-prober Version: 1.75 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here is the code as found in os-prober:17 : >"$OS_PROBER_TMP/dmraid-map" DMRAID=$(type dmraid >/dev/null 2>&1 || true) if [ "$DMRAID" ]; then dmraid -r -c >"$OS_PROBER_TMP/dmraid-map" fi The problem is that $DMRAID will always be empty because stdout is redirected. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (490, 'testing'), (480, 'unstable'), (470, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-19-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages os-prober depends on: ii grub-common 2.02~beta3-5 ii libc62.24-9 os-prober recommends no packages. os-prober suggests no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJZNHjXAAoJEOPRqa2O3KuKcVMP/0Ad2IjgqvOCVuQgu3aSmc4P 390JFx8OPEBNh0C8OAEy+1d4EhKi2n50nvMUBy8Kg3iNpKBdwEgTAnGe3P35wkHZ QKW4deSvHLg0jutuodiLzANTdc7UKGwpF1js3oEB73Yrg1WOyj+0uLGMGnwnu3a7 uYWzuwyZlRaBenMAFD52Uov6zUNo7i/LTUwUIXI4qzGtycHkYVZhLPe6XolnfK/w BMugsTxWC4a7Y5d0WK/eQn1qEkqaB5NHV3OWgVnzhKqSAZa3ucnSyETAHgp/aJZT S2+WNsNEC3t1nZdQz5gmzK1bGn6AmmSIS1RMO2n20Ih/e+7gbfbqSo3WETwFuX+o LGefi+PFp5Jv9524e2T2DTPwfTFfvaes2+L5NFlvWV6oYf2rXLdt6Ky5wWJJBhg6 illjQVOGAwwkbEdB3xlv+zjx91vgrbQKhE2XN2eHcM0xIhd84BEuvnyOBK7BL07Z PuF0+FfAHNYi/jra6Q+0Ddtuc2QS/tkEJ+kYCn5TU+c6d0265sBCM3lQueNj4Tdz 4lPsd6AHOYL7l03XQ0i0+IifnYWAV97l2oauKToIujaBcTfJ9VoDS++Jik1UrXwE o9KNQJQ8gq7wRpeKTZr+fmiUulfvXId2ETXXnSTbfJvv2hJJpjtGBnq1jHsWb219 8DgV9lKM1ys/brYwq/NU =aTuF -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#688336:
Forget about all of this, I'm going to simplify the design. I have in mind to make the following changes. 1. Don't just change $1 from being the path of a block device to being a reserved word. a. Instead append an additional parameter. 2. Use subvolume id, instead of names.
Bug#688336:
The patches have changes that have nothing to do with btrfs, I'll attempt to isolate these.
Bug#688336:
The patches introduce a bug. /usr/lib/os-probes/50mounted-tests calls fs_type on "btrfs" I'll look into this some more.
Bug#688336:
Refresh and simplify the patches. https://github.com/cheako/os-prober/tree/btrfs-subvol Also note os-probe fork: https://github.com/campadrenalin/os-prober/commit/b571c0c7c3fe8986cc17dd200173fb7d86ef0c24 This commit reorgs the project making merges with the fork difficult. From af1753acff410e6984466f88233855ad971cbc87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael MestnikDate: Tue, 30 May 2017 00:15:36 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add support for btrfs subvol. --- README.btrfs | 15 common.sh| 13 ++- linux-boot-prober| 133 ++- linux-boot-probes/mounted/common/40grub2 | 12 ++- os-prober| 28 ++- os-probes/common/50mounted-tests | 72 - os-probes/mounted/common/90linux-distro | 8 +- 7 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) create mode 100644 README.btrfs diff --git a/README.btrfs b/README.btrfs new file mode 100644 index 000..f9b4d45 --- /dev/null +++ b/README.btrfs @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +BTRFS is a new filesystem which combines the filesystem with logical volume +management (subvolumes). For further information, see: + https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page + https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ + +In order to support BTRFS, a number of changes were necessary to os-prober, +os-probes/common/50mounted-tests, os-probes/mounted/common/90linux-distro, +linux-boot-prober, and linux-boot-probes/common/50mounted-tests. + +The biggest impact will be to grub2 where there is additional information +output by os-prober and where, if a BTRFS subvolume is being used for root, +the parameters for linux-boot-prober have changed. + +Sun 30 Dec 2012 11:49:52 AM EST Gene Czarcinski + diff --git a/common.sh b/common.sh index e1646d4..4045d05 100644 --- a/common.sh +++ b/common.sh @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ parse_proc_mounts () { done } +# add forth parameter to pickup btrfs subvol info parsefstab () { while read -r line; do case "$line" in @@ -165,12 +166,22 @@ parsefstab () { set -f set -- $line set +f -printf '%s %s %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3" +printf '%s %s %s %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3" "$4" ;; esac done } +#check_btrfs_mounted $bootsv $bootuuid) +check_btrfs_mounted () { + bootsv="$1" + bootuuid="$2" + bootdev=$(blkid | grep "$bootuuid" | cut -d ':' -f 1) + bindfrom=$(grep " btrfs " /proc/self/mountinfo | + grep " $bootdev " | grep " /$bootsv " | cut -d ' ' -f 5) + printf "%s" "$bindfrom" +} + unescape_mount () { printf %s "$1" | \ sed 's/\\011/ /g; s/\\012/\n/g; s/\\040/ /g; s/\\134/\\/g' diff --git a/linux-boot-prober b/linux-boot-prober index e32dc84..2a60fa2 100755 --- a/linux-boot-prober +++ b/linux-boot-prober @@ -5,16 +5,143 @@ set -e newns "$@" require_tmpdir +ERR="n" + +tmpmnt=/var/lib/os-prober/mount +if [ ! -d "$tmpmnt" ]; then + mkdir "$tmpmnt" +fi + +mounted= +bootmnt= +bootsv= +bootuuid= grep "^/dev/" /proc/mounts | parse_proc_mounts >"$OS_PROBER_TMP/mounted-map" || true -partition="$1" +if [ -z "$1" ]; then + ERR=y +elif [ "$1" = btrfs -a -z "$2" ]; then + ERR=y +elif [ "$1" = btrfs -a -z "$3" ]; then + ERR=y +elif [ "$1" = btrfs ]; then + type=btrfs + echo "$2" | grep -q "^UUID=" || ERR=y + echo "$3" | grep -q "^subvol=" || ERR=y + export "$2" + export "$3" + partition=$(blkid | grep "$UUID" | cut -d ':' -f 1 | tr '\n' ' ' | cut -d ' ' -f 1) + debug "btrfs: partition=$partition, UUID=$UUID, subvol=$subvol" +else + partition="$1" + type=other +fi -if [ -z "$partition" ]; then +if [ "x$ERR" != xn ]; then echo "usage: linux-boot-prober partition" >&2 + echo " linux-boot-prober btrfs UUID=<> subvol=<>" >&2 exit 1 fi +if [ "$type" = btrfs ]; then + # handle all of the btrfs stuff here + if [ ! -e "/proc/self/mountinfo" ]; then + warn "/proc/self/mountinfo does not exist, exiting" + umount "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null + rmdir "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null + exit 1 + fi + mpoint=$(grep "btrfs" /proc/self/mountinfo | grep " /$subvol " | grep " $partition " | cut -d ' ' -f 5) + if [ "$mpoint" = "/" ]; then + warn "specifying active root not valid, exiting" + umount "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null + rmdir "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null + exit 1 + fi + if [ "$mpoint" = "$tmpmnt" ]; then + warn "btrfs subvol=$subvool, UUID=$UUID, already mounted on $tmpmnt **ERROR**" + umount "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null + rmdir "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null + exit 1 + fi + if [ -z "$mpoint" ]; then + # mount the btrfs root + if ! mount -o subvol=$subvol -t btrfs -U $UUID "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null; then + warn "error mounting btrfs subvol=$subvol UUID=$UUID" + umount "$tmpmnt/boot" 2>/dev/null + umount "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null + rmdir "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null + exit 1 + fi + else + # bind-mount + if ! mount -o bind "$mpoint" "$tmpmnt" 2>/dev/null; then + warn "error mounting btrfs bindfrom=$mpoint subvol=$subvol UUID=$UUID" +
Bug#863688: os-prober: Source has witespace at end of lines.
Package: os-prober Version: 1.75 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please consider using some form of source buitification or tidy to remove this whitespace. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (490, 'testing'), (480, 'unstable'), (470, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-19-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages os-prober depends on: ii grub-common 2.02~beta3-5 ii libc62.24-9 os-prober recommends no packages. os-prober suggests no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJZLQOhAAoJEOPRqa2O3KuKipcP/Ru3sg/RzqRZjRe/uaxL320j pS2xfJiYDM+d4gXWLCwc/Pjb6NzXol382IxnFnz9x1O9SXvjyvOwibvZq0t33B4r XWU5dewcWC69LclmdVtnbprzHnaGF/Cxc7tRODqNqUi3O4G94k9T6HkXhi0wZaJX zkUk3XrR5AOOmyeD7VA1m762GXDKvYuYQu+p18iw29ZZEucahXnQJd091STfgng1 VHt9JA8Zqxgs+9OdBr5T8Ypv6yhZunohpIZjvZ79VZmBoxJH/dX9YA919tufKbQx JOZl12BsvtZVFFUXIQnoQK9Mbzlvq36xRTUUJjWXKrmR2XVDwj9MDL6SFDQzu1c1 4RBwPfl6ZXYeTCOKO24IlMzZYC3g9ECPn8X/+tfEBPGiLLx07ucFnUzRzm2UF2jO f6wWoc/gBfXjIYzr82LDMM0dd6N32EoJ9hq+ErYzPGOFBGjRd5XelKat4cciZ6rg TZX8HMF0HCuIRuPjoFyXLZNvQNbcLcvqAc5HTIKsOCH/qOtwb4EJYr41zT/h3NmZ BxmQJZqhKc09Fzg47Suc99qiT5jZAdpWw/JMzaLmbFWYFYkD/mxHap3UroJSHuou xr8lSLUEAq0YcyWZMSpvXivvaYJYs1D/uLnkRPaocRfl58Pf0wzuwl+kLAFj0pUv 55YW9FAESj6krRSZEunl =dMfT -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#863651: debian-installer: no bcache support
Package: debian-installer Version: 20170525 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I created bcache backing store and was unable to install into it. - -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.7 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (490, 'testing'), (480, 'unstable'), (470, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-19-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJZLGirAAoJEOPRqa2O3KuKr5UQAK+I+38SE53oBM2UNH5QUymQ 11fGPcQvHOqpKkocHMFq78rXUavwTc/+TwICzn/jnt/+Lho2AGtZDW/BB9hmRDCd 4bA6jEqEv4oAkQsZLggMxC7YK6KDlkRvb8/hJJNx1nErUAKXq3copgGLQdLlJNnR iMtfYf+HEtdROZqJd8VoY5zYhmy0y991iiqEePC1HcfdTnOESnGD8hAKWqE7FNm0 Jf2PyAmw5mAANT8ocHlglFxFZ9jBPXrUvTL82jqB/P8dEDvTzQVc0RorRHq7Gtci qLrNSoKSaKAnuXNec/OOXWtjU7NuwXNz6SE0JDXIIoWkPFeT2f5R+ZkqOvJXceuY l9KigA0ELsMp3+7pSkVnstECgutzdN93WGGtCTO2ubuSNkoQO5bRGjuGv/Hf4c/q iDFiuzxBxZYFQtspDOBs99b0n12o6JIzjIJBtHXh1RO0i60MwlHDOKvGAtNGfSpd Hs4fwEKJ3G3a/k+gtd3EG+yGYkdIhRrfmATM5cCNfWaDSbKBHm0oOnzE66MRrdte oduMyvObPiWdq5vajl7O9jJQnes9/LJiJT8Xz1cQhzBXiebr/fMUq3h4Yi67T7qW F/bAkRnMCnDTSj36ps1FxQJe0ElC5ylP46x9IgKH0qDeItaR0yniGIpJoSen4AE5 7xPOqhsOc+alGG8GmyzV =UmYJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#809611: d-i fails to boot on HP mv2120
OK Martin, that image worked. I did a full install of Debian Stretch from it. Below is the output at the tail end of bootup and login. Debian GNU/Linux stretch/sid backup ttyS0 backup login: root Password: Linux backup 4.6.0-1-marvell #1 Debian 4.6.4-1 (2016-07-18) armv5tel The 0x60 change also still continues to boot my existing Debian Jessie install. Thanks for the work you do to keep these old pieces of NAS hardware working. Mike On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > * Mike Thompson <mpthomp...@gmail.com> [2016-08-05 20:23]: > > The good news is that given the load address change from 0x40 to > > 0x60 allowed the MV2120 to boot into the ssh based installer. > > Great! > > > The bad news is the installed failed from what looked like some sort of > > segmentation faults in the installer from the looks of the logs which I > > included below. > > I wonder if this is the same as > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833599 > > Can you please test this image: > http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/ > installer-armel/current/images/orion5x/network- > console/hp/mv2120/netboot.img > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > http://www.cyrius.com/ >
Bug#809611: d-i fails to boot on HP mv2120
1:50:27 netcfg[1396]: DEBUG: Success! Aug 6 21:50:28 main-menu[989]: (process:1395): udhcpc (v1.22.1) started Aug 6 21:50:28 main-menu[989]: (process:1395): Sending discover... Aug 6 21:50:28 main-menu[989]: (process:1395): Sending select for 192.168.0.8... Aug 6 21:50:28 main-menu[989]: (process:1395): Lease of 192.168.0.8 obtained, lease time 3600 Aug 6 21:50:28 main-menu[989]: DEBUG: resolver (libgcc1): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 6 21:50:28 main-menu[989]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:50:28 main-menu[989]: INFO: Menu item 'network-console' selected Aug 6 21:50:49 sshd[1498]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22. Aug 6 21:50:49 apt-install: Queueing package openssh-server for later installation Aug 6 21:50:55 sshd[1516]: WARNING: /etc/ssh/moduli does not exist, using fixed modulus Aug 6 21:51:05 sshd[1516]: Accepted password for installer from 192.168.0.160 port 56579 ssh2 Aug 6 21:51:05 sshd[1518]: lastlog_openseek: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog: No such file or directory Aug 6 21:51:05 sshd[1518]: lastlog_openseek: Couldn't stat /var/log/lastlog: No such file or directory Aug 6 21:51:07 debconf: Setting debconf/language to en Aug 6 21:51:11 debconf: Setting debconf/priority to low Aug 6 21:51:11 debconf: Setting debconf/language to en Aug 6 21:51:11 main-menu[1531]: DEBUG: resolver (libgcc1): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 6 21:51:11 main-menu[1531]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:51:11 main-menu[1531]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:51:13 main-menu[1531]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:51:13 main-menu[1531]: INFO: Menu item 'choose-mirror' selected Aug 6 21:51:13 main-menu[1531]: WARNING **: Unable to set title for choose-mirror. Aug 6 21:51:14 anna-install: Queueing udeb apt-mirror-setup for later installation Aug 6 21:51:14 main-menu[1531]: (process:1557): Segmentation fault Aug 6 21:51:14 main-menu[1531]: WARNING **: Configuring 'choose-mirror' failed with error code 139 Aug 6 21:51:14 main-menu[1531]: WARNING **: Menu item 'choose-mirror' failed. Aug 6 21:51:14 main-menu[1531]: WARNING **: Unable to set title for choose-mirror. Aug 6 21:51:14 main-menu[1531]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: DEBUG: resolver (libgcc1): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: INFO: Menu item 'choose-mirror' selected Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: WARNING **: Unable to set title for choose-mirror. Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: (process:1587): Segmentation fault Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: WARNING **: Configuring 'choose-mirror' failed with error code 139 Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: WARNING **: Menu item 'choose-mirror' failed. Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: WARNING **: Unable to set title for choose-mirror. Aug 6 21:51:28 main-menu[989]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:52:22 main-menu[989]: INFO: Modifying debconf priority limit from 'high' to 'medium' Aug 6 21:52:22 debconf: Setting debconf/priority to medium Aug 6 21:52:22 main-menu[989]: DEBUG: resolver (libgcc1): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 6 21:52:23 main-menu[989]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:52:23 main-menu[989]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:52:34 main-menu[989]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for choose-mirror Aug 6 21:52:34 main-menu[989]: INFO: Menu item 'save-logs' selected Aug 6 21:53:08 kernel: [ 218.089782] TCP: request_sock_TCP: Possible SYN flooding on port 80. Sending cookies. Check SNMP counters. Aug 6 21:53:25 kernel: [ 234.906280] TCP: request_sock_TCP: Possible SYN flooding on port 80. Sending cookies. Check SNMP counters. ----- On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> wrote: > Mike, can you please give these instructions a go? This is what I > intend to post to the mv2120 list. > > -- > > Mike Thompson reported that Debian stretch (the upcoming Debian 9) > doesn't boot on the HP mv2120 anymore. I don't know how many Debian > users are left who run Debian on their mv2120. I gave away my device > several years ago. Recently I bought an mv2120 from eBay in order to > debug this issue. > > While I found a solution, it requires users to change a setting on their > device. Please make sure to make this change, otherwise your device > will no longer b
Bug#809611: d-i fails to boot on HP mv2120
Hi Martin, Sure. It may take me a few days to get some time, but I'll give it a try and let you know how it goes. Mike On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> wrote: > Mike, can you please give these instructions a go? This is what I > intend to post to the mv2120 list. > > -- > > Mike Thompson reported that Debian stretch (the upcoming Debian 9) > doesn't boot on the HP mv2120 anymore. I don't know how many Debian > users are left who run Debian on their mv2120. I gave away my device > several years ago. Recently I bought an mv2120 from eBay in order to > debug this issue. > > While I found a solution, it requires users to change a setting on their > device. Please make sure to make this change, otherwise your device > will no longer boot when you upgrade to Debian 9. > > The new settings are compatible with Debian 8 (jessie) and Debian 9 > (stretch), so I suggest you make the changes now. > > If you have serial console access to the mv2120, you can run some > commands in u-boot. Simply interrupt the boot process by pressing a key > and type the following: > > setenv loadAddr 0x060 > setenv bootcmd 'bootext2 0,1:1,2 0x060 /boot/uImage /dev/sda > /dev/sdb' > saveenv > > If you don't have a serial console, you can make the changes from within > Debian. Run the following commands: > > cat >/etc/fw_env.config < /dev/mtd0 0x0 0x1000 0x2 > EOF > > fw_setenv loadAddr 0x060 > fw_setenv bootcmd "bootext2 0,1:1,2 0x060 /boot/uImage /dev/sda > /dev/sdb" > > This will create a config file so you can modify the u-boot environment > and use fw_setenv to update two boot variables. > > Once you made the changes, upgrades to Debian 9 should work fine and you > can also use the Debian installer if you want to perform a new > installation. > > Please note that Debian 9 will be the last release to support the HP > mv2120. > > -- > > Note that the installer from > > https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/orion5x/network-console/hp/mv2120/netboot.img > will not boot right now with these settings. However, you can change the > loadAddr to 0x050 and it should work. I just commited a fix in Git so > it should work in a day or so with 0x060. > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > http://www.cyrius.com/ >
Bug#826511: Aarch64 QEMU Bug
Package: debian-installer Version: 20160516+b1 Installing Debian using QEMU aarch64 (and looks like arm as well) requires extra steps due to lack of initrd and kernel support for virtio devices. While there is a workaround documented below, this seems like something that should be added to the distro build to incorporate support directly. https://gmplib.org/~tege/qemu.html See block 14. Best, Mike
Bug#826173: Debian Testing/Unstable MIPS Installer Kernel Panic
Good call on the CPU. Here's what I was using to run it: qemu-system-mips64 -M malta -kernel vmlinux-4.5.0-2-4kc-malta -initrd initrd.gz -hda hda.img -append root=/dev/ram console=ttyS0 -m 1G -nographic After adding the -cpu option you mentioned it started up without issue. Thanks! Mike On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > On 2016-06-03 19:03, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: reassign -1 debian-installer 20160516+b1 > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 08:48 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > control: reassign -1 src:linux 4.5.4-1 > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:13:04PM -0400, Mike wrote: > > > > Package: kernel > > > > > > this is not a valid package name. > > > > > > > Version: Testing > > > > > > and this is not a valid version > > > > > > > > > > > I am working on installing Debian under a QEMU MIPS emulator. I was > able to > > > > get the Debian Stable branch to install and run properly using this: > > > > > > > > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/installer-mips/current/images/malta/netboot/ > > > > > > > > However, when I attempt to use unstable or testing, I receive a > kernel > > > > panic immediately on boot for install. I cannot really give a > package name > > > > because it appears there's a problem in the kernel or init somewhere. > > > > > > > > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-mips/current/images/malta/netboot/ > > > > > > > > The error I get it as follows: > > > > [2.463767] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! > > > > exitcode=0x0004 > > > > [2.463767] > > > > [2.464725] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to > kill init! > > > > exitcode=0x0004 > > > > That usually means something is wrong with the initrd. So reassigning > > to the installer. > > It would be interested to know which QEMU command you used to start this > image. Since the switch to GCC 5, the mips architecture requires a R2 > CPU. > > QEMU defaults emulating a R2 CPU in 32-bit mode, but a R1 CPU in 64-bit > mode. In the later case try to pass "-cpu 5KEf" to QEMU. > > Aurelien > > -- > Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B > aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net >
Bug#826173: Debian Testing/Unstable MIPS Installer Kernel Panic
I've discovered that the corresponding mipsel testing and development releases work fine. Its only the mips testing and development versions. On Jun 3, 2016 2:18 PM, "Ben Hutchings" <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 14:07 -0400, Mike wrote: > > I set the memory to 1024. I can try higher if need be. > > That should be more than enough. > > Ben. > > -- > Ben Hutchings > Nothing is ever a complete failure; it can always serve as a bad > example. >
Bug#826173: Debian Testing/Unstable MIPS Installer Kernel Panic
I set the memory to 1024. I can try higher if need be. On Jun 3, 2016 2:04 PM, "Ben Hutchings" <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 19:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: reassign -1 debian-installer 20160516+b1 > > > > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 08:48 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > control: reassign -1 src:linux 4.5.4-1 > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:13:04PM -0400, Mike wrote: > > > > Package: kernel > > > > > > this is not a valid package name. > > > > > > > Version: Testing > > > > > > and this is not a valid version > > > > > > > > > > > I am working on installing Debian under a QEMU MIPS emulator. I was > able to > > > > get the Debian Stable branch to install and run properly using this: > > > > > > > > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/installer-mips/current/images/malta/netboot/ > > > > > > > > However, when I attempt to use unstable or testing, I receive a > kernel > > > > panic immediately on boot for install. I cannot really give a > package name > > > > because it appears there's a problem in the kernel or init somewhere. > > > > > > > > > http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/installer-mips/current/images/malta/netboot/ > > > > > > > > The error I get it as follows: > > > > [2.463767] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! > > > > exitcode=0x0004 > > > > [2.463767] > > > > [2.464725] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to > kill init! > > > > exitcode=0x0004 > > > > That usually means something is wrong with the initrd. So reassigning > > to the installer. > > *Or* the VM is too small for the kernel to even unpack the initrd. I > think that may be true with the default QEMU memory size now. > > Ben. > > > Ben. > > > > > > At no point do I get to a location in the installer for me to > interact with. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > Ben Hutchings > > Nothing is ever a complete failure; it can always serve as a bad > > example. > -- > Ben Hutchings > Nothing is ever a complete failure; it can always serve as a bad > example. >
Bug#792152: PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames not used in installed /etc/network/interfaces
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD (virtual) Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso Date: July 11, 2015 Machine: VirtualBox VM Processor: Intel Core i7-2600K Memory: 512 MB Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 ext4 1931600 825488989940 46% / udev devtmpfs 10240 0 10240 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 101264 4472 96792 5% /run tmpfs tmpfs 253156 0253156 0% /dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs 253156 0253156 0% /sys/fs/cgroup Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] [8086:1237] (rev 02) 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] [8086:7000] 00:01.1 IDE interface [0101]: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE [8086:7111] (rev 01) Kernel driver in use: ata_piix 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Graphics Adapter [80ee:beef] 00:03.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller [8086:100e] (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation PRO/1000 MT Desktop Adapter [8086:001e] Kernel driver in use: e1000 00:04.0 System peripheral [0880]: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Guest Service [80ee:cafe] 00:05.0 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: Intel Corporation 82801AA AC'97 Audio Controller [8086:2415] (rev 01) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:] Kernel driver in use: snd_intel8x0 00:06.0 USB controller [0c03]: Apple Inc. KeyLargo/Intrepid USB [106b:003f] Kernel driver in use: ohci-pci 00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI [8086:7113] (rev 08) 00:0d.0 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 82801HM/HEM (ICH8M/ICH8M-E) SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [8086:2829] (rev 02) Kernel driver in use: ahci Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: Network non-functional after first boot, but works during install. Problem appears to be that network interface is called eth0 in /etc/network/interfaces, but name after first boot is enp0s3. This is shell-only install. Reinstalled several times, it's reproduced 100% of the time. Problem seems to be related to this: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ I switched to terminal during install, and 80-net-setup-link.rules is not under /lib/udev/rules.d. So during install network interface is still called eth0, could that be the problem? If I switch to terminal during install and do: ln -s /dev/null /target/etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules then old network names are used after first boot and network starts ok. But that's a step backwards... proper thing would be if the network name written to /target/etc/network/interfaces is correct on first boot. Alternatively if I change eth0 to enp0s3 in /etc/network/interfaces after install, then ifup, that also fixes it. My /etc/network/interfaces at first boot looks like: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). source /etc/network/interfaces.d/* # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface allow-hotplug eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp
Bug#775120: task-mate-desktop: Should install mate-system-tools
Hi Jean-Philippe, On Mo 11 Mai 2015 20:33:58 CEST, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: Le 11/05/2015 09:37, Samuel Thibault a écrit : Mike Gabriel, le Mon 11 May 2015 03:27:17 +, a écrit : * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Once the system boots, after lightdm, I want to change password, set the date, network, etc. through a GUI.r * What was the outcome of this action? No item appears for this. I only can use CLI tools. Fix: add mate-system-tools in installed packages. Looks to me that mate-desktop-environment should pull it instead? What's your stance on this? Furthermore, mate-system-tools will be deprecated for MATE 1.10. What replaces it? Does MATE not provide anything to accomplish those tasks? In Debian Jessie, no. Not adding the package means the user cannot change his passwd, network, etc through GUI. I don't know what will be with 1.10, but in stable, this package is needed. If the package is needed: $ sudo apt-get install mate-system-tools The issues with mate-system-tools, I have are: o not well tested inside Debian o not needed on enterprise sites (they are useless with LDAP, Kerberos, etc.). So what you can convince me of is adding mate-system-tools to Suggests: in mate-desktop-environment-extras, but that does not make a change for the installation procedure and won't be much appreciated by the Debian release team either, I guess. I'd say, we should compensate this via documentation, how about helping out with improving [1] and mentioning mate-system-tools there? light+love, Mike [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Mate -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb pgptL3891ZuJ4.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Bug#775120: task-mate-desktop: Should install mate-system-tools
Hi Cyril, On Fr 08 Mai 2015 23:21:08 CEST, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hello MATE people, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2015-01-11): Jean-Philippe MENGUAL te...@accelibreinfo.eu (2015-01-11): Package: task-mate-desktop Version: 3.29 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I choosed, in the installer, MATE and desktop. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Once the system boots, after lightdm, I want to change password, set the date, network, etc. through a GUI.r * What was the outcome of this action? No item appears for this. I only can use CLI tools. * What outcome did you expect instead? In System - Admin, I should have items to accomplish such tasks. *** End of the template - remove these template lines *** Fix: add mate-system-tools in installed packages. Looks to me that mate-desktop-environment should pull it instead? What's your stance on this? Mraw, KiBi. mate-system-tools has been added last minute to the set of available MATE packages in Debian (that's is the reason why id did not get added as dep to any of the meta packages). Furthermore, mate-system-tools will be deprecated for MATE 1.10. Thus, I'd suggest closing this bug with won't fix for stretch/unstable. And for jessie, the issue is not severe enough to justify a j-p-u upload IMHO. Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb pgpHHxzAQHDnF.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Bug#773763: Acknowledgement (task-mate-desktop: Should install libreoffice-gnome)
Control: tag -1 patch On Di 06 Jan 2015 21:07:10 CET, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: Just a precision: actually libreoffice-gnome installs libreoffice-gtk, it's a dependency. And it's libreoffice-gtk which is responsible for accessibility it LO. It can be installed without libreoffice-gnome, it works. A .debdiff is attached to this mail. The MATE packaging team will highly appreciate it if one of the tasksel maintainers fixes this accessibility issue in tasksel-mate-desktop on our behalf. THANKS in advance!!! Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb diff -Nru tasksel-3.29/debian/changelog tasksel-3.29+nmu1/debian/changelog --- tasksel-3.29/debian/changelog 2014-10-21 17:21:08.0 +0200 +++ tasksel-3.29+nmu1/debian/changelog 2015-01-07 11:35:18.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +tasksel (3.29+nmu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + + * task-mate-desktop: Provide out-of-the box libreoffice accessibility +with orca by installing libreoffice-gtk. (Closes: #773763). + + -- Mike Gabriel sunwea...@debian.org Wed, 07 Jan 2015 11:34:03 +0100 + tasksel (3.29) unstable; urgency=high * Gnome only works on i386 and amd64, so default to xfce on other arches. diff -Nru tasksel-3.29/debian/control tasksel-3.29+nmu1/debian/control --- tasksel-3.29/debian/control 2014-09-24 22:19:56.0 +0200 +++ tasksel-3.29+nmu1/debian/control 2015-01-07 11:33:49.0 +0100 @@ -281,6 +281,8 @@ network-manager-gnome, # orca works with mate, adding accessability gnome-orca, +# make libreoffice accessible with orca + provide a GTK'ish design in libreoffice + libreoffice-gtk, Package: task-laptop Architecture: all pgphJzD2tC617.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Bug#772441: installation-reports: successful jessie install on ASUS Eee PC 901
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Completely successful netinst install of jessie beta 2 on my ASUS Eee PC 901. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: netinst Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/jessie_di_beta_2/i386/iso-cd/debian-jessie-DI-b2-i386-netinst.iso Date: 2014-12-06T17:44:54-0500 Machine: ASUS Eee PC 901 Partitions: Filesystem Type 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/eeepc--vg-root ext4 3361360 2428120742776 77% / udev devtmpfs 10240 0 10240 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 204336 21484182852 11% /run tmpfs tmpfs 510832 220510612 1% /dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs 5120 0 5120 0% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs 510832 0510832 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/sda1 ext2240972 29654198877 13% /boot /dev/mapper/eeepc--usr-usr ext4 15378836 3231988 11342600 23% /usr tmpfs tmpfs 102168 12102156 1% /run/user/119 tmpfs tmpfs 102168 20102148 1% /run/user/1000 Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: No problems encountered. Caveats: * Made a separate /usr partition on the secondary internal flash disk (sdb) to accomodate the size of a default desktop install. * Installed over the network using wired network, wifi requires non-free firmware in the firmware-ralink package. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=8 (jessie) - installer build 20141002 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux eeepc 3.16-2-486 #1 Debian 3.16.3-2 (2014-09-20) i686 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GSE Express Memory Controller Hub [8086:27ac] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:830f] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: agpgart-intel lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GSE Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27ae] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:830f] lspci -knn: 00:02.1 Display controller [0380]: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:27a6] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:830f] lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family High Definition Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:831a] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family PCI Express Port 1 [8086:27d0] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family PCI Express Port 2 [8086:27d2] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family PCI Express Port 3 [8086:27d4] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.3 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family PCI Express Port 4 [8086:27d6] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:27c8] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:830f] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:27c9] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:830f] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation NM10/ICH7 Family USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:27ca] (rev 02) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device
Bug#761598: task-mate-desktop: pull in lightdm
Package: tasksel Version: 3.24 Tag: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-mate-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi Joey, SynrG on IRC made me aware of MATE not pulling in any display manager when installed via a MATE-flavoured livebuild. As the MATE pkg-team doesn't want to attach a display manager to close to the mate meta packages (a desktop environment does not necessarily require a display manager to be usable - e.g. when used via X2Go or VNC, nor does it require a local X11), we'd appreciate it if the display manager (preferably lightdm) could be pulled in via tasksel (task-mate-desktop). I hope the attached patch is ok. (Does tasksel allow x-display-manager | lightdm in Recommends: field?). Thanks+Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb diff -Nru tasksel-3.24/debian/changelog tasksel-3.25/debian/changelog --- tasksel-3.24/debian/changelog 2014-09-10 00:19:19.0 +0200 +++ tasksel-3.25/debian/changelog 2014-09-14 23:22:41.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +tasksel (3.25) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Pull-in a display manager via task-mate-desktop (preferably lightdm, +but any other DM that provides x-display-manager is fine). + + -- Mike Gabriel sunwea...@debian.org Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:21:39 +0200 + tasksel (3.24) unstable; urgency=medium * Add missing dependency task-cinnamon-desktop - task-desktop diff -Nru tasksel-3.24/debian/control tasksel-3.25/debian/control --- tasksel-3.24/debian/control 2014-09-10 00:16:21.0 +0200 +++ tasksel-3.25/debian/control 2014-09-14 23:17:00.0 +0200 @@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ task-desktop, mate-desktop-environment, Recommends: +# the MATE desktop environment packages don't pull in a +# display manager, doing it in task-mate-desktop instead. + x-display-manager | lightdm, # temporarily moved from task-desktop due to #525077 gimp, # Package management. pgpMbaylv5fU7.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Bug#712696: marked as done (debian-installer: Add Cinnamon and Mate as alternative DEs.)
clone #712696 -1 reopen -1 retitle #712696 Add task for Cinnamon desktop environment retitle -1 Add task for MATE desktop environment tag -1 patch thanks Hi Stevem, hi Joey, On Mo 08 Sep 2014 22:52:24 CEST, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 07/09/14 19:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: tasksel (3.22) unstable; urgency=medium * Add task-cinnamon-desktop. Thanks, Margarita Manterola. Closes: #712696 Bug #712696 also mentioned the MATE desktop, but AFAICT no task was added for it yet. If someone wants that to happen, they must put together a metapackage (something similar to cinnamon-desktop-enironment) as was requested here: https://bugs.debian.org/712696#80 Regards, patch attached to make MATE selectable via Tasksel. Hope the format is ok. Thanks+Greets, Mike -- For Debian Frontdesk: mike gabriel aka sunweaver (Debian Developer, Member of Frontdesk) GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31 mail: sunwea...@debian.org, http://sunweavers.net diff -Nru tasksel-3.22/debian/changelog tasksel-3.23/debian/changelog --- tasksel-3.22/debian/changelog 2014-09-07 18:26:27.0 +0200 +++ tasksel-3.23/debian/changelog 2014-09-09 23:07:57.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +tasksel (3.23) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Add task-mate-desktop. Thanks, Mike Gabriel. + + -- Mike Gabriel sunwea...@debian.org Tue, 09 Sep 2014 23:07:21 +0200 + tasksel (3.22) unstable; urgency=medium * Avoid using each() on a hash ref, which causes perl to output a diff -Nru tasksel-3.22/debian/control tasksel-3.23/debian/control --- tasksel-3.22/debian/control 2014-09-07 18:24:51.0 +0200 +++ tasksel-3.23/debian/control 2014-09-09 23:04:44.0 +0200 @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ # The order here is significant when installing this task manually; # when tasksel installs this task it instead selects one of these based # on the tasksel/desktop debconf setting. - task-xfce-desktop | task-gnome-desktop | task-kde-desktop | task-lxde-desktop | task-cinnamon-desktop, + task-xfce-desktop | task-gnome-desktop | task-kde-desktop | task-lxde-desktop | task-cinnamon-desktop | task-mate-desktop, # For use by third-party apps. xdg-utils, # mdns/zeroconf stuff @@ -248,6 +248,36 @@ Depends: ${misc:Depends}, cinnamon-desktop-environment +Package: task-mate-desktop +Architecture: all +Description: MATE desktop environment + This task package is used to install the Debian desktop, featuring + the MATE desktop environment, and with other packages that Debian users + expect to have available on the desktop. +Depends: ${misc:Depends}, +mate-desktop-environment, +Recommends: +# temporarily moved from task-desktop due to #525077 +gimp, +# Package management. +synaptic, +# firefox (ne iceweasel) is the most popular web browser at the moment, +# although both gnome and kde offer their own too +iceweasel, +# libreoffice is the best word processor / office suite at the moment +libreoffice, +libreoffice-gcj, +# make help menu work +libreoffice-help-en-us, +# make thesaurus work +mythes-en-us, +# make spellchecker work +hunspell-en-us, +# make hyphenation work +hyphen-en-us, +# we need a working network setup at least +network-manager-gnome + Package: task-laptop Architecture: all Description: laptop diff -Nru tasksel-3.22/tasks/mate-desktop tasksel-3.23/tasks/mate-desktop --- tasksel-3.22/tasks/mate-desktop 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ tasksel-3.23/tasks/mate-desktop 2014-09-09 23:06:16.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +Task: mate-desktop +Relevance: 8 +Section: user +Enhances: desktop +Test-preferred-desktop: mate +Key: + task-mate-desktop pgpXMXi4CJPm5.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Bug#758116: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel
Hi Jonas, hi all, On Do 28 Aug 2014 18:39:34 CEST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: ...another more descriptive, I believe, answer could be You don't really have a Debian Edu system when installing it on a Debian system. I believe that second elaborated view is the reason for Mike's question. To me it is far from perfectly sense to offer Debian Edu in debian-installer to get some educational software - I would expect to get a Debian Edu system. - Jonas That's what I was aiming at! Jonas, thanks for reading inbetween my lines and verbalizing the unsaid. :-) We are currently testing deployment of Debian Edu systems by installing vanilla Debian and then pulling in required packages on post-installation. The results will come in by the end of next week (once I have time for looking at finalizing those installations). There are packages in debian-edu SVN [1] (educlient, eduroaming) that have some post-installation logic turning a Debian system into a Skolelinux / Debian Edu system, as well. I will probably take a look at those, as well, during our test cycle. Originally, they were designed to turn Ubuntu systems into Debian Edu client machines AFAIR. So let's see. But still, I guess it is pointless offering a Debian Edu blend in D-I if the result after installation won't be a proper Debian Edu workstation. Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb pgp6I3lcHC3oM.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Bug#758116: Please be verbose whether you would like to get your Blend promoted by tasksel
Hi Andreas, [taking all lists except debian-blends and debian-edu off the loop...] On Di 26 Aug 2014 13:27:23 CEST, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at DebConf[1]. I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised the question about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I answered all in the list of the bug report #758116 which IMHO fits the criterion of actively maintained and some valuable content for users. I think it should be also a criterion that the team behind the Blend confirms that they are interested and so I'm hereby pinging all lists in question to ask you for confirmation. I have set Reply-To to the bug report and the general Blends list in case you are interested in further discussion with other Blends. Any input is welcome to make sure users will realise the fruits of your great work at the earliest point in time. Kind regards Andreas. I guess this only makes sense if a Debian Edu machine (standalone) can be installed via Debian's normal D-I, right? @Petter: is that possible? Do you know? Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, herweg 7, 24357 fleckeby fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148 GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb pgp0rBzjiiUJm.pgp Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
Bug#747045: base-installer: Install hangs when attempting to format EFI system partition
Package: base-installer Severity: important Dear Maintainer, When installing on an EFI based computer, the installation will hang while attempting to format an EFI system partition. If the partition already exists and is already formatted, the install proceeds normally. I have seen this behavior on two EFI based systems with very different hardware (A desktop PC and a Macbook). -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140505000751.26138.90793.report...@server.lan
Bug#714092: installation-reports: wheezy install on QNAP TS-212 fails to write to flash
: Committed_AS: 26144 kB /proc/meminfo: VmallocTotal: 753664 kB /proc/meminfo: VmallocUsed:2056 kB /proc/meminfo: VmallocChunk: 747260 kB /proc/bus/input/devices: I: Bus=0019 Vendor=0001 Product=0001 Version=0100 /proc/bus/input/devices: N: Name=gpio-keys /proc/bus/input/devices: P: Phys=gpio-keys/input0 /proc/bus/input/devices: S: Sysfs=/devices/platform/gpio-keys/input/input0 /proc/bus/input/devices: U: Uniq= /proc/bus/input/devices: H: Handlers=kbd event0 /proc/bus/input/devices: B: PROP=0 /proc/bus/input/devices: B: EV=3 /proc/bus/input/devices: B: KEY=100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 /proc/bus/input/devices: -- mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130625165449.ga7...@xps14z.home.local
Bug#703470: UEFI USB stick installation fails on HP EliteBook 8570p
have you been able to test either patch now? Not yet, dealing with Xen issues. Had to abandon UEFI because of Xen incompatibility. See my Xen bug. Probably deserves a warning in the d-i manual. Also busy setting up the system. Would like to actually *use* my computer for a change -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130331055052.ga32...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#704191: HP EliteBook 8570p BIOS-GPT install fails
Package: installation-reports Boot method: ISO on USB stick on USB 2.0 port Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 2013-03-29 Machine: HP EliteBook 8570p (C6Z56UT) Processor: Intel Core i5-3320M Memory: 4 GiB Partitions: # df -Tl | human rootfs rootfs / udev devtmpfs /dev tmpfstmpfs/run /dev/mapper/___-root ext4 / - dm_crypt tmpfstmpfs/run/lock tmpfstmpfs/run/shm /dev/sda_ext4 /boot /dev/sda_vfat /boot/efi - ESP Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[E] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: Xen currently seems not to function with the 3.2.39 kernel for the dom0 on a UEFI system, so I can't use UEFI. This is an attempt to use a GPT-partitioned disk with BIOS. This assumes a Boot Mode of Legacy. (HP startup screen Startup Menu BIOS Setup System Configuration Boot Options) Boot to the Startup Menu, F9 Boot Device Options, choose USB Hard Drive 1, Advanced options, Expert install. Following the advice of http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata : When there is more than one disk available during installation (for example one hard disk and one USB stick, as it is commonly the case when booting the installer from a USB stick), grub-install may run into problems: it was reported several times, that the GRUB bootloader was installed onto the USB stick instead of the hard disk containing the newly-installed system. To avoid running into this, make sure to answer No when the following question is asked during the installation process: Install the GRUB boot loader to the master boot record?; it should be possible to specify the right device at the next step: Device for boot loader installation. or not, the result is the same: The d-i seems to think that GRUB succeeded in the console: grub-installer: Installation finished. No error reported. grub-installer: info: grub-install ran successfully But rebooting fails to find boot code, gives HP screen: BootDevice Not Found Please install an operating system on your hard disk. [...] Rebooting the USB stick to rescue mode, I umount the /boot and /boot/efi partitions--because mount thinks they're mounted--before I truly mount them. Running grub-install /dev/sda appears to succeed, but rebooting yields the same HP screen. From rescue mode, aptitude install gdisk on the target system, to confirm that the biosgrub partition has GUID code 21686148-6449-6e6f-744e-656564454649. So BIOS-GPT GRUB installation doesn't work, and I have no idea how to force it to. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130329070549.ga30...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#704191: HP EliteBook 8570p BIOS-GPT install succeeds, with bootable flag
Control: retitle -1 HP EliteBook 8570p BIOS-GPT install succeeds, with bootable flag But rebooting fails to find boot code, gives HP screen: BootDevice Not Found Please install an operating system on your hard disk. [...] With hints from http://www.rodsbooks.com/gdisk/bios.html this can be made to work. In rescue mode, use fdisk to set the bootable flag on the one partition in the protective MBR. Rebooting boots into GRUB/Linux. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130329073522.ga30...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#704191: HP EliteBook 8570p BIOS-GPT install succeeds, with bootable flag
Xen/Linux also runs properly with this configuration. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130329083838.ga30...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#703470: UEFI USB stick installation fails on HP EliteBook 8570p
You could try it yourself using the attached patch and the instructions at http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official. These instructions don't work. One needs to aptitude install dpkg-dev to get dpkg-source before apt-get source linux. Then apt-get install build-essential fakeroot isn't needed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130327070523.ga26...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#703469: HP EliteBook 8570p UEFI install works, with some effort
I managed to get the USB storage working, so that I could grab the lspci output. 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor DRAM Controller [8086:0154] (rev 09) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor PCI Express Root Port [8086:0151] (rev 09) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI Host Controller [8086:1e31] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 [8086:1e3a] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] 00:16.3 Serial controller [0700]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family KT Controller [8086:1e3d] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] Kernel driver in use: serial 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection [8086:1502] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] Kernel driver in use: e1000e 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 [8086:1e2d] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family High Definition Audio Controller [8086:1e20] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:1e10] (rev c4) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 2 [8086:1e12] (rev c4) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 3 [8086:1e14] (rev c4) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.3 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 4 [8086:1e16] (rev c4) Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 [8086:1e26] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation QM77 Express Chipset LPC Controller [8086:1e55] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] 00:1f.2 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 7 Series Chipset Family 6-port SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [8086:1e03] (rev 04) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] Kernel driver in use: ahci 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Thames [Radeon 7500M/7600M Series] [1002:6841] Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a9] Kernel driver in use: radeon 01:00.1 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Turks/Whistler HDMI Audio [Radeon HD 6000 Series] [1002:aa90] Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a9] Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel 24:00.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: JMicron Technology Corp. IEEE 1394 Host Controller [197b:2380] (rev 30) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] Kernel driver in use: firewire_ohci 24:00.1 System peripheral [0880]: JMicron Technology Corp. SD/MMC Host Controller [197b:2392] (rev 30) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] Kernel driver in use: sdhci-pci 24:00.2 SD Host controller [0805]: JMicron Technology Corp. Standard SD Host Controller [197b:2391] (rev 30) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:17a7] 25:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6205 [Taylor Peak] [8086:0082] (rev 34) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6205 AGN [8086:1301] Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi
Bug#703470: UEFI USB stick installation fails on HP EliteBook 8570p
Control: retitle -1 UEFI USB stick installation fails to detect its media on a USB 3.0 port As mentioned in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703469 , I was able to install by booting without EFI. While having problems getting that system to recognize a USB stick that I plugged in, it occurred to me that I was using one of the USB 3.0 ports. A USB 2.0 port recognizes the device. Applying the same idea to this bug, I got the d-i to work just as well in EFI mode on a USB 2.0 port. I booted the existing system by choosing F9 Boot Device Options from the Startup Menu, then External USB Hard Drive (as opposed to USB Hard Drive 1 - ...). I stopped after configuring the network, since I don't want to destroy the system I've already installed. So the remaining issue is that the d-i doesn't find the installation media in a USB 3.0 port. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130326214131.ga24...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#703469: HP EliteBook 8570p UEFI install works, with some effort
dmesg output truncated after the USB stuff. There are two USB 2.0, one USB 2.0/eSATA, and two USB 3.0 ports on the hardware. [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [0.00] Linux version 3.2.0-4-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3-15) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.2.39-2 [0.00] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.2.0-4-amd64 root=/dev/mapper/laptop-root ro quiet [0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: [0.00] BIOS-e820: - 000a (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0010 - bdcf3000 (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: bdcf3000 - beebc000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: beebc000 - befbc000 (ACPI NVS) [0.00] BIOS-e820: befbc000 - befff000 (ACPI data) [0.00] BIOS-e820: befff000 - bf00 (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e820: e00f8000 - e00f9000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: fed1c000 - fed2 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: ffee - ffeff000 (reserved) [0.00] BIOS-e820: 0001 - 00013e00 (usable) [0.00] NX (Execute Disable) protection: active [0.00] EFI v2.10 by HPQ [0.00] ACPI=0xbeffe000 ACPI 2.0=0xbeffe014 SMBIOS=0xbe56b698 [0.00] Kernel-defined memdesc doesn't match the one from EFI! [0.00] EFI: mem00: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0x-0x1000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem01: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x1000-0x00058000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem02: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0x00058000-0x00059000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem03: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x00059000-0x0007d000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem04: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0x0007d000-0x0007e000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem05: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0x0007e000-0x000a) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem06: type=2, attr=0xf, range=[0x0010-0x003b) (2MB) [0.00] EFI: mem07: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x003b-0x00c0) (8MB) [0.00] EFI: mem08: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0x00c0-0x0100) (4MB) [0.00] EFI: mem09: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x0100-0x36958000) (857MB) [0.00] EFI: mem10: type=2, attr=0xf, range=[0x36958000-0x374a4000) (11MB) [0.00] EFI: mem11: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x374a4000-0x88ddc000) (1305MB) [0.00] EFI: mem12: type=2, attr=0xf, range=[0x88ddc000-0xb6cf4000) (735MB) [0.00] EFI: mem13: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xb6cf4000-0xb6d14000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem14: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xb6d14000-0xb80be000) (19MB) [0.00] EFI: mem15: type=1, attr=0xf, range=[0xb80be000-0xb80db000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem16: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0xb80db000-0xb8604000) (5MB) [0.00] EFI: mem17: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xb8604000-0xb9ce4000) (22MB) [0.00] EFI: mem18: type=3, attr=0xf, range=[0xb9ce4000-0xb9cf3000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem19: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xb9cf3000-0xb9da) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem20: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xb9da-0xba6e4000) (9MB) [0.00] EFI: mem21: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xba6e4000-0xba6e5000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem22: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xba6e5000-0xba736000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem23: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xba736000-0xba737000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem24: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xba737000-0xbbdce000) (22MB) [0.00] EFI: mem25: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbdce000-0xbbdd8000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem26: type=2, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbdd8000-0xbbdde000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem27: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbdde000-0xbbddf000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem28: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbddf000-0xbbde1000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem29: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbde1000-0xbbde4000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem30: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbde4000-0xbbde7000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem31: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbde7000-0xbbe04000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem32: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbe04000-0xbbe06000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem33: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbe06000-0xbbecb000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem34: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0xbbecb000-0xbbecc000) (0MB) [0.00] EFI: mem35: type=4, attr=0xf,
Bug#703470: UEFI USB stick installation fails on HP EliteBook 8570p
Ben Hutchings wrote: However, the lspci output you attached to #703469 shows that the xHCI does not have a driver bound to it. Perhaps the kernel log (from dmesg) would explain why. Thanks Ben. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703469#25 request interrupt 255 failed? That's the dmesg output from the running (non-Xen, that's another bug) system, not from the UEFI d-i. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130327042309.gb25...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#703469: HP EliteBook 8570p UEFI install works, with some effort
Package: installation-reports Boot method: ISO on USB drive Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 2013-03-19 Machine: HP EliteBook 8570p (C6Z56UT) Processor: Intel Core i5-3320M Memory: 4 GiB Partitions: # df -Tl | human rootfs rootfs / udev devtmpfs /dev tmpfstmpfs/run /dev/mapper/___-root ext4 / - dm_crypt tmpfstmpfs/run/lock tmpfstmpfs/run/shm /dev/sda_ext4 /boot /dev/sda_vfat /boot/efi - ESP Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[E] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: In order to document this failure mode, I made this installation attempt on a system that I cleaned after a successful installation. So it isn't quite the same as a brand-new machine. At the HP startup screen, hit ESC for the Startup Menu, F10 for BIOS Setup, in System Configuration tab, Boot Options, change Boot Mode from Legacy to UEFI Hybrid (With CSM). (I made other, irrelevant, settings changes, too.) Reboot to the Startup Menu, F9 for Boot Device Options, choose USB Hard Drive 1, Advanced options, Expert install. The Installer seemed to think that GRUB succeeded: grub-installer: info: grub-install ran successfully. But rebooting fails to find boot code, gives HP screen: BootDevice Not Found Please install an operating system on your hard disk. etc. Rebooting the USB stick to rescue mode, I umount the /boot and /boot/efi partitions--because mount thinks they're mounted--before I truly mount them. Then I install grub-efi-amd64, and: # grub-install /dev/sda Fatal: Couldn't open either sysfs or procfs directories for accessing EFI variables. Try 'modprobe efivars' as root. Fatal: Couldn't open either sysfs or procfs directories for accessing EFI variables. Try 'modprobe efivars' as root. Installation finished. No error reported. # modprobe efivars ERROR: could not insert 'efivars': Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) # dmesg | tail -1 [...] efivars: Unknown symbol efi_enabled_facility (err 0) I assume that's because I haven't booted the USB stick in UEFI mode. So mkdir /boot/efi/EFI/boot and cp -p /boot/efi/EFI/debian/grubx64.efi /boot/efi/EFI/boot/bootx64.efi (Thanks to http://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article51/debian-efi.) and reboot. That boots to the GRUB menu, followed by: Booting 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 error: file not found. error: file not found. Loading Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 ... Loading initial ramdisk ... Press any key to continue... error: no suitable mode found. Booting however and no further output. Rebooting to USB stick rescue mode again, dpkg-reconfigure grub-efi-amd64 which now decides to add insmod efi_gop and insmod efi_uga to /boot/grub/grub.cfg. Why didn't it do it when I installed the package? Then reboot. login: Side note: Why isn't Debian or GRUB in http://www.uefi.org/specs/esp_registry? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130320002524.ga9...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#703470: UEFI USB stick installation fails on HP EliteBook 8570p
Package: installation-reports Boot method: ISO on USB drive Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 2013-03-19 Machine: HP EliteBook 8570p (C6Z56UT) Processor: Intel Core i5-3320M Memory: 4 GiB Partitions: none (erased MBR GPT) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [E] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: In order to document this failure mode, I made this installation attempt on a system that I cleaned after a successful installation. So it isn't quite the same as a brand-new machine. At the HP startup screen, hit ESC for the Startup Menu, F10 for BIOS Setup, in System Configuration tab, Boot Options, change Boot Mode from Legacy to UEFI Hybrid (With CSM). (I made other, irrelevant, settings changes, too.) System now boots automatically from the USB stick. For a second I see the message: Welcome to GRUB! error: prefix is not set. in the top left of the screen, then the graphical D-I menu comes up. Choose Advanced options, Expert install. At Detect and mount CD-ROM, get a message that No common CD-ROM drive was detected., prompt to Load CD-ROM drivers from removable media? Saying Yes gets Cannot read removable media, or no drivers found. Returns to the main menu. Saying No, gets No common CD-ROM drive was detected., prompt to Manually select a CD-ROM module and device?. Say No, the step fails; say Yes and enter /dev/sda (the only present removable device), also fails. Returns to the main menu. In the screen prompting You may switch to the shell on the second terminal (ALT+F2), ALT+F2 toggles the appearance of a few raster lines at the top of the screen--mostly black, one part red, two white dots flashing--nothing more. (In Rescue mode, it gives a proper shell prompt.) I don't see any mention of installing to a UEFI/GPT system under http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/. See bug #703469 for the workaround. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130320012136.ga9...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#703469: HP EliteBook 8570p UEFI install works, with some effort
Ben Hutchings wrote: At a guess, this option might result in booting the installer in legacy mode. See the next bug #703470 for why I boot legacy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130320022933.ga9...@64-142-29-25.dsl.static.sonic.net
Bug#683867: grub-installer: Fails to install grub: line 45: syntax error: unexpected else
Package: grub-installer Version: 1.76 Severity: important Tags: patch Installation with the daily build from August 3 fails at grub-installer. (process:26576): /usr/bin/grub-installer: line 45: syntax error: unexpected else (expecting then) WARNING **: Configuring 'grub-installer' failed with error code 2 WARNING **: Menu item 'grub-installer' failed. Simple syntax typo, attached patch fixes (patched while installing and installation succeeded). -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) From adab600b7412379da97e13e12d87bbe6a547bc53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Miller mtmil...@ieee.org Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 18:57:23 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix shell unexpected else syntax error --- grub-installer |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/grub-installer b/grub-installer index 768fbed..a0a4d8c 100755 --- a/grub-installer +++ b/grub-installer @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ info architecture: $ARCH local initial_proc_contents=$(ls $ROOT/proc) if [ -z $initial_proc_contents ]; then info Mounting /proc into $ROOT - if [ $(udpkg --print-os) = kfreebsd ]; + if [ $(udpkg --print-os) = kfreebsd ]; then mount -t linprocfs proc $ROOT/proc else mount -t proc proc $ROOT/proc -- 1.7.10.4
Bug#675294: installation-reports: No disk drive was detected during 6.0 install
Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable While installing squeeze from a netinstall cd, after entering the user name and password, the message No disk drive was detected came up with a list of driver names. The drive is a new SATA 6.0Gb/s on an Intel DZ68BC mother board + I5-2500K processor. The blue SATA cable was wired to the SATA 6 connector on the MoBo. The fix was to use a red SATA cable wired to the SATA 3.0 connector during the install. Afterwards, the 6.0 connection fails -- grub starts and lets me select the Debian entry or the recovery entry, but the boot fails with a message that it cannot find /dev/disk/by-uuid/15f48ced-09a9-43a7-be73-c0fd7554dc14 . Switching back to the 3.0 connector lets me run the system, which is a get-around I'm using now. I'm guessing there isn't SATA 6.0 support. Package-specific info: Boot method: cd Image version: 6.0.5 AMD64 netinstall Date: Date and time of the install Machine: Intel DZ68BC mother board + I5-2500K processor Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00035b26 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 262 2103296 82 Linux swap / Solaris Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda2 * 262 524 2097152 83 Linux Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda32873940152428800 83 Linux /dev/sda49401 40986 253710337f W95 Ext'd (LBA) Partition 4 does not start on physical sector boundary. /dev/sda59401 22455 10482 83 Linux /dev/sda6 22455 2882851197646 83 Linux /dev/sda7 28829 3490748827392 83 Linux /dev/sda8 34907 4098648827392 83 Linux /dev/sda8 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [E] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [E] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments and ideas you had during the initial install. Before I installed squeeze, I installed Suse 12.1 on /dev/sda2, Xubuntu 12.04 on /dev/sda6, Ubuntu 12.04 on /dev/sda7 All worked with the 6.0 SATA connection. I strongly suspect they benefit from using Linux kernel 3.2.0 . -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20110106+squeeze4+b1 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux foveal5 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:00:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Sandy Bridge DRAM Controller [8086:0100] (rev 09) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:201c] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Sandy Bridge PCI Express Root Port [8086:0101] (rev 09) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Sandy Bridge Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0112] (rev 09) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:201c] lspci -knn: 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation Cougar Point HECI Controller #1 [8086:1c3a] (rev 04) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:201c] lspci -knn: 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82579V Gigabit Network Connection [8086:1503] (rev 05) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:201c] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: e1000e lspci -knn: 00:1a.0
Bug#673110: debian-installer: wheezy installer on macmini3, 1 should run gptsync before reboot
Package: debian-installer Version: 20110106+b1 Severity: normal Tags: d-i Dear Maintainer, I recently re-installed after replacing a drive on macmini3,1 which worked nearly flawlessly except that I needed to drop to a shell and install gptsync and run it during the now we'll reboot dialog at the end. I believe this is needed if anything was changed in partitioning. Of course, one may run gptsync from rEFIt or the Mac OS X installer instead, but since gptsync is packaged and works fine it would be great to just run it. I note that guided partitioning used a biosgrub partition, which is needed for bios compatibility mode on mac hardware, from what I gather. The installer also selected grub-pc, which would be correct for bios compatibility -- however, the MBR needs to be correct for (at least) the default Apple bootloader to try. I had rEFIt installed on a USB key, and was installing from a (different) USB key but wanted to do away with rEFIt (and OS X) for this one. Otherwise, the installer worked great, and continues to look better and better. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120516081605.19088.60302.report...@pangea.cg.shawcable.net
Bug#671751: installation-reports: wheezy nearly works on macmini3, 1 except for missing gptsync
Package: installation-reports Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Overall, the wheezy installer works great on macmini3,1 with the exception of syncing GPT/MBR partition tables for default-bootloader-based booting. -- Package-specific info: Boot method: USB Image version: hd-media wheezy daily build from May 1, 2012 Date: Date and time of the install Machine: macmini3,1 Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred gfdisk --list /dev/sda reports: Disk /dev/sda: 750 GB, 750153761280 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 18001 83 Linux Warning: Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda2 * 1 32 249007 83 Linux Warning: Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda3 * 32 63 249007 83 Linux Warning: Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary. /dev/sda4 63 91202 732074017 83 Linux df -Tl reports: Filesystem Type 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on rootfs rootfs682892580 409831340 238881556 64% / udevdevtmpfs3949748 0 3949748 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs791256972790284 1% /run /dev/mapper/pangea-root ext4 682892580 409831340 238881556 64% / tmpfs tmpfs 5120 4 5116 1% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs 1582508 763596818912 49% /tmp tmpfs tmpfs 1582508 16 1582492 1% /run/shm /dev/sda2 ext2 234297 18237203560 9% /boot Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: If you edit the partitions at all, with at least the newer macmini3,1 firmware, the default Apple bootloader (hold option to get to it) won't recognize the debian (biosgrub) bootloader until you run gptsync. This can be done from rEFIt, for example, but it's also in Debian so dropping to a shell and doing the following immediately before reboot is a good workaround for now: chroot /target apt-get install gptsync gptsync /dev/sda It seems the installer is already detecting we're on an EFI-based mac since it's setting up the required biosgrub partition properly. Guided partitioning also works well. I was installing this time with no OS X partition at all. Note that the lack of GPT/MBR syncing won't be quite as much of an issue if you're using a bootloader like rEFIt. Also note there's a ~30 second pause (grey screen) on boot if they only bootable partition is an (un-blessed) Debian system. Below, I don't know where the installer version information comes from, but I definitely downloaded a wheezy daily build. If there's a way to get the version off the image itself, I can still do that. Note that I did not yet install B43 firmware for the wireless and that I upgraded the RAM to 8GB. Overall, the installer just keeps getting better and better! One suggestion I have is to do something when you select a menu item from the main menu as it sort of seems like it's just hanging currently. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=5.0 (lenny) - installer build 20090123lenny4 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom == Installer hardware-summary: == umame -a: Linux pangea 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Aug 19 22:33:18 UTC 2009 x86_64 unknown lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: nVidia Corporation Device [10de:0a82] (rev b1) lspci -knn: 00:00.1 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation Device [10de:0a88] (rev b1) lspci -knn: 00:03.0 ISA bridge [0601]: nVidia Corporation Device [10de:0aae] (rev b2) lspci -knn: 00:03.1 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation Device [10de:0aa4] (rev b1) lspci -knn: 00:03.2 SMBus [0c05]: nVidia Corporation Device [10de:0aa2] (rev b1) lspci -knn: 00:03.3 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia
Bug#641685: Debian Installer writes false network configuration
Package: debian-installer Version: not sure - used as installer on debian-6.0.2.1-amd64-netinst.iso Short: When you change your network configuration twice during installation only the first (and surely false) one is written to system. Long: You install - after you let the installer send DHCP requests you're able to provide your IP address information. If you have a typo or (like me) choose the wrong net, the installer is unable to connect to the mirrors. So I went back to Configure Network and provided the right address, net and router. Installation went fine and i rebooted. First thing after reboot i wanted to install some packages and was very surprised to see, that my very first and false information was written to /etc/network/interfaces. I hope these are all the information you may need. regards, -AmP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91f056db-58e4-4edd-b858-0736d8a49...@ampersize.org
Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac
On 10/08/11 6:55 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote: reassign 637284 installation-reports thanks Installation reports (failure or success) should not be reported against the Work Needing and Prospective Packages virtual package, but against installation-reports. Ah, thanks Gergely -- I'm still new to this :-) -- Mike. It can then be reassigned from there to the appropriate package, if confirmed. I have reassigned the report to installation-reports, so it gets forwarded to the right place. -- --- Mike Horemike_h...@aapt.net.au --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e424bd5.4080...@aapt.net.au
Bug#618929: Additional info
It is certainly possible that my CD drive is flaky. Do you know of a diagnostic test in the Debian release that I could use to simply read several known good CDs for errors? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Miguel Figueiredo [mailto:el...@debianpt.org] Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 10:21 AM To: Tremblay, Mike A Cc: 618...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#618929: Additional info Hi, according to the log you sent grub was successfully installed: Mar 25 17:22:36 grub-installer: info: Installing grub on '/dev/sda' Mar 25 17:22:37 grub-installer: info: grub-install supports --no-floppy Mar 25 17:22:37 grub-installer: info: Running chroot /target grub-install --no-floppy --force /dev/sda Mar 25 17:22:57 grub-installer: Installation finished. No error reported. Mar 25 17:22:57 grub-installer: info: grub-install ran successfully Mar 25 16:55:48 kernel: [ 3697.543489] sr 1:0:1:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE Mar 25 16:55:48 kernel: [ 3697.543539] sr 1:0:1:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current] Mar 25 16:55:48 kernel: [ 3697.543587] Info fld=0x504c0, ILI Mar 25 16:55:48 kernel: [ 3697.543661] sr 1:0:1:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Illegal mode for this track Mar 25 16:55:48 kernel: [ 3697.543740] sr 1:0:1:0: [sr0] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 05 04 c0 00 00 02 00 Mar 25 16:55:48 kernel: [ 3697.543823] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1315584 On your log there are also several read errors from the CD used to install the system. This could be due to bad hardware, bad disk or even a driver issue. The read errors can lead to unexpected result. I would be great if you burn an image on a cd-recorder /disc known to work properly and verify if the burned cd is properly written/read before installing. You can also use a daily image with a newer kernel, those are available on: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/is o-cd/ Also Debian 6.0 got an update: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.1a/i386/iso-cd/ -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org This message and any enclosures are intended only for the addressee. Please notify the sender by email if you are not the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute this message or its contents or enclosures to any other person and any such actions may be unlawful. Ball reserves the right to monitor and review all messages and enclosures sent to or from this email address. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7575324f915a05448800386f6ceaf3670e049...@aeromsg2.aero.ball.com
Bug#618929: Additional info
I have discovered, purely by accident, that if I have my Windows 98 O/S disc in the CD drive as the Linux system is powering up, a program on the Win98 disc will gain control and offer me the choices Boot from Hard disc, or Boot from CD ROM. On selecting the Hard disc choice, the Linux systems boots. I briefly see the GRUB prompt on the screen as the process starts, but it quickly scrolls off as the other start-up messages are output. I would rather the system start without the need for a CD in the drive. Mike This message and any enclosures are intended only for the addressee. Please notify the sender by email if you are not the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute this message or its contents or enclosures to any other person and any such actions may be unlawful. Ball reserves the right to monitor and review all messages and enclosures sent to or from this email address.
Bug#618929: Debian bootup/install bug report
Package: Installer Problem: Will not boot after installation System: ~2000 vintage HP Vecta XU, 6/200, system D4365N, dual Pentium II processors, 64 MB RAM, three hard drives - 200G IDE, two 1.3 G SCSI (Quantum Fireball), network card, no USB The most common outcome of an installation session is that the bootup step at the end of the session results in the letters GRUB appearing in the upper left corner of the screen with the blinking cursor to the right of the B, and nothing else. The system does not respond to any keystrokes, or combination of CTRL-key, ALT-key, etc. It seems like the system is waiting for keyboard input, but the keyboard is not enabled. If I had a responsive keyboard AND I knew what to type, this could be an acceptable outcome, since it does occur most times. What I've tried: All combinations of discs (all three drives plugged in, each one separately, all combinations of two drives). The drives all appear to be accessed but the boot ultimately fails as described above. I've tried most combinations of answering the partitioning questions and placement of the boot sector. The failures are not all as stated above; it's just the most common outcome. Other results are GRUB being continuously written to the screen, until I power off. I was able to get the boot to succeed once, but that particular system build led to other problems causing me to attempt a second install. This one time the result was that the system would, after powering on and all the verbiage of the boot up process, presents me with a login prompt, accepts my login and allows me to use the system. I was able to run with this system for a couple of weeks, loading packages, etc. until I filled the discs and had to start over. The disc full issue occurred because the IDE drive (most of the system's capacity) was not mounted. I did not realize this until the disc full failure. The version of Debian is 2.4. I have a 15 CD set, purchased in roughly 2004. Last week I downloaded disc image 1 of Debian 6.0 in hopes that the boot problem has been fixed, but the results are the same. Thanks, Mike Tremblay
Bug#554896: closed by Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org ()
this bug persists - the recommended RC also FAILED to Install with this network card in place. The installation freezes at network device detection. mike This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the installation-reports package: #554896: installation-reports It has been closed by Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org by replying to this email. -- 554896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554896 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1bf9168b8aeda1ed1d90ffef7b5818be.squir...@mmail.virtdom.com
Bug#608850: Unable to continue without a bootloader
Package: live-installer While testing an install of squeeze_live_beta2 I was unable to continue without a bootloader. When selecting Continue without boot loader or going directly to Finish the installation then selecting Continue without boot loader you are brought back to the menu. You cannot finish the installation until you select either grub (or potentially lilo although I did not test that). kthxbye ~Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikhaojq2gnibkff_a+2kyigchgqfzg=vupco...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#602292: Squeeze disk detection failed on MacBook Air 11.6
This is a bug in the Debian installer; for some reason it doesn't include the ata_generic driver. Thanks for the clarification! Another bugreport regarding this was sent a week ago, including a patch: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605325 -- mike dentifrice fl...@poivron.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101203124410.ga31...@dentifrice
Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression with ext4
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:18:17AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: What's going on here? sync_file_range() is a Linux specific system call that has been around for a while. It allows program to control when writeback happens in a very low-level fashion. The first set of sync_file_range() system calls causes the system to start writing back each file once it has finished being extracted. It doesn't actually wait for the write to finish; it just starts the writeback. Hmm, ok so what about posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) instead, skimming over the kernel source seems to indicate it might end up doing more or less the same thing but in a portable way? On the other hand, there is no guarantee that other kernels do the same, nor that Linux will keep doing it in the future. Using sync_file_range and possibly the corresponding BSD syscall seems a better solution. (and apparently the assumption with fadvise doesn't work with xfs) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101130090755.ga8...@glandium.org
Re: Bug#605009: serious performance regression with ext4
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:35:11AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Mike Hommey, le Tue 30 Nov 2010 10:07:55 +0100, a écrit : On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:18:17AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: What's going on here? sync_file_range() is a Linux specific system call that has been around for a while. It allows program to control when writeback happens in a very low-level fashion. The first set of sync_file_range() system calls causes the system to start writing back each file once it has finished being extracted. It doesn't actually wait for the write to finish; it just starts the writeback. Hmm, ok so what about posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) instead, skimming over the kernel source seems to indicate it might end up doing more or less the same thing but in a portable way? On the other hand, there is no guarantee that other kernels do the same, Err, that's posix. Being posix doesn't guarantee that posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) is going to start write back, which is the desired effect, but not what you may actually get, depending on the kernel. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101130103043.ga9...@glandium.org
Re: Bug#603578: installation-reports: Fails to boot after successful install on a btrfs root
I have the same problem. Btrfs in the initramfs depends on crc32c, but that module is not included in the initramfs image. I am not sure of the sequence of events and how that is missed but the bottom line is that crc32c.ko needs to be listed as a dependency and included. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ce79fba.4030...@tiedyenetworks.com
Bug#604176: kernel-wedge: add ralink wireless drivers to nic-wireless-modules
Package: kernel-wedge Version: 2.71 Severity: normal Tags: d-i patch Please add rt61pci, rt73usb, rt2860sta, and rt2870sta to nic-wireless-modules. I have two systems with perfect wifi operation once the system is installed, provided firmware-ralink is also installed. However I cannot test the beta installer over wifi because the drivers are not loaded. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages kernel-wedge depends on: ii debhelper 8.0.0 helper programs for debian/rules ii make 3.81-8 An utility for Directing compilati kernel-wedge recommends no packages. kernel-wedge suggests no packages. Index: kernel-wedge/modules/nic-wireless-modules === --- kernel-wedge/modules/nic-wireless-modules (revision 65711) +++ kernel-wedge/modules/nic-wireless-modules (working copy) @@ -23,8 +23,10 @@ rt2500pci ? rt2500usb ? rt2400pci ? -# rt61pci - needs firmware -# rt73usb - needs firmware +rt61pci ? +rt73usb ? +rt2860sta ? +rt2870sta ? # Crypto modules needed for ieee80211 WEP support ecb ?
Bug#603021: installation-reports: UI doesn't update while downloading packages in tasksel
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I observed the same behavior on my install. I switched to VT-2 and confirmed the installer was downloading packages but no progress bar or status was shown on the graphically installer until it completely finished installing all packages. - mike -- Package-specific info: Boot method: USB Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_beta1/amd64/iso-cd /debian-squeeze-di-beta1-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 2010-11-14 15:35:15 -0500 Machine: Custom ASUS P5QL PRO / Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU E5200 Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [ ] Detect network card:[ ] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Clock/timezone setup: [ ] User/password setup:[ ] Install tasks: [ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[ ] Comments/Problems: Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments and ideas you had during the initial install. -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20101020 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=hd-media == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux tesla 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 15 00:56:30 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset DRAM Controller [8086:2e20] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d3] lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port [8086:2e21] (rev 03) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:3a37] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:3a38] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 [8086:3a39] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1a.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:3a3c] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) HD Audio Controller [8086:3a3e] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82fe] lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:3a40] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.5 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) PCI Express Root Port 6 [8086:3a4a] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 [8086:3a34] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 [8086:3a35] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 [8086:3a36] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1d.7 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #1 [8086:3a3a] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:82d4] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1e.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge [8086:244e] (rev 90) lspci -knn: 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 82801JIB (ICH10) LPC Interface Controller [8086:3a18] lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043
Bug#603685: Missing Chinese, Japanese and Korean characters in Select your location list
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:39:02PM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote: Package: debian-installer Version: 20101116-3 daily snapshot Severity: important In graphical installer, if I choose Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Japanese or Korean as the language, there will be some missing characters in the next page (Selection your location). Please see the attached screenshots and notice the unicode squares. Moreover, on your screenshots, we can see at least two fonts being used in the same sentence. This makes my eyes bleed. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101116115611.ga3...@glandium.org
Bug#601011: debootstrap: Fails without an error when it can't create devices
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.25 Severity: important When debootstrap can't extract devices.tar.gz for some reason, it exists with an error code 2, but doesn't say anything as to why it failed. Following with strace, it appears the one failing is tar, because it can't extract (mknod) the devices from devices.tar.gz. This happened on my system because I was trying to debootstrap from within an lxc instance created with the default template which disabled a whole bunch of devices. Please at least handle the error and display tar's error message. A bonus point if you just ignore the error, as the failing devices here were really not important to the chroot: dev/full dev/kmem dev/loop* dev/mem dev/port dev/ram* Cheers, Mike -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii wget 1.12-2.1 retrieves files from the web Versions of packages debootstrap recommends: ii gnupg 1.4.10-4 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep debootstrap suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022130428.16347.31045.report...@jigen.glandium.org
Bug#571136: please remove useless devices from devices.tar.gz
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 07:58:17PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.20 Severity: normal devices.tar.gz should contain only the devices which are strictly needed, even if udev is not installed the others can be created by makedev. At least the ram* devices should be removed because they were needed by initrds and are not useful anymore. Why create loop*? Why create mem kmem core port? FYI, the only devices needed by udev to start are null and console. FWIW, the inclusion of these devices in devices.tar.gz makes debootstrap fail without even a message (filed a separate bug for that) when tar can't mknod the devices (which happens from within a lxc container with the default template). Note cdebootstrap either doesn't create them or doesn't care if it can't create them. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022130650.ga16...@glandium.org
Bug#601011: debootstrap: Fails without an error when it can't create devices
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:04:28PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.25 Severity: important When debootstrap can't extract devices.tar.gz for some reason, it exists with an error code 2, but doesn't say anything as to why it failed. Following with strace, it appears the one failing is tar, because it can't extract (mknod) the devices from devices.tar.gz. This happened on my system because I was trying to debootstrap from within an lxc instance created with the default template which disabled a whole bunch of devices. Please at least handle the error and display tar's error message. A bonus point if you just ignore the error, as the failing devices here were really not important to the chroot: dev/full dev/kmem dev/loop* dev/mem dev/port dev/ram* FWIW, cdebootstrap doesn't create these expect dev/full, which it fails to create but doesn't care. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022131903.ga16...@glandium.org
Bug#597799: installation-report: GPT related issues
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:28:45PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:39:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: The disk is a new one, though I didn't check if there was a pre-existing partitioning (but I really doubt it). OTOH, the disk is 2000GB, which is not quite over 2TB, but close enough that it may have mattered. Certainly MBR partitions do not work when you pass 2TB (2^32 512byte sectors). After all if it had a partition table already, it would have just used it. Well, 2000GB should still work with MBR partitions. Now so far I have been running a few machines with GPT partitions on a 2.5TB raid for a few years and with grub2 it works just fine, even with a machine that just uses a plain old BIOS. The point is, grub just works, if I don't forget to create a small boot partition, which I didn't know I had to create until grub-setup failed because of the lack of it. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100924062633.ga3...@glandium.org
Bug#597799: installation-report: GPT related issues
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:38:09AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: Disk /dev/sda: 2250.1 GB, 2250128752640 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 273562 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 267350 2147483647+ ee EFI GPT So I would say there is no requirement for a /boot partition. There might be a requirement for /boot to not be on LVM. Not sure. I probably haven't made myself clear enough. I was not talking about a /boot partition, but about a GPT grub boot partition, or whatever grub called it in its grub-setup failure message. One you give a bios_grub flag. But then, maybe your core.img is small enough to fit in the 17.4kB before the first partition. Here it doesn't. I made the boot partition 128kB big because I didn't have a clue and found that to be enough in most cases through a google search, though seeing the size of my current core.img, 32 or 64kB would have been enough. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100924163127.ga9...@glandium.org
Bug#597799: installation-report: GPT related issues
Package: installation-reports Version: 2.42 Severity: important Tags: squeeze -- Package-specific info: Boot method: network Image version: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/gtk/netboot.tar.gz 17:58 26-06-10 Date: 22-09-2010 Machine: Custom-made i7 machine Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[E] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [E] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: First, a little digression about the network card. The on-board network controller is a Realtek controller for which the installer told me I needed a non-free firmware. It happens that answering No left the network... working. It would have been helpful if the installer told me the network may still work without the firmware. Back to the core of my issues. I went through a manual partitionning, and didn't create a boot partition for the grub core image, assuming I was creating an MBR partition. It turned out, in the end, that GRUB failed because of that, because the partition table was GPT. I didn't see anything about GPT being used (or maybe wasn't paying too much attention), and surely the partitioner could issue a warning that no such partition was created and that the risk is that GRUB can't be installed. Other than that, everything went fine. Awesome installer. Thanks Mike -- Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. Please compress large files using gzip. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org. == Installer lsb-release: == DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux installer DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0 (squeeze) - installer build 20100912 X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=netboot-gtk == Installer hardware-summary: == uname -a: Linux goemon 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 12 13:01:50 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Core Processor DMI [8086:d131] (rev 11) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7588] lspci -knn: 00:03.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Core Processor PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:d138] (rev 11) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:08.0 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Core Processor System Management Registers [8086:d155] (rev 11) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Device [0062:0088] lspci -knn: 00:08.1 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Core Processor Semaphore and Scratchpad Registers [8086:d156] (rev 11) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Device [0062:0088] lspci -knn: 00:08.2 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Core Processor System Control and Status Registers [8086:d157] (rev 11) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Device [0062:0088] lspci -knn: 00:08.3 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Core Processor Miscellaneous Registers [8086:d158] (rev 11) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Device [0062:0088] lspci -knn: 00:10.0 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Core Processor QPI Link [8086:d150] (rev 11) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Device [0062:0088] lspci -knn: 00:10.1 System peripheral [0880]: Intel Corporation Core Processor QPI Routing and Protocol Registers [8086:d151] (rev 11) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Device [0062:0088] lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset USB2 Enhanced Host Controller [8086:3b3c] (rev 05) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7588] lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Definition Audio [8086:3b56] (rev 05) lspci -knn: Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7588] lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:3b42] (rev 05) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.5 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port 6 [8086:3b4c] (rev 05) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.6 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port 7 [8086:3b4e] (rev 05) lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport lspci -knn: 00:1c.7 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port 8 [8086:3b50
Bug#597799: installation-report: GPT related issues
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:13:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Back to the core of my issues. I went through a manual partitionning, and didn't create a boot partition for the grub core image, assuming I was creating an MBR partition. It turned out, in the end, that GRUB failed because of that, because the partition table was GPT. I didn't see anything about GPT being used (or maybe wasn't paying too much attention), and surely the partitioner could issue a warning that no such partition was created and that the risk is that GRUB can't be installed. Oh I forgot to add this: the installed fdisk is pointless as the only thing it can do is tell you to use parted, which supports GPT... except parted is not installed. If the install is done on GPT, shouldn't parted be installed (or any other fdisk equivalent supporting GPT) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100923101237.ga24...@glandium.org
Bug#597799: installation-report: GPT related issues
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:29:55AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:13:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Back to the core of my issues. I went through a manual partitionning, and didn't create a boot partition for the grub core image, assuming I was creating an MBR partition. It turned out, in the end, that GRUB failed because of that, because the partition table was GPT. I didn't see anything about GPT being used (or maybe wasn't paying too much attention), and surely the partitioner could issue a warning that no such partition was created and that the risk is that GRUB can't be installed. Oh I forgot to add this: the installed fdisk is pointless as the only thing it can do is tell you to use parted, which supports GPT... except parted is not installed. If the install is done on GPT, shouldn't parted be installed (or any other fdisk equivalent supporting GPT) Was this a blank unused HD or had something else already been installed before? How big is the HD? I have not seen Debian efault to GPT unless the disk was over 2TB before, or unless windows 7 had already chosen to make it GPT. The disk is a new one, though I didn't check if there was a pre-existing partitioning (but I really doubt it). OTOH, the disk is 2000GB, which is not quite over 2TB, but close enough that it may have mattered. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100923133908.ga6...@glandium.org