Bug#976308: ITA: cfengine3 -- tool for configuring and maintaining network machines
Hello Bastian, I will upload the updated package for cfengine3 in the next few days. Best regards, Fabio On 01/12/2021 16:36, Bastian Germann wrote: On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 07:45:57 +0100 Antonio Radici wrote: I had zero time to work on cfengine3 and I'm going to orphan it, I see that there was an ITA but no upload, now Bastian has taken over the ITA, is there any plan here? The ITA owner is still Fabio. I just corrected the title that was missing some words. When there is already an ITA you should not orphan the package as it is Fabio's responsibility now. Fabio, if you do not have the time to fulfill your ITA, please reset the status to orphaned instead of RFA.
Bug#976308: ITA: cfengine3 -- tool for configuring and maintaining network machines
Control: retitle 976308 ITA: cfengine3 -- tool for configuring and maintaining network machines I intend to addopt cfengine3. Best Regards, Fabio Tranchitella OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#761637: Fixed package
Hello, thanks for your work on phpldapadmin; I've built, checked and uploaded your package. Best regards, Fabio On 08/02/15 00:03, Mika Pflüger wrote: Hi, I have uploaded a package containing a fix for #761637 to mentors.debian.net: https://mentors.debian.net/package/phpldapadmin I have asked for pre-approval of the release team to include the fixed package into testing, Niels Thykier agreed that #761637 looks grave enough to justify including a fix into Jessie, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777176 As I do not have upload privileges in debian, I can't upload the fixed package myself. Could you check the fixed package and upload to unstable? I'll then file the unblock request with the release team. If you are unable to upload the package atm, I'll start searching for a sponsor from monday on. Cheers, Mika -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#669841: phamm: transition towards Apache 2.4
Hello, On 18/11/14 23:53, Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère wrote: I do propose a NMU, but I need a DD to sponsor it: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/phamm/phamm_0.6.2-1.1.dsc I can sponsor your upload, but would it be possible to upgrade the package to 0.6.3 instead of patching 0.6.2? Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696733: RM: ruid2/experimental -- ROM; broken experimental package
Package: ftp.debian.org Please remove the ruid2 package in experimental because it is broken. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#599302: plone is gone in Squeeze: need mention in release notes
* 2010-10-15 09:12, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: I've only a very vague knowledge of it and for sure I don't feel entitled to propose alternatives. I've filed the bug to be sure this issue doesn't get overlooked. I'm adding back the (ex-)maintainer in Plone developers explicitly suggests the use of the Unified Installer for Linux and they consider it their (only) supported deployment platform. For this reason, together with the complexity of the distribution of the last versions of Plone, shipped as several python eggs with strict versioned dependencies, led to the request of removal from unstable of the Plone package. As suggested by upstream, the recommended tool for installing Plone on a Debian system is the Unified Installer, which is downloadable from http://plone.org. Is this text enough? Fabio signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#585881: RM: zope-cachefu -- RoM; obsolete; not installable
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-cachefu from testing: the package is obsolete and not installable. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#585882: RM: zope-docfindertab -- RoM; obsolete; not installable
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-docfindertab from unstable: the package is obsolete and not installable. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#585883: RM: zope-linguaplone -- RoM; obsolete; not installable
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-linguaplone from unstable: the package is obsolete and not installable. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#585884: RM: zope-textindexng3 -- RoM; obsolete; not installable
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-textindexng3 from unstable: the package is obsolete and not installable. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#585885: RM: zope-zwiki -- RoM; obsolete; not installable
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-zwiki from testing: the package is obsolete and not installable. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#585886: RM: zope-externaleditor -- RoM; obsolete; not installable
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope-externaleditor from unstable: the package is obsolete and not installable. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#578981: phpldapadmin: php class 'LDAPServers' not found when opening webpage
* 2010-04-24 02:45, vitaminx wrote: Package: phpldapadmin Version: 1.2.0.5-1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze Justification: renders package unusable Hello, on opening the webpage for phpldapadmin I just get following error: Would you please try to remove your /etc/phpldapadmin/config.php and run dpkg-reconfigure phpldapadmin, or otherwise manually upgrade your config file? I'm sorry, but no automatic upgrade can be performed for the configuration file, which changed between the releases; the best I can do is to document such a change in README.Debian and/or NEWS.Debian. Best regards, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#575365: sqlobject: New version available
Hi Andreas, I've lost interest in sqlobject, as I currently use SQLAlchemy, and I've orphaned it. I think a simple rebuild is enough for the new upstream release. Best regards, Fabio * 2010-03-25 10:04, Andreas Tille wrote: Package: sqlobject Severity: minor Hi, at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/SQLObject versions 0.11.4 and 0.12.2 are listed but Debian has only 0.11. I would need version = 0.12 ro be able to update the epigrass package which I would like to do soon to meet the freeze deadline. Please tell me if you want me if you need any help to upgrade the package or if it is brain dead simple rebuild. If it needs more time I might try to help a bit. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining sqlobject Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-xenU (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Fabio Tranchitella / Tranchitella Kft. http://tranchitella.eu 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#558205: python-zopeinterface transitional package
severity 558205 wishlist tag 558205 + wontfix thanks Hi Simon, I think introducing back the python-zopeinterface package is not a good idea, so I'm tagging this bug report as wontfix but not closing it. IMHO, other packages must switch to python-zope.interface, and I consider not switching as an RC bug. It was a mistake to call the package python-zopeinterface in the past, let's try to fix it. :) Best regards. -- Fabio Tranchitella kob...@debian.org.''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562206: python-zodb: fails to upgrade from lenny to squeeze
Hi Marcos, * 2009-12-24 11:25, Marcos Marado wrote: Sure (I actually had it and completely forgot to add it to the report, sorry...): Can you please try if the problem has been solved by my last upload of python-zodb (3.9.4-1)? Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562206: python-zodb: fails to upgrade from lenny to squeeze
* 2009-12-23 21:15, Marcos Marado wrote: If you install in a lenny box python-zodb, it installs python2.4-zodb . Then, if you try to install python-zodb from squeeze, it fails to install. If you remove python2.4-zodb, then squeeze's python-zodb instalation runs as expected. Can you please paste to the bug report the output of the failing upgrade? Thanks. Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#557602: nginx: New upstream version
Hello, * 2009-11-23 08:55, Kartik Mistry wrote: You must be aware :) Please package new upstream version available (0.7.64). I will package it tonight, thanks for the remainder. If you need more 'team member', I'm ready to help too! nginx is already team maintained, feel free to join us. It is maintained on alioth. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#552918: zope.sendmail: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `debian/python-zope.sendmail/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope.se ndmail-*-py2.4.egg-info': No such file or directory
* 2009-11-20 09:21, Brian Sutherland wrote: This bug should have been fixed with the upload of van.pydeb 1.3.0-2, now in testing. The package should build-depends on van.pydeb = 1.3.0-2 to really fix the issue. I will prepare the upload tonight. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#555436: Tagging 555436
severity 555436 wishlist tag 555436 +wontfix thanks Hello, it is true that zope.testing embeds a copy of doctest.py from the standard Python library, but the module is enhanced and modified by upstream and thus it is not possible to drop the module from the package and use the standard module. Thanks, Fabio signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#553981: Questions about #553981
tag 553981 +moreinfo tag 553981 +unreproducible thanks Hello, I'm not able to reproduce the bug reported in the BTS as #553981. Can you lease provide me more information, like your dovecot.conf file? Is the problem still present in the last package I just uploaded? Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550292: closed by Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it (Closing bug)
Hello, * 2009-11-14 13:40, Martin Jürgens wrote: would it be possible to port this bug fix to stable? I will ask to the debian-release team to see if it would be okey to backport the change. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#555738: Could mod_wsgi be added to the nginx package?
tag 555738 +wontfix thanks Hello, * 2009-11-11 15:56, Hasse Hagen Johansen wrote: I would ask for the nginx to be patched and compiled with mod_wsgi from http://hg.mperillo.ath.cx/nginx/mod_wsgi/ I don't think it makes sens to compile nginx with mod_wsgi, because the WSGI module is not really compatible with the nginx architecture and I think nobody would use the module for a production environment. Also, it looks like the module is not really maintained (last commit is from 19 months ago), isn't it? Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#555049: RFA: sqlobject
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hello, as I don't use anymore sqlobject in my projects, I'm going to orphan it in the next weeks. Thanks, Fabio -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#555048: RFA: sqlobject
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm going to orphan SQLObject because I don't use it anymore in my projects; the package is already maintained within the debian-python-modules team. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#547878: sqlobject: diff for NMU version 0.11.0-1.1
Thanks zack! :) * 2009-10-11 23:14, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: tags 547878 + patch pending thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549255: RestrictedPython
severity 549254 wishlist severity 549255 wishlist thanks Hello, you are right that zope2.1[01] ship a local copy of RestrictedPython, but it is true for a lot of other libraries too (eg. zope.*, the ZTK stack). Also, upstream is moving out from RestrictedPython, so I'm marking these bugs as wishlist but not closing them, in case a different agreement is reached with other maintainers. Best regards, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#548942: zabbix: Please add SQLite support
merge 548942 468395 thanks I confirm that adding support for sqlite is a good thing (tm). I have to admit that we (as the zabbix Debian maintainers) don't have enough time to really do more than bug fixing on this package, though. I still use zabbix on my production systems, so I'm interested in keeping it in good shape, but I don't know when I'll be able to find the time to add support for sqlite-based proxy and server packages. Patches are welcome. :) Best regards, Fabio * 2009-09-29 21:04, Christoph Haas wrote: Package: zabbix Version: 1:1.6.5-1 Severity: wishlist It would be great if you could offer a zabbix-proxy-sqlite package. I'm maintaining three proxies here and need to set up and maintain a full-blown MySQL or PostgreSQL database. As the proxy is just storing data for the few seconds (normally) until the data is delivered to the Zabbix server it wouldn't need much space. It might even be logical to create a zabbix-server-sqlite package. Although I must admit that even with only few systems the database becomes pretty large quickly. And I don't believe that SQLite would be doing well with several 100 MB of data. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543945: RM: gtkdialog -- RoM; unmainatined, better alternatives libraries
Hello Sebastian, are you interested in taking over the maintenance of gtkdialog? I asked its removal, because I don't use it anymore and we have similar software in the archive, but radare depends on it. What shall we do? Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#539527: marked as done (dovecot-common: Sieve plugin does not evaluate :include scripts)
reopen 539527 thanks * 2009-08-29 22:17, Stephan Bosch wrote: * debian/patches/dovecot-managesieve-dist.dpatch: updated to the 0.11.9 release. (Closes: #539527) This does not close the bug. This is a bug in Sieve and not in ManageSieve. The patch indicated by Thomas Leuxner is in the dovecot-1.2-sieve mercurial repository. Updating dovecot-libsieve.dpatch to version 0.1.10 will fix the problem (the latest is 0.1.12). Why did you omit upgrading Sieve? By mistake, I will upload a new revision with the new sieve version later today. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543945: RM: gtkdialog -- RoM; unmainatined, better alternatives libraries
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove gtkdialog from the archive: it is not supported anymore by upstream and we have better alternatives in the archive. Thanks, Fabio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#540658: RM: zope3 -- RoM; unsopported, splitted in individual python libraries
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove zope3 from the archive: it is not supported anymore by upstream as a monolithic package, and the version in the archive is already superseded by new upstream releases of the single libraries that were part of zope3. We will upload some of the libraries that zope3 provided as individual python packages (eg. python-zope.interface, python-zope.component and so on). Thanks. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#521447: Add fair-balancer module to nginx package or as a standalone package
* 2009-08-05 20:57, José Miguel Parrella Romero wrote: I believe we should think of a way to build the modules in separate packages much a-la-libapache2_mod_* way. +1, building modules as separate packages is great. I won't have time to work on this till the end of August, though. Best regards. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#531038: package now available
Hello, * 2009-05-29 22:49, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: *However* the package depends on python-transaction, which is being packaged by the Zope team. Before that package is available, you'll need to easy_install python-transaction to be able to install repoze.tm2. transaction (which provides the python-transaction binary) has been uploaded yesterday and it is waiting in the NEW queue. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#522264: dovecot-auth startup failure with libicudata40.so
reassign 522264 libicu40 thanks Hello, * 2009-04-02 10:19, Steffen Ille wrote: I've switched back to dovecot Version 1.1.12-1 and it also NOT worked in the first try. So I changed some settings and tried around with the /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and the result was, that if I got under an special limit with two settings the error occured again and when I rised these settings to an higher value it works: According to this sentence, I think this bug is related to libicu40 and not to dovecot, this I'm reassigning the bug report to that package. Best regards. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520069: dovecot-common: same problem with dovecot-pop3d : segfault at start
Version: 1:1.1.13-1 * 2009-03-30 15:11, Patrice Bridoux wrote: Yes ! Upgraded without any trouble, restart the same. it works fine now. Closing this bug report, thanks! -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520638: dovecot-imapd: And the package is now in testing...
* 2009-03-29 12:01, Patrik Wallstrom wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1:1.1.12-1 Followup-For: Bug #520638 So why was this buggy packaged moved to testing? Because I wasn't quick enough to react and block it; do you think this deserves a new upload to experimental with urgency: high? I can do that, if needed. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520638: dovecot-imapd: TRYCREATE error after upgrading to latest dovecot
Version: 1:1.1.13-1 * 2009-03-29 19:16, Lukas Ruf wrote: Thanks for uploading. We could not reproduce the error anymore. Hence, we think it is fixed. Closing this bug report, then. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520666: dovecot-common: segfaults on start if dovecot-pop3d not
Hello, I have just uploaded a new upstream release of dovecot (1.1.13), can you please check if the problem has been solved? Thanks. * 2009-03-21 19:11, Obey Arthur Liu wrote: Subject: dovecot-common: segfaults on start if dovecot-pop3d not installed Package: dovecot-common Version: 1:1.1.12-1~unstrip Severity: important Hi, After upgrading to 1:1.1.12-1, dovecot segfaults on startup if dovecot-pop3d is not installed. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520638: dovecot-imapd: TRYCREATE error after upgrading to latest dovecot
Hello, I have just uploaded a new upstream release of dovecot (1.1.13), can you please check if the problem has been solved? Thanks. * 2009-03-21 15:15, Lukas Ruf wrote: Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1:1.1.12-1 Severity: important After upgrading the dovecot package to latest Dbeian unstable, we face TRYCREATE errors with IMAP. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521445: After the last aptitude update run, dovecot fails to open folders with mailbox doesn't exist
* 2009-03-27 16:30, Michel Meyers wrote: Package: dovecot Version: mailbox doesn't exist error on all folders after upgrade Severity: important Hello, I'm not sure if this should be filed against dovecot or dovecot-imapd. After today's package update run, which brought Dovecot to version 1:1.1.12-1, I could not access any of my custom folders in Thunderbird. The Inbox still worked, but any other folders returned mailbox doesn't exist. (This includes folders like Sent and Trash.) Can you please try with the package that I just uploaded to unstable (1.1.13-1)? Thanks. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#520069: dovecot-common: same problem with dovecot-pop3d : segfault at start
Hello, I have just uploaded a new upstream release of dovecot (1.1.13), can you please check if the problem has been solved? Thanks. * 2009-03-19 22:15, Patrice Bridoux wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 1:1.1.12-1 Followup-For: Bug #520069 Well... this is just a me too report. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518948: python-psycopg2: missing mx datetime support
Hello, * 2009-03-09 13:43, Sylvain Thénault wrote: Package: python-psycopg2 Version: 2.0.9-3 Severity: important I've update python-psycopg2 on my system and there is no more mx datetime support in the package. I've python-egenix-mxdatetime 3.1.1-1 installed The support for mx has been removed by purpose, to avoid an extra dependency; psycopg2 compiles just fine with the standard date and datetime. Can you please elaborate on the need of having psycopg2 depending on python-egenix-mxdatetime? I am thinking about shipping two different binary packages, one with support for mx datetime and one without it... Thanks. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518948: python-psycopg2: missing mx datetime support
Hello, * 2009-03-09 13:58, Sylvain Thénault wrote: I'm developping an application using mxdatetime and psycopg2 for a while now, relying on the support provided by psycopg2. Seeing this support dropped after an update is very annoying, for me at least, since I can't start my application anymore :( You are right, I'm going to make an update this evening. Can't we simply have mxdatetime as a recommands, documenting that it's necessary to activate mx datetime adapters ? Though another binary package including the mx datetime support is fine with me. I will try what you suggested, let's see if it works. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518223: skytools: Dependency on python-psycopg, superseded by psycopg2 removed from the archive (python-psycopg)
Package: skytools Severity: serious Justification: the package depends on a software which is going to be Hello, skytools depends on python-psycopg, which is not supported anymore by upstream; for this reason, we won't release Squeeze with python-psycopg, and thus all the packages depending on python-psycopg shall be patched to use python-psycopg2 instead, which is already distributed both in Lenny and testing/unstable. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-xen-amd64 Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#518225: tinyerp-server: Dependency on python-psycopg, superseded by psycopg2 removed from the archive (python-psycopg)
Package: tinyerp-server Severity: serious Justification: the package depends on a software which is going to be Hello, tinyerp-server depends on python-psycopg, which is not supported anymore by upstream; for this reason, we won't release Squeeze with python-psycopg, and thus all the packages depending on python-psycopg shall be patched to use python-psycopg2 instead, which is already distributed both in Lenny and testing/unstable. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-xen-amd64 Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to it_IT.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#507122: no new version bug
Hello, * 2009-02-23 00:52, Bastian Blank wrote: reopen 507122 thanks This bug was closed with a new version but is no new version available bug. Please fix that. Sorry, can you please help me to parse your sentence? My bad knowledge of English doesn't allow me to really understand what you pointed out. Best regards, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#517426: RM: psycopg -- RoM; obsolete, superseded by psycopg2
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove psycopg from the archive: it is not supported anymore by upstream which will only provide security-related fixes, and we already have psycopg2 in to the archive. Squeeze will only release with psycopg2, and the users are strongly suggested to upgrade their software to psycopg2. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#507913: Missing patch
It seems that you missed to attach the patch to this bug report. Best regards. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#513129: zope3: depends on python2.4
Hello, zope3 (as well as zope2.*) does not officially support python2.5, so the explicit dependency on python2.4 is needed. Things will obviously change with the new upstream releases, but for the moment there is nothing we can do about it. Best regards. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#471826: Any news?
Hello Andreas, * 2009-01-20 23:23, Andreas Putzo wrote: I prepared a pgpool2-2.1 package for experimental. Could you please have a look and possibly sponsor an upload? I uploaded to mentors: Thanks for your work! I'll review the package in the next hours. Talk to you later. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#512490: zope2.10: Problems with zope-formulator with this version of zope
reassign 512490 zope-formulator thanks Hello Filippo, I think this is a bug in zope-formulator, thus I'm reassigning it. Thanks, * 2009-01-21 09:23, Filippo Paglia wrote: I have installed the product Formulator (1.11.3) After the creation of a Formulator Form in a folder and only after the creation of a new field in this form (ex. StringField), I can't copy/move this form in any parts of zope; also I can't use the function of import of .zexp files that contain this type of object. When I try to copy the formulator form, Zope answers with this message: Error Type: AttributeError Error Value: field_added Traceback (innermost last): - Module ZPublisher.Publish,line 119,in publish - Module ZPublisher.mapply,line 88,in mapply - Module ZPublisher.Publish,line 42,in call_object - Module OFS.CopySupport,line 224,in manage_pasteObjects - Module OFS.ObjectManager,line 347,in _setObject - Module zope.event.line 23,in notify - Module zope.component.event,line 26,in dispatch - Module zope.component._api,line 130,in subscribers - Module zope.component.registry,line 290,in subscribers - Module zope.interface.adapter,line 535,in subscribers - Module zope,component.event,line 33,in objectEventNotify - Module zope.component._api,line 130,in subscribers - Module zope.component.registry,line 290,in subscribers - Module zope.interface.adapter,line 535,in subscribers - Module OFS.subscribers,line 119,in dispatchObjectMovedEvent - Module zope.app.container.contained,line 182,in dispatchToSublocations - Module zope.component._api.line 130,in subscribers - Module zope.component.registry,line 290,in subscribers - Module zope.interface.adapter,line 535,in subscribers - Module Products.Formulator.Field,line 579,in field_added Note I've modified the file zope.conf with this values: - datetime-format international - default-zpublisher-encoding utf-8 I hope to have insert the bug in the right place (I thing that this is a problem of zope and not of formulator) Thanks -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511060: dovecot-imapd: Dovecot imapd deliberately fails if the clock moves backwards on a server.
Hello, * 2009-01-08 10:28, Roger Lynn wrote: In 420175 there's a suggestion to increase Dovecot's allowed sleep time before killing itself. Is there a configuration option for this, as I can't find one in the documentation? It is defined as a constant in the source code (actually 5 seconds). -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511060: dovecot-imapd: Dovecot imapd deliberately fails if the clock moves backwards on a server.
* 2009-01-08 14:48, Roger Lynn wrote: Shouldn't the Debian package of Dovecot at least suggest both ntp and ntpdate? You are right, I've just committed this change. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#511060: dovecot-imapd: Dovecot imapd deliberately fails if the clock moves backwards on a server.
severity 420175 whishlist merge 420175 511060 thanks * 2009-01-07 06:23, Jim Studt wrote: Dovecot imapd terminates itself deliberately if the system clock moves backwards. This is the same underlying issue as bug 420175, but that was a laptop after a suspend and was deemed unimportant because of that. I prefer to merge the two bug reports, because the problem is exactly the same. This occurs on a XEN based virtual private server at a commercial hosting facility. Jan 7 04:54:49 xxx dovecot: Time just moved backwards by 81 seconds. This might cause a lot of problems, so I'll just kill myself now. http://wiki.dovecot.org/TimeMovedBackwards Are you running ntp on your server? You should, it would prevent your clock to be moved backwards by 81 seconds all together, and would probably fix this behaviour. A timebomb like this renders dovecot unsuitable for use on servers as all email clients will be unable to connect to the mail server until an administrator discovers the problem and restarts the mail server. To be honest, I run my mail servers under Xen, I run dovecot and I never had such an issue. Again, I think that having the clock going backwards by 81 seconds is a problem and should be fixed, instead of considering dovecot a time bomb. I'm pretty sure that upstream won't fix this (as stated in the wiki page), and I'm reluctant to add a wrapper script to simply restart dovecot in these situations: you would never discover the real problem. All in all, such a wrapper script is pretty easy to write if your server is affected by clock moving too fast; we can probably provide one in the package, as an example. - warn administrators that they are installing a fragile solution during install. I don't think that dovecot should be considered a fragile solution. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#509725: Update to webpy debian upload
Hello Kai, I've just uploaded your package. Happy New Year! * 2008-12-26 13:05, Kai Hendry wrote: http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/unstable/webpy_0.310-1_i386.changes -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#509725: Update to webpy debian upload
Hello Kai, I'm away from my usual development box right now, and I can't sign your package. I'll be able to sponsor the upload only after the 3rd of January, when I'm back in the office. Best wishes! * 2008-12-26 13:05, Kai Hendry wrote: http://hendry.iki.fi/debian/unstable/webpy_0.310-1_i386.changes Hi Fabio, Hope you had a good Christmas! Quick Debian package update before I embark for Berlin and the CCC. =) -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#471826: Any news?
* 2008-12-22 15:47, Andreas Putzo wrote: I was waiting for lenny to go on with pgpool2. But we could certainly upload the new upstream version to experimental anytime. If you are interested i would appreciate co-maintenance since i'm very busy from time to time :/ We are using pgpool2 in one of our projects, so we are definitely interested in having a good package for pgpool2. I will work on it in the next days and I'll send you a diff.gz before uploading to experimental. Thanks for your answer, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#471826: Any news?
Hello, I'm interested in adopting pgpool2. Any news about the ITA? Can I take it over? Andreas, would you be interested in co-maintaining the package with me? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#497454: Unable to reproduce this bug report
tag 497454 + unreproducible thanks Hello, I'm unable to reproduce this bug report on my lenny system following the instructions contained into the bug report. Can you please tell me if the problem is still there on your system? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#503385: Bug report #503385
tag 503385 + unreproducible thanks Hello, I can't reproduce this bug on my lenny system, so I'm tagging the bug report as not reproducible. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#500773: patch for trivial parts
Hello, * 2008-11-11 01:33, Jonas Meurer wrote: i can commit the patch to the zope-common svn trunk if that's ok. Yes please, commit it on svn. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#500773: dzhandle: minor issues with extensions management
Hello Jonas, * 2008-10-01 12:59, Jonas Meurer wrote: I just discovered that dzhandle supports global Extensions management, which I appreciate. But I also discovered minor bugs in dzhandles extensions management: Uh? Extensions? To be honest, I never used a Zope extension in my life, and the support of zope extensions in dzhandle was a copy-n-paste from the products part. Can you please point me to a few Zope extensions I can use for testing dzhandle? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#498679: dovecot FTBFS: unreproducible
reopen 498679 thanks I can confirm that dovect FTBFS in unstable, but not in testing; it seems a problem related to the sieve module, I'm checking the differences between unstable and testing. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479185: remove nginx from lenny?
Hello, * 2008-09-19 02:00, Adeodato Simó wrote: Then, why not upload the workaround (use gcc-4.2) right away, and let that migrate to testing? I'm uploading now a fixed version. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#499277: python-dns security update breaks existing applications
Package: python-dns Version: 2.3.0-5.2+etch1 Severity: grave Justification: breaks existing applications Hello, after upgrading our production servers running Zope 3, we started hitting the following exception: 2008-09-17T06:06:57 ERROR SiteError http://www.loveismatch.com/signup.html Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/publisher/publish.py, line 133, in publish result = publication.callObject(request, obj) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/app/publication/zopepublication.py, line 161, in callObject return mapply(ob, request.getPositionalArguments(), request) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/publisher/publish.py, line 108, in mapply return debug_call(obj, args) - __traceback_info__: bound method UserRegistration.__call__ of zope.app.publisher.browser.viewmeta.UserRegistration object at 0x2bf9c610 File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/publisher/publish.py, line 114, in debug_call return obj(*args) File /var/lib/zope3/instance/loveismatch_3/lib/python/loveismatch/browser/users.py, line 114, in __call__ validators.Email(resolve_domain=True).to_python(values['email']) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/formencode/api.py, line 322, in to_python vp(value, state) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/formencode/validators.py, line 1227, in validate_python domains = mxlookup(splitted[1]) File /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/DNS/lazy.py, line 26, in mxlookup a = Base.DnsRequest(name, qtype = 'mx').req().answers File /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/DNS/Base.py, line 191, in req m.addQuestion(qname, qtype, Class.IN) File /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/DNS/Lib.py, line 466, in addQuestion self.addname(qname) File /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/DNS/Lib.py, line 133, in addname self.buf = self.buf + buf UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe9 in position 0: ordinal not in range(128) As you can see, I'm using formencode to validate an e-mail address with the following instruction: validators.Email(resolve_domain=True).to_python(values['email']) It worked for years, and just stopped working after the upgrade. Reverting to the old package (version 2.3.0-5.1) fixed the problem. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#499277: python-dns security update breaks existing applications
Hello Scott, * 2008-09-17 17:18, Scott Kitterman wrote: Also in Sid/Lenny. It looks like there were buffer packing implications in the security fix that neither upstream nor myself appreciated when we wrote it. The security fix had two parts: source port randomization and transaction ID randomization. If instead of reverted to the package that has neither, you change 'self.tid' to '0' in line 199 of /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/DNS/Base.py you will work around this problem and still have source port randomization. I've contacted upstream and will get this sorted out. Thanks for your answer, I'm cc'ing the security team to bring to their attention the bug report: we'll have to issue a new security update with the fix. Best regards, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#495778: dovecot-pop3d: auth_debug_passwords = yes logs passwords even when they are correct.
* 2008-08-28 13:10, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 13:26 +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote: Package: dovecot-pop3d Version: 1.0.rc15-2etch4 Severity: minor auth_debug_password is described as such: # In case of password mismatches, log the passwords and used scheme so the # problem can be debugged. Requires auth_debug=yes to be set. This means that only bad/erroneous authentications should be logged, however when auth_debug_password is set to 'yes', all conversations are logged Fixed at least in upstream v1.1 now: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/0716945b2680 Thanks Timo for the patch; I won't upload a new release with this change because we are in freeze and IMHO this change doesn't qualify for a freeze exception. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#471822: closed by Alessandro De Zorzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#471822: fixed in php-fpdf 1:1.6.dfsg-1)
Hey folks, * 2008-08-19 09:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the wnpp package: #471822: RFA: php-fpdf -- PHP class to generate PDF files It has been closed by Alessandro De Zorzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Alessandro De Zorzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] by replying to this email. Dude, do you understand what RFA means? It does not mean, hijack this package when you feel like it. Please undo this damage forthwith. Could you please try to lower the tone of the conversation? I sponsored the package of Alessandro, who told me that he wrote you an e-mail before the upload (which I think you didn't read, according to your message). Do you want me to upload the old version of the package with a new epoch, put you back as a maintainer, retitle the bug from RFA to ITA, do again the upload with a new epoch? Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#471822: closed by Alessandro De Zorzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#471822: fixed in php-fpdf 1:1.6.dfsg-1)
reopen 471822 thanks * 2008-08-19 11:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Do you want me to upload the old version of the package with a new epoch, put you back as a maintainer, retitle the bug from RFA to ITA, do again the upload with a new epoch? I ask that you upload the old version of the package with a new epoch, put me back as the maintainer, reopen the RFA bug, and refrain from interfering with the package until after the lenny release and further consultation with me. Here you are, I just uploaded again the old unstable version. Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?
Hello all, I need some help regarding #493781: the submitter reported the bug as grave because he thinks that modifying slapd.conf to include an extra LDAP schema from the maintainer scripts of a package (phamm-ldap in this case) is against the Debian policy. Considering that slapd.conf is not (anymore) a conffile, in my opinion this behaviour is not forbidden from the Debian policy and thus the bug report could be closed without any change to the phamm-ldap package. Of course, having an official way from the slapd package to add new schemas would be wonderful, but until this feature is added I think that this is the only possibility to automatically include a new schema in slapd.conf. Opinions? Thanks in advance, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?
* 2008-08-10 21:09, Carsten Hey wrote: | 11.7.4 Sharing configuration files | | ... | | The maintainer scripts must not alter a conffile of any package, | including the one the scripts belong to. It is not a conffile, so this is not a problem. This is the exact sentence which keeps me thinking that this is not an RC bug, or maybe not a bug at all until slapd does provide a script for handling updates. The whole procedure *should* be done, so this is not a must. Is there a valid reason in this particular circumstance to ignore the recommendation of the policy? The package slapd doesn't provide any updater script, but without adding the schema in slapd.conf phamm can't work so the package is unusable. What the maintainer would like to have (I'm only sponsoring the package) is that the user could use phamm directly after an aptitude install phamm without having to read documentation or changing configuration files. Do you unterstand the full implications and did you carefully weighed your decision to alter the other packages configuration file (see quoted part of the RFC)? Is the other packages maintainer aware of the changes you do in his or her configuration file? I think the slapd's maintainer should provide a way to add additional schemas, and this is an old problem which has been discussed in the past. Best regards, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?
* 2008-08-10 22:25, Peter Palfrader wrote: The submitter is right. | Packages must not modify other packages' configuration files | except by an agreed upon APIs (eg, a /usr/sbin/update-foo | command). http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt section 3. Thanks, we'll prepare a new release which disables the slapd.conf mangling and provides documentation within README.Debian. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#493803: fragile build system
Hello, * 2008-08-06 12:28, Matthias Klose wrote: - apparently libtoolize (2.2) removes the config.sub/config.guess files, so the copy stuff may be moved around for this libtoolize version. see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtool/+bug/254183 Thanks, I'll add the --install switch. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#493781: phamm and slapd.conf
Hello, regarding bug #493781, /etc/ldap/slapd.conf is not a conffile (it is created by the postinst maintainer script of the slapd package), thus the policy doesn't prevent other packages to modify it directly. Am I wrong? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#489887: closed by Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#489887: fixed in phpldapadmin 1.1.0.5-5)
Hello, * 2008-08-05 18:22, Olivier Berger wrote: I'm not really sure, but I guess it won't make it to lenny considering the freeze, as it was fixed in unstable too late, and its severity is too low. This bug will be fixed in lenny too, I'll ask for a freeze exception. Best regards, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#492849: zope-plone3: Plone instance not starting
Hello, * 2008-07-29 13:37, Andrea Brenci wrote: Package: zope-plone3 Version: 3.1.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After updating my sid installation on 29 july 2008, runzope gives the following error message: I think the problem is in zope-common and not in zope-plone3; I just uploaded a new release of zope-common into unstable. Could you please try to install that new version and run an upgrade again? Thanks in advance, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#492849: zope-plone3: Plone instance not starting
reassign 492849 zope-common thanks * 2008-08-03 15:32, Andrea Brenci wrote: yes, the problem is fixed now. Thank you. Let's reassign the bug to zope-common, then. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#489887: error on adding new attribute
Hello Jamie, * 2008-07-20 23:10, Jamie Thompson wrote: dn: dc=. Isn't it strange that your entry has a dn like dc=.? I'd expect something like dc=domain or better dc=domain,dc=org. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#489887: error on adding new attribute
Hello, * 2008-07-21 10:00, Jamie Thompson wrote: Isn't it strange that your entry has a dn like dc=.? I'd expect something like dc=domain or better dc=domain,dc=org. Well...yes, it is a bit strange, but there is method to this madness. Basically, my DNS is pulled out of my LDAP tree, and thus requires a top level element for each TLD. I could have achieved this by using multiple trees, but I elected to go with a single-tree solution. This requires a root entry, so I went with the same as the implicit root used in DNS, namely '.' as in 'debian.org.' I think this is the problem: phpldapadmin doesn't like too much strange values for the attributes used in the dn (eg. we had problems with commas in the past). I'll check if I can provide a patch to solve the issue. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#489887: phpldapadmin: error on adding new attribute
Hello Thomas, * 2008-07-08 16:31, Thomas Mueller wrote: Error E_WARNING: array_search() [function.array-search]: Wrong datatype for second argument You found a non-fatal phpLDAPadmin bug! Error:Array to string conversion (E_NOTICE) File: add_attr_form.php line 27, caller cmd.php Versions: PLA: 1.1.0.5, PHP: 5.2.5-3+lenny2, SAPI: apache2handler Web server: Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) PHP/5.2.5-3+lenny2 with Suhosin-Patch mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0 Are you using special schemas? can you please export that object in LDIF format and attach it to the bug report? Do you have the same error with other objects in the directory? Which attribute are you adding? there is also a lenghty PHP DEBUG Backtrace below the error messages which I a can provide on demand. Yes, please attach it to the bug report. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376146: a shame
Hi Jon, * 2008-06-30 15:43, Jon Dowland wrote: That's a shame. I (a user) would much prefer the ubuntu approach, which might not be as good as the ideal situation you describe, but is actually feasible in the next release, whilst there's no evidence anyone will ever put together the ideal solution. Would you reconsider for Lenny? I don't think we'll switch to the snakeoil certificate for dovecot anytime soon: the idea of installing a network daemon with a predictable SSL certificate is not only suboptimal, but it should be avoided, IMHO. Writing a generic tool to handle certificates on debian machines is my TODO list, but it will miss Lenny, of course. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#487989: Pls package new release dovecot v1.1.1
Hello, * 2008-06-25 17:22, Friedemann Schorer wrote: Well, subject tels it - v1.1.1 is out, and as there are many improvements I (and probably many others) would like to have a DEB of that version. Thanks for your work on this program - I appreciate a lot! Work is in progress, a 1.1.1 package will be uploaded to experimental very soon; we are still not sure about uploading it to unstable and try to get it into lenny, though. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479185: Help for a FTBFS on sparc
reassign 479185 gcc-4.3 thanks * 2008-06-04 21:47, Josip Rodin wrote: On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: I have a FTBFS bug for nginx (see bug #479185), but I don't have the knowledge nor the resources to debug the issue. Any idea about what is the problem there? Looks to me like you want to reassign this to gcc, unless your build system somehow fiddles with gcc internals. As suggested (see the quoted answer from debian-sparc), I'm reassigning bug #479185 to gcc-4.3. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#484677: Acknowledgement (imap_quota plugin doesn't load)
* 2008-06-05 16:24, Timo Sirainen wrote: lib11_imap_quota_plugin_la_LDFLAGS = -module -avoid-version +lib11_imap_quota_plugin_la_LIBADD = ../quota/lib10_quota_plugin.la Well, I suppose this could make it a bit easier.. But you could also have just done it as it was intended: mail_plugins = quota imap_quota Do you suggest to apply the patch to Debian, or do you plan to apply it in a new upstream release? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#484677: Acknowledgement (imap_quota plugin doesn't load)
Hello Timo, * 2008-06-05 16:40, Timo Sirainen wrote: I'm not sure that it doesn't breaks something, so I'm not applying it at least to v1.0/v1.1. Also documentation everywhere (AFAIK) says that quota and imap_quota plugins be loaded together, so I don't think it's that big of a deal. Thanks for your explanation, I'll add a note about it in the README.Debian file, just to be sure that users have some clue about these dependencies. Thanks for your support, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#473571: plone3 CVEs
* 2008-06-02 15:06, Steffen Joeris wrote: Any progress on this bug so far? I would like to say yes, but the truth is that upstream released a new upstream addressing only some of the CVEs; I didn't have time to track down exactly the changes (it was a new upstream version, with a lot of unrelated changes). I know this should be solved somehow, but I simply didn't have time to check all the changes between the two upstream releases. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#483553: dovecot-common: Initscript can't handle Dovecot as a pure SASL daemon
Version: 1:1.0.3-1 * 2008-05-29 13:19, Marco Marzetti wrote: While /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf suggests to set protocols=none if you only want to use dovecot-auth, dovecot's initscript ( /etc/init.d/dovecot ) looks for protocols=imaps|pop3s before starting the deamon. This bug has been fixed in the testing/unstable packages; sadly, it can't be fixed in etch (stable) because it is not a critical bug. Thanks for reporting the bug. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#471716: Debian Bug #471716: dovecot-common: Permission Denied Errors after converting to 'mail_privileged_group'
* 2008-05-27 13:53, Timo Sirainen wrote: I fixed this in v1.1 a few days ago. Here's also for v1.0: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/932768a879c6 Thanks Timo, I'm uploading a new release of the Debian package with this patch included. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#481469: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#481469: dovecot-common: mail_extra_groups deprecation not fixed very helpfully for me and probably most users]
Hello Thijs, * 2008-05-19 09:52, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: There /is/ a clear warning not to do that, and it is in the advisory text. This is the place were updates to stable security and their consequences are announced. ... I'm marking the bug as minor. You can ask the stable release team if they're willing to accept an update for this, but it's out of the scope of the security team. Thanks for your detailed explanation, I'll ask the stable release team for the inclusion of a fixed version with a better warning message. Have a nice day, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#481469: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#481469: dovecot-common: mail_extra_groups deprecation not fixed very helpfully for me and probably most users]
* 2008-05-19 15:58, Chris Evans wrote: a) the meaning of deprecated, I think it was incorrectly used here and should have said has been disabled and the program will not run with this option still in the conf file In fact, dovecot should at least start with the old setting: this is what the new upstream release did. I'll have a look at it, it is possible that I did something wrong while backporting the patch. b) documenting such changes in the package docs, This is a good idea, and I missed it indeed. c) to restart such processes if they have had a change made that could crash an old conf file: at least that way such things will show up immediately helping us understand what's happened. Isn't dovecot restarted after the security release is installed into the system? I'll try to manually install it... Best regards, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#481469: dovecot-common: mail_extra_groups deprecation not fixed very helpfully for me and probably most users
Hello Chris, * 2008-05-16 13:23, Chris Evans wrote: I see that the upgrade which deprecates mail_extra_groups is regarded as having been fixed. However, I don't think the fix is optimal for most of us. Thanks for your bug report; I forwarded your message to the Debian Security Team to have an opinion about the issue. Best regards, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#473571: closed by Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#473571: fixed in plone3 3.1.1-1)
* 2008-05-06 10:21, Nico Golde wrote: * New upstream release. * Add CSRF protection to user forms and control panel pages (CVE-2008-0164). (Closes: #473571) * debian/control: depends on libjs-prototype. (Closes: #475286) What about the other CVE ids? AFAIK, upstream simply ignored them. :-/ -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#473571: closed by Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#473571: fixed in plone3 3.1.1-1)
reopen 473571 thanks * 2008-05-06 10:41, Nico Golde wrote: Then I see no reason to close the bug. Please clone one for the CSRF issue, close that one and leave the other open. Yep, you are right and I'm wrong; I'm reopening this bug report, I'll check deeply the changes between the two releases to track down all the issues. -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479059: dovecot-common: dovecot manpage fails to document the signals you can send the daemon
Hello Stuart, * 2008-05-02 15:41, Stuart Rowan wrote: Please add a SIGNALS section the the dovecot manpage I was trying to create a logrotate.d/dovecot file for my system (perhaps this should be done by the package anyway?) and wanted to find out how to get the daemon to reopen its logfiles. (I was previously just restarting dovecot) I'll add a SIGNALS section with the next upload, thanks for your suggestion; the package doesn't ship a logrotate script because in the default configuration dovecot doesn't use dedicated log files. Have a nice week-end, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479059: dovecot-common: dovecot manpage fails to document the signals you can send the daemon
Hello Stuart, * 2008-05-02 19:32, Stuart Rowan wrote: I don't know whether the below would be useful in README.Debian or elsewhere but, as I've just done it, I thought I'd write it up and leave that choice to you :-) Great, thanks! I'll add it to README.Debian, it is a very useful information for our users. -- Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED].''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user.: :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#476952: Info received (Bug#476952: include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf entry for nginx.conf)
tag 476952 - wontfix thanks Hello, * 2008-04-22 23:54, David Dick wrote: i've sent a patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to allow include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf; even when the glob returns no matches. Great, thanks for letting us know; we discussed this bug report with Jose and we are going to upload a new release with this feature. Best regards, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#476952: include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf entry for nginx.conf
tag 476952 +wontfix thanks Hello David, * 2008-04-20 13:14, David Dick wrote: Package:nginx Version:0.4.13-2 in order to package web applications for nginx, the packager needs a way to add entries to the nginx.conf file. A method for doing that is including a include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf line in nginx.conf. While I fully agree with you, nginx doesn't support very well the situation where you don't have files inside the conf.d directory: Starting nginx: 2008/04/21 11:13:58 [emerg] 11300#0: glob() /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf failed (2: No such file or directory) in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf:26 nginx. For this reason, I'm marking this bug report as wontfix until upstream will include a feature that allows us to use the include statement in all cases or we find another way to support the conf.d directory. Cheers, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#476783: dovecot-common: dovecot will not run with the 'new' mail_privileged_group option
Hello, * 2008-04-19 07:45, Brent G. wrote: Package: dovecot-common Version: 1:1.0.13-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable == Restarting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecotError: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf line 264: Unknown setting: mail_privileged_group == I just reinstalled 1:1.0.13-2 from testing and it worked without problems; can you please send as an attachment your dovecot.conf? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#474519: nginx: support Debian's /doc/ URL-to-directory mapping
Hello, * 2008-04-07 17:43, Jose Miguel Parrella Romero wrote: | CGI, however, seems a little complicate and I don't feel it's safe ATM to | implement it in nginx. Fabio: I've prepared revision -3 of the package | with these two changes, but I'd like to have your opinion on this topic | and also about supporting CGI. I fully agree: CGi is not something I'd enable by default; Jose, I checked your commit in subversion and in my opinion everything is fine. Can you please upload the package? Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
