Bug#523093: [Bug 364931] Re: [needs-packaging] gnote in karmic
Savvas, please would you compare yours with it, and if you have any suggestions/improvements on the packaging let me know about it so they can be merged? Thanks Hello! Here is a summary of changes: - 0.3.0 is out :) - You should have a debian/watch file - I didn't make one since I'm based on git. Here's a suggestion: version=3 http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnote/(?:[\d\w\.]+)/gnote-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 (It works, but I don't know if it's correct, I'm not that good with custom debian/watch files, e.g. ./0.3/gnote-0.3.0) - I have split the package into 3 different ones: gnote (binary), gnote-data (data without compilation), gnote-addins (binary) - I am using boost 1.37 or boost 1.35 or boost - I don't know if that's good, but at least it gives more testing control over various boost libraries: libboost1.37-dev | libboost1.35-dev | libboost-dev, libboost-filesystem1.37-dev | libboost-filesystem1.35-dev | libboost-filesystem-dev, libboost-regex1.37-dev | libboost-regex1.35-dev | libboost-regex-dev, libboost-iostreams1.37-dev | libboost-iostreams1.35-dev | libboost-iostreams-dev, libboost-test1.37-dev | libboost-test1.35-dev | libboost-test-dev, - I've also set versioned dependencies, based on autoconf and ./configure: automake (= 1.9), autoconf (= 2.53), pkg-config (= 0.14.0), libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.14), [...] intltool (= 0.35), gnome-doc-utils (= 0.4.2), - For some reason, during document compilation/creation, it requires rarian-compat package. I don't know if that's required for Debian, but on ubuntu it was spitting errors (maybe the situation changed with newer releases). - I'm using debhelper 7 debian/rules without cdbs: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~medigeek/%2Bjunk/gnote-packaging/annotate/head%3A/debian/rules http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~medigeek/%2Bjunk/gnote-packaging/files/head%3A/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#523093: [Bug 364931] Re: [needs-packaging] gnote in karmic
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 08:08:39AM +0200, Savvas Radevic wrote: - 0.3.0 is out :) I just updated the package in http://people.debian.org/~rmh/gnote/ - You should have a debian/watch file - I didn't make one since I'm based on git. Here's a suggestion: Added, thanks. - I have split the package into 3 different ones: gnote (binary), gnote-data (data without compilation), gnote-addins (binary) This might make sense, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to decide about package split just yet. - I am using boost 1.37 or boost 1.35 or boost - I don't know if that's good, but at least it gives more testing control over various boost libraries: libboost1.37-dev | libboost1.35-dev | libboost-dev, libboost-filesystem1.37-dev | libboost-filesystem1.35-dev | libboost-filesystem-dev, libboost-regex1.37-dev | libboost-regex1.35-dev | libboost-regex-dev, libboost-iostreams1.37-dev | libboost-iostreams1.35-dev | libboost-iostreams-dev, libboost-test1.37-dev | libboost-test1.35-dev | libboost-test-dev, I'll talk to upstream to see which version of boost is preferred. - I've also set versioned dependencies, based on autoconf and ./configure: automake (= 1.9), autoconf (= 2.53), pkg-config (= 0.14.0), libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.14), [...] intltool (= 0.35), gnome-doc-utils (= 0.4.2), Added, thanks. Except for automake (not needed) and gtk (= 2.12 is enough now). - For some reason, during document compilation/creation, it requires rarian-compat package. I don't know if that's required for Debian, but on ubuntu it was spitting errors (maybe the situation changed with newer releases). No idea. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
