Bug#304092: marked as done (ultrapossum-slapd: FTBFS: failed test)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 15:36:41 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304092: ultrapossum-slapd: FTBFS: failed test has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2005 20:22:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 10 13:22:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DKiwf-0002Nm-00; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:22:13 -0700 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA08E7B1E; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:22:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-70-5.mnet-online.de [82.135.70.5]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878F2695C5; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:22:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4A2100442A3; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:22:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ultrapossum-slapd: FTBFS: failed test Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:22:06 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ultrapossum-slapd Version: 0.0.4+2.2.20sb2-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package ultrapossum-slapd in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] Using ldapsearch to check that master slapd is running... Waiting 5 seconds for slapd to start... Starting slave slapd on TCP/IP port 9012... Using ldapsearch to check that slave slapd is running... Waiting 20 seconds for syncbackup to receive changes... modify data Waiting 10 seconds for syncbackup to receive changes... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the master... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the slave... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the another slave... Filtering ldapsearch results... Filtering original ldif used to create database... Comparing retrieved entries from master and slave... Filtering original ldif used to create database... Comparing retrieved entries from master and slave... test failed - master and another slave databases differ ./scripts/test101-syncbackup [1mfailed[m (exit 1) make[6]: *** [bdb-yes] Error 1 make[6]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ultrapossum-slapd-0.0.4+2.2.20sb2/upstream/build-tree/openldap-2.2.20/tests' make[5]: *** [test] Error 2 make[5]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ultrapossum-slapd-0.0.4+2.2.20sb2/upstream/build-tree/openldap-2.2.20/tests' make[4]: *** [test] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ultrapossum-slapd-0.0.4+2.2.20sb2/upstream/build-tree/openldap-2.2.20' make[3]: *** [check-local] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ultrapossum-slapd-0.0.4+2.2.20sb2/upstream' make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ultrapossum-slapd-0.0.4+2.2.20sb2/upstream' make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/ultrapossum-slapd-0.0.4+2.2.20sb2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 = Please note that on other arches, the packages FTBFS, too, but for different reasons (linker error, other tests). Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. --- Received: (at 304092-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 06:37:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 23:37:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sv1.valinux.co.jp [210.128.90.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTwSa-0005fT-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 23:37:16 -0700 Received: from taru.local.valinux.co.jp (vagw.valinux.co.jp [210.128.90.14]) by sv1.valinux.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C85970BED; Fri, 6 May 2005 15:37:15 +0900 (JST) Subject: Re: Bug#304092: ultrapossum-slapd:
Processed: Re: Bug#307883: gnumeric-doc: docs package doesn't contain any docs!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307883 + sid Bug#307883: gnumeric-doc: docs package doesn't contain any docs! There were no tags set. Tags added: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307796: Proposed patch
Proposed stupid-patch for the testing distribution.
If there isn't apex in the supplied argumenti it's impossible to modify
the SQL query.
Bye,
Gerardo
diff -Nru /tmp/4fCGVl7C4o/xtradius-1.2.1-beta2/contrib/authmysql/authmysql.c
/tmp/pjjbxPhZcv/xtradius-1.2.1-beta2/contrib/authmysql/authmysql.c
--- /tmp/4fCGVl7C4o/xtradius-1.2.1-beta2/contrib/authmysql/authmysql.c
2002-03-02 15:45:02.0 +
+++ /tmp/pjjbxPhZcv/xtradius-1.2.1-beta2/contrib/authmysql/authmysql.c
2005-05-06 07:27:23.639379832 +
@@ -61,9 +61,12 @@
*/
+if (strstr(argv[1], ') == NULL){
command_length = strlen(SQL_SELECT) + strlen(argv[1]) + strlen(argv[2]);
command = (char *) malloc(command_length*sizeof(char));
sprintf(command,SQL_SELECT,argv[1]);
+}
+else exit(-1);
/*
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:41:13PM +0200, Primoz Bratanic wrote: Package: pam-pgsql Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole The problem reported in BUG#230875 and marked as fixed (NMU upload) was open again. The changes have disappeared. Please see the patch attached to Bug#230875 regarding sql injection problem with changing password (easy impact would be changing uid to 0 ... root compromise). It looks like the upload that reverted these changes was a botched attempt at orphaning the package. Bug #303198, however, is currently titled RFA, not O. Joerg, was your intention here to continue maintaining pam-pgsql until someone else comes along to do so, or were you trying to orphan the package immediately so that you're no longer responsible for it? If it is indeed the maintainer's intention to orphan this package, I would recommend removing it from sarge on account of the progressive security issues. I would be willing to fix and maintain the package if there is someone who would be willing to sponsor the upload. Primoz Bratanic signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 307883
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307883 sid Bug#307883: gnumeric-doc: docs package doesn't contain any docs! Tags were: sid Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Proof of consept: http://www.frsirt.com/exploits/20050322.k-rad.c.php This would work on other NON-SMP kernels too. Makes kernel images unusable for multiuser system. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc3-mm3-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#195293: Removal from archive ?
Hi Yven, wonder why this package is not yet removed as you said on October 2003. Its also superceeded IMHO by java-package which provides a method to install also IBM jdk/jre binary packages. Regards, Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopening 307275, tagging 307275
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reopen 307275 Bug#307275: phpmyadmin: upgrade breaks included conffiles from other packages Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 307275 sarge Bug#307275: phpmyadmin: upgrade breaks included conffiles from other packages There were no tags set. Bug#304786: apache2-common: Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/*.conf Tags added: sarge End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302995: marked as done (fastjar: postinst does not check for errors)
Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.4-3.4.3-12.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 22:52:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 15:52:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIDxZ-0002rJ-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:52:49 -0700 Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIDxY-0006ZV-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:52:49 -0600 Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j33MqXXE025457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:52:33 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j33MqWcM025455; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:52:32 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gettext: ftbfs [sparc] `debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar': No such file or directory X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:52:32 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gettext Version: 0.14.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source gettext failed to build from source on the sparc buildd, however it built fine on my sparc pbuilder. The buildd log lacks some things that are in the pbuilder log config.status: creating intl-java/Makefile config.status: creating intl-csharp/Makefile and of course the sections that use those makefiles. buildd error: find debian/gettext-base/usr/share/locale | grep gettext-tools | xargs rm install -d debian/gettext-base/usr/share/gettext cp -p debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar \ debian/gettext-base/usr/share/gettext cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/gettext/libintl.jar': No such file or directory make[1]: *** [gettext-base] Error 1 --- Received: (at 302995-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 09:14:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 02:14:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTyud-0003BB-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 02:14:23 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA25925 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 6 May 2005 11:14:21 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47B6F2CB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 6 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 14612-15 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 6 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200 (MEST) 14027 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 6 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j469EKKw009453; Fri, 6 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 11:14:20 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in gcc-3.4-3.4.3-12.1 X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) Jumbo Shrimp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: fixed in
Bug#307241: marked as done (gcc-3.4: FTBFS: doxygen segfault processing libstdc++v3 headers)
Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2005 11:12:58 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in gcc-3.4 3.4.3-12.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 01:16:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 18:16:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DSPY1-0003IS-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 18:16:33 -0700 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07313172843; Sun, 1 May 2005 18:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1998852044== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-3.4: FTBFS: doxygen segfault processing libstdc++v3 headers X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 18:16:32 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1998852044== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: gcc-3.4 Version: 3.4.3-12 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi Matthias, This bug is the mirror of bug #304659, doxygen segfaulting during the build of gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12. There appears to be an invalid use of '@var' without a corresponding variable declaration in libstdc++v3/include/bits/basic_string.h. Fixing this reference allows gcc-3.4 to build from source again with current doxygen. Patch attached. This patch will be included in my upcoming NMU for bug #302995. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --===1998852044== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=gcc-3.4-doxygen.patch diff -uNr gcc-3.4-3.4.3.orig/debian/README.Debian gcc-3.4-3.4.3/debian/README.Debian --- gcc-3.4-3.4.3.orig/debian/README.Debian 2005-05-01 18:03:06.0 -0700 +++ gcc-3.4-3.4.3/debian/README.Debian 2005-05-01 18:02:19.0 -0700 @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Patches that Debian applied in this version: cvs-updates: - CVS updates from the 3.4 branch upto 20050305 + CVS updates from the 3.4 branch upto 20050314 gcc-version: Add (Debian package version) to the gcc version string @@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ libstdc++-doclink: adjust hrefs to point to the local documentation +libstdc++-doxygen-syntax: + fix doxygen syntax error in header that causes segfaults with some + versions + amd64-specs: On x86-64 use 64bits mode assembly except with -m32. @@ -123,9 +127,6 @@ library (i.e. gij looks for .so.5 for loading additional libraries like the GTK based AWT peers. -pr19311: - Proposed patch to fix PR19311 - m68k-update: Add two m68k specfic patches backported from 4.0 concerning wrong code generation (Richard Zidlicky). diff -uNr gcc-3.4-3.4.3.orig/debian/patches/libstdc++-doxygen-syntax.dpatch gcc-3.4-3.4.3/debian/patches/libstdc++-doxygen-syntax.dpatch --- gcc-3.4-3.4.3.orig/debian/patches/libstdc++-doxygen-syntax.dpatch 1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800 +++ gcc-3.4-3.4.3/debian/patches/libstdc++-doxygen-syntax.dpatch 2005-05-01 17:56:05.0 -0700 @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +#! /bin/sh -e + +# DP: fix doxygen syntax error in header that causes segfaults with some +# DP: versions + +dir= +if [ $# -eq 3 -a $2 = '-d' ]; then +pdir=-d $3 +dir=$3/ +elif [ $# -ne 1 ]; then +echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument +exit 1 +fi +case $1 in +-patch) +patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 $0 +;; +-unpatch) +patch $pdir -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p1 $0 +;; +*) +echo 2 `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument +exit 1 +esac +exit 0 + [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ +diff -uNr src.orig/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h src/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h +--- src.orig/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h 2004-10-28 14:52:40.0 -0700
Processed: Fixed in upload of synaptic 0.55+cvs20050503-1.1 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 302643 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#302643: synaptic: FTBFS in experimental Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 306383 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#306383: synaptic/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: undeclared variable Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307290: marked as done (addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol')
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 14:14:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2005 10:28:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 02 03:28:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c169155.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.169.155] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DSY9u-0002rm-00; Mon, 02 May 2005 03:28:14 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DSYAD-0005Ni-9X; Mon, 02 May 2005 12:28:35 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 12:28:35 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: addresses-for-gnustep Version: 0.4.6-3 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'addresses-for-gnustep' on i386/testing, I get the following error: gcc VCFViewer.m -c \ -MMD -MP -DGNUSTEP -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_GUI_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_RUNTIME=1 -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DGSWARN -DGSDIAGNOSE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fgnu-runtime -Wall -fconstant-string-class=NSConstantString -I/addresses-for-gnustep-0.4.6/Frameworks -I. -I/root/GNUstep/Library/Headers -I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers -I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Network/Library/Headers -I/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers \ -o shared_obj/VCFViewer.o In file included from VCFViewer.m:16: VCFViewer.h:17:47: warning: GWorkspace/ContentViewersProtocol.h: No such file or directory In file included from VCFViewer.m:16: VCFViewer.h:25: error: cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol' make[3]: *** [shared_obj/VCFViewer.o] Error 1 With the attached patch, 'addresses-for-gnustep' can be compiled on i386/testing. There is a new version of addresses-for-gnustep in sid which already has this patch applied, but which will probably not enter sarge because of #304968. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../../addresses-for-gnustep-0.4.6/Goodies/GNUmakefile ./Goodies/GNUmakefile --- ../../addresses-for-gnustep-0.4.6/Goodies/GNUmakefile 2005-04-29 22:06:30.117828958 +0200 +++ ./Goodies/GNUmakefile 2005-04-29 22:07:22.816817494 +0200 @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/common.make SUBPROJECTS = \ - VCFViewer \ adgnumailconverter \ adserver \ adtool --- Received: (at 307290-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 12:14:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 05:14:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU1ik-00013D-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 05:14:19 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (lan31-6-82-230-27-192.fbx.proxad.net [82.230.27.192]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4AC1734D3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 6 May 2005 14:14:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 14:14:16 +0200 From: Eric Heintzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#307290: addresses-for-gnustep: FTBFS (testing): cannot find protocol declaration for `ContentViewersProtocol' References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Steve
Bug#307912: evolution: relocation error: /usr/lib/libnspr4.so
Package: evolution Version: 2.2.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Evolution won't start. This error is displayed: evolution-shell-Message: Killing old version of evolution-data-server... evolution: relocation error: /usr/lib/libnspr4.so: symbol phread_mtexattrBsettypepthreadcondattE_init, version GLIBC_2.1 not defined in file libpthread.so.0 with link time reference -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages evolution depends on: ii evolution-data-serve 1.2.2-3 evolution database backend server ii gconf2 2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste ii gnome-icon-theme 2.8.0-4 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii gtkhtml3.6 3.6.2-1 HTML rendering/editing library - b ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcamel1.2-01.2.2-3 The Evolution MIME message handlin ii libcompfaceg11989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai ii libebook1.2-31.2.2-3 Client library for evolution addre ii libecal1.2-2 1.2.2-3 Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1.2-4 1.2.2-3 Utily library for evolution data s ii libedataserverui1.2- 1.2.2-3 GUI utily library for evolution da ii libesd0 0.2.35-2.1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgail-common 1.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgail171.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgal2.4-0 2.4.2-1 G App Libs (run time library) ii libgal2.4-common 2.4.2-1 G App Libs (common files) ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring00.4.2-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome-pilot2 2.0.12-1.2 Support libraries for gnome-pilot ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.8.2-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.4-3 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error01.0-1 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkhtml3.6-18 3.6.2-1 HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libldap2 2.1.30-6OpenLDAP libraries ii libnspr4 2:1.7.7-2 Netscape Portable Runtime Library ii libnss3 2:1.7.7-2 Network Security Service Libraries ii liborbit21:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpisock8 0.11.8-10 Library for communicating with a P ii libpisync0 0.11.8-10 Synchronization library for PalmOS ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management ii libsoup2.2-7 2.2.3-2 an HTTP library implementation in ii libtasn1-2 0.2.10-4Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g
Processed: Fixed in NMU of ocamldsort 0.14.3-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 307708 + fixed Bug#307708: ocamldsort: Can't fulfill the build dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307914: infozip: privilege escalation, directory-traversal
Package: zip Version: 2.30-5woody2 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Please see http://lwn.net/Alerts/134228/ for the Slackware-Anouncement. As I understand it, it applies both to woody and Sarge, but maybe (as there is no CAN given on http://lwn.net/Articles/134238/) this is already fixed in Debian? If so, please take my apologies and close this bug. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pleione 2.4.26-grsec #1 Tue Aug 10 15:42:40 CEST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages zip depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307466: unison: Unison fails to upgrade here too
Package: unison Version: 2.10.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #307466 Errors were encountered while processing: unison unison-gtk E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover: Setting up unison (2.10.2-1) ... /usr/share/doc-base/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@-manual: cannot open control file for reading: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing unison (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of unison-gtk: unison-gtk depends on unison (= 2.10.2-1); however: Package unison is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing unison-gtk (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: unison unison-gtk -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages unison depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 307258
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307258 patch Bug#307258: Components.idl missing There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of openafs-krb5 1.3-10.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 304933 + fixed Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to function `afsconf_AddKey' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of krb4 1.2.2-11.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 175491 + fixed Bug#175491: krb4: configure did not find the h_errno macro Tags were: sid patch Bug#273615: krb4: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: function `__h_errno_location' is initialized like a variable Tags added: fixed tag 226899 + fixed Bug#226899: krb4: control file has double blank line There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 242694 + fixed Bug#242694: krb4: please remove non-ASCII characters from packages' description Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 273615 + fixed Bug#273615: krb4: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: function `__h_errno_location' is initialized like a variable Tags were: fixed sid patch Bug#175491: krb4: configure did not find the h_errno macro Tags added: fixed tag 306141 + fixed Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply() and env_opt_add() Tags were: sid sarge woody security patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 306141
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306141 - fixed sid Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply() and env_opt_add() Tags were: fixed sid sarge woody security patch Tags removed: fixed, sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1
hey christian, i've tested out the latest svn version, and it looks like the rm -rf problem is fixed. to test, i did the following: apt-get install the current unstable version of mysql-server and family apt-get install msyql-server-4.1 dpkg -P mysql-server say yes at debconf purge *boom*, as adrian says. apt-get install the current unstable version of mysql-server and family upgrade to svn version apt-get install msyql-server-4.1 dpkg -P mysql-server *nothing* however, i did still notice one problem. when you purge mysql-server, it still does all the debhelper-added code, so it stops the mysql daemon and attempts (unsuccessfully, because it still exists) to call update-rc.d to remove the runlevel symlinks. how to handle this is a little tricky. we could move the #DEBHELPER# statment inside the same if block, but there's other stuff in there we always want to execute (like purging debconf templates). we could call invoke-rc.d mysql start after the #DEBHELPER#, but that seems kind of kludgy too. what do you think? personally, i think the first option (plus manually adding db_purge and other stuff outside the if statement) sounds best, but maybe you have a better idea? sean -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to function `afsconf_AddKey'
[CC -release for approval]
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:38:18AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I won't speak for Sam on that, but incidentally, I've tested that the
following patch does indeed fix the compilation problem. It appears to be
correct so far as I can tell, although I alas don't have a suitable
environment for testing it completely.
Since this was the exact same solution that Sam also proposed in the
discussion about #196094 I've now uploaded an NMU with this patch.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Naur openafs-krb5-1.3.bak/debian/changelog
openafs-krb5-1.3/debian/changelog
--- openafs-krb5-1.3.bak/debian/changelog 2005-05-06 15:30:52.172212312
+0200
+++ openafs-krb5-1.3/debian/changelog 2005-05-06 15:58:48.035442376 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+openafs-krb5 (1.3-10.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Bug fix: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments
+to function `afsconf_AddKey', patch by Russ Allbery
+(Closes: #304933)
+ * Update config.sub and config.guess. I'm not sure if this is needed
+but it can't hurt.
+
+ -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 6 May 2005 15:52:33 +0200
+
openafs-krb5 (1.3-10) unstable; urgency=low
* Rebuild against krb5 1.3 beta3
diff -Naur openafs-krb5-1.3.bak/src/asetkey.c openafs-krb5-1.3/src/asetkey.c
--- openafs-krb5-1.3.bak/src/asetkey.c 2000-11-07 16:52:57.0 +0100
+++ openafs-krb5-1.3/src/asetkey.c 2005-05-06 15:53:21.818034960 +0200
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
exit(1);
}
- code = afsconf_AddKey(tdir, kvno, key-contents);
+ code = afsconf_AddKey(tdir, kvno, key-contents, 1);
if (code) {
printf(setkey: failed to set key, code %d.\n, code);
exit(1);
diff -Naur openafs-krb5-1.3.bak/src/config.guess
openafs-krb5-1.3/src/config.guess
--- openafs-krb5-1.3.bak/src/config.guess 2005-05-06 15:30:52.179211248
+0200
+++ openafs-krb5-1.3/src/config.guess 2005-05-06 15:57:58.167023528 +0200
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
#! /bin/sh
# Attempt to guess a canonical system name.
-# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
-# Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
+# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-timestamp='2001-09-04'
+timestamp='2005-04-22'
# This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -24,8 +24,9 @@
# configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
# the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
-# Written by Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED].
-# Please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
+# Originally written by Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED].
+# Please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Submit a context
+# diff and a properly formatted ChangeLog entry.
#
# This script attempts to guess a canonical system name similar to
# config.sub. If it succeeds, it prints the system name on stdout, and
@@ -52,7 +53,7 @@
GNU config.guess ($timestamp)
Originally written by Per Bothner.
-Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
+Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
@@ -87,30 +88,42 @@
exit 1
fi
+trap 'exit 1' 1 2 15
-dummy=dummy-$$
-trap 'rm -f $dummy.c $dummy.o $dummy.rel $dummy; exit 1' 1 2 15
+# CC_FOR_BUILD -- compiler used by this script. Note that the use of a
+# compiler to aid in system detection is discouraged as it requires
+# temporary files to be created and, as you can see below, it is a
+# headache to deal with in a portable fashion.
-# CC_FOR_BUILD -- compiler used by this script.
# Historically, `CC_FOR_BUILD' used to be named `HOST_CC'. We still
# use `HOST_CC' if defined, but it is deprecated.
-set_cc_for_build='case $CC_FOR_BUILD,$HOST_CC,$CC in
- ,,)echo int dummy(){} $dummy.c ;
- for c in cc gcc c89 ; do
- ($c $dummy.c -c -o $dummy.o) /dev/null 21 ;
- if test $? = 0 ; then
+# Portable tmp directory creation inspired by the Autoconf team.
+
+set_cc_for_build='
+trap exitcode=\$?; (rm -f \$tmpfiles 2/dev/null; rmdir \$tmp 2/dev/null)
exit \$exitcode 0 ;
+trap rm -f \$tmpfiles 2/dev/null; rmdir \$tmp 2/dev/null; exit 1 1 2 13 15
;
+: ${TMPDIR=/tmp} ;
+ { tmp=`(umask 077 mktemp -d -q $TMPDIR/cgXX) 2/dev/null` test -n
$tmp test -d $tmp ; } ||
+ { test -n $RANDOM tmp=$TMPDIR/cg$$-$RANDOM (umask 077 mkdir $tmp)
; } ||
+ { tmp=$TMPDIR/cg-$$ (umask 077 mkdir $tmp) echo Warning: creating
insecure temp directory 2 ; } ||
+ { echo $me: cannot create a temporary directory in $TMPDIR 2 ; exit 1 ; }
;
+dummy=$tmp/dummy ;
+tmpfiles=$dummy.c $dummy.o
Bug#306141: NMU for krb4 uploaded
I've uploaded an NMU for this issue. For -release: The patch can be found in the bug report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/krb4.1_2_2-11_2.patch?bug=306141msg=21att=1 Please approve krb4 1.2.2-11.2 Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Primoz wrote: I would be willing to fix and maintain the package if there is someone who would be willing to sponsor the upload. Please go ahead, I'll sponsor your uploads. Joerg -- Joerg joergland Wendland | http://www.wendlandnet.de/joerg/ GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 315E 657A F318 57A3 7FBD 51CF 8417 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#303466: marked as done (xfe: renaming to/from upper/lower case on vfat partitions deletes file)
Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2005 16:33:41 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed version in sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2005 20:38:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 06 13:38:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mini002.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.131] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DJHI7-0005Wc-00; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:38:23 -0700 Received: by mini002.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.34 using asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) from pd9e89f22.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.232.159.34] helo=zed.local.net) id 1DJHHc-0004qF-LK; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:37:52 +0200 Received: from andi by zed.local.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DJHHb-00044D-1K for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:37:51 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andreas Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xfe: renaming to/from upper/lower case on vfat partitions deletes file X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 22:37:50 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xfe Version: 0.66-6 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss Assume a file on a mounted vfat partition, called test. Trying to change it's name to Test will diplay a warning box: File /mnt/data/Test already exists. Overwrite? Upon confirmation with the Yes button, the file is immediately deleted, even before another Error box appears: Cannot rename to target /mnt/data/Test -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-andi-1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xfe depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfox1.0 1.0.52-2 The FOX C++ GUI Toolkit ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 303466-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 14:33:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 07:33:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU3tf-0006nx-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 07:33:43 -0700 Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DU3td-000170-RG for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 06 May 2005 16:33:41 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:33:41 +0200 From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed version in sarge Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: 0.72-6 has reached testing Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307171: marked as done (tela: FTBFS (sarge): Blas not found!)
Your message dated Fri, 6 May 2005 16:31:09 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed version in sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2005 11:44:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 01 04:44:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c203005.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DSCsL-00066s-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 04:44:42 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DSCsY-0007Es-Ie; Sun, 01 May 2005 13:44:54 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tela: FTBFS (sarge): Blas not found! Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 13:44:54 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: tela Version: 2.0-8 Severity: serious Tags: sarge When building 'tela' in a clean chroot on i386/testing, I get the following error: checking for completion_matches in -lreadline... yes checking for ddot in -lblas2... no configure: error: Blas not found! make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 The newer version 2.0-9 from sid, which is 122 days old and apparently waits for a build on arm, fixes this. Regards Andreas Jochens --- Received: (at 307171-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 14:31:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 07:31:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU3rD-0006LL-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 07:31:11 -0700 Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DU3rB-00016i-Ou for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 06 May 2005 16:31:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:31:09 +0200 From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed version in sarge Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: 2.0-10 has reached testing -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307931: evolution_2.2.2-3(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: missing depends
Package: evolution-data-server1.2 Version: 1.2.2-3 Severity: grave There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of evolution_2.2.2-3 on solitude by sbuild/mipsel 27 Build started at 20050505-1734 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: bison, intltool (= 0.28-2), debhelper (= 4.1.46), libgal2.4-dev (= 2.4.2), gtkhtml3.6 (= 3.6.2), libgtkhtml3.6-dev (= 3.6.2), libldap2-dev (= 2.0.23), libgnome2-dev (= 2.8), libnss-dev (= 2:1.7), scrollkeeper, psmisc, libsoup2.2-dev (= 2.2.2-1), libpam-dev, gnome-common, autotools-dev (= 20030717.1), libgnome-pilot2-dev, automake1.7, libgail-dev (= 1.4.1), libcompfaceg1-dev, gnome-icon-theme (= 1.2.0), cdbs, libdb4.2-dev, evolution-data-server1.2-dev (= 1.2.2-1), libgstreamer0.8-dev, dbus-1-dev, dbus-glib-1-dev [...] The following central src deps are (probably) missing: comerr-dev (= 1.33-3), libdb3-dev (= 3.2.9-19), libnspr4-dev (= 2:1.3) [...] clude/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gal-2.4 -I/usr/include/libgnomeprint-2.2 -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomeprintui-2.2 -I/usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.2 -I/usr/include/mozilla/nspr -fPIC -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -MT md5-utils.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/md5-utils.Tpo -c md5-utils.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/md5-utils.o /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link cc -fPIC -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-sign-compare -o libeutil.la -rpath /usr/lib/evolution/2.2 e-util-marshal.lo e-account-list.lo e-account.lo e-bconf-map.lo e-categories-config.lo e-categories-master-list-wombat.lo e-component-listener.lo e-config.lo e-config-listener.lo e-corba-utils.lo e-dialog-utils.lo e-dialog-widgets.lo e-event.lo e-folder-map.lo e-fsutils.lo e-gtk-utils.lo e-gui-utils.lo e-html-utils.lo e-icon-factory.lo e-iterator.lo e-list-iterator.lo e-list.lo e-menu.lo e-mktemp.lo e-plugin.lo e-popup.lo e-print.lo e-request.lo e-signature.lo e-signature-list.lo e-time-utils.lo e-uid.lo eggtrayicon.lo md5-utils.lo -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgal-2.4 -lgal-a11y-2.4 -lglade-2.0 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lgnomeprintui-2-2 -lgnomeprint-2-2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -ledataserveru i-1.2 -ledataserver-1.2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lpthread -L/usr/lib/mozilla -ldl -lplc4 -lplds4 -lnspr4 -lpthread grep: /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.la: No such file or directory /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libdb-4.1.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libdb-4.1.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[4]: *** [libeutil.la] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/evolution-2.2.2/e-util' make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/evolution-2.2.2/e-util' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/evolution-2.2.2' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/evolution-2.2.2' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=mipselpkg=evolutionver=2.2.2-3 e-d-s1.2 was changed to use the system libdb 4.1. However, evolution-data-server1.2-dev doesn't depend on libdb4.1-dev
Processed: tagging 307708
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307708 + sarge Bug#307708: ocamldsort: Can't fulfill the build dependencies Tags were: fixed Tags added: sarge End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298939: Regarding xfree86 and CAN-2005-0609
Hi Joey, xfree86's fix for CAN-2005-0609 has not yet been uploaded to testing/unstable. I expect to make an upload soon, however; the packages are currently in preparation, and you can view the current status of the SVN trunk at: http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/svn/xfree86/trunk/ specifically: http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/svn/xfree86/trunk/debian/changelog Please go ahead and do the advisory for woody's xfree86 once you're ready. I've been working with vorlon regarding 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13, and there's no reason to expect that release to not fix CAN-2005-0609. -- G. Branden Robinson| Suffer before God and ye shall be Debian GNU/Linux | redeemed. God loves us, so He [EMAIL PROTECTED] | makes us suffer Christianity. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Aaron Dunsmore signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: [debget] all RC bugs closed with this patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 278675 + patch Bug#278675: debget: relies on outdated archive structure There were no tags set. Bug#84368: debget: doesn't support package pools Tags added: patch tags 84368 + patch Bug#84368: debget: doesn't support package pools Tags were: patch Bug#278675: debget: relies on outdated archive structure Tags added: patch tags 306924 + patch Bug#306924: Always returns Prototype mismatch: sub main::getopt: none vs (@) at /usr/bin/debget line 257. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#84368: [debget] all RC bugs closed with this patch
tags 278675 + patch
tags 84368 + patch
tags 306924 + patch
thanks
Hello, I know debget is not in testing and is supposed to be removed
soon, anyway, the patch here will fix all of those RC bugs against it.
If that can help...
--
Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sukria.net
« Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. »
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
--- /usr/bin/debget 2005-05-06 16:26:11.038703952 +0200
+++ debget 2005-05-06 17:17:45.119332200 +0200
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
# Getopt::Long has some really awful defaults. This function loads it
# then configures it to use more sane settings.
-sub getopt;
+sub getopt(@);
sub configure_getopt {
Getopt::Long-import(2.11);
*getopt = \Getopt::Long::GetOptions;
@@ -302,21 +302,37 @@
# (source/binary) for the given DISTRIBUTION, SECTION1 and SECTION2.
sub file_dir {
-my ($type, $dist, $sec1, $sec2) = @_;
+my ($type, $dist, $sec1, $sec2, $package) = @_;
+
+# first generate the prefix
+my $initial = $package;
+$initial =~ s/^(.).*$/$1/ if $package !~ /^lib/;
+$initial =~ s/^(.{4}).*$/$1/ if $package =~ /^lib/;
$sec2 = /$sec2 if $sec2 ne '';
+my $prefix = ;
+# experimental is the simple case
if ($dist eq 'experimental') {
return 'project/experimental';
}
-if ($type eq 'source') {
- return dists/$dist/$sec1/source$sec2;
+# for unstable and testing, look to the pool
+# debian/pool/$section/$initial/$sourcepackage/
+elsif ($dist eq 'testing' or $dist eq 'unstable') {
+ $prefix = pool/$sec1/$initial;
+ return $prefix/$package;
}
+# Here, we manage the stable stuff
+$prefix = dists/$dist/$sec1;
+
if ($type eq 'binary') {
my $arch = arch;
- return dists/$dist/$sec1/binary-$arch$sec2;
+ return $prefix/binary-$arch$sec2;
+}
+elsif ($type eq 'source') {
+ return $prefix/source$sec2;
}
xdie invalid type `$type';
@@ -507,13 +523,13 @@
my ($s1, $s2, $p) = package_section package_source($package),
$orig_package;
push @ret, [host_dir($s1),
- file_dir('source', $O{'dist'}, $s1, $s2),
+ file_dir('source', $O{'dist'}, $s1, $s2, $package),
^\Q$p\E_.*\\.(dsc|tar\\.gz|diff\\.gz)\$];
}
if ($O{'binary'}) {
my $arch = arch;
push @ret, [host_dir($sec1),
- file_dir('binary', $O{'dist'}, $sec1, $sec2),
+ file_dir('binary', $O{'dist'}, $sec1, $sec2, $package),
^\Q$package\E_[^_]+(_(\Q$arch\E|all))?\\.deb\$];
}
return @ret;
Bug#299272: Regarding xfree86 and CAN-2005-0609
Branden Robinson wrote: Hi Joey, xfree86's fix for CAN-2005-0609 has not yet been uploaded to testing/unstable. I expect to make an upload soon, however; the packages are currently in preparation, and you can view the current status of the SVN trunk at: http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/svn/xfree86/trunk/ specifically: http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/svn/xfree86/trunk/debian/changelog Please go ahead and do the advisory for woody's xfree86 once you're ready. I've been working with vorlon regarding 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13, and there's no reason to expect that release to not fix CAN-2005-0609. Understood. Do you want me to write that it'll be fixed in 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 or should I write that it will be fixed soon? Regards, Joey -- If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307935: locales: does not work in non-interactive mode
Package: locales Version: 2.3.2.ds1-21 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.10.1 heavily rely on the ability to do unattended installs of debian and as of recent the locales package has started prompting, which causes my build process to hang indefinetly. I have always relied on the non-interactive settings of debconf to solve this and now it seems the package is ignoring that. Rick -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.30-mcs-x86 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-21] 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- debconf information: * locales/default_environment_locale: en_US * locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_AU ISO-8859-1, en_BW ISO-8859-1, en_CA ISO-8859-1, en_DK ISO-8859-1, en_GB ISO-8859-1, en_GB.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_HK ISO-8859-1, en_IE ISO-8859-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, en_IN UTF-8, en_NZ ISO-8859-1, en_PH ISO-8859-1, en_SG ISO-8859-1, en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_ZA ISO-8859-1, en_ZW ISO-8859-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 307794
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 307794 patch Bug#307794: xosd: FTBFS: X11 not threadsafe There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: gnome-doc-utils: sarge still has this bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 306107 Bug#306107: gnome-doc-utils: FTBFS: missing build-depends Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 306107 sarge Bug#306107: gnome-doc-utils: FTBFS: missing build-depends There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306107: gnome-doc-utils: sarge still has this bug
reopen 306107 tags 306107 sarge thanks Version 0.1.3-2 of gnome-doc-utils, which is currently in sarge, still has this bug. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307473: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:57:05PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: The first statement sounds better but I'm not sure if #DEBHELPER# gets replaced if it's not the very last statement. So if we include the i'm pretty sure it does. from debhelper(7): Some debhelper commands will automatically generate parts of debian maintainer scripts. If you want these automatically generated things included in your existing debian maintainer scripts, then you need to add #DEBHELPER# to your scripts, in the place the code should be added. #DEBHELPER# will be replaced by any auto-generated code when you run dh_installdeb. relevant parts by hand we have to check every now and then that debhelper does not add something we would like to have in the script, too. yeah, we'll still have to do that. another option would be do dh_instalinit -n in debian/rules, which would not add the init script debhelper code, and then manually put that in the right place (so then the only thing we'd have to keep track of would be changes in init script handling policy) sean -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307794: xosd: FTBFS: X11 not threadsafe
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:37:21PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
appending configuration tag F77 to libtool
checking for X... no
checking for gtk-config... /usr/bin/gtk-config
checking for GTK - version = 1.2.2... yes
checking for XInitThreads in -lX11... no
configure: error: *** X11 not threadsafe ***
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
An patch that should fix that issue is attached.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Naur xosd-2.2.14.bak/configure xosd-2.2.14/configure
--- xosd-2.2.14.bak/configure 2004-11-17 20:30:24.0 +0100
+++ xosd-2.2.14/configure 2005-05-06 17:56:30.804738240 +0200
@@ -1171,7 +1171,7 @@
else
echo $as_me: WARNING: no configuration information is in $ac_dir 2
fi
-cd $ac_popdir
+cd $ac_popdir
done
fi
@@ -2561,8 +2561,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -2620,8 +2619,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -2737,8 +2735,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -2792,8 +2789,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -2838,8 +2834,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -2883,8 +2878,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -3784,7 +3778,7 @@
;;
*-*-irix6*)
# Find out which ABI we are using.
- echo '#line 3787 configure' conftest.$ac_ext
+ echo '#line 3781 configure' conftest.$ac_ext
if { (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_compile\) 5
(eval $ac_compile) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -3904,8 +3898,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -4214,8 +4207,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -4385,8 +4377,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
@@ -4453,8 +,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
(exit $ac_status); }
-{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag
-|| test ! -s conftest.err'
+{ ac_try='test -z $ac_c_werror_flag || test ! -s
conftest.err'
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO:
Bug#294346: guessnet/sarge missing Depends: iproute
severity 294346 serious
tags 294346 + sarge
tags 294346 + patch
thanks
According to http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt
- Packages must include a Depends: line listing any other packages
they require for operation, unless those packages are marked
Essential: yes.
I had the same problem and had to install the iproute package, which
fixed it.
It seems to me that this should be added to the Depends so that is is
installed automatically, so I'm attaching a patch to that effect against
guessnet 0.35-1.
By the way, this package has been a great help to me, thanks for
maintaining it.
Dave.
--
Encrypted Mail Preferred:
Key ID: 8527B9AF
Key Fingerprint: E1B6 40B6 B73F 695E 0D3B 644E 6427 DD74 8527 B9AF
Information: http://www.gnupg.org/
ASCII ribbon campaign:
() against HTML email
/\ against Microsoft attachments
Information: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--- guessnet-0.35-old/debian/control2004-11-23 17:38:58.0 -0700
+++ guessnet-0.35/debian/control2005-05-05 21:50:22.708744012 -0600
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Package: guessnet
Architecture: any
Enhances: ifupdown
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: iproute, ${shlibs:Depends}
Suggests: pppoe, waproamd, ifplugd
Description: Guess which LAN a network device is connected to
Guessnet is a non-aggressive network detection tool to use when moving
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#307838: marked as done (unsecure temp file)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 12:32:06 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307838: fixed in fai 2.8.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 19:37:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 12:37:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rubens.informatik.uni-koeln.de [134.95.9.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTm9n-0007ot-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 12:37:11 -0700 Received: from rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j45JbA2r008593 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 5 May 2005 21:37:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by rubens.informatik.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) id j45Jb9TI008590; Thu, 5 May 2005 21:37:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 21:37:09 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unsecure temp file X-Mailer: VM 7.05 under Emacs 21.2.1 CC: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: fai Version: 2.8.1 Severity: serious The script lib/updatebase creates unsecure temp file when called from task softupdate. This violates the policy. -- regards Thomas --- Received: (at 307838-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 16:43:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 09:43:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU5vi-0004eK-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 09:43:58 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU5kE-Td-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 12:32:06 -0400 From: Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307838: fixed in fai 2.8.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 12:32:06 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: fai Source-Version: 2.8.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fai, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fai_2.8.2.dsc to pool/main/f/fai/fai_2.8.2.dsc fai_2.8.2.tar.gz to pool/main/f/fai/fai_2.8.2.tar.gz fai_2.8.2_all.deb to pool/main/f/fai/fai_2.8.2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated fai package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 09:23:34 +0200 Source: fai Binary: fai Architecture: source all Version: 2.8.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: fai- Fully Automatic Installation Closes: 307631 307632 307838 Changes: fai (2.8.2) unstable; urgency=high . * remove old unused scripts from cvs source * updatebase: use mktemp for creating temp file, this closes a serious security bug (closes: #307838) * fai: create dir only during initial installation, fixes a critical bug (closes: #307632) * subroutines-linux: do not mount --bind when FAI_ROOT=/, closes important bug (closes: #307631) Files: 82e5de30184fb23bcd6883210e448cdd 524
Bug#307632: marked as done (creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile))
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 12:32:06 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307632: fixed in fai 2.8.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 10:53:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 04 03:53:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zs04.physik.fu-berlin.de [160.45.35.155] ([U2FsdGVkX1/mzo6neJjcqbcw37/NeeqSYLqgOZk1BGo=]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTHVU-Gi-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 03:53:32 -0700 Received: from burns.physik.fu-berlin.de ([160.45.33.1]) by zs04.physik.fu-berlin.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DTHVO-0001Kp-Pm for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 04 May 2005 12:53:28 +0200 Received: from glaweh by burns.physik.fu-berlin.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DTHVO-0004ze-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 04 May 2005 12:53:26 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1045752262== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Henning Glawe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 12:53:26 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Henning Glawe [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Scanned: No viruses found. X-Scan-Signature: 895856e2e0e98ff487e29a7779571294 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1045752262== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: fai Version: 2.8.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch * BUGFIX: create /tmp/fai only when DO_INIT_TASKS /tmp/fai was created, but not used when performing softupdates and not removed afterwards basically, this violates policy 10.4, because: Any scripts which create files in world-writeable directories (e.g., in `/tmp') must use a mechanism which will fail if a file with the same name already exists. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages fai depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.13 Perl interface to libapt-pkg ii perl 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --===1045752262== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=20050503174352--BUGFIX_create_tmp_fai_only_when_DO_INIT_TASKS.diff Tue May 3 19:43:52 CEST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * BUGFIX: create /tmp/fai only when DO_INIT_TASKS /tmp/fai was created, but not used when performing softupdates and not removed afterwards diff -rN -u old-pfai/scripts/fai new-pfai/scripts/fai --- old-pfai/scripts/fai2005-05-03 19:46:32.577839000 +0200 +++ new-pfai/scripts/fai2005-05-03 19:40:47.0 +0200 @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ # directory where temporary log files are stored # set default value if nothing is set in fai.conf -if [ -z $LOGDIR ]; then +if [ -z $LOGDIR -a $DO_INIT_TASKS -eq 1 ]; then LOGDIR=/tmp/fai mkdir -p $LOGDIR fi --===1045752262==-- --- Received: (at 307632-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 16:43:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 09:43:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU5v7-0004EC-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 09:43:21 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU5kE-Tb-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 12:32:06 -0400 From: Thomas Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307632: fixed in fai 2.8.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 12:32:06 -0400
Processed: tagging 306884, severity of 306884 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 306884 sid Bug#306884: modutils update conflicts with module-init-tools There were no tags set. Tags added: sid severity 306884 serious Bug#306884: modutils update conflicts with module-init-tools Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 294346
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 294346 - sarge Bug#294346: /usr/share/guessnet/test/test-wireless: line 52: ip: command not found Tags were: patch sarge Tags removed: sarge End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307919: advi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on groff-base
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:19:11PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: advi Version: 1.6.0-5 Severity: normal Tags: patch I just rechecked this. When trying to build advi in a clean chroot environment on amd64/sarge and also on i386/sarge, I get the following: (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/pdfmark.def)) ! LaTeX Error: File `advi.sty' not found. Same problem here (i386) when trying to compile advi without having advi installed. I guess that setting the TEXINPUTS variable in the rules file to include ./tex should do it. Please don't NMU, I will have a look into this right now. -Ralf. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#267101: marked as done (termpkg: remote root vulnerabilities)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 14:02:24 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#267101: fixed in termpkg 3.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2004 18:08:35 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 20 11:08:35 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (mx01.hinterhof.net) [83.137.99.112]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ByDoZ-0006B0-00; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:08:35 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mx01.hinterhof.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1948610572
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:09:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nautile.roam.hinterhof.net (pD95D0DB7.dip.t-dialin.net
[217.93.13.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN nautile.roam.hinterhof.net, Issuer
hinterhofCertificateAuthority (verified OK))
by mx01.hinterhof.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88961056A
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:09:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by nautile.roam.hinterhof.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D039910ADFC; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:08:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:08:24 +0200
From: Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: termpkg: remote root vulnerabilities
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
LARGE_HEX autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: termpkg
Version: 3.3-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
these bugs still apply. Not tagging +patch since I haven't really
tested them.
Cheers.
Max
--
308E81E7B97963BCA0E6ED889D5BD511B7CDA2DC
- Forwarded message from Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: termpkg vulnerabilites
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:00:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Hi Oliver,
[ CCing Security Team for vulns in the testing version ]
there are a few bugs in termpkg/termnetd that can introduce security
problems and potentially lead to remote root compromise. In Debian only
testing and unstable are affected. I looked at version 3.3-1.
Feel free to forward this info as you like. Unless you want me to delay
disclosure to the BTS, or the fixed package has already entered sarge by
then, I'll file +security bugs for these vulns in 10 days or so.
In short:
o buffer overflow in getOption() reading telnet suboption from the
client; reachable from termnetd.
o buffer overflow in tnlSsetSubOption() and doSubOption(); A string
of up to 256 bytes is strcpy()ed into a 128-bytes char array. The
code is also reachable from the network in termnetd.
o buffer overflow in commands-handling on the control connection port,
if enabled in termnetd (Not by default AFAICS). The bug repeats in
other parts of the control connection functions.
o buffer overflow in parseRE(), also reachable from the control
connection port.
getOption() overflow
termpkg-3.3/libtn/tnlSubOptions.c:
30 static int option, optionCnt;
31 STatic char *pOption, optionBuffer[256];
32 static int dbg = 0;
33
..
72 /*
73 ** This function stores the character passed into the
74 ** suboption buffer, then increments the pointer in
75 ** anticipation of the next character.
76 */
77 static void getOption(int ch)
78 {
79 if (strlen(optionBuffer) sizeof(optionBuffer) - 1)
80 {
81*(pOption++) = ch;
82*pOption = '\0';
83 }
84 }
85
The strlen() call here tries to catch possible overflows, but doesn't
take into account that '\0' is among the values that can be written
using getOption(). This can effectively circumvent that bounds check
and cause writes to memory past the end of optionBuffer.
There is a FILE pointer next to optionBuffer on my local i386 local
debug build that gets overwritten. If an attacker was to change the
pointer to a fake but valid FILE structure, this may enable him/her
to execute arbitrary code as root.
Would it
Processed: Re: Bug#307935: locales: does not work in non-interactive mode
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 307935 important Bug#307935: locales: does not work in non-interactive mode Severity set to `important'. tags 307935 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#307935: locales: does not work in non-interactive mode There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307784: pam-pgsql: CAN-2004-0366
Is there a way to revert the upload to the NMUed one (which had security problems fixed), so package stays in sarge. I would need at least a week to 14 days to port pam-mysql to pgsql (which seems like the best way to go). Primoz On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:03 +0200, Joerg Wendland wrote: On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Primoz wrote: I would be willing to fix and maintain the package if there is someone who would be willing to sponsor the upload. Please go ahead, I'll sponsor your uploads. Joerg signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#306107: gnome-doc-utils: sarge still has this bug
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 06:06:05PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: reopen 306107 tags 306107 sarge thanks Version 0.1.3-2 of gnome-doc-utils, which is currently in sarge, still has this bug. Pushed in; should reach testing tomorrow. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294099: backported fix for lesstif1
I have made a backport of CAN-2004-0914 and CAN-2005-0605 fixes for lesstif1 available at http://www.inside.org/~kimju/src/lesstif/ It compiles, but is currently untested. Please review and/or test before using. Please feel free to send any comments about this patch to me. -kimju -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopening 307838, reopening 307632, tagging 307838, tagging 307632
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reopen 307838 Bug#307838: unsecure temp file Bug reopened, originator not changed. reopen 307632 Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile) Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 307838 sarge Bug#307838: unsecure temp file There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge # t-p-u upload needed for these bugs tags 307632 sarge Bug#307632: creates /tmp/fai directory unconditionally (insecure tempfile) Tags were: security patch Tags added: sarge End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307948: scite_1.63-2 (unstable): fails to build from source
Package: scite Version: 1.63-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of scite_1.63-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 27 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 2), libgtk2.0-dev, libglib2.0-dev Warning: The following central src deps are (probably) missing: libglib1.2-dev (= 1.2.0) Checking for already installed source dependencies... debhelper: missing libgtk2.0-dev: missing libglib2.0-dev: missing [...] Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-21 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.6-2 g++-3.3_1:3.3.6-2 binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.6-2 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.6-2 -- dpkg-source: extracting scite in scite-1.63 dpkg-buildpackage: source package is scite dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.63-2 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is s390 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dpatch deapply-all make: dpatch: Command not found make: *** [unpatch] Error 127 ** Build finished at 20050506-2056 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] [...] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS from aborted connections
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 305605 important Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS from aborted connections Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307919: marked as done (advi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on groff-base)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 15:47:08 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307919: fixed in advi 1.6.0-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 13:19:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 06:19:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c174134.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.174.134] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU2je-0007nP-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 06:19:18 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DU2jX-0002rn-Aq; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:19:11 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 15:19:11 +0200 To: Debian-OCaml-Liste debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: advi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on groff-base Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: advi Version: 1.6.0-5 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello Helge, On 05-May-06 14:32, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Hello Andreas, I saw by chance your list in http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00166.html There you state: advi - + missing Build-Depends on groff-base To check this, I just rebuild advi on my amd64-machine (running Sarge) *without* groff-base installed, and it build fine. Please do *not* remove advi from Sarge and if there is a FTBS, then *please* file a proper bug report so that I can fix it (or someone of the OCAML-Team/some NMUler). I apologize for not having filed a proper bug report for this problem earlier. I just rechecked this. When trying to build advi in a clean chroot environment on amd64/sarge and also on i386/sarge, I get the following: (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/pdfmark.def)) ! LaTeX Error: File `advi.sty' not found. Type X to quit or RETURN to proceed, or enter new name. (Default extension: sty) Enter file name: and then the build stops and waits for input. With an additional Build-Depends on groff-base, the package builds fine. Despite the fact that you said you can build the package without groff-base, I file this as 'serious', because I can reproduce this on i386 with the following simple commands: su apt-get remove groff-base apt-get source advi cd advi-1.6.0 dpkg-buildpackage I hope that I did not miss anything. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/advi-1.6.0/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/advi-1.6.0/debian/control 2005-04-29 20:13:09.834629142 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-04-29 20:13:02.436753790 +0200 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org Uploaders: Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jerome Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED], Remi Vanicat [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael K. Edwards (in Debian context) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), tetex-bin, ocaml-3.08.3, libncurses5-dev, xlibs-dev, libcamlimages-ocaml-dev (= 2.20-1), tetex-extra, zlib1g-dev, gs, dpatch, chrpath, ocaml-best-compilers, hevea +Build-Depends: debhelper, groff-base, tetex-bin, ocaml-3.08.3, libncurses5-dev, xlibs-dev, libcamlimages-ocaml-dev (= 2.20-1), tetex-extra, zlib1g-dev, gs, dpatch, chrpath, ocaml-best-compilers, hevea Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: advi --- Received: (at 307919-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 19:53:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 12:53:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU8t1-0002Im-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 12:53:23 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DU8my-0007CK-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:47:08 -0400 From: Ralf Treinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
Bug#305605: CAN-2005-0718: remote DoS from aborted connections
severity 305605 important thanks I'm downgrading severity of this bug from RC to important because (if it exists at all), it only applies to woody, so is not 'release critical' for sarge. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#302643: Still in repository?
This bug is tagged both experimental and fixed-in-experimental. Should we understand that it's fixed in the only release it affects? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307883: marked as done (gnumeric-doc: docs package doesn't contain any docs!)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 17:32:35 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307883: fixed in gnumeric 1.4.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 04:36:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 21:36:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 209-204-169-32.dsl.static.sonic.net (luther.lothar.com) [209.204.169.32] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DTuZU-0006Vu-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 21:36:16 -0700 Received: (qmail 15197 invoked from network); 6 May 2005 04:36:16 - Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.lan with SMTP; 6 May 2005 04:36:16 - Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnumeric-doc: docs package doesn't contain any docs! X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gnumeric-doc Severity: grave I recently upgraded a system from gnumeric-doc version 1.4.3-4 to 1.4.3-5, and noticed that the installed-size dropped from about 6MB to 90k. Sure enough, the entire contents of /usr/share/gnumeric/1.4.3/doc/ have vanished, making this a significantly less-useful package :). I don't see any evidence that the docs have been moved to a different package, so I assume that some error has crept in, resulting in a mostly empty package. cheers, -Brian -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 307883-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 21:43:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 14:43:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUAbn-0002AR-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 14:43:43 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUAR1-0006XR-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 17:32:35 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307883: fixed in gnumeric 1.4.3-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 17:32:35 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gnumeric Source-Version: 1.4.3-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnumeric, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnumeric-common_1.4.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnumeric/gnumeric-common_1.4.3-6_all.deb gnumeric-doc_1.4.3-6_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnumeric/gnumeric-doc_1.4.3-6_all.deb gnumeric-plugins-extra_1.4.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnumeric/gnumeric-plugins-extra_1.4.3-6_i386.deb gnumeric_1.4.3-6.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnumeric/gnumeric_1.4.3-6.diff.gz gnumeric_1.4.3-6.dsc to pool/main/g/gnumeric/gnumeric_1.4.3-6.dsc gnumeric_1.4.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnumeric/gnumeric_1.4.3-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnumeric package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP
Processed: No this is not a bug!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 306593 important Bug#306593: jswat: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'j2sdk1.4' Severity set to `important'. severity 306294 important Bug#306294: jswat2: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on j2sdk1.4 Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of orbit 0.5.17-11.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 307122 + fixed Bug#307122: shlibs incorrect There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307122: shlibs incorrect
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:53:55AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: The latest orbit version has a broken shlibs such that packages building against orbit won't depend anymore on a sufficiently high liborbit version. NMU uploaded with the following patch: diff -Naur orbit-0.5.17.bak/debian/changelog orbit-0.5.17/debian/changelog --- orbit-0.5.17.bak/debian/changelog 2005-05-06 23:47:36.674239296 +0200 +++ orbit-0.5.17/debian/changelog 2005-05-06 23:57:49.684047640 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +orbit (0.5.17-11.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix shlibs (Closes: #307122) + + -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 6 May 2005 23:48:26 +0200 + orbit (0.5.17-11) unstable; urgency=low * Disable broken IPv6 support. Thanks, Kaare Hviid. diff -Naur orbit-0.5.17.bak/debian/rules orbit-0.5.17/debian/rules --- orbit-0.5.17.bak/debian/rules 2005-05-06 23:47:36.681238232 +0200 +++ orbit-0.5.17/debian/rules 2005-05-06 23:53:54.218843792 +0200 @@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk -DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_liborbit2 := -V 'liborbit2 $(shlibver)' +DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_liborbit0 := -V 'liborbit0 $(shlibver)' DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --with-gtk-prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --infodir=/usr/share/info Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Seems to be not sid only and might have a different cause
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 306884 -sid Bug#306884: modutils update conflicts with module-init-tools Tags were: sid Tags removed: sid thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306884: Seems to be not sid only and might have a different cause
tags 306884 -sid thanks Hi Frank, I do not understand why you tagged this bug (modutils update conflicts with module-init-tools) sid. As you can easily verify, /usr/share/man/man5/modules.5.gz is the same in both the sarge and the sid packages of modutils. I don't know what happened, but it seems on Matthias' computer the diversions from module-init-tools are somehow broken. @Matthias: Please send the output of: dpkg-divert --list module-init-tools ls -la /usr/share/man/man5/modules.* cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307977: udev unmounts devpts and does not remount it
Package: udev Version: 0.056-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software During startup, udev runs at a priority 4 after the initial run of mountvirtfs at pri 2, and it unmounts /dev/pts while it fribs the ramdisk onto /dev, but doesn't remount /dev/pts afterwards. This means the system is broken for all the startup scripts until the later run of mountvirtfs at 36. In particular, this breaks the functionality of bootlogd on my system (which is using devfs because its nfs-diskless booted). Not really convinced this merits severity critical, but by a literal reading of the severity specs... A patch is pretty trivial - just add a thingy opposite to unmount_devpts to run after mount_extra_nodes Hope its not too late to fix this for sarge! -- Package-specific info: -- /etc/udev/rules.d/: /etc/udev/rules.d/: total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 May 6 20:34 020_permissions.rules - ../permissions.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Dec 16 00:21 cd-aliases.rules - ../cd-aliases.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Dec 16 00:21 udev.rules - ../udev.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 May 6 20:35 z_hal-plugdev.rules - ../hal.rules -- /sys/: /sys/block/hdd/dev /sys/block/loop0/dev /sys/block/loop1/dev /sys/block/loop2/dev /sys/block/loop3/dev /sys/block/loop4/dev /sys/block/loop5/dev /sys/block/loop6/dev /sys/block/loop7/dev /sys/block/ram0/dev /sys/block/ram1/dev /sys/block/ram10/dev /sys/block/ram11/dev /sys/block/ram12/dev /sys/block/ram13/dev /sys/block/ram14/dev /sys/block/ram15/dev /sys/block/ram2/dev /sys/block/ram3/dev /sys/block/ram4/dev /sys/block/ram5/dev /sys/block/ram6/dev /sys/block/ram7/dev /sys/block/ram8/dev /sys/block/ram9/dev /sys/block/sda/dev /sys/block/sda/sda1/dev /sys/block/sda/sda4/dev /sys/class/graphics/fb0/dev /sys/class/input/event0/dev /sys/class/input/event1/dev /sys/class/input/event2/dev /sys/class/input/mice/dev /sys/class/input/mouse0/dev /sys/class/input/ts0/dev /sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev /sys/class/misc/psaux/dev /sys/class/misc/rtc/dev /sys/class/printer/lp0/dev /sys/class/sound/adsp/dev /sys/class/sound/audio/dev /sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev /sys/class/sound/dsp/dev /sys/class/sound/mixer/dev /sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev /sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev /sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1c/dev /sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1p/dev /sys/class/sound/timer/dev -- Kernel configuration: -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages udev depends on: ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-22 Linux Hotplug Scripts ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-1 Standard scripts needed for bootin ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii makedev 2.3.1-77creates device files in /dev ii sed 4.1.2-8 The GNU sed stream editor -- debconf information: udev/devfs-warning: * udev/reboot-warning: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#307977: udev unmounts devpts and does not remount it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 307977 minor Bug#307977: udev unmounts devpts and does not remount it Severity set to `minor'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merge them
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 306383 302643 Bug#302643: synaptic: FTBFS in experimental Bug#306383: synaptic/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: undeclared variable Merged 302643 306383. thanks, and sorry for the duplicate bug (should've checked ;-) Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307977: udev unmounts devpts and does not remount it
severity 307977 minor thanks On May 07, Brian Brunswick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: During startup, udev runs at a priority 4 after the initial run of mountvirtfs at pri 2, and it unmounts /dev/pts while it fribs the ramdisk onto /dev, but doesn't remount /dev/pts afterwards. This means the system is broken for all the startup scripts until the later run of mountvirtfs at 36. This is OK, there is a reason why mountvirtfs is run two times. In particular, this breaks the functionality of bootlogd on my system bootlogd breaks in many situations. The (bad) workaround which I suggest is to move its init script to run at S04. I have no plan to change the udev init script soon. Post-sarge, I will discuss the issue with the initscripts maintainer and we will hopefully agree on a solution. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#307122: How to properly fix the liborbit0 shlibs breakage?
Hi Jeroen, now that Frank has uploaded a NMU for this bug (shlibs incorrect in liborbit0), the breakage already caused should be fixed some time after this fixed package has reached sarge (to catch all possible t-p-u or s-p-u uploads of broken packages). Thankfully, it seems all broken binary packages are easily identifiable due to the unversioned liborbit0 dependency. What's the best way to handle packages with such a broken dependency on one or more architectures? Binary NMUs? By whom (needs access to all 11 architectures including the ability to install packages)? RC bugs? cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307982: kernel-patch-adeos: Kernel 2.4.27 does not build with Adeos patch
Package: kernel-patch-adeos Version: 3.1.0-3 Severity: critical Adding the Adeos patch causes the kernel compilation process to fail as follows: sudo make-kpkg --revision 1:up.20050506.1 --added-patch adeos --append-to-version -adeos --config menuconfig kernel_image Please ignore the warning about overriding and ignoring targets above. These are harmless. They are only invoked in a part of the process that tries to snarf variable values for the conf.vars file. echo done stamp-configure test -f stamp-configure || /usr/bin/make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/rules configure /usr/bin/make EXTRAVERSION=-adeos ARCH=i386 \ bzImage make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernellab.1115429168.30567/kernel-source-2.4.27' . . . . make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernellab.1115429168.30567/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel' /usr/bin/make all_targets make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernellab.1115429168.30567/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/kernellab.1115429168.30567/kernel-source-2.4.27/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=fork -c -o fork.o fork.c fork.c:423: error: parse error before this_object_must_be_defined_as_export_objs_in_the_Makefile fork.c:423: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `this_object_must_be_defined_as_export_objs_in_the_Makefile' fork.c:423: warning: data definition has no type or storage class make[3]: *** [fork.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernellab.1115429168.30567/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel' make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernellab.1115429168.30567/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel' make[1]: *** [_dir_kernel] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernellab.1115429168.30567/kernel-source-2.4.27' make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-adeos Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kernel-patch-adeos depends on: ii bash 2.05b-26 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii grep-dctrl2.1.10 Grep Debian package information ii patch 2.5.9-2Apply a diff file to an original -- no debconf information -- In order to attain the impossible, one must attempt the absurd. --Miguel de Cervantes, _Don Quixote_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 307982 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 307982 grave Bug#307982: kernel-patch-adeos: Kernel 2.4.27 does not build with Adeos patch Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307122: How to properly fix the liborbit0 shlibs breakage?
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 02:17:34AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: now that Frank has uploaded a NMU for this bug (shlibs incorrect in liborbit0), the breakage already caused should be fixed some time after this fixed package has reached sarge (to catch all possible t-p-u or s-p-u uploads of broken packages). Thankfully, it seems all broken binary packages are easily identifiable due to the unversioned liborbit0 dependency. What's the best way to handle packages with such a broken dependency on one or more architectures? Binary NMUs? By whom (needs access to all 11 architectures including the ability to install packages)? RC bugs? Depends on the affected architectures. A list of currently affected packages (I've found no cases where the liborbit0 depends is at the end of a Depnds line in case someone wonders) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/packages.debian.org/files/archive$ grep-dctrl -sPackage -n -FDepends liborbit0, testing_*Packages | sort | uniq libgnome-vfs-common libgnome-vfs0 liborbit-dev orbit sgcontrol [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/packages.debian.org/files/archive$ grep-dctrl -sPackage -n -FDepends liborbit0, unstable_*Packages | sort | uniq bonobo libbonobo2 libgnome-vfs-common libgnome-vfs0 liborbit-dev orbit sgcontrol For sgcontrol, only arm seems affected, for gnome-vfs all arches, same for bonobo. So I would say binNMU for sgcontrol and source-full uploads for the other two. Let's hope we don't get way more of these... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292478: bug duplicated
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:40:37AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Thu, 05 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote: I duplicated the bug on my athalon xp 2000+ system running the latest 2.6.8 k7 sid kernel 2.6.8-15. could you post your oops? attached. It took a while to find the serial console howto and the proper cables. i guess with the kernel-image-2.6.11 that problem disappears? this will be tested... -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 obfuscate ttyS0 obfuscate login: BroadcastLinux version 2.6.8-2-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8)) #1 Tue Mar 22 14:14:00 EST 2005 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - 3fff (usable) BIOS-e820: 3fff - 3fff3000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 3fff3000 - 4000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: - 0001 (reserved) 127MB HIGHMEM available. 896MB LOWMEM available. found SMP MP-table at 000f5770 DMI 2.2 present. ACPI: RSDP (v000 VKT400) @ 0x000f7230 ACPI: RSDT (v001 VKT400 AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ 0x3fff3000 ACPI: FADT (v001 VKT400 AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ 0x3fff3040 ACPI: MADT (v001 VKT400 AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x) @ 0x3fff7240 ACPI: DSDT (v001 VKT400 AWRDACPI 0x1000 MSFT 0x010d) @ 0x ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x4008 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 6:10 APIC version 16 ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0]) IOAPIC[0]: Assigned apic_id 2 IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 3, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 dfl dfl) Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information Built 1 zonelists Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda1 ro consol=tty0 console=ttyS0,9600n8 Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 4096 (order 12: 32768 bytes) Detected 1533.578 MHz processor. Using pmtmr for high-res timesource Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Memory: 1031376k/1048512k available (1536k kernel code, 16232k reserved, 698k data, 148k init, 131008k highmem) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Calibrating delay loop... 3039.23 BogoMIPS Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line) Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+ stepping 00 Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. enabled ExtINT on CPU#0 ESR value before enabling vector: ESR value after enabling vector: ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs ..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=-1 Using local APIC timer interrupts. calibrating APIC timer ... . CPU clock speed is 1532.0868 MHz. . host bus clock speed is 266.0585 MHz. checking if image is initramfs...it isn't (ungzip failed); looks like an initrd Freeing initrd memory: 4484k freed NET: Registered protocol family 16 PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb3d0, last bus=1 PCI: Using configuration type 1 mtrr: v2.0 (20020519) ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326 ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (00:00) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 1 3 4 *5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 1 3 4 *5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKA] (IRQs 20) *0, disabled. ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKB] (IRQs 21) *0, disabled. ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKC] (IRQs 22) *0, disabled. ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [ALKD] (IRQs 23) *0, disabled. Linux Plug and Play Support v0.97 (c) Adam Belay PnPBIOS: Scanning system for PnP BIOS support... PnPBIOS: Found PnP BIOS installation structure at 0xc00fbeb0 PnPBIOS: PnP BIOS version 1.0, entry 0xf:0xbee0, dseg 0xf pnp: 00:0b: ioport range 0x3f0-0x3f1 has been reserved PnPBIOS: 18 nodes reported by PnP BIOS; 18 recorded by driver PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing ACPI: PCI
Bug#307816: cweb is not installable / unusable
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:07:47PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: The new dummy cweb package which now depends on tetex-bin has been sitting in unstable for almost a month but has not yet migrated. So I suggest letting: * tetex-bin_2.0.2-29 (and packages built from it: libkpathsea3 and libkpathsea-dev) * cweb_3.64.debian-2 into sarge. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#303860: celestia: ftbfs [sparc] no KDE libraries installed
configure: 28449: /usr/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: ${exec_prefix}/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/lib/kde/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/local/kde/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/kde/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/lib64/kde/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/lib64/kde3/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/X11R6/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/local/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /opt/kde3/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /opt/kde/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure: 28449: /usr/X11R6/kde/lib64/kde3/plugins/designer/kdewidgets.la
configure:28459: error:
in the prefix, you've chosen, are no KDE libraries installed. This will fail.
So, check this please and use another prefix!
Yeah, there's no good reason for celestia to be looking for lib64 on sparc
when building for sparc-unknown-linux-gnu as a target. Anyone care about
fixing this?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Pending upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307734 + fixed pending Bug#307734: jabber-irc: crashes when trying to register transport There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Pending upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 307734 + fixed pending Bug#307734: jabber-irc: crashes when trying to register transport Tags were: pending fixed Tags added: fixed, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307734: Pending upload
This bug is fixed in CVS. Changes are packaged and waiting for my sponsor to upload them and release team to approve new package. Meanwhile you can find updated version here: http://www.penza-gsm.ru/snake/xmpp/ -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307473: marked as done (Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1)
Your message dated Sat, 07 May 2005 00:17:09 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#307473: fixed in mysql-dfsg 4.0.24-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2005 11:39:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 03 04:39:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DSvk2-0001Im-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 04:39:06 -0700 Received: (qmail 15589 invoked from network); 3 May 2005 11:38:35 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 3 May 2005 11:38:35 - Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E7C51BBA63; Tue, 3 May 2005 12:59:49 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Purging mysql-server can kill mysql-server-4.1 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:59:49 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mysql-server, mysql-server-4.1 Version: 4.0.24-7 Severity: critical apt-get install mysql-server apt-get remove mysql-server apt-get install mysql-server-4.1 dpkg --purge mysql-server ***boom*** Depending on your answer to postrm_remove_databases, this has deleted all your data or only destroyed your MySQL installation. BTW1: The same can happen to mysql-server-4.1 if the user had removed but not purged mysql-server from woody some years ago and purges it now. BTW2: This is a nice example for the class of data loss bugs testing cannot catch because it might take some time until the first usre falls into this trap. --- Received: (at 307473-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 04:21:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 21:21:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUGoa-0007Gs-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 21:21:21 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DUGkX-0001we-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 00:17:09 -0400 From: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#307473: fixed in mysql-dfsg 4.0.24-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 00:17:09 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: mysql-dfsg Source-Version: 4.0.24-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mysql-dfsg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmysqlclient12-dev_4.0.24-8_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg/libmysqlclient12-dev_4.0.24-8_i386.deb libmysqlclient12_4.0.24-8_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg/libmysqlclient12_4.0.24-8_i386.deb mysql-client_4.0.24-8_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg/mysql-client_4.0.24-8_i386.deb mysql-common_4.0.24-8_all.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg/mysql-common_4.0.24-8_all.deb mysql-dfsg_4.0.24-8.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg/mysql-dfsg_4.0.24-8.diff.gz mysql-dfsg_4.0.24-8.dsc to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg/mysql-dfsg_4.0.24-8.dsc mysql-server_4.0.24-8_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg/mysql-server_4.0.24-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mysql-dfsg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request;
Bug#307990: libzlib-ruby: Segmentation fault
Package: libzlib-ruby Version: 0.6.0+ruby1.8.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable zlib of Ruby sometimes crashes with segmentation fault. Please see http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/4712. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (90, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-westwood Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP (charmap=EUC-JP) (ignored: LC_ALL set to ja_JP.eucJP) Versions of packages libzlib-ruby depends on: ii libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8] 1.8.2-5Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#292478: bug duplicated
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:40:37AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: i guess with the kernel-image-2.6.11 that problem disappears? Yes -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304933: openafs-krb5: FTBFS: asetkey.c:80: error: too few arguments to function `afsconf_AddKey'
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:11:09PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:38:18AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: I won't speak for Sam on that, but incidentally, I've tested that the following patch does indeed fix the compilation problem. It appears to be correct so far as I can tell, although I alas don't have a suitable environment for testing it completely. Since this was the exact same solution that Sam also proposed in the discussion about #196094 I've now uploaded an NMU with this patch. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#306141: NMU for krb4 uploaded
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I've uploaded an NMU for this issue. For -release: The patch can be found in the bug report http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/krb4.1_2_2-11_2.patch?bug=306141msg=21att=1 Please approve krb4 1.2.2-11.2 Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
