Bug#334295: slow syslogd makes system unusable
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:50:21PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote: I've seen this cause a boot take hours. The system looks like it's mostly idle, but everything which uses syslog is excruciatingly slow. It is possible that this is the same which is mentioned in bug 273269, as both systems I've seen this on run with -r and -l, but the explanation looks suspicious, as I believe the last time I saw it DNS was actually working. In that case, -l wasn't working, but reverse resolution was - every host was logged with the full reverse name instead of the short name. In another case, the slowdown kept openvpn from starting, and thus all actual log messages were from localhost. I'm pretty sure that 'critical' is not the right severity for this bug, since you are the first to report it. Either hardly anyone is using -r -l, and we should consider such a configuration contraindicated; or most people using -r -l are not experiencing such symptoms, and we should wonder what is special about your setup that's different from theirs. This problem could also be worked around by running two instances of syslogd -- one for local logging that's started as normal, and one for remote logging that is started later and is configured not to use /dev/log. /etc/init.d/sysklogd restart solved the problem in both situations. This is the most curious part of this bug report. If this is related to bug #273269, why should restarting the daemon have any effect? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#320577: FTBFS: missing build-deps
Hi Marcelo, Since you Andreas' patch looks good, do you plan to upload a fixed gtkglextmm soon? Although this bug does not affect the version of gtkglextmm in testing, the version that is in testing is also RC-buggy because it's built for the old C++ ABI and does not build-depend on g++-3.3; and this is one of the last few bugs holding the new apt out of testing. I will plan to remove gtkglextmm from testing if it's not fixed by the time the rest of the apt/sigc++-1.2 packages are ready to go. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: sverity downgrade
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 328608 important Bug#328608: xfce4-weather: It makes the xfce4-panel crashes on if you try to query your location Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected
forwarded 334292 lftp@uniyar.ac.ru tags 334292 + confirmed upstream severity 334292 normal merge 334059 334292 thanks Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Filippo Giunchedi: Hello, Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable consider this sample output [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lftp mysite Password: cd ok, cwd=/ lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/ cd www cd ok, cwd=/www lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/www put ~/tmp/subscribe.php 801 bytes transferred *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x10139df8 *** Aborted [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ note that the file got actually transferred successfully! Yes this is correct and already reported 3 times. Because the file is not corrupt the severity of grave is not correct. -- Noèl Köthe noel debian.org Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 334292 lftp@uniyar.ac.ru Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] tags 334292 + confirmed upstream Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, upstream severity 334292 normal Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected Severity set to `normal'. merge 334059 334292 Bug#334059: glibc detects double free or corruption (!prev) Bug#334292: lftp: illegal instruction/double free detected Bug#334074: lftp: segfault at the end of a get operation Bug#334141: Crashes after any transfer on Alpha Merged 334059 334074 334141 334292. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334319: ruby-v4l - FTBFS: missing build-dependency
Package: ruby-v4l Version: 0.1.2-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of ruby-v4l_0.1.2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), ruby1.8-dev [...] ruby1.8 extconf.rb make: ruby1.8: Command not found make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 ** Build finished at 20051016-1744 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] ruby-v4l lacks a build-depdendency against ruby1.8. Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334320: FTBFS on arm, hppa, ia-64 and sparc.
Package: bazaar
Version: 1.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on 4 architectures.
It failed to build from source on hppa, arm, ia64 and sparc; arm fails
thusly:
Test 73: archive_mirror url name
Test 73: FAILED: did not mirror to the local mirror
while sparc, ia64 and hppa fail:
=== TESTING: id-tagging-defaults ===
Test 1: id-tagging-defaults
Test 1: PASS
/build/buildd/bazaar-1.4.2/src/baz/tests/test-framework: line 28: 14481 Bus
error $DEBUGPREFIX ${builddir}/../baz/baz $@
Note that this did not affect 1.4.2-1, so it's apparently a problem with
one of the patches I backported, and presumably part of 1.5. The spread
of failures seems to indicate an alignment problem of some 32-bit type,
and Robert suggests it might be a gcc-4.0-specific issue.
Build logs at:
arm:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=bazaarver=1.4.2-2arch=armstamp=1129455989file=logas=raw
hppa:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=bazaarver=1.4.2-2arch=hppastamp=1129447337file=logas=raw
ia64:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=bazaarver=1.4.2-2arch=ia64stamp=1129451177file=logas=raw
sparc:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=bazaarver=1.4.2-2arch=sparcstamp=1129463246file=logas=raw
-rob
--
Yeaah, the hammer game! Kill it, kill it, make it dead, whack it!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#334322: bsdtar - FTBFS: missing buil-dep
Package: bsdtar Version: 1.02.034-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of bsdtar_1.02.034-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libarchive-doc, autotools-dev, bison [...] if s390-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs -MT bsdtar.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/bsdtar.Tpo -c -o bsdtar.o bsdtar.c; \ then mv -f .deps/bsdtar.Tpo .deps/bsdtar.Po; else rm -f .deps/bsdtar.Tpo; exit 1; fi In file included from bsdtar.c:27: bsdtar_platform.h:115:2: error: #error Configuration error: did not find libarchive. bsdtar.c:32:21: error: archive.h: No such file or directory bsdtar.c:33:27: error: archive_entry.h: No such file or directory In file included from bsdtar.c:64: bsdtar.h:105: warning: 'struct archive_entry' declared inside parameter list bsdtar.h:105: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want bsdtar.h:109: warning: 'struct archive_entry' declared inside parameter list bsdtar.c: In function 'main': bsdtar.c:236: error: 'ARCHIVE_EXTRACT_TIME' undeclared (first use in this function) bsdtar.c:236: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bsdtar.c:236: error: for each function it appears in.) bsdtar.c:240: error: 'ARCHIVE_EXTRACT_OWNER' undeclared (first use in this function) bsdtar.c:320: error: 'ARCHIVE_EXTRACT_NO_OVERWRITE' undeclared (first use in this function) bsdtar.c:411: error: 'ARCHIVE_EXTRACT_PERM' undeclared (first use in this function) bsdtar.c:412: error: 'ARCHIVE_EXTRACT_ACL' undeclared (first use in this function) bsdtar.c:413: error: 'ARCHIVE_EXTRACT_FFLAGS' undeclared (first use in this function) bsdtar.c:432: error: 'ARCHIVE_EXTRACT_UNLINK' undeclared (first use in this function) bsdtar.c: In function 'version': bsdtar.c:693: warning: implicit declaration of function 'archive_version' bsdtar.c:693: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument 2 has type 'int' bsdtar.c: In function 'long_help': bsdtar.c:761: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument 3 has type 'int' make[2]: *** [bsdtar.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/bsdtar-1.02.034' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/bsdtar-1.02.034' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051016-0056 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: closing fixed in NMU bugs, as i NMU'd myself :p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 333940 Bug#333940: Unsatisfiable build-dep on libsnmp5-dev 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] close 331303 Bug#331303: cacti-cactid: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Daniel Nylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 186882 1:1.18-2.1 Bug#186882: Crashes immediately on Alpha Bug marked as found in version 1:1.18-2.1. found 188448 1:0.7.0-1 Bug#188448: abuse-sdl: Nothing happens Bug marked as found in version 1:0.7.0-1. tags 213571 + patch Bug#213571: modutils: unaligned trap on alpha There were no tags set. Bug#260635: modutils: depmod has unaligned traps Tags added: patch merge 222770 223047 Bug#222770: prelink: Causes apt-build (perl) to segfault Bug#223047: Screws mozilla and konqueror on Alpha Bug#278659: prelink: makes some packages unusable Merged 222770 223047 278659. found 232727 6.4-4.1 Bug#232727: ghc6: ghci doesn't start on Alpha Bug marked as found in version 6.4-4.1. merge 200641 238786 Bug#200641: glibc gmtime() broken for 64bit time_t (in arch=alpha) Bug#238786: gmtime returns NULL for time_ts larger than 40 bits on Alpha Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #200641 has `glibc'; #238786 has `libc6' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325564: marked as done (soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:19 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325564 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 12:20:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 05:20:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E9ice-qT-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 05:20:20 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D0B1778E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:20:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B833583A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:20:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13193-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:20:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105) id E8DEA35B18; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:20:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58792130283; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:18:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:18:56 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: soya Version: 0.10.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid soya fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=soyaver=0.10.1-1arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=soya -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 325564-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 08:38:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 01:38:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from orfeo.duckcorp.org (mx.duckcorp.org) [62.4.21.229] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERQW9-0003hg-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 01:38:49 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.duckcorp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C852850008C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx.duckcorp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Orfeo [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13078-08 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Orfeo.duckcorp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.duckcorp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8F250009A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc =?utf-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#325564 Organization: DuckCorp X-URL: https://www.duckcorp.org/ X-GnuPG-Key: 0x90267086 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:19 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary==-=-=; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis at DuckCorp Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bug#334138: marked as done (FTBFS on arm due to $ in identifiers)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 01:47:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334138: fixed in dnprogs 2.31 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 19:28:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 12:28:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQri7-5x-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:28:51 -0700 Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1) id 1EQriK-00028x-Cm; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:29:04 +0200 Received: from p54a3e21b.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.226.27] helo=feynman.djpig.de) by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1) id 1EQrj8-0002Tt-J8; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:29:55 +0200 Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EQrhz-0002ys-P4; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:28:43 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS on arm due to $ in identifiers X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:28:43 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: dnprogs Version: 2.30 Severity: serious in mail/receive.c you use $ in macro names. This isn't allowed on arm by default anymore. See #327849 for details and a possible fix (aside from just not using $ in macro names...) Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 334138-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 08:48:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 01:48:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERQeC-0007SH-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 01:47:08 -0700 From: Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334138: fixed in dnprogs 2.31 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 01:47:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: dnprogs Source-Version: 2.31 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dnprogs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dnet-common_2.31_all.deb to pool/main/d/dnprogs/dnet-common_2.31_all.deb dnet-progs_2.31_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dnprogs/dnet-progs_2.31_i386.deb dnprogs_2.31.dsc to pool/main/d/dnprogs/dnprogs_2.31.dsc dnprogs_2.31.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dnprogs/dnprogs_2.31.tar.gz libdnet-dev_2.31_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dnprogs/libdnet-dev_2.31_i386.deb libdnet_2.31_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dnprogs/libdnet_2.31_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Patrick Caulfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dnprogs package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7
Processed: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-8 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 325551 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#325551: Two disjunct aleph projects cause filename clash in Debian There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 327129 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#327129: tetex-bin: missing links and formats There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 330278 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#330278: tetex-extra: Failed package install and missing dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 332114 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#332114: tetex-bin depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 332301 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#332301: a2ping depends in sam2p but tetex-bin does not require it Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 332397 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#332397: tetex-bin: manpage for a2ping missing There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 332840 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#332840: tetex-bin: FTBFS: quilt: command not found Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 333732 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#333732: tetex-bin: must (re)move obsolete 00tetex.cnf in preinst There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334055: zope2.7 security fix (bug 334055 )
hi I have (hopefully) fixed the bug 334055 that is a security alert. This is the proposed update for sarge : http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/zope/debian/sarge-security/zope2.7_2.7.5-2sec1_source.changes This is the proposed update for etch : http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/zope/debian/etch-security/zope2.7_2.7.5-3sec1_source.changes This is the patch that I applied : http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/zope/debian/sarge-security/zope-hotfix_2005-10-09-sarge.diff Note that my patch is much smaller than the original hotfix : http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/zope/debian/sarge-security/zope-hotfix_2005-10-09-upstream.diff which included also some new features such as nl and ca languages - - but usually we do not add new features in Debian when releasing security upgrades. Unfortunately all the above is source-only : I do not have here available a clean pure Sarge or Etch build environment. Can I upload a source-only in stable-security and testing-security ? I have made available a binary version: I compiled the etch source (and I am happily running it), it is available at http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/zope/debian/tmp/zope2.7_2.7.5-3sec1_i386.deb but it was compiled on my PC that is a mixture of sarge and etch, so it may miswork both in sarge and in etch :-( . I would also appreciate if someone who understands what 334055 is about would compile and test my fix to see if it works. a. -- Andrea Mennucc Ukn ow,Ifina llyfixe dmysp acebar.ohwh atthef signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332840: marked as done (tetex-bin: FTBFS: quilt: command not found)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:40 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-8 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 22:05:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 15:05:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.73] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOMop-0004z8-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 15:05:27 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 356363872F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 00:05:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101AE38715 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 00:05:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id D7B5626136; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:05:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 00:05:25 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tetex-bin: FTBFS: quilt: command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-7 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: dh_clean debian/rules build eperl -P -o debian/common.functions debian/common.functions.in mkdir ./stampdir || touch ./stampdir quilt push -a /bin/bash: quilt: command not found make: *** [patch-stamp] Error 127 You added a Build-Depends-Indep on quilt, but you're using it for the normal arch specific build too. Kurt --- Received: (at 332840-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 09:12:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 02:12:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.127.101] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERR2z-0003z2-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:12:46 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.166]) by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j9H9Cga3017468; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:42 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank) by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ERR2v-0003lP-Ui; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:42 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: teTeX maintainers debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-8 to experimental X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster's_message_of?= Mon, 17 Oct 2005 01:32:22 -0700) References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:12:40 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Version: 3.0-8 Frank K=FCster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tag 325551 + fixed-in-experimental tag 327129 + fixed-in-experimental tag 330278 + fixed-in-experimental tag 332114 + fixed-in-experimental tag 332301 + fixed-in-experimental tag 332397 + fixed-in-experimental tag 332840 + fixed-in-experimental tag 333732 + fixed-in-experimental quit This message was generated automatically in response to an upload to the experimental distribution. The .changes file follows.
Bug#334332: clamav: Broken package: fails to install due to unmet dependencies
Package: clamav Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt-get install clamav Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: clamav: Depends: libclamav1 (= 0.87) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329759: unfixed
reopen 329759 thanks Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to not fail if gconf2 is unavailable. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#334336: apache: FTBFS with openssl 0.9.8: EVP_F_EVP_DECRYPTFINAL undeclared
Package: apache Severity: serious Version: 1.3.33-8 From my build log: ... === src/modules/ssl gcc -c -I../../os/unix -I../../include -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DLINUX=22 -DTARGET=\apache\ -DHAVE_SET_DUMPABLE -DDB_DBM_HSEARCH=1 -DDEV_RANDOM=/dev/random -DUSE_HSREGEX -DAPACHE_SSL -O1 -g -Wall -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 `../../apaci` -fPIC -DSHARED_MODULE apache_ssl.c mv apache_ssl.o apache_ssl.lo apache_ssl.c: In function 'GetSessionFromServer': apache_ssl.c:1398: warning: passing argument 2 of 'd2i_SSL_SESSION' from incompatible pointer type apache_ssl.c: In function 'GetPrivateKey': apache_ssl.c:1490: error: 'EVP_F_EVP_DECRYPTFINAL' undeclared (first use in this function) apache_ssl.c:1490: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once apache_ssl.c:1490: error: for each function it appears in.) make[5]: *** [apache_ssl.lo] Error 1 make[4]: *** [all] Error 1 make[3]: *** [subdirs] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/apache-1.3.33/build-tree-apache-ssl/apache_1.3.33/src' make[2]: *** [build-std] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/apache-1.3.33/build-tree-apache-ssl/apache_1.3.33' make[1]: *** [build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/apache-1.3.33/build-tree-apache-ssl/apache_1.3.33' make: *** [debian/stampdir/build-stamp-ssl] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334338: rhapsody: Segmentation fault when join in a channel
Package: rhapsody Version: 0.26b-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, the first time I joined in a channel it worked fine but the users list showed only the ops of the channel. So I closed the program. Now when I just join in a channel the program is closed with a segmentation fault. What is happened? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages rhapsody depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand rhapsody recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334332: marked as done (clamav: Broken package: fails to install due to unmet dependencies)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:02:01 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334332: clamav: Broken package: fails to install due to unmet dependencies has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 09:25:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 02:25:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.netvoyager.co.uk (netvoyager.co.uk) [195.167.184.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERRF2-0006g7-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 02:25:12 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netvoyager.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C9CA7692; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from netvoyager.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eserver3 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01894-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:19 +0100 (BST) Received: by netvoyager.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 28B84A75DB; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:19 +0100 (BST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: clamav: Broken package: fails to install due to unmet dependencies X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:18 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: clamav Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt-get install clamav Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: clamav: Depends: libclamav1 (= 0.87) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 334332-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 10:02:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 03:02:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERRog-0003W2-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:02:03 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C797C7014; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:02:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:02:01 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#334332: clamav: Broken package: fails to install due to unmet dependencies Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:48:18AM +0100, Alex wrote: Package: clamav Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable apt-get install clamav Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or
Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?
Tommi Vainikainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does missing paperwork create a problem? Strictly speaking, yes. And what would be good license for Debians web pages? MIT/Expat or GNU GPL. Because copyright is currently claimed by SPI Inc, and SPI's board meeting is coming rather soon, I brought this issue to SPI's secretarys attention, but SPI board would appreciate some suggestion what they should decide about license change. I see it will be discussed at the board meeting at http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/agenda/2005-10-18.html Best wishes, -- MJ Ray (slef), Lynn, England, to email see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329759: unfixed
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote: Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to not fail if gconf2 is unavailable. Can you -vv your remark? You want the dh_gconf to be more robust? Policy seems to grant explicitely this usage: The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or postrm scripts require the package to be present in order to run. Note, however, that the postrm cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present during the purge phase. -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334034: kcheckgmail_0.5.4-1(hppa/unstable):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: kcheckgmail Version: 0.5.4-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Thank you, Lamont. Incorporating changes as soon as possible. Is there anything that upstream can do to help with this? i would forward the information and ensure that the fixes are there for the next version. J.L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in upload of nautilus-python 0.4.1-1 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 304019 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#304019: nautilus: crash when accesing Properties Tags were: confirmed Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 309653 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#309653: nautilus: Icons for an open folder don't revert to closed form when the folder is closed There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 314297 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#314297: New Upstream (0.4.0) available for python-nautilus There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 323743 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#323743: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libnautilus2-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334344: r-cran-gtkdevice causes R to segfault on window destruction
Package:r-cran-gtkdevice Version:1.9.3-1 Severity: grave To reproduce: start R, library(gtkDevice), gtk(), then click the X on the window that pops up. Package versions: r-base 2.1.1-1; libgtk1.2: 1.2.10-17; any questions, please ask! Cheers David
Bug#331627: marked as done (python-visual: not installable in sid)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:17 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331627: fixed in python-visual 3.2.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 08:54:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 01:54:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMiZ0-0002Db-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:54:18 -0700 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5EE3067D2; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFA22C80F7; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:53:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16533-10; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:53:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id BE3C62C811C; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:53:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:53:42 +0200 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python-visual: not installable in sid X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:53:42 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: python-visual Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install python-visual Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: python-visual: Depends: libboost-python1.32.0 but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 331627-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 11:08:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 04:08:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERSkz-0007WV-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:17 -0700 From: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331627: fixed in python-visual 3.2.1-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:17 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: python-visual Source-Version: 3.2.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of python-visual, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: python-visual_3.2.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/p/python-visual/python-visual_3.2.1-3.diff.gz python-visual_3.2.1-3.dsc to pool/main/p/python-visual/python-visual_3.2.1-3.dsc python-visual_3.2.1-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/p/python-visual/python-visual_3.2.1-3_powerpc.deb A summary
Bug#333941: marked as done (Unsatisfiable build-dep on libsnmp5-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:17:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#333941: fixed in mbrowse 0.3.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 15:29:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 08:29:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmx018.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.117] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQRUk-0003YJ-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:29:18 -0700 Received: from outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j9EFTGh3003157 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:16 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (157.187-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.187.157]) by outmx018.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j9EFTACe003091 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:29:10 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:27:36 +0200 From: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051010) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unsatisfiable build-dep on libsnmp5-dev X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: mbrowse Severity: serious Version: 0.3.1-5 Hi Please update your build dependency on libsnmp5-dev to libsnmp9-dev | libsnmp-dev Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDT85o5UTeB5t8Mo0RAt/TAJ9dEzgtZCLv9TKNUdw+EtpP/xU+1wCgj3ed 1LzZLJ1PSw3TgsF6mHOKhMQ= =IFkw -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 333941-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 11:17:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 04:17:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERSzO-000416-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:17:10 -0700 From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#333941: fixed in mbrowse 0.3.1-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:17:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: mbrowse Source-Version: 0.3.1-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mbrowse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mbrowse_0.3.1-6.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mbrowse/mbrowse_0.3.1-6.diff.gz mbrowse_0.3.1-6.dsc to pool/main/m/mbrowse/mbrowse_0.3.1-6.dsc mbrowse_0.3.1-6_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mbrowse/mbrowse_0.3.1-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mbrowse package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:47:01 +0200 Source: mbrowse Binary: mbrowse Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3.1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Noèl Köthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: mbrowse- a SNMP MIB browser
Bug#333633: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#333633: fixed in gdis 0.86-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 01:08:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 12 18:08:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EPrZg-0001rI-00; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:08:00 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9D17xla017246 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:07:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EPp0n-0001Bb-QO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:23:49 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:23:49 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1131/Wed Oct 12 13:35:32 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Disposition: inline --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gdis Version: 0.86-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch gdis fails to build because it has an unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev: - Considering xlibmesa-dev - Trying xlibmesa-dev - Cannot install xlibmesa-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Package xlibmesa-dev is not available, but is referred to by another pack= age. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: xlibmesa-gl-dev libglu1-xorg-dev E: Package xlibmesa-dev has no installation candidate E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed. The attached patch replaces this build-dependency with one upon xlibmesa-gl-dev | libglu1-xorg-dev, which fixes this problem. --=20 Matt --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff -u gdis-0.86/debian/control gdis-0.86/debian/control --- gdis-0.86/debian/control +++ gdis-0.86/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: science Priority: optional Maintainer: No=C3=A8l K=C3=B6the [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libgtk1.2-dev, gtkglarea5-dev, libgtk= extra-dev, xlibmesa-dev, glutg3-dev, libgtkglext1-dev, libxmu-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libgtk1.2-dev, gtkglarea5-dev, libgtk= extra-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libglu1-xorg-dev, glutg3-dev, libgtkglext1-dev= , libxmu-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 =20 Package: gdis --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDTYz1fNdgYxVXvBARAvoMAJ4z23Rhly2i/5nnDV2q7iF6CbQWRACffHOr 8YVlgIP9ZXEeVaSuTysC/KQ= =WbQr -END PGP SIGNATURE- --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/-- --- Received: (at 333633-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 11:09:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 04:09:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERSkw-0007U9-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:14 -0700 From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#333633: fixed in gdis 0.86-2
Bug#332850: marked as done (deskbar-applet needs python 2.4 but depends on python 2.3)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:02:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332850: fixed in deskbar-applet 0.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 22:20:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 15:20:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mxout02.versatel.de [212.7.152.119] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EON2u-0007Pq-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 15:20:00 -0700 Received: from mx02.versatel.de (mx02.versatel.de [212.7.146.2]) by mxout02.versatel.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j98MJwj7008219; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 00:19:58 +0200 Received: from nostromo.homeunix.org (i5387C127.versanet.de [83.135.193.39]) by mx02.versatel.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j98MJv4S028948; Sun, 9 Oct 2005 00:19:57 +0200 Received: from bjoern by nostromo.homeunix.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EON2r-0004EL-3c; Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:19:57 +0200 Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 00:19:57 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJu?= Heide [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: deskbar-applet needs python 2.4 but depends on python 2.3 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mxout02.versatel.de id j98MJwj7008219 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: deskbar-applet Version: 0.5.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, when I try to start deskbar-applet the normal way (right-click on the panel, add-to-panel) nothing happens. Then I tried to start deskbar-applet the unusual way and got this: Script wurde gestartet: Sa 08 Okt 2005 23:55:43 CEST [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/deskbar-applet --window Running installed deskbar, using normal PYTHONPATH Data Dir: /usr/share/deskbar-applet Starting .desktop file indexation [snip] Done ! Starting ephy bookmarks indexation Done ! Starting .gtkbookmarks file indexation Done ! Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/deskbar-applet, line 84, in ? build_window() File /usr/lib/deskbar-applet, line 45, in build_window applet_factory(applet, None) File /usr/lib/deskbar-applet, line 34, in applet_factory deskbar.applet.DeskbarApplet(applet) File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/deskbar/applet.py, line 9, in _= _init__ self.entry =3D deskbar.deskbarentry.DeskbarEntry() File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/deskbar/deskbarentry.py, line 5= 4, in __init__ self._handlers =3D self._load_handlers() File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/deskbar/deskbarentry.py, line 9= 4, in _load_handlers return [ File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/deskbar/handlers/mozilla.py, li= ne 28, in __init__ parser =3D MozillaBookmarksParser(self) File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/deskbar/handlers/mozilla.py, li= ne 58, in __init__ self.bookmarks =3D set() NameError: global name 'set' is not defined I found a patch here:=20 http://raphael.slinckx.net/blog/index.php/2005-10-02/deskbar-applet-hotne= ss#comment-191 but then: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/deskbar-applet --window Running installed deskbar, using normal PYTHONPATH Data Dir: /usr/share/deskbar-applet Starting .desktop file indexation [snip] Done ! Starting ephy bookmarks indexation Done ! Starting .gtkbookmarks file indexation Done ! Starting mozilla/ff bookmarks indexation Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/deskbar-applet, line 84, in ? build_window() File /usr/lib/deskbar-applet, line 45, in build_window applet_factory(applet, None) File /usr/lib/deskbar-applet, line 34, in applet_factory deskbar.applet.DeskbarApplet(applet) File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/deskbar/applet.py, line 9, in _= _init__ self.entry =3D deskbar.deskbarentry.DeskbarEntry() File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/deskbar/deskbarentry.py, line 5= 4, in __init__ self._handlers =3D self._load_handlers() File
Bug#334346: please remove zlib packages from ia32-libs for amd64
Package: ia32-libs Version: 1.4 Severity: serious Unpacking lib32z1 (from .../lib32z1_1%3a1.2.3-4_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lib32z1_1%3a1.2.3-4_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libz.so.1', which is also in package ia32-libs Selecting previously deselected package lib32z1-dev. please remove the zlib packages from ia32-libs for amd64 and depend on lib32z1 / lib32z1-dev instead. An update to recent glibc packages would be appreciated as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install
tags 317882 - moreinfo tags 317882 - unreproducible thanks install xorg-driver-fglrx (but I cannot find this package in Ubuntu), then ia32-libs to reproduce the installation failure. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: ia32-libs: package fails to install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 317882 - moreinfo Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible Tags removed: moreinfo tags 317882 - unreproducible Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334344: marked as forwarded (r-cran-gtkdevice causes R to segfault on window destruction)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 06:52:39 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #334344, regarding r-cran-gtkdevice causes R to segfault on window destruction to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) Martyn Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED], Duncan Temple Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Received: (at 334344-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 11:53:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 04:53:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) [216.148.227.118] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERTYG-00031y-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:53:12 -0700 Received: from basebud.nulle.part (c-67-174-11-185.hsd1.il.comcast.net[67.174.11.185]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id 2005101711524101500rd2lhe; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:52:42 + Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ERTXj-0007EA-JA; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 06:52:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 06:52:39 -0500 To: Martyn Plummer [EMAIL PROTECTED], Duncan Temple Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: David Hugh-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#334344: r-cran-gtkdevice causes R to segfault on window destruction In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Martyn, Duncan, On 17 October 2005 at 12:14, David Hugh-Jones wrote: | Package:r-cran-gtkdevice | Version:1.9.3-1 | Severity: grave | | To reproduce: start R, library(gtkDevice), gtk(), then click the X | on the window that pops up. Here is a fresh bug report that I can reproduce also with R 2.2.0. I'll try to see this eve if a simple rebuild cures it. I'll follow up with the results. Your comments would be appreciated. Regards, Dirk | Package versions: r-base 2.1.1-1; libgtk1.2: 1.2.10-17; any | questions, please ask! | | Cheers | David -- Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334350: flexbackup default config insecure temporary file creation
Package: flexbackup Severity: grave Tags: security ZATAZ Audits has published an advisory concerning flexbackup. Based on a cursory investigation of the source package, Debian is affected as well. From: ZATAZ Audits [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-disclosure] flexbackup default config insecure temporary file creation Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:06:06 +0200 Organization: ZATAZ Audits Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # flexbackup default config insecure temporary file creation Vendor: http://flexbackup.sourceforge.net/ Advisory: http://www.zataz.net/adviso/flexbackup-09192005.txt Vendor informed: yes Exploit available: yes Impact : low Exploitation : low # The vulnerabilities ared due to insecure temporary files creations due to a default config. [...] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#259615: marked as done (pspp: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line new release has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2004 18:50:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 15 11:50:43 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c204015.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.204.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BlBJb-00017k-00; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:50:43 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BlBJZ-00013c-HP; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:50:41 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pspp: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:50:41 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: pspp Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'pspp' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error: q2c.c: In function `dump_declarations': q2c.c:1038: warning: zero-length printf format string q2c.c:1067: warning: zero-length printf format string q2c.c:1084: warning: zero-length printf format string q2c.c:1139: error: label at end of compound statement With the attached patch 'pspp' can be compiled using gcc-3.4. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/pspp-0.3.0/src/q2c.c ./src/q2c.c --- ../tmp-orig/pspp-0.3.0/src/q2c.c2000-01-08 01:52:09.0 +0100 +++ ./src/q2c.c 2004-07-15 20:43:34.946676068 +0200 @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ break; default: - /* nothing */ + break; /* nothing */ } } --- Received: (at 259615-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:11:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:11:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.198.43] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERTpX-0004gs-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:11:03 -0700 Received: from vanzandt.comcast.net (c-24-61-94-90.hsd1.nh.comcast.net[24.61.94.90](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id 2005101712103101400l9lqbe; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:10:31 + Received: from jrv by vanzandt.comcast.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ERTok-0006Ml-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new release Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 These were fixed in 0.4.0-1 - don't know why the bug system didn't see the changelog entry. pspp (0.4.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * build against libplot2c2 -- James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:43:59 -0400 pspp (0.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=low * added libgsl0-dev to Build-Depends -- James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 24 Sep 2005 21:38:10 -0400 pspp (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (fixes: Bug#259615,Bug#328545) * debian/control: update Debian policy version (no changes needed), update program description, add libplot-dev to Build-Depends, bump debhelper version to 4.0 * debian/watch: update format to version 3 * debian/rules: eliminate support for debian-test, install pspp-mode.el, revert to Makefile commands to build .html documentation. Build and install .pdf documentation. Register .html and .pdf files with doc-base. Eliminate deprecated DH_COMPAT setting. * debian/README: eliminate outdated material, add pointers on documentation and the Emacs mode. -- James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:45:36 -0400 - Jim Van Zandt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328545: marked as done (very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned?)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line new release has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 23:26:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 16:26:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EG386-0003DA-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:26:58 -0700 Received: from nahar.localdomain (p83.129.19.128.tisdip.tiscali.de [83.129.19.128]) by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D9E335A3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:26:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=nahar.localdomain) by nahar.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EG37x-0006AS-5G for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:26:49 +0200 From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: very old package with RC bugs, should this be orphaned? Organization: CPU+Mainboard-FAQ: http://www.dch-faq.de/ Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:26:48 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pspp Version: 0.3.0-8 Severity: serious Hi, During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we begun to go through the list of the oldest packages in Debian that are not in testing (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/oldest.html) to search for packages that should be either orphaned or removed completly from Debian (unstable and testing) since they have been obviously neglected by their maintainer. Your package did show up on this list and we propose to orphan it. There are not very many users, the last upload was two years ago and it's rc-buggy. This usually means that your package matched some of the following criteria: [1] Your packages has not had an upload for more than two years [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**) [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you might be MIA [4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than 100 users with the package installed. [5] the package was not released with sarge and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true. (**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed more than one month before the time the check was performed. After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it). The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to proceed. Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel responsible for their packages without needing other people to force them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users. Thanks! Marc --- Received: (at 328545-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:11:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:11:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.198.43] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERTpX-0004gs-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:11:03 -0700 Received: from vanzandt.comcast.net (c-24-61-94-90.hsd1.nh.comcast.net[24.61.94.90](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id 2005101712103101400l9lqbe; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:10:31 + Received: from jrv by vanzandt.comcast.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ERTok-0006Ml-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: new release Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:10:14 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors
Package: netplan Version: 1.9-3 Severity: grave With the new upgrade, the netplan daemon ate up all the memory on the system and caused the xserver and its associated tty to fail. This required a reboot. Going to plan B, I tried apt-get source and compiling my own. It now yields this error message when I tried to start the daemon: Starting plan appointment daemon: netplan/usr/sbin/netplan: fatal error: no memory, exiting. Is there a work-around for this? I've really come to depend on this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10.050423 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages netplan depends on: ii adduser 3.67.2 Add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an netplan recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Dan Griswold Rochester, NY -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334352: krb4: FTBFS with openssl 0.9.8: Syntax errors in headers
Package: krb4
Severity: serious
Version: 1.2.2-11.3
From my build log:
...
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I../../lib/roken
-I../../lib/roken -DROKEN_RENAME -I/usr/include/et -I/usr/include/et -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations
-Wnested-externs -g -O2 -c check_time.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/check_time.o
In file included from ./krb.h:53,
from krb_locl.h:126,
from check_time.c:34:
../../include/des.h:224: error: syntax error before '(' token
../../include/des.h:224: error: syntax error before 'int'
In file included from ./krb.h:358,
from krb_locl.h:126,
from check_time.c:34:
./krb-protos.h:175: warning: 'struct _ossl_old_des_ks_struct' declared inside
parameter list
./krb-protos.h:175: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration,
which is probably not what you want
./krb-protos.h:456: warning: 'struct _ossl_old_des_ks_struct' declared inside
parameter list
./krb-protos.h:540: warning: 'struct _ossl_old_des_ks_struct' declared inside
parameter list
./krb-protos.h:576: warning: 'struct _ossl_old_des_ks_struct' declared inside
parameter list
./krb-protos.h:590: warning: 'struct _ossl_old_des_ks_struct' declared inside
parameter list
make[3]: *** [check_time.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/krb4-1.2.2/build-tree/krb4-1.2.2/lib/krb'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/krb4-1.2.2/build-tree/krb4-1.2.2/lib'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/krb4-1.2.2/build-tree/krb4-1.2.2'
make: *** [stampdir/build-stamp] Error 2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313316: mozilla-js-debugger: menu option doesn't do anything at all.
severity 313316 important
tags 313316 + unreproducible
thanks
On dim, jun 12, 2005, Nick Lewycky wrote:
I go to Tools - Web Development - JavaScript Debugger ... and
nothing happens. Nothing at all. The JavaScript Console shows no
errors, and neither does the text console Mozilla is run from. I don't
know how long ago it broke, but it used to work.
Do you still have this problem with version 2:1.7.12?
What happens if you type if (true) { print('hello'); } enter?
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293962: mozilla-calendar: crashes still
On jeu, aoû 04, 2005, Teemu Ikonen wrote: This package has been unusable for its purpose in certain architectures for over six months now (including the versions in unstable). Is this a regression over version 2:1.7.8-1sarge2 in testing? If yes, please provide a backtrace of the crash as explained at: http://wiki.debian.org/?HowToGetABacktrace Thanks, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321243: mozilla-browser: mozilla does not startup, but still exsist as a process
severity 321243 important tags 321243 + unreproducible thanks Hi, On jeu, aoû 04, 2005, Torsten Zirzlaff wrote: The browser does not start up, but still exsist as a process. It gives the following warning: Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_property_get(): length value has wrapped in calculation (did you pass G_MAXLONG?) If I make warnings fatal it will exit otherwise it has to killed with kill. Do you still have this bug with version 2:1.7.12? (I know the warning is still present, but the browser should start.) Thanks, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors
[Dan Griswold] With the new upgrade, the netplan daemon ate up all the memory on the system and caused the xserver and its associated tty to fail. This required a reboot. Hm. I'm not aware of any changes which could give this result. What was the version number you used before this problem arrived? Is there a work-around for this? I've really come to depend on this package. You can perhaps try to version in sarge or etch? I'm not aware of any workarounds. Can you try to run the program using strace and valgrind, to see what is going on? And perhaps run it under gdb to try to get a backtrace? I have no idea what can have caused this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: mozilla-js-debugger: menu option doesn't do anything at all.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 313316 important Bug#313316: mozilla-js-debugger: menu option doesn't do anything at all. Severity set to `important'. tags 313316 + unreproducible Bug#313316: mozilla-js-debugger: menu option doesn't do anything at all. There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: mozilla-browser: mozilla does not startup, but still exsist as a process
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 321243 important Bug#321243: mozilla-browser: mozilla does not startup, but still exsist as a process Severity set to `important'. tags 321243 + unreproducible Bug#321243: mozilla-browser: mozilla does not startup, but still exsist as a process There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321644: 321644 not fixed with 1.7.12-1
severity 321644 important tags 321644 + unreproducible thanks Hi, On Wed, Oct 12, 2005, Ian Campbell wrote: I've just tested 1.7.12-1 on my amd64 system and it still crashes in the same way 1.7.10 did. The patch in this bug still fixes the problem for me. Did you install the other 2:1.7.12 packages as well? Other people have confirmed the fix with 1.7.12. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323200: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module
severity 323200 important tags 323200 + unreproducible thanks Hi, On lun, aoû 15, 2005, Luke Schierer wrote: according to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311035#c7, which a bug I submitted was marked duplicate of, gcc4 generates bad code in the libimglib2.so module, and this is a known bug, posted upstream (mozilla) at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293307 On ven, sep 23, 2005, Larry McCarthy wrote: I'm pretty sure this is the same bug as the OP report. Here's how to reproduce with sid's Moz 1.7.11-1 browser: 1. Go to: http://www.boincstats.com/stats/user_graph.php?pr=sahid=3338942 I can't reproduce this with version 2:1.7.12, can you confirm we can close this bug? Cheers, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 323200 important Bug#323200: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module Severity set to `important'. tags 323200 + unreproducible Bug#323200: mozilla-browser: gcc4 problem in the libimglib2.so module Tags were: patch Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: confirming 327550
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 327550 + confirmed Bug#327550: [CAN-2005-2414] Race condition in the XPCOM library Tags were: security Tags added: confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: 321644 not fixed with 1.7.12-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 321644 important Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: mozilla 1.7.10 version crashes almost immediately and all other browsers that use the mozilla core crash with similar frequency Severity set to `important'. tags 321644 + unreproducible Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: mozilla 1.7.10 version crashes almost immediately and all other browsers that use the mozilla core crash with similar frequency Tags were: patch Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325563: marked as done (pyopenal_0.1.5-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2005 12:20:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 29 05:20:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E9icd-pU-00; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 05:20:19 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531541778E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:20:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2323583A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:20:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13195-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:20:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105) id C3BC0359C9; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:20:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF0BD130283; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:18:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:18:03 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pyopenal_0.1.5-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pyopenal Version: 0.1.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid pyopenal fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=pyopenalver=0.1.5-1arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=pyopenal -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 325563-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326904: marked as done (pyflac_0.0.4-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 14:15:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 07:15:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ECeEO-0004dI-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:15:24 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19241778E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:15:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F5235B2E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:15:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02820-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:15:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105) id 3DBA93612A; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:15:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 475241303B6; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:11:03 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:11:03 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pyflac_0.0.4-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pyflac Version: 0.0.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid pyflac fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=pyflacver=0.0.4-1arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=pyflac -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 326904-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323387: marked as done (umfpack_4.4-3(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 12:20:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 05:20:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E50QS-0005mH-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:20:16 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1441778E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DC235B18 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10426-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105) id 6128935894; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B48851308A8; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:16:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:16:30 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: umfpack_4.4-3(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: umfpack Version: 4.4-3 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid umfpack fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=umfpackver=4.4-3arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=umfpack -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 323387-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329089: marked as done (uqwk_2.21-11(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 13:43:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 19 06:43:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHLvf-0002np-00; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:43:31 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3321778E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:43:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91AC35894 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:43:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22735-05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:43:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id C8CE235835; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:43:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9F92A13027E; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:43:09 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:43:09 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: uqwk_2.21-11(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: uqwk Version: 2.21-11 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid uqwk fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization (-O2 usually works) or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=uqwkver=2.21-11arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=uqwk -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 329089-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328457: marked as done (smart_0.39-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 12:26:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 05:26:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFsol-0003UO-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 05:26:19 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B381778F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:26:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D8F358F4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:26:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14757-08 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:26:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id 057D435894; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:26:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E0D61303DE; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:26:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:26:01 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: smart_0.39-1(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: smart Version: 0.39-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid smart fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=smartver=0.39-1arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=smart -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 328457-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL
Bug#327112: marked as done (xjdic_24-6(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 17:40:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 07 10:40:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ED3uN-000217-00; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 10:40:27 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2951778F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:40:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A3D35894 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:40:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23076-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:40:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105) id DB48E35835; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:40:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20E481303B6; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:35:15 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:35:14 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xjdic_24-6(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xjdic Version: 24-6 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid xjdic fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=xjdicver=24-6arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=xjdic -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 327112-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL
Bug#328452: marked as done (pyid3lib_0.5.1-6(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 12:20:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 05:20:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFsjB-0001gl-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 05:20:33 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFB41778F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:20:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D64F358F4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:20:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14748-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:20:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id C387B35894; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:20:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA9BC130365; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:20:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:20:18 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pyid3lib_0.5.1-6(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pyid3lib Version: 0.5.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid pyid3lib fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=pyid3libver=0.5.1-6arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=pyid3lib -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 328452-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323389: marked as done (python-extclass_1.2.0zope-2.5.1-4(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 12:20:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 05:20:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E50QX-0005nH-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 05:20:22 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3AD1778E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE293583A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10426-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 105) id 9931E359C9; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:20:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B72E31308A8; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:17:23 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:17:23 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python-extclass_1.2.0zope-2.5.1-4(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: python-extclass Version: 1.2.0zope-2.5.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid python-extclass fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=python-extclassver=1.2.0zope-2.5.1-4arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=python-extclass -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 323389-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bug#328456: marked as done (pngwriter_0.5.2-4(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 12:24:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 05:24:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adsl-78-168-20.hsv.bellsouth.net (hades.marenka.net) [216.78.168.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFsmn-0002ro-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 05:24:17 -0700 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E621778F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:24:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AD3358F4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:24:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14757-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:24:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E742A35894; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:24:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 742301303DE; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:24:00 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:24:00 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pngwriter_0.5.2-4(m68k/unstable/zeus): FTBFS on m68k Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at marenka.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pngwriter Version: 0.5.2-4 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid pngwriter fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with less optimization or gcc-3.3/gcc-3.4. A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=pngwriterver=0.5.2-4arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=pngwriter -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 328456-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 12:48:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 05:48:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.67] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERUPn-0005jS-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:48:31 -0700 Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([65.4.7.113]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades.marenka.net ([65.4.7.113]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:48:00 -0400 Received: from hades2.marenka.net (hades2.marenka.net [10.0.0.2]) by hades.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751231771D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:48:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (hades2.marenka.net [127.0.0.1]) by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA943594D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hades2.marenka.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hades2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04579-05; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: by hades2.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 10) id E4E4B358F4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: by loki.marenka.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C9AD1306AF; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:47:45 -0500 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [Dan Griswold] With the new upgrade, the netplan daemon ate up all the memory on the system and caused the xserver and its associated tty to fail. This required a reboot. Hm. I'm not aware of any changes which could give this result. What was the version number you used before this problem arrived? That's what I thought when I looked in the changelog. I upgrade very frequently, so my replaced version must be the immediately previous one, 1.9-2. Can you try to run the program using strace and valgrind, to see what is going on? And perhaps run it under gdb to try to get a backtrace? strace doesn't appear to report much of value (although I could be mistaken). valgrind reports the following in its summary: ==23228== ERROR SUMMARY: 32 errors from 18 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ==23228== malloc/free: in use at exit: 688 bytes in 20 blocks. ==23228== malloc/free: 91 allocs, 70 frees, 11206 bytes allocated. ==23228== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v ==23228== searching for pointers to 20 not-freed blocks. ==23228== checked 78356 bytes. ==23228== ==23228== LEAK SUMMARY: ==23228==definitely lost: 156 bytes in 11 blocks. ==23228== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==23228==still reachable: 532 bytes in 9 blocks. ==23228== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==23228== Use --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory. ==23049== ==23049== ERROR SUMMARY: 32 errors from 18 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ==23049== malloc/free: in use at exit: 156 bytes in 11 blocks. ==23049== malloc/free: 73 allocs, 62 frees, 7858 bytes allocated. ==23049== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v ==23049== searching for pointers to 11 not-freed blocks. ==23049== checked 69632 bytes. ==23049== ==23049== LEAK SUMMARY: ==23049==definitely lost: 156 bytes in 11 blocks. ==23049== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==23049==still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==23049== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==23049== Use --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory. Several of the errors reported above that summary are Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) I don't know what I'm doing with gdb, so I'll hold off until instructed further. Thank you so much for your help. Dan Griswold Rochester, NY -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334367: php4-curl: php4 FTBFS due to libcurl3-dev disappearing from unstable
Package: php4-curl Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source libcurl3-dev disappeared from unstable on or about October 10th (based on the upload date in the changelog) and the last PHP4 upload got caught in the transition. Some architectures' autobuilders could still get ahold of libcurl3-dev, and some couldn't: [1] arm hppa sparc (Other build-failures) m68k== Died on unixodbc-dev being uninstallable ia64== Died on _both_ unixodbc-dev and libcurl3-dev, unlucky! powerpc == Somehow died on libcrypto... [1] http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?email=packages=php4arches= (Sorry, I couldn't work out how to make reportbug submit against a source package...) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (950, 'unstable'), (900, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- Paul TBBle Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office. pgpNsN0HLaq9K.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#334371: rdesktop: whole desktop freezes
Package: rdesktop Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable after invoking rdesktop with parameters -u, -d, -p, -g, -B, -z, -a, -x my desktop freezes (kde). this also happended when invoking rdesktop with 'krdc'. this bug was introduces in the last 10 days or so, because i already used it before on this system. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-10-1 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages rdesktop depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-5 SSL shared libraries ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m rdesktop recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331483: xmms-oggre_0.3-1(mipsel/unstable): configure built with outdatad libtool.m4
Re: Ryan Murray in [EMAIL PROTECTED] The correct 'configure' script will have output that looks like this: linux*) lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all ;; Hi, I've just compiled xmms-oggre with a modified configure script that uses the above mentioned paragraph. It throws no further libtool warnings on mipsel. (Re-autoconfing with autoconf 2.59 and 2.50 was unsuccessful and broke the dependencies on the ogg encoder.) Since my auto* knowledge is not that firm, I'm reluctant to upload without further checking. (I can't really run the package/xmms on mipsel remotely.) Is that fix (workaround/hack/...) ok? Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/cs/ Universität des Saarlandes, Compiler Design Lab signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#333941: acknowledged by developer (Bug#333941: fixed in mbrowse 0.3.1-6)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * corrected snmp build-dep, Salut Luk Hi Noèl ;-) I suppose it was a quick and easy fix :-) Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDU7bZ5UTeB5t8Mo0RAlmeAJ9rnT2xYqj4GWe8eSStSM2bJQJsjwCgiOm6 LweTgC4Pv3h1wTaGZ3K4YI0= =Cv4i -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#333079: rcconf: rcconf 1.14 does not work
Can't locate stddef.ph in @INC (did you run h2ph?) (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/bits/types.ph line 10. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/termios.ph line 9. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/bits/ioctl-types.ph line 8. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/sys/ioctl.ph line 9. Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/rcconf line 115. Use of uninitialized value in unlink at /usr/bin/rcconf line 1006. Use of uninitialized value in -f at /usr/bin/rcconf line 160. I dont' know if it is due to rcconf or a misconfiguration of my system (perl?). In my environment, above error doesn't occur. I think this problem is caused by perl package. Could you try update perl package? ii perl 5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report ii perl-modules 5.8.7-6Core Perl modules -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334374: python2.4-psyco: raises ImportError: undefined symbol PyFPE_jbuf (version mismatch?)
Package: python2.4-psyco Version: 1.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable python2.4-psyco fail to import, here's a transcript: $ python2.4 -c 'import psyco' Traceback (most recent call last): File string, line 1, in ? File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/psyco/__init__.py, line 45, in ? raise ImportError, str(e) + extramsg ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/psyco/_psyco.so: undefined symbol: PyFPE_jbuf (check that the compiled extension '/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/psyco/_psyco.so' is for the correct Python version; this is Python 2.4.2) $ I wouldn't know how to check for version mismatches between _psyco.so and python, but I don't think the error is caused by bad runtime config ^_^ (IOW, I guess that it's a miscompile). Another user has had the same error message appear. Depending on how the program using psyco handles ImportErrors, they may or may not crash. But at least psyco itsealf is unusable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages python2.4-psyco depends on: ii python2.4 2.4.2-1An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages python2.4-psyco recommends: ii python-psyco-doc 1.4-2 python specializing compiler docum -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315069: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDU7545UTeB5t8Mo0RAuu2AJ4tEbcch9u5C44EziHQj1G3fEPvNwCgvyac YVLqFswUofwlqebb5Ymo4Ak= =VrTE -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff -u gauche-0.8.4/debian/changelog gauche-0.8.4/debian/changelog --- gauche-0.8.4/debian/changelog +++ gauche-0.8.4/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gauche (0.8.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix gcc-4.0 compile errors (Closes: #315069) + + -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:35:28 +0200 + gauche (0.8.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. diff -u gauche-0.8.4/debian/rules gauche-0.8.4/debian/rules --- gauche-0.8.4/debian/rules +++ gauche-0.8.4/debian/rules @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ rm -rf build-tree tar -xzvf Gauche-0.8.4.tgz mv Gauche-0.8.4 build-tree + sed s/^ SCM_OBJ(/ (/ -i build-tree/src/*.c cd build-tree; autoconf cd build-tree/gc; rm -f libtool.m4; aclocal-1.7; \ libtoolize --force --copy; automake-1.7 -a; autoconf
Bug#333079: rcconf: rcconf 1.14 does not work
Wrong email address?On 17 Oct 2005 23:54:46 +0900, Atsushi KAMOSHIDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can't locate stddef.ph in @INC (did you run h2ph?) (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/bits/types.ph line 10. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/termios.ph line 9. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/bits/ioctl- types.ph line 8. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/sys/ioctl.ph line 9. Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/rcconf line 115. Use of uninitialized value in unlink at /usr/bin/rcconf line 1006. Use of uninitialized value in -f at /usr/bin/rcconf line 160. I dont' know if it is due to rcconf or a misconfiguration of my system (perl?).In my environment, above error doesn't occur. I think this problem is caused by perl package.Could you try update perl package? iiperl 5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report iiperl-modules 5.8.7-6Core Perl modules-- David
Bug#334228: reopen
reopen 334228 thanks As discussed on IRC, -mtune didn't do it. I've tested and can confirm that the following cflags (suggested by Aurelien) work: -pipe -O -march= -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 334228 Bug#334228: renders network unusable Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333510: marked as done ([FTBFS] perl fails on arm with -O2)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#333510: fixed in perl 5.8.7-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2005 09:01:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 12 02:01:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from uittosatama.fi [217.30.179.138] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EPcUT-0008Su-00; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:01:37 -0700 Received: by uittosatama.fi (Postfix, from userid 573) id 9058FEC826A; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:01:03 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:01:03 +0300 From: Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FTBFS] perl fails on arm with -O2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 X-message-flag: Warning: message not sent with a DRM-Certified client User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: perl Version: 5.8.7-5 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Perl fails to build on arm/armeb with -O2 optimization and current gcc4. with -01, perl compiled fine and pass testsuites withoout a problem. By using the following patch instead of the current 63_debian_ppc_opt.. patch, this (gcc) issue can be worked around. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: arm (armv4l) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages perl depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-19 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libgdbm3 1.8.3-2GNU dbm database routines (runtime ii perl-base 5.8.7-3The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis ii perl-modules 5.8.7-5Core Perl modules Versions of packages perl recommends: pn perl-doc none (no description available) -- no debconf information --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=63_debian_arm_optim Don't need to downgrade optimisation on ppc with gcc 4.0 diff -Naur --exclude=debian perl-5.8.7.orig/hints/linux.sh perl-5.8.7/hints/linux.sh --- perl-5.8.7.orig/hints/linux.sh 2005-04-05 06:08:31.0 +1000 +++ perl-5.8.7/hints/linux.sh 2005-10-11 11:00:00.0 + @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ '') optimize='-O2' case `uname -m` in -ppc*) +arm*) # on ppc, it seems that gcc (at least gcc 3.3.2) isn't happy # with -O2 ; so downgrade to -O1. optimize='-O1' --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq-- --- Received: (at 333510-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 15:48:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 08:48:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERXCg-00062D-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700 From: Brendan O'Dea [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#333510: fixed in perl 5.8.7-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: perl Source-Version: 5.8.7-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libcgi-fast-perl_5.8.7-7_all.deb to pool/main/p/perl/libcgi-fast-perl_5.8.7-7_all.deb libperl-dev_5.8.7-7_sparc.deb to pool/main/p/perl/libperl-dev_5.8.7-7_sparc.deb
Bug#265766: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDU8af5UTeB5t8Mo0RAiI8AKCXhwzi3CgU6gdm1lbPX+XyZJhCwwCgkLLM
8Wizj0JaLWuikFQUvjycEH0=
=n3wP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u gpsim-0.20.14/config.guess gpsim-0.20.14/config.guess
--- gpsim-0.20.14/config.guess
+++ gpsim-0.20.14/config.guess
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
#! /bin/sh
# Attempt to guess a canonical system name.
# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
-# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-timestamp='2004-07-19'
+timestamp='2005-08-03'
# This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -17,13 +17,15 @@
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street - Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
+# 02110-1301, USA.
#
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
# distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
# configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
# the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
+
# Originally written by Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED].
# Please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Submit a context
# diff and a properly formatted ChangeLog entry.
@@ -53,7 +55,7 @@
GNU config.guess ($timestamp)
Originally written by Per Bothner.
-Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004
+Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
@@ -66,11 +68,11 @@
while test $# -gt 0 ; do
case $1 in
--time-stamp | --time* | -t )
- echo $timestamp ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $timestamp ; exit ;;
--version | -v )
- echo $version ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $version ; exit ;;
--help | --h* | -h )
- echo $usage; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $usage; exit ;;
-- ) # Stop option processing
shift; break ;;
- )# Use stdin as input.
@@ -123,7 +125,7 @@
;;
,,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$CC ;;
,*,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$HOST_CC ;;
-esac ;'
+esac ; set_cc_for_build= ;'
# This is needed to find uname on a Pyramid OSx when run in the BSD universe.
# ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1994-08-24)
@@ -196,64 +198,20 @@
# contains redundant information, the shorter form:
# CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-OPERATING_SYSTEM is used.
echo ${machine}-${os}${release}
- exit 0 ;;
-amd64:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo x86_64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-amiga:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-arc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo mipsel-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-cats:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo arm-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-hp300:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-luna88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mac68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-macppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvmeppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-pmax:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo mipsel-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sgi:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo mipseb-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sun3:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-wgrisc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo mipsel-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH=`arch | sed 's/OpenBSD.//'`
+ echo ${UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
+ exit ;;
*:ekkoBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-ekkobsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
macppc:MirBSD:*:*)
echo powerppc-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:MirBSD:*:*)
Bug#327312: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDU8sV5UTeB5t8Mo0RAsm6AKCg22QVoIUykQr9as2pN5Fy5jpJegCgvqsn
+Aa6pUTsYTOi9WENLG4lqMc=
=CNe5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u clutils-20031216/debian/control clutils-20031216/debian/control
--- clutils-20031216/debian/control
+++ clutils-20031216/debian/control
@@ -5,12 +5,12 @@
Maintainer: Dale E Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Package: libclutils0
+Package: libclutils0c2
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Section: libs
-Conflicts:
-Replaces:
+Conflicts: libclutils0
+Replaces: libclutils0
Description: Shared libraries for clutils (runtime libraries)
Clifton Lab's Utilities. These are C++ utility classes - specifically,
an argument parser, a configuration file parser, a module loader (that
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
Package: libclutils0-dev
Architecture: any
Section: devel
-Depends: libc6-dev, libltdl3-dev, pccts, libclutils0 (= ${Source-Version})
+Depends: libc6-dev, libltdl3-dev, pccts, libclutils0c2 (= ${Source-Version})
Description: Development files needed to compile programs that use clutils.
Clifton Lab's Utilities. These are C++ utility classes - specifically,
an argument parser, a configuration file parser, a module loader (that
diff -u clutils-20031216/debian/rules clutils-20031216/debian/rules
--- clutils-20031216/debian/rules
+++ clutils-20031216/debian/rules
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
dh_movefiles
dh_installdebconf
dh_link -plibclutils0-dev \
- usr/share/doc/libclutils0 usr/share/doc/libclutils0-dev
+ usr/share/doc/libclutils0c2 usr/share/doc/libclutils0-dev
dh_installdocs
dh_installexamples
dh_installman
diff -u clutils-20031216/debian/changelog clutils-20031216/debian/changelog
--- clutils-20031216/debian/changelog
+++ clutils-20031216/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+clutils (20031216-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * C++ ABI transition (Closes: #327312).
+
+ -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:32:36 +0200
+
clutils (20031216-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Indeed, this does Build-Depend on libltdl3-dev. Don't know
reverted:
--- clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0.postinst
+++ clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0.postinst
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-
-if [ $1 = configure ]; then
- if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/libclutils0 -a -d
/usr/share/doc/libclutils0 ]; then
- ln -sf ../share/doc/libclutils0 /usr/doc/libclutils0
- fi
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
reverted:
--- clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0-dev.postinst
+++ clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0-dev.postinst
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-
-if [ $1 = configure ]; then
- if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/libclutils0-dev -a -d
/usr/share/doc/libclutils0-dev ]; then
- ln -sf ../share/doc/libclutils0-dev /usr/doc/libclutils0-dev
- fi
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
reverted:
--- clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0.files
+++ clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0.files
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-usr/lib/libclutils.so.0
-usr/lib/libclutils.so.0.0.0
reverted:
--- clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0.prerm
+++ clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0.prerm
@@ -1,7 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-
-if [ \( $1 = upgrade -o $1 = remove \) -a -L /usr/doc/libclutils0 ];
then
- rm -f /usr/doc/libclutils0
-fi
-
-#DEBHELPER#
reverted:
--- clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0.dirs
+++ clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0.dirs
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-usr/lib
reverted:
--- clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0.docs
+++ clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0.docs
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-README
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0c2.dirs
+++ clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0c2.dirs
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+usr/lib
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0c2.docs
+++ clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0c2.docs
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+README
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0c2.files
+++ clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0c2.files
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+usr/lib/libclutils.so.0
+usr/lib/libclutils.so.0.0.0
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- clutils-20031216.orig/debian/libclutils0c2.prerm
+++ clutils-20031216/debian/libclutils0c2.prerm
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+if [ \( $1 = upgrade -o $1 = remove \) -a -L /usr/doc/libclutils0 ];
then
+ rm -f /usr/doc/libclutils0
+fi
+
+#DEBHELPER#
Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors
[Dan Griswold] That's what I thought when I looked in the changelog. I upgrade very frequently, so my replaced version must be the immediately previous one, 1.9-2. Can you try to verify this by installing the old binary package and see if it get rid of the problem? URL:ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/plan/netplan_1.9-2_i386.deb strace doesn't appear to report much of value (although I could be mistaken). Probably right. Can you try with ltrace? valgrind reports the following in its summary: [...] Several of the errors reported above that summary are Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) Those are the ones I am interested in. But it would be more useful if the binary was compiled with debugging symbols included. I'm not sure about your skill profile, so I make a stepwise list of instructions. apt-get source plan cd plan-1.9 debuild make -C src clean linux DEBUG=-g valgrind src/netplan If I got this right, you should have a netplan binary compiled with debug information, and run it under valgrind. I don't know what I'm doing with gdb, so I'll hold off until instructed further. Use the same binary as above, and run these commands: gdb src/netplan break exit run # It should now stop when exit() is called bt The output from the 'bt' command should be the backtrace at the point were it exits. Thank you so much for your help. Thank you for your patience. I hope we can figure this one out. I had a look at the code, and have no idea how your problem could have been introduced by the recent changes. Do you have any special netplan configuration? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334387: liballegro4.1-dbg: not installable in sid
Package: liballegro4.1-dbg Version: 2:4.1.15-5.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install liballegro4.1-dbg Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: liballegro4.1-dbg: Depends: liballegro-dev (= 2:4.1.15-5.1) but 2:4.1.15-6 is to be installed E: Broken packages Did you drop the -dbg package ? If so, it should be removed from the archive. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages liballegro4.1-dbg depends on: ii liballegro-dev 2:4.1.15-6 development files for the Allegro ii libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libx11-6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxpm4 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X pixmap library ii xlibs6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System client libraries m liballegro4.1-dbg recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#288819: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDU9AH5UTeB5t8Mo0RAvQxAJ9afJO492wBXz1mKBtJGNIzVkXixQCaArWu
JHz4zvc5wev+7ZAqp6/peP8=
=Z60h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u zipios++-0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07/config.guess
zipios++-0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07/config.guess
--- zipios++-0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07/config.guess
+++ zipios++-0.1.5.9+cvs.2004.02.07/config.guess
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-timestamp='2005-04-22'
+timestamp='2005-08-03'
# This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -17,13 +17,15 @@
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street - Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
+# 02110-1301, USA.
#
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
# distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
# configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
# the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
+
# Originally written by Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED].
# Please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Submit a context
# diff and a properly formatted ChangeLog entry.
@@ -66,11 +68,11 @@
while test $# -gt 0 ; do
case $1 in
--time-stamp | --time* | -t )
- echo $timestamp ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $timestamp ; exit ;;
--version | -v )
- echo $version ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $version ; exit ;;
--help | --h* | -h )
- echo $usage; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $usage; exit ;;
-- ) # Stop option processing
shift; break ;;
- )# Use stdin as input.
@@ -123,7 +125,7 @@
;;
,,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$CC ;;
,*,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$HOST_CC ;;
-esac ;'
+esac ; set_cc_for_build= ;'
# This is needed to find uname on a Pyramid OSx when run in the BSD universe.
# ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1994-08-24)
@@ -196,55 +198,20 @@
# contains redundant information, the shorter form:
# CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-OPERATING_SYSTEM is used.
echo ${machine}-${os}${release}
- exit 0 ;;
-amd64:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo x86_64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-amiga:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-cats:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo arm-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-hp300:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-luna88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mac68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-macppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvmeppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sgi:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo mips64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sun3:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH=`arch | sed 's/OpenBSD.//'`
+ echo ${UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
+ exit ;;
*:ekkoBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-ekkobsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
macppc:MirBSD:*:*)
echo powerppc-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:MirBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
alpha:OSF1:*:*)
case $UNAME_RELEASE in
*4.0)
@@ -297,40 +264,43 @@
# A Xn.n version is an unreleased experimental baselevel.
# 1.2 uses 1.2 for uname -r.
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-dec-osf`echo ${UNAME_RELEASE} | sed -e
's/^[PVTX]//' | tr 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'`
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*)
# How do we know it's Interix rather than the generic POSIX subsystem?
# Should we change UNAME_MACHINE based on the output of uname instead
# of the specific Alpha model?
echo alpha-pc-interix
-
Bug#329759: unfixed
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:28:52PM +0200, Loic Minier wrote: On Mon, Oct 17, 2005, Ryan Murray wrote: Sorry, but depending on gconf2 does not fix this. The prerm script needs to not fail if gconf2 is unavailable. Can you -vv your remark? You want the dh_gconf to be more robust? Setting up libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0 (0.8.11-1.1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0.postinst: line 5: /usr/sbin/gconf-schemas: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Removing libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0 ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0.prerm: line 5: /usr/sbin/gconf-schemas: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0 (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 I want the package to install and purge without errors. It seems that the NMU doesn't have gconf2 as a depends, still. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#333768: Acknowledgement (inkscape: editing text changes font size)
I found that this bug cannot be reproduced consistently. 1. Sometimes inkscape behaves as previously reported 2. Sometimes, the font size will decrease (opposite of what was reported) 3. Sometimes, inkscapes behaves correctly (no corruption of font size). Right now I don't have any idea what triggers either of the above. It seems that new drawings tend to behave correctly, and old drawings tend to trigger bugs. I have a drawing that I have been using with inkscape for months that previously edited correctly but it is now triggering this bug since last week. However, last week inkscape increased the font size whenever I edited text through the Text and Font dialog, but today it decreases the font size, so I am not sure if it is related to the svg files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327312: Intention to NMU
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. I uploaded a new version over the weekend (to anonymous-ftp-master) that was rejected. It looked almost identical to your version here. I believe that I did not base my version off of the latest in Debian - now I need to see why that is. In any case, I am working on this and my other packages - sorry for being slow. Thanks, Dale -- Dale E. Martin - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://the-martins.org/~dmartin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 329759
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 tags 329759 - fixed Bug#329759: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not found Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289318: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDU9GG5UTeB5t8Mo0RAtn2AJ0bsIyTHOlxuD0zyXCD4Fd3yNx+MQCbB836
p1AmS7K5iOYoPdn67gevQmk=
=kkvJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u dctc-0.85.9/config.guess dctc-0.85.9/config.guess
--- dctc-0.85.9/config.guess
+++ dctc-0.85.9/config.guess
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
#! /bin/sh
# Attempt to guess a canonical system name.
# Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
-# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-timestamp='2004-08-13'
+timestamp='2005-08-03'
# This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -17,13 +17,15 @@
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street - Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
+# 02110-1301, USA.
#
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
# distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
# configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
# the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
+
# Originally written by Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED].
# Please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Submit a context
# diff and a properly formatted ChangeLog entry.
@@ -53,7 +55,7 @@
GNU config.guess ($timestamp)
Originally written by Per Bothner.
-Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004
+Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
@@ -66,11 +68,11 @@
while test $# -gt 0 ; do
case $1 in
--time-stamp | --time* | -t )
- echo $timestamp ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $timestamp ; exit ;;
--version | -v )
- echo $version ; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $version ; exit ;;
--help | --h* | -h )
- echo $usage; exit 0 ;;
+ echo $usage; exit ;;
-- ) # Stop option processing
shift; break ;;
- )# Use stdin as input.
@@ -123,7 +125,7 @@
;;
,,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$CC ;;
,*,*) CC_FOR_BUILD=$HOST_CC ;;
-esac ;'
+esac ; set_cc_for_build= ;'
# This is needed to find uname on a Pyramid OSx when run in the BSD universe.
# ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1994-08-24)
@@ -196,55 +198,20 @@
# contains redundant information, the shorter form:
# CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-OPERATING_SYSTEM is used.
echo ${machine}-${os}${release}
- exit 0 ;;
-amd64:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo x86_64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-amiga:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-cats:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo arm-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-hp300:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-luna88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mac68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-macppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme68k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvme88k:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m88k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-mvmeppc:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo powerpc-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sgi:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo mips64-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
-sun3:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo m68k-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:OpenBSD:*:*)
- echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH=`arch | sed 's/OpenBSD.//'`
+ echo ${UNAME_MACHINE_ARCH}-unknown-openbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
+ exit ;;
*:ekkoBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-ekkobsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
macppc:MirBSD:*:*)
echo powerppc-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
*:MirBSD:*:*)
echo ${UNAME_MACHINE}-unknown-mirbsd${UNAME_RELEASE}
- exit 0 ;;
+ exit ;;
alpha:OSF1:*:*)
case $UNAME_RELEASE in
*4.0)
@@ -297,37 +264,43 @@
# A Xn.n version is an unreleased experimental baselevel.
# 1.2 uses 1.2 for uname -r.
Bug#333678: Bug #333678 on libgphoto2-2
Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just wanted to make sure you're aware of this bug report as the NMU'er of the last version of libgphoto2 -- with this version, libgphoto2-2 fails to install without udev also being installed, which is a serious problem, since Well, you're wrong. libgphoto2 does not need udev, it only Recommends: it. The problem is that /etc/udev doesn't exist, which is totally different, and I totally forgot to add that to the dirs file, indeed. Fixing in 2.1.6-5.2. JB. -- Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian, because code matters more Debian GNU/Linux Developer| http://www.debian.org Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323556: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDU9IS5UTeB5t8Mo0RAm+0AJ9ryz8gbaUT2+o1LTLkv61zf2OdXwCeOKHI
gTYOc0Z/YrgADqhMILMUeaY=
=FjFe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u bittorrent-3.4.2/debian/changelog bittorrent-3.4.2/debian/changelog
--- bittorrent-3.4.2/debian/changelog
+++ bittorrent-3.4.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+bittorrent (3.4.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix python-wxgtk2.4 dependency (Closes: #323556).
+
+ -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:26:52 +0200
+
bittorrent (3.4.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix btcompletedir(gui) so they work. Closes: #306398
diff -u bittorrent-3.4.2/debian/control bittorrent-3.4.2/debian/control
--- bittorrent-3.4.2/debian/control
+++ bittorrent-3.4.2/debian/control
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
Package: bittorrent-gui
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${python:Depends}, bittorrent (= 3.4.2-1), libwxgtk2.4-python
+Depends: ${python:Depends}, bittorrent (= 3.4.2-1), python-wxgtk2.4
Description: Scatter-gather network file transfer (GUI files)
BitTorrent is a tool for distributing files. It's extremely
easy to use - downloads are started by clicking on hyperlinks.
Bug#289318: Intention to NMU
+++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 18:29 +0200]: Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Hi Luk, I haven't had time to properly maintain DCTC since a while and will be orphaning it shortly (along with a few other packages). Please go ahead, Grzegorz B. Prokopski -- Grzegorz B. Prokopski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org SableVM - LGPL'ed Java VM http://www.sablevm.org Why SableVM ?!?http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/Features -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334387: marked as done (liballegro4.1-dbg: not installable in sid)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:49:52 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334387: liballegro4.1-dbg: not installable in sid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 16:24:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 09:24:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERXmR-0006hU-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:24:07 -0700 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9A33067C2; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:23:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9D12C811F; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:23:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18502-04; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:23:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D8D742C811D; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:23:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:23:25 +0200 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: liballegro4.1-dbg: not installable in sid X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:23:25 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: liballegro4.1-dbg Version: 2:4.1.15-5.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install liballegro4.1-dbg Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: liballegro4.1-dbg: Depends: liballegro-dev (= 2:4.1.15-5.1) but 2:4.1.15-6 is to be installed E: Broken packages Did you drop the -dbg package ? If so, it should be removed from the archive. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages liballegro4.1-dbg depends on: ii liballegro-dev 2:4.1.15-6 development files for the Allegro ii libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libx11-6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxpm4 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X pixmap library ii xlibs6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System client libraries m liballegro4.1-dbg recommends no packages. --- Received: (at 334387-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 16:49:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 09:49:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERYBN-rL-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:49:54 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D433E7014; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:49:52 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
Bug#334371: only with 'Composite' extension enabled
the thing i changed recently was the 'composite' extension. i disabled it, and now rdesktop works great again. I'm using nvidias accelerated X driver, an a self-compiled debian 2.6.12-10 kernel. juergen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libgphoto2 2.1.6-5.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 333678 + fixed Bug#333678: libgphoto2-2: Fails to install in chroot without udev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334404: fwbuilder-linux: fwbuilder fails to build fw script with Unrecognized host OS linux24 (family linux24) message
Package: fwbuilder-linux Version: 2.0.7-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable fwbuilder can't build a firewall script for linux. Here's the message written when compiling: Unrecognized host OS linux24 (family linux24) Here are some fwbuilder related packages installed on my computer: # dpkg -l | grep fwbuil ii fwbuilder 2.0.7-2 Firewall administration tool GUI ii fwbuilder-bsd 2.0.7-2 Firewall Builder policy compiler(s) for BSD based firewalls ii fwbuilder-common 2.0.7-2 Firewall administration tool GUI (common files) ii fwbuilder-linux2.0.7-2 Firewall Builder policy compiler(s) for Linux based firewalls ii libfwbuilder-dev 2.0.7-5 Firewall Builder API library development files rc libfwbuilder5 1.0.2-1 Firewall Builder API library rc libfwbuilder6 2.0.7-1 Firewall Builder API library ii libfwbuilder6c22.0.7-5 Firewall Builder API library I think the fwbuilder-linux package should provide support for iptables. Nicolas. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages fwbuilder-linux depends on: ii fwbuilder 2.0.7-2Firewall administration tool GUI ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfwbuilder6c2 2.0.7-5Firewall Builder API library ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.5-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsnmp9 5.2.1.2-4 NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-5 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxml2 2.6.22-1 GNOME XML library ii libxslt1.11.1.15-1 XSLT processing library - runtime ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime fwbuilder-linux recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334407: gbib segfaults after update
Package: gbib Version: 0.1.2-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, after upgrading from version 0.1.2-6 gbib segfaults on program startup and dumps a core file. The command: gdb -c core `which gbib` tells me: #0 0x0f77bfa0 in __gnu_cxx::__pooltrue::_M_reclaim_block () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 I hope, this helps to locate the bug. So long, the problem can be circumvented by downgrading to the former version 0.1.2-6. Regards, Peter -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2-peter Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gbib depends on: ii gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-24 imaging library for use with gtk ii libart2 1.4.2-25 The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb33.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0]0.2.36-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libglib1.21.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome321.4.2-25 The GNOME libraries ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-25 The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-25 The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-18 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Input extension li ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m gbib recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289318: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: +++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 18:29 +0200]: Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. Hi Luk, Hi Grzegorz I haven't had time to properly maintain DCTC since a while and will be orphaning it shortly (along with a few other packages). Please go ahead, Shall I orphan it properly with Maintainer set to Debian QA Group and file an O-bug? Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDU+Gp5UTeB5t8Mo0RApYUAJsFkkPD6fM4GVrUgWyqMoBL2MeQmQCfTXqv ms0Gkga836IvhcaOOjjk8RI= =akXD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334146: Processed: bts cleaning
unmerge 333295 334146 reassign 334146 rpm severity 334146 important retitle 334146 rpm should declare Conflicts: Replaces: manpages-pl ( 20051017-1 ) thanks Hi, I'm just uploading new version of the manpages-pl package, which has the conflicting files removed. But for the smooth sarge to etch upgrades the rpm package should conflict with and replace manpages-pl 20051017-1. Best Regards, robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330867: marked as done (libssl0.9.7 g series break pam_pgsql)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330867: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2005 07:53:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 30 00:53:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from monsta.nomaam.hu [193.202.83.85] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ELFhZ-O6-00; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:53:05 -0700 Received: by monsta.nomaam.hu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9916D865EF3; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Krisztian PIFKO [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libssl0.9.7 g series break pam_pgsql X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:52:32 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libssl0.9.7 Version: 0.9.7g-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable libpam_pgsql breaks after upgrading to libssl g from libssl e. the reason (from auth log): PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_pgsql.so) PAM [dlerror: /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.7: undefined symbol: HMAC_CTX_set_flags] PAM adding faulty module: /lib/security/pam_pgsql.so downgrading to libssl0.9.7_0.9.7e solves the problem. libpam_pgsql version: 0.5.2-9 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-ck3-skas3-v8-rc1-bs7-nudi.3 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libssl0.9.7 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an libssl0.9.7 recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 330867-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 17:38:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 10:38:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERYqF-0007h7-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700 From: Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330867: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: openssl Source-Version: 0.9.8a-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openssl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8a-1_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/openssl/libcrypto0.9.8-udeb_0.9.8a-1_i386.udeb libssl-dev_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl-dev_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.8-dbg_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb libssl0.9.8_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/libssl0.9.8_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb openssl_0.9.8a-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8a-1.diff.gz openssl_0.9.8a-1.dsc to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8a-1.dsc openssl_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8a-1_i386.deb openssl_0.9.8a.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/openssl/openssl_0.9.8a.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated openssl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that
Bug#333349: marked as done (openssl: Must either version symbols or conflict with ALL libraries linked to previous version)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330867: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2005 13:42:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 06:42:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EPKOe-00071T-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:42:24 -0700 Received: from c91fc4c8.cps.virtua.com.br (khazad-dum.debian.net) [201.31.196.200] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1EPKOd-0001Q8-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:42:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ED8205A16; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:42:17 -0300 (BRT) Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (khazad-dum [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04535-02-2; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:42:17 -0300 (BRT) Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08FEB20024D; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:42:17 -0300 (BRT) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:42:17 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openssl: Must either version symbols or conflict with ALL libraries linked to previous version Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 0FE3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at khazad-dum.debian.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software OpenSSL does not version symbols. This means all applications that somehow end up linked to both openssl 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 segfault or behave otherwise erratically (which would be a critical bug by itself, as openssl is a data privacy/authentication framework with severe consequences for overall system security). Therefore, ANY new ABI-introducing version of openssl has to conflict with ALL **libraries** (not applications) that are linked against other openssl versions. Not doing so is just hiding the mess for the users to find out as segfaults. Transitions like this should be enforced by package dependencies, always. The whole deal is made even worse because some of the libraries linking to openssl are used by PAM modules and/or nssswitch modules, and thus dlopen()ed by a lot/potentially all applications in the system. The conflicts are quite messy, but unless either symbol versioning or another technique that avoids the symbol mess while linked is employed (weak symbols might do it, I think -- but symbol versioning is much easier to predict and understand), it is what must be done. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4-debian1+libata+bluesmoke+imq+lm85 Locale: LANG=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages openssl depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8-2SSL shared libraries openssl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh --- Received: (at 330867-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 17:38:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 10:38:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERYqF-0007h7-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:32:07 -0700 From: Christoph Martin
Processed: Re: Processed: bts cleaning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unmerge 333295 334146 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign 334146 rpm Bug#334146: rpm and manpages-pl contain the same files Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl Bug reassigned from package `rpm,manpages-pl' to `rpm'. severity 334146 important Bug#334146: rpm and manpages-pl contain the same files Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl Severity set to `important'. retitle 334146 rpm should declare Conflicts: Replaces: manpages-pl ( 20051017-1 ) Bug#334146: rpm and manpages-pl contain the same files Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#199557: NMU?
Hi Frank, Thanks very much for taking care of this. Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Hi. Openal currently fails to build on mips and mipsel again since you again missed to include the NMU patches in subsequent uploads. Please consider the following updated patch. If you don't raise any objections I will upload a NMU tomorrow. diff -Naur openal-0.2005080600.bak/debian/changelog openal-0.2005080600/debian/changelog --- openal-0.2005080600.bak/debian/changelog2005-10-13 19:17:47.0 +0200 +++ openal-0.2005080600/debian/changelog2005-10-13 19:28:24.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +openal (0.2005080600-2.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Reapply the previous NMU patches for fixing mips(el) builds +(Closes: #199557, #283117) + + -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:27:27 +0200 + openal (0.2005080600-2) unstable; urgency=low * added openal-config (Closes: #323054) diff -Naur openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/config.h.in openal-0.2005080600/linux/config.h.in --- openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/config.h.in 2005-10-13 19:17:47.0 +0200 +++ openal-0.2005080600/linux/config.h.in 2005-10-13 19:18:40.0 +0200 @@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ #undef BOMB /* undocumented */ -#undef BROKEN_LIBIO - -/* undocumented */ #undef BSD_TARGET /* undocumented */ diff -Naur openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/configure openal-0.2005080600/linux/configure --- openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/configure 2005-10-13 19:17:47.0 +0200 +++ openal-0.2005080600/linux/configure 2005-10-13 19:22:31.0 +0200 @@ -3012,7 +3012,6 @@ *i486*) CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -march=i486 ;; *i586*) CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -march=i586 ;; *i686*) CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -march=i686 ;; -mips*) CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -march=mips ;; esac fi @@ -3514,16 +3513,7 @@ case $target in *linux*) -case $target in - *mips* ) - -cat confdefs.h \_ACEOF -#define BROKEN_LIBIO 1 -_ACEOF - ;; - *) ;; -esac -WFLAGS=$WFLAGS -ansi +WFLAGS=$WFLAGS -ansi cat confdefs.h \_ACEOF #define LINUX_TARGET 1 diff -Naur openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/configure.ac openal-0.2005080600/linux/configure.ac --- openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/configure.ac 2005-03-31 15:50:34.0 +0200 +++ openal-0.2005080600/linux/configure.ac 2005-10-13 19:22:20.0 +0200 @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ *i486*) CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -march=i486 ;; *i586*) CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -march=i586 ;; *i686*) CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -march=i686 ;; -mips*) CFLAGS=$CFLAGS -march=mips ;; esac fi @@ -129,11 +128,6 @@ case $target in *linux*) dnl subtest for mips/linux systems with broken libio headers -case $target in - *mips* ) - AC_DEFINE(BROKEN_LIBIO, 1, [undocumented]) ;; - *) ;; -esac WFLAGS=$WFLAGS -ansi AC_DEFINE(LINUX_TARGET, 1, [undocumented]) OS_OBJS=\$(LIN_OBJS) ;; diff -Naur openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/jlib/globals.c openal-0.2005080600/linux/jlib/globals.c --- openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/jlib/globals.c2003-06-20 21:23:05.0 +0200 +++ openal-0.2005080600/linux/jlib/globals.c2005-10-13 19:19:33.0 +0200 @@ -14,11 +14,6 @@ #include ctype.h -#ifdef BROKEN_LIBIO -#include libio.h -#define __underflow __broken_underflow -#define __overflow __broken_overflow -#endif /* BROKEN_LIBIO */ #include stdio.h #include stdlib.h diff -Naur openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/jlib/hash.c openal-0.2005080600/linux/jlib/hash.c --- openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/jlib/hash.c 2003-06-20 21:23:05.0 +0200 +++ openal-0.2005080600/linux/jlib/hash.c 2005-10-13 19:19:33.0 +0200 @@ -1,13 +1,6 @@ #define NOJLIB #include ../src/al_siteconfig.h -#ifdef BROKEN_LIBIO -#include libio.h -#define __underflow __broken_underflow -#define __overflow __broken_overflow -#include stdio.h -#endif /* BROKEN_LIBIO */ - #include stdio.h #include stdlib.h #include string.h diff -Naur openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/src/al_siteconfig.h openal-0.2005080600/linux/src/al_siteconfig.h --- openal-0.2005080600.bak/linux/src/al_siteconfig.h 2002-09-16 16:39:54.0 +0200 +++ openal-0.2005080600/linux/src/al_siteconfig.h 2005-10-13 19:19:33.0 +0200 @@ -52,19 +52,4 @@ #include ../include/jlib.h #endif - -#ifdef BROKEN_LIBIO -#include libio.h -#define __underflow __broken_underflow -#define __overflow __broken_overflow -#include stdio.h - -#define __ASSEMBLER__ -#include errnos.h - -#define __USE_POSIX -#include signal.h - -#endif /* BROKEN_LIBIO */ - #endif /* AL_SITE_CONFIG_H_ */ Gruesse, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328243: More info on slibcat creation on slib package
Hi. On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:11:14 +0100 Simon Richard Clarkstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I checked in /usr/share/, and found that /usr/share/slibcat did not exist, and permissions (0755) ensured that only root would be able to create this file. Upon reading the documentation, I found that SLIB attempts to create slibcat if it does not exist. Since the catalogue must be created by root, and must be created before the SLIB is usable, it should be created at install-time, so that the package will be immediately usable without an admin having to run (require 'new-catalogue) or whatever. The postinst script of the package does the following: if [ -x /usr/bin/guile-1.6 -a -e /usr/share/guile/1.6/slib ] ; then rm -f /usr/share/guile/1.6/slibcat /usr/bin/guile-1.6 -c (use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'new-catalog) if [ -e /usr/share/guile/1.6/slibcat ] ; then chmod 644 /usr/share/guile/1.6/slibcat fi fi --- I'm not familiar with slib, but my guess is that somehow you are not using the default guile implementation but the priority-queues one. Also, this kind of slibcat issue had been previously discussed on bug #75891. Hope this info is useful. -- Alejandro Ríos Peña Ing. en Electrónica y Telecomunicaciones. Avatar ltda. Grupo GNU/Linux Universidad del Cauca - GLUC. Comunidad Debian-Colombia. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can you try to verify this by installing the old binary package and see if it get rid of the problem? URL:ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/plan/netplan_1.9-2_i386.deb Verified. 1.9-2 runs, and I can access my served calendars from plan. Good to know that this can be my workaround, if need be. Can you try with ltrace? Yields nothing obviously of value. valgrind reports the following in its summary: [...] Several of the errors reported above that summary are Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) Those are the ones I am interested in. But it would be more useful if the binary was compiled with debugging symbols included. I'm not sure about your skill profile, so I make a stepwise list of instructions. Good call. I welcome the instructions. apt-get source plan cd plan-1.9 debuild Failed at this point with these errors: gpg: skipped Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: secret key not available gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available debsign: gpg error occurred! Aborting So, I guess I need to gpg --import foo. Yes? Do you have any special netplan configuration? I don't know if it's special, but I have 12 calendar files in the calendar directory (/var/lib/plan/netplan.dir/). One of them is 30k, the others are all less than 5k. I also use the web interface, but it runs only when accessed (rare here) and, from what I can grok (via grep), the cgi scripts do not call netplan directly, but only by means of plan. Many thanks, Dan -- -- Dan Griswold Rochester, NY -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#289318: Intention to NMU
+++ Luk Claes [17/10/05 19:38 +0200]: Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: I haven't had time to properly maintain DCTC since a while and will be orphaning it shortly (along with a few other packages). Please go ahead, Shall I orphan it properly with Maintainer set to Debian QA Group and file an O-bug? That would be very nice of you. Please also do the same for dcgui package, because these two are pretty much always used together. Thanks, Grzegorz B. Prokopski PS: This mail is GPG-signed so there were no doubts about its origins. -- Grzegorz B. Prokopski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org SableVM - LGPL'ed Java VM http://www.sablevm.org Why SableVM ?!?http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/Features signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#333522: possible problem cause: wait4(-1)
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 23:07 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: Any comments? Martin Wilck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1. I do not understand how this can happen. request_module() cannot occur until usermodehelper_init() is called. This is only done once the init thread is spawned, which should take pid 1. Also, reparenting should happen to the process in the kernel which is child_reaper, even if another process were to have PID 1... Rusty. -- A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: bts cleaning
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: unmerge 334146 Bug#334146: rpm should declare Conflicts: Replaces: manpages-pl ( 20051017-1 ) Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl Disconnected #334146 from all other report(s). severity 333295 serious Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl Severity set to `serious'. reassign 333295 rpm,manpages-pl Bug#333295: rpm fails to install becouse of conflict with manpages-pl Bug reassigned from package `rpm' to `rpm,manpages-pl'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334351: netplan: memory errors
[Dan Griswold] Can you try with ltrace? Yields nothing obviously of value. Well, please send the last 50 lines anyway, to let me know what is going on when it fails. And send the last 50 strace lines as well, though I do not expect them to tell me much. So, I guess I need to gpg --import foo. Yes? No need to update your GPG keyring. The build error is expected and non-fatal. The build is complete, and you can continue with the instructions. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
