Bug#337346: guile-1.6-slib: Broken in slightly different way in 1.6.7-2

[Mika Bostrom]

Package: guile-1.6-slib
Version: 1.6.7-2
Followup-For: Bug #337346

  It appears this bug still bites, although not exactly like before.
Upgraded packages just now, gnucash fails to start due to this:

% gnucash
ERROR: Unbound variable: hash-for-each

  Downgrading slib package to 3a1-4.2 fixes the problem again. Hence,
this is very likely in the same package as before. Nasty.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.2
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages guile-1.6-slib depends on:
ii  guile-1.6 1.6.7-2The GNU extension language and Sch
ii  slib  3a1-4.2Portable Scheme library

guile-1.6-slib recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
 Mika Boström  +358-40-525-7347  \-/  "World peace will be achieved
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]www.lut.fi/~bostik  Xwhen the last man has killed
 Security freak, and proud of it./-\   the second-to-last." -anon?

Bug#345755: fglrx vs. xorg 6.9 -- more information

[Emilian Nowak]

On 2006-01-13 (Friday), at 00:27:09 Joachim Breitner wrote:

> Telling the ati-installer that sid now uses 6.9 and creating the debian
> packages with ati-installer worked fine (using these commands:)
>  ./ati-driver-installer-8.20.8-i386.run --extract fglrx-tmp
>  cd fglrx-tmp
>  $editor packages/Debian/ati-packager.sh #  in the line "sid|unstable)
> X_DIR=x680;;", put a x690 for the
> x680 ./fglrx-tmp/packages/Debian/ati-packager.sh --buildpkg sid cd ..
>  sudo dpkg -i fglrx-kernel-src_8.20.8-1_i386.deb
> fglrx-driver_8.20.8-1_i386.deb

Do you have this driver packaged in this way in some repository? And maybe you
have kernel modules as well? :-P


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344767: Lock during kernel 2.6.14 purge

[Sven Luther]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:27:44PM -0500, Jean-Marc Ranger wrote:
> Sorry to break the party, but the problem is still present.  Kernel 
> 2.6.14-7 and grub 0.97-3.  Purge freeze just after update-grub completes.
> 
> In fact, I'm skeptical that this is a grub bug, since if I remove grub 
> prior to purging the kernel, it freezes too.

Does it also remove the grub hooks in /etc/kernel/* ? Those are the ones
causing the problem, i believe.

> Let me know if anything else is needed or need to be tried.  Or feel 
> free to ignore if 2.6.15 doesn't exhibit this behavior (I didn't try), 
> since 2.6.14-7 is history.

Indeed, if 2.6.15 solves this problem, we can close this bug. But does it ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#254113: ttf-freefont: Horizontal spacing problems also

[Jan Willem Stumpel]

Package: ttf-freefont
Version: 20051206-2
Followup-For: Bug #254113


Version 20051206-2 does not only have problems with the vertical spacing. 
The horizontal spacing may also be affected. When Freemono is used 
as a print font for Mozilla mail messages (using xprint), characters are 
'spaced out' horizontally, giving a very unnatural-looking printout (with 
lines about 60 % too long). 

Spacing along both axes is OK with version 20051102-2. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.1
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages ttf-freefont depends on:
ii  defoma0.11.8-0.1 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f

Versions of packages ttf-freefont recommends:
ii  x-ttcidfont-conf  21 Configure TrueType and CID fonts f

-- debconf-show failed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#324590: now has other test problems

[Florian Ragwitz]

On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:36:40PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Looking into this for a potiential NMU, I found adding netbase was not
> sufficient.  It appears that this package is not compatable with the
> current perl in unstable.

Yes. I'm already aware of that. It's caused by either openssl or
libnet-ssleay-perl, which I also maintain in Debian and upstream.

libnet-ssleay-perl linked against openssl 0.9.7 works fine. Linked
against 0.9.8 it breaks with the above messages. I tried to debug it a
but and turned tracing in Net::SSLeay on. The error message you'll get
is pretty confusing and you can find it in various places on the net as
an unresolved issue with openssl.


Regards,
Flo

-- 
BOFH excuse #2:
solar flares


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#345755: fglrx vs. xorg 6.9 -- more information

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Samstag, den 14.01.2006, 09:28 +0100 schrieb Emilian Nowak:
> Do you have this driver packaged in this way in some repository? And maybe you
> have kernel modules as well? :-P

I don't have a apt repository, but now that you asked, I just uploaded
them to http://people.debian.org/~nomeata/fglrx-for-6.9/

Note that these are not built from the official debian sources, so don't
bug Flavio about any problems with them. You won't need these packages
for long, anyway, as I expect Flavio to upload his packages to debian in
the near future.


Greetings,
Joachim
-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346592: will NMU per 0-day policy

[Thomas Viehmann]

owner 346592 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks

Hi,

just a quick note that I intend to NMU this with Justin's change,
complete NMU interdiff attached.

Cheers

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
diff -u ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
--- ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
+++ ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ocp (0.1.9-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * NMU for x-window-system-dev/xlibs-dev removal. Closes: #346592.
+Thanks to Justin Pryzby for calculating the necessary change.
+
+ -- Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:58:30 +0100
+
 ocp (0.1.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fix build-depends for doc, add texinfo.
diff -u ocp-0.1.9/debian/control ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
--- ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
+++ ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: sound
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, zlib1g-dev, 
libncurses5-dev, libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, libsidplay1-dev, libx11-dev, 
x-window-system-dev | xlibs-dev, texi2html, libadplug-dev, libxxf86dga-dev, 
libxxf86vm-dev, texinfo
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, zlib1g-dev, 
libncurses5-dev, libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, libsidplay1-dev, libx11-dev, 
texi2html, libadplug-dev, libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, texinfo
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: opencubicplayer

Processed: will NMU per 0-day policy

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> owner 346592 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346592: ocp: FTBFS: build-depends on about-to-be-removed x-window-system-dev
Owner recorded as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329686: libkrb53 is working fine now

[Giovanni Ridolfi]

Hello,

sorry to bother you,  but could you please be so kind to /close/ 
this bug properly so that apt-listbugs will not point out a bug 
against libkrb5.3 ... preventing from upgrading gnome and gnomesword ;-)

TIA

Giovanni


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ocp 0.1.9-2.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 346592 + fixed
Bug#346592: ocp: FTBFS: build-depends on about-to-be-removed x-window-system-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300816: marked as done (Broken dependencies means interchange should not be in testing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:28:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Problem no longer applies to etch/sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 01:00:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 17:00:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poland.xtronics.com [63.245.153.165] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDXlS-0004mf-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:00:59 -0800
Received: from root by poland.xtronics.com with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDXlR-0003kr-Sc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:00:57 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Karl Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Broken dependencies means interchange should not be in testing
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:00:57 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: interchange
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5

The upstream author emphatically states that Interchange only works with 
unthreaded Perl.  I've run siege tests on the sample data base and confirmed 
that interchange fails with multiple threads. The package states via debconfig
 that it requires unthreaded perl, yet there the dependency is for 
 perl >= 5.6.0-16 which is threaded. This is really a broken dependency as no 
 such package exists.

There are indications from the mailing list that interchange requires apache1
 (probably due to the threaded mod-perl issues). There is no dependency, 
 suggests, recommends  for < apache 2 yet a configuration script looks for an 
 apache1 config file. 

The original issue of unthreaded perl goes back almost 2 years (see bug 199718)

Compounding this issue is the fact that there are dependencies in the debian 
core packages for the threaded perl package. 

Given that to create a workable system in testing requires running apache1, 
creating a second unthreaded perl and mod-perl, and extensive editing of the 
main program to point at these non existent packages, interchange should not 
be in testing, but only unstable at this time. 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages interchange depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.30.11  Debian configuration management sy
pn  libdigest-md5-perl   Not found.
ii  libhtml-parser-perl   3.45-1 A collection of modules that parse
pn  libmime-base64-perl  Not found.
ii  libsafe-hole-perl 0.08-3.1   Perl module which makes a "hole" i
ii  liburi-perl   1.30-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii  libwww-perl   5.803-4WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  logrotate 3.7-2  Log rotation utility
ii  perl [libstorable-perl]   5.8.4-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information excluded

---
Received: (at 300816-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 09:29:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 01:29:02 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cobolt.net ([213.180.160.231] helo=mustang.cobolt.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExhiY-0006oV-I0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:29:02 -0800
Received: from a81-14-176-78.net-htp.de ([81.14.176.78] helo=[192.168.1.116])
by mustang.cobolt.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExhiW-b6-IL; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:29:00 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:28:12 +0100
From: Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem no longer applies to etch/sid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: Spam

Bug#347324: freeloader: Fails to start on sid

[Julien Valroff]

Hi,

I can't reproduce this problem.
Could you please ensure
that /usr/share/freeloader/pixmaps/freeloader_icon.svg file wasn't
altered?

Can you open it with:
display /usr/share/freeloader/pixmaps/freeloader_icon.svg

Cheers,
Julien




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329686: libkrb53 is working fine now

[Russ Allbery]

Giovanni Ridolfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello,

> sorry to bother you, but could you please be so kind to /close/ this bug
> properly so that apt-listbugs will not point out a bug against libkrb5.3
> ... preventing from upgrading gnome and gnomesword ;-)

It was closed 2005-11-19.  That sounds like a bug in apt-listbugs.  Is it
not coping with the new debbugs versioning support that leaves the bugs on
the bug page even after they've been archived?

Ah, yes.  This is Bug#323626 against apt-listbugs.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321644: mozilla-browser: This bug is completely reproducible for me

[Kevin Brown]

Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1.7.12-1
Followup-For: Bug #321644


There's a web page at work that I use occasionally that triggers this
bug every time.  Recompiling with "-g -O" instead of "-g -O2" fixed it.

Since changing the optimizer flags causes the crashes in question to
disappear for me and apparently others as well, I think it's pretty clear
we're talking about an optimizer bug here.  Patches to the mozilla code
probably aren't going to be as effective as simply changing the optimizer
flags to something that's more reliable.

Since a number of other platforms use -O and not -O2 (possibly for similar
reasons), the most reasonable approach here is to use -O on the amd64
architecture.


One other thing: this same optimization bug appears in gcc 3.4 as well (I
attempted to compile mozilla using gcc 3.4 but ran into the same problem).
So it's something that's been around a while.

Anyone wanna file a bug against gcc on this?




-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages mozilla-browser depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.67 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.3-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig12.3.2-1.1  generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-6  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libnspr4  2:1.7.12-1 Netscape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.10.2-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2   2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxp66.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0.2-1X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt66.9.0.dfsg.1-2 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  psmisc21.9-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  xlibs 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-9  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages mozilla-browser recommends:
ii  mozilla-psm   2:1.7.12-1 The Mozilla Internet application s
ii  myspell-en-gb [myspell-dictio 1:2.0.1-2  English_british dictionary for mys
ii  myspell-en-us [myspell-dictio 1:2.0.1-2  English_american dictionary for my

-- debconf information:
  mozilla/dsp: none
  mozilla/locale_auto: true
* mozilla/prefs_note:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Commit in gnubg/trunk (208 files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 201296 pending
Bug#201296: New upstream release (0.14.3); lots of changes / new options
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tag 345575 pending
Bug#345575: [NONFREE-DOC] gnubg manual covered by the GFDL
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: (sin asunto)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags #346726 patch
Bug#346726: fbi: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346013: mozilla: Confirmed...

[Kevin Brown]

Package: mozilla
Version: 2:1.7.12-1kev
Followup-For: Bug #346013


Yeah, I've confirmed this.  Same problem, same solution, arrived at
independently.  :-)

By the way, Teemu, your crashing problem is likely due to an optimizer
bug in gcc.  Try modifying your debian/rules file and change line 41
from this:

OPTFLAGS=-g -O2 -DDEBIAN

to:

OPTFLAGS=-g -O -DDEBIAN


See bug 321644 on that issue.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages mozilla depends on:
ii  dpkg   1.13.11   package maintenance system for Deb
ii  mozilla-browser2:1.7.12-1kev The Mozilla Internet application s
ii  mozilla-mailnews   2:1.7.12-1kev The Mozilla Internet application s
ii  mozilla-psm2:1.7.12-1kev The Mozilla Internet application s

mozilla recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347407: Request for advice - Re: Bug#347401

[Torsten Werner]

Steve Langasek schrieb:
> Yep, this is exactly what you want to see when using pkg-config for shared
> linking on a GNU ELF platform; everything else is extraneous.

But I need Magick++:

$ Magick++-config --ldflags --libs
-L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib/graphviz -lfreetype -lz -L/usr/lib
-lMagick++ -lWand -lMagick -llcms -ltiff -lfreetype -ljasper -ljpeg
-lpng -ldpstk -ldps -lXext -lXt -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz
-lpthread -lm -lpthread

$ pkg-config --libs ImageMagick++
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib/graphviz -llcms -ltiff -lfreetype -ljasper
-ljpeg -lpng -ldpstk -ldps -lXext -lXt -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz
-lm -lpthread -lMagick++ -lMagick

I do not see any advantage in using pkg-config and I think that the bug
should be fixed in ImageMagick anyway, shouldn't it?


Regards,
Torsten
begin:vcard
fn:Torsten Werner
n:Werner;Torsten
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.twerner42.de/
version:2.1
end:vcard

Bug#319713: Broken build, needs gtk+ > 2.6 AND libglade > 2.5

[Steve Langasek]

On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:42:00PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Steve,
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:32:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > Hello Steve,
> > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:07:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > Does this bug actually apply to unstable or testing, where we do have 
> > > > both
> > > > gtk+ 2.6 and libglade 2.5?  Is anything required here other than a 
> > > > rebuild
> > > > against current unstable?

> > > (Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation and just returned)

> > > I definitly applies to stable and it probably applies to unstable as
> > > well. According to upstream[1], a rebuild (against current unstable) 
> > > should be
> > > sufficient. If you want, I can check this in the next days.

> > Yes, please check it and I can schedule binNMUs for the issue.

> Ok, I just checked in a up-to-date sid changeroot and a simple rebuild
> is sufficient to solve this issue[0].

> [0] Please do not close #319713 but retitle it and ask for tighter
> (build-)dependencies (which would no longer be RC, of course).

Well, in that case I think it would be best to just upload (NMU or
otherwise) to fix the build-deps.

> On the other hand, the latest upstream version (0.9.93) builds fine as
> well[1]. It most likly closes all goobox-bugs except #291567. Right now,
> goobox has trouble accessing my CD-ROM from within my changeroot, so I
> cannot fully test #319719. If you think it is worthwile, I can prepare
> a QA-upload with the new upstream and orphaning goobox.

> Tell me if you think such a QA-Upload would be sensible[3].

> [3] If you prefer, I can also ask Martin Michlmayr who sponsors other
> packages of mine if he thinks a QA upload should be prepared with
> the new upstream version.

We evidently haven't heard anything from Dan yet on this RC bug, so
orphaning may be appropriate -- but he has three other packages in unstable,
so if he's MIA, MIA/QA should be notified first to figure out if all four
packages should be orphaned.

If goobox is orphaned, is it your intention to adopt it?

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#347407: Request for advice - Re: Bug#347401

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 12:01:42PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > Yep, this is exactly what you want to see when using pkg-config for shared
> > linking on a GNU ELF platform; everything else is extraneous.

> But I need Magick++:

> $ Magick++-config --ldflags --libs
> -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib/graphviz -lfreetype -lz -L/usr/lib
> -lMagick++ -lWand -lMagick -llcms -ltiff -lfreetype -ljasper -ljpeg
> -lpng -ldpstk -ldps -lXext -lXt -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz
> -lpthread -lm -lpthread

> $ pkg-config --libs ImageMagick++
> -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib/graphviz -llcms -ltiff -lfreetype -ljasper
> -ljpeg -lpng -ldpstk -ldps -lXext -lXt -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz
> -lm -lpthread -lMagick++ -lMagick

> I do not see any advantage in using pkg-config and I think that the bug
> should be fixed in ImageMagick anyway, shouldn't it?

Yeah... if pkg-config --libs ImageMagick++ is spitting this out, that's an
imagemagick bug. :/

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#347357: marked as done (dwww: FTBFS with new make)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:17:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347357: fixed in dwww 1.9.27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 10:09:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 02:09:49 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr ([129.20.36.164])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwGRp-Cd-BD
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:09:49 -0800
Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37004.math.univ-rennes1.fr 
[129.20.37.4])
by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD4FB88E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:09:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EwGRD-00061z-Ta
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:09:11 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dwww: FTBFS with new make
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:09:11 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=-=-=

Package: dwww
Severity: serious
Version: 1.9.26
Tags: patch

>From my pbuilder build log:

...
perl -e '   \
use lib ".";\
use Debian::Dwww::Initialize;   \
$d=&DwwwInitialize; \
$v="";  \
foreach $k (sort keys %{$d}) {  \
$v.="\t$k=\"$d->{$k}\"\n"   \
if $k ne "DWWW_TITLE";  \
}   \
while (<>) {\
s/#VERSION#/1.9.26/g;   \
s/^.*#DWWWVARS#.*$/$v/g;\
print;  \
}'  \
  < Dwww/Version.pm.in > Dwww/Version.pm
"use" not allowed in expression at -e line 2, near ""
syntax error at -e line 2, near "use lib "
"use" not allowed in expression at -e line 3, near ""
syntax error at -e line 6, near "foreach "
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
make[1]: *** [Dwww/Version.pm] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/dwww-1.9.26'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

I've attached a patch which fixes the build for me.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-patch
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=dwww.diff

diff -urN dwww-1.9.26.old/Makefile dwww-1.9.26/Makefile
--- dwww-1.9.26.old/Makefile2005-04-07 23:40:08.0 +
+++ dwww-1.9.26/Makefile2006-01-10 10:03:19.0 +
@@ -70,20 +70,20 @@
 
 
 %::%.in $(source_links)
-   perl -e '   \
-   use lib ".";\
-   use Debian::Dwww::Initialize;   \
-   $$d=&DwwwInitialize;\
-   $$v=""; \
-   foreach $$k (sort keys %{$$d}) {\
-   $$v.="\t$$k=\"$$d->{$$k}\"\n"   \
-   if $$k ne "DWWW_TITLE"; \
-   }   \
-   while (<>) {\
-   s/#VERSION#/$(VERSION)/g;   \
-   s/^.*#DWWWVARS#.*$$/$$v/g;  \
-   print;  \
-   }'  \
+   perl -e '   '\
+'  use lib ".";'\
+'  use Debian::Dwww::Initialize;  

Bug#326335: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency

[Steve Langasek]

Er... sorry, I just noticed bug #337358, which I don't have a solution for,
and an NMU will break the versioned conflicts in slib... so no NMU after
all.  The patch should still be good, but it doesn't quite go far enough.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 326335 patch
Bug#326335: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 346710, tagging 343813, tagging 334070

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 346710 pending
Bug#346710: gnokii: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> tags 343813 pending
Bug#343813: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> tags 334070 pending
Bug#334070: gnokii: Should Pre-Depend on adduser instead of Depend on passwd
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326335: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency

[Steve Langasek]

tags 326335 patch
thanks

Hi Rob,

I've prepared an NMU for this bug.  The trivial patch is attached, and the
NMU will be uploaded shortly to unstable.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
diff -u guile-core-1.4/debian/control guile-core-1.4/debian/control
--- guile-core-1.4/debian/control
+++ guile-core-1.4/debian/control
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Source: guile-core
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: libtool, debhelper, libncurses5-dev, libreadline4-dev, 
libltdl3-dev
+Build-Depends: libtool, debhelper, libncurses5-dev, libreadline5-dev | 
libreadline-dev, libltdl3-dev
 Build-Conflicts: ash (<= 0.3.8-31)
 Standards-Version: 3.2.1.0
 
diff -u guile-core-1.4/debian/changelog guile-core-1.4/debian/changelog
--- guile-core-1.4/debian/changelog
+++ guile-core-1.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+guile-core (1:1.4-26.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
+  * Build-depend on libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev instead of on the
+removed libreadline4-dev.  Closes: #326335.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:30:11 -0800
+
 guile-core (1:1.4-26) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * remove redundant guile dependency in libguile-dev. (closes: #223159)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#348044: ca-certificates: apt-get install failure

[Debian User]

Package: ca-certificates
Version: 20050804
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Unable to install the process exits with sub-process error.
apt-get remove --purge ca-certificates and later re-installation also fails.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages ca-certificates depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.40 Debian configuration management sy
ii  openssl   0.9.7e-1   Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a

-- debconf information:
  ca-certificates/enable_crts: brasil.gov.br/brasil.gov.br.crt, 
cacert.org/cacert.org.crt, 
mozilla/ABAecom_=sub.__Am._Bankers_Assn.=_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/AOL_Time_Warner_Root_Certification_Authority_1.crt, 
mozilla/AOL_Time_Warner_Root_Certification_Authority_2.crt, 
mozilla/AddTrust_External_Root.crt, 
mozilla/AddTrust_Low-Value_Services_Root.crt, 
mozilla/AddTrust_Public_Services_Root.crt, 
mozilla/AddTrust_Qualified_Certificates_Root.crt, 
mozilla/America_Online_Root_Certification_Authority_1.crt, 
mozilla/America_Online_Root_Certification_Authority_2.crt, 
mozilla/Baltimore_CyberTrust_Root.crt, mozilla/Certum_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Comodo_AAA_Services_root.crt, mozilla/Comodo_Secure_Services_root.crt, 
mozilla/Comodo_Trusted_Services_root.crt, 
mozilla/Digital_Signature_Trust_Co._Global_CA_1.crt, 
mozilla/Digital_Signature_Trust_Co._Global_CA_2.crt, 
mozilla/Digital_Signature_Trust_Co._Global_CA_3.crt, 
mozilla/Digital_Signature_Trust_Co._Global_CA_4.crt, 
mozilla/Entrust.net_Global_Secure_Personal_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Entrust.net_Global_Secure_Server_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Entrust.net_Premium_2048_Secure_Server_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Entrust.net_Secure_Personal_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Entrust.net_Secure_Server_CA.crt, mozilla/Equifax_Secure_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Equifax_Secure_Global_eBusiness_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Equifax_Secure_eBusiness_CA_1.crt, 
mozilla/Equifax_Secure_eBusiness_CA_2.crt, 
mozilla/GTE_CyberTrust_Global_Root.crt, mozilla/GTE_CyberTrust_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/GeoTrust_Global_CA.crt, mozilla/GlobalSign_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/IPS_CLASE1_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_CLASE3_root.crt, 
mozilla/IPS_CLASEA1_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_CLASEA3_root.crt, 
mozilla/IPS_Chained_CAs_root.crt, mozilla/IPS_Servidores_root.crt, 
mozilla/IPS_Timestamping_root.crt, mozilla/QuoVadis_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/RSA_Root_Certificate_1.crt, mozilla/RSA_Security_1024_v3.crt, 
mozilla/RSA_Security_2048_v3.crt, mozilla/Security_Communication_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Sonera_Class_1_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/Sonera_Class_2_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Staat_der_Nederlanden_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/TC_TrustCenter__Germany__Class_2_CA.crt, 
mozilla/TC_TrustCenter__Germany__Class_3_CA.crt, 
mozilla/TDC_Internet_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/TDC_OCES_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Thawte_Personal_Basic_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Personal_Freemail_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Thawte_Personal_Premium_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Premium_Server_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Thawte_Server_CA.crt, mozilla/Thawte_Time_Stamping_CA.crt, 
mozilla/UTN-USER_First-Network_Applications.crt, 
mozilla/UTN_DATACorp_SGC_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/UTN_USERFirst_Email_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/UTN_USERFirst_Hardware_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/UTN_USERFirst_Object_Root_CA.crt, mozilla/ValiCert_Class_1_VA.crt, 
mozilla/ValiCert_Class_2_VA.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_1_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_1_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G2.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_1_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G3.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_1_Public_Primary_OCSP_Responder.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_2_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_2_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G2.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_2_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G3.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_2_Public_Primary_OCSP_Responder.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_3_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_3_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G2.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_3_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G3.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_3_Public_Primary_OCSP_Responder.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_4_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G2.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Class_4_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority_-_G3.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_RSA_Secure_Server_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Secure_Server_OCSP_Responder.crt, 
mozilla/Verisign_Time_Stamping_Authority_CA.crt, 
mozilla/Visa_International_Global_Root_2.crt, mozilla/Visa_eCommerce_Root.crt, 
mozilla/beTRUSTed_Root_CA-Baltimore_Implementation.crt, 
mozilla/beTRUSTed_Root_CA.crt, 
mozilla/beTRUSTed_Root_CA_-_Entrust_Implementation.crt, 
mozilla/beTRUSTed_Root_CA_-_RSA_Implementation.crt, 
quovadis.bm/QuoVadis_Root_Certification_Authority.crt, 
signet.pl/signet_ca1_pem.crt, signet.pl/signet_ca2_pem.crt, 
signet.pl/signet_ca3_pem.crt, signet.pl/signet_ocspklasa2_pem.c

Bug#344712: -5 is affected, replaces/conflicts wrongly versioned

[Peter Palfrader]

found 344712 0.8.11-5
thanks

Unpacking gstreamer0.8-gtk (from .../gstreamer0.8-gtk_0.8.11-5_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/gstreamer0.8-gtk_0.8.11-5_amd64.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.8/libgstgdkpixbuf.so', which is also 
in package gstreamer0.8-misc



[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -L gstreamer0.8-misc | grep 
/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.8/libgstgdkpixbuf.so
/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.8/libgstgdkpixbuf.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l gstreamer0.8-misc
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name  Version   Description
+++-=-=-==
ii  gstreamer0.8-misc 0.8.11-2  Collection of various GStreamer plugins

gstreamer0.8-misc is at 0.8.11-2 so the replaces and conflicts (<=
0.8.11-0ubuntu3) are no good at all.


-- 
 PGP signed and encrypted  |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' :  The  universal
   | `. `'  Operating System
 http://www.palfrader.org/ |   `-http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: -5 is affected, replaces/conflicts wrongly versioned

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> found 344712 0.8.11-5
Bug#344712: gstreamer0.8-gtk: file conflict with older gstreamer package
Bug marked as found in version 0.8.11-5.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347407: marked as done (python-libavg: pulls in spurious deps from Magick++-config)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:02:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347407: fixed in libavg 0.5.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 14:53:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 06:53:17 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwKs8-00013s-KE
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:53:16 -0800
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44AE3067C2;
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:52:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B522C804F;
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:52:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 08526-02; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:52:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 59EAE2C80E3;
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:52:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 
15:52:27 +0100
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: python-libavg: depends on non-existent libdps1 package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:52:27 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: python-libavg
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

with xorg 6.9 libdps1 has been removed from sid and therefore
python-libavg is uninstallable.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages python-libavg depends on:
ii  libaa11.4p5-30   ascii art library
ii  libartsc0 1.5.0-3aRts sound system C support librar
ii  libasound21.0.10+1.0.11rc1-1 ALSA library
ii  libaudio2 1.7-3  The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libavcodeccvs 3:20060101-0.2 library to encode decode multimedi
ii  libboost-python1.33.0 1.33.0-6   Boost.Python Library
ii  libbz2-1.01.0.2-11   high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6 2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdc1394-13  1.1.0-2high level programming interface f
ii  libdps1   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libesd-alsa0 [libesd0 0.2.36-1   Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - 
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.1-0exp6GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libglu1-xorg [libglu1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 Mesa OpenGL utility library [X.Org
ii  libice6   6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjasper-1.701-1 1.701.0-2  The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime libra
ii  libjpeg62 6b-11  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liblcms1  1.13-1 Color management library
ii  libmagick++9c2a   6:6.2.4.5-0.5  The object-oriented C++ API to the
ii  libmagick96:6.2.4.5-0.5  Image manipulation library
ii  libncurses5   5.5-1  Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.10.2-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime
ii  libraw1

Bug#348049: gnomemeeting: uninstallable

[Jan De Luyck]

Package: gnomemeeting
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Package is currently not installable in Debian Sid.

precious:/home/devilkin# apt-get install gnomemeeting
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  gnomemeeting: Depends: libebook1.2-3 (>= 1.2.3) but it is not 
installable
E: Broken packages

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gnomemeeting depends on:
ii  evolution-data-server 1.4.2.1-1  evolution database backend server
ii  gconf22.12.1-8   GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libart-2.0-2  2.3.17-1   Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.3-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0  2.10.1-1   Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-02.10.1-1   The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc6 2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn  libebook1.2-3  (no description available)
ii  libedataserver1.2-4   1.4.2.1-1  Utility library for evolution data
ii  libesd0   0.2.36-3   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-6  GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4   2.12.1-8   GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome2-0   2.12.0.1-4 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-0 2.12.0-2   A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeui-0  2.12.0-2   The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-02.12.2-3   The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.8.10-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6   6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libldap2  2.1.30-12  OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libopenh323-1.15.61.15.6-3   H.323 aka VoIP library
ii  liborbit2 1:2.12.4-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.10.2-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0  1.7-5  lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libpt-1.8.7   1.8.7-2Portable Windows Library
ii  libpt-plugins-alsa1.8.7-2Portable Windows Library Audio Plu
ii  libpt-plugins-v4l 1.8.7-2Portable Windows Library Video Plu
ii  libsdl1.2debian   1.2.9-0.0  Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxml2   2.6.23-1.1 GNOME XML library
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-9  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages gnomemeeting recommends:
ii  libpt-plugins-alsa1.8.7-2Portable Windows Library Audio Plu
pn  libpt-plugins-avc  (no description available)
pn  libpt-plugins-dc   (no description available)
pn  libpt-plugins-oss  (no description available)
ii  libpt-plugins-v4l 1.8.7-2Portable Windows Library Video Plu
pn  libpt-plugins-v4l2 (no description available)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#294844: marked as done (xview: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'copy_1_attr' follows non-static declaration)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:17:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294844: fixed in xview 3.2p1.4-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 21:20:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 11 13:20:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d098239.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.98.239] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CziDg-0003Eq-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:20:56 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CziDb-0006F0-Ii; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:20:51 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xview: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'copy_1_attr' 
follows non-static declaration
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:20:51 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xview
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'xview' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

gcc -fPIC   -O2 -g   -I/xview-3.2p1.4/build/include  -I/usr/X11R6/include 
-I../../../build/include  -I/usr/X11R6/include-Dlinux -D__x86_64__ 
-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  -D_POSIX_SOURCE 
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
 -I/usr/X11R6/include 
-DX11R6 -DNO_CAST_VATOAV -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DOS_HAS_LOCALE 
-DOS_HAS_MMAP -DDYNAMICLIB -DOPENWINHOME_DEFAULT=\"/usr/X11R6\" 
 -c attr_copy.c -o shared/attr_copy.o
attr_copy.c:38: error: static declaration of 'copy_1_attr' follows non-static 
declaration
attr_copy.c:28: error: previous implicit declaration of 'copy_1_attr' was here
attr_copy.c:74: error: static declaration of 'copy_counted_list' follows 
non-static declaration
attr_copy.c:58: error: previous implicit declaration of 'copy_counted_list' was 
here
attr_copy.c:94: error: static declaration of 'copy_singleton' follows 
non-static declaration
attr_copy.c:52: error: previous implicit declaration of 'copy_singleton' was 
here
attr_copy.c:113: error: static declaration of 'copy_null_list' follows 
non-static declaration
attr_copy.c:55: error: previous implicit declaration of 'copy_null_list' was 
here
make[5]: *** [attr_copy.o] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/xview-3.2p1.4/lib/libxview/attr'

With the attached patch 'xview' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xview-3.2p1.4/clients/clock/clock.c 
./clients/clock/clock.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xview-3.2p1.4/clients/clock/clock.c 2005-02-11 
19:43:33.168947605 +0100
+++ ./clients/clock/clock.c 2005-02-11 14:32:13.0 +0100
@@ -147,6 +147,10 @@
 static Notify_value analog_timer_expired();
 static Notify_value icon_timer_expired();
 static Notify_value dig_timer_expired();
+static int min (int a, int b);
+static int seconds_on();
+static int date_on();
+static int armwidth();
 
 typedef enum {digital, analog} Face;
 
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xview-3.2p1.4/clients/olvwm-4.1/gif.c 
./clients/olvwm-4.1/gif.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xview-3.2p1.4/clients/olvwm-4.1/gif.c   1994-01-13 
22:36:06.0 +0100
+++ ./clients/olvwm-4.1/gif.c   2005-02-11 17:35:15.0 +0100
@@ -56,7 +56,10 @@
int disposal;
 } Gif89 = { -1, -1, -1, 0 };
 
-extern XImage* ReadImage();
+static XImage* ReadImage();
+static int ReadColorMap(FILE *fd, int number, XColor *buffer);
+static int DoExtension(FILE *fd, int label);
+static int GetDataBlock(FILE *fd, unsigned char *buf);
 
 XImage *ReadGIF(dpy, fd, pNcolors, pColors)
 Display *dpy;
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xview-3.2p1.4/clients/olvwm-4.1/olvwmrc.y 
./clients/olvwm-4.1/olvwmrc.y
--- ../tmp-orig/xview-3.2p1.4/clients/olvwm-4.1/olvwmrc.y   2005-02-11 
19:43:33.194942592 +0100
+++ ./clients/olvwm-4.1/olvwmrc.y   2005-02-11 17:35:53.0 +0100
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 char   *LookupToken();
 char   *FindOlvwmRC();
 void   resetKeys();
-char   *strexpand();
+static char*strexpand();
 
 typedef struct progscreen {
 char*target;
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xview-3.2p1.4/clients

Bug#347165: marked as done (xviewg-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:17:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347165: fixed in xview 3.2p1.4-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 03:39:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 19:39:31 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvnsZ-0006gd-F4
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:39:31 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1EvnsP-0001Sd-FC
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:39:21 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xviewg-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:39:21 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xviewg-dev
Version: 3.2p1.4-19.1
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package uninstallable.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you should update your Depends field and substitute
  xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that this
  development package needs to depend on. These would be the sum of:

(a) X libraries providing include files that are #included by any
public header file of the package

(b) X libraries that need to be present when statically linking
against this package. To find out these:

- if you ship a .la file, the X libraries referenced in the
  dependency_libs variable

- if you ship a .pc file, the X libraries referenced in the
  Requires, Libs, and Libs.private fields

- if not, the X libraries mentioned in the output of:

objdump -p *.so | grep NEEDED

  where *.so are all the .so files shipped in the package.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 347165-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 12:20:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 04:20:33 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExkLI-0003Co-80; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:17:12 -0800
From: Martin Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#347165: fixed in xview 3.2p1.4-20
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:17:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xview
Source-Version: 3.2p1.4-20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xview, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

olvwm_4.4.3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/olvwm_4.4.3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
olwm_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/olwm_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
xview-clients_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/xview-clients_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
xview-examples_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/xview-examples_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
xview_3.2p1.4-20.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xview/xview_3.2p1.4-20.diff.gz
xview_3.2p1.4-20.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xview/xview_3.2p1.4-20.dsc
xviewg-dev_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/xviewg-dev_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
xviewg_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/xviewg_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for

Bug#346866: marked as done (xview: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:17:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346866: fixed in xview 3.2p1.4-20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:38 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evm0X-0001QH-FU
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:38 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlzy-00076n-7o
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:02 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xview: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:02 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xview
Version: 3.2p1.4-19.1
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346866-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 12:20:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 04:20:39 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExkLI-0003Cm-7I; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:17:12 -0800
From: Martin Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346866: fixed in xview 3.2p1.4-20
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:17:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: xview
Source-Version: 3.2p1.4-20

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xview, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

olvwm_4.4.3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/olvwm_4.4.3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
olwm_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/olwm_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
xview-clients_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/xview-clients_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
xview-examples_3.2p1.4-20_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xview/xview-ex

Bug#348050: python2.4-semanage: Cannot be installed. Conflicting file with libsemanage-dev

[Tomasz Rybak]

Package: python2.4-semanage
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

# LC_ALL=C apt-get install python2.4-semanage
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  python2.4-semanage
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 158 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/37.7kB of archives.
After unpacking 377kB of additional disk space will be used.
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
(Reading database ... 190850 files and directories currently
installed.)
Unpacking python2.4-semanage (from
.../python2.4-semanage_1.4-3_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error
processing /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.4-semanage_1.4-3_i386.deb
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/include/semanage/context_record.h', which is
also in package libsemanage-dev
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/python2.4-semanage_1.4-3_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

It leaves policycoreutils, which depends on python2.4-semanage,
in unconfigured state, and apt-get writes:

You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  policycoreutils: Depends: python2.4-semanage but it is not going to be
installed
E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or
specify a solution).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=polish, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to pl_PL)
-- 
Tomasz Rybak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#348052: pybaz: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: pybaz
Version: 1.5pre1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'pybaz' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

#-/usr/bin/make clean
python setup.py clean
make: python: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/pybaz-1.5pre1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/pybaz-1.5pre1/debian/control2006-01-14 12:11:23.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2006-01-14 12:11:17.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: python
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), python-epydoc, bazaar
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), python-dev, python-epydoc, bazaar
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: pybaz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347996: (no subject)

[Nico Golde]

Hi,
ah ok, seeing in the buildd logs that it also fails.
Will fix it as soon as possible.
Regards Nico

-- 
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons -
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!


pgpYEkEVaXgOS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#347996: (no subject)

[Nico Golde]

Hi,
can you also confirm this bug with the 6.3.1-2 package which 
has been uploaded shortly after -1?
Regards Nico

-- 
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons -
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!


pgpW9KXKhfMw8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: severity of 345168 is important, tagging 345168

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> severity 345168 important
Bug#345168: Sarge version of nscd is completely broken (Fails to cache any 
entry)
Severity set to `important'.

> tags 345168 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#345168: Sarge version of nscd is completely broken (Fails to cache any 
entry)
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309249: marked as done (opencv: #270345 is still present in sarge)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:57:01 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line opencv: #270345 is still present in sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 23:24:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 16:24:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXST4-0005ms-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 16:24:18 -0700
Received: (qmail 9070 invoked from network); 15 May 2005 23:23:47 -
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 15 May 2005 23:23:47 -
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6142A127B0E; Mon, 16 May 2005 01:23:43 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: opencv: #270345 is still present in sarge
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 01:23:42 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: opencv
Version: 0.9.5-10
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge


This is a reminder that archived bug #270345
("Incorrect build on systems with libavcodec installed")
is still present in sarge.

I've set the severity that high because this bug might e.g.
lead to a miscompiled binary package on one architecture
if a DSA for openvc was issued.

---
Received: (at 309249-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 12:57:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 04:57:02 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] 
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Exkxq-00087B-BB
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:57:02 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5E0647005; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:57:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:57:01 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: opencv: #270345 is still present in sarge
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Version: 0.9.6-1

Documenting as fixed in the etch version.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

--OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDyPUdKN6ufymYLloRAiGRAJ97zPCH9wU3P2Gi52ndv8Vq80NlNgCgge6l
U1gVyLKdE4NJeEdpn8CISgA=
=1j3I
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--OROCMA9jn6tkzFBc--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#348049: marked as done (gnomemeeting: uninstallable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:50:22 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348049: gnomemeeting: uninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 12:26:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 04:26:20 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.56])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExkU7-0003rT-Kv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:26:19 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP
id 364B13815E; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:26:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from precious.kicks-ass.org (dD5E00EC5.access.telenet.be 
[213.224.14.197])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BF08E38238; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:26:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.localdomain
([127.0.0.1] helo=precious.kicks-ass.org ident=devilkin)
by precious.kicks-ass.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1ExkTs-0006X2-5e; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:26:04 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jan De Luyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnomemeeting: uninstallable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:26:04 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gnomemeeting
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Package is currently not installable in Debian Sid.

precious:/home/devilkin# apt-get install gnomemeeting
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  gnomemeeting: Depends: libebook1.2-3 (>= 1.2.3) but it is not 
installable
E: Broken packages

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gnomemeeting depends on:
ii  evolution-data-server 1.4.2.1-1  evolution database backend server
ii  gconf22.12.1-8   GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libart-2.0-2  2.3.17-1   Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.3-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0  2.10.1-1   Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-02.10.1-1   The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc6 2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn  libebook1.2-3  (no description available)
ii  libedataserver1.2-4   1.4.2.1-1  Utility library for evolution data
ii  libesd0   0.2.36-3   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-6  GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4   2.12.1-8   GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome2-0   2.12.0.1-4 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-0 2.12.0-2   A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeui-0  2.12.0-2   The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-02.12.2-3   The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.8.10-1   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6   6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 Inter-C

Processed: also not RC except for s390

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # checked with the d-i team; partconf still in use on other archs,
> # so downgrade this bug
> user debian-release@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-release@lists.debian.org (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> severity 328992 important
Bug#328992: partconf: [s/390] No longer recognizes dasd partitions
Severity set to `important'.

> usertag 328992 rc-s390
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: rc-s390.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#348025: Acknowledgement (kdelibs seem to broke MIME types for entire KDE!)

[Rafal Maj]

Update:
this bug is not just grave, it is HORRIBLE - renders entire KDE
unusable, after that upgrade almost no KDE application works (Ksnapshot
can't save, krusader can't operate on files, konqueror dont load any
page, amarok do not start, and so on)

In addition to MIME, the applications complain about io_slave kio_slave

Part of strace which I think my be relevant

access("/usr/lib/kde3/plugins/imageformats/.", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No
such file or directory)
access("/usr/lib/qt3/plugins/imageformats/.", F_OK) = 0
open("/usr/lib/qt3/plugins/imageformats",
O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE|O_DIRECTORY) = 12
lstat64("/usr/lib/qt3/plugins/imageformats/libqmng.so",
{st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=21016, ...}) = 0
access("/usr/bin/imageformats/.", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)

this are parts of strace when in example KSnapshot is about to show the
error message about MIME types.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347996: (no subject)

[Nico Golde]

Hi,
do you see the reason why this happens? I am a little bit 
confused cause I can not reproduce this in a clean chroot 
using pbuilder.
Regards Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons -
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!


pgpvhA5JI6IPv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#335972: FTBFS: Unable to find postgresql header files

[Roger Leigh]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 04:39:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> A patch to fix this RC bug follows.  I will upload an NMU to the 7-day
> delayed queue.  If you upload a fixed version within the next 7 days,
> this will supercede it.

An updated patch is attached.  This is a little cleaner than the last
because it involves no code changes, and will cope with future changes
to the postgresql packaging.

Uploaded to DELAYED/5-day.


Regards,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
diff -urN libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1.original/debian/changelog 
libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1/debian/changelog
--- libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1.original/debian/changelog   2006-01-14 
13:17:19.0 +
+++ libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1/debian/changelog2006-01-14 13:19:52.494078905 
+
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libpgsql-ruby (0.7.1-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: Determine correct PostgreSQL includes using pg_config
+(closes: #335972).
+
+ -- Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:19:05 +
+
 libpgsql-ruby (0.7.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Followup-to new standard version: 3.6.2.1
diff -urN libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1.original/debian/rules 
libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1/debian/rules
--- libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1.original/debian/rules   2006-01-14 13:17:19.0 
+
+++ libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1/debian/rules2006-01-14 13:23:10.126023945 +
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 configure-1.6:
dh_testdir
-$(MAKE) distclean
-   ruby1.6 extconf.rb --with-pgsql-include-dir=/usr/include/postgresql/8.0
+   ruby1.6 extconf.rb --with-pgsql-include-dir=$(shell pg_config 
--includedir)
 
 build-install-1.6: configure-1.6 install
$(MAKE)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 configure-1.8:
dh_testdir
-$(MAKE) distclean
-   ruby1.8 extconf.rb --with-pgsql-include-dir=/usr/include/postgresql/8.0
+   ruby1.8 extconf.rb --with-pgsql-include-dir=$(shell pg_config 
--includedir)
 
 build-install-1.8: configure-1.8 install
$(MAKE)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#347996: (no subject)

[Nico Golde]

tags 347996 + pending

ok found the bug (thanks to peter palfrader for helping).
regards nico

-- 
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
Forget about that mouse with 3/4/5 buttons -
gimme a keyboard with 103/104/105 keys!


pgp8UyBbybvxT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 347996 + pending
Bug#347996: fetchmail - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 
`/build/buildd/fetchmail-6.3.1/debian/tmp//usr/bin/fetchmail': No such file or 
directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> ok found the bug (thanks to peter palfrader for helping).
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> regards nico
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346628: marked as done (bugsx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346628: fixed in bugsx 1.08-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:32 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvlzU-lq-6n
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:32 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlyz-0006jV-CL
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugsx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: bugsx
Version: 1.08-7
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346628-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 13:40:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 05:40:35 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExlVm-0006L9-Cz; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
From: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346628: fixed in bugsx 1.08-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: bugsx
Source-Version: 1.08-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bugsx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bugsx_1.08-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8.diff.gz
bugsx_1.08-8.dsc
  to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8.dsc
bugsx_1.08-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further 

Processed: Re: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#347935: ccache support in pbuilder is broken with 'su -p' not preserving PATH

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 347935 serious
Bug#347935: /usr/bin/pdebuild: Again, the PATH environment variable is lost 
within pdebuild/pbuilder
Severity set to `serious'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#347094: texmacs: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 347094 + patch
Bug#347094: texmacs: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347094: texmacs: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev

[Magnus Ekdahl]

tags 347094 + patch
thanks

The maintainer of this package (Ralf Treinen) is on vacation until 22/1. I prefer to wait until he 
can react to the transition before I (comaintainer) upload anything.


The attached changes the control field according to autodetection by Moritz Muehlenhoff's script 
[0]. It has been tested using pdebuild.


0. http://people.debian.org/~dnusinow/xlibs-split-2005-11-15.tar-bz2

/Magnus Ekdahl
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control  (revision 4)
+++ debian/control  (arbetskopia)
@@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Uploaders: Magnus Ekdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0), guile-1.6-dev, guile-1.6, xlibs-dev, 
libltdl3-dev, libfreetype6-dev, dpatch, autotools-dev, g++ (>= 4:3.3.3) [!arm 
!m68k !hppa], g++ (>= 4:4.0.2-2) [arm m68k hppa], r-base-core (>= 2.0)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0), guile-1.6-dev, guile-1.6,  libxt-dev, 
libx11-dev, x-dev, libltdl3-dev, libfreetype6-dev, dpatch, autotools-dev, g++ 
(>= 4:3.3.3) [!arm !m68k !hppa], g++ (>= 4:4.0.2-2) [arm m68k hppa], 
r-base-core (>= 2.0)
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2

Bug#346766: marked as done (xmotd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346766: fixed in xmotd 1.17.3b-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:05 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evm01-0001PL-I5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:05 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlzw-00074v-PH
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:00 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xmotd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:00 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xmotd
Version: 1.17.3b-1
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346766-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 13:50:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 05:50:34 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExlkI-000783-F5; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:47:06 -0800
From: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346766: fixed in xmotd 1.17.3b-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:47:06 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xmotd
Source-Version: 1.17.3b-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmotd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmotd_1.17.3b-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmotd/xmotd_1.17.3b-2.diff.gz
xmotd_1.17.3b-2.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmotd/xmotd_1.17.3b-2.dsc
xmotd_1.17.3b-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmotd/xmotd_1.17.3b-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be

Bug#348060: x-symbol: Neglected package with RC-bug, should this be orphaned?

[Thomas Huriaux]

Package: x-symbol
Version: 4.43-5
Severity: serious

Hi,

It seems that the x-symbol package is no longer maintained:

* last upload 3 years ago
* contains an RC-bug open 1 month ago, no answer from the maintainer
* None of the bugs reported since last upload have been answered
* New upstream releases available, with wishlist bugs filled more than
  2 years ago

Even if I have no interest in maintaining this package, I think that
finding a new maintainer for this package is better for the Debian's
users.

After three weeks without answer from the maintainer, I will reassign
this bug to wnpp.

Cheers,

-- 
Thomas Huriaux


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#346847: marked as done (xemacs21: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:02:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346847: fixed in xemacs21 21.4.18-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:31 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evm0Q-0001Ob-NZ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:31 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlzv-00073A-7i
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:59 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xemacs21: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:59 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xemacs21
Version: 21.4.18-1
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346847-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 14:11:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:11:38 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Exlyw-0008Us-OC; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:02:14 -0800
From: OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346847: fixed in xemacs21 21.4.18-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:02:14 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xemacs21
Source-Version: 21.4.18-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xemacs21, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xemacs21-bin_21.4.18-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-bin_21.4.18-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.18-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn_21.4.18-2_i386.deb
xemacs21-gnome-mule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xemacs21/xemacs21-gnome-mule_21.4.18-2_i386.deb
xemacs2

Bug#348025: kdelibs seem to broke MIME types for entire KDE!

[Christopher Martin]

tags 348025 unreproducible
severity 348025 important
stop

I suspect someone would have noticed by now if the latest kdelibs were 
simply hosing their entire desktop; there must be something else going on 
here.

First of all, I'd do a dist-upgrade to the latest unstable. The latest 
libdjvulibre package no longer conflicts with kdelibs-data. A nice clean 
purge/reinstall of kdelibs might help, again. Be sure to apt-get clean, 
then re-download the packages, to make sure you're not using something 
corrupted. Also, you might want to move your ~/.kde directory aside (say, 
to ~/.kde-old) and then try again; that way you can eliminate the 
possibility that a problem with your user settings is at the root of the 
problem.

Cheers,
Christopher Martin

On Saturday 14 January 2006 02:16, Rafal Maj wrote:
> Package: kdelibs-data
> Version: 4:3.5.0-3
> Severity: grave
>
> After getting rid of the  libdjvulibre15 (Bug#348020) by removing it
> from sytem (dpkg -r --force-all) now most KDE application dont start up
> because not seeing MIME types.
>
> It looks a bit like:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2003/12/msg00040.html
>
> but my user didnt had such file:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ stat 
> ~/.kde/share/mimelnk/application/octet-stream.desktop
> stat: cannot stat
> `/home/raf256/.kde/share/mimelnk/application/octet-stream.desktop': No
> such file or directory
>
> so that solution didnt worked.
>
> but I found the file:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/mimelnk$ file
> /usr/share/mimelnk/application/octet-stream.desktop
> /usr/share/mimelnk/application/octet-stream.desktop: UTF-8 Unicode text
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/mimelnk$ stat
> /usr/share/mimelnk/application/octet-stream.desktop
>   File: `/usr/share/mimelnk/application/octet-stream.desktop'
>   Size: 2011Blocks: 8  IO Block: 131072 regular file
> Device: 30ch/780d   Inode: 1603820 Links: 1
> Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: (0/root)   Gid: (0/root)
> Access: 2006-01-14 08:07:58.0 +0100
> Modify: 2006-01-06 15:28:47.0 +0100
> Change: 2006-01-14 08:08:17.0 +0100
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/mimelnk$ md5sum
> /usr/share/mimelnk/application/octet-stream.desktop
> dbc402c8f458f0fd99472e65795f7da0
> /usr/share/mimelnk/application/octet-stream.desktop
>
> althoug removing it didnt changed anything.
>
> I tried to install --reinstall kdelibs and kdelibs-data sinc they where
> referencing that file, but it didnt helped either


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#348025: kdelibs seem to broke MIME types for entire KDE!

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 348025 unreproducible
Bug#348025: kdelibs seem to broke MIME types for entire KDE!
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

> severity 348025 important
Bug#348025: kdelibs seem to broke MIME types for entire KDE!
Severity set to `important'.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339230: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:52:44 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbukH-00075I-Dm
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:45 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25476
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:43 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59138F212
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:43 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 29960-24 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:42 +0100 (MET) 13920
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6ugS4009109
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:42 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:42 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: mecab
Severity: important

Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html

This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols.  The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer).  Please rename the
library package to a name with a "c2a" suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.

Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.

If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.

---
Received: (at 339230-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 14:52:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:52:49 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vaj.namazu.org ([61.215.208.42])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Exmlt-0006lg-5d
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:52:49 -0800
Received: from vaj.namazu.org (vaj.namazu.org [61.215.208.42])
by vaj.namazu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB81E200BC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:52:45 +0900 (JST)
From: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-cite: xcite 1.57
X-Cite-Me: =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCRVobKEI=?=
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:52:44 +0900
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Aurelien Jarno's
message of "Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:12:17 +0100")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

I believe that this bug is fixed by Aurelien's patch.  Thanks Aurelien!

-- 
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346889: marked as done (wmfsm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346889: fixed in wmfsm 0.34-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:46 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evlzl-vX-FY
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:49 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1EvlzO-0006yj-Ks
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:26 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wmfsm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:26 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wmfsm
Version: 0.34-8
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346889-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 14:50:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:50:45 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExmgX-0006TR-MJ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800
From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346889: fixed in wmfsm 0.34-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: wmfsm
Source-Version: 0.34-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wmfsm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz
wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc
wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have fu

Bug#325637: segfault upon startup

[Steve Langasek]

Hello,

Are you still seeing this bug in pose?  The backtrace suggests that it's
font related; do other freetype-using or ftk1.1-based programs crash on your
system?

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#347639: marked as done (wmfsm: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -lX11)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347639: fixed in wmfsm 0.34-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 20:17:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 12:17:18 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwmPG-0005cY-Dn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:17:18 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
k0BKHGPR023348
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:17:16 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
k0BKHJ9I010134;
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:17:19 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0BKHJNP010132;
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:17:19 -0800
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:17:18 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wmfsm: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -lX11
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wmfsm
Version: 0.34-9
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

wmfsm failed to build on all buildds, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.


gcc  -Wall -g -O2   -o wmfsm  wmfsm.o ../wmgeneral/libwmgeneral.a  -LNONE 
-INONE -lX11 -lXpm -lXext
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [wmfsm] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/wmfsm-0.34/wmfsm'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/wmfsm-0.34'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/wmfsm-0.34'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

---
Received: (at 347639-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 14:50:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:50:49 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExmgX-0006TT-N9; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800
From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#347639: fixed in wmfsm 0.34-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:17 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: wmfsm
Source-Version: 0.34-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wmfsm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10.diff.gz
wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10.dsc
wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wmfsm/wmfsm_0.34-10_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated wmfsm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:40:46 +0100
Source: wmfsm
Binary: wmfsm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.34-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTE

Bug#339254: [DebianGIS] Re: qgis uninstallable

[Steve Halasz]

On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 13:51 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Paolo Cavallini]
> > Any news about qgis? Seems still uninstallabel on testing, due to
> > bug #339254.
> 
> Are you sure?  As far as I know, the uninstallable problem is bug
> #345148, fixed with my NMU.  It is installable in unstable.
> 
> I did not address #339254 in my NMU, because I got the impression that
> the qgis maintainer did not consider it a bug because the library is
> an "internal" library to qgis.
> 
> Of course the new qgis package will not make it into testing before
> bug #339254 is closed or have its severity lowered, but I believe the
> maintainer and the release managers are the right people to address
> that issue.

I asked the release team to BinNMU qgis for bug #339254. After
discussion with Steve Langasek I decided that qgis needs to split
libqgis0 out into a separate package to conform to policy. I've done
this and sent the package to my sponsor some days ago. It will have to
go through the NEW queue, so it will be some time before it's in testing
again. I don't think you'll have a problem installing qgis from unstable
using apt pinning right now though.

Steve



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346761: pending

[Matthew Vernon]

Hi,

I'm building fixed packages as I type this.

Matthew

-- 
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire
http://www.pick.ucam.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347158: xlibs-dev transition patch libdockapp

[Amaya]

tags 347158 pending
thanks

I intend to lovingly NMU libdockapp, to the delayed queue so that it
enters the archive on monday.

Please speak up if you oppose. 

Thanks!


-- 
 .''`.  sleep: command not found 
: :' :  
`. `'   Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
  `- www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346628: direct dependencies Re: Bug#346628: marked as done (bugsx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Justin Pryzby]

Hello Martin,

I supplied a patch to bugsx fixing the xlibs-dev transition bug.
Unfortunately, I failed to take into account "direct dependencies".
Your package has a direct dependency on x-dev and libx11-dev, which
dependssd on x-dev.  So, your package builds fine, but an additional
build-dependency on "x-dev" should probably be added for the next
upload.

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:48:13AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and subject line Bug#346628: fixed in bugsx 1.08-8
> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
> 
> This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
> If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
> Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
> 
> (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
> talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
> somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)
> 
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
> 
> --
> Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:32 +
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:32 2006
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
> helo=chistera.yi.org)
>   by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
>   id 1EvlzU-lq-6n
>   for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:32 -0800
> Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
> id 1Evlyz-0006jV-CL
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
> From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: bugsx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>   (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
>   autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> 
> Package: bugsx
> Version: 1.08-7
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hello,
> 
>   This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
>   build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
>   no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
>   source.
> 
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
> 
>   To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
>   substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
>   libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
>   information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
> 
> [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
> 
>   As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
>   to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
>   be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
>   testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
> 
> [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html
> 
>   The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
>   so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
>   follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
>   affected packages can be found here [4].
> 
> [4] 
> http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
> 
>   Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
>   be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
>   read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
>   their upload.
> 
>   Thanks for your collaboration!
> 
> -- 
> Adeodato Sim?? dato at net.com.org.es
> Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
> 
> 
> ---
> Received: (at 346628-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 13:40:35 +
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 05:40:35 2006
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
>   id 1ExlVm-0006L9-Cz; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
> From: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
> Subject: Bug#346628: fixed in bugsx 1.08-8
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>   (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X

Processed: Re: xlibs-dev transition patch libdockapp

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 347158 pending
Bug#347158: libdockapp-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: fixes committed in glibc SVN

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 233308 pending
Bug#233308: locales: Esperanto locale should be called eo_XX rather than eo_EO
Tags were: patch l10n
Bug#295573: Please add Esperanto locales
Tags added: pending

> tag 235759 pending
Bug#235759: libc6: iconv's replacement for "German quotes in UTF-8" to latin1
Tags were: fixed-upstream patch l10n
Tags added: pending

> tag 254417 pending
Bug#254417: New locales proposed for South Africa
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending

> tag 254993 pending
Bug#254993: Please add the sr_CS and [EMAIL PROTECTED] locales
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending

> tag 271549 pending
Bug#271549: locales: Please add the mg_MG locale for Malagasy in Madagascar
Tags were: fixed-upstream l10n patch
Tags added: pending

> tag 310635 pending
Bug#310635: some programs segfault when run with belocs-locales-* installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tag 322011 pending
Bug#322011: libc6: assertion fails when logging in to NIS account
Tags were: upstream
Bug#328440: libc6: assertion fails when logging in to NIS account
Bug#336661: libc6: assertion fails when logging in to NIS account
Bug#347545: login crashes when trying to use nis
Tags added: pending

> tag 328831 pending
Bug#328831: Errors while generating mn_MN.UTF-8 locales
There were no tags set.
Bug#344820: locales: mn_MN.UTF-8 is not working
Tags added: pending

> tag 334762 pending
Bug#334762: locales: Please consider adding a locale for Khmer/Cambodia
Tags were: fixed-upstream patch
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346171: libstdc++6 loses changelog/copyright on upgrade

[Adam Conrad]

This comes from you doing your directory->symlink migration in preinst,
rather than postinst (to see an example of it being done correctly, see
openssh-server, or php4-mysql as examples).

If you migrate in preinst, you remove the directory, create the symlink,
THEN dpkg removes your package's files (dutifully following the symlink,
and removing the other package's changelog and copyright)

If you do it in postinst, this snafu doesn't occur, and the world goes
on happily able to read changelogs and licenses...

... Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#345934: marked as done (Can not be installed: postinst fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:13:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.97-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2006 11:42:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 04 03:42:38 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from posti6.jyu.fi ([130.234.4.43])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eu72L-0003HF-MB
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 03:42:38 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by posti6.jyu.fi (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k04Bg5Cx004604
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:42:05 +0200
Received: from heresy.ainola.jyu.fi (heresy.ainola.jyu.fi [130.234.191.114])
by posti6.jyu.fi (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k04BfsUO004578;
Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:41:55 +0200
Received: by heresy.ainola.jyu.fi (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A56AB426D5; Wed,  4 Jan 2006 13:42:03 +0200 (EET)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 13:42:02 +0200
From: Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can not be installed: postinst fails
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
X-Mailer-URL: http://www.mutt.org/
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cc.jyu.fi
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-1
Severity: grave


Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 (2.6.15-1) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
initrd.img(/boot/initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686) points to 
/boot/initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686 (/boot/initrd.img-2.6.15-1-686) -- doing nothing 
at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.15-1-686.postinst line 579.
vmlinuz(/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.15-1-686) points to /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.15-1-686 
(/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.15-1-686) -- doing nothing at 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.15-1-686.postinst line 579.
Running postinst hook /sbin/update-grub.
Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-2.6-686:
 linux-image-2.6-686 depends on linux-image-2.6.15-1-686; however:
  Package linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6-686 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-686:
 linux-image-686 depends on linux-image-2.6-686; however:
  Package linux-image-2.6-686 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-686 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
 linux-image-2.6-686
 linux-image-686
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
E: Some packages could not be upgraded.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 depends on:
ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  yaird [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.0.12-3   Yet Another mkInitRD

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 recommends:
pn  libc6-i686 (no description available)

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.15-1-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
* linux-image-2.6.15-1-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.15-1-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.15-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.15-1-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.15-1-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.15-1-686:
  linux-image-2.6.15-1-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.15-1-686:
  linux-image-2.6.15-1-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.15-1-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.15-1-686:
  linux-image-2.6.15-1-686/p

Bug#346726: xlibs-dev transition patch

[Amaya]

tags #346726 pending
thanks

I intend to lovingly NMU fbi, please speak up if you oppose, monday
starts the "0-delay nmu uploads allowed" stage, and I will upload
accordingly.

Thanks!


-- 
 .''`.  sleep: command not found 
: :' :  
`. `'   Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
  `- www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: xlibs-dev transition patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags #346726 pending
Bug#346726: fbi: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346635: marked as done (bbdate: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:02:09 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346635: fixed in bbkeys 0.9.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:32 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvlzU-le-AN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:32 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlyz-0006jD-7F
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bbdate: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: bbdate
Version: 0.2.4-4.1
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346635-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 16:11:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 08:11:18 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Exnqz-0004gx-Ik; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:02:09 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Barrera C.)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346635: fixed in bbkeys 0.9.0-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:02:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: bbkeys
Source-Version: 0.9.0-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bbkeys, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

bbkeys_0.9.0-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/bbkeys/bbkeys_0.9.0-4.diff.gz
bbkeys_0.9.0-4.dsc
  to pool/main/b/bbkeys/bbkeys_0.9.0-4.dsc
bbkeys_0.9.0-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/bbkeys/bbkeys_0.9.0-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be 

Bug#348076: kmyfirewall: The Kmyfirewall GUI hangs then I start it from the Kmyfirewall menu after I have configured the inittable script. And then the KDE panel hangs also, including K-menu, pager an

[Magnus Berg]

Package: kmyfirewall
Version: Etch
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Sorry! I'm a first time reportbug user and wrote everything on the subject line.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
sv_SE)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347475: Patch proposal

[Amaya]

Regis Boudin wrote:
> I managed to reproduce the bug with pbuilder and found a fix. The
> problem is that the detection the X11 directory is based on the
> detection of libXt. Adding libxt-dev to the build-dependencies means
> the configure script can find where to get the X11 lib.

Also, re running autoconf helped, but I think I uploaded to a delayed
queue, because i got so carried away by the transition LOL
I also hope I didn't NMU myself! 

Will look at the patch, and see if it works!

-- 
 .''`.  sleep: command not found 
: :' :  
`. `'   Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
  `- www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: cloning 346970, retitle -1 to xlog: package should not be native?, severity of -1 is important ...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> clone 346970 -1
Bug#346970: xlog: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Bug 346970 cloned as bug 348078.

> retitle -1 xlog: package should not be native?
Bug#348078: xlog: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Changed Bug title.

> severity -1 important
Bug#348078: xlog: package should not be native?
Severity set to `important'.

> submitter -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348078: xlog: package should not be native?
Changed Bug submitter from Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347940: marked as done (pstngw_1.3.1-5(alpha/unstable): FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -rsudo)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:17:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347940: fixed in pstngw 1.3.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2006 17:05:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 13 09:05:23 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-80-164-222.sbm.shawcable.net
([24.80.164.222] helo=straylight.cyberhqz.com ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExSMd-0005G8-Lw
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:05:23 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5741F3A006
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:05:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 09705-02 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8D3153A004; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:05:22 -0800
From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pstngw_1.3.1-5(alpha/unstable): FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -rsudo
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: pstngw
Version: 1.3.1-5
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of pstngw_1.3.1-5 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 85
> Build started at 20060112-1617

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>=3.0.0), libpt-dev (>=1.8.7-2), libopenh323-dev 
> (>=1.15.6-2), g++ (>=2:3.2)

[...]

> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/pstngw-1.3.1'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/pstngw-1.3.1'
> dh_clean
> dh_clean: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
>  debian/rules build
> dh_testdir
> /usr/bin/make OPENH323DIR=/usr/share/openh323 PWLIBDIR=/usr/share/pwlib 
> ASNPARSER=`which asnparser` opt optshared
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pstngw-1.3.1'
> g++  -D_REENTRANT -Wall  -I/usr/share/pwlib/include -DPTRACING 
> -I/usr/share/openh323/include -DHAS_OSS -O2   -felide-constructors -x c++ -c 
> main.cxx -o obj_linux_alpha_r/main.o
> main.cxx:445:2: warning: #warning linux specific check on ringing
> Assembler messages:
> FATAL: can't create obj_linux_alpha_r/main.o: Permission denied
> make[1]: *** [obj_linux_alpha_r/main.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/pstngw-1.3.1'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=alpha&pkg=pstngw&ver=1.3.1-5

Running the following as a non root user with sudo access will cause pstngw
to FTBFS:
dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -B -rsudo

The problem is that the clean target (run as root) is creating directories that
the build process then attempts to write to (as a regular user), which fails.

Please fix the debian/rules clean target to not create directories, and do
that in the build target where it should be done instead.

---
Received: (at 347940-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 16:21:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 08:21:55 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Exo5b-0002uH-70; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:17:15 -0800
From: Kilian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#347940: fixed in pstngw 1.3.1-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:17:15 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: pstngw
Source-Version: 1.3.1-6

We believe that the bug you reported i

Bug#346622: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u cheops-0.61/debian/control cheops-0.61/debian/control
--- cheops-0.61/debian/control
+++ cheops-0.61/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: libsnmp9-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, debhelper, xlibs-dev, libwrap0-dev
+Build-Depends: libsnmp9-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, debhelper, libwrap0-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.10
 
 Package: cheops
diff -u cheops-0.61/debian/changelog cheops-0.61/debian/changelog
--- cheops-0.61/debian/changelog
+++ cheops-0.61/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+cheops (0.61-12.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 346622.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:08:05 -0500
+
 cheops (0.61-12.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * 0-day BSP NMU.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346592: will NMU per 0-day policy

[Justin Pryzby]

Hello Thomas,

My original mailings didn't take into account "direct dependencies".
ocp has direct build-dependencies on the following packages:

libx11-dev
libxext-dev
libxxf86dga-dev
libxxf86vm-dev
x-dev

So the following 2 are now missing:

libxext-dev
x-dev

(both of which are dependencies of libx11-dev)

The package will build fine, but the direct build deps should probably
be readded.  Sorry about this;  I'll work on providing interdiffs
including direct dependencies to the other 30 packages now.  (I'm
already subscribed to those bugs, so I don't think there's any need to
set ownership).

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:10:01AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> owner 346592 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
> 
> Hi,
> 
> just a quick note that I intend to NMU this with Justin's change,
> complete NMU interdiff attached.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> T.
> -- 
> Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/

> diff -u ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
> --- ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
> +++ ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +ocp (0.1.9-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * NMU for x-window-system-dev/xlibs-dev removal. Closes: #346592.
> +Thanks to Justin Pryzby for calculating the necessary change.
> +
> + -- Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:58:30 +0100
> +
>  ocp (0.1.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
>  
>* Fix build-depends for doc, add texinfo.
> diff -u ocp-0.1.9/debian/control ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
> --- ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
> +++ ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  Section: sound
>  Priority: optional
>  Maintainer: G??rkan Seng??n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, 
> zlib1g-dev, libncurses5-dev, libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, libsidplay1-dev, 
> libx11-dev, x-window-system-dev | xlibs-dev, texi2html, libadplug-dev, 
> libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, texinfo
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, 
> zlib1g-dev, libncurses5-dev, libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, libsidplay1-dev, 
> libx11-dev, texi2html, libadplug-dev, libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, texinfo
>  Standards-Version: 3.6.2
>  
>  Package: opencubicplayer


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346624: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u grig-0.4.2/debian/changelog grig-0.4.2/debian/changelog
--- grig-0.4.2/debian/changelog
+++ grig-0.4.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+grig (0.4.2-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 346624.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:09:11 -0500
+
 grig (0.4.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Use a recent config.guess, config.sub. Closes: #338254.
diff -u grig-0.4.2/debian/control grig-0.4.2/debian/control
--- grig-0.4.2/debian/control
+++ grig-0.4.2/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Joop Stakenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), hamlib-dev (>= 1.2.4-1), xlibs-dev, 
libgtk2.0-dev (>=2.4.0), libxml-parser-perl
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), hamlib-dev (>= 1.2.4-1), libgtk2.0-dev 
(>=2.4.0), libxml-parser-perl
 
 Package: grig
 Architecture: any


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346626: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u airsnort-0.2.7e/debian/changelog airsnort-0.2.7e/debian/changelog
--- airsnort-0.2.7e/debian/changelog
+++ airsnort-0.2.7e/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+airsnort (0.2.7e-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: #346626.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:06:06 -0500
+
 airsnort (0.2.7e-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * new upstream from 2005-01-10
diff -u airsnort-0.2.7e/debian/control airsnort-0.2.7e/debian/control
--- airsnort-0.2.7e/debian/control
+++ airsnort-0.2.7e/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), automake, autoconf, liborbit-dev, 
xlibs-dev, m4, libzvt-dev, libpcap0.8-dev, libgnomeui-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), automake, autoconf, liborbit-dev, m4, 
libzvt-dev, libpcap0.8-dev, libgnomeui-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: airsnort


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346760: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u xdialog-2.0.6/debian/changelog xdialog-2.0.6/debian/changelog
--- xdialog-2.0.6/debian/changelog
+++ xdialog-2.0.6/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+xdialog (2.0.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 346760.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:12:16 -0500
+
 xdialog (2.0.6-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Updated config.{guess,sub}. (closes: Bug#232139)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- xdialog-2.0.6.orig/debian/control
+++ xdialog-2.0.6/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Lenart Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: libglib-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev, automake, debhelper (>> 
3.0.0), gettext
+Build-Depends: libglib-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, automake, debhelper (>> 3.0.0), 
gettext
 Standards-Version: 3.5.2
 
 Package: xdialog


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346646: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u cpanel-0.4.0/debian/changelog cpanel-0.4.0/debian/changelog
--- cpanel-0.4.0/debian/changelog
+++ cpanel-0.4.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+cpanel (0.4.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 346646.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:08:38 -0500
+
 cpanel (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release: cpanel-0.4.0
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- cpanel-0.4.0.orig/debian/control
+++ cpanel-0.4.0/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Kam Tik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 2.0.72), xlibs-dev, libglib1.2-dev, 
libgtk1.2-dev, gettext, slice, zh-autoconvert (>= 0.3.4-1)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 2.0.72), libglib1.2-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, gettext, 
slice, zh-autoconvert (>= 0.3.4-1)
 Standards-Version: 3.5.9
 
 Package: cpanel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346634: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u bdfresize-1.5/debian/changelog bdfresize-1.5/debian/changelog
--- bdfresize-1.5/debian/changelog
+++ bdfresize-1.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+bdfresize (1.5-3.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: #346634.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:06:43 -0500
+
 bdfresize (1.5-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u bdfresize-1.5/debian/control bdfresize-1.5/debian/control
--- bdfresize-1.5/debian/control
+++ bdfresize-1.5/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper, xlibs-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper
 Standards-Version: 3.5.6
 
 Package: bdfresize


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346773: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u xt-0.9.1/debian/control xt-0.9.1/debian/control
--- xt-0.9.1/debian/control
+++ xt-0.9.1/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), gtkglarea5-dev, libglu1-xorg-dev | 
xlibmesa-gl-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev, debhelper, gettext, autotools-dev, 
perl, traceroute, host, libgdk-pixbuf-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), gtkglarea5-dev, libglu1-xorg-dev | 
xlibmesa-gl-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, debhelper, gettext, autotools-dev, perl, 
traceroute, host, libgdk-pixbuf-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: xt
diff -u xt-0.9.1/debian/changelog xt-0.9.1/debian/changelog
--- xt-0.9.1/debian/changelog
+++ xt-0.9.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+xt (0.9.1-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 346773.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:14:23 -0500
+
 xt (0.9.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Changed build dep from xlibmesa-dev to libglu1-xorg-dev | xlibmesa-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346795: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u xcdroast-0.98+0alpha15/debian/control 
xcdroast-0.98+0alpha15/debian/control
--- xcdroast-0.98+0alpha15/debian/control
+++ xcdroast-0.98+0alpha15/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: otherosfs
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Hector Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.32), xlibs-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libpcre3-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.32), libgtk2.0-dev, libpcre3-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: xcdroast
diff -u xcdroast-0.98+0alpha15/debian/changelog 
xcdroast-0.98+0alpha15/debian/changelog
--- xcdroast-0.98+0alpha15/debian/changelog
+++ xcdroast-0.98+0alpha15/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+xcdroast (0.98+0alpha15-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 346795.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:11:22 -0500
+
 xcdroast (0.98+0alpha15-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Add in README.Debian info about ATAPI and the kernel version.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346827: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u xmms-jack-0.15/debian/control xmms-jack-0.15/debian/control
--- xmms-jack-0.15/debian/control
+++ xmms-jack-0.15/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: sound
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, 
libjack0.100.0-dev, xlibs-dev, xmms-dev (>= 1.2.8), libsamplerate0-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, 
libjack0.100.0-dev, xmms-dev (>= 1.2.8), libsamplerate0-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: xmms-jack
diff -u xmms-jack-0.15/debian/changelog xmms-jack-0.15/debian/changelog
--- xmms-jack-0.15/debian/changelog
+++ xmms-jack-0.15/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+xmms-jack (0.15-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 346827.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:14:05 -0500
+
 xmms-jack (0.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347096: (no subject)

[Justin Pryzby]

I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
is no actual direct dependency.

diff -u rigel-0.2.1/debian/changelog rigel-0.2.1/debian/changelog
--- rigel-0.2.1/debian/changelog
+++ rigel-0.2.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+rigel (0.2.1-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 347096.
+
+ -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:10:19 -0500
+
 rigel (0.2.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fix maintainer name.
diff -u rigel-0.2.1/debian/control rigel-0.2.1/debian/control
--- rigel-0.2.1/debian/control
+++ rigel-0.2.1/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: x11
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Søren Boll Overgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libsqlite-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libsqlite-dev, libgtk1.2-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: rigel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347727: marked as done (gpe-contacts: not installable in sid because of dbus transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:47:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347727: fixed in gpe-contacts 0.43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 11:32:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 03:32:39 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ex0h5-0003Ih-Bl
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:32:39 -0800
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7ED3067C2;
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:32:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEC52C80DA;
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:32:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 29108-10; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:31:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 836722C811C;
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:31:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 
12:31:34 +0100
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gpe-contacts: not installable in sid because of dbus transition
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:31:34 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gpe-contacts
Version: 0.36-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

here is the problem:

# apt-get install gpe-contacts
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  gpe-contacts: Depends: dbus-1 (>= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
Depends: dbus-glib-1 (>= 0.23.4) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages


gpe-contacts needs to be updated for newer dbus packages.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages gpe-contacts depends on:
pn  dbus-1 (no description available)
pn  dbus-glib-1(no description available)
ii  gpe-icons 0.20-1.1   Common icons used by GPE programs
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.3-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdisplaymigration0  0.28-3 display migration support for GTK 
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgpepimc0   0.4-1  category management for GPE applic
pn  libgpevtype0   (no description available)
ii  libgpewidget1 0.88-2 GPE Palmtop Environment widget lib
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface 
pn  libmimedir-gnome0  (no description available)
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.10.2-1   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsqlite02.8.16-1   SQLite shared library

gpe-contacts recommends no packages.

---
Received: (at 34772

Bug#346760: (no subject)

[LENART Janos]

I do not grant this NMU if you won't obbey my instruction, as already
mailed to this bugreport. Please read it, and act accordingly if you
upload.

Quoting: "It's okay to NMU this package, in fact please do it! When doing so,
please also eighter adopt the package or set 'Maintainer:' to Debian
QA Group!

--
LENART, Janos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"

On 1/14/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
> attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
> is no actual direct dependency.
>
> diff -u xdialog-2.0.6/debian/changelog xdialog-2.0.6/debian/changelog
> --- xdialog-2.0.6/debian/changelog
> +++ xdialog-2.0.6/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> +xdialog (2.0.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> +  * NMU for xlibs-dev removal; closes: 346760.
> +
> + -- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:12:16 -0500
> +
>  xdialog (2.0.6-3) unstable; urgency=low
>
>* Updated config.{guess,sub}. (closes: Bug#232139)
> only in patch2:
> unchanged:
> --- xdialog-2.0.6.orig/debian/control
> +++ xdialog-2.0.6/debian/control
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  Section: x11
>  Priority: optional
>  Maintainer: Lenart Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -Build-Depends: libglib-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev, automake, debhelper 
> (>> 3.0.0), gettext
> +Build-Depends: libglib-dev, libgtk1.2-dev, automake, debhelper (>> 3.0.0), 
> gettext
>  Standards-Version: 3.5.2
>
>  Package: xdialog
>
>


--
LÉNÁRT, János
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#346613: patches for some xlibs-dev bugs

[Justin Pryzby]

You're right; this didn't include direct dependencies.  canna should
declare a replacement dependency on libx11-dev.

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of perl-tk 1:804.027-1.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 345334 + fixed
Bug#345334: gtk programs crash perl/tk programs (segmentation fault)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 347035 + fixed
Bug#347035: perl-tk: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#348087: udev 0.080 renders AGAIN system unbootable

[Eric Valette]

Package: udev
Version: 0.080-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


udev 0.80-1 is totally crasy about ide device naming with my
setting and ends up with wrong major/minor allocation for 
partition starting with number 5 on my hde disk. It creates 
as much host as partition => I get wrong major minor and 
mount reports errors.

Going back to 0.079-1 fixes the problem.

This starts being really annoying to end up booting with knoppox, chrooting
to my normal / (hde1) and downgrading udev.


-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-06-30 21:23 020_permissions.rules -> 
../permissions.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2005-10-12 22:00 025_libgphoto2.rules -> 
../libgphoto2.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2005-12-19 00:20 025_libsane.rules -> ../libsane.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 2005-12-14 23:57 025_logitechmouse.rules -> 
../logitechmouse.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2005-12-15 00:43 035_kino.rules -> ../kino.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2005-06-30 21:23 cd-aliases.rules -> 
../cd-aliases.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-06-30 21:23 compat-full.rules -> 
../compat-full.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 2005-06-30 21:23 devfs.rules -> ../devfs.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2005-08-20 13:49 z20_persistent.rules -> 
../persistent.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2005-07-16 14:24 z50_run.rules -> ../run.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2005-10-13 21:12 z55_hotplug.rules -> ../hotplug.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2005-08-03 21:26 z60_alsa-utils.rules -> 
../alsa-utils.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2005-09-20 20:31 z60_hdparm.rules -> ../hdparm.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2005-07-16 14:24 z70_hotplugd.rules -> 
../hotplugd.rules

-- /sys/:
/sys/block/fd0/dev
/sys/block/hda/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda1/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda2/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda5/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda6/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda7/dev
/sys/block/hdb/dev
/sys/block/hde/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde10/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde1/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde2/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde3/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde4/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde5/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde6/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde7/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde8/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde9/dev
/sys/block/loop0/dev
/sys/block/loop1/dev
/sys/block/loop2/dev
/sys/block/loop3/dev
/sys/block/loop4/dev
/sys/block/loop5/dev
/sys/block/loop6/dev
/sys/block/loop7/dev
/sys/block/pktcdvd0/dev
/sys/block/ram0/dev
/sys/block/ram10/dev
/sys/block/ram11/dev
/sys/block/ram12/dev
/sys/block/ram13/dev
/sys/block/ram14/dev
/sys/block/ram15/dev
/sys/block/ram1/dev
/sys/block/ram2/dev
/sys/block/ram3/dev
/sys/block/ram4/dev
/sys/block/ram5/dev
/sys/block/ram6/dev
/sys/block/ram7/dev
/sys/block/ram8/dev
/sys/block/ram9/dev
/sys/block/sda/dev
/sys/block/sda/sda1/dev
/sys/block/sda/sda2/dev
/sys/block/sda/sda3/dev
/sys/block/sda/sda5/dev
/sys/block/sda/sda6/dev
/sys/block/sda/sda7/dev
/sys/block/sda/sda8/dev
/sys/class/cpuid/cpu0/dev
/sys/class/graphics/fb0/dev
/sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-0/dev
/sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-1/dev
/sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-2/dev
/sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-3/dev
/sys/class/ieee1394_protocol/dv1394-0/dev
/sys/class/ieee1394_protocol/raw1394/dev
/sys/class/ieee1394_protocol/video1394-0/dev
/sys/class/input/input0/event0/dev
/sys/class/input/input0/mouse0/dev
/sys/class/input/input1/event1/dev
/sys/class/input/input2/event2/dev
/sys/class/input/input2/mouse1/dev
/sys/class/input/mice/dev
/sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev
/sys/class/misc/pktcdvd/dev
/sys/class/misc/psaux/dev
/sys/class/misc/rtc/dev
/sys/class/msr/msr0/dev
/sys/class/ppp/ppp/dev
/sys/class/printer/lp0/dev
/sys/class/scsi_generic/sg0/dev
/sys/class/sound/admmidi/dev
/sys/class/sound/adsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/amidi/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
/sys/class/sound/dmmidi/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/hwC0D0/dev
/sys/class/sound/hwC0D2/dev
/sys/class/sound/midiC0D0/dev
/sys/class/sound/midiC0D1/dev
/sys/class/sound/midiC0D2/dev
/sys/class/sound/midi/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D2c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D2p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D3p/dev
/sys/class/sound/seq/dev
/sys/class/sound/sequencer2/dev
/sys/class/sound/sequencer/dev
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev1.1/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev1.2/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev1.3/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev1.4/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev2.1/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev2.2/dev

-- Kernel configuration:
 isapnp_init not present.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii  initscripts  

Bug#346622: (no subject)

[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 11:48:44AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
> attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
> is no actual direct dependency.

Please don't, I already uploaded an updated package.

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#346827: (no subject)

[Mike Furr]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by Thomas Viehmann; the
> attached patch simply drops the dependency on xlibs-dev, because there
> is no actual direct dependency.
That's fine.  Please go ahead.

- -Mike

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDyTLc7ZPKKRJLJvMRAhv6AJ4lvlLAS+r/olsRik9YLgL8Vv/cHwCgnNkQ
JU+OD43UsmVG5aNG9clAl8w=
=E4Om
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341508: marked as done (slony1_1.1.2-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: /usr/lib/postgresql/8.1/lib//plpgsql.so not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:29:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341508: slony1_1.1.2-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: 
/usr/lib/postgresql/8.1/lib//plpgsql.so not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2005 02:38:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 18:38:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de ([213.133.98.126])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EheL7-0005tM-Ui
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:38:30 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EheL2-0004BP-Kn
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 03:38:24 +0100
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 03:38:24 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: slony1_1.1.2-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: 
/usr/lib/postgresql/8.1/lib//plpgsql.so not found
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: slony1
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

your package fails to build from source due to a failing configure
check:

| Automatic build of slony1_1.1.2-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051130-1744
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading Package Lists...
| Building Dependency Tree...
| Need to get 638kB of source archives.
| Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main slony1 1.1.2-1 (dsc) 
[756B]
| Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main slony1 1.1.2-1 (tar) 
[632kB]
| Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main slony1 1.1.2-1 (diff) 
[5448B]
| Fetched 638kB in 0s (2102kB/s)
| Download complete and in download only mode
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), bison, docbook (>= 4.2), 
docbook2x, docbook-dsssl, flex, groff, gs-gpl, libjpeg-progs, libpq-dev, 
netpbm, openjade, opensp, postgresql-server-dev-8.0
[...]
| checking build system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking host system type... sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
| checking which template to use... linux
| configure: using CFLAGS=-g -Wall -O2
| checking for gcc... cc
| checking for C compiler default output... a.out
| checking whether the C compiler works... yes
| checking whether we are cross compiling... no
| checking for suffix of executables... 
| checking for suffix of object files... o
| checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
| checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
| checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld
| checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
| checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl
| checking for tar... /bin/tar
| checking for flex... flex
| checking for bison... bison -y
| checking for sed... sed
| checking for the pthreads library -lpthreads... no
| checking whether pthreads work without any flags... no
| checking whether pthreads work with -Kthread... no
| checking whether pthreads work with -kthread... no
| checking for the pthreads library -llthread... no
| checking whether pthreads work with -pthread... yes
| checking for joinable pthread attribute... PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE
| checking if more special flags are required for pthreads... no
| checking for cc_r... cc
| checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E
| checking for ANSI C header files... yes
| checking for sys/types.h... yes
| checking for sys/stat.h... yes
| checking for stdlib.h... yes
| checking for string.h... yes
| checking for memory.h... yes
| checking for strings.h... yes
| checking for inttypes.h... yes
| checking for stdint.h... yes
| checking for unistd.h... yes
| checking fcntl.h usability... yes
| checking fcntl.h presence... yes
| checking for fcntl.h... yes
| checking limits.h usability... yes
| checking limits.h presence... yes
| checking for limits.h... yes
| checking stddef.h usability... yes
| checking stddef.h presence... yes
| checking for stddef.h... yes
| checking sys/socket.h usability... yes
| checki

Bug#346870: xxgdb status

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Just a note:

I'm perfectly aware of this easy issue. I'll do not upload a new version
because while patching for using UNIX98 pts and so squashing all other
reports, I discover a major issue with the I/O Window which causes
the program to freeze, also with current version. I would prefer take
this program off etch 'til solved, which could be not so immediate,
due to lack of upstream.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347066: patch

[Bart Martens]

package synergy
tags 347066 patch
thanks


The attached patch should fix this bug.  I've verified the result with
pbuilder and piuparts.

diff -ru synergy-1.2.2-debianorig/debian/control synergy-1.2.2/debian/control
--- synergy-1.2.2-debianorig/debian/control 2006-01-14 16:02:15.0 
+0100
+++ synergy-1.2.2/debian/control2006-01-14 18:15:54.0 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Daniel Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), xlibs-dev, docbook-to-man
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), docbook-to-man, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, 
libxinerama-dev, libxtst-dev, x-dev, xutils
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: synergy

Processed: patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package synergy
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: synergy

> tags 347066 patch
Bug#347066: synergy: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346640: marked as done (ascd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:32:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346640: fixed in ascd 0.13.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:33 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvlzU-lR-33
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:33 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlyy-0006ib-Oq
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:00 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ascd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:00 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ascd
Version: 0.13.2-3
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 17:40:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 09:40:34 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExpG3-0005AW-AC; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:32:07 -0800
From: Fredrik Hallenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346640: fixed in ascd 0.13.2-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:32:07 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ascd
Source-Version: 0.13.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ascd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ascd_0.13.2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/ascd/ascd_0.13.2-4.diff.gz
ascd_0.13.2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/a/ascd/ascd_0.13.2-4.dsc
ascd_0.13.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/ascd/ascd_0.13.2-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have

Processed: ubuntu has a new upstream which fixes many RC bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 327934 patch
Bug#327934: boson-base: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch

> tags 264883 patch
Bug#264883: boson-base: FTBFS: g++ compile error: BosonPlayFieldView undefined
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 331088 patch
Bug#331088: FTBFS: mMutex_ not declared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 335118 patch
Bug#335118: removal of automake1.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 348024 patch
Bug#348024: boson-base 0.11 is out
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#346647: marked as done (coolmail: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346647: fixed in coolmail 1.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:34 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvlzU-n2-UQ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:34 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
  id 1Evlyz-0006k9-OV
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: coolmail: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: coolmail
Version: 1.3-7
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org


---
Received: (at 346647-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 17:50:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 09:50:42 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExpUe-0005zk-3o; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:47:12 -0800
From: Fredrik Hallenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346647: fixed in coolmail 1.3-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: coolmail
Source-Version: 1.3-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
coolmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

coolmail_1.3-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/coolmail/coolmail_1.3-8.diff.gz
coolmail_1.3-8.dsc
  to pool/main/c/coolmail/coolmail_1.3-8.dsc
coolmail_1.3-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/coolmail/coolmail_1.3-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which wi

Bug#346592: will NMU per 0-day policy

[Thomas Viehmann]

OK, so I NMU to rectify this.
Gürkan, I'm sorry for getting this wrong the first time.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
diff -u ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
--- ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
+++ ocp-0.1.9/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+ocp (0.1.9-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload, adding libxext-dev, x-dev to not rely
+on indirect dependencies.
+
+ -- Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:32:04 +0100
+
+ocp (0.1.9-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * NMU for x-window-system-dev/xlibs-dev removal. Closes: #346592.
+Thanks to Justin Pryzby for calculating the necessary change.
+
+ -- Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:58:30 +0100
+
 ocp (0.1.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fix build-depends for doc, add texinfo.
diff -u ocp-0.1.9/debian/control ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
--- ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
+++ ocp-0.1.9/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: sound
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, zlib1g-dev, 
libncurses5-dev, libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, libsidplay1-dev, libx11-dev, 
x-window-system-dev | xlibs-dev, texi2html, libadplug-dev, libxxf86dga-dev, 
libxxf86vm-dev, texinfo
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libmad0-dev, libid3tag0-dev, zlib1g-dev, 
libncurses5-dev, libogg-dev, libvorbis-dev, libsidplay1-dev, libx11-dev, 
texi2html, libadplug-dev, libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, texinfo, 
libxext-dev, x-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: opencubicplayer