Bug#389681: Bug#399706: Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-11-21 Thread akira yamada
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
 Please follow up this discussion in 399706.  I agree Ruby is stupid
 here, but I don't intend to work around it.

I don't think so.

It is not a bug of Ruby and it is bug of apt-listbugs.
I think that the behaviour is intended by the upstream author of SOAP4r.

The current author of apt-listbugs should ask the upstream
or correct his code.

-- 
ay

P.S. I will reassign the bug to apt-listbugs later.
Please reassign the bug to libruby1.8
if you ask the upstream and the upstream changes the code.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-25 Thread Uwe Storbeck
Hi Junichi,

version 0.0.63 does the job with the proxy for me. Good work!

But apt-listbugs now reclaims about http_proxy is set and aborts,
which is not nice:

# apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:395:in `parse_options': E: sanity check failed: 
environment variable http_proxy is set and soap_use_proxy is not 'on'. 
(RuntimeError)
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1308
# unset http_proxy
# apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:392:in `parse_options': E: sanity check failed: 
environment variable http_proxy is unset and HTTP_PROXY is set. (RuntimeError)
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1308
..

If there is a switch to control if apt-listbugs reads the
HTTP_PROXY setting from the environment or not it should read it
if it is set and not read it if it is not set. But it is not the
job of apt-listbugs to gripe about a set HTTP_PROXY variable in
the environment if SOAP_USE_PROXY is not set.
BTW: A somewhat consistent handling of the proxy usage within
the apt family would not be bad ;-).

And .. there are really enough environment variables. We do not need
yet another environment variable for every program. apt-listbugs has
a config file, so why not use it for the SOAP_USE_PROXY switch?

Regards,

Uwe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-25 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi,


 But apt-listbugs now reclaims about http_proxy is set and aborts,
 which is not nice:
 
 # apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
 /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:395:in `parse_options': E: sanity check failed: 
 environment variable http_proxy is set and soap_use_proxy is not 'on'. 
 (RuntimeError)
 from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1308
 # unset http_proxy
 # apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs
 /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:392:in `parse_options': E: sanity check failed: 
 environment variable http_proxy is unset and HTTP_PROXY is set. (RuntimeError)
 from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1308
 ..
 
 If there is a switch to control if apt-listbugs reads the
 HTTP_PROXY setting from the environment or not it should read it
 if it is set and not read it if it is not set. But it is not the
 job of apt-listbugs to gripe about a set HTTP_PROXY variable in
 the environment if SOAP_USE_PROXY is not set.
 BTW: A somewhat consistent handling of the proxy usage within
 the apt family would not be bad ;-).

Better than having everyone filing grave bugs saying 'this does not
work as expected'

proxy configuration is set in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/XXX. It should be
consistent with APT.

Why do you set HTTP_PROXY and not http_proxy? This is a safeguard
check against users griping about 'HTTP_PROXY is set but apt-listbugs
does not work'

 
 And .. there are really enough environment variables. We do not need
 yet another environment variable for every program. apt-listbugs has
 a config file, so why not use it for the SOAP_USE_PROXY switch?

SOAP_USE_PROXY is a safeguard set by ruby upstream. 


regards,
junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-06 Thread Uwe Storbeck
Hi

On Oct 06, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

 Have you read the manpage? 

No, at least not the one from the new version :).
I just have done it ...

 If you have configured proxy in your apt.conf, you don't need to think
 about it, but If you are configuring your proxy with HTTP_PROXY
 variable set, you need to set SOAP_USE_PROXY=on.

It is configured in apt.conf and works with .48 (the problem with .48 is
gone, seemed indeed to be a server problem). If there is no change in
the config options it should also work with .58:

  Acquire
  {
http
{
  Proxy http://http-proxy:8080/;;
  Max-Age 3600;
  Dl-Limit 128;
};
  }

 .48 and .58 have very different architecture and use completely
 different servers. They aren't related.

Good to know.

Regards,

Uwe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi,

  Have you read the manpage? 
 
 No, at least not the one from the new version :).
 I just have done it ...
 
  If you have configured proxy in your apt.conf, you don't need to think
  about it, but If you are configuring your proxy with HTTP_PROXY
  variable set, you need to set SOAP_USE_PROXY=on.
 
 It is configured in apt.conf and works with .48 (the problem with .48 is
 gone, seemed indeed to be a server problem). If there is no change in
 the config options it should also work with .58:
 
   Acquire
   {
 http
 {
   Proxy http://http-proxy:8080/;;
   Max-Age 3600;
   Dl-Limit 128;
 };
   }
 

And, are you experiencing that it doesn't work?

Could you try to reproduce with

/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs  -d 

and 

ls -1 /var/cache/apt/archives/PACKAGE_*.deb | /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt -d 
 (substitute PACKAGE with the package name)


and send me the debug output?

regards,
junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-06 Thread Uwe Storbeck
Hi

On Oct 06, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

 Could you try to reproduce with
 
   /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs  -d 

  # /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs -d
  http_proxy: http://http-proxy:8080/ : http-proxy 8080
  http://bugs.debian.org:80/
  indexdir = /indices/
  Reading package fields... Done
  Reading package status... Done
  Retrieving bug reports... 0%fetching /indices/index.db-critical.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-critical.gz... 
  getting /indices/index.db-critical.gz
fetch http://bugs.debian.org:80/indices/index.db-critical.gz
  Exception `EOFError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:133 - end of file 
reached
fetch http://merkel.debian.org/~dancer/apt-listbugs/index.db-critical.gz
  fetching /indices/index.db-grave.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-grave.gz... 
  getting /indices/index.db-grave.gz
fetch http://bugs.debian.org:80/indices/index.db-grave.gz
  Exception `EOFError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:133 - end of file 
reached
fetch http://merkel.debian.org/~dancer/apt-listbugs/index.db-grave.gz
  fetching /indices/index.db-serious.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-serious.gz... 
  getting /indices/index.db-serious.gz
fetch http://bugs.debian.org:80/indices/index.db-serious.gz
  Exception `EOFError' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/net/protocol.rb:133 - end of file 
reached
fetch http://merkel.debian.org/~dancer/apt-listbugs/index.db-serious.gz
  fetching 326008 381350 389681 323626 334697.. 
  Wire dump:

  = Request

  ! CONNECT TO bugs.debian.org:80
  Exception `Errno::ENETUNREACH' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/http-access2.rb:1109 - 
Network is unreachable - connect(2)
  Exception `Errno::ENETUNREACH' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/http-access2.rb:1395 - 
Network is unreachable - connect(2) (bugs.debian.org, #80)
  Exception `Errno::ENETUNREACH' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/http-access2.rb:895 - 
Network is unreachable - connect(2) (bugs.debian.org, #80)
  Exception `Errno::ENETUNREACH' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/soap/streamHandler.rb:184 
- Network is unreachable - connect(2) (bugs.debian.org, #80)
   Exception: Errno::ENETUNREACH
  Exception `LocalJumpError' at /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1050 - no block given
   ... E: no block given


Looks like there is your problem. It tries to make a direct connection
to bugs.debian.org.


 ls -1 /var/cache/apt/archives/PACKAGE_*.deb | /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt -d 
  (substitute PACKAGE with the package name)

  # echo /var/cache/apt/archives/recover_1.3c-11_i386.deb | 
/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt -d
  http_proxy: http://http-proxy:8080/ : http-proxy 8080
  http://bugs.debian.org:80/
  indexdir = /indices/
  Reading package fields... Done
  Reading package status... Done
  Retrieving bug reports... 0%fetching /indices/index.db-critical.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-critical.gz... 
  fetching /indices/index.db-grave.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-grave.gz... 
  fetching /indices/index.db-serious.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-serious.gz... 
  No bugs to fetch
  Retrieving bug reports... Done
  Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
  grappa:/home/uwe# echo 
/var/cache/apt/archives/mozilla-browser_2%3a1.7.13-0.3_i386.deb | 
/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt -d
  http_proxy: http://http-proxy:8080/ : http-proxy 8080
  http://bugs.debian.org:80/
  indexdir = /indices/
  Reading package fields... Done
  Reading package status... Done
  Retrieving bug reports... 0%fetching /indices/index.db-critical.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-critical.gz... 
  fetching /indices/index.db-grave.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-grave.gz... 
  fetching /indices/index.db-serious.gz.. 
  Reading /indices/index.db-serious.gz... 
  fetching 318062 321644 327550 336441 340282 318723.. 
  Wire dump:

  = Request

  ! CONNECT TO bugs.debian.org:80
  Exception `Errno::ENETUNREACH' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/http-access2.rb:1109 - 
Network is unreachable - connect(2)
  Exception `Errno::ENETUNREACH' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/http-access2.rb:1395 - 
Network is unreachable - connect(2) (bugs.debian.org, #80)
  Exception `Errno::ENETUNREACH' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/http-access2.rb:895 - 
Network is unreachable - connect(2) (bugs.debian.org, #80)
  Exception `Errno::ENETUNREACH' at /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/soap/streamHandler.rb:184 
- Network is unreachable - connect(2) (bugs.debian.org, #80)
   Exception: Errno::ENETUNREACH
  Exception `LocalJumpError' at /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1050 - no block given
   ... E: no block given


Same here, direct connection.

Regards,

Uwe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
found 389681 0.0.59
thanks


Hi,

 
  Could you try to reproduce with
  
  /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs list apt-listbugs  -d 
 
 
 Same here, direct connection.

Thanks, there was a bug in initialization path that made SOAP
processing ignore apt.conf proxy configuration.
Should be fixed in 0.0.60.

For the time-being you can set SOAP_USE_PROXY=on in your envvar to
workaround.

regards,
junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 found 389681 0.0.59
Bug#389681: Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or 
method `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
Bug marked as found in version 0.0.59.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-05 Thread Uwe Storbeck
Hi

On Oct 04, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

 .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.

This is what I get with .58 installed:

# apt-get upgrade
[..]
35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives.
After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: no block given
E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; 
then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: 
apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 ; read a  
/dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10)
E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 
; read a  /dev/tty ); fi


But this time I also got an error with .48.
Maybe there is a different problem now (with the server)?

# apt-get install apt-listbugs
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following held packages will be changed:
   apt-listbugs (0.0.48 = 0.0.58)
The following packages will be upgraded:
   apt-listbugs (0.0.48 = 0.0.58)
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 41 not upgraded.
Need to get 80.8kB of archives.
After unpacking 57.3kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Get:1 http://mirror.switch.ch sid/main apt-listbugs 0.0.58 [80.8kB]
Fetched 80.8kB in 0s (102kB/s)   
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% [0/1]/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:54:in 
`rbuf_fill': execution expired (Timeout::Error)
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1109:in `join'
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1109:in `create'
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1108:in `each'
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1108:in `create'
from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1356
Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.

Reading changelogs... Done
apt-listchanges: Do you want to continue? [Y/n]? 


Regards,

Uwe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-05 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi,

  .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.
 
 This is what I get with .58 installed:
 
 # apt-get upgrade
 [..]
 35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
 Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives.
 After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space will be used.
 Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
 Reading package fields... Done
 Reading package status... Done
 Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: no block given
 E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; 
 then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 
 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 ; 
 read a  /dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10)
 E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
 installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
 echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 
 12 ; read a  /dev/tty ); fi

Have you read the manpage? 

If you have configured proxy in your apt.conf, you don't need to think
about it, but If you are configuring your proxy with HTTP_PROXY
variable set, you need to set SOAP_USE_PROXY=on.

 But this time I also got an error with .48.
 Maybe there is a different problem now (with the server)?

.48 and .58 have very different architecture and use completely
different servers. They aren't related.



regards,
junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-04 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi,

 If the network connection does matter in any way: I have to use a
 http-proxy here, the network has no direct routing to the internet.

.58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.


regasrds,
junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-02 Thread Uwe Storbeck
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681

This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:

  Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method `pkg' 
for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
  E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; 
then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: 
apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 ; read a  
/dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10)
  E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 
; read a  /dev/tty ); fi
  
Even worse I get a warning from reportbug about a newer version than
that in Debian:

  Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
  Your version of apt-listbugs (0.0.57) is newer than that in Debian! Do you
  still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?

I use mirror.switch.ch:

  # apt-cache policy apt-listbugs
  apt-listbugs:
Installed: 0.0.57
Candidate: 0.0.57
Version table:
   *** 0.0.57 0
  650 http://mirror.switch.ch sid/main Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

A check of the Packages.bz2 file shows the entry for version 0.0.57
(http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2):

  Package: apt-listbugs
  Priority: optional
  Section: admin
  Installed-Size: 408
  Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Architecture: all
  Version: 0.0.57
  Depends: ruby (= 1.8), libruby1.8 (= 1.8.1), libdpkg-ruby1.8, apt, 
libzlib-rub
  y1.8, libintl-gettext-ruby1.8, libxml-parser-ruby1.8, libhttp-access2-ruby1.8
  Suggests: reportbug, debianutils (= 2.0) | www-browser | w3m
  Filename: pool/main/a/apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs_0.0.57_all.deb
  Size: 79844
  MD5sum: 14ee257dce34a12cdfc3bc52c70fa046
  SHA1: 0d0629be4a583bf9a50262470355187225f803ae
  SHA256: 2499c3b75e081347642564c60bd6aad7bd811f4c252a42565de7250084163069
  Description: Lists critical bugs before each apt installation
   apt-listbugs is a tool which retrieves bug reports from the Debian Bug
   Tracking System and lists them. Especially, it is intended to be invoked
   before each upgrade/installation by apt in order to check whether the
   upgrade/installation is safe.
   .
   Many developers and users prefer the unstable version of Debian for its new
   features and packages.  apt, the usual upgrade tool, can break your system by
   installing a buggy package.
   .
   apt-listbugs lists critical bug reports from the Debian Bug Tracking System.
   Run it before apt to see if an upgrade or installation is known to be unsafe.
  Tag: admin::package-management, interface::commandline, made-of::lang:ruby, 
prot
  ocol::http, role::sw:utility, suite::debian, works-with::bugs, 
works-with::softw
  are:package


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (750, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii  apt   0.6.46 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libdpkg-ruby1.8   0.3.2  modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii  libhttp-access2-ruby1.8   2.0.6-1HTTP accessing library for ruby
ii  libintl-gettext-ruby1.8   0.11-8 Gettext wrapper for Ruby 1.8
ii  libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8]  1.8.5-2Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-2Interface of expat for the scripti
ii  ruby  1.8.2-1An interpreter of object-oriented 

apt-listbugs recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-02 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi,

 Package: apt-listbugs
 Version: 0.0.57
 Followup-For: Bug #389681
 
 This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:
 
   Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method 
 `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
   E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
 installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
 echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 
 12 ; read a  /dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10)
   E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
 installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
 echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 
 12 ; read a  /dev/tty ); fi

Could you reproduce a full screen log for the apt session? Which
package you tried to install, etc.

   
 Even worse I get a warning from reportbug about a newer version than
 that in Debian:
 
   Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
   Your version of apt-listbugs (0.0.57) is newer than that in Debian! Do you
   still want to file a report [y|N|q|?]?

That I think it a problem in reportbug, if you want that handled,
please file a different bug.


regards,
junichi
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-02 Thread Daniel Leidert (dale)
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681

Ditto here:

Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method
`pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Unterprozess if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit
10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to
continue.' 12 ; read a  /dev/tty ); fi ist mit einem Fehlercode
zurückgekehrt (10)
E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .*
ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 ||
exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to
continue.' 12 ; read a  /dev/tty ); fi

The connection was very slow, so it maybe ran into a timeout. A second
try did work.

Regards, Daniel


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (550, 'stable'), (110, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.09060920
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on:
ii  apt   0.6.46 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  libdpkg-ruby1.8   0.3.2  modules/classes for dpkg on ruby 1
ii  libhttp-access2-ruby1.8   2.0.6-1HTTP accessing library for ruby
ii  libintl-gettext-ruby1.8   0.11-8 Gettext wrapper for Ruby 1.8
ii  libruby1.8 [libzlib-ruby1.8]  1.8.5-2Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii  libxml-parser-ruby1.8 0.6.8-2Interface of expat for the scripti
ii  ruby  1.8.2-1An interpreter of object-oriented 

apt-listbugs recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-02 Thread Uwe Storbeck
Hi

On Oct 03, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

 Could you reproduce a full screen log for the apt session? Which
 package you tried to install, etc.

# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
   freeguide (0.8.6-1 = 0.10.4-1)
   gdal-bin (1.3.1-6 = 1.3.2-2)
   gedit (2.14.3-1 = 2.14.4-2)
   gedit-common (2.14.3-1 = 2.14.4-2)
   grass (6.0.2-2.1 = 6.0.2-6)
   hugin (0.6.1-0.0 = 0.6.1-1)
   kstars (3.5.4-1 = 3.5.4-2)
   libqgis0 (0.7.4-4.1 = 0.7.4-5)
   linux-image-2.6-k7 (2.6.16+0.2 = 2.6.17+2)
   mozilla-plugin-vlc (0.8.6-svn20060823.debian-3 = 0.8.6-svn20060925.debian-1)
   mpg123 (0.59r-22 = 0.60-2)
   nfs-common (1.0.9-10 = 1.0.10-1)
   nfs-kernel-server (1.0.9-10 = 1.0.10-1)
   nvidia-glx (1.0.8762-2 = 1.0.8774-3)
   qgis (0.7.4-4.1 = 0.7.4-5)
   qgis-plugin-grass (0.7.4-4.1 = 0.7.4-5)
   vlc (0.8.6-svn20060823.debian-3 = 0.8.6-svn20060925.debian-1)
   vlc-plugin-arts (0.8.6-svn20060823.debian-3 = 0.8.6-svn20060925.debian-1)
   vlc-plugin-sdl (0.8.6-svn20060823.debian-3 = 0.8.6-svn20060925.debian-1)
The following packages will be upgraded:
   ecj-bootstrap (3.1.2-6 = 3.2-3)
   java-gcj-compat (1.0.56-2 = 1.0.65-2)
2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 19 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/1113kB of archives.
After unpacking 123kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method `pkg' 
for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; 
then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: 
apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 ; read a  
/dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10)
E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 
; read a  /dev/tty ); fi


I also tried it with version 0.0.56 and 0.0.55, both with the same error.
Version 0.0.48 works.

Regards,

Uwe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Bug still exists in version 0.0.57

2006-10-02 Thread Uwe Storbeck
If the network connection does matter in any way: I have to use a
http-proxy here, the network has no direct routing to the internet.

Regards,

Uwe



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]