Bug#418995: SVN texlive (new) commit: r2684 - in texlive-new/trunk: all/debian texlive-base/debian texlive-bin/debian texlive-lang/debian
tags 418993 moreinfo tags 418994 moreinfo tags 418995 moreinfo thanks Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: preining > Date: 2007-04-13 08:51:07 + (Fri, 13 Apr 2007) > New Revision: 2684 > > Modified: >texlive-new/trunk/all/debian/tpm2deb.cfg >texlive-new/trunk/texlive-base/debian/changelog >texlive-new/trunk/texlive-bin/debian/changelog >texlive-new/trunk/texlive-lang/debian/changelog > Log: > add various replaces, closes: 418993 418994 418995 I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007), tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007) Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like Versions of packages texlive-font-utils depends on: ii libc6 2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries pn texlive-base (no description available) pn texlive-common (no description available) On a normal install, apt-get or aptitude will first install tl-common before trying any of the packages Rene reported about, and this will remove tetex-bin except for the empty transitional package. By the way I've tried this long ago... So either something else is going wrong, or Rene used some --force-foo Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Bug#418995: SVN texlive (new) commit: r2684 - in texlive-new/trunk: all/debian texlive-base/debian texlive-bin/debian texlive-lang/debian
Hi, Frank Küster wrote: > I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have > > conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007), > tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007) > > Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like > > Versions of packages texlive-font-utils depends on: > ii libc6 2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries > pn texlive-base (no description available) > pn texlive-common (no description available) > > On a normal install, apt-get or aptitude will first install tl-common > before trying any of the packages Rene reported about, and this will it didn't. > remove tetex-bin except for the empty transitional package. By the way it didn't. On the seconf try continuing the upgrade it did, yes,but not at the first run. > I've tried this long ago... > > So either something else is going wrong, or Rene used some --force-foo Just a plain upgrade out of aptitudes UI. And no, I didn't use any --force foo. I wouldn't have reported a bug if I had. Gr��e/Regards, Ren� -- .''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#418995: SVN texlive (new) commit: r2684 - in texlive-new/trunk: all/debian texlive-base/debian texlive-bin/debian texlive-lang/debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: > > I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have > > > > conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007), > > tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007) > > > > Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like > > > > Versions of packages texlive-font-utils depends on: > > ii libc6 2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries FWIW, this was upgraded in this same dist-upgrade run. I see that the texlive binaries for ppc already picked up a dep on libc6 >= 2.5, maybe that has something to do with it? > > On a normal install, apt-get or aptitude will first install tl-common > > before trying any of the packages Rene reported about, and this will > > it didn't. [...] > it didn't. On the seconf try continuing the upgrade it did, yes,but not > at the first run. > > > I've tried this long ago... Not to mention the behaviour is non-deterministic. I've seen that often that it did a specific order on system A and another one on B. Gr??e/Regards, Ren? - -- .''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGH1ot+FmQsCSK63MRAnPSAJ0Xn8V3gE1p2u80H2pVFZs0n3AKxQCfRRla 7ljw3rAX55J4BOKd98f5srE= =b+j/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
