Bug#783374: last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system)
On Fri, 2015-05-01 05:05:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Control: tag -1 - patch
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
The one before which is in jessie works fine.
I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix
gparted needs a newer udisks2, see #782838. Proposed patch attached.
diff -Nru gparted-0.19.0/debian/control gparted-0.19.0/debian/control
--- gparted-0.19.0/debian/control2014-06-11 14:50:55.0 +
+++ gparted-0.19.0/debian/control2015-04-26 16:02:28.0 +
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Package: gparted
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, udisks2 (= 2.1.5-1)
Suggests: xfsprogs, reiserfsprogs, reiser4progs, jfsutils, ntfs-3g,
dosfstools, mtools, yelp, kpartx, dmraid, dmsetup, gpart
Description: GNOME partition editor
As pointed out in #783397 this fix is incorrect. The correct fix is to
use a Breaks, so that there's no unnecessary Depends introduced.
Thanks,
Guillem
Hello Guillem,
Just to clarify this. ;)
I agree there is no need for an unnecessary dependency.
As I can see, gparted doesn't break udisks2.
Do you mean to add
Breaks: udisks2 ( 2.1.5)
to gparted's debian/control?
Regards,
Aníbal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#783374: last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system)
Hi!
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 19:51:57 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 05:05:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Control: tag -1 - patch
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
The one before which is in jessie works fine.
I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix
gparted needs a newer udisks2, see #782838. Proposed patch attached.
diff -Nru gparted-0.19.0/debian/control gparted-0.19.0/debian/control
--- gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2014-06-11 14:50:55.0 +
+++ gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2015-04-26 16:02:28.0 +
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Package: gparted
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, udisks2 (= 2.1.5-1)
Suggests: xfsprogs, reiserfsprogs, reiser4progs, jfsutils, ntfs-3g,
dosfstools, mtools, yelp, kpartx, dmraid, dmsetup, gpart
Description: GNOME partition editor
As pointed out in #783397 this fix is incorrect. The correct fix is to
use a Breaks, so that there's no unnecessary Depends introduced.
As I can see, gparted doesn't break udisks2.
It seems to break in combination with older udisks2.
Do you mean to add
Breaks: udisks2 ( 2.1.5)
to gparted's debian/control?
Yes.
Thanks,
Guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#783374: last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system)
Processing control commands: tag -1 - patch Bug #783374 [gparted] last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system) Removed tag(s) patch. -- 783374: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783374 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#783374: last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system)
Control: tag -1 - patch
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely
The one before which is in jessie works fine.
I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix
gparted needs a newer udisks2, see #782838. Proposed patch attached.
diff -Nru gparted-0.19.0/debian/control gparted-0.19.0/debian/control
--- gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2014-06-11 14:50:55.0 +
+++ gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2015-04-26 16:02:28.0 +
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
Package: gparted
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, udisks2 (= 2.1.5-1)
Suggests: xfsprogs, reiserfsprogs, reiser4progs, jfsutils, ntfs-3g,
dosfstools, mtools, yelp, kpartx, dmraid, dmsetup, gpart
Description: GNOME partition editor
As pointed out in #783397 this fix is incorrect. The correct fix is to
use a Breaks, so that there's no unnecessary Depends introduced.
Thanks,
Guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#783374: last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system)
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 12:09:16 -0400 Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: control: tag -1 confirmed control: severity -1 serious On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote: Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely The one before which is in jessie works fine. I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix gparted needs a newer udisks2, see #782838. Proposed patch attached. Best wishes, Mike Thanks for the quick answer. Now it works. Didn't see that bug cause it's already marked done. So the affects doestn't show it in gparted bug list. Just saw the new udisks2 is now uploaded to unstable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#783374: last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system)
Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #783374 [gparted] last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system) Added tag(s) confirmed. severity -1 serious Bug #783374 [gparted] last NMU patch breaks gparted completely (on my system) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 783374: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783374 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
