Re: Bug#358625: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
Hello listmasters, I believe that we have settled all the issues regarding the request for creation of debian-kernel-devel. In spite of that, no comments from listmasters have been received since April 17th, and no visible action has been taken. Is there still some kind of showstopper? Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#358625: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben: what about that? debian-devel-kernel@ I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-). I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the mbox names nicely together. :-) :-) debian-kernel-maint? on second thought, we run in the problem that Debian these days supports more than one kernel, which already lead to changes of package names. Yours, Cord, Debian Listmaster of the day -- http://lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#358625: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote: Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben: what about that? debian-devel-kernel@ I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-). I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the mbox names nicely together. :-) :-) debian-kernel-maint? debian-kernel-bugs ? If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy be confusing. on second thought, we run in the problem that Debian these days supports more than one kernel, which already lead to changes of package names. Well; the idea was that this list was open to all debian kernels, not just the linux ones. This didn'r really happen though, but i think it is still true. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#358625: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
Sven Luther wrote: On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote: Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben: what about that? debian-devel-kernel@ I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-). I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the mbox names nicely together. :-) :-) debian-kernel-maint? debian-kernel-bugs ? If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy be confusing. The point is to *keep* d-k the bug report list instead of trying to re-route the bug reports for all kernels released ever. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Jurij Smakov wrote: Hi, Cord Beerman wrote: what about that? debian-devel-kernel@ Cord I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-). I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the mbox names nicely together. :-) Thiemo thirded but i agree that anyway we'll be happy with the new list. :) -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#358625: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:52:27PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: debian-kernel-bugs ? If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy be confusing. The point is to *keep* d-k the bug report list instead of trying to re-route the bug reports for all kernels released ever. A good point, still i worry, debian-kernel doesn't sound like a bug mailing list, so newcomers may be surprised. Maybe start using debian-kernel-bugs and debian-kernel-devel, and let debian-kernel become unused (and redirect it to debian-kernel-bugs or something. On the other hand, maybe we should just promote proper procmail rules to filter out bug reports :) Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#358625: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Sven Luther wrote: A good point, still i worry, debian-kernel doesn't sound like a bug mailing list, so newcomers may be surprised. It is not intended as a bug-only mailing list. d-k will still remain a primary point of contact for the kernel team for users. And discussions on d-k-devel are not going to be of much interest to anyone outside the kernel team. Maybe start using debian-kernel-bugs and debian-kernel-devel, and let debian-kernel become unused (and redirect it to debian-kernel-bugs or something. Please do not make it more complicated than necessary. The current setup is fine, we just need a list with a bit less traffic to discuss the development issues. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
Hi, Cord Beerman wrote: what about that? debian-devel-kernel@ Cord I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-). Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Kernel Team Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-kernel-devel or debian-devel-kernel?
Jurij Smakov wrote: Hi, Cord Beerman wrote: what about that? debian-devel-kernel@ Cord I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-). I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the mbox names nicely together. :-) Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
