Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
Hi, 2010/11/4 Iker Salmón San Millán : > first i have to rename the ITP and i've been looking how to do it but i > haven't found. Please read: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control In short, write something like this to cont...@b.d.o: retitle 1234 RFP: My package here thanks You might want to set yourself as the owner of the bug entry as well if you aren't the owner. Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=utowguhgivca2=6zj9s_mj6jhz8gs=dyy5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
I have uploaded a new package, but there are a couple of issues. first i have to rename the ITP and i've been looking how to do it but i haven't found. The second thing is that i get an error that anthony (author) can't reproduce it. The program works well but there is kind of issue with the launcher and kick off (it saids tha KDEinit couldn't launch the program but the program starts). I have a patch ready and sent to the author but i want to wait till he reproduces the error and supervise the patch. Here is the new package if someone want to make a review: The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wicd-kde - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wicd-kde/wicd-kde_0.2.1-1.dsc And if someone cand help me finding a link to something to read about how to rename the ITP bug it would be grate Thanks Iker 2010/11/3 David Paleino > On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:29:00 +0100, Anthony Vital wrote: > > > [..] > > Put it that way, it indeed makes more sense to call the binary wicd-kde. > So > > I can do that upstream, but I haven't planned a new release anytime soon > > because I just released a new one a couple of days ago. But if needed, I > can > > make a patch and Iker could use it? > > Sure, not a problem. > > I'll wait for a new package from Iker :-) > > Kindly, > David > > -- > . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino > : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ > `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal > `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 >
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
I don't know if you want a particular format for the patch, but here's one. Anthony rename_binary_wicd-kde.patch Description: Binary data
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:29:00 +0100, Anthony Vital wrote: > [..] > Put it that way, it indeed makes more sense to call the binary wicd-kde. So > I can do that upstream, but I haven't planned a new release anytime soon > because I just released a new one a couple of days ago. But if needed, I can > make a patch and Iker could use it? Sure, not a problem. I'll wait for a new package from Iker :-) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
2010/11/3 Anthony Vital > > Ah, I didn't know that. I've never even noticed there was a wicd-gtk > binary ;) > Put it that way, it indeed makes more sense to call the binary wicd-kde. So > I can do that upstream, but I haven't planned a new release anytime soon > because I just released a new one a couple of days ago. But if needed, I can > make a patch and Iker could use it? > > Anthony > No problem for me anthony I have addeed to the package the patchs i sent to you, so another one is not a problem for me. Iker
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
Hi, > The wicd-client binary is just a wrapper, that runs wicd-curses or > wicd-gtk, > depending on whether X is available or not. > > wicd-gtk is really a separate client, /usr/bin/wicd-gtk . > Also /usr/bin/wicd-curses is a client, and /usr/bin/wicd-cli is another. > I see /usr/bin/wicd-client-kde failing being consistent here :-) > Anthony, would it be possible for you to reconsider this decision, and call > it /usr/bin/wicd-kde? > Ah, I didn't know that. I've never even noticed there was a wicd-gtk binary ;) Put it that way, it indeed makes more sense to call the binary wicd-kde. So I can do that upstream, but I haven't planned a new release anytime soon because I just released a new one a couple of days ago. But if needed, I can make a patch and Iker could use it? Anthony
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:03:17 +0100, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > El 3 de noviembre de 2010 13:05, Iker Salmón San Millán > escribió: > > > I am still wainting upstream response about changing the name to wicd-qt, > > but till then i would be glad if someone makes a new review of the package. > > Here is the response: > >Well technically this is a KDE App, which heavily depends on the KDE libs, > not only on Qt, and is designed to integrate in the KDE >desktop. If you > call it wicd-qt, it might be misleading if someone doesn't want any kdelibs > dependencies for whatever reason. So I do >not recommend using wicd-qt for > the package name, but instead wicd-kde, like your potential mentor said, for > consistency. wicd-kde is fine then. > >About the binary name, I don't plan to change it to wicd-kde, because it > doesn't contains/substitute the wicd daemon, I think it's >important that > the users understand it's just a client for the daemon. > > >So the package wicd-gtk depends on gtk (and not GNOME) and provides the > wicd-client binary. The wicd-client binary is just a wrapper, that runs wicd-curses or wicd-gtk, depending on whether X is available or not. wicd-gtk is really a separate client, /usr/bin/wicd-gtk . Also /usr/bin/wicd-curses is a client, and /usr/bin/wicd-cli is another. I see /usr/bin/wicd-client-kde failing being consistent here :-) Anthony, would it be possible for you to reconsider this decision, and call it /usr/bin/wicd-kde? > That makes sense to me. I don't know what to do now. I have to correct the > description of the package just to make clear that not only depends on qt it > also depends on kdelibs Yes, please, correct the package description. Other than this, the package seemed fine to me earlier today. I'll have a more careful check as soon as the binary name issue is solved. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
El 3 de noviembre de 2010 13:05, Iker Salmón San Millán escribió: > > I am still wainting upstream response about changing the name to wicd-qt, > but till then i would be glad if someone makes a new review of the package. > > Here is the response: >Well technically this is a KDE App, which heavily depends on the KDE libs, not only on Qt, and is designed to integrate in the KDE >desktop. If you call it wicd-qt, it might be misleading if someone doesn't want any kdelibs dependencies for whatever reason. So I do >not recommend using wicd-qt for the package name, but instead wicd-kde, like your potential mentor said, for consistency. >About the binary name, I don't plan to change it to wicd-kde, because it doesn't contains/substitute the wicd daemon, I think it's >important that the users understand it's just a client for the daemon. >So the package wicd-gtk depends on gtk (and not GNOME) and provides the wicd-client binary. >And the package wicd-kde depends on kde (and not only Qt) and would provide the wicd-client-kde binary. (I can't call it wicd-client >obviously so I just add -kde at the end) That makes sense to me. I don't know what to do now. I have to correct the description of the package just to make clear that not only depends on qt it also depends on kdelibs Cheers Iker
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
Hi, 2010/11/3 Iker Salmón San Millán : > I also have a question. If we (me, mentors, sponsors, DD, upstream...) > finally decide to change the name i guess i should send a new itp bug with > the new name and close this one, shouldn't I? I believe you can just rename the ITP. Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik-yjwlv=mcsyoupp1zepuckgiy5mwjtcytk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
I've uploaded tha package again. I think i've corrected all the mistakes mentioned in previous emails. I've also added "provides: wicd-client" in debian/control. I am still wainting upstream response about changing the name to wicd-qt, but till then i would be glad if someone makes a new review of the package. I also have a question. If we (me, mentors, sponsors, DD, upstream...) finally decide to change the name i guess i should send a new itp bug with the new name and close this one, shouldn't I? Thanks, iker P.S. @David: I cc you because i don't know if you are subscribed to debian-mentors
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
2010/11/2 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud > Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > > > I've added manpage > > Nice, but not completely correct: it is named as a manpage for Qt: QT:(1), > etc. Please change that to wicd-client-kde. Corrected, > Furthermore, it seems to lack > your name as author of said manpage (and mentioning how you prepared it). > > But i am not pretty sure where tu put that > > there are so many troubles running network-manager-kde and wicd-daemon > > (actually a think they cannot run at the same time, i don't know why you > > can install both) > > > I think that the best option is to add conflicts with knm-runtime because > In fact, you can install both because there is no reason not to be able to. > > For now, I'd find this situation satisfactory, yet not ideal: icons should > be renamed on one side to avoid the conflict. > > There is a big issue with the icons thing, i'll quote the author's response: --- Unfortunately I can't do this, because I use the same name scheme as knm on purpose. Let me explain the situation: - That name scheme is the one used by monochromatic icons on KDE4.5.x. There is no way to have control over it. So if I want the application to use those monochromatic icons, I have to use that name scheme. Now the tricky part: - The monochromatic icon set is shipped in kdebase-runtime as part of the "Air" desktop theme. - network-wired.png (has to be used because is has a monochromatic equivalent) is shipped in oxygen-icons. - All the other icons are shipped with knm. To sum up: The monochromatic icons are meant to be used with one and only one icon (well at least one icon name), but monochromatic icons + normal icons are dispatched in 3 different kde "parts" (I don't know how I should call them), and one of this "parts" is an application on its own (knm), so not generic. I hope you understand my explaination ;) My plan was to get in touch with the knm guys eventually, to try to have all the icons in one place, but I haven't yet. But even if it happens, I doubt it will happen tomorrow, if you know what I mean... So i guess that the best option is to comunicate with kde-devel team to see if it's posible to provide those icons with oxygen-icon-theme instead that with knm-runtime. We'll see that. But now i just want to keep correcting the package and see if i can do something that it worths, so i'll keep conflicts: knm-runtime for the present time. > The patch you have made to fix the spelling errors still has some issues: > > * You should incorporate "DEP-3" headers to it. > * You are renaming the "informationsButton" object into > "informationButton". > Why that ? This will never appear in the GUI and will only be a source of > errors, no ? > * You changed "adress" for "address" in the english source and in all po's, > but it seems you made a quick "search and replace". This has the following > consequences: > - in french, you substituted "adresse" for "addresse", which is wrong > (french adresse has one 'd') > - You changed the "source translations" blindly (aka the translations are > not marked "fuzzy". How do you know that the non-plural form of > "Information" is translated the same in chinese as its plural form ? > > So I would say that both entagled part of the patch are wrong and I would > simply drop it: the code change is too risky and the i18n label change is > done too blindly. > > Everything fixed i think... I have upload the package again. I would be grate if someone could make another revision of it Thanks Iker P.S. i can't reproduce the error on "preferences" panel. It opens good for me. Can someone check that again?
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > Hello again, i've uploaded the package again and i hope that there will be > less errors this time Hrm, there is still one more error I forgot: I tested the program (always good to do) and the "Preferences" panel does not open. This should be checked/fixed. Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iaomb3$7l...@dough.gmane.org
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > Hello again, i've uploaded the package again and i hope that there will be > less errors this time. Hi, indeed there are less ! But still. :-) > I've added manpage Nice, but not completely correct: it is named as a manpage for Qt: QT:(1), etc. Please change that to wicd-client-kde. Furthermore, it seems to lack your name as author of said manpage (and mentioning how you prepared it). > i've corrected copyrigth Nice, DEP-5 ! > changelog Okay now ! > and build dependecies. Ditto, it compiles. :-> > I think that the best option is to add conflicts with knm-runtime because > there are so many troubles running network-manager-kde and wicd-daemon > (actually a think they cannot run at the same time, i don't know why you > can install both) In fact, you can install both because there is no reason not to be able to. For now, I'd find this situation satisfactory, yet not ideal: icons should be renamed on one side to avoid the conflict. > I would be very gatetful if someone could review my package again and tell > me something before i send a new request with "update package" in subject. The patch you have made to fix the spelling errors still has some issues: * You should incorporate "DEP-3" headers to it. * You are renaming the "informationsButton" object into "informationButton". Why that ? This will never appear in the GUI and will only be a source of errors, no ? * You changed "adress" for "address" in the english source and in all po's, but it seems you made a quick "search and replace". This has the following consequences: - in french, you substituted "adresse" for "addresse", which is wrong (french adresse has one 'd') - You changed the "source translations" blindly (aka the translations are not marked "fuzzy". How do you know that the non-plural form of "Information" is translated the same in chinese as its plural form ? So I would say that both entagled part of the patch are wrong and I would simply drop it: the code change is too risky and the i18n label change is done too blindly. Just convince upstream to release a fixed version. :-) Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iaolif$55...@dough.gmane.org
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
Hello again, i've uploaded the package again and i hope that there will be less errors this time I've added manpage, i've corrected copyrigth, changelog and build dependecies. I think that the best option is to add conflicts with knm-runtime because there are so many troubles running network-manager-kde and wicd-daemon (actually a think they cannot run at the same time, i don't know why you can install both) I would be very gatetful if someone could review my package again and tell me something before i send a new request with "update package" in subject. Cheers Iker
Fwd: RFS: wicd-client-kde
-- Mensaje reenviado -- De: Iker Salmón San Millán Fecha: 1 de noviembre de 2010 13:35 Asunto: Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde Para: Didier 'OdyX' Raboud 2010/11/1 Andreas Ronnquist > On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:30:07 +0100 > Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > > > Hi! > > I am not a DD, so I have no possiblity to upload any package, and I am > not familiar with KDE stuff - but anyway - > > Trying to build (pdebuild) this package I do get a warning for lacking > cmake_minimum_required, which probably isn't too serious: > > 8< > CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt: > No cmake_minimum_required command is present. A line of code such as > >cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8) > > should be added at the top of the file. The version specified may be > lower if you wish to support older CMake versions for this project. > For more information run "cmake --help-policy CMP". > This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. > 8< > > I didn't specify the version because the version already aviable in repositories is 2.8.2, because this package is for kde4 i tought i did not need to do it, but you are rigth, i'll fix it > What is worse, I get this too: > > 8< > CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindKDE4.cmake:58 (MESSAGE): > ERROR: Could not find KDE4 kde4-config > 8< > > Have you forgotten som build-depends on some KDE development package? > You are rigth, i've made so many tries that in this last one i forgot to add de dependencie, actually is kdebase-workspace-dev (this ones pulls up other dependencies needed > > I am very far from an expert on packaging (I am also in the process of > trying to get a package into Debian), but as I understand reviewing of > others packages is encouraged. > > best regards > -- > Andreas Rönnquist > > Thanks for the help 2010/11/1 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud > Hi Iker, and thanks for packaging this software! > > Preliminary notice: I am not a DD, so I will not be able to upload your > package. However, I think that my review can be of interest. > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > Maybe, but it doesn't build in a clean chroot: you miss at least > kdelibs-bin > (so using kdelibs5-dev as Build-Dependency would be good [and works]). Did > you build it in a clean chroot (with pbuilder or sbuild e.g.) before > uploading it to mentors.d.n ? > > Once I fixed that, I still had one lintian warning: > > already responsed that, i forgot to add kdebase-workspace-dev as build dependencie > W: wicd-client-kde: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/wicd-client-kde > > which should really be fixed (see help2man for example). > > Terrible mistake, I tried man wicd-gtk to see how it was (the funcionality is the same in both front-ends and i did not find de man page. I forgot that I uninstalled the gtk-client. I just tough that if wicd-gtk didn't have man page this one would'nt need one. Silly me... Anyway, working on that also > > Other things I noticed (randomly ordered) > > * Your debian/copyright is unusual as it doesn't quote the GPL license. > > I tried to do the rigth way, i'll have to see more copyrigth files to see what i've done bad. * You have a debian/patches subdirectory that contains direct changes to the > source: if you want to apply patches, you should really prepare real > patches > (quilt add; quilt edit; …). > > Yup, in this case i guess is better to correct the spelling things before dh_make. I'll also contact with Anthony to fix that in upstream. > * You are mis-using the Vcs-* fields in debian/control: those are not meant > to point the the "upstream" VCS, but to the packaging VCS. > > Thanks, i did not notice that > * This package would perfectly fit in the "KDE-Extras" team; did you > consider putting it under this umbrella ? > > done > * There is a typo in the description: "qt" should be "Qt". And if it is > really a "KDE" client, it should be labelled as such. > > * Your changelog contains two useless informations: the fact that it's your > first package and the two spelling errors you are fixing (without proper > patching, see above). For a first release, there is usually no need to > explain what you have done (a matter of taste). So if you want to mention > the spelling errors patch, you can, but you should mention that it is done > through patching. > > thanks again > * The packages ships the network-wireless-*.png icons, that are also in > knm- > runtime. So you would either need to conflict with knm-runtime
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wicd-client-kde". > > * Package name: wicd-client-kde > Version : 0.2.1-1 > Upstream Author : Anthony Vital > * URL : http://gitorious.org/wicd-client-kde > * License : GPL v3 > Section : kde > > It builds these binary packages: > wicd-client-kde - wired and wireless network manager - KDE client Hi Iker, and thanks for packaging this software! Preliminary notice: I am not a DD, so I will not be able to upload your package. However, I think that my review can be of interest. > The package appears to be lintian clean. Maybe, but it doesn't build in a clean chroot: you miss at least kdelibs-bin (so using kdelibs5-dev as Build-Dependency would be good [and works]). Did you build it in a clean chroot (with pbuilder or sbuild e.g.) before uploading it to mentors.d.n ? Once I fixed that, I still had one lintian warning: W: wicd-client-kde: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/wicd-client-kde which should really be fixed (see help2man for example). > The upload would fix these bugs: 602049 Other things I noticed (randomly ordered) * Your debian/copyright is unusual as it doesn't quote the GPL license. * You have a debian/patches subdirectory that contains direct changes to the source: if you want to apply patches, you should really prepare real patches (quilt add; quilt edit; …). * You are mis-using the Vcs-* fields in debian/control: those are not meant to point the the "upstream" VCS, but to the packaging VCS. * This package would perfectly fit in the "KDE-Extras" team; did you consider putting it under this umbrella ? * There is a typo in the description: "qt" should be "Qt". And if it is really a "KDE" client, it should be labelled as such. * Your changelog contains two useless informations: the fact that it's your first package and the two spelling errors you are fixing (without proper patching, see above). For a first release, there is usually no need to explain what you have done (a matter of taste). So if you want to mention the spelling errors patch, you can, but you should mention that it is done through patching. * The packages ships the network-wireless-*.png icons, that are also in knm- runtime. So you would either need to conflict with knm-runtime or convince their maintainers to ship said icons in a separate package that you could use too. By the way, this shows that the icons are probably duplicated from knm-runtime and this sucks (code/data duplication is never good). By the way, the oxygen-icon-theme package ships network-wireless-connected-*.png icons which could be used instead. Furthermore, those icons are shipped in the orig tarball as *.png, which is certainly not the "preferred form of modification". So far so good, you have already enough to do. :-) Looking forward for your fixed package ! Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iam7g3$9b...@dough.gmane.org
Re: RFS: wicd-client-kde
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:30:07 +0100 Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wicd-client-kde". > > * Package name: wicd-client-kde > Version : 0.2.1-1 > Upstream Author : Anthony Vital > * URL : http://gitorious.org/wicd-client-kde > * License : GPL v3 > Section : kde > > It builds these binary packages: > wicd-client-kde - wired and wireless network manager - KDE client > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 602049 > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: > > I am using this program since the first releases and works quite well. I > also want to start mantaining some packages and i think this package is a > good start for it. > I am in contact with the upstream author and he also would be glad to have > his program in debian oficial repositories and he is going to help me fixing > posibles bugs if appear. > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wicd-client-kde > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wicd-client-kde/wicd-client-kde_0.2.1-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards > Iker Salmón San Millán Hi! I am not a DD, so I have no possiblity to upload any package, and I am not familiar with KDE stuff - but anyway - Trying to build (pdebuild) this package I do get a warning for lacking cmake_minimum_required, which probably isn't too serious: 8< CMake Warning (dev) in CMakeLists.txt: No cmake_minimum_required command is present. A line of code such as cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8) should be added at the top of the file. The version specified may be lower if you wish to support older CMake versions for this project. For more information run "cmake --help-policy CMP". This warning is for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it. 8< What is worse, I get this too: 8< CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindKDE4.cmake:58 (MESSAGE): ERROR: Could not find KDE4 kde4-config 8< Have you forgotten som build-depends on some KDE development package? I am very far from an expert on packaging (I am also in the process of trying to get a package into Debian), but as I understand reviewing of others packages is encouraged. best regards -- Andreas Rönnquist -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101101121137.106c3c1b.gus...@gusnan.se
RFS: wicd-client-kde
Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wicd-client-kde". * Package name: wicd-client-kde Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Anthony Vital * URL : http://gitorious.org/wicd-client-kde * License : GPL v3 Section : kde It builds these binary packages: wicd-client-kde - wired and wireless network manager - KDE client The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 602049 My motivation for maintaining this package is: I am using this program since the first releases and works quite well. I also want to start mantaining some packages and i think this package is a good start for it. I am in contact with the upstream author and he also would be glad to have his program in debian oficial repositories and he is going to help me fixing posibles bugs if appear. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wicd-client-kde - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wicd-client-kde/wicd-client-kde_0.2.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Iker Salmón San Millán
