debian-installer build deps testing/unstable divergences
These are d-i build deps that provide files that go on d-i images, that currently have different versions in unstable and testing. The significance is that since rc2 will be built on the autobuilders, it will build against the unstable versions of these packages. libc6 | 2.3.6.ds1-10 | testing | amd64, arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libc6 | 2.3.6.ds1-10 | unstable | m68k, s390, sparc libc6 | 2.3.6.ds1-11 | unstable | amd64, arm, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc IIRC this is targeted at testing, so no problem. libnewt-pic | 0.52.2-9 | testing | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libnewt-pic | 0.52.2-10 | unstable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc No significant to d-i changes according to the changelog.. syslinux | 3.31-1 | testing | source, amd64, i386 syslinux | 3.31-2 | unstable | source, amd64, i386 A fun new feature that would be nice for amd64+i386 CDs, if it is allowed into testing. apex-nslu2 | 1.4.7 | testing | arm apex-nslu2 | 1.4.14 | unstable | arm Several changes. (New version also makes d-i FTBFS though that should be easy to fix.) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Is removing a (useless) debian/po directory OK for etch?
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Dear release tema, In a recent private discussion with Thomas Bushnell about the ifhp package, we discussed the presence of a debian/po directory in the ifhp package. Given the current state of translation status pages, having this directory, with a templates.pot file, is misleading to translators, who can think that there is something to translatewhile there isn't. The debconf templates have indeed been removed from the package, so the debian/po directory can safely be removed as suggested in #407219 by Thomas Huriaux. Would such a change be OK for etch? Yes. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#408929: Fwd: Processed: Re: Bug#408929: emacs21: crash on spam
* Moritz Muehlenhoff: glibc 2.3.4 introduced more secure heap management, which renders several code injection attacks moot. I think these additional checks have already been bypassed. Shall I dig up a reference? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please make a freeze exception for kpax (documentation change only)
Hello, Changes are: kpax (20061019-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix location of html documentation (Closes: #402596) -- Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:31:28 +0100 Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| pgprnmD8n63NB.pgp Description: PGP signature
please make a freeze exception for hyperspec (i10n change only)
Hello The changelog is: hyperspec (1.23) unstable; urgency=low . * Added XS-X-Vcs-Darcs header * modified S-X-Vcs-Darcs to XS-Vcs-Darcs field * Run debconf-updatepo in the clean target to ensure uptodate PO files. (from lintian) * added Spanish po-debconf translation (Closes: #404621) Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| pgp1WkdwHNhFO.pgp Description: PGP signature
please make a freeze exception for cltl (i10n changes only)
Hello The changelog is: cltl (1.0.23) unstable; urgency=low * Included Spanish po-debconf translation (Closes: #407056) * Added build dependency for po-debconf -- Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:59:18 +0100 cltl (1.0.22) unstable; urgency=low * Run debconf-updatepo in the clean target to ensure uptodate PO files. (from lintian) * Added simplify Chinese translation for cltl (Closes: #404579) -- Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:53:25 +0100 Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| pgpsVSmcoHJeQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
please make a freeze exception for cl-utilities (documentation change only)
Hello, The changes made are only to a html file and adding some fields to the control field: cl-utilities (1.2.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Added XS-X-Vcs-Darcs header * modified S-X-Vcs-Darcs to XS-Vcs-Darcs field * Included better documentation for once-only (Closes: #403973) -- Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:18:57 +0100 # darcs diff --from-tag='DEBIAN_cl-utilities_1.2.4-1' --to-tag='DEBIAN_cl-utilities_1.2.4-2' --unified | grep '^diff' diff -rN -u old-cl-utilities/debian/changelog new-cl-utilities/debian/changelog diff -rN -u old-cl-utilities/debian/control new-cl-utilities/debian/control diff -rN -u old-cl-utilities/doc/once-only.html new-cl-utilities/doc/once-only.html For the control file the diff is: diff -rN -u old-cl-utilities/debian/control new-cl-utilities/debian/control --- old-cl-utilities/debian/control 2007-02-05 11:22:33.0 +0100 +++ new-cl-utilities/debian/control 2007-02-05 11:22:33.0 +0100 @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0) Build-Depends-Indep: dh-lisp Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0 +XS-Vcs-Darcs: http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/repository/pvaneynd/cl-utilities/ Package: cl-utilities Architecture: all Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| pgpWwbcJXXiQH.pgp Description: PGP signature
please make a freeze exception for common-lisp-controller (i10n changes only)
Hello, The only changes are adding the .po file: +common-lisp-controller (6.9) unstable; urgency=low + + * Aded German po-debconf translation (Closes: #399207) + + -- Peter Van Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:05:25 +0100 Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ God, root, what is difference? Pitr | God is more forgiving. Dave Aronson| pgpKsfpa6WhYY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#406064: i386 binNMU for asterisk-chan-capi please
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:46:43AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: Two possibilities: - It works. We can't even reproduce the bug, except with a specific binary that we cannot recreate from sources. Frankly, I'm clueless what to do next then. In that case, I think it would be reasonable to close the bug until and unless it reappears. - It doesn't work. What do we do? Have Mark upgrade random packages (gcc, libfoo-dev, ...) and the bugreporters try again, and loop that procedure ad nauseam? Er, no. At that point, we would want Mark to provide information about his build system so that others could try to duplicate it and reproduce the bug -- Mark changing packages on his system is the absolute last thing you'd want to happen if you actually want to pin the bug and know for sure whether it's a bug in your package's build-depends/conflicts! So we can tag it as moreinfo, severity important (because, without the severity inflation on my side to force this to be handled for etch, that bug is important at most because architecture-specific) This is a wrong rationale. - we have no evidence that the bug is architecture-specific, we only know that only one of the binary packages was confirmed to be affected. - if *any* package in the archive is completely broken, that's still an RC bug, even if the binary packages for all other archs are usable. It is ok to downgrade this bug here based on the lack of information and the lack of concrete impact on the current set of binaries. and let it rot for a few years until it is irrelevant, fine. I fail to see how this is an improvement over closing the bug under the justification Heisenbug, unreproducible, cannot be explained nor investigated, reopen if you ever hit it again and we thus get a bit of reproducibility. There is an obvious course of investigation here -- find out whether Mark's system can still be used to reproduce broken binaries, and take it from there. Before that's been attempted, it's simply false to claim that it's unreproducible. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Permission to upload gnotime to testing-proposed-updates
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 04:14:31PM -0200, Goedson Teixeira Paixao wrote: I've upload gnotime 2.2.2-10 to sid a few days ago with the intention of getting it into Etch. I've now realised it won't be possible to migrate it into Etch through Sid because one of its dependencies (libqof1) is a newer upstream version in Sid. So I'm here asking permission to upload a rebuild of this revision against Etch libraries into testing-proposed-updates so that it can be released with Etch. Why is the newer upstream version of libqof1 a problem? There apparently wasn't a shlibs bump, because britney doesn't report libqof1 as a blocker for gnotime in unstable -- which means either there are no ABI changes in that new upstream version, or libqof1 has an unfiled RC bug. Separately, the changes to src/app.c seem pretty large, and I'm not sure I'm comfortable including such an update; it looks to me like a rather large diff for the fix described. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-installer build deps testing/unstable divergences
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-05 03:14]: apex-nslu2 | 1.4.7 | testing | arm apex-nslu2 | 1.4.14 | unstable | arm Several changes. Yes, there are quite a few changes but I tested the new version yesterday and it seems to work fine. I don't have a problem with putting the new version into testing. (New version also makes d-i FTBFS though that should be easy to fix.) I've put in a work around into the d-i build system now. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please allow dialog 1.0-20060221-3 in etch
dialog (1.0-20060221-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Fixed regression in pause box. Patch by the author. Closes: #409254. -- Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:23:26 +0100 The fix for this bug is a change in a single line. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unfreeze request - rtpproxy (0.3-2)
Changelog says it all.. rtpproxy (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * Updated Short Description - Fixes: Description improvement (Closes: #359626) -- Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:25:29 + -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unfreeze request - speex (1.1.12-3)
This change cleans up the shlibs for speex and has been sitting in unstable for 39 days with no adverse reports. Replaces debian/rules: dh_makeshlibs -a with: dh_makeshlibs -a -V libspeex1 (= 1.1.8) Mark speex (1.1.12-3) unstable; urgency=low * Ensure proper shlibs to circumvent problems like #403544. -- Kilian Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:51:49 +0100 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please unblock libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.45-2
Hi release team, please consider unblocking libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.45-2 for Etch. They only changes are a fix for #399375 and a maintainer change (as agreed with the previous maintainer). Thanks, -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unfreeze request - digikam (2:0.8.2-4)
Request digikam be unfrozen. This release fixes some usability issues, service menus are now only shown for mounted media and fixes the location for some graphics in the tool tips. Thanks, Mark digikam (2:0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium [ Debian KDE Extras Team ] * urgency medium as this fixes some usability issues and is targeted for release with etch [ Achim Bohnet ] * Fix path to icons in digikam tips file. (Closes: #407136): digikam: Missing picture on Tip of the day * debian/control: + bump Standards-version to 3.7.2. No changes necessary + add XS-VCS headers [ Mark Purcell ] * Ensure service menu (digikam_upload_photos.desktop) is displayed for mounted media only - uploading servicemenu does not work with unmounted media (Closes: #404127) -- Debian KDE Extras Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 4 Feb 2007 11:34:05 + -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Request freeze exception for illuminator
Greetings, Please consider illuminator for a freeze exception. It does not build on HPPA because petsc (which I also maintain) )doesn't build on HPPA, which in turn is because of a python bug, #354139. Illuminator is bug-free and lintian clean. It went into unstable 9 days ago, so is scheduled to enter testing tomorrow, if unfrozen. It was part of sarge and woody, and if at all possible I would like it to be in etch as well. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please make a freeze exception for cltl (i10n changes only)
Peter Van Eynde wrote: Hello The changelog is: cltl (1.0.23) unstable; urgency=low Unblocked. Groetjes Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please make a freeze exception for kpax (documentation change only)
Peter Van Eynde wrote: Hello, Changes are: kpax (20061019-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix location of html documentation (Closes: #402596) Unblocked. Groetjes Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock lpe 1.2.6.13-0.1
Thomas Huriaux wrote: Hi, This NMU, prepared by myself and uploaded thanks to Christian, is part of the l10n NMU campaign. lpe (1.2.6.13-0.1) unstable; urgency=low Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please make a freeze exception for cl-utilities (documentation change only)
Peter Van Eynde wrote: Hello, The changes made are only to a html file and adding some fields to the control field: cl-utilities (1.2.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Added XS-X-Vcs-Darcs header * modified S-X-Vcs-Darcs to XS-Vcs-Darcs field * Included better documentation for once-only (Closes: #403973) Unblocked. Groetjes Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please allow dialog 1.0-20060221-3 in etch
Santiago Vila wrote: dialog (1.0-20060221-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Fixed regression in pause box. Patch by the author. Closes: #409254. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please make a freeze exception for common-lisp-controller (i10n changes only)
Peter Van Eynde wrote: Hello, The only changes are adding the .po file: +common-lisp-controller (6.9) unstable; urgency=low Unblocked. Groetjes Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unfreeze request - digikam (2:0.8.2-4)
Mark Purcell wrote: Request digikam be unfrozen. This release fixes some usability issues, service menus are now only shown for mounted media and fixes the location for some graphics in the tool tips. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock remctl 2.2-3 (security)
Russ Allbery wrote: In internal testing, I discovered a long-standing logic bug in remctl (a client/server system for remote Kerberos-authenticated command execution) that would cause the server to treat a non-existant ACL file as authorization success, allowing any authenticated user to execute the command supposedly protected by that missing ACL file. In normal operation, all the ACL files referred to in the remctld configuration obviously exist, but given how easy of a mistake this is to make, I think this warrants a security update to the version in etch. The version in stable is not affected. I've just now uploaded 2.2-3 packages with the minimal fix (the current upstream version is 2.6) with urgency high. Attached is a diff. Assuming that it builds properly on all arches, could you unblock? Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock syslinux 3.31-2
Daniel Baumann wrote: Hi, I included the other *.c32 modules and added a patch to allow syslinux autodetecting while booting if the system has a 32bit or a 64bit CPU, and hence choosing the configured kernel for it. Please unblock syslinux, debdiff is attached. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock bbclone 0.4.6-8
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: Hi, I just fixed a security bug in bbclone: bbclone (0.4.6-8) unstable; urgency=high Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#402274: junior-internet: still depends on old firefox package
Ben Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 16:37:08 -0400 Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is fixed in junior-internet 1.8 which I have just uploaded to unstable. I believe it should go into etch as well, since it contains no substantial changes other than the fix itself. Only please use junior-internet 1.9 instead of 1.8. I just realized after uploading that I still referred to Firefox in the package description instead of Iceweasel which is now fixed in 1.9. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fw: Bug#403868: junior-games-net depends on xpilot which is a dummy package, depend on xpilot-ng instead
Ben Armstrong wrote: This is fixed in junior-games-net 1.3 which I have just uploaded to unstable. I believe it should go into etch as well, since it contains no substantial changes other than the fix itself. Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:06:12 -0500 From: Ariel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#403868: junior-games-net depends on xpilot which is a dummy package, depend on xpilot-ng instead Package: junior-games-net Version: 1.2 Severity: normal Junior-games-net depends on xpilot which is a dummy package. It should depend on xpilot-ng instead. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock jwchat
Torsten Werner wrote: Hi, the package in testing has 2 bugs that are fixed in unstable: - wrong header XS-Vcs-Svn in debian/control - does not enable proxy_http in debian/postinst which is necessary for apache2.2 Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please make a freeze exception for hyperspec (i10n change only)
Peter Van Eynde wrote: Hello The changelog is: hyperspec (1.23) unstable; urgency=low . * Added XS-X-Vcs-Darcs header * modified S-X-Vcs-Darcs to XS-Vcs-Darcs field * Run debconf-updatepo in the clean target to ensure uptodate PO files. (from lintian) * added Spanish po-debconf translation (Closes: #404621) Unblocked. Groetjes Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel-patch-openvz and new patch revision
Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that it is definitly more stable than the 028test007.1 version and have a number of bugfixes corrected. So I want to ask you if it is ok to upload a new version of this patch for etch, and if you will accept it. Can you point us at a source package (for example by uploading to experimental) or something like that so we have an idea of what the actual difference would be? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unfreeze request - rtpproxy (0.3-2)
Mark Purcell wrote: Changelog says it all.. rtpproxy (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * Updated Short Description - Fixes: Description improvement (Closes: #359626) Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.45-2
Niko Tyni wrote: Hi release team, please consider unblocking libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.45-2 for Etch. They only changes are a fix for #399375 and a maintainer change (as agreed with the previous maintainer). Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: unfreeze request - speex (1.1.12-3)
Mark Purcell wrote: This change cleans up the shlibs for speex and has been sitting in unstable for 39 days with no adverse reports. Replaces debian/rules: dh_makeshlibs -a with: dh_makeshlibs -a -V libspeex1 (= 1.1.8) Mark speex (1.1.12-3) unstable; urgency=low * Ensure proper shlibs to circumvent problems like #403544. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: espeak 1.19-2
Steve Langasek, le Sun 04 Feb 2007 15:05:37 -0800, a écrit : I am raising the severity of 408741 to 'grave', which is the correct severity for such a bug. I don't understand this: IIUC the package never worked for these archs. So wouldn't it be OK to upload a 1.16 with big-endian archs disabled? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please unblock geant321 1:3.21.14.dfsg-4
Dear release team, Please consider unblocking geant321 version 1:3.21.14.dfsg-4. It has fixes for two bugs (that are unreported but I would consider them priority important) relative to the current version -1 in Etch. The other changes are trivial (minor aesthetic or build improvements). Details are in my original unblock request for version -3 at [1]. The only difference from 1:3.21.14.dfsg-3 to -4 is that I decided the fix to one of the two main bugs (the one initially fixed in -2) needed to be done in a different and more thorough way. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/01/msg01178.html Thank you for your consideration! best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock geant321 1:3.21.14.dfsg-4
Kevin B. McCarty wrote: Dear release team, Please consider unblocking geant321 version 1:3.21.14.dfsg-4. It has fixes for two bugs (that are unreported but I would consider them priority important) relative to the current version -1 in Etch. The other changes are trivial (minor aesthetic or build improvements). Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Fwd: Processed: Re: Bug#408929: emacs21: crash on spam
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So if there's no evidence of arbitrary code execution, I think it's appropriate here to downgrade the bug -- but the security team should also be apprised. Fine with me. -- ,''`. : :' :Romain Francoise [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: maildrop lacking courier-authlib dependency on amd64, still
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:54:47PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -x maildrop_2.0.3-1_amd64.deb tmp/maildrop/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ objdump -x tmp/maildrop/usr/bin/maildrop | grep auth NEEDED libcourierauth.so.0 RPATH /usr/lib:/usr/lib/courier-authlib You need to either: - Fix dpkg-shlibdeps to look at all rpath entries. - Prevent /usr/lib from being in the rpath, or atleast have /usr/lib/courier-authlib as first in it. The suggested way for the later is upgrading your libtool version. It seems this was done _partialy_. Lots of the aclocal.m4 files still contain old copies of it. The only version of courier-authlib I have locally (courier-authlib_0.58-5_amd64.deb) has a correct looking shlibs file. The problem is not the shlibs file of courier-authlib, the problem is that dpkg-shlibdeps for some reason doesn't find the library because of the rpath that maildrop sets. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: espeak 1.19-2
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Steve Langasek, le Sun 04 Feb 2007 15:05:37 -0800, a écrit : I am raising the severity of 408741 to 'grave', which is the correct severity for such a bug. I don't understand this: IIUC the package never worked for these archs. So wouldn't it be OK to upload a 1.16 with big-endian archs disabled? Yes. But currently, there is a grave bug in testing for these archs. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please allow jed_0.99.18-8.etch.1
Version 0.99.18-8.etch.1 of the jed packages is uploaded to unstable. Please, consider allowing it into testing. The only change in respect to the version currently in testing (0.99.18-8) is the inclusion of the Spanish translation of the debconf templates (closes: #409807, diffs attached below). -- Rafael Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog(.../0.99.18-8) (revision 529) +++ debian/changelog(.../0.99.18-8.etch.1) (revision 529) @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +jed (0.99.18-8.etch.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * debian/po/es.po: Added translation of debconf templates to Spanish. +(closes: #409807). Thanks to Steve Lord Flaubert. + + -- Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 5 Feb 2007 20:11:41 +0100 + jed (0.99.18-8) unstable; urgency=low * debian/po/sv.po: Adjusted msgid strings to correspond to those in Index: debian/po/es.po === --- debian/po/es.po (.../0.99.18-8) (revision 0) +++ debian/po/es.po (.../0.99.18-8.etch.1) (revision 529) @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +# jed po-debconf translation to spanish +# Copyright (C) 2006 Software in the Public Interest, SPI Inc. +# This file is distributed under the same license as the jed package. +# +# Changes: +# - Initial translation +# Steve Lord Flaubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] , 2007 +# +# +# Traductores, si no conoce el formato PO, merece la pena leer la +# documentación de gettext, especialmente las secciones dedicadas a este +# formato, por ejemplo ejecutando: +# info -n '(gettext)PO Files' +# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' +# +# Equipo de traducción al español, por favor lean antes de traducir +# los siguientes documentos: +# - El proyecto de traducción de Debian al español +# http://www.debian.org/intl/spanish/ +# especialmente las notas y normas de traducción en +# http://www.debian.org/intl/spanish/notas +# +# - La guÃa de traducción de po's de debconf: +# /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans +# o http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans +# +# Si tiene dudas o consultas sobre esta traducción consulte con el último +# traductor (campo Last-Translator) y ponga en copia a la lista de +# traducción de Debian al español (debian-l10n-spanish@lists.debian.org) +# +# +msgid +msgstr +Project-Id-Version: jed 0.99.18-6\n +Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +POT-Creation-Date: 2006-08-11 00:49+0200\n +PO-Revision-Date: 2007-02-04 08:07-0500\n +Last-Translator: Steve Lord Flaubert [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n +Language-Team: Spanish debian-l10n-spanish@lists.debian.org\n +MIME-Version: 1.0\n +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +#. Type: boolean +#. Description +#: ../jed-common.templates:1001 +msgid Remove old files in /etc/? +msgstr ¿Borrar los ficheros antiguos en «/etc/»? + +#. Type: boolean +#. Description +#: ../jed-common.templates:1001 +msgid +Due to a bug in dpkg (#108587) the config files 00site.sl, 00debian.sl and +99defaults.sl in /etc/jed-init.d/ and /etc/jed.conf aren't removed after an +upgrade to 0.99.15-1 or higher. +msgstr Debido a un fallo en dpkg (#108587) la configuración de los ficheros 00site.sl, 00debian.sl +y 99defaults.sl en «/etc/jed-init.d/» y «/etc/jed.conf» no se borraron después de una +actualización a la versión 0.99.15-1 o superior. + +#. Type: boolean +#. Description +#: ../jed-common.templates:1001 +msgid +It seems you have modified one of these files, because their md5 sums differ +from the originals. +msgstr Parece que modificó uno de estos ficheros, porque difiere la suma de comprobación +md5 de los originales. +
Re: kernel-patch-openvz and new patch revision
Hi On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 06:48:30PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hi I have got a request from upstream to change the patch revision from 028test007.1 to 028test015. The reason behind this is that it is definitly more stable than the 028test007.1 version and have a number of bugfixes corrected. So I want to ask you if it is ok to upload a new version of this patch for etch, and if you will accept it. Can you point us at a source package (for example by uploading to experimental) or something like that so we have an idea of what the actual difference would be? I think it will be difficult to spot the difference as it have to be reapplied which would cause a huge amount of differences in the patch file. Different order in the patch file give other differences... diff -u patch-2.6.18.5-debian-ovz028test007.1-combined patch-ovz028test015.1-combined | wc -l 251086 So no not that easy to review unfortunatly. Kir: Do you know any easy way to see the differences between the two versions? Regards, // Ola Cheers Luk -- --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37\ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD| | http://opalsys.net/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#408256: Bug#406064: i386 binNMU for asterisk-chan-capi please
Version: 0.7.1-1+b1 On Monday 05 February 2007 10:53, Steve Langasek wrote: In that case, I think it would be reasonable to close the bug until and unless it reappears. It has been reported by Len Padilla that the rebuilt package asterisk-chan-capi (0.7.1-1+b1) fixes the problem. I can't recreate my build environment from Oct 06. And I can't reproduce the bug, additionally I don't have the hardware to test. Thus per Steve's comments above I'm closing the bug. If the problem resurfaces, then please reopen. Mark pgptEHHO22jJA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#408256: Bug#406064: i386 binNMU for asterisk-chan-capi please
On Monday 05 February 2007 21:53, Mark Purcell wrote: I can't recreate my build environment from Oct 06. And I can't reproduce the bug, additionally I don't have the hardware to test. One theory though looking at the time line: asterisk-chan-capi (0.7.1-1) would of been built against asterisk (1:1.2.12.1.dfsg-1) Etch now has asterisk (1:1.2.13~dfsg-2) and asterisk-dev may not be version compatible between 1.2.12 1.2.13? This could explain why the binNMU of asterisk-chan-capi now works for etch, and would suggest that asterisk-chan-capi should perhaps have a strict version dependency against asterisk. Mark asterisk-chan-capi (0.7.1-1+b1) testing; urgency=low -- Debian/i386 Build Daemon buildd_i386-ninsei Fri, 2 Feb 2007 00:43:31 -0800 asterisk-chan-capi (0.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=low -- Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:49:40 +0100 asterisk (1:1.2.13~dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low -- Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 6 Nov 2006 06:33:19 + asterisk (1:1.2.13~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=high -- Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 25 Oct 2006 06:46:52 +0100 asterisk (1:1.2.12.1.dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low -- Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:45:58 +0100 pgpbMLVILLPjz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Please allow jedstate_0.5.4.transitional.1-1 and jed-extra_2.2.1-1.etch.1
Request (short):
Please, allow jedstate_0.5.4.transitional.1-1 and
jed-extra_2.2.1-1.etch.1 in testing.
Rationale (long):
Jedstate is a JED add-on which allows the recalling of the cursor
position when a file is revisited in a future session of the JED editor.
The functionalities of jedstate have been superseded by the gdbmrecent
module in the jed-extra package.
Moreover, there has been no sign of upstream activity in jedstate, its
original maintainer orphaned the package half a year ago, and jedstate
is severily broken as regards the current JED initialization system
(Bug#406815).
I decided then to make the Debian JED Group adopt the jedstate package
and transform it into a transition package to allow users migrate their
jedstate database into the new gdbmrecent database. I uploaded
jedstate_0.5.4.transitional.1-1 to unstable, which contains no
upstream files (i.e. *.orig.tar.gz is empty). It provides only a Perl
script (jedstate-to-gdbmrecent) which does the migration above. This new
version of the pacakge also Recommends: jed-extra.
While testing my personal translated database with the gdbmrecent I
discovered a bug in the jed-extra package. I prepared the version of
2.2.1-1.etch.1 of jed-extra for inclusion in etch. The changes are
minimal, essentially the inclusion of
debian/patches/gdbmrecent-clean-stack.dpatch. The diffs between 2.2.1-1
(the version currently in testing) and 2.2.1-1.etch.1 are attached
below.
Thanks in advance,
--
Rafael
Index: debian/patches/gdbmrecent-clean-stack.dpatch
===
--- debian/patches/gdbmrecent-clean-stack.dpatch(.../2.2.1-1)
(revision 0)
+++ debian/patches/gdbmrecent-clean-stack.dpatch(.../2.2.1-1.etch.1)
(revision 544)
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## gdbmrecent-clean-stack.dpatch by Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+##
+## DP: Empty the stack in call to purge_not_so_recent() in function
+## DP: gdbm_delete(). The problem was confirmed by the upstream author.
+
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
+
+--- jed-extra-2.2.1.orig/gdbmrecent/gdbmrecent.sl
jed-extra-2.2.1/gdbmrecent/gdbmrecent.sl
+@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@
+foreach(keys)
+ {
+ key=();
+- gdbm_delete(db, key);
++ () = gdbm_delete(db, key);
+ }
+ }
+
Property changes on: debian/patches/gdbmrecent-clean-stack.dpatch
___
Name: svn:executable
+ *
Index: debian/patches/00list
===
--- debian/patches/00list (.../2.2.1-1) (revision 544)
+++ debian/patches/00list (.../2.2.1-1.etch.1)(revision 544)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
+gdbmrecent-clean-stack
#missing_autoload
-
#apsmode
#ding
+
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog(.../2.2.1-1) (revision 544)
+++ debian/changelog(.../2.2.1-1.etch.1)(revision 544)
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+jed-extra (2.2.1-1.etch.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/patches/01_gdbmrecent-clean-stack.dpatch: Added patch to fix a
+bug in purge_not_so_recent(), which did not popped a value in the
+stack after the call to gdbm_delete(). This patch is blessed by the
+usptream author. [RL]
+
+ -- Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:33:54 +0100
+
jed-extra (2.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
New upstream release [GM]
Re: Please allow jedstate_0.5.4.transitional.1-1 and jed-extra_2.2.1-1.etch.1
* Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-05 23:29]: Request (short): Please, allow jedstate_0.5.4.transitional.1-1 and jed-extra_2.2.1-1.etch.1 in testing. Update: the version of jedstate currently in unstable is 0.5.4.transitional.1-2 (I added a postinst script to the pacakge). -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please allow t-p-u upload for lua-posix
Current vesion of lua-posix in etch has an RC bug (#409448) that can be solved with a two line patch. I've already prepared the package. The problem is a FTBFS, caused by an unclear (at least to me) transition of the unstable package in the already frozen etch: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/01/msg01287.html Since version 1.0-3 and 1.0-4 are essentially identical (only the test file has been modified) I've prepared a 1.0-3 version renamed 1.0-4etch1. Regards. -- Enrico Tassi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can reports of serious policy violations be downgraded to important?
Romain Beauxis a écrit : Le dimanche 4 février 2007 13:35, vous avez écrit : Anyway, one of the bugs is serious. If you keep the bugs merged, the merged reports should have the maximum severity, i.e. serious rather than important. So please upgrade. It is serious regarding the policy violation. However, I do not want to set it to serious as for now because of what Steve said. What Steve said is for #393962 but not #388616. If you wish to add a RC bug more to debian, please ask to the release managers if they feel that this should be solved for debian etch. Release team: I believe that #388616 should be upgraded back to serious. Please state that you agree with Romain if the report shouldn't be upgraded back to serious. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: libpam-ldap upgrade breaks pam_ldap.conf and can't login
Package: libpam-ldap Version: 180-1.5 I've sent the following email and did not receive a response from the libpam-ldap maintainer. I've upgraded another sarge box since and confirmed the bug still exists. This is a serious problem for upgrades from sarge, or any package update, so please fix it before release. -Original Message- From: Jamie ffolliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 5:59 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: libpam-ldap upgrade breaks pam_ldap.conf and can't login Package: libpam-ldap Version: 180-1.4 After an apt-get upgrade, the libpam-ldap packate updated, and in doing so it rewrote parts of the /etc/pam_ldap.conf file as follows - rewrote host, base, ldap_version, pam_password - commented out the uri setting, which is an alternative setting to host that supports ldap over ssl. Since I don't use unencrypted logins to my ldap server, and I'm not sure who would do such a thing, I cannot use the host setting. The latter step that comments out uri in fact breaks authentication to this machine. I've tried dpkg-reconfigure libpam-ldap and there's no option to preserve my URI setting, which must be set to ldaps://ldap.mydomain.com for logins to succeed. Even if I leave host blank, it will still disable the uri setting - and this is the heart of the issue, I can't avoid breaking the existing libpam-ldap config. Luckily I have ssh's pub key authentication setup, so I can get in to fix, but without that this debian client would be rendered useless upon upgrade from sarge to etch. Please consider this critical, I don't want all my servers to be rendered inaccessible after upgrading to etch which I hope to do upon release. It locks out access to the box completely. Thx! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please unblock glide 2002.04.10-13.1
Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of glide, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? The NMU changelog is: Source: glide Version: 2002.04.10-13.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 18:25:28 +0100 Closes: 375673 377260 388113 Changes: glide (2002.04.10-13.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload to fix pending l10n issues. * Debconf translations: - Dutch updated. Closes: #375673, #377260, #388113 -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Please unblock openssl097 0.9.7k-3.1
Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of openssl097, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? The NMU changelog is: Source: openssl097 Version: 0.9.7k-3.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:21:42 +0100 Closes: 362137 399222 408335 Changes: openssl097 (0.9.7k-3.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload to fix pending l10n issues. * Debconf tempaltes translations: - Galician. Closes: #362137 - German. Closes: #399222 - Portuguese. Closes: #408335 -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Please unblock glide 2002.04.10-13.1
Christian Perrier wrote: Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of glide, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock openssl097 0.9.7k-3.1
Christian Perrier wrote: Dear release team, I have just uploaded a NMU of openssl097, to fix its pending l10n issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues). Could you consider hinting it to enter testing? Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
