Re: Unblock xulrunner and tabextensions
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 08:40:27PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: I uploaded what I believe will be the last version of xulrunner targetted for etch. It includes the changes we discussed earlier, plus some minor trivial fixes (debugging symbols and correct component registration for python-xpcom). I also uploaded a new version of tabextensions dropping support for iceweasel (the only change in this version), which makes it suitable for etch. You may want to push it back to testing. Both unblocked. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kdebluetooth upload
Just fyi I just did a kdebluetooth upload to sid that only fixes an incorrect configuration item. Instead of /etc/init.d/bluetooth it still referenced /etc/init.d/bluez-utils which does not exist on our systems. I'm not sure if this should be pressed into etch given thet short amount of time we have. On the other hand it fixes a bug and cannot create a problem IMO. It's up to you. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please allow roundup-1.2.1-9 in
Hello, I have updated packages for roundup, most notably 1.2.1-9, which fixes a grave bug that rendered the predecessor uninstallable. The fix was successfully tested by a user prior to my updating the package. On the whole, the 1.2.1-9 package (and the 1.3.3-2 package) are the best versions of the package so far in existence. Please allow roundup-1.2.1-9 (or 1.3.3-2 if you feel brave) into Etch. Thank you! Best, --Toni++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Desktop upgrade report / aptitude from sid
Hi Steve, Am Montag, 26. März 2007 00:01 schrieb Steve Langasek: On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:52:24PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: - aptitude refused the upgrade: No soultion found for the conflicts open: 11182; closed: 4969; defer: 0; conflict: 3 No solution found within the allotted time. Try harder? [Y/n] Not sure if aptitude from etch would have done better here. I went with apt-get for the critical part. I don't suppose you have a /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates from before the upgrade? I don't really expect a particular aptitude upgrade failure to be reproducible using just a package list. Julien mentioned that there might be a backup. I check that later - postgres-client upgrade confused apt/dpkg completely. Installation of all following packages failed Preparing to replace postgresql-client 7.4.7-6sarge4 (using .../postgresql-client_7.5.22_all.deb) ... install: `/var/lib/postgres/dumpall/7.4': Not a directory dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/postgresql-client_7.5.22_all.deb (--unpack): there is no script in the new version of the package - giving up Ok, so what is /var/lib/postgres/dumpall/7.4 on your system, and do you know how it got that way? It is a directory on my systems, which is what it's supposed to be. /var/lib/postgres was a file. I still have a copy of it. Can send it later. Preparing to replace powernowd 0.90-3 (using .../powernowd_0.97-1_i386.deb) ... Stopping powernowd: powernowd. install: `/var/lib/postgres/dumpall/7.4': Not a directory Why is powernowd worried about postgres/dumpall/7.4 ??? That would be a dpkg bug. I've seen this once before, in a certain corner cases dpkg fails to clean up the maintainer scripts from the previous package it was working with when that other package failed, and it ends up invoking the broken script by mistake. :/ I don't know if this has been filed as a bug against dpkg. I will check and open one, if I don't find one. Unfortunately I cannot repro it any more. Hmm. The package shipped with a symbolic link /lib/modules/2.6.18-4-686/source However, I can not read the target: No such file or directory Therefore, I am deleting /lib/modules/2.6.18-4-686/source Running depmod. Finding valid ramdisk creators. Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk. yaird error: command not found: /usr/bin/ldd (fatal) mkinitrd.yaird failed to create initrd image. Failed to create initrd image. dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9 Um... /usr/bin/ldd is part of the 'Essential' package set (provided by libc6). What the heck happened here?! Certainly there is an /usr/bin/ldd silverboxy:/etc/cups# ls -l /usr/bin/ldd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5972 Feb 21 16:13 /usr/bin/ldd silverboxy:/etc/cups# But presumably you're checking this now, after the fact, so that's not much of an indicator of what was wrong at the time this error happened, I'm afraid. I checked that right after the fail. see the typescript log. - apt-proxy gets removed during aptitude upgrade. When apt-proxy is used for the upgrade, the upgrade is broken. So no upgrades with apt-proxy on localhost are possible with that method. Heh... Well, thanks for the report. I'm afraid I don't know that we're going to do much with it for etch though, your chosen upgrade path doesn't really give us much feedback on the method we're currently recommending because it's not clear that your aptitude attempt was consistent with the first steps on http://wiki.debian.org/Sarge2EtchUpgradeBlackboard. I was not aware of the wiki page. I think it should be formally announced that other developers/users are testing it at well. I wanted to test the proposed upgrade path, which I found on the mailing list. On the other hand, I wanted to have the system upgraded, and after aptitude dist-upgrade not working at all, in fact I was of that upgrade path early. Nevertheless, I think the postgres issue would have shown up as well. Not sure about ldd... Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07032-359190 jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
Re: Desktop upgrade report / aptitude from sid
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
steps on http://wiki.debian.org/Sarge2EtchUpgradeBlackboard.
I was not aware of the wiki page. I think it should be formally announced
that
other developers/users are testing it at well.
At least with the dpkg-query -W step close to the end of the page, I have
found some problems. Sometimes there are second fields in output lines which
certainly would confuse aptitude? (Pass the output through awk '{print $1}' ?)
Otherwise at first and second glance the instructions look fine. I will
sacrifice a live system later this week...
Cheers
Steffen
--
Steffen Grunewald * MPI Grav.Phys.(AEI) * Am Mühlenberg 1, D-14476 Potsdam
Cluster Admin * http://pandora.aei.mpg.de/merlin/ * http://www.aei.mpg.de/
* e-mail: steffen.grunewald(*)aei.mpg.de * +49-331-567-{fon:7233,fax:7298}
No Word/PPT mails - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Priority of libsasl2 in etch
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:12:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: # dpkg -s libsasl2 Package: libsasl2 Status: install ok installed Priority: important Section: libs Installed-Size: 72 Maintainer: Debian Cyrus SASL Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Source: cyrus-sasl2 Version: 2.1.22.dfsg1-8 Depends: libsasl2-2 (= 2.1.22.dfsg1-8) Description: Authentication abstraction library This is a transitional dummy package. If nothing depends on it, this package can be safely removed. If it's a dummy package, why is it important, and Section: libs? Could we please change this to optional and oldlibs before the release? Given that it is a dummy package, the cost of keeping it at 'important' for now IMHO doesn't outweigh the risk of changing it a week before release. Hmm, it's not as if we didn't have any knowledge about what debian-installer does and how it chooses the packages to install, or how we do generate our install images. The risk of downgrading libsasl2 to optional is that it may end up being missing from install CDs (who are made based on priorities, among other things) but either debian-installer might still want to install it, or the user might want to install a package which still depends on it, as apt-cache rdepends libsasl2 is not empty. I agree that it's a little bit late for this, but we could downgrade to standard at least, and it would still be present on install CDs (we have a policy of including all standard and above packages in netinst and CD images, don't we?). Regarding the section, moving to oldlibs should not break anything. People will appreciate that deborphan does what it's supposed to do. Could we please consider the section at least? It's not as if we didn't have any testers installing new Debian systems everyday using the daily generated images. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Priority of libsasl2 in etch
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: I believe that Fabian has made more than request for the priority/section to be fixed for the sasl2 packages, since we have the documentation as optional, but it shows up as important because of the overrides. The priority of the documentation package is especially irritating.
Please unblock figlet 2.2.2-1
Not having this version of figlet makes it impossible for free figlet clones to use the figlet fonts. It has beenin unstable for 5 months and also fixes a potential security issue. Thanks, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Desktop upgrade strategy (was: What should be upgraded first: kernel or userland?)
On Sunday 25 March 2007 12:48, Steve Langasek wrote: Would you mind doing such an install test? I think we are going to push this in, but given the timing I would definitely be more comfortable to have that extra assurance. I've tested that aptitude from unstable works fine during new D-I installs and that the removes packages installed with apt-get issue was resolved. Cheers, FJP pgpQkq4AVg61q.pgp Description: PGP signature
[SECURITY] Please unblock ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-8
ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-8 fixes numerous bugs with corrupted streams, exploitability was not confirmed but 11 potential crashes require some attention. Thanks, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please unblock slrn 0.9.8.1pl1-28
Hi, I decided to disable the charset patch introduced in -22 again, because it leads to some problems which I think aren't acceptable for a stable release (e.g. #411667). Please unblock slrn 0.9.8.1pl1-28 which has this patch disabled. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock tig
Sebastian Harl wrote: Hi, Please let tig 0.5-3 migrate to Etch. It only fixes the version number reported by tig --version (#409095) and adds a watch file. Sorry, we are only considering packages that fix RC bugs anymore... so not unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock powersave 0.14.0-6
Michael Biebl wrote: Hi, powersave-0.14.0-6 has been blocked for 101 days with no bug reported against it in between. -6 contains quite a couple of fixes for annyoing bugs, so please unblock it for testing. This is the corresponding changelog: Sorry, we are only considering packages that fix RC bugs anymore... so not unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock smstools
schönfeld / in-medias-res.com wrote: Hi there, people on this list told and showed me that my last smstools package was buggy. Now i'm pretty sure it isn't anymore and therefore I'm asking for unblocking of smstools, because the version currently in etch *is* buggy (upgrade path is broken). Sorry, we are only considering packages that fix RC bugs anymore... so not unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock unp 1.0.11
Eduard Bloch wrote: Hi people, please unblock the unp package, version 1.0.11. It has a one-line fix which avoids a pretty nasty memory bomb, AFAICS without side effects. Approved. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please allow mp3roaster 0.30.0-1.1 in Etch (see bug #397069)
Gunnar Wolf wrote: Hi, Just the same day Britney removed this package from Testing, I uploaded a NMU fixing the problem (see bug #397069 - It was incorrectly tagged at a low priority, so it didn't get anybody's attention). Its install base is not overwhelming but still not despisable (popcon reports 126), and is present in Sarge. I intend on adopting this package, as suggested by its current maintainer in the bug report. Sorry, we are not considering to readd the package at this stage. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: PBNJ 2.04-3 in etch release
Joshua D. Abraham wrote: Hello, Recently, there was a update to PBNJ which includes a fixed to a bug, which wasn't submitted to debian. I am writing to request that pbnj-2.04-3 be included in the upcoming etch release. Sorry, we are only considering packages that fix RC bugs anymore... so not unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
release notes and alsaconf
Hello, my upgrade from sarge to etch broke my sound configuration. Fortunately, I was not the only one with that problem and I googled a solution (http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/09/msg00949.html). Is it worth that it goes into 5.1 Potential problems of the release notes? Something along the lines: 5.1.5 Sound stops working In rare cases the sound stops working after the upgrade. In this case go through the alsa checklist 1) run alsaconf as root user 2) add your user to the 'audio' group 3) use alsamixer and make sure levels are up and it is unmuted 4) arts or esound stopped? 5) OSS modules unloaded? 6) speakers on? 7) does `cat /dev/urandom /dev/dsp` work for root? For me alsoconf solved the problem as well. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07032-359190 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
Re: Please allow discover-data version 2.2007.03.21 into etch
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: I just uploaded a new version of discover-data into unstable. It add X driver information for a new video card. Please allow it to propagate into etch. This is the changelog: Sorry, we are only considering RC bug fixes anymore... so not unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please allow discover1 version 1.7.20 into etch
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Yesterday I uploaded a new version of discover1 into unstable. It fixes a bug in video card detection, where it would detect a TV card as a video card and break X autodetection because of this (bug #415620). I also fixed a few low-hanging fruits, and closed a few bugs fixed in earlier versions. Please allow this version to propagate into etch, to make sure X autodetection is as good as possible in etch. Here is the complete changelog. Sorry, we are only considering packages that fix RC bugs anymore... so not unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock yasm 0.5.0-2
Sam Hocevar wrote: yasm 0.5.0-2 fixes a crash with some specific files. Unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock rlinetd/0.6-3
Robert Luberda wrote: Hi, I've recently discovered that rlinetd hangs after it receives the SIGHUP or SIGTERM signals, making impossible to properly stop, reload or restart the service. The bug was introduced in previous upload and occurs only when at least one RPC service was configured. Unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: release notes and alsaconf
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:05:08PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: my upgrade from sarge to etch broke my sound configuration. Fortunately, I was not the only one with that problem and I googled a solution (http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/09/msg00949.html). Is it worth that it goes into 5.1 Potential problems of the release notes? This is the wrong place to ask that question. Please submit a bug report against the release-notes pseudopackage. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gtkgrepmail
David Andel wrote: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gtkgrepmail says: * trying to update gtkgrepmail from 1.0-1 to 1.1-1 (candidate is 46 days old) * gtkgrepmail is in freeze; contact debian-release if update is needed Please update, since 1.0-1 is absolutely unusable in my case. Unblocked, though a better desciption of the problem in this mail and solution in the changelog would have been better... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: please allow roundup-1.2.1-9 in
Toni Mueller wrote: Hello, I have updated packages for roundup, most notably 1.2.1-9, which fixes a grave bug that rendered the predecessor uninstallable. The fix was successfully tested by a user prior to my updating the package. On the whole, the 1.2.1-9 package (and the 1.3.3-2 package) are the best versions of the package so far in existence. Please allow roundup-1.2.1-9 (or 1.3.3-2 if you feel brave) into Etch. Sorry, only packages fixing RC bugs in etch are considered anymore. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Priority of libsasl2 in etch
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:01:34PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:12:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: # dpkg -s libsasl2 Package: libsasl2 Status: install ok installed Priority: important Section: libs Installed-Size: 72 Maintainer: Debian Cyrus SASL Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Source: cyrus-sasl2 Version: 2.1.22.dfsg1-8 Depends: libsasl2-2 (= 2.1.22.dfsg1-8) Description: Authentication abstraction library This is a transitional dummy package. If nothing depends on it, this package can be safely removed. If it's a dummy package, why is it important, and Section: libs? Could we please change this to optional and oldlibs before the release? Given that it is a dummy package, the cost of keeping it at 'important' for now IMHO doesn't outweigh the risk of changing it a week before release. Hmm, it's not as if we didn't have any knowledge about what debian-installer does and how it chooses the packages to install, or how we do generate our install images. The risk of downgrading libsasl2 to optional is that it may end up being missing from install CDs (who are made based on priorities, among other things) but either debian-installer might still want to install it, or the user might want to install a package which still depends on it, as apt-cache rdepends libsasl2 is not empty. I agree that it's a little bit late for this, but we could downgrade to standard at least, and it would still be present on install CDs (we have a policy of including all standard and above packages in netinst and CD images, don't we?). Regarding the section, moving to oldlibs should not break anything. People will appreciate that deborphan does what it's supposed to do. Could we please consider the section at least? Right, I have no objection to changing the section. I'm not convinced that dropping the package to standard priority is a good idea yet, I'll let others from the release team comment. It's not as if we didn't have any testers installing new Debian systems everyday using the daily generated images. It's amazing how long a critical bug can go undetected when you're relying on others to test for it. ;) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock figlet 2.2.2-1
Sam Hocevar wrote: Not having this version of figlet makes it impossible for free figlet clones to use the figlet fonts. It has beenin unstable for 5 months and also fixes a potential security issue. Sorry, only packages fixing RC bugs in etch are considered anymore. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unblock figlet 2.2.2-1
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:18:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Sam Hocevar wrote: Not having this version of figlet makes it impossible for free figlet clones to use the figlet fonts. It has beenin unstable for 5 months and also fixes a potential security issue. Sorry, only packages fixing RC bugs in etch are considered anymore. More concretely, this package has a substantial diff, a build is missing on sparc, and the request for unblock didn't originate with the maintainer... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please unblock ode 0.5.dfsg
Hello, Please unblock ode 0.5.dfsg for Etch. This upload remove some non-free parts of the archive that was not used in the build process. Best regards, Gonéri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kdebluetooth upload
Michael Meskes wrote: Just fyi I just did a kdebluetooth upload to sid that only fixes an incorrect configuration item. Instead of /etc/init.d/bluetooth it still referenced /etc/init.d/bluez-utils which does not exist on our systems. I'm not sure if this should be pressed into etch given thet short amount of time we have. On the other hand it fixes a bug and cannot create a problem IMO. It's up to you. Sorry, only packages fixing RC bugs in etch are considered anymore... so not unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
please unblock python-urwid 0.9.7.2
Hello, I am the upstream author of python-urwid, and I released version 0.9.7.2 to fix a UTF-8 input handling bug that will crash applications using Urwid. Urwid 0.9.7.2 was released 2007-01-03 and has had no problems reported against it. This version has been uploaded into experimental, kindly let me know if I may ask to have this package re-uploaded to unstable/testing. Regards, Ian Ward -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock ode 0.5.dfsg
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:05:15PM +0200, goneri wrote: Please unblock ode 0.5.dfsg for Etch. This upload remove some non-free parts of the archive that was not used in the build process. It also includes this change: diff -Nru /tmp/MHCM4b2XEm/ode-0.5/config/makefile.unix-gcc /tmp/tsM952R9Zj/ode-0.5.dfsg/config/makefile.unix-gcc --- /tmp/MHCM4b2XEm/ode-0.5/config/makefile.unix-gcc2007-03-26 22:09:28.0 + +++ /tmp/tsM952R9Zj/ode-0.5.dfsg/config/makefile.unix-gcc 2004-04-18 20:02:51.0 + @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ RANLIB= LIB_PREFIX=lib LIB_SUFFIX=.a -LINK_OPENGL=-L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/lib/X11R6 -L/usr/lib/X11 -lX11 -lGL -lGLU -lpthread +LINK_OPENGL=-L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/X11/lib -L/usr/lib/X11R6 -L/usr/lib/X11 -lX11 -lGL -lGLU LINK_MATH=-lm ifeq ($(BUILD),release) Could you please explain? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Priority of libsasl2 in etch
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:17:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:01:34PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: Regarding the section, moving to oldlibs should not break anything. People will appreciate that deborphan does what it's supposed to do. Could we please consider the section at least? Right, I have no objection to changing the section. I'm not convinced that dropping the package to standard priority is a good idea yet, I'll let others from the release team comment. Section changed. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock slrn 0.9.8.1pl1-28
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 09:13:06PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: I decided to disable the charset patch introduced in -22 again, because it leads to some problems which I think aren't acceptable for a stable release (e.g. #411667). Please unblock slrn 0.9.8.1pl1-28 which has this patch disabled. Your upload seems to disable three different patches, not just one; why was it not sufficient to disable the last, fallback_charset patch, given that it was stated in the bug report that the crash only happens when fallback_charset is set? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please allow squid_2.6.5-6 fixing CVE-2007-1560 in etch
Hi all, can you please allow the just uploaded squid_2.6.5-6 in etch. This version adds a one-line fix for DoS vulnerability in TRACE requests (CVE-2007-1560). Thanks, -- Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [SECURITY] Please unblock ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-8
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:06:00PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-8 fixes numerous bugs with corrupted streams, exploitability was not confirmed but 11 potential crashes require some attention. Unblocked. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Desktop upgrade strategy (was: What should be upgraded first: kernel or userland?)
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:04:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 25 March 2007 12:48, Steve Langasek wrote: Would you mind doing such an install test? I think we are going to push this in, but given the timing I would definitely be more comfortable to have that extra assurance. I've tested that aptitude from unstable works fine during new D-I installs and that the removes packages installed with apt-get issue was resolved. Ok, thanks. FWIW, aptitude 0.4.4-4 is now in testing. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock figlet 2.2.2-1
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:18:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Sam Hocevar wrote: Not having this version of figlet makes it impossible for free figlet clones to use the figlet fonts. It has beenin unstable for 5 months and also fixes a potential security issue. Sorry, only packages fixing RC bugs in etch are considered anymore. More concretely, this package has a substantial diff, a build is missing on sparc, and the request for unblock didn't originate with the maintainer... Okay, would a t-p-u upload of the current 2.2.1 package with the alternative activated and the security fix be acceptable? Also, there should be a sparc build, I don't know where it's stuck, but it should not be a problem. Carlos, if Steve and/or Luk agree, would you like to do such an upload? I can provide the diff or do the NMU if you want. -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock figlet 2.2.2-1
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:48:06AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:18:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Sam Hocevar wrote: Not having this version of figlet makes it impossible for free figlet clones to use the figlet fonts. It has beenin unstable for 5 months and also fixes a potential security issue. Sorry, only packages fixing RC bugs in etch are considered anymore. More concretely, this package has a substantial diff, a build is missing on sparc, and the request for unblock didn't originate with the maintainer... Okay, would a t-p-u upload of the current 2.2.1 package with the alternative activated and the security fix be acceptable? Also, there should be a sparc build, I don't know where it's stuck, but it should not be a problem. Yeah, that should be ok, but getting t-p-u/non-free builds poses an additional challenge. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Desktop upgrade strategy (was: What should be upgraded first: kernel or userland?)
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:25:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: I think we should provide recommendations on how to recover and make sure that we point out that network upgrades might need a remote control mechanism (remote console access) just in case. Right, agreed. I've added the remote serial console recommendation, and removed the remark that reboot is seldom needed from the Release Notes (as this is not the case for etch). Should be visible soon at http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-backup Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kdebluetooth upload
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:25:10PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Sorry, only packages fixing RC bugs in etch are considered anymore... so not unblocked. I expected this. No problem with me. I just wanted to let you guys know so you can decide. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
