Re: Stable update of dajaxice
Hi Angel, On Thursday 24 February 2011 12:27:21 Angel Abad wrote: 2011/2/24 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Hi, On Thu, February 24, 2011 10:16, Angel Abad wrote: I've prepared an upload to stable for package dajaxice, since python-django was patched for problems related with crsf cookies, dajaxice is unusable in squeeze. Was this issue introduced as a side-effect of the changes in DSA-2163-1, specifically those marked as backwardly-incompatible? If so then it would be good if this could also be fixed via the security archive, as the regression was introduced in a security update (albeit in a different package); I've CCed the security team for comment. Yes, you are right is a side-effect of DSA-2163-1 - CVE-2011-0696 Please upload the package to security-master then. Note that you need to change the target in the changelog and build the package with full source (-sa flag). Full checklist of packages for security-master is here: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-building The security team will then take care of releasing it through security-master. Cheers, Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: perl 5.12/5.14 transition plans
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:40:26PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: You can see the transition tracking bugs at [1]. Additionally, bugs which are not perl 5.12 specific but which may affect binNMUs are http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-5.12-transition-ftbfs-sid;users=debian-p...@lists.debian.org Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110226160830.gy4...@urchin.earth.li
Re: Bug#615157: gcc-4.6: -Wunused-but-set-variable -Werror does not imply -Werror=unused-but-set-variable
On 26.02.2011 07:43, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Package: gcc-4.6 Version: 4.6-20110216-1 I would have expected all three to error out. Known problem? yes, explicitly disabled in the package, for a limited time. If you keep this warning enabled, it will result in too many build failures. Somebody needs to scan the successful build logs of a test rebuild for these warnings, file bug reports, user-tag them with debian-...@lists.debian.org, and after we know what needs to be fixed, we can turn this warning on again. Could you work on filing these reports? These reports will end up as release critical bug reports for wheezy, so maybe start filing these with severity important. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d692d1d.3040...@debian.org
Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?
On 26.02.2011 04:42, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 25.02.2011 08:46, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Clearly one should be mindful of the effect on GCC -- that's why I asked the question on debian-gcc. Do you have any specific concerns? Have any concerns been raised on the GCC mailing list? I've googled and found only anecdotal positive reports: http://www.listware.net/201003/gcc-gcc/99756-gmp-501-and-gcc-45.html Is there a GCC autobuilder suite that can do all these rebuilds? I will upload there. I don't have such a setup. OK, but someone must have a similar setup. People are occasionally rebuilding the archive to test new GCC versions. Anyone on the debian-gcc list got an idea? does gcc still work when gmp5 is in the archive, and mpfr is not yet rebuilt against the new gmp5? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d692f2d.1050...@debian.org
Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:49:49PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 26.02.2011 04:42, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 25.02.2011 08:46, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Clearly one should be mindful of the effect on GCC -- that's why I asked the question on debian-gcc. Do you have any specific concerns? Have any concerns been raised on the GCC mailing list? I've googled and found only anecdotal positive reports: http://www.listware.net/201003/gcc-gcc/99756-gmp-501-and-gcc-45.html Is there a GCC autobuilder suite that can do all these rebuilds? I will upload there. I don't have such a setup. OK, but someone must have a similar setup. People are occasionally rebuilding the archive to test new GCC versions. Anyone on the debian-gcc list got an idea? does gcc still work when gmp5 is in the archive, and mpfr is not yet rebuilt against the new gmp5? Sure: I've been running that way at home for a year. Why wouldn't it work? Instead of asking cryptic questions, could you please spell out your concerns in detail so that we could address them. Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?
On 26.02.2011 18:08, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:49:49PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 26.02.2011 04:42, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 25.02.2011 08:46, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Clearly one should be mindful of the effect on GCC -- that's why I asked the question on debian-gcc. Do you have any specific concerns? Have any concerns been raised on the GCC mailing list? I've googled and found only anecdotal positive reports: http://www.listware.net/201003/gcc-gcc/99756-gmp-501-and-gcc-45.html Is there a GCC autobuilder suite that can do all these rebuilds? I will upload there. I don't have such a setup. OK, but someone must have a similar setup. People are occasionally rebuilding the archive to test new GCC versions. Anyone on the debian-gcc list got an idea? does gcc still work when gmp5 is in the archive, and mpfr is not yet rebuilt against the new gmp5? Sure: I've been running that way at home for a year. Why wouldn't it work? I didn't ask about your *home*, but the *archive* (and the buildds). Instead of asking cryptic questions, could you please spell out your concerns in detail so that we could address them. what is cryptic about the question? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d69341e.4060...@debian.org
Re: [SRM] upload of debian-reference/2.46 to stable
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 22:20 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: | debian-reference (2.46) stable; urgency=low | | * Updated Portguese translation by Américo Monteiro. | * Fixed s/--get-selection/--get-selections/ etc. Closes: #612435 | * Reflected introduction of squeeze-updates suite which replaced | Debian Volatile Service. Closes: #614224 | * Fixed URL for Debian Mirror Checker site. Closes: #614253 Thanks for working on this. The above sounds okay; is a debdiff of the proposed upload available somewhere? Is an upload to sid planned soon? If the package has the same version in stable and testing at the time of the point release then dak will automatically propagate the new stable package upwards in to testing (and unstable as well if required) in order to ensure that the version constraints between the suites are met; that may or may not be what you want. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298742321.535.5759.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload desktop-base
Hi, On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:16 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: it seems that plymouth spacefun script doesn't work fine with dual monitor setup (#613249). I've checked the patch on a dual monitor setup and it seems to do the job just fine so I'd like to push it for 6.0.1 or 6.0.2. The patch looks okay; thanks. Please feel free to go ahead with the upload for 6.0.1. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298742706.535.5788.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload thunar-volman
Hi, On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or 6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman? It's only a matter of shipping a config file, so the following diff should do the trick: Apologies if I'm missing something obvious, but what's the motivation for making this change in stable? The changelog for the proposed upload and the corresponding upload to unstable don't provide any further information afaics (hence the suspicion that I'm missing something). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298743239.535.5830.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRM] (PRSC) Possible removal of tsclient from stable
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:57 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: tsclient was removed from unstable recently: it has two CVE reports pending and no upstream. The rationale was that a suitable replacement, remmina, is in the archive. Since remmina is also in stable, I propose to remove tsclient from stable too, which gets these security problems out of the way. Before filing a removal bug, I'd like opinions from SRM and the package maintainers. The timing of the removal is a little unfortunate, given that it was originally suggested 18 months ago and the bug report (#547314) indicates that it was planned to be processed last August. Although it's a leaf package, it does have non-neglible popcon (recent count over 800). GNOME maintainers - any thoughts? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298743613.535.5859.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#613723: pu: package sun-java6/6.22-1
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 21:27 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: the version 6.24-1 of the package contains important security related bugfixes. I would take 6.24-1 from unstable and build a version 6.24-1~squeeze1 for stable. All the changes in the unstable package are safe for stable. I am attaching a source package diff between 6.22-1 ... 6.24-1. Given that we have no realistic means of extracting the security fixes from the other changes, please go ahead. Reports of real-world tests on stable systems (successful or otherwise) would be appreciated. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298743876.535.5882.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#613741: opu: package sun-java6/6-24-0lenny1
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 23:41 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: please have a look at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ for an (security) update of sun-java6 in oldstable. Please go ahead. As with the stable update, reports of real-world tests of the packages in an oldstable environment would be appreciated. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1298744636.535.5931.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#615129: Renaming bug
tag 615129 - moreinfo retitle 615129 RM: kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5 thanks Hi! I am retitling this bug correctly. Qt 3 is a special case and should be treated separately. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Without us [Free Software developers], people would study computer science and programming without ever having seen a real program in its entirety. That's like becoming writers without ever having read a complete book. Matthias Ettrich, founder of the KDE project. http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/25412/news.htm Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Renaming bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 615129 - moreinfo
Bug #615129 {Done: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com} [release.debian.org]
RM: kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
retitle 615129 RM: kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5
Bug #615129 {Done: Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com} [release.debian.org]
RM: kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#615129 to the same title
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
615129: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615129
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129874582210675.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: avahi_0.6.27-2+squeeze1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pam-pgsql_0.7.1-4+squeeze1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ptqem-0004wt...@franck.debian.org
Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?
Hi Adam, On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:15:44PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 04:48 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:39:39PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Have any of the reverse-dependencies been test-built against the new version? Does the move to 5.0.1 imply any source changes being required for reverse-dependencies, or just rebuilds? (I say just as there appear to be around 350 r-dependencies, including at least five from the GCC suite). I haven't done any test-builds. Since the -dev package changed name, I presume that just rebuild won't work; rather, the sources have to edit their build-deps. Out of interest, why is the -dev package versioned? Thinking about this more, I can't think of any reason for it to be versioned. Especially since two GMP versions cannot coexist in the archive. So I think I'll upload with simply libgmp-dev. Are you ready for the new upload? Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?
Dear Matthias, On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 06:10:54PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 26.02.2011 18:08, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Instead of asking cryptic questions, could you please spell out your concerns in detail so that we could address them. what is cryptic about the question? Thanks for your input. However, I don't find this conversation productive any longer. Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SRM] (PRSC) Possible removal of tsclient from stable
Le samedi 26 février 2011 à 18:06 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:57 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: tsclient was removed from unstable recently: it has two CVE reports pending and no upstream. The rationale was that a suitable replacement, remmina, is in the archive. Since remmina is also in stable, I propose to remove tsclient from stable too, which gets these security problems out of the way. Before filing a removal bug, I'd like opinions from SRM and the package maintainers. The timing of the removal is a little unfortunate, given that it was originally suggested 18 months ago and the bug report (#547314) indicates that it was planned to be processed last August. Although it's a leaf package, it does have non-neglible popcon (recent count over 800). GNOME maintainers - any thoughts? TTBOMK, no other remote desktop client has the amount of functionality tsclient provides, so that explains the high popcon. If it’s possible security-wise, I think it would be better to keep it in stable. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: gcc-4.6: -Wunused-but-set-variable -Werror does not imply -Werror=unused-but-set-variable
Matthias Klose wrote: yes, explicitly disabled in the package, for a limited time. If you keep this warning enabled, it will result in too many build failures. Somebody needs to scan the successful build logs of a test rebuild for these warnings, file bug reports, user-tag them with debian-...@lists.debian.org, and after we know what needs to be fixed, we can turn this warning on again. Sure, given access to some build logs, I'd be happy to start working through them and filing reports. These reports will end up as release critical bug reports for wheezy, so maybe start filing these with severity important. Isn't it already an almost-RC bug (as in, an FTBFS waiting to happen) for packages to use -Werror rather than more targetted options on autobuilders? Thanks. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110226220616.GB19176@elie
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload thunar-volman
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or 6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman? It's only a matter of shipping a config file, so the following diff should do the trick: Apologies if I'm missing something obvious, but what's the motivation for making this change in stable? The changelog for the proposed upload and the corresponding upload to unstable don't provide any further information afaics (hence the suspicion that I'm missing something). There have been recent news about security issues with automount stuff (linked with vulnerabilities in pdf parsers and thumbnailers). It doesn't warrant a DSA, but I think it's safer to ship thunar-volman with automount/autobrowse/autorun disabled by default. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload thunar-volman
On 02/26/2011 05:32 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [snip] Apologies if I'm missing something obvious, but what's the motivation for making this change in stable? The changelog for the proposed upload and the corresponding upload to unstable don't provide any further information afaics (hence the suspicion that I'm missing something). There have been recent news about security issues with automount stuff (linked with vulnerabilities in pdf parsers and thumbnailers). It doesn't warrant a DSA, but I think it's safer to ship thunar-volman with automount/autobrowse/autorun disabled by default. Isn't it auto*run* which opens a vulnerability, and thus should be disabled by default? Disabling automount autobrowse seem to be security overkill. -- I prefer banana-flavored energy bars made from tofu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d699401.8070...@cox.net
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload thunar-volman
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:00 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Isn't it auto*run* which opens a vulnerability, and thus should be disabled by default? Autorun can leads to somehow direct exploitation. Disabling automount autobrowse seem to be security overkill. Autobrowse means a file manager is opened, which, by default, tries to make thumbnails of files, which, in turn, can lead to code execution by exploiting bugs in pdf parsers. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload desktop-base
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 17:51 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:16 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: it seems that plymouth spacefun script doesn't work fine with dual monitor setup (#613249). I've checked the patch on a dual monitor setup and it seems to do the job just fine so I'd like to push it for 6.0.1 or 6.0.2. The patch looks okay; thanks. Please feel free to go ahead with the upload for 6.0.1. Uploaded, thanks! -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload thunar-volman
On 02/26/2011 06:01 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:00 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Isn't it auto*run* which opens a vulnerability, and thus should be disabled by default? Autorun can leads to somehow direct exploitation. Right. Disabling automount autobrowse seem to be security overkill. Autobrowse means a file manager is opened, which, by default, tries to make thumbnails of files, which, in turn, can lead to code execution by exploiting bugs in pdf parsers. Ah. Turn off thumbnailing of removable media? -- I prefer banana-flavored energy bars made from tofu. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d699b13.6060...@cox.net
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload thunar-volman
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:30 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Ah. Turn off thumbnailing of removable media? Why? I do like having thumbnails of my pictures when I plug an sdcard from my camera. Anyway this is not really a topic for debian-release imho. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [squeeze] permission to upload thunar-volman
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 00:32:04 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: There have been recent news about security issues with automount stuff (linked with vulnerabilities in pdf parsers and thumbnailers). It doesn't warrant a DSA, but I think it's safer to ship thunar-volman with automount/autobrowse/autorun disabled by default. I'm not sure it warrants a stable update either, or that it makes sense to have thunar behave differently from nautilus or whatever the kde equivalent is called this week. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227003644.gm12...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Re: [SRM] upload of debian-reference/2.46 to stable
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 05:45:21PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 22:20 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
| debian-reference (2.46) stable; urgency=low
|
| * Updated Portguese translation by Américo Monteiro.
| * Fixed s/--get-selection/--get-selections/ etc. Closes: #612435
| * Reflected introduction of squeeze-updates suite which replaced
| Debian Volatile Service. Closes: #614224
| * Fixed URL for Debian Mirror Checker site. Closes: #614253
Thanks for working on this. The above sounds okay; is a debdiff of the
proposed upload available somewhere?
Here it is. (I excluded *.po and *.pot files for debdiff of dsc files
since they contain line numbers which is different due to rebuild and
causes debdiff to be 16892KB instead of 33KB).
Is an upload to sid planned soon?
Not so soon. If I do, it will be 2.47
If the package has the same version in stable and testing at the time
of the point release then dak will automatically propagate the new
stable package upwards in to testing (and unstable as well if
required) in order to ensure that the version constraints between the
suites are met; that may or may not be what you want.
Thanks.
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files of package debian-reference: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-common: lines which differ (wdiff
format)
---
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-de: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-en: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Installed-Size: [-4012-] {+4008+}
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-es: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-fr: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-it: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-ja: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Installed-Size: [-4408-] {+4404+}
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-pl: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-pt: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Installed-Size: [-4052-] {+4068+}
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-pt-br: lines which differ (wdiff
format)
--
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-zh-cn: lines which differ (wdiff
format)
--
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
Control files of package debian-reference-zh-tw: lines which differ (wdiff
format)
--
Version: [-2.45-] {+2.46+}
diff -Nru --exclude '*.po' --exclude '*.pot'
debian-reference-2.45/asciidoc/02_package.txt
debian-reference-2.46/asciidoc/02_package.txt
--- debian-reference-2.45/asciidoc/02_package.txt 2010-09-08
21:50:36.0 +0900
+++ debian-reference-2.46/asciidoc/02_package.txt 2011-02-26
09:01:01.0 +0900
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ @-@codename-stable@-@/updates main contrib
-Please note `ftp.XX.debian.org` must be replaced with appropriate mirror
site URL for your location, for USA `ftp.us.debian.org`, which can be found
in http://www.debian.org/mirror/list[the list of Debian worldwide mirror
sites]. The status of these servers can be checked at
http://www.de.debian.org/dmc/[Debian Mirror Checker site].
+Please note `ftp.XX.debian.org` must be replaced with appropriate mirror
site URL for your location, for USA `ftp.us.debian.org`, which can be found
in http://www.debian.org/mirror/list[the list of Debian worldwide mirror
sites]. The status of these servers can be checked at
http://ftp.de.debian.org/dmc/[Debian Mirror Checker site].
Here, I tend to use codename
Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Raise severity for KDE3 / Qt3 removal reminder bugs (squeeze has been released)
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 19:45:11 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:11:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: 1. lower the severity of these bugs to important or lower Yes please. Based on response from #debian-qt-kde that was a bad idea on my part. Not wanting to spam people further, I'm leaving things as they are (half of the bugs important, half serious). Care to elaborate? Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227012234.go12...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Severity for KDE3 / Qt3 removal reminder bugs
Julien Cristau wrote: Care to elaborate? As I understand it: The Qt 3 part is a red herring. Bugs blocking removal of Qt 3 really should _not_ be release critical as long as there is someone willing to maintain Qt 3 itself. I'm not aware of an RFA, so... As for the KDE 3 part: to avoid user confusion and maintenance hassle, including KDE 3 in wheezy (at least unless someone else comes in and shows interest and competence at maintaining the beast) is not something the KDE maintainers consider an option. So packages which only work with KDE 3 need to be removed or ported to KDE 4. Those packages are mostly being removed already. As long as it gets taken care of quickly, I don't personally mind. And some people at #debian-qt-kde seemed to mind my meddling a lot. The status of KDE 3 removal is being tracked at http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org;tag=kde3libs-removal I didn't get a clear answer about what the preferred severity is for these bugs on IRC, so my reaction is to step away quietly... But given clear answers, I'd be glad to clean up my mess. Hope that helps, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227013919.GA21197@elie
Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I would like to propose inclusion of Debian ARM for hard float port ('armhf')
into Debian main archive as a release goal.
ARM for hard float porters will add bug blockers to this bug to ease release
team work.
Best regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110227021107.1045.24894.report...@flaco.tsc-farm.upc.es
Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive
reassign 615513 ftp.debian.org
kthxbye
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 02:11:07 +, Hector Oron wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I would like to propose inclusion of Debian ARM for hard float port
('armhf') into Debian main archive as a release goal.
What does this have to do with the release team? We don't run the
archive...
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110227023208.ga3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Processed: Re: Bug#615513: release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 615513 ftp.debian.org Bug #615513 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 615513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129877393624148.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): block 615513 with 604688 605013 521918 533934 589809 552881 552873 501414 577029 596936 593049 367831 590952 599725 598937 577364 571389 495889 596986 598933 602668 598923 5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 615513 with 604688 605013 521918 533934 589809 552881 552873 501414 577029 596936 593049 367831 590952 599725 598937 577364 571389 495889 596986 598933 602668 598923 574299 563050 598885 588631 580678 573759 602169 577899 605033 543029 544831 552872 596997 597920 604107 565001 565101 565101 598936 536544 527419 604792 596952 597000 596996 596989 596960 605841 604523 596968 604692 604537 604535 604527 604693 604533 604669 604691 604664 604666 604656 604662 604654 604665 604674 604651 604650 604649 604679 604670 604673 604681 604660 604658 604653 605842 Bug #615513 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: armhf inclusion into the archive Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 615513: 593049, 539028, 596986, 597000, 595743, 552873, 501414, 596968, 563050, 598933, 590952, 605841, 596952, 527419, 552872, 544831, 604688, 604673, 536544, 580678, 521918, 604792, 604681, 495889, 604662, 533934, 604674, 577364, 604654, 604537, 569118, 591560, 604692, 604651, 589809, 598885, 577899, 543029, 565101, 604693, 604666, 596989, 552881, 602169, 598936, 605013, 604527, 604653, 604656, 577029, 598923, 602668, 565001, 604691, 578733, 597920, 604650, 367831, 598937, 604523, 573759, 596996, 588631, 599725, 604649, 604679, 596936, 581277, 604535, 574299, 604665, 604660, 604669, 571389, 604670, 604658, 604107, 596997, 595828, 594179, 604533, 596960, 605842, 605033, and 604664 Failed to set blocking bugs of 615513: failed to get lock on /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge -- Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/merge Resource temporarily unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 532. at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 545. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 615513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129877344621747.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
