Re: Bug#692740: unblock: hyperestraier/1.4.13-8
hi, At Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:31:18 +0900, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote: > Subject: Bug#692740: unblock: hyperestraier/1.4.13-8 I'm sorry forgetting to add the keyword, this bug is intended as "pre approval" request (so package itself still don't be uploaded). # I fixed BTS title. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru
Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 00:09:52 +0100 intrigeri wrote: [...] > Hi, Hi! Thanks for your very fast reply. > > Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) : > > unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9 > > The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is > supposed to meet the current guidelines for freeze exceptions [1]. > Please clarify. > > [1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html To be frank, the proposed update was actually supposed to meet the previous guidelines for freeze exceptions: "translation updates and documentation fixes". The drop of the dependency on a virtual package makes the package comply with the new Debian Ruby Policy. The remaining changes are really minor ones. I had requested another unblock (with more changes) on last September, the 30th, and it was granted (see #689204). Since then, I have prepared the upload of version 0.1.9, which was due about one week ago, but was delayed because of personal issues. Sorry about that. At that point, I received the debian-devel-announce message [2], which announced the updated freeze policy, and I thought "I hope I am still on time to get a freeze exception!". [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/11/msg3.html Now I am sorry, if I managed all this situation the wrong way, but I felt it would have been a shame to postpone the accumulated changes until after the wheezy release... :-( Thanks for your patience. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpRpGO399yKO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 692928 + moreinfo Bug #692928 [release.debian.org] unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13525890224748.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9
tags 692928 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) : > unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9 The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is supposed to meet the current guidelines for freeze exceptions [1]. Please clarify. [1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html Cheers! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85txsx12db@boum.org
Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package apt-listbugs As can be seen with the following command on the public git repository: $ git diff apt-listbugs/0.1.8..apt-listbugs/0.1.9 | filterdiff \ --exclude='*.po' --exclude='*.pot' the only non-l10n changes from version 0.1.8 are: * minor improvements for the Makefile * drop of Thomas Müller from the Uploaders field at his request * drop of a superfluos dependency on a virtual package I am attaching the output of the above mentioned command. If you like to review the changes organized in commits, please feel free to take a look at the git repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs.git;a=shortlog Thanks for your time! unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash apt-listbugs_018_019.diff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#692137: unblock(pre-approval): zsnes/1.510+bz2-5
* Adam D. Barratt [121110 21:02]: > Thanks. In that case, please go ahead. Done, zsnes_1.510+bz2-5 is now in unstable. Thanks! -- Etienne Millon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121110210457.GA21744@klow
Bug#692921: Unblock: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
please unblock package capi4hylafax.
The updated capi4hylafax 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 fixes two RC bugs about
the same issue:
* Only suggest package isdnactivecards. Closes: #682135, #691863.
Could you unblock capi4hylafax 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18?
Details are in the attached debdiff.
unblock capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18
Many thanks for your work,
---
Have a nice day.
Joachim (Germany)
diff -Nru capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/changelog capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/changelog
--- capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/changelog 2012-06-18 21:10:11.0 +0200
+++ capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/changelog 2012-11-04 10:02:35.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+capi4hylafax (1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Only suggest package isdnactivecards. Closes: #682135, #691863.
+
+ -- Joachim Wiedorn Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:03:33 +0100
+
capi4hylafax (1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17) unstable; urgency=medium
* New maintainer (adopted).
diff -Nru capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/control capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/control
--- capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/control 2012-06-18 21:10:11.0 +0200
+++ capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/control 2012-11-02 22:02:03.0 +0100
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@
Package: capi4hylafax
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, capiutils
-Recommends: hylafax-server, isdnactivecards
-Suggests: dialog
+Recommends: hylafax-server
+Suggests: dialog, isdnactivecards
Description: Faxing over CAPI 2.0 device
If you have working capi20 interface, use this package to send and
receive fax over capi. It can be used as a "fax-modem" for a
diff -Nru capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/README.Debian capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/README.Debian
--- capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/README.Debian 2012-06-12 18:13:15.0 +0200
+++ capi4hylafax-01.03.00.99.svn.300/debian/README.Debian 2012-11-04 10:15:12.0 +0100
@@ -35,3 +35,20 @@
and edit it.
-- Lionel Elie Mamane , Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:36:26 +0100
+
+
+Additional package isdnactivecards:
+
+ With version -18 the package 'isdnactivecards' were defined only as
+ suggested package because of Debian Policy 2.2.1. This package is in
+ section contrib because it needs/uses non-free firmwares.
+
+ You should install 'isdnactivecards' only if want to use one of the
+ following (older) active ISDN cards:
+ - Eicon
+ - Eicon Diva
+ - IBM Active 2000
+ - ICN
+ - PCBIT-D
+
+ -- Joachim Wiedorn Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:03:33 +0100
Bug#692919: unblock: wicd/1.7.2.4-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package wicd. Latest upload in sid fixes RC bug #692916. Attaching diff to -3 (which was already unblocked recently). I moved the code adding users from debconf's .config to postinst; adduser was already a dependency of wicd-daemon. Also, I changed the call to getent to be a bit clearer (thanks to Vagrant on IRC). unblock wicd/1.7.2.4-4 Thanks! David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index fdfb349..1e0c95c 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +wicd (1.7.2.4-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Move user-adding code from debconf-config to wicd-daemon postinst +(Closes: #692916) + + -- David Paleino Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:41:50 +0100 + wicd (1.7.2.4-3) unstable; urgency=low * Fix debian/watch diff --git a/debian/wicd-daemon.config b/debian/wicd-daemon.config index 1622e51..d4c4e16 100755 --- a/debian/wicd-daemon.config +++ b/debian/wicd-daemon.config @@ -25,14 +25,3 @@ db_subst wicd/users users "$users" db_input high wicd/users || true db_go - -db_get wicd/users -users=$(echo $RET | sed -e 's@,@@g') - -# Add selected users -for u in $users; do - hasuser=$((getent passwd | grep -w $u) || true) - if [ -n "$hasuser" ]; then - adduser --quiet $u netdev - fi -done diff --git a/debian/wicd-daemon.postinst b/debian/wicd-daemon.postinst index 17451fd..2aa4eec 100644 --- a/debian/wicd-daemon.postinst +++ b/debian/wicd-daemon.postinst @@ -37,6 +37,16 @@ case "$1" in fi fi fi + +# Add users previously selected in debconf +db_get wicd/users +users=$(echo $RET | sed -e 's@,@@g') +for u in $users; do +hasuser=$(getent passwd $u || true) +if [ -n "$hasuser" ]; then +adduser --quiet $u netdev +fi +done ;; abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121105
On 11/10/2012 12:23 PM, intrigeri wrote: > Michael Shuler wrote (10 Nov 2012 17:52:41 GMT) : >> unblock ca-certificates/20121105 > > There are multiple instances of: > >> -CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_TRUST_UNKNOWN >> +CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_MUST_VERIFY_TRUST > > I guess that was imported from the new Mozilla certdata, but the way > debian/changelog is phrased leads me believe the only changes is > adding CA certificates, which apparently is not the case. Darn. I intended to add a comment that those lines are in the debdiff from the new certdata.txt and that they are innocuous. > Otherwise, looks good to me. Thank you for the look. -- Kind regards, Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121105
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 692911 + moreinfo Bug #692911 [release.debian.org] unblock: ca-certificates/20121105 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 692911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692911 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135257181719537.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121105
tags 692911 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Michael Shuler wrote (10 Nov 2012 17:52:41 GMT) : > unblock ca-certificates/20121105 There are multiple instances of: > -CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_TRUST_UNKNOWN > +CKA_TRUST_SERVER_AUTH CK_TRUST CKT_NSS_MUST_VERIFY_TRUST I guess that was imported from the new Mozilla certdata, but the way debian/changelog is phrased leads me believe the only changes is adding CA certificates, which apparently is not the case. Otherwise, looks good to me. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85ip9dwc55@boum.org
Processed: Re: Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #692652 [release.debian.org] unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 692652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692652 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b692652.135257134616147.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 18:49 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > Dne Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:42:59 + > "Adam D. Barratt" napsal(a): > > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > > Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache > > > > > > The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move), diff of > > > packages is attached. > > > > I might be missing something, but why was the file moved in > > to /etc/apache2/mods-available in the first place? > > You mean to /etc/php5/mods-available/? Yes, sorry; I apparently misread the patch slightly. *sigh* > Because of bug #667787 Thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1352571249.4531.25.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3
Hi Dne Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:42:59 + "Adam D. Barratt" napsal(a): > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache > > > > The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move), diff of > > packages is attached. > > I might be missing something, but why was the file moved in > to /etc/apache2/mods-available in the first place? You mean to /etc/php5/mods-available/? Because of bug #667787 -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#692911: unblock: ca-certificates/20121105
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package ca-certificates
ca-certificates/20121105 has been uploaded to unstable and includes two
important fixes for Wheezy:
ca-certificates (20121105) unstable; urgency=low
* Update mozilla/certdata.txt to version 1.86 Closes: #683728
Certificates added (+) (none removed):
+ "Actalis Authentication Root CA"
+ "Trustis FPS Root CA"
+ "StartCom Certification Authority" (renewal/rehash)
+ "StartCom Certification Authority G2"
+ "Buypass Class 2 Root CA"
+ "Buypass Class 3 Root CA"
+ "TÜRKTRUST Elektronik Sertifika Hizmet Sağlayıcısı"
+ "T-TeleSec GlobalRoot Class 3"
+ "EE Certification Centre Root CA"
* Correct piuparts package remove/purge behavior Closes: #682125
- Remove deletes of /etc/ssl{,/certs} from debian/postrm
A debdiff against the package in testing is attached. Although #683728 was
requested by Eddy Nigg at StartCom, I think it is important to include the
latest available mozilla CA bundle for Wheezy.
unblock ca-certificates/20121105
- --
Kind regards,
Michael Shuler
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=4EpY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
ca-certificates_20120623-20121105.debdiff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Processed: Re: Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #692652 [release.debian.org] unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 692652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692652 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b692652.13525694772843.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#692652: unblock: xcache/2.0.0-3
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 09:52 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > Please unblock (just uploaded) package xcache > > The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move), diff of > packages is attached. I might be missing something, but why was the file moved in to /etc/apache2/mods-available in the first place? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1352569379.4531.23.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#692767: unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed d-i Bug #692767 [release.debian.org] unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4 Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed. -- 692767: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692767 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b692767.135256812525859.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#692767: unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 18:01 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Jonas Meurer wrote (08 Nov 2012 16:31:14 GMT) : > > Only easy fixes, documentation and translation updates are included. > > I have reviewed the diff, and I agree the few proposed changes are > easy ones, don't look risky to me, and fix annoying bugs. Thanks. Ack; this would also need a d-i ack. > Minor comments follow. > > > diff -Nru cryptsetup-1.4.3/debian/README.initramfs > > cryptsetup-1.4.3/debian/README.initramfs > > --- cryptsetup-1.4.3/debian/README.initramfs2012-03-10 > > 02:06:31.0 +0100 > > +++ cryptsetup-1.4.3/debian/README.initramfs2012-11-01 > > 13:47:25.0 +0100 > [...] > > +0. enter another system(like livecd) > ^^ >Missing space > > > +1. luksOpen with the new name, change the target name to the new one > > +2. chroot into it(now, the living target name is the same as it in >^^ >Missing space "Living target name" also sounds slightly odd, imo. I'd also s/bugreport/bug report/g and s/workaround/work around/ in the introductory paragraph. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1352568026.4531.19.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#692128: marked as done (unblock: fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:03:05 +
with message-id <1352566985.4531.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#692128: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#692128: unblock:
fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #692128,
regarding unblock: fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
692128: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692128
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fonts-liberation
It is the same package as 1.07.2-5 (already in testing), but with the spurious
"Provides: ttf-liberation" field removed from fonts-liberation in
debian/control. The rationale is that some packages need the liberation fonts
and have the paths to the font files hard-coded. Since the move to the new font
package naming scheme, the path of the font files have changed from ttf-
liberation to fonts-liberation, so packages expecting ttf-liberation are *not*
satisfied when fonts-liberation is installed - thus fonts-liberation does not
Provides: ttf-liberation. Related bug: #689575.
Please find the debdiff between fonts-liberation_1.07.2-5 and 1.07.2-6
attached.
unblock fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (901, 'testing'), (502, 'unstable'), (501, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files of package fonts-liberation: lines which differ (wdiff format)
[-Provides: ttf-liberation-]
Version: [-1.07.2-5-] {+1.07.2-6+}
Control files of package ttf-liberation: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Version: [-1.07.2-5-] {+1.07.2-6+}
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 10:19 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 02.11.2012 14:26, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> > Please find the debdiff between fonts-liberation_1.07.2-5 and 1.07.2-6
> > attached.
>
> Well, I believe the debdiff attached now is a bit more meaningful than
> the previous one.
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam--- End Message ---
Bug#692767: unblock: cryptsetup/2:1.4.3-4
Hi, Jonas Meurer wrote (08 Nov 2012 16:31:14 GMT) : > Only easy fixes, documentation and translation updates are included. I have reviewed the diff, and I agree the few proposed changes are easy ones, don't look risky to me, and fix annoying bugs. Thanks. Minor comments follow. > diff -Nru cryptsetup-1.4.3/debian/README.initramfs > cryptsetup-1.4.3/debian/README.initramfs > --- cryptsetup-1.4.3/debian/README.initramfs 2012-03-10 02:06:31.0 > +0100 > +++ cryptsetup-1.4.3/debian/README.initramfs 2012-11-01 13:47:25.0 > +0100 [...] > +0. enter another system(like livecd) ^^ Missing space > +1. luksOpen with the new name, change the target name to the new one > +2. chroot into it(now, the living target name is the same as it in ^^ Missing space Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85390hxugy@boum.org
Bug#692873: marked as done (unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:58:56 +0100 with message-id <509e87d0.5010...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#692873: unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #692873, regarding unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 692873: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692873 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package epydoc. The only change is to remove one outdated file is under the non-free CC-BY-NC-SA license. This closes release-critical bug #692733 (filed yesterday, 08 Nov 2012). I have attached a debdiff below. unblock epydoc/3.0.1-13 Thanks, KEN = debdiff epydoc_3.0.1-12/epydoc_3.0.1-12.dsc epydoc_3.0.1-13/epydoc_3.0.1-13.dsc = diff -Nru epydoc-3.0.1/debian/changelog epydoc-3.0.1/debian/changelog --- epydoc-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-03-12 13:18:04.0 -0500 +++ epydoc-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-11-09 19:55:01.0 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +epydoc (3.0.1-13) unstable; urgency=low + + * Update copyright date for Debian package files in debian/copyright. + * Remove non-free doc/pycon-epydoc.html from the package (closes: #692733). +- Remove reference to doc/pycon-epydoc.html from debian/copyright +- Add new patch debian/patches/remove-cc-by-nc-sa.patch + + -- Kenneth J. Pronovici Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:35:39 -0600 + epydoc (3.0.1-12) unstable; urgency=low * Update to machine-readable debian/copyright file format, version 1.0. diff -Nru epydoc-3.0.1/debian/copyright epydoc-3.0.1/debian/copyright --- epydoc-3.0.1/debian/copyright 2012-03-12 16:31:43.0 -0500 +++ epydoc-3.0.1/debian/copyright 2012-11-09 19:55:01.0 -0600 @@ -11,12 +11,6 @@ Copyright: 2007 Daniele Varrazzo License: Expat -Files: doc/pycon-epydoc.html -Copyright: 2004 Edward Loper -License: CC-BY-NC-SA - This work (in all its forms) is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. - Files: doc/custom.css doc/docutils.css Copyright: Public Domain License: public-domain @@ -24,7 +18,7 @@ Files: debian/* Copyright: 2002 Moshe Zadka - 2003-2010 Kenneth J. Pronovici + 2003-2012 Kenneth J. Pronovici License: Copying and distribution of these files, with or without modification, is permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright notice and diff -Nru epydoc-3.0.1/debian/patches/remove-cc-by-sc-na.patch epydoc-3.0.1/debian/patches/remove-cc-by-sc-na.patch --- epydoc-3.0.1/debian/patches/remove-cc-by-sc-na.patch1969-12-31 18:00:00.0 -0600 +++ epydoc-3.0.1/debian/patches/remove-cc-by-sc-na.patch2012-11-09 19:55:01.0 -0600 @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +# Description: Remove files licensed under the non-free CC-BY-NC-SA license. +# Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/692733 +# Author: Kenneth J. Pronovici +--- a/doc/pycon-epydoc.html /dev/null +@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@ +- +- +- +-Epydoc: PyCon 2004 +- +- +- +- +- Epydoc: PyCon 2004 +- +-Abstract +- +- Epydoc is a tool for generating API documentation for Python +-modules, based on their docstrings. It supports several output +-formats (including HTML and PDF), and understands four different +-markup languages (Epytext, Javadoc, reStructuredText, and plaintext). +-A wide variety of fields can be used to supply specific +-information about individual objects, such as descriptions of function +-parameters, type signatures, and groupings of related objects. +- +- Presentation and Paper +- +- +- +-Video (Quicktime) +-Audio (MP3) +-Slides +-Paper +- +- +- +- http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc-large.mov"; +- >Large (Fast DSL) +- +- http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc-64kbps.mp3"; +- >High Quality (64 kbps) +- +- Acrobat (PDF) +- +- Acrobat (PDF) +- +- +- +- http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc.mov"; +- >Medium (Slow DSL) +- +- http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc.mp3"; +- >Low Quality (16 kbps) +- +- Powerpoint (PPT) +- +- PostScript (PS) +- +- +- +- http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc-small.mov"; +- >Small (Modem) +- +- +- +- +- +- +- +- Copyright
Bug#692790: marked as done (unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-1)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:57:32 + with message-id <1352566652.4531.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#692790: unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #692790, regarding unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 692790: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692790 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock icedtea-web (1.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=high * IcedTea-Web 1.3.1 release. * Security Updates - CVE-2012-4540: Heap-based buffer overflow after triggering event attached to applet. * Common - PR1161: X509VariableTrustManager does not work correctly with OpenJDK7. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 22:56 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > icedtea-web (1.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=high > > * IcedTea-Web 1.3.1 release. > * Security Updates > - CVE-2012-4540: Heap-based buffer overflow after triggering event > attached to applet. > * Common > - PR1161: X509VariableTrustManager does not work correctly with > OpenJDK7. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam--- End Message ---
Bug#690464: marked as done (unblock: dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:00:54 +0100 with message-id <509e8846.50...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#690464: has caused the Debian Bug report #690464, regarding unblock: dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690464 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear release team, There is a bug (#561678) causing lot of extra work to security and release teams and the maintainer has not been very responsive lately. I was wondering uploading a nmu with the diff attached would be considered for unblocking and could make it to the wheezy release. Thank you and please, think of the children. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/dcut.1 dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dcut.1 --- dput-0.9.6.3/dcut.1 2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 + +++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dcut.1 2012-10-14 16:40:16.0 +0100 @@ -160,6 +160,19 @@ -END PGP SIGNATURE- .fi +If you've uploaded packages with the --delayed option (uploaded to +\fBDEFERRED\fR queue), then use the \fBcancel\fR command with a .changes +file. + +.in +4n +.nf +$ dcut cancel dput_0.9.4_i386.changes +.fi + +.in +This creates and uploads a commands file just like the other commands. +.nf + .SH LICENSE This program is distributed under the terms of the Gnu General Public License, Version 2 or later. diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/debian/changelog dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/debian/changelog --- dput-0.9.6.3/debian/changelog 2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 + +++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 16:22:48.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +dput (0.9.6.3+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Discourage people to upload packages to the wrong archive (Closes: #561678) + * Deleted obsolete comment about gluck (Closes: #674585) + * Use case and example about dcut added to man page. Thanks +Hideki Yamane (Closes: #688871) + + -- Alberto Á. Fuentes Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:04:37 +0100 + dput (0.9.6.3) unstable; urgency=low * volatile archive has been discontinued (Closes: #661374) diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/dput.cf dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dput.cf --- dput-0.9.6.3/dput.cf 2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 + +++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dput.cf 2012-10-14 13:54:17.0 +0100 @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ login = anonymous allow_dcut = 1 method = ftp +# Please, upload your package to the proper archive +# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload +allowed_distributions = (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports) # http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/05/msg00036.html [ftp-eu] @@ -31,6 +34,9 @@ incoming = /pub/UploadQueue/ login = anonymous allow_dcut = 1 +# Please, upload your package to the proper archive +# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload +allowed_distributions = (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports) # http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg7.html [ssh-upload] @@ -40,6 +46,9 @@ method = scp incoming = /srv/upload.debian.org/UploadQueue/ allow_dcut = 1 +# Please, upload your package to the proper archive +# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload +allowed_distributions = (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports) # And if you want to override one of the defaults, add it here. # For example, comment out the next line @@ -72,9 +81,6 @@ incoming = /pub/Incoming/upload login = anonymous -### Delayed Upload queue will move off gluck. -### please use [ftp-master] (aka ftp.upload.debian.org) - [backports] fqdn = backports-master.debian.org method = ftp --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2012-11-10 17:23, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > alberto fuentes wrote (20 Oct 2012 13:51:22 GMT) : >> The nmu is already in unstable > > ... and according to interdiff, > the "d" output matches what Alberto initially proposed, > and about which Julien wrote: > >> Looks ok to me. > > => adding the hint looks like the way to go: > > unblock dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1 > > Cheers, > -- > intrigeri > | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intr
Bug#692873: unblock: epydoc/3.0.1-13
Control: tags 692733 + fixed pending On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:37:46PM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Le 09/11/2012 22:31, Kenneth Pronovici a écrit : > > > Please unblock package epydoc. The only change is to remove one > > outdated file is under the non-free CC-BY-NC-SA license. This closes > > release-critical bug #692733 > > You need to strip out the non-free file from the source tarball, and > prepare a repacked one (e.g. 3.0.1+dfsg). Your patch only removes the > non-free file when applying the patch, but it's still present in the > source package. Ok, I have repackaged the upstream tarball and uploaded 3.0.1+dfsg-1. Below is a debdiff between 3.0.1-12 and 3.0.1+dfsg-1. Thanks, KEN -- debdiff epydoc_3.0.1-12/epydoc_3.0.1-12.dsc epydoc_3.0.1+dfsg-1/epydoc_3.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc diff -Nru epydoc-3.0.1/debian/changelog epydoc-3.0.1+dfsg/debian/changelog --- epydoc-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-03-12 13:18:04.0 -0500 +++ epydoc-3.0.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-11-10 10:18:09.0 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,21 @@ +epydoc (3.0.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Package a new DFSG-free upstream tarball (closes: #692733). +- The new tarball removes non-free doc/pycon-epydoc.html +- Remove debian/patches/remove-cc-by-nc-sa.patch; no longer needed +- Add opts=dversionmangle in debian/watch per Lintian recommendation + + -- Kenneth J. Pronovici Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:04:44 + + +epydoc (3.0.1-13) unstable; urgency=low + + * Update copyright date for Debian package files in debian/copyright. + * Remove non-free doc/pycon-epydoc.html from the package (closes: #692733). +- Remove reference to doc/pycon-epydoc.html from debian/copyright +- Add new patch debian/patches/remove-cc-by-nc-sa.patch + + -- Kenneth J. Pronovici Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:35:39 -0600 + epydoc (3.0.1-12) unstable; urgency=low * Update to machine-readable debian/copyright file format, version 1.0. diff -Nru epydoc-3.0.1/debian/copyright epydoc-3.0.1+dfsg/debian/copyright --- epydoc-3.0.1/debian/copyright 2012-03-12 16:31:43.0 -0500 +++ epydoc-3.0.1+dfsg/debian/copyright 2012-11-09 19:55:01.0 -0600 @@ -11,12 +11,6 @@ Copyright: 2007 Daniele Varrazzo License: Expat -Files: doc/pycon-epydoc.html -Copyright: 2004 Edward Loper -License: CC-BY-NC-SA - This work (in all its forms) is licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. - Files: doc/custom.css doc/docutils.css Copyright: Public Domain License: public-domain @@ -24,7 +18,7 @@ Files: debian/* Copyright: 2002 Moshe Zadka - 2003-2010 Kenneth J. Pronovici + 2003-2012 Kenneth J. Pronovici License: Copying and distribution of these files, with or without modification, is permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright notice and diff -Nru epydoc-3.0.1/debian/watch epydoc-3.0.1+dfsg/debian/watch --- epydoc-3.0.1/debian/watch 2011-03-02 08:58:31.0 -0600 +++ epydoc-3.0.1+dfsg/debian/watch 2012-11-10 10:17:28.0 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ # This watch file uses the qa.debian.org redirector so that SourceForge URLs work version=3 +opts=dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg// \ http://sf.net/epydoc/epydoc-(.*)\.tar\.gz diff -Nru epydoc-3.0.1/doc/pycon-epydoc.html epydoc-3.0.1+dfsg/doc/pycon-epydoc.html --- epydoc-3.0.1/doc/pycon-epydoc.html 2008-01-30 08:13:59.0 -0600 +++ epydoc-3.0.1+dfsg/doc/pycon-epydoc.html 1969-12-31 18:00:00.0 -0600 @@ -1,103 +0,0 @@ - - - -Epydoc: PyCon 2004 - - - - - Epydoc: PyCon 2004 - -Abstract - - Epydoc is a tool for generating API documentation for Python -modules, based on their docstrings. It supports several output -formats (including HTML and PDF), and understands four different -markup languages (Epytext, Javadoc, reStructuredText, and plaintext). -A wide variety of fields can be used to supply specific -information about individual objects, such as descriptions of function -parameters, type signatures, and groupings of related objects. - - Presentation and Paper - - - -Video (Quicktime) -Audio (MP3) -Slides -Paper - - - - http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc-large.mov"; - >Large (Fast DSL) - - http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc-64kbps.mp3"; - >High Quality (64 kbps) - - Acrobat (PDF) - - Acrobat (PDF) - - - - http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc.mov"; - >Medium (Slow DSL) - - http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc.mp3"; - >Low Quality (16 kbps) - - Powerpoint (PPT) - - PostScript (PS) - - - - http://www.pycon.org/dc2004/talks/files/epydoc/pycon-epydoc-small.mov"; - >Small (Modem) - - - - - - - - Copyright © 2004 Edward Loper. This work (in all its forms) is -licensed under the Creative Commons http://creativecommons.or
Bug#692370: unblock: libconfig-model-approx-perl/1.005-1
Hi,
Dominique Dumont wrote (05 Nov 2012 12:43:49 GMT) :
> unblock libconfig-model-approx-perl/1.005-1
This includes a big amount of boilerplate / format / ordering changes.
To review the proposed update, one has to ensure each of these
non-minimal changes does not cause any functional change.
I gave it a try, and after a while I was bored and gave up. I'm sorry,
but e.g. the move to Dist::Zilla was perhaps not the best thing to
include in a package before asking for a freeze exception...
Here are a few comments, though:
> --- libconfig-model-approx-perl-1.004/debian/control 2011-06-30
> 16:04:14.0 +0200
> +++ libconfig-model-approx-perl-1.005/debian/control 2012-11-03
> 16:01:37.0 +0100
[...]
> Package: libconfig-model-approx-perl
[...]
> +Depends: ${perl:Depends},
> + ${misc:Depends},
> + libconfig-model-perl (>= 1.245),
I'm under the impression that debian/control was not updated to match
e.g. the bumped versioned dependency on Config::Model. Perhaps it's
not an isolated case.
> + migriate older configurations without user interaction (cme migrate
s/migriate/migrate/
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85fw4hxv7x@boum.org
Bug#690464:
Hi, alberto fuentes wrote (20 Oct 2012 13:51:22 GMT) : > The nmu is already in unstable ... and according to interdiff, the "d" output matches what Alberto initially proposed, and about which Julien wrote: > Looks ok to me. => adding the hint looks like the way to go: unblock dput/0.9.6.3+nmu1 Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85txsxxw9m@boum.org
Bug#683792: unblock: libseccomp/1.0.0-1
Adam D. Barratt wrote (04 Aug 2012 09:56:26 GMT) : > For the record: the new package is therefore currently in NEW. Still true. Kees Cook wrote: > I'd like to have this 1.0.0 version in Debian for easier development > work for people wanting to use libseccomp going forward. I am not sure I exactly get the usecase for this unblock request. Is it developers who will need the -dev package to compile their new software with seccomp features in? (Those probably can easily install 1.0.0-1 from the backports, if it does not make it into Wheezy.) Is it users who would want to install third-party software that was compiled against the libseccomp 1.0 ABI? Anything else? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85bof5zbfy@boum.org
Bug#692128: unblock: fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6
Hi, > unblock fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6 Looks good, since the ttf-liberation transitional package ships compatibility symlinks. Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85wqxtzc4k@boum.org
Processed: Re: Bug#689706: unblock: gpa/0.9.3-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 689706 + moreinfo Bug #689706 [release.debian.org] unblock: gpa/0.9.3-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689706 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13525612479837.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#689706: unblock: gpa/0.9.3-1
tags 689706 + moreinfo thanks Hi, Daniel Leidert wrote (05 Oct 2012 10:50:17 GMT) : > So what is your opinion? Can we agree on uploading gpa 0.9.3 to > unstable and unblocking this version or do you reject this request? > If you agree, I would upload and then downgrade severity of #634930. How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into current testing's gpa? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85a9up1nsf@boum.org
Processed: Re: Bug#690075: unblock: dnsmasq/2.63-4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 690075 + moreinfo Bug #690075 [release.debian.org] unblock: dnsmasq/2.63-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 690075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690075 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13525602743600.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#690075: unblock: dnsmasq/2.63-4
tags 690075 + moreinfo thanks Hi Moritz, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote (09 Oct 2012 17:51:26 GMT) : > Please unblock package dnsmasq > It fixes CVE-2012-3411 > unblock dnsmasq/2.63-4 The new upstream version includes quite a few changes that are unrelated to the security fix, which probably partly explains why nobody reviewed the proposed changes yet. However, determining which exact set of patches should be backported from upstream to fix this issue is not trivial, and I guess that's why Moritz asks for the whole think to be unblocked: 54dd393 (Add --bind-dynamic) is obvious, but a few follow-up commits come to fix the problems brought by the initial implementation; at least these two ones seem needed: * 2b5bae9 -- Fall back from --bind-dynamic to --bind-interfaces in BSD, rather than quitting * 5f11b3e -- Cope with --listen-address for not yet existent addr in bind-dynamic mode ... and I would not bet that's enough. Simon, are you interested in listing the commits that are needed, on top of 2.62-3, to fix CVE-2012-3411 without breaking anything? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85390h334f@boum.org
Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:12:56 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > The upstream ticket corresponding to this issue is > https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=74252 > > It seems to me the actual issue that patch fixes only may impact the > test suite of other modules that check for unexpected warnings. AFAIK, > Lucas' archive rebuilds did not detect any FTBFS caused by this bug in > Debian, so I would say it's low priority. Fellow debian-perl members, > did you see any? I don't remember any problems either. The CPAN ticket mentions as broken modules: - CPAN::Digger: not in Debian - Module::CPANTS::Analyse: here we repackage the dist and don't run all tests, and it still builds Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Rebekka Bakken: As Tears Clear Our Eyes signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688080: unblock: tomoyo-tools/2.5.0-2012-0414-10
Hi, (disclaimer: I'm not a member of the release team.) Hideki Yamane wrote (16 Oct 2012 20:03:34 GMT) : > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:45:14 +0100 > "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: >> > +To enable Tomoyo as the MAC security, please specify parameter to >> > the kernel. >> > +By default, it will be done by package. >> >> That doesn't appear to be accurate, given: >> >> > +Template: tomoyo-tools/grub >> > +Type: boolean >> > +Default: false >> > +_Description: Enable TOMOYO Linux at boot time? > Well, users just answer "yes" with debconf, I mean. I believe that Adam means that in the "By default, it will be done by package" sentence introduced by the proposed change, the *By default* part is not matched by the actual implementation. After a glance at the diff, I can only concur: doing something by default is quite different from doing it iff. the user chooses a non-default answer to a medium-priority debconf question. Anyhow, the current implementation looks incomplete and quite fragile to me: > +if [ $RET = true ]; then > +sed -e > s/^GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=\"\"/GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=\"security=tomoyo\"/ \ > +-i /etc/default/grub && update-grub > +elif [ $RET = false ]; then > +sed -e > s/^GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=\"security=tomoyo\"/^GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=\"\"/ \ > +-i /etc/default/grub && update-grub > +fi Unless I'm mistaken, this code: * basically assumes it's the only one to manage GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX, which is untrue: grub-pc maintainer scripts manage /etc/default/grub with ucf * assumes GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX is initially empty, which may not be the case * does not support removing security=tomoyo in case other settings where added by the administrator (same in tomoyo-tools.postrm) (FTR, this kind of difficulties are why I did not introduce a similar semi-automatic enabling feature in the AppArmor package yet.) I think bugs should be filed against the version in unstable to track this issues. Once they are fixed, then an additional issue will arise: the code should also make sure only one security= parameter is passed to Linux. Therefore, I don't think the proposed update is suitable for testing at this time of the Wheezy release process. I recommend the release team rejects this request. Anyway, it would be awesome if the code and comments were fixed in unstable at some point. Unfortunately, I guess that will be too late for Wheezy. > Users should check package's README.Debian and modify > /etc/default/grub and run update-grub by hand if it's not > introduced this change. For better user friendly package, I want it > put to Wheezy. I appreciate your concern about usability. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85k3tt342s@boum.org
Bug#691098: marked as done (unblock: mumble/1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1 [pre-approval request])
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:34:26 + with message-id <1352558066.4531.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#691098: unblock: mumble/1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1 [pre-approval request] has caused the Debian Bug report #691098, regarding unblock: mumble/1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1 [pre-approval request] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691098 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock I'd like to request a pre-approval for a future unblock of a not-yet-uploaded NMU of mumble. This NMU, prepared by Chris Knadle, would fix #675971, thereby implementing the TC decision in #682010. Chris' changes are in the attached mumble-celt.diff. Unfortunately unstable already has a newer version than testing; but on the bright side, the changes already in unstable are required, since mumble in testing currently doesn't build [0] and also fails to start [1], and also closes RC bugs #678759 [2], #676815, #676816. (So going through t-p-u for #675971 doesn't work, since that would also mean including the fixes for the 3 other RC bugs). I'm attaching the full debdiff wheezy/1.2.3-348-g317f5a0-1 → "proposed-sid"/1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1 as mumble-wheezy-sid.diff. Thanks in advance, gregor [0] In file included from /usr/include/Ice/LocalObjectF.h:15:0, from ./Murmur.h:24, from MurmurI.h:4, from MurmurIce.h:42, from MurmurIce.cpp:33: /usr/include/Ice/Handle.h: In instantiation of 'IceInternal::Handle::Handle(T*) [with T = Ice::Communicator]': /usr/include/Ice/OutgoingAsync.h:49:16: required from here /usr/include/Ice/Handle.h:66:13: error: 'upCast' was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive] compilation terminated due to -Wfatal-errors. This is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675971#131 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672066#54 and [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675955 [2] also seen at http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/10/10/mumble_1.2.3-348-g317f5a0-1_wheezy.log -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Sophie Hunger: Teenage Spirit diff -Nru mumble-1.2.3-349-g315b5f5/debian/changelog mumble-1.2.3-349-g315b5f5/debian/changelog --- mumble-1.2.3-349-g315b5f5/debian/changelog 2012-07-08 13:42:05.0 -0400 +++ mumble-1.2.3-349-g315b5f5/debian/changelog 2012-10-04 21:03:18.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,31 @@ +mumble (1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix "Cannot communicate with the vast majority of Mumble servers due +to lack of required baseline codec": +re-enable using the bundled celt library: + debian/patches/series: + - add 07-use-embedded-celt-baseline patch + debian/patches/07-use-embedded-celt-baseline: + - build Celt 0.7.1 and not 0.11.0 + debian/mumble.install: + - ship Celt 0.7.1 library from the embedded source + debian/rules: + - re-enable Celt using the bundled 0.7.1 version + debian/patches/20-add-opus-threshold-option: + - fix src/murmur/Meta.cpp to set default iOpusThreshold=100 to only + switch from Celt to Opus if 100% of connected clients support Opus + (instead of 1%) + - fix murmur.ini example for opusthreshold option to =100 + (instead of =1) + - add #opusthreshold=100 comments to murmur.ini.system (shipped as + etc/mumble-server.ini) to match murmur.ini example +Closes: #675971. +This implements the TC decision in #682010. +[Thanks to Gregor Hermann for his help and guidance.] + + -- Christopher Knadle Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:45:05 -0400 + mumble (1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2) unstable; urgency=low * Drop the hard dep on boost-1.46, that's been removed now. Closes: #678759 diff -Nru mumble-1.2.3-349-g315b5f5/debian/mumble.install mumble-1.2.3-349-g315b5f5/debian/mumble.install --- mumble-1.2.3-349-g315b5f5/debian/mumble.install 2012-07-08 13:42:05.0 -0400 +++ mumble-1.2.3-349-g315b5f5/debian/mumble.install 2012-10-04 21:02:08.000
Bug#683445: One more try
Hi Anton, Anton Gladky wrote (21 Sep 2012 19:57:04 GMT) : > Dear release team, (Disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team.) > the license problem of GMSH is resolved [1], the upstream > kindly agreed to add a license exception. > Please, consider adding this package (version 2.6.1.dfsg-4 in > unstable) into Wheezy. I understand, that is, probably, too late for > adding "new" packages, but it would be frustrating for many > engineers and scientist not to find this program in the future > stable release. If I understand clearly, the last version that was part of testing was 2.5.1~beta2~svn10284~dfsg-1, while the current candidate is 2.6.1.dfsg-4. Moreover, the removal happened in February. If there was a smaller delta between these two versions, such as "only change since removal is license fix", and a bit less delay between the removal and the unblock request, then I'd be happy to express my support for this unblock request, but here it really looks like adding a new package to testing. The request at hand is waaay outside of the exceptions described by Rule #8. So, personally, I don't think it's a good idea to unblock this package at this time of the Wheezy release cycle. I'm sorry, and I hope this package is not too much of a pain to maintain in stable backports. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85vcdd359u@boum.org
Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1
Hi, Adam D. Barratt wrote (13 Oct 2012 15:06:42 GMT) : >> Old file-mmagic uses deprecated perl syntax, so I want to unblock it. >> The follwing is diff (really small changes): >> http://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=286&r2=279 (That's the diff from "somewhere in between 1.27 and 1.28" to 1.29...) > The upstream diff for that particular fix might be really small > and targeted. It is. The revision that fixes this specific bug is 281: http://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=279&r2=281 It is really tiny and looks correct to me. It might be a fine candidate for 1.27-2 and tpu if someone cares enough. The upstream ticket corresponding to this issue is https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=74252 It seems to me the actual issue that patch fixes only may impact the test suite of other modules that check for unexpected warnings. AFAIK, Lucas' archive rebuilds did not detect any FTBFS caused by this bug in Debian, so I would say it's low priority. Fellow debian-perl members, did you see any? Another bugfix that might be useful to include in Wheezy is r279 (memory leak fix): http://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=278&r2=279 Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85bof54kd3@boum.org
Re: Way for package chrony with its RC
Hi Joachim, Le 06/11/2012 15:06, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit : > I care about the package chrony: There is a new upstream version in > unstable which didn't go into testing before freeze. But for some > days there is a RC bug which should be solved. > > How is the right way to update the testing version? You should prepare an upload to testing-proposed-updates with just the RC-bug fix, and contact the release-team (preferably via a bug report against release.debian.org) with a debdiff against the version in Wheezy. Regards David signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#690949: unblock: torbutton/1.4.6.3-1
Hi, Jérémy Bobbio wrote (19 Oct 2012 12:45:44 GMT) : > Please unblock package torbutton. See #690658: the version currently > in Wheezy will simply make Iceweasel crash since the later has been > updated. This should not be needed for the stable lifetime of Wheezy, once #690729 is fixed (iceweasel: Please add a 'Breaks: xul-ext-torbutton' in the next ESR upload), as Lunar^ rightfully would rather not ship torbutton in Wheezy. However, for current users of testing, such as users who are upgrading from Squeeze, I think it's totally worth providing the proposed torbutton. This would ensure: 1. they have a usable iceweasel again 2. they are aware of the serious anonymity issues caused by the new ESR incompatibility with torbutton, and suggested alternative solutions. The current situation can be summed up as "false impression of security", which is clearly not satisfying. The 1.4.6.3 code changes are bugfixes, comments and translations, and a single new feature (improved support of transparent proxying) whose implementation mostly boils down to new configuration settings handling. I don't know enough JavaScript to pretend I have seriously reviewed the diff, but I've read it all, and it seems to make sense. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85pq3l4m0o@boum.org
Bug#691742: unblock: fs2ram/0.3.12
Hi, Philippe Le Brouster wrote (31 Oct 2012 10:06:04 GMT) : > Le lundi 29 octobre 2012 à 19:04 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit: >> As you mentioned above, testing currently has 0.3.10. The relevant >> diff is thus 0.3.10 to 0.3.12, not from 0.3.11. > Here are the information from 0.3.10 to 0.3.12 : I'm not in the mood to review the whole thing entirely again now, but FWIW I've upgraded to 0.3.11 as soon as it was out to fix #649179, and at this time I had reviewed the entire 0.3.10..0.3.11 code changes (I've been keeping an eye on this project for a while) and they looked good. So, in case it may be useful, here's my review for 0.3.11..0.3.12: basically, all right, modulo the newly introduced "it is preferable to set the variables RAMTMP, RAMLOCK from /etc/default/tmpfs" comment that seems a bit unclear to me: I think s/from/in/ would tell me more clearly what I should do. Probably not a blocker, though. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/854nkx61nu@boum.org
Bug#692879: tpu: package rkward 0.5.7-3
Hi, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote (10 Nov 2012 11:15:16 GMT) : > I have uploaded corrected files (including unified diff, > old->new) to the same location as before: > http://rkward.sourceforge.net/debian/0.5.7-3/ FWIW, the new changes_0.5.7_2_3.diff looks good to me. (Disclaimer: I'm not part of the release team. Merely trying to help a bit.) Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85obj563dk@boum.org
Way for package chrony with its RC
Hello release team, hello John, I care about the package chrony: There is a new upstream version in unstable which didn't go into testing before freeze. But for some days there is a RC bug which should be solved. How is the right way to update the testing version? I could create an update of this package with the old upstream version 1.24. But it cannot be uploaded to unstable, right? --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121106200613.34e84...@jupiter.home
Bug#692879: tpu: package rkward 0.5.7-3
Hi! On Saturday 10 November 2012, intrigeri wrote: > > Files: rkward/qwinhost.cpp.orig rkward/qwinhost.cpp > > rkward/qwinhost.h.orig rkward/qwinhost.h > > These paths don't look correct to me. > I suggest s,rkward/,rkward/qwinhost/, Good catch, thanks! I have uploaded corrected files (including unified diff, old->new) to the same location as before: http://rkward.sourceforge.net/debian/0.5.7-3/ Regards Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#691647: unblock: schroot/1.6.4-1
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:24:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:53:08PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:28AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > Please unblock package schroot > > > > > > I have uploaded schroot 1.6.4-1 to unstable. This contains some > > > documentation for wheezy upgrade issues, plus some fixes for > > > serious and important bugs in wheezy: > > > > I had to make an additional 3 line change to fix building on > > hurd and kfreebsd (attached) > > And an additional change to allow for symlinks in paths on the > host. > > unblock schroot/1.6.4-3 I do have a further portablity patch for kfreebsd: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=buildd-tools/schroot.git;a=commitdiff;h=73f9ab7ff14c348c262813fdd454132edf45ef5a http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=buildd-tools/schroot.git;a=commitdiff;h=9bc4e6abef18fcb16ba8bf579dfa6946657cbfac but I was holding off on uploading it without any feedback regarding the above unblock request. This patch is needed to allow sbuild to work on kfreebsd. Without it, there are no device nodes (fatal) and no scratch space for building. Thanks, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `-GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121110102310.gg...@codelibre.net
Bug#692879: tpu: package rkward 0.5.7-3
Hi Thomas, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote (10 Nov 2012 09:25:29 GMT) : > For your convenience, I have also prepared a recursive diff between > the unpacked and patched source trees of 0.5.7-2 and 0.5.7-3 ([5]). That may be only me nitpicking, but from my humble reviewer point-of-view: - a unified diff (-u) is easier to read - passing files to compare in the "$ORIG $NEW" order makes the resulting patch easier to read > Files: rkward/qwinhost.cpp.orig rkward/qwinhost.cpp rkward/qwinhost.h.orig > rkward/qwinhost.h These paths don't look correct to me. I suggest s,rkward/,rkward/qwinhost/, Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85vcdd6b4y@boum.org
Bug#692879: tpu: package rkward 0.5.7-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tpu A bug report[1] concerning omissions in debian/copyright was filed against the version of rkward in testing (0.5.7-2). Meanwhile, due to somewhat imperfect communication, I have already uploaded a new upstream version (0.6.0-1) to unstable. It should be noted that there has been some controversy about the scope and severity of the bug (see the bug report log, and threads [2] and [3] for details). Nonetheless, debian/copyright in rkward 0.5.7-2 is certainly buggy, and the fix is trivial from a technical point of view. Thus I would like to ask permission to upload a fixed package to testing-proposed-updates. You can preview my proposed upload at [4]. For your convenience, I have also prepared a recursive diff between the unpacked and patched source trees of 0.5.7-2 and 0.5.7-3 ([5]). As you can see, only debian/changelog and debian/copyright have been changed. Thanks! Thomas [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689982 [2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/11/msg00012.html [3]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2012/11/msg0.html [4]: http://rkward.sourceforge.net/debian/0.5.7-3/ [5]: http://rkward.sourceforge.net/debian/0.5.7-3/changes_0.5.7_2_3.diff signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#687492: marked as done (unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve))
Your message dated Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:54:30 +
with message-id <1352534070.4531.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687492: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)
has caused the Debian Bug report #687492,
regarding unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
687492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687492
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package aptitude (pre-approve)
The last serious change required for aptitude + multi-arch is to
improve the command line handling. I refer you to [1] and [2] for the
complete details. At the moment most commands do not support a very
useful syntax for multi-arch and are variously inconsistent with their
documented behaviour, each other, and the apt-utils.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/685731
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/687474
The fixes for this have been in experimental since July. The minor
update presented here contains some of those needed to support the
rest in the next release.
I fully expect that next release to be the last one required to have
an aptitude with acceptable multi-arch support in Wheezy.
Changelog:
* [all]: Support for matching architectures using specification
strings and wildcards (for example, "linux-any"). See
Debian Policy section 11.1 "Architecture specification
strings" for more details.
The support for this is available in libapt-pkg. The apt-utils
support this syntax. This update is limited to ?architecture search
terms, and command line support (“pkg:linux-*”) next release.
Backported from experimental.
* [cmdline]: Fix typo which prevented installing tasks using the
apt-get compatible syntax ("aptitude install
gnome-desktop^").
Minor fix. Makes command line syntax (of install at least) more
compatible with apt-utils. From experimental.
* [cmdline]: Do not assume that APT::Default-Release always provides
the candidate version of a package, instead use the
policy defined by apt_preferences(5).
(Closes: #587775, #631464, #686316)
This is the behaviour documented in aptitude(8), broken at some point
in the past. This is a non-invasive change that greatly improves the
consistency of the commands with each other and apt-utils. Also from
experimental.
* aptitude-doc-en:
- Update for default value of APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant
which is "true" since apt 0.8.15.3. (Closes: #685310)
- Correctly reference APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant and
SuggestsImportant which do not contain any hyphens.
(Closes: #579071)
Trivial fixes to the documentation.
* Translation updates:
- Czech (Closes: #681693)
- French (Closes: #680040, #685084)
- Polish (Closes: #678153)
- Russian (Closes: #686016)
- Spanish (Closes: #686752)
* Depend on newer version of libapt-pkg-dev for architecture
specification string support.
* Use xz compression for all binaries. (Closes: #687294)
Sundry.
That concludes the changes covered in the attached debdiff.
You will note that the debdiff contains:
--- aptitude-0.6.8.1/po/POTFILES.in 2012-08-28 11:09:24.0 +0800
+++ aptitude-0.6.8.2/po/POTFILES.in 2012-09-13 16:15:12.0 +0800
@@ -111,8 +111,6 @@
src/generic/apt/aptitude_resolver_universe.h
src/generic/apt/apt_undo_group.cc
src/generic/apt/apt_undo_group.h
-src/generic/apt/cacheset.cc
-src/generic/apt/cacheset.h
src/generic/apt/changelog_parse.cc
src/generic/apt/changelog_parse.h
src/generic/apt/config_signal.cc
The two cacheset files never were released. They made their way in to
POTFILES while developing during the last cycle.
I have also attached another patch which is entirely optional, but of
notable value to end users and relatively non-invasive. It brings in
support for APT::Changelogs::Server which apt-cache and others have
been using for some time. Previously we hardcoded the default value
of that. Please also consider this patch and give it an ACK for
inclusion if this is ok.
Thanking you in advance for your time and consideration.
unblock aptitude/0.6.8.2-1
diff -Nru --exclude changelog --exclude 'configure*' --exclude NEWS --exclude '*.xml' --exclude '*.gmo' --exclude '*.po' --exclude '*.pot' --exclude 'aptitude-defaults.*' --exclude 'help*.txt' aptitude-0.6.8.1/debian/control aptitude-
