Bug#688966: Review midgard2-core package

2013-03-03 Thread Timo Jyrinki 
04.03.2013 00:54, intrigeri kirjoitti:
>  "I am not sure due to #688966.
>   If midgard2-core is accepted to stable, then php5-midgard2
>   might break."
> 
> If midgard2-core "might break" another package that's currently in
> testing, then IMHO this should be expressed in terms of binary package
> dependencies, and perhaps it should be made explicit that the unblock
> request for midgard2-core should be considered in lockstep with the
> unblock request for php5-midgard2 if that's actually the case?

It seems php5-midgard2 binary package currently depends on libmidgard2,
while this midgard2-core packaging fix renames the library to
libmidgard2-2010.05.

So, php5-midgard2 would need just a rebuild to pick up the new library
name, together with uploading of midgard2-core. The mentors link of
php5-midgard2 has expired, but if I recall correctly Piotr had only
indeed put it there with a changelog entry like "rebuild", so there are
no actual packaging changes needed.

-Timo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51345034.1060...@iki.fi

Bug#698117: unblock: rebuildd/0.4.2

2013-03-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog 
Hi,

On Mon, 04 Mar 2013, intrigeri wrote:
> Given these concerns and the fact time happened to go on flying since
> Julien Cristau expressed these, at this point of the release process,
> I think the only way to ship rebuildd in Wheezy would be to prepare
> a t-p-u upload with only the minimal bugfix for the RC bug.
> 
> Julien (Danjou), are you interested in preparing and testing such
> a package, that the release team could then review and probably
> pre-approve?
> 
> (Also Cc'ing Raphaël, who might be interested in doing this work if
> Julien has no time to do so.)

rebuildd is the kind of fringe package that has no reverse-dependency
and that can always safely be removed if anything turns out wrong. I'd
rather that 0.4.2 be accepted despite the large diff.

0.4.2 has had enough testing in unstable (8 months, like the entire
freeze!) and it's a rather safe option IMO. I have been actively using
that version on two arm build daemons that I run without problems.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130304071453.gg22...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com

Re: Uploading new s3ql to testing-proposed-updates

2013-03-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 17:49 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Ok, I updated severity and tags of the bug and uploaded a new version
> to unstable that fixes the issue there. 

Thanks.

> I have put the proposed update for testing on mentors.debian.net: 
> 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.11.1-3.dsc 

fwiw "1.11.1-2+deb7u1" would be a more conventional version number here;
-3 works so long as there's never been a package using that version
before, though.

> What else do I need to do? 

Please could you post a debdiff to this thread?

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1362378690.11072.62.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#702206: marked as done (unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13)

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Mon, 04 Mar 2013 06:14:18 +
with message-id <1362377658.11072.59.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702206: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #702206,
regarding unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
702206: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702206
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package graphviz

  Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: #701832)

unblock graphviz/2.26.3-13

diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog
--- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog2012-07-10 15:37:19.0 -0700
+++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog2013-03-03 17:00:51.0 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+graphviz (2.26.3-13) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ David Claughton ]
+  * Add 'fontfaq.txt' file to graphviz-doc package 
+
+  [ Christoph Egger ]
+  * Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: 
#701832)
+
+ -- David Claughton   Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:10:00 +0100
+
 graphviz (2.26.3-12) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fixes to explicitly use ruby 1.8 as default for ruby is now 1.9
diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/graphviz-doc.install 
graphviz-2.26.3/debian/graphviz-doc.install
--- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/graphviz-doc.install 2012-07-10 15:36:38.0 
-0700
+++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/graphviz-doc.install 2013-03-03 16:58:05.0 
-0800
@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@
 usr/share/graphviz/doc/ChangeLog usr/share/doc/graphviz
 usr/share/graphviz/doc/Dot.ref   usr/share/doc/graphviz
 usr/share/graphviz/doc/latex_suggestions.txt usr/share/doc/graphviz
-
+usr/share/graphviz/doc/fontfaq.txt usr/share/doc/graphviz
diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/kfreebsd-hang.patch 
graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/kfreebsd-hang.patch
--- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/kfreebsd-hang.patch  1969-12-31 
16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/kfreebsd-hang.patch  2013-03-03 
16:59:53.0 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Index: graphviz-2.26.3/lib/gvc/gvconfig.c
+===
+--- graphviz-2.26.3.orig/lib/gvc/gvconfig.c2013-03-03 17:26:23.0 
+
 graphviz-2.26.3/lib/gvc/gvconfig.c 2013-03-03 17:29:41.235960554 +
+@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@
+ #else
+   /* this only works on linux, other systems will get GVLIBDIR only */
+   libdir = GVLIBDIR;
++#ifdef linux
+   f = fopen ("/proc/self/maps", "r");
+   if (f) {
+   while (!feof (f)) {
+@@ -323,6 +324,7 @@
+   fclose (f);
+   }
+ #endif
++#endif
+   }
+   if (gvc->common.verbose > 1) 
+   fprintf (stderr, "libdir = \"%s\"\n",
diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/series 
graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/series
--- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/series   2012-07-10 15:37:19.0 
-0700
+++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/series   2013-03-03 16:59:59.0 
-0800
@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@
 fix-hurd-autotools
 automake_1.11.2_fixes
 explicit_ruby_1.8
+kfreebsd-hang.patch


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 10.0-0-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 17:15 -0800, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Please unblock package graphviz
> 
>   Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: #701832)

Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---

Re: Uploading new s3ql to testing-proposed-updates

2013-03-03 Thread Nikolaus Rath 
On 02/27/2013 11:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 10:18 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On 02/27/2013 05:25 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On 25.02.2013 02:41, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
 I'd like to upload a new version of S3QL to
testing-proposed-updates to
 fix bug #701350. Unstable already contains a newer upstream release
 (1.12), so I cannot upload there.
>>>
>>> The bug log for #701350 implies that a) it doesn't affect the
version of
>>> s3ql in wheezy and b) it has yet to be fixed in sid. Is either or both
>>> of those implications correct?
>>
>> Wheezy S3QL and sid S3QL both contain the bug. Currently, the wheezy
>> libc seems to incidentally work around the S3QL bug. However, this does
>> not happen with newer libc versions, so it may well be a libc bug
>> canceling out the S3QL bug. Therefore, with the current wheezy S3QL, any
>> change to wheezy's libc puts S3QL users at the risk of data loss.
>
> In that case, please fix the version information:
>
> Found in version s3ql/1.12-1
>
> It also shouldn't be tagged "sid".
>
>> I have not yet uploaded a patched version for sid, because I wasn't sure
>> if/how this interacts with getting an update into wheezy. If you'd like
>> to see the change in sid first, I'd be happy to upload. But note that
>> sid *already* contains a newer S3QL release than wheezy.
>
> Fixing sid first is always appreciated, even where a t-p-u will be
> required to fix wheezy (afaict the fix would be essentially the same in
> each case); thanks.

Ok, I updated severity and tags of the bug and uploaded a new version to
unstable that fixes the issue there.

I have put the proposed update for testing on mentors.debian.net
:

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3ql/s3ql_1.11.1-3.dsc

What else do I need to do?


Thanks for your help!

-Nikolaus

-- 
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C

Bug#702206: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13

2013-03-03 Thread Christoph Egger 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package graphviz

  Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: #701832)

unblock graphviz/2.26.3-13

diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog
--- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog2012-07-10 15:37:19.0 -0700
+++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/changelog2013-03-03 17:00:51.0 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+graphviz (2.26.3-13) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ David Claughton ]
+  * Add 'fontfaq.txt' file to graphviz-doc package 
+
+  [ Christoph Egger ]
+  * Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: 
#701832)
+
+ -- David Claughton   Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:10:00 +0100
+
 graphviz (2.26.3-12) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fixes to explicitly use ruby 1.8 as default for ruby is now 1.9
diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/graphviz-doc.install 
graphviz-2.26.3/debian/graphviz-doc.install
--- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/graphviz-doc.install 2012-07-10 15:36:38.0 
-0700
+++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/graphviz-doc.install 2013-03-03 16:58:05.0 
-0800
@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@
 usr/share/graphviz/doc/ChangeLog usr/share/doc/graphviz
 usr/share/graphviz/doc/Dot.ref   usr/share/doc/graphviz
 usr/share/graphviz/doc/latex_suggestions.txt usr/share/doc/graphviz
-
+usr/share/graphviz/doc/fontfaq.txt usr/share/doc/graphviz
diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/kfreebsd-hang.patch 
graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/kfreebsd-hang.patch
--- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/kfreebsd-hang.patch  1969-12-31 
16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/kfreebsd-hang.patch  2013-03-03 
16:59:53.0 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Index: graphviz-2.26.3/lib/gvc/gvconfig.c
+===
+--- graphviz-2.26.3.orig/lib/gvc/gvconfig.c2013-03-03 17:26:23.0 
+
 graphviz-2.26.3/lib/gvc/gvconfig.c 2013-03-03 17:29:41.235960554 +
+@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@
+ #else
+   /* this only works on linux, other systems will get GVLIBDIR only */
+   libdir = GVLIBDIR;
++#ifdef linux
+   f = fopen ("/proc/self/maps", "r");
+   if (f) {
+   while (!feof (f)) {
+@@ -323,6 +324,7 @@
+   fclose (f);
+   }
+ #endif
++#endif
+   }
+   if (gvc->common.verbose > 1) 
+   fprintf (stderr, "libdir = \"%s\"\n",
diff -Nru graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/series 
graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/series
--- graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/series   2012-07-10 15:37:19.0 
-0700
+++ graphviz-2.26.3/debian/patches/series   2013-03-03 16:59:59.0 
-0800
@@ -14,3 +14,4 @@
 fix-hurd-autotools
 automake_1.11.2_fixes
 explicit_ruby_1.8
+kfreebsd-hang.patch


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 10.0-0-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130304011545.52696.57594.report...@mitoraj.siccegge.de

Bug#702132: unblock: linux/3.2.39-2

2013-03-03 Thread Ben Hutchings 
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 12:04 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar  3, 2013 at 00:45:39 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> > Most of the changes are under:
> > debian/patches/features/all/alx/
> > debian/patches/features/all/drm/
> > debian/patches/features/all/fermi-accel/ [deleted]
> > debian/patches/features/all/iguanair/
> > debian/patches/features/all/line6/
> > debian/patches/features/all/virtio_scsi/
> > for which the diffstat is:
> >  153 files changed, 167984 insertions(+), 873 deletions(-)
> > This is all new hardware support (with some risk of regressions in
> > the drm drivers, but feedback so far is overwhelmingly positive).
> > 
> I've seen one possible regression report so far, #701743.

Yes, I'm aware of that and will follow it up.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Always try to do things in chronological order;
it's less confusing that way.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#698833: unblock: rss2email/1:2.71-2

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

Etienne Millon wrote (24 Jan 2013 21:13:36 GMT) :
> * Niels Thykier  [130124 22:11]:
>> Jakub Wilk recommended that I revoked the hint and I understand from
>> the log of #638994 that the patched version has its issues.

> Agreed, I may have rushed a bit on this one. Sorry for the noise.

Any update on this side?

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/857glom56k@boum.org

Processed: tagging 701795

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 701795 - moreinfo
Bug #701795 [release.debian.org] unblock: otrs2/3.1.7+dfsg1-7
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
701795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701795
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13623530969555.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#698117: unblock: rebuildd/0.4.2

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi Julien (Danjou),

Julien Cristau wrote (19 Jan 2013 11:28:00 GMT) :
> Why does the source package contain .pyc files?

> Also, the bug log suggests the fix is 2 removed lines, vs
>  48 files changed, 1717 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> for 0.4.2.  I'm not particularly excited by the idea of reviewing the
> latter.

Given these concerns and the fact time happened to go on flying since
Julien Cristau expressed these, at this point of the release process,
I think the only way to ship rebuildd in Wheezy would be to prepare
a t-p-u upload with only the minimal bugfix for the RC bug.

Julien (Danjou), are you interested in preparing and testing such
a package, that the release team could then review and probably
pre-approve?

(Also Cc'ing Raphaël, who might be interested in doing this work if
Julien has no time to do so.)

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85ehfwm5qu@boum.org

Bug#689698: please unblock gupnp stack

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

Andreas Henriksson wrote (03 Dec 2012 11:43:26 GMT) :
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 02:29:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> The thing is, these updated packages mean rather big diffs, and don't
>> seem to close any reported bugs, according to the changelogs.  So I'm
>> afraid this isn't a very high priority.

> If there is anything I can do from my end to make it easier for you,
> please tell me... Interopability is everything for this kind of software.

> If I don't hear anything I'll trust you know what's best for our users
> and simply leave the packages to their destiny.

At this point of the release process, I think the risk is not worth
it, and I agree with Julien this is not very high priority, so
I recommend the release team closes this unblock request.

Too bad the upstream release timing was not appropriate for our freeze
in the first place. Thanks to time-based freezes, perhaps this can be
synchronized better for Jessie? :)

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85obf0m65q@boum.org

Bug#689698: please unblock gupnp stack

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo

Hi,

Adam D. Barratt wrote (09 Nov 2012 20:12:17 GMT) :
> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 13:11 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>> (I would also like to question the moreinfo tag put on the bug.
>> Please tell me what info you think is needed.)

> It was added in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689698#10 , to which
> you replied. It seems a little odd to be questioning it _now_. :-)

In the hope it might help people understand each other better,
I believe that Andreas was questioning why the tag was still here
three weeks after he had provided all information that he had been
asked. I thing one valid answer is "because Andreas did not remove the
moreinfo tag himself when replying" :) Doing it now.

(Workflow detail: I can understand one might be shy to remove
a moreinfo tag, and leave the responsibility to the info requester to
decide whether all the info they wanted was actually provided and
remove the tag themselves, but well, adding and removing tags is
cheap, and re-adding the tag is always possible, so IMHO unblock
request submitters could/should be bold and do it themselves when they
think they have replied everything.)

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85wqtom6ah@boum.org

Processed: Re: Bug#689698: please unblock gupnp stack

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #689698 [release.debian.org] unblock: gupnp/0.10.3-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
689698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b689698.1362352054859.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: retitle 692358 to unblock php5-midgard2/10.05.7-1

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 692358 unblock php5-midgard2/10.05.7-1
Bug #692358 [release.debian.org] Review php5-midgard2 package
Changed Bug title to 'unblock php5-midgard2/10.05.7-1' from 'Review 
php5-midgard2 package'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
692358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692358
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136235139428227.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#688966: Review midgard2-core package

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #688966 [release.debian.org] unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
688966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b688966.136235133527611.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#688966: Review midgard2-core package

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo

Hi,

Piotr Pokora wrote (03 Oct 2012 11:02:22 GMT) :
> Attached.

Thank you, and sorry for the delay in getting back to you.

On http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692358#17
you wrote:

 "I am not sure due to #688966.
  If midgard2-core is accepted to stable, then php5-midgard2
  might break."

If midgard2-core "might break" another package that's currently in
testing, then IMHO this should be expressed in terms of binary package
dependencies, and perhaps it should be made explicit that the unblock
request for midgard2-core should be considered in lockstep with the
unblock request for php5-midgard2 if that's actually the case?

(After reading the two bug logs and related ones for a while, I'm
still not sure I clearly understand what's at stake and what should be
done next, so 1. I might be totally wrong and confused and 2.
adding some clarity to the mix probably would not hurt.)

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85ehfwnlfi@boum.org

Bug#692212: unblock (pre-approval): pike7.8/7.8.700-2

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

Niels Thykier wrote (03 Nov 2012 15:53:00 GMT) :
> I think we'd need to see a debdiff to determine if this is acceptable.
> Feel free to filter (e.g. w. filterdiff) autogenerated parts and
> translations (if those appear in the diff).  Also if the diff is large,
> please check it actually reaches debian-release@l.d.o.

Four months have passed without a reply from the requester,
so I recommend the release team closes this unblock request.

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85r4jwnmk6@boum.org

Bug#701923: marked as done (unblock: btrfs-tools/0.19+20120328-7.1)

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:27:18 +
with message-id <1362349638.11072.57.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#701923: unblock: btrfs-tools/0.19+20120328-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #701923,
regarding unblock: btrfs-tools/0.19+20120328-7.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
701923: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701923
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

please ack the following patch for a rc bug fix through tpu.

Thanks,
Julien

diff -Nru btrfs-tools-0.19+20120328/debian/changelog 
btrfs-tools-0.19+20120328/debian/changelog
--- btrfs-tools-0.19+20120328/debian/changelog  2012-06-29 17:57:00.0 
+0200
+++ btrfs-tools-0.19+20120328/debian/changelog  2013-02-28 19:54:50.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+btrfs-tools (0.19+20120328-7.1) wheezy; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Move udev rules file from 60-btrfs.rules to 70-btrfs.rules so it runs
+after blkid (closes: #701642).  Thanks, Bastian Blank!
+
+ -- Julien Cristau   Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:54:48 +0100
+
 btrfs-tools (0.19+20120328-7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Using official package-type for udeb packages in control now.
diff -Nru btrfs-tools-0.19+20120328/debian/rules 
btrfs-tools-0.19+20120328/debian/rules
--- btrfs-tools-0.19+20120328/debian/rules  2012-06-29 03:40:53.0 
+0200
+++ btrfs-tools-0.19+20120328/debian/rules  2013-02-28 19:52:46.0 
+0100
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
done
 
# Adding udev integration
-   install -D -m 0644 debian/local/btrfs.udev 
debian/btrfs-tools/lib/udev/rules.d/60-btrfs.rules
+   install -D -m 0644 debian/local/btrfs.udev 
debian/btrfs-tools/lib/udev/rules.d/70-btrfs.rules
 
# Adding initramfs-tools integration
install -D -m 0755 debian/local/btrfs.hook 
debian/btrfs-tools/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/btrfs


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 23:23 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt  (28/02/2013):
> > Silly me failed to spot the udeb. Unblocked, but needs the d-i dance.
> 
> Dancing,

:-D

Hint added.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---

Bug#696671: marked as done (tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3)

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:26:44 +
with message-id <1362349604.11072.56.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#696671: tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3
has caused the Debian Bug report #696671,
regarding tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
696671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696671
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
Severity: normal

I plan to upload a tpu for isc-dhcp fixing two important issues.  One
fixes an unclean error situation, and the other sets up the default
dhclient configuration to work in ipv6-only configurations.  The first
change is less important, so I can drop it if needed.  Please review
the proposed patch attached.

Thanks,
Mike


isc-dhcp.patch
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 23:22 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt  (28/02/2013):
> > Unblocked, but needs a d-i ack.
> 
> AFAICT netcfg is the only consumer on the d-i side, on non-Linux ports
> only. isc-dhcp-client-udeb doesn't come with dhcp hooks anyway, and a
> better upgrade handling shouldn't hurt anything in d-i; I don't think
> there's any objection to unblocking it.

Thanks; unblock-udebbed.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---

Bug#696716: unblock: pyvorbis/1.5-2

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi Sandro,

Julien Cristau wrote (30 Dec 2012 20:02:57 GMT) :
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:47:28 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:

>> + Also changed the memory allocation of py_ov_read to something simpler

> Why?

>> +-  Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS
>> + retval = ov_read(ov_self->ovf, buff, length, 
>> +  bigendianp, word, sgned, &bitstream);
>> +-  Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS
>> + 

> And why?

Ping?

The time is getting tighter and tighter to fix #696640 in Wheezy.
In my understanding, the next thing to do is you answering Julien's
concerns about the proposed patch.

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85zjyknmp9@boum.org

Bug#701923: unblock: btrfs-tools/0.19+20120328-7.1

2013-03-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Adam D. Barratt  (28/02/2013):
> Silly me failed to spot the udeb. Unblocked, but needs the d-i dance.

Dancing,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#696671: tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3

2013-03-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Adam D. Barratt  (28/02/2013):
> Unblocked, but needs a d-i ack.

AFAICT netcfg is the only consumer on the d-i side, on non-Linux ports
only. isc-dhcp-client-udeb doesn't come with dhcp hooks anyway, and a
better upgrade handling shouldn't hurt anything in d-i; I don't think
there's any objection to unblocking it.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#693457: unblock: ibus-table/1.4.99.20121012-1

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

(Cc'ing all recent uploaders, in the hope that it helps finding an
acceptable solution.)

intrigeri wrote (26 Jan 2013 23:20:14 GMT) :
> This version is not in unstable, so it cannot be unblocked.

> If what you are asking for is a pre-upload approval instead of an
> unblock, then I suggest attaching a debdiff and explaining in more
> details what the changes are, what specific bugs they fix, and why it
> satisfies the current freeze policy.

Any news on this front, apart of 1.5.0.is.1.4.99.1-1 now being in
unstable? What's the version that should now be considered for an
unblock / t-p-u pre-approval by the release team? 

Given no bug was closed by any upload since 1.3.9.20110827-2, the
overall situation is totally unclear to me.

Can anyone confirm that the "Cangjie Chinese input method is not
usable without this"? If this is correct, then we probably really want
to see this fixed in Wheezy somehow I suppose, probably by fixing the
most important bugs through t-p-u. Anyone around here wanting to take
care of this?

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/857glop1g9@boum.org

Bug#693468: unblock: ibus-table-chinese/1.4.0.20121008-1

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

any news on this front?

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85ehfwp1tx@boum.org

Bug#690611: marked as done (unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5)

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:06:50 +
with message-id <1362348410.11072.55.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690611: unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690611,
regarding unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690611: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690611
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

Please unblock package gtkhotkey.
In 0.2.1-4 and 0.2.1-5, I supported multiarch.

---
gtkhotkey (0.2.1-5) unstable; urgency=low

   * Update debian/control.
 - Add 'Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}' to libgtkhotkey-dev.
 - Add 'Multi-Arch: same' to libgtkhotkey-dev.
 -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu   Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:11:14 +0900

gtkhotkey (0.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low

   * Update debian/control.
 - Add Version for cdbs.
 - Add 'Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}' to libgtkhotkey1.
 - Add 'Multi-Arch: same' to libgtkhotkey1.
   * Update debian/rules.
 Add DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS for multi-arch support.
   * Update debian/libgtkhotkey1.install.
 Convert to multi-arch support.
   * Update debian/libgtkhotkey-dev.install.
 Convert to multi-arch support.
 -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu   Mon, 06 Aug 2012 06:47:06 +0900--

-

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

unblock gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6


gtkhotkey_0.2.1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 23:00 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 00:51:44 GMT) :
> > Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Nov 2012 17:13:53 GMT) :
> >> Why is multi-arch support for this particular library important, at this
> >> stage of the freeze? Neither of its reverse-dependencies are currently
> >> m-a tagged, nor sound like applications one would particularly need to
> >> install for multiple architectures simultaneously.
> 
> > Ping?
> 
> No feedback from the requester for 4.5 months and the package does not
> look particularly buggy in testing currently, so I recommend the
> release team rejects this unblock request.

Yep, sounds fair to me; thanks for the follow-up. Maintainer, please
re-open if you wish, but with an answer to the early question.

Regards,

Adam--- End Message ---

Bug#690134: marked as done (unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5)

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:06:32 +0100
with message-id <85obf0p28n@boum.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690134: unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690134,
regarding unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690134
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package polyorb

There is a bug against libpolyorb3 (#688299) in version 2.8~20110207-4.
Version 2.8~20110207-5 remove the diversion and the manpage that was diverted
and this solve the bug.

The polyorb.7 manpage doesn't document any binary and isn't very usefull so
the changes are quite small. Also the polyorb-doc (no changes in it) contains
much more information than the polyorb.7 manpage so users still have access to
the informations from the removed manpage.

unblock polyorb/2.8~20110207-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]

Files in first .changes but not in second
-
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/man/man7/polyorb.7.gz
-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   DEBIAN/preinst

Control files of package libpolyorb-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Depends: libpolyorb3 (= [-2.8~20110207-4),-] {+2.8~20110207-5),+} 
libpolyorb2-dev (= [-2.8~20110207-4)-] {+2.8~20110207-5)+}
Version: [-2.8~20110207-4-] {+2.8~20110207-5+}

Control files of package libpolyorb2-dev: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libgnat-4.6 (>= [-4.6.3-4),-] 
{+4.6.3-6),+} libpolyorb3 (= [-2.8~20110207-4),-] {+2.8~20110207-5),+} g++, 
gnat-4.6
Recommends: polyorb-servers (= [-2.8~20110207-4)-] {+2.8~20110207-5)+}
Version: [-2.8~20110207-4-] {+2.8~20110207-5+}

Control files of package libpolyorb3: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libgnat-4.6 (>= [-4.6.3-4)-] 
{+4.6.3-6)+}
Installed-Size: [-21286-] {+21285+}
Recommends: polyorb-servers (= [-2.8~20110207-4)-] {+2.8~20110207-5)+}
Version: [-2.8~20110207-4-] {+2.8~20110207-5+}

Control files of package polyorb-doc: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Recommends: libpolyorb2-dev (= [-2.8~20110207-4)-] {+2.8~20110207-5)+}
Version: [-2.8~20110207-4-] {+2.8~20110207-5+}

Control files of package polyorb-servers: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libgnat-4.6 (>= [-4.6.3-4),-] 
{+4.6.3-6),+} libpolyorb3
Version: [-2.8~20110207-4-] {+2.8~20110207-5+}
diffstat for polyorb-2.8~20110207 polyorb-2.8~20110207

 changelog|9 +
 libpolyorb3.manpages |1 -
 libpolyorb3.postrm   |   10 --
 libpolyorb3.preinst  |   10 --
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff -Nru polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/changelog polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/changelog
--- polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/changelog	2012-06-13 23:48:28.0 +0200
+++ polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/changelog	2012-09-29 09:55:26.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+polyorb (2.8~20110207-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * remove diversion of manpage polyorb.7
+the man page isn't put in any package since it contains general information
+not very usefull
+Closes: #688299
+
+ -- Xavier Grave   Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:48:41 +0200
+
 polyorb (2.8~20110207-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * remove the testsuite run as part of the build
diff -Nru polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/libpolyorb3.manpages polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/libpolyorb3.manpages
--- polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/libpolyorb3.manpages	2012-05-29 15:44:31.0 +0200
+++ polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/libpolyorb3.manpages	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-docs/polyorb.7
diff -Nru polyorb-2.8~20110207/debian/libpolyorb3

Bug#702195: symlink conffiles are not supported, causing problems for dpkg on upgrade/removal and incorrect debsums reports

2013-03-03 Thread Michael Biebl 
On 03.03.2013 22:53, Michael Biebl wrote:
> syslog-ng-core:
>  /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/syslog-ng.service
>  /etc/systemd/system/syslog-ng.service
> 

Oh, and btw, converting the /etc/systemd/system/syslog.service symlink
to a real file named /etc/systemd/system/syslog-ng.service is broken
too. The name *needs* to be syslog.service as this name is referenced in
other places.


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#690611: unblock: gtkhotkey/0.2.1-5

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

intrigeri wrote (12 Dec 2012 00:51:44 GMT) :
> Adam D. Barratt wrote (12 Nov 2012 17:13:53 GMT) :
>> Why is multi-arch support for this particular library important, at this
>> stage of the freeze? Neither of its reverse-dependencies are currently
>> m-a tagged, nor sound like applications one would particularly need to
>> install for multiple architectures simultaneously.

> Ping?

No feedback from the requester for 4.5 months and the package does not
look particularly buggy in testing currently, so I recommend the
release team rejects this unblock request.

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85vc98p2hw@boum.org

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2013-03-03 Thread Christoph Egger 
Hi!

intrigeri  writes:
> Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
>>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
>>> > whole new release?
>
>> Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs
>> in 4.01?
>
> As I understand it (and not being a member of the release team), it
> differs because that one has been reported in Debian as the #685356
> important bug, while the others have not. At this time of the freeze,
> including a new upstream release because it fixes a lot of more or
> less important bugs (and adds a few features..) is probably not an
> option. I guess that's exactly why Salvatore prepared a minimal
> t-p-u debdiff.
>
> But well, if you feel like every change in 4.01 satisfies the current
> freeze policy and should be fixed in Wheezy, then please feel free to
> explain why :)
>
>> Anyway, we can surely do a Wheezy version of 4.00 that fixes XFS.
>
> OK. Do you ACK Salvatore's proposed t-p-u debdiff?

Hm could we maybe add 8b6ce13e1b196cb9d0cc5b24dfc75c97a9eb883d (upstream
git) as well?
Seems to be the one addressing (at least the second half of)
#698864. Cc-ed the folks there to check the fixed quota 4.00 binary they
deployed is actually using this patch.

Christoph

8b6ce13e1b196cb9d0cc5b24dfc75c97a9eb883d
>>>
>From 8b6ce13e1b196cb9d0cc5b24dfc75c97a9eb883d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara 
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 19:16:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] quota: Fix reporting of NFS mountpoints

Commit b8ab76ad19e3c284ac14bd0450662bfc41719e03 creating split_nfs_mount()
forgot to remove zeroing of pathname character. That lead to broken reporting
quotas for NFSv3 mount points.

Thanks to anonymous reporter for spotting this.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara 
---
 rquota_client.c |1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/rquota_client.c b/rquota_client.c
index 54a8921..e26e066 100644
--- a/rquota_client.c
+++ b/rquota_client.c
@@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ int rpc_rquota_get(struct dquot *dquot)
return -ENOENT;
}
 
-   *pathname++ = '\0';
/* For NFSv4, we send the filesystem path without initial /. Server 
prepends proper
 * NFS pseudoroot automatically and uses this for detection of NFSv4 
mounts. */
if ((dquot->dq_h->qh_io_flags & IOFL_NFS_MIXED_PATHS) &&
-- 
1.7.4.1
<<<


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874ngsb0xj@mitoraj.siccegge.de

Bug#690248: unblock: yforth/0.2.1-1

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi Bdale,

Bdale Garbee wrote (28 Dec 2012 21:42:25 GMT) :
> I don't care if this version promotes to wheezy or not.

Well noted.

> I thought at one point it was a goal to get more hardening done for
> wheezy packages,

Sure it was, and I, for one, do hope that dh compat level >= 9 brings
even more for Jessie!

> and this seems like an innocuous set of changes to me.

FTR, and just to clarify, I've seen at least one member of the release
team express something similar to: the kind of effects hardening build
flags have can't easily be reviewed in a debdiff, that's why they are
generally rejected at this stage of the freeze (unless the package is
part of one of the more specific hardening sub-goals set by the
security team).

> Had the unblock request been processed when it was first made it
> probably would have been fine, but I see no reason to push on it at
> this point.

Understood.
So, I recommend the release team closes this unblock request.

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8538wcqhap@boum.org

Re: fixing bug 700891 acceptable?

2013-03-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 19:41 +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote:
> could you please let me know whether an upload to t-p-u with the patch
> in bug 700891 is acceptable in this stage of the freeze?

>From a quick look it appears it could be suitable if the upload occurred
soon (although a debdiff of the proposed package would still be
preferred beforehand).

According to the version tracking information on the bug, it's still
unfixed in unstable. If that's correct, please fix the bug in unstable
first; if not, please correct the version information.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1362347855.11072.53.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#702195: symlink conffiles are not supported, causing problems for dpkg on upgrade/removal and incorrect debsums reports

2013-03-03 Thread Michael Biebl 
found 690067 3.3.5-3
thanks

I quickly talked to algernon on IRC and did let him know that the
proposed fix to use real conffiles for the systemd symlinks is not good.
symlinks in .wants directories should never be real files.
That will only cause problems in the future.

Specifically the syslog.service symlink, which points to the default
syslog provider, can't be a real file as this will break upgrades from
syslog-ng to rsyslog or vice versa.

I think we should get away with not installing any symlinks in
syslog-ng, and let my auto-enabler [1] do the symlink bits.
Since /etc/systemd/system/syslog.service is a shared ressource between
rsyslog and syslog-ng, this one probably needs some special handling.

Seeing the poor handling of symlinked conffiles, I'm wondering if we
should also remove them for the other affected packages, which do that:

acpid:
 /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/acpid.socket
avahi-daemon:
 /etc/systemd/system/dbus-org.freedesktop.Avahi.service
 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/avahi-daemon.service
 /etc/systemd/system/sockets.target.wants/avahi-daemon.socket
avahi-dnsconfd:
 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/avahi-dnsconfd.service
hal:
 /etc/systemd/system/dbus-org.freedesktop.Hal.service
live-config-systemd:
 /etc/systemd/system/basic.target.wants/live-config.service
rsyslog:
 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/rsyslog.service
 /etc/systemd/system/syslog.service
syslog-ng-core:
 /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/syslog-ng.service
 /etc/systemd/system/syslog-ng.service

I think my auto-enabler should work well enough, until we have proper
tools support in jessie.

Michael, Tollef: any thoughts?


[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-systemd/systemd.git;a=commit;h=d7e5781795296c24f0f311a7227bfb5e86dc51fa
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: udeb unblock for libgcrypt11

2013-03-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:04 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I've finally been able to perform some run-time tests with the -5
> udeb, which seems to work fine as far as assisted ciphered LVM is
> confirmed. d-i ACK accordingly.

Thanks; unblock-udeb added.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1362347409.11072.50.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#689822: Fwd: Bug#689822: release.debian.org: please accept the package wims_4.03a-8 into testing-proposed-updates

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi Georges,

intrigeri wrote (28 Jan 2013 04:08:31 GMT) :
> Hence, I suggest you propose a tentative debdiff of 4.03a-7+deb7u1 for
> t-p-u that would fix the RC bugs only (#687947 at least), or closing
> this bug and maintaining wims through wheezy-backports until Jessie is
> out. I hope the former would be considered by the release team, on the
> ground that erroneously wims was removed from testing due to a buggy
> script on their side, but quite some time has passed since then so I'm
> not sure what I would decide if I were in their position.

Ping? More than a month has passed, and I'm more and more tempted to
recommend the release team to simply close this bug.

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85ip58qhrt@boum.org

Processed: retitle 689822 to unblock wims/4.04~dfsg2-1

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 689822 unblock wims/4.04~dfsg2-1
Bug #689822 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: please accept the package 
wims_4.03a-8 into testing-proposed-updates
Changed Bug title to 'unblock wims/4.04~dfsg2-1' from 'release.debian.org: 
please accept the package wims_4.03a-8 into testing-proposed-updates'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
689822: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689822
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136234701425021.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) :
>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the
>> > whole new release?

> Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs
> in 4.01?

As I understand it (and not being a member of the release team), it
differs because that one has been reported in Debian as the #685356
important bug, while the others have not. At this time of the freeze,
including a new upstream release because it fixes a lot of more or
less important bugs (and adds a few features..) is probably not an
option. I guess that's exactly why Salvatore prepared a minimal
t-p-u debdiff.

But well, if you feel like every change in 4.01 satisfies the current
freeze policy and should be fixed in Wheezy, then please feel free to
explain why :)

> Anyway, we can surely do a Wheezy version of 4.00 that fixes XFS.

OK. Do you ACK Salvatore's proposed t-p-u debdiff?

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85ppzgqi2m@boum.org

Bug#685663: unblock nordugrid-arc/2.0.0-3

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

Jonathan Nieder wrote (03 Jan 2013 07:31:25 GMT) :
> If I understand correctly then nordugrid-arc was not part of squeeze,
> so stable users are not relying on it yet.  In that case I would
> suggest considering providing the package for wheezy through
> wheezy-backports after the release, which should make later fixes
> easier.  What do you think?

Same as #683142 (and dependent on it, since nordugrid-arc-aris
Depends: bdii): no reply from Mattias for months, and nordugrid-arc
was removed from testing last July, so I recommend the release team
rejects this unblock request, and the maintainer uses backports after
the release as they see fit to provide packages for stable users.

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85obf0rx9t@boum.org

Bug#683142: unblock: bdii/5.2.5-2+wheezy3

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

Jonathan Nieder wrote (03 Jan 2013 07:25:58 GMT) :
> Any news?  Is the version of bdii currently in tpu the right one for
> wheezy, or are there more updates coming?

Given there's been no feedback from Mattias on this bug since October,
and bdii hasn't been in testing since July, I recommend the release
team rejects this unblock request.

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85vc98rxgn@boum.org

Processed: retitle 702195 to pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3, user release.debian....@packages.debian.org ...

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 702195 pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
Bug #702195 [release.debian.org] unblock: syslog-ng/3.3.5-3
Changed Bug title to 'pre-approval of syslog-ng/3.3.5-3' from 'unblock: 
syslog-ng/3.3.5-3'
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
intrig...@debian.org).
> usertags 702195 + unblock
Usertags were: freeze-exception.
Usertags are now: unblock freeze-exception.
> usertags 702195 - freeze-exception
Usertags were: unblock freeze-exception.
Usertags are now: unblock.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
702195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702195
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13623448717302.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: udeb unblock for libgcrypt11

2013-03-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Andreas Metzler  (24/02/2013):
> On 2013-02-24 "Adam D. Barratt"  wrote:
> > libgcrypt11 1.5.0-4 contains a few small patches fixing RC bugs
> > affecting other packages. I'm happy unblocking it, but can we add
> > it to the unblock-udeb request list please? (Would a single mail
> > with several requests in be more helpful?)
> 
> FYI I have uploaded 1.5.0-5 about 30 minutes after 1.5.0-4, it adds
> another important fix. Looks like the upload happened at same time
> as the mirror push, delaying ACCEPT, otherwise there should not have
> been any duplicate work. Sorry.

I've finally been able to perform some run-time tests with the -5
udeb, which seems to work fine as far as assisted ciphered LVM is
confirmed. d-i ACK accordingly.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: New version of musescore package

2013-03-03 Thread intrigeri 
Hi,

Toby Smithe wrote (03 Mar 2013 16:42:59 GMT) :
> It would be really good to have this version 1.3 in wheezy, because
> of the "major nuisance" being fixed, but also because of the fact
> that I've fixed this new package to be buildable and installable on
> kFreeBSD and Hurd.

A debdiff would help a lot to review the changes.

Cheers,
-- 
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8538wctcw0@boum.org

Bug#702195: unblock: syslog-ng/3.3.5-3

2013-03-03 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
thanks

Hi Release Team,

There are several important, RC bugfix over syslog-ng/3.3.5-2 in Wheezy.

First is virtual console differences between Linux and kFreeBSD[1]. It's
tty10 on the former and ttyva on the latter. Without fixing #697042 ,
syslog-ng would flood kFreeBSD logs with:
Error opening file for writing; filename='/dev/tty10', error='Operation not 
supported (45)'

The default syslog-ng configuration used wrong path for mail related
logs, as noted in #692056 [2].

Don't use symlinked systemd configuration files, as noted in
#690067 [3]. This caused all short of problems as dpkg doesn't support
it.

Last but not least the one which affects the DSA team is #702131 [4].
The fix is to handle EINVAL as well for eventfd2 errors.

The fixes are small and usually one liners. Debdiff is attached.

Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697042
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692056
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690067
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702131
diff -Nru syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/changelog syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/changelog
--- syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/changelog	2012-05-13 00:47:21.0 +0200
+++ syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/changelog	2013-03-03 19:22:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
+syslog-ng (3.3.5-3) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  [ Gergely Nagy  ]
+  * Don't mark systemd symlinks in /etc as conffiles.
+  * Instead of installing systemd service file symlinks, install a
+conffile, that includes the real service file (closes: #690067).
+  * Do not forcibly remove the systemd service files, that code is not
+needed anymore.
+  * Use the standard /var/log/mail.{info,err,warn} location for the various
+mail-related logs (closes: #692056).
+  * Use /dev/ttyva on kFreeBSD as the target of the d_console_all
+destination (closes: #697042).
+
+  [ Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) ]
+  * Fix ivykis fallback on eventfd2 errors with the addition of
+ivykis_fallback_fix.patch (closes: #702131).
+
+ -- Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)   Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:57:00 +0100
+
 syslog-ng (3.3.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Gergely Nagy  ]
diff -Nru syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/ivykis_fallback_fix.patch syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/ivykis_fallback_fix.patch
--- syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/ivykis_fallback_fix.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/ivykis_fallback_fix.patch	2013-03-03 17:53:25.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+Description: make ivykis properly fallback on eventfd2 errors
+ The Linux glibc eventfd() wrapper function (around the SYS_eventfd{,2}
+ system calls) returns EINVAL if it is given a nonzero flags argument
+ and SYS_eventfd2 (which is the variant of SYS_eventfd that takes a flags
+ argument) isn't implemented, while iv_event_raw was expecting to get
+ either ENOSYS or success.
+ .
+ Instead of falling back on SYS_eventfd by calling the eventfd() wrapper
+ again with a zero flags argument and then setting the O_NONBLOCK and
+ O_CLOEXEC flags by hand, disable use of eventfd on systems that have
+ SYS_eventfd but not SYS_eventfd2 as a minimally invasive fix for the
+ stable branches.
+ Taken from: https://github.com/buytenh/ivykis/commit/89f67f97477aeba24aebfc58ae1a17e5bea69724.patch
+Author: Lennert Buytenhek 
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/702131
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Last-Update: 2012-12-09
+
+---
+
+--- syslog-ng-3.3.5.orig/lib/ivykis/modules/iv_event_raw.c
 syslog-ng-3.3.5/lib/ivykis/modules/iv_event_raw.c
+@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int iv_event_raw_register(struct iv_even
+ 
+ 		ret = eventfd2(0, EFD_NONBLOCK | EFD_CLOEXEC);
+ 		if (ret < 0) {
+-			if (errno != ENOSYS) {
++			if (errno != ENOSYS && errno != EINVAL) {
+ perror("eventfd2");
+ return -1;
+ 			}
diff -Nru syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/series syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/series
--- syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/series	2012-05-03 10:25:19.0 +0200
+++ syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/patches/series	2013-03-03 17:48:08.0 +0100
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 no_make_in_debian.patch
+ivykis_fallback_fix.patch
diff -Nru syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/rules syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/rules
--- syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/rules	2012-05-13 00:49:52.0 +0200
+++ syslog-ng-3.3.5/debian/rules	2013-03-03 18:52:18.0 +0100
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 # to it.
 ##
 ifneq (,$(filter debug,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
-	EXTRA_CONFIGURE_OPTS += --enable-debug
+EXTRA_CONFIGURE_OPTS += --enable-debug
 endif
 
 DEFAULT_MODULES = affile,afprog,afsocket,afuser,afsql,basicfuncs,csvparser,dbparser,syslogformat
@@ -129,10 +129,6 @@
 override_dh_auto_install:
 	dh_auto_install
 	${MAKE} -C debian/build-tree/lib/ivykis install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
-	ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/syslog-ng.service \
-	   debian/syslog-ng-core/etc/systemd/system/syslog.service
-	ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/sy

NEW changes in stable-new

2013-03-03 Thread Debian FTP Masters 
Processing changes file: xen_4.0.1-5.8_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xen_4.0.1-5.8_i386.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ucedh-0003zn...@franck.debian.org

Processed: your mail

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 702193 -moreinfo
Bug #702193 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Bug #690461 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Bug #694975 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for 
freecad and netgen
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 690461 -moreinfo
Bug #690461 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Bug #694975 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for 
freecad and netgen
Bug #702193 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #690461 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #694975 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #702193 to the same tags previously set
> tags 694975 -moreinfo
Bug #694975 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for 
freecad and netgen
Bug #690461 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Bug #702193 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #694975 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #690461 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #702193 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690461
694975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694975
702193: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702193
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136233873719656.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: your mail

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forcemerge 702193 690461 694975
Bug #702193 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Bug #690461 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #702193 [release.debian.org] RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #694975 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Wheezy-ignore tag for 
freecad and netgen
Merged 690461 694975 702193
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690461
694975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694975
702193: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702193
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136233824115376.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#702193: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7

2013-03-03 Thread Anton Gladky 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Due to unresolved license question (#617613), please, remove the package
from testing.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.7-trunk-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130303190423.10886.63658.report...@debian.home.debian

fixing bug 700891 acceptable?

2013-03-03 Thread Joachim Reichel 
Hi release team,

could you please let me know whether an upload to t-p-u with the patch
in bug 700891 is acceptable in this stage of the freeze?

It's not a FTBFS bug since that header file is not used during building
of the (compiled) library (most of CGAL is generic template code). But
other software using that module will fail to build due to this syntax
error (older g++ versions accepted the incorrect code).

Thanks,
  Joachim

P.S.: Please CC: me on replies.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51339965.2080...@gmx.de

Bug#702186: RM: owncloud/4.0.4debian2-3.3

2013-03-03 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Sun, Mar  3, 2013 at 11:50:50 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
> 
> As was brought up recently, owncloud is anticipated to be a nightmare
> security-wise during wheezy's lifetime:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/03/msg00042.html
> 
> It has yet to land in a stable release and has no reverse-dependencies.
> 
And having two separate threads for the same discussion is oh so
helpful...

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#702001: marked as done (unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5)

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:50:49 +
with message-id <1362333049.11072.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702001: unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #702001,
regarding unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
702001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package opendnssec

Hi,

I have split the doxygen generated documentation to separate package
named opendnssec-doc, which is arch-indep, so it doesn't get built on
buildds.  This is a workaround for failing doxygen on kfreebsd-i386
(#701832), e.g. you can set it wheezy-ignore.  This has also the
advantage that the size of binary packages has dropped by one
magnitude, since the doxygen documentation is 52M unpacked.  I should
have noticed this earlier :(.

This debian release also fixes a small problem when configure didn't
know about pkill from procps and thus some reload commands didn't work
properly (#701703).  While not critical, this is an annoying bug with
very small fix.

Debdiff attached.

$ diffstat opendnssec_1.3.9-5.debdiff
 changelog   |   12 
 control |   24 
 libhsm-bin.install  |1 -
 opendnssec-auditor.install  |1 -
 opendnssec-doc.dirs |4 
 opendnssec-doc.install  |4 
 opendnssec-enforcer.install |1 -
 opendnssec-signer.install   |1 -
 rules   |   12 +++-
 9 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

unblock opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/changelog opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/changelog
--- opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/changelog	2013-01-15 10:30:29.0 +0100
+++ opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/changelog	2013-03-01 15:37:48.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+opendnssec (1:1.3.9-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Add procps to build dependencies, so ods-ksmutil can HUP enforcer
+(Closes: #701703)
+  * Create arch:all new opendnssec-doc package and move the doxygen
+documentation there
+  * Split dh_auto_build to arch and indep, so doxygen documentation is
+built only once
+  * Run dh_installdoc on opendnssec-doc too, so it gets it's own copyright
+
+ -- Ondřej Surý   Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:52:33 +0100
+
 opendnssec (1:1.3.9-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Move the information about dropping the foreign key to README.Debian
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/control opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/control
--- opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/control	2013-01-15 10:30:29.0 +0100
+++ opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/control	2013-03-01 15:37:48.0 +0100
@@ -24,9 +24,10 @@
 	   libldns-dev (>= 1.6.12~),
 	   libcunit1-dev,
 	   opensc,
-	   rdoc,
-	   graphviz,
-	   doxygen
+	   procps
+Build-Depends-Indep: rdoc,
+	   	 graphviz,
+	   	 doxygen
 Standards-Version: 3.9.2
 Homepage: http://www.opendnssec.org/
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-nlnetlabs/opendnssec.git
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@
 Depends: ${misc:Depends},
 	 opendnssec-enforcer-sqlite3 | opendnssec-enforcer,
 	 opendnssec-signer,
+	 opendnssec-doc,
 	 libhsm-bin
 Recommends: opendnssec-auditor
 Suggests: softhsm
@@ -86,11 +88,25 @@
  .
  This meta-package depends on the standard distribution of OpenDNSSEC.
 
+Package: opendnssec-doc
+Section: misc
+Architecture: all
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}
+Suggests: opendnssec, softhsm
+Description: documentation for OpenDNSSEC suite
+ OpenDNSSEC is a complete DNSSEC zone signing system which is very
+ easy to use with stability and security in mind.  There are a lot of
+ details in signing zone files with DNSSEC and OpenDNSSEC covers most
+ of it.
+ .
+ This package contains doxygen documentation for OpenDNSSEC.
+
 Package: opendnssec-enforcer
 Section: admin
 Architecture: all
 Depends: ${misc:Depends},
-	 opendnssec-enforcer-backend
+	 opendnssec-enforcer-backend,
+	 procps
 Recommends: opendnssec-signer, opendnssec-auditor
 Suggests: opendnssec, softhsm
 Description: tool to prepare DNSSEC keys (common package)
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/libhsm-bin.inst

Bug#702001: unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5

2013-03-03 Thread Ansgar Burchardt 
Control: tag -1 moreinfo

opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5 is now in unstable.

Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obf0idb3@eisei.43-1.org

Processed: Re: unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing control commands:

> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #702001 [release.debian.org] unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #702001 to the same tags previously set

-- 
702001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b702001.1362332965398.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

New version of musescore package

2013-03-03 Thread Toby Smithe 
Dear debian-release,

(I am CC'ing my sponsor, Tobias, and I am not subscribed to the list,
so please CC me in responses.)

I maintain the `musescore' package, and upstream have just made a new
release to fix some bugs; at their release notes[0], they write,

"Two bugs causing a major nuisance and a dozen of smaller ones have
been fixed. No new features have been added. The translations and the
handbooks have been updated." [though we can ignore the handbooks,
because I don't package those in Debian, instead providing links to
the online version]

It would be really good to have this version 1.3 in wheezy, because of
the "major nuisance" being fixed, but also because of the fact that
I've fixed this new package to be buildable and installable on
kFreeBSD and Hurd.

These aren't release-critical fixes, but they do have a significant
impact on the usability of the program for regular users, who are the
users I value most.

[0] 
http://musescore.org/en/developers-handbook/release-notes/release-notes-musescore-1.3

Best wishes,

Toby


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAHhkY_hu=M1NCDUhsXY=vrd87y5yra96q6ysre6w1s7vyla...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#702151: RM: haskell-tls-extra/0.4.6.1-1

2013-03-03 Thread Joachim Breitner 
Hi Haskell Group,

looks like for a change we have some real development work, or have to
drop haskell-tls-extra from wheezy (which would also remove large chunks
of yesod):

Am Sonntag, den 03.03.2013, 10:53 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> On 2013-03-03 10:07, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Please consider removing haskell-tls-extra.  The security backport
> > caused a regression that pretty much completely breaks the package
> > (#701593), and the upstream bug log seems to indicate a lack of
> > interest in supporting older versions:
> > https://github.com/vincenthz/hs-tls/issues/32
> > 
> 
> CC'ing the maintainers+uploader of the affected, plus the reporter for
> comments on this.  Do any of you feel you would be able to write a patch
> for it that could be included in Wheezy or ...?

I don’t think I’ll find the time to investigate this. But hopefully
someone else on the team is able and willing to work on this?

Greetings,
Joachim
-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#702001: unblock: opendnssec/1:1.3.9-5

2013-03-03 Thread Ondřej Surý 
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #702001
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Yet another version :(

$ diffstat opendnssec_1.3.9-5.debdiff
 changelog   |   12 
 control |   26 ++
 libhsm-bin.install  |1 -
 opendnssec-auditor.install  |1 -
 opendnssec-doc.dirs |4 
 opendnssec-doc.install  |4 
 opendnssec-enforcer.install |1 -
 opendnssec-signer.install   |1 -
 rules   |   12 +++-
 9 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/changelog opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/changelog
--- opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/changelog	2013-01-15 10:30:29.0 +0100
+++ opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/changelog	2013-03-03 16:00:34.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+opendnssec (1:1.3.9-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Add procps to build dependencies, so ods-ksmutil can HUP enforcer
+(Closes: #701703)
+  * Create arch:all new opendnssec-doc package and move the doxygen
+documentation there
+  * Split dh_auto_build to arch and indep, so doxygen documentation is
+built only once
+  * Run dh_installdoc on opendnssec-doc too, so it gets it's own copyright
+
+ -- Ondřej Surý   Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:52:33 +0100
+
 opendnssec (1:1.3.9-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Move the information about dropping the foreign key to README.Debian
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/control opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/control
--- opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/control	2013-01-15 10:30:29.0 +0100
+++ opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/control	2013-03-03 16:00:34.0 +0100
@@ -24,9 +24,10 @@
 	   libldns-dev (>= 1.6.12~),
 	   libcunit1-dev,
 	   opensc,
-	   rdoc,
-	   graphviz,
-	   doxygen
+	   procps
+Build-Depends-Indep: rdoc,
+	   	 graphviz,
+	   	 doxygen
 Standards-Version: 3.9.2
 Homepage: http://www.opendnssec.org/
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-nlnetlabs/opendnssec.git
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@
 Depends: ${misc:Depends},
 	 opendnssec-enforcer-sqlite3 | opendnssec-enforcer,
 	 opendnssec-signer,
+	 opendnssec-doc,
 	 libhsm-bin
 Recommends: opendnssec-auditor
 Suggests: softhsm
@@ -86,11 +88,27 @@
  .
  This meta-package depends on the standard distribution of OpenDNSSEC.
 
+Package: opendnssec-doc
+Section: misc
+Architecture: all
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}
+Suggests: opendnssec, softhsm
+Replaces: opendnssec-auditor (<< 1:1.3.9-5), opendnssec-signer (<< 1:1.3.9-5), opendnssec-enforcer (<< 1:1.3.9-5), libhsm-bin (<< 1:1.3.9-5)
+Breaks: opendnssec-auditor (<< 1:1.3.9-5), opendnssec-signer (<< 1:1.3.9-5), opendnssec-enforcer (<< 1:1.3.9-5), libhsm-bin (<< 1:1.3.9-5)
+Description: documentation for OpenDNSSEC suite
+ OpenDNSSEC is a complete DNSSEC zone signing system which is very
+ easy to use with stability and security in mind.  There are a lot of
+ details in signing zone files with DNSSEC and OpenDNSSEC covers most
+ of it.
+ .
+ This package contains doxygen documentation for OpenDNSSEC.
+
 Package: opendnssec-enforcer
 Section: admin
 Architecture: all
 Depends: ${misc:Depends},
-	 opendnssec-enforcer-backend
+	 opendnssec-enforcer-backend,
+	 procps
 Recommends: opendnssec-signer, opendnssec-auditor
 Suggests: opendnssec, softhsm
 Description: tool to prepare DNSSEC keys (common package)
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/libhsm-bin.install opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/libhsm-bin.install
--- opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/libhsm-bin.install	2013-01-15 10:30:29.0 +0100
+++ opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/libhsm-bin.install	2013-03-03 16:00:34.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
 usr/bin/ods-hsm*
 usr/share/man/man1/ods-hsm*
-build-sqlite3/libhsm/doxygen-doc/html /usr/share/doc/libhsm-bin/
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-auditor.install opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-auditor.install
--- opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-auditor.install	2013-01-15 10:30:29.0 +0100
+++ opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-auditor.install	2013-03-03 16:00:34.0 +0100
@@ -4,4 +4,3 @@
 usr/lib/opendnssec/kasp_auditor/
 usr/share/man/man1/ods-auditor.1
 usr/share/man/man1/ods-kaspcheck.1
-build-sqlite3/auditor/doc/* /usr/share/doc/opendnssec-auditor/html/
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-doc.dirs opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-doc.dirs
--- opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-doc.dirs	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-doc.dirs	2013-03-03 16:00:34.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+/usr/share/doc/opendnssec-signer/
+/usr/share/doc/opendnssec-enforcer/
+/usr/share/doc/opendnssec-auditor/html/
+/usr/share/doc/libhsm-bin/
diff -Nru opendnssec-1.3.9/debian/opendnssec-

Bug#702173: pu: package openssh/1:5.5p1-6+squeeze3

2013-03-03 Thread Colin Watson 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Moritz Muehlenhoff asked me to take care of a minor security issue (a
potential post-authentication DoS in some configurations;
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-5000).  I don't
think this is a big deal for a DSA, but it'd be good to fix it in
stable.

I can upload the following patch once I have the OK to do so.

diff -Nru openssh-5.5p1/debian/changelog openssh-5.5p1/debian/changelog
--- openssh-5.5p1/debian/changelog  2013-02-08 21:39:18.0 +
+++ openssh-5.5p1/debian/changelog  2013-03-03 14:14:05.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+openssh (1:5.5p1-6+squeeze4) stable; urgency=low
+
+  * CVE-2011-5000: Fix potential int overflow when using gssapi-with-mac
+authentation.
+
+ -- Colin Watson   Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:14:03 +
+
 openssh (1:5.5p1-6+squeeze3) stable; urgency=low
 
   * CVE-2010-5107: Improve DoS resistance by changing default of MaxStartups
diff -Nru openssh-5.5p1/debian/patches/gss-serv-int-overflow.patch 
openssh-5.5p1/debian/patches/gss-serv-int-overflow.patch
--- openssh-5.5p1/debian/patches/gss-serv-int-overflow.patch1970-01-01 
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ openssh-5.5p1/debian/patches/gss-serv-int-overflow.patch2013-03-03 
13:55:52.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Description: Fix potential int overflow when using gssapi-with-mac auth
+Author: Markus Friedl
+Origin: 
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/gss-serv.c?r1=1.23#rev1.23
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Last-Update: 2013-02-03
+
+Index: b/gss-serv.c
+===
+--- a/gss-serv.c
 b/gss-serv.c
+@@ -266,6 +266,8 @@
+   name->length = get_u32(tok+offset);
+   offset += 4;
+ 
++  if (UINT_MAX - offset < name->length)
++  return GSS_S_FAILURE;
+   if (ename->length < offset+name->length)
+   return GSS_S_FAILURE;
+ 
diff -Nru openssh-5.5p1/debian/patches/series 
openssh-5.5p1/debian/patches/series
--- openssh-5.5p1/debian/patches/series 2013-02-08 21:36:03.0 +
+++ openssh-5.5p1/debian/patches/series 2013-03-03 13:56:16.0 +
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 # Security fixes
 forced-command-debug-security.patch
 max-startups-default.patch
+gss-serv-int-overflow.patch
 
 # Versioning
 package-versioning.patch

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@debian.org]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130303143805.ga8...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk

Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze

2013-03-03 Thread Julien Cristau 
Control: retitle -1 openjdk-6 should not be released with jessie
Control: tag -1 + wheezy-ignore

On Sun, Mar  3, 2013 at 14:08:44 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:

> Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 21:35:09 schreef Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the future.
> > 
> > If Matthias keeps the Debian/Ubuntu packaging in a state that it's easily
> > buildable on squeeze/wheezy for ojdk6 and for wheezy on ojdk7 I think
> > we should be able to handle Java updates resource-wise.
> 
> So it seems we are in agreement that it's not feasible to remove OpenJDK-6 
> from Wheezy, and there's the expectation that it can be supported in a 
> relatively acceptable way.
> 
> Perhaps the RT can tag #675495 wheezy-ignore (and retitle). I'm pretty sure 
> we 
> don't want OpenJDK-6 in Jessie.
> 
Alright.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze

2013-03-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst 
Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 21:35:09 schreef Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the future.
> 
> If Matthias keeps the Debian/Ubuntu packaging in a state that it's easily
> buildable on squeeze/wheezy for ojdk6 and for wheezy on ojdk7 I think
> we should be able to handle Java updates resource-wise.

So it seems we are in agreement that it's not feasible to remove OpenJDK-6 
from Wheezy, and there's the expectation that it can be supported in a 
relatively acceptable way.

Perhaps the RT can tag #675495 wheezy-ignore (and retitle). I'm pretty sure we 
don't want OpenJDK-6 in Jessie.


Cheers,
Thijs


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#702167: unblock: lvm2/2.02.95-7

2013-03-03 Thread Bastian Blank 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please ack upload to tpu to fix some bad decisions. It basicly reverts
the removal of clvm, which produced an outcry. Also it disables thin
provisioning support again, as it is neither usable nor save.

--- debian/control  (revision 929)
+++ debian/control  (revision 931)
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian LVM Team 
 Uploaders: Bastian Blank 
-Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~), debhelper (>= 8.1.3~), automake, 
libreadline-gplv2-dev, libselinux1-dev, libudev-dev, pkg-config
+Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~), debhelper (>= 8.1.3~), automake, 
libcman-dev (>> 2), libcorosync-dev, libdlm-dev (>> 2), libreadline-gplv2-dev, 
libselinux1-dev, libudev-dev, openais-dev, pkg-config
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 Homepage: http://sources.redhat.com/lvm2/
 Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-lvm/lvm2/trunk/
@@ -35,6 +35,18 @@
  volume groups can be allocated to logical volumes, which are accessed as
  regular block devices.
 
+Package: clvm
+Priority: extra
+Architecture: any
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, lvm2 (= ${binary:Version}), 
lsb-base
+Recommends: corosync | openais | cman
+Multi-Arch: foreign
+Description: Cluster LVM Daemon for lvm2
+ This package provides the clustering interface for lvm2, when used with
+ Red Hat's "cman" or corosync based (eg Pacemaker) cluster infrastructure.
+ It allows logical volumes to be created on shared storage devices
+ (eg Fibre Channel, or iSCSI).
+
 Package: libdevmapper-dev
 Section: libdevel
 Architecture: any
--- debian/clvm.NEWS(revision 0)
+++ debian/clvm.NEWS(revision 931)
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+lvm2 (2.02.39-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  The cluster locking support is now built as internal support. This
+  means that the lvm config needs to contain the following to use this
+  support.
+
+  global {
+  locking_type = 3
+  }
+
+ -- Bastian Blank   Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:58:27 +0100
--- debian/changelog(revision 929)
+++ debian/changelog(revision 931)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+lvm2 (2.02.95-7) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Re-enable cluster support. (closes: #697676)
+  * Disable thin support. We lack the thin_check binary and it does not work
+anyway. (closes: #702163)
+
+ -- Bastian Blank   Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:45:51 +0100
+
 lvm2 (2.02.95-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Drop cluster (clvm) support. It never properly worked and is more dead
--- debian/rules(revision 929)
+++ debian/rules(revision 931)
@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@
$(CONFIGURE) \
--libdir=\$${exec_prefix}/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \
--with-optimisation="$(CFLAGS_OPT_DEB)" \
-   --with-cluster=none \
-   --with-thin=internal \
+   --with-clvmd=cman,corosync,openais \
+   --with-cluster=internal \
--with-device-uid=0 \
--with-device-gid=6 \
--with-device-mode=0660 \
@@ -160,6 +160,13 @@
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb $(BUILDDEB_ARGS)
 
+install_clvm: export DH_OPTIONS = -pclvm
+install_clvm: DIR = $(BUILD_DIR)/install_deb
+install_clvm: $(STAMPS_DIR)/install_deb
+   +$(MAKE_SELF) install-base-prep INSTALL_DIR='$(DIR)'
+   dh_installinit --no-start -- start 63 S . start 51 0 6 .
+   +$(MAKE_SELF) install-base
+
 install_dmeventd: export DH_OPTIONS = -pdmeventd
 install_dmeventd: DIR = $(BUILD_DIR)/install_deb
 install_dmeventd: $(STAMPS_DIR)/install_deb install_liblvm2
@@ -238,7 +245,7 @@
+$(MAKE_SELF) install-base
 
 binary-indep:
-binary-arch: $(addprefix install_,libdevmapper libdevmapper-udeb 
libdevmapper-event libdevmapper-dev dmsetup dmsetup-udeb dmeventd liblvm2 lvm2 
lvm2-udeb)
+binary-arch: $(addprefix install_,libdevmapper libdevmapper-udeb 
libdevmapper-event libdevmapper-dev dmsetup dmsetup-udeb dmeventd liblvm2 lvm2 
lvm2-udeb clvm)
 
 binary: binary-indep binary-arch
 
--- debian/clvm.init(revision 0)
+++ debian/clvm.init(revision 931)
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+### BEGIN INIT INFO
+# Provides:  clvm
+# Required-Start:lvm2
+# Required-Stop: lvm2
+# Should-Start:  cman corosync openais
+# Should-Stop:   cman corosync openais
+# Default-Start: S
+# Default-Stop:  0 6
+# Short-Description: start and stop the lvm cluster locking daemon
+### END INIT INFO
+#
+# Author: Frederik Schüler 
+# based on the old clvm init script from etch
+# and the clvmd init script from RHEL5
+
+PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin
+DESC="Cluster LVM Daemon"
+NAME=clvm
+DAEMON=/usr/sbin/clvmd
+SCRIPTNAME=/etc/init.d/clvm
+
+[ -x $DAEMON ] || exit 0
+
+. /lib/init/vars.sh
+
+. /lib/lsb/init-functions
+
+if [ ! -f /etc/cluster/cluster.conf ]; then
+   log_failure_msg "clvmd: cluster not configured. Aborting."
+   exit 0
+fi
+
+if ! cman_tool status >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+   log_failure_msg "clvmd: cluster is not running. Aborting."
+

Bug#702109: marked as done (unblock: crystalhd/1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-9)

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:18:30 +0100
with message-id <20130303111830.gc5...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702109: unblock: crystalhd/1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #702109,
regarding unblock: crystalhd/1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-9
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
702109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702109
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package crystalhd

This new package release fixes two release critical bugs related to the
buggy driver that was distributed through a dkms package. Users of the driver
should instead use the crystalhd driver already provided in the mainline
kernel. This package also enables the hardening options which is a release
goal. This was missed in the last upload.

Finally, I did end up bumping the Standards-Version from 3.9.3 to 3.9.4.
I can place it back to 3.9.3, though there was no changes needed when
bumping the Standards-Version to 3.9.4.

Below is the debdiff.

diff -Nru crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/changelog 
crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/changelog
--- crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/changelog  2013-03-02 
14:23:07.0 -0500
+++ crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/changelog  2013-03-02 
13:34:42.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+crystalhd (1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-8) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Remove dkms package which contained buggy driver.
+Driver already existed in mainline kernel. Any issues with the driver
+should be directed to the kernel package.
+(Closes: #682252)
+(Closes: #699470)
+  * Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.4.
+  * Build with hardening options to satisfy Wheezy release goal.
+
+ -- Andres Mejia   Sat, 02 Mar 2013 13:34:36 -0500
+
 crystalhd (1:0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19-7) unstable; urgency=low

   * Include udev rules for crystalhd-dkms.
diff -Nru crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/control 
crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/control
--- crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/control  2013-03-02 
14:23:07.0 -0500
+++ crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/control  2013-03-02 
13:01:17.0 -0500
@@ -3,9 +3,8 @@
 Maintainer: Andres Mejia 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.1.3~),
libgstreamer0.10-dev,
-   libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev,
-   dkms
-Standards-Version: 3.9.3
+   libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev
+Standards-Version: 3.9.4
 Section: libs
 Homepage: http://www.broadcom.com/support/crystal_hd/
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/crystalhd.git
@@ -37,18 +36,6 @@
  .
  This package contains the shared library.

-Package: crystalhd-dkms
-Section: kernel
-Architecture: amd64 i386
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, dkms
-Suggests: linux-headers
-Description: Crystal HD Video Decoder (Linux kernel driver)
- Crystal HD Solution is a product offered by Broadcom. It is used to enable
- flawless playback of 1080p high definition video across a wide range of
- systems.
- .
- This package contains the crystalhd Linux kernel driver.
-
 Package: gstreamer0.10-crystalhd
 Section: video
 Architecture: amd64 i386
diff -Nru crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/crystalhd-dkms.dkms 
crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/crystalhd-dkms.dkms
--- crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/crystalhd-dkms.dkms  2013-03-02 
14:23:07.0 -0500
+++ crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/crystalhd-dkms.dkms  1969-12-31 
19:00:00.0 -0500
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-# DKMS configuration for crystalhd
-
-PACKAGE_NAME="crystalhd"
-PACKAGE_VERSION="#MODULE_VERSION#"
-BUILT_MODULE_NAME[0]="$PACKAGE_NAME"
-BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[0]=driver/linux
-DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[0]="/updates/dkms/"
-AUTOINSTALL=yes
-
-MAKE[0]="cd driver/linux && ./configure && make"
-CLEAN="make -C driver/linux clean distclean"
diff -Nru crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/crystalhd-dkms.install 
crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/crystalhd-dkms.install
--- crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/crystalhd-dkms.install 2013-03-02 
14:23:07.0 -0500
+++ crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/crystalhd-dkms.install 1969-12-31 
19:00:00.0 -0500
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-usr/src
-lib/udev/rules.d
diff -Nru crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/patches/hardening-opts.patch 
crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd2f19/debian/patches/hardening-opts.patch
--- crystalhd-0.0~git20110715.fdd

Bug#702132: unblock: linux/3.2.39-2

2013-03-03 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Sun, Mar  3, 2013 at 00:45:39 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> Most of the changes are under:
> debian/patches/features/all/alx/
> debian/patches/features/all/drm/
> debian/patches/features/all/fermi-accel/ [deleted]
> debian/patches/features/all/iguanair/
> debian/patches/features/all/line6/
> debian/patches/features/all/virtio_scsi/
> for which the diffstat is:
>  153 files changed, 167984 insertions(+), 873 deletions(-)
> This is all new hardware support (with some risk of regressions in
> the drm drivers, but feedback so far is overwhelmingly positive).
> 
I've seen one possible regression report so far, #701743.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: retitle 702115 to unblock: libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 702115 unblock: libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1
Bug #702115 [release.debian.org] libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1' from 
'libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
702115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136230451728567.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#702151: RM: haskell-tls-extra/0.4.6.1-1

2013-03-03 Thread Niels Thykier 
On 2013-03-03 10:07, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
> 
> Please consider removing haskell-tls-extra.  The security backport
> caused a regression that pretty much completely breaks the package
> (#701593), and the upstream bug log seems to indicate a lack of
> interest in supporting older versions:
> https://github.com/vincenthz/hs-tls/issues/32
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> 

CC'ing the maintainers+uploader of the affected, plus the reporter for
comments on this.  Do any of you feel you would be able to write a patch
for it that could be included in Wheezy or ...?

~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51331da3.1050...@thykier.net

Bug#702153: marked as done (Please tag #699301 and #699304 wheezy-ignore)

2013-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:45:14 +0100
with message-id <51331baa.4090...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#702153: Please tag #699301 and #699304 wheezy-ignore
has caused the Debian Bug report #702153,
regarding Please tag #699301 and #699304 wheezy-ignore
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
702153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package: release.debian.org
severity: normal

Bugs #699301 and #699304 are about non-free sRGB files.  #699305,
#699306, etc.about the same issue recently got marked wheezy-ignore. I
believe these bugs should get the same treatment.

Thanks,
Mike
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 699301 + wheezy-can-defer
tags 699301 + wheezy-ignore
usertags 699304 + wheezy-can-defer
tags 699304 + wheezy-ignore

On 2013-03-03 10:15, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> package: release.debian.org
> severity: normal
> 
> Bugs #699301 and #699304 are about non-free sRGB files.  #699305,
> #699306, etc.about the same issue recently got marked wheezy-ignore. I
> believe these bugs should get the same treatment.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> 

Granted, thanks for noticing this.

~Niels--- End Message ---

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-03-03 Thread David Paleino 
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 21:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:21:29 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 20:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:16:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, as we need the issues
> > > > > fixing there in any case, however we proceed; thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > Done, 3.1.0~rc2-2 just uploaded to sid.
> > > 
> > > That was a little over two weeks ago now. Have there been any reported
> > > issues with the package in sid?
> > 
> > None up to now.
> 
> Cool; thanks. Did you have chance to look at whether fixing the testing
> package "just" requires the source file split or if there were any other
> issues?

The package I prepared and built for testing also required 2 other patches, to
fix #683075. I guess that hasn't changed since then :)

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 | http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#702153: Please tag #699301 and #699304 wheezy-ignore

2013-03-03 Thread Michael Gilbert 
package: release.debian.org
severity: normal

Bugs #699301 and #699304 are about non-free sRGB files.  #699305,
#699306, etc.about the same issue recently got marked wheezy-ignore. I
believe these bugs should get the same treatment.

Thanks,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MMVkjRskV=y1sk7r67jbzbufs2entooqdn5uv07p5j...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#702151: RM: haskell-tls-extra/0.4.6.1-1

2013-03-03 Thread Michael Gilbert 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal

Please consider removing haskell-tls-extra.  The security backport
caused a regression that pretty much completely breaks the package
(#701593), and the upstream bug log seems to indicate a lack of
interest in supporting older versions:
https://github.com/vincenthz/hs-tls/issues/32

Thanks,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpsbh7ex7nnzambdowkevxhc75ntokwfxm6mfxnkmm...@mail.gmail.com