Bug#739844: Processed: bug 739844 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-2-1.html
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 22:46:57 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: Hi! I've just saw you added the ben file and I noticed I swaped the good and bad tags. The ben file should then be: is_affected = .depends ~ qtbase-abi-5-2-0 | .depends ~ qtbase-abi-5-2-1; is_good = .depends ~ qtbase-abi-5-2-1; is_bad = .depends ~ qtbase-abi-5-2-0; I'm sorry for the typo, and thanks for setting the page :) Your good and bad seem to match what I set up? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#732219: transition: libmikmod
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 23:59:30 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:46:59 +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 00:15:18 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: I've made libmikmod-dev provide libmikmod2-dev in 3.3.5-2 and uploaded it to experimental. Should I file bugs (with patches...) for heroes and sdl-mixer1.2 now? Yes please. Make them block this bug. Done for sdl-mixer1.2 (#741986); heroes wasn't actually supposed to use mikmod any more, and is orphaned, so I did a QA upload of it (also fixing a couple of other bugs). Thanks. Feel free to upload to sid. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#732219: transition: libmikmod
Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #732219 [release.debian.org] transition: libmikmod Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 732219: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732219 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b732219.139512583029388.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#740090: transition: libiodbc2
¡Hola Julien! El 2014-03-17 a las 22:51 +0100, Julien Cristau escribió: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 17:34:17 +0100, Maximiliano Curia wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition (please explain about the transition: impacted packages, reason, ... for more info see: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions) Requestion a transition slot to upload libiodbc2 3.52.8 to unstable. The transition is needed as the new package moves the headers to /usr/include/iodbc hoping to gain coinstallability with unixodbc. I've submited patches in the affected packages: #740060 #740067 #740074 #740082 Packages that use iodbc-config to get the cflags are not affected (which is only soprano), also libopendbx is not directly affected as it optionaly build-depends on libiodbc2-dev (although it should probably remove the option). do you plan on NMUing with these patches? Yes, as soon as iodbc 3.52.8 enters unstable, the affected packages will ftbfs so a delayed/5 nmu should be ok. Thanks, -- Fighting patents one by one will never eliminate the danger of software patents, any more than swatting mosquitoes will eliminate malaria. -- Richard M. Stallman Saludos /\/\ /\ `/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#740090: transition: libiodbc2
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 08:55:44 +0100, Maximiliano Curia wrote: ¡Hola Julien! El 2014-03-17 a las 22:51 +0100, Julien Cristau escribió: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 17:34:17 +0100, Maximiliano Curia wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition (please explain about the transition: impacted packages, reason, ... for more info see: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions) Requestion a transition slot to upload libiodbc2 3.52.8 to unstable. The transition is needed as the new package moves the headers to /usr/include/iodbc hoping to gain coinstallability with unixodbc. I've submited patches in the affected packages: #740060 #740067 #740074 #740082 Packages that use iodbc-config to get the cflags are not affected (which is only soprano), also libopendbx is not directly affected as it optionaly build-depends on libiodbc2-dev (although it should probably remove the option). do you plan on NMUing with these patches? Yes, as soon as iodbc 3.52.8 enters unstable, the affected packages will ftbfs so a delayed/5 nmu should be ok. If the patches are backwards compatible (ie work with the current iodbc), I'd rather have them in sid *first*. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 731402
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 731402 + pending Bug #731402 [release.debian.org] transition: spatialite Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 731402: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731402 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13951315763702.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#741119: transition: cogl
On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 at 21:33:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: is_affected = .depends ~ /libcogl12|libcogl-pango12|libcogl-gles2-12/ | .depends ~ /libcogl20|libcogl-pango20|libcogl-gles2-20|libcogl-path20/; The transition at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl20.html has Affected: .build-depends ~ /libcogl/ which doesn't seem to match all the relevant packages. I would expect it to affect all the same packages that the abandoned https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl15.html transition does, perhaps by using Emilio's proposed version of is_affected. (Lots of the packages that are involved do not explicitly build-depend on cogl, although in principle perhaps at least some of them should - e.g. empathy checks for cogl-1.0.pc in its configure.ac, and uses it directly in a couple of places, so it should make the dependency explicit.) S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140318093945.ga14...@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk
Bug#724722: All reverse-dependencies build fine now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Now that libmemcached-1.0.18-2 is in experimental, there are no FTBFS bugs left in any of the reverse-dependencies. This should mean that there are no bugs left blocking this transition. Cheers, - -- Michael Fladischer Fladi.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTKBc7AAoJEGlMre9Rx7W2Ng8P/3puitFI3U/7XLErfoKpTrom VH0bFddU9CLVyQlPZ52pxzNFeG2lsIgb4JwaDg9NHE/fJEmz/f63EIJC3zc+O9UY MDy9tBanNLGo1yY925zWH1LC/08EJ5mrpSWWksyWOsK6hqkgo9++UqyTqv317ncJ R7WgwEwn4nX+9lhmDPRTKMJedzqal50PL9KRgRY5gNJNqQ51IORfS42Yw2DOomtu lRhBgON59QOC9gJQNEiEwxjfmbGcpfgKFhP0sfN66DMNP+oNOpWqqpWRDStPtI9M 6BIU3YX+YQAbAG9A9FgynrBxjeOu78yHvJVxuTaTEnWqEIGJnw6A4ehq8KB11wa9 RlHp4ne90LcFJQrwhxDaKDXTnDliTkQdiQKbRQnwR6ZslP5UcliElEbu7Q4TaCQG HQ4Btqbz2yPQRciC25nRFDQkq8tnyMP/LBuPjL/hElA6quEhQx4hxscWvVNefYDK hWzpzD1JiiGaJsPReF+8/Nz4sXnzCkXzqGuIx6B1EkeL4AeMggPDTYYq1MwMtIwt wZcBuCFonw4kTiHWiG+kt8ve3RDyWv/y/4ALQ7NOOQGu6eDxGVJAekuts/tuf9XQ ZqqHFMFk+2ykZu424VsQDMfrxuAU97CCSoz4EfFqWJlGqh6i23gYs6w7CrfbpByw u0ScOyziLtoQqBdN9Ucg =SSb7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5328173b.3010...@fladi.at
Bug#741119: transition: cogl
On 18/03/14 10:39, Simon McVittie wrote: On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 at 21:33:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: is_affected = .depends ~ /libcogl12|libcogl-pango12|libcogl-gles2-12/ | .depends ~ /libcogl20|libcogl-pango20|libcogl-gles2-20|libcogl-path20/; The transition at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl20.html has Affected: .build-depends ~ /libcogl/ which doesn't seem to match all the relevant packages. I would expect it to affect all the same packages that the abandoned https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl15.html transition does, perhaps by using Emilio's proposed version of is_affected. (Lots of the packages that are involved do not explicitly build-depend on cogl, although in principle perhaps at least some of them should - e.g. empathy checks for cogl-1.0.pc in its configure.ac, and uses it directly in a couple of places, so it should make the dependency explicit.) Many packages get a dependency on cogl through clutter (which has cogl in Requires in its pkgconfig file). Some of those use cogl, some others may not. So the affected regex I proposed should indeed work better. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53281eb9.2020...@debian.org
Bug#736494: About #736494
Hi William, 5.4.4-14+deb7u8 didn’t pass our test, but the one you sent me (8.1) works, can you think of any reason why this is happening? Clement On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Clement Wong c...@clement.hk wrote: Hi, I’ve confirm that this package passed our tests, solved sybase problem, and not causing other regressions. Thanks for working on this. Feel free to poke me for any test in the future, our systems are highly integrated with all kinds of MS/MS-compatible products. Like AD/Samba4/SQLSRV/OpenChange etc. Clement On Mar 10, 2014, at 2:47 PM, William Dauchy wdau...@gmail.com wrote: please see: php.tar.gz please don't pay attention to the version numbering. Regards, -- William
Bug#741119: transition: cogl
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:23:53 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 18/03/14 10:39, Simon McVittie wrote: On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 at 21:33:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: is_affected = .depends ~ /libcogl12|libcogl-pango12|libcogl-gles2-12/ | .depends ~ /libcogl20|libcogl-pango20|libcogl-gles2-20|libcogl-path20/; The transition at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl20.html has Affected: .build-depends ~ /libcogl/ which doesn't seem to match all the relevant packages. I would expect it to affect all the same packages that the abandoned https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl15.html transition does, perhaps by using Emilio's proposed version of is_affected. (Lots of the packages that are involved do not explicitly build-depend on cogl, although in principle perhaps at least some of them should - e.g. empathy checks for cogl-1.0.pc in its configure.ac, and uses it directly in a couple of places, so it should make the dependency explicit.) Many packages get a dependency on cogl through clutter (which has cogl in Requires in its pkgconfig file). Some of those use cogl, some others may not. So the affected regex I proposed should indeed work better. I changed it to is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libcogl/ | .depends ~ /libcogl/; Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#736494: About #736494
Ok, sorry for the misleading email, apparently 7u8 is from wheezy-security, so this fix is not applied yet. Clement On Mar 18, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Clement Wong c...@clement.hk wrote: Hi William, 5.4.4-14+deb7u8 didn’t pass our test, but the one you sent me (8.1) works, can you think of any reason why this is happening? Clement On Mar 10, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Clement Wong c...@clement.hk wrote: Hi, I’ve confirm that this package passed our tests, solved sybase problem, and not causing other regressions. Thanks for working on this. Feel free to poke me for any test in the future, our systems are highly integrated with all kinds of MS/MS-compatible products. Like AD/Samba4/SQLSRV/OpenChange etc. Clement On Mar 10, 2014, at 2:47 PM, William Dauchy wdau...@gmail.com wrote: please see: php.tar.gz please don't pay attention to the version numbering. Regards, -- William
Bug#736494: About #736494
On 18 Mar 2014 12:18, Clement Wong c...@clement.hk wrote: Ok, sorry for the misleading email, apparently 7u8 is from wheezy-security, so this fix is not applied yet. Yes indeed.
Bug#741119: transition: cogl
On 18/03/14 12:07, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:23:53 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 18/03/14 10:39, Simon McVittie wrote: On Sat, 08 Mar 2014 at 21:33:59 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: is_affected = .depends ~ /libcogl12|libcogl-pango12|libcogl-gles2-12/ | .depends ~ /libcogl20|libcogl-pango20|libcogl-gles2-20|libcogl-path20/; The transition at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl20.html has Affected: .build-depends ~ /libcogl/ which doesn't seem to match all the relevant packages. I would expect it to affect all the same packages that the abandoned https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libcogl15.html transition does, perhaps by using Emilio's proposed version of is_affected. (Lots of the packages that are involved do not explicitly build-depend on cogl, although in principle perhaps at least some of them should - e.g. empathy checks for cogl-1.0.pc in its configure.ac, and uses it directly in a couple of places, so it should make the dependency explicit.) Many packages get a dependency on cogl through clutter (which has cogl in Requires in its pkgconfig file). Some of those use cogl, some others may not. So the affected regex I proposed should indeed work better. I changed it to is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libcogl/ | .depends ~ /libcogl/; Seems to be working well now. Thanks! Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53283b87.5040...@debian.org
Bug#724722: All reverse-dependencies build fine now
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:51:55 +0100, Michael Fladischer wrote: Now that libmemcached-1.0.18-2 is in experimental, there are no FTBFS bugs left in any of the reverse-dependencies. This should mean that there are no bugs left blocking this transition. In that case feel free to upload to sid. Let us know when binNMUs can be scheduled (ie the package is installed on all archs). Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#724722: All reverse-dependencies build fine now
Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #724722 [release.debian.org] transition: libmemcached Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 724722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724722 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b724722.139515510728148.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 731403
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 731403 + pending Bug #731403 [release.debian.org] transition: librasterlite Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 731403: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731403 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139515938525869.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 739525
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 739525 + pending Bug #739525 [release.debian.org] transition: qscintilla2 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 739525: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739525 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139516030931813.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#741977: marked as done (nmu: logol_1.6.1-1)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:22:08 +0100 with message-id 20140318172208.GA1900@localhost.localdomain and subject line Re: Bug#741977: Acknowledgement (nmu: logol_1.6.1-1) has caused the Debian Bug report #741977, regarding nmu: logol_1.6.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 741977: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741977 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, Please rebuild logol package, it needs to depend on newer version of swi-prolog library (6.6.2 is installed on all architectures). nmu logol_1.6.1-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against swi-prolog 6.6.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Never mind. A new version of swi-prolog was released today. I'll package it first and then request rebuild. 17 березня 2014 о 21:45 + Debian Bug Tracking System написав(-ла): Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian Release Team debian-release@lists.debian.org If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 741...@bugs.debian.org. Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. -- 741977: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741977 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#731402: SpatiaLite transition
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 00:56:48 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: With osgEarth 2.4 and QGIS 2.2 added to the mix, the process becomes: 1) upload spatialite 4.1.1-6 to unstable 2) upload librasterlite 1.1g-4 to unstable 3) binnmu mapnik 2.2.0+ds1-6 in unstable 1 and 2 happened, so I've done 3 (with a dep-wait on librasterlite2). 4) upload libgaiagraphics 0.5-2 to unstable 5) upload spatialite-tools 4.1.1-3 to unstable 6) upload spatialite-gui 1.7.1-3 to unstable 7) upload pyspatialite 3.0.1-5 to unstable 8) binnmu gdal 1.10.1+dfsg-4 in unstable 9) binnmu merkaartor0.18.1-3 in unstable 10) upload osgearth 2.5.0+dfsg-1 to unstable 11) upload qgis 2.2.0-1 to unstable Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#732219: transition: libmikmod
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:57:06 +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Thanks. Feel free to upload to sid. Done, thanks. Regards, Stephen signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Scheduling the 7.5 point release
On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 09:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 21:44 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: We are slowly starting to prepare for the 7.5 point release and are suggesting one of the four following weekends: Based on the replies and looking again at a calendar, let's go for: * April 26th/27th If no-one yells by tomorrow evening then I'll look at getting a proper announcement sorted out. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1395183780.23505.22.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: block 740993 with 742087 742090
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 740993 with 742087 742090 Bug #740993 [release.debian.org] transition: openconnect 740993 was not blocked by any bugs. 740993 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 740993: 742090 and 742087 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 740993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740993 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139519535419737.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#740993: transition: openconnect
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 23:01:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Are there bugs tracking the needed changes in the reverse deps? Bugs are now filed and set to block this bug. Thanks, -- mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature
