Bug#1035310: bullseye-pu: package xz-utils/5.2.11-0~deb11u1
Hello Jonathan, sorry for my late answer, I was on holidays. On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2023-06-26 18:10:57 [+0100], Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > You're both going to have to help me a) understand what is the user-facing > > problem you're solving which is necessary to fix in stable and b) whether > > you're both agreed on how to fix it. > > a) The bpo of manpages-de and manpages-fr contains a manpage for xz. The >regular (non-bpo) package does not contain such the man-page nor does >the package in the following stable contain this man-page. >The user facing problem is the installation of both >manpages-de|manpages-fr and xz-utils/5.2.11-0~deb11u1 because both >provide the same man-page/file and dpkg doesn't like that. That is basically the issue, except that there are several man pages (IIRC, I can check tonight). > b) I *think* we agreed on removing the man-pages from bpo of >manpages-[de|fr] in the next upload if the upload of >xz-utils/5.2.11-0~deb11u1 is confirmed. Otherwise it makes no sense >to anything, the upgrade path bpo -> next-stable is working due to >proper package relations. As always, when such a transfer occurs, I can provide an upload without the affected man pages and with the proper package releations. Now sínce bookworm is released I do not intend to provide any further upload to oldstable and I do not see any reason to processes this issue any further, affected users can upgrade to stable now to get the latest localized man pages from xz-utils proper. If there are technical issues for performing this upload to oldstable and hence actions form my side (to enable smooth upgrading) are needed please let me know. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#1035310: bullseye-pu: package xz-utils/5.2.11-0~deb11u1
Hello Sebastian,
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:17:07PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2023-04-30 18:43:18 [+0200], Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > > - the backport package of manpages-de and manpages-fr provides a
> > > man page for xz. These files conflict with the one provided by
> > > xz-utils package. The bpo package and xz-utils in Bookworm have proper
> > > Breaks: and Replaces: relation to allow smooth upgrades.
> > > This update of xz does not provide such a relation since the current
> > > version of manpages-{de|fr} in Bullseye does not provide this
> > > man page. As per testing, the Breaks: in manpages-{de|fr} forbids
> > > installing of this xz-utils. My understanding is that once these
> > > man pages are visible in Bullseye via xz-utils, the bpo packages of
> > > manpages-l10n stops creating them as part of the build process. They
> > > are not present in testing/ Bookworm version of the package.
> >
> > No, we need to coordinate about this. You previously considered doing
> > a backport and I asked you several if this is still the case; since
> > you did not respond, I did not remove the conflicting pages in my
> > bullseye packport.
>
> I added you to Cc: for reason of coordination. I always intended to do
> -pu instead of a bpo. I intended to respond earlier but didn't manage to
> do it until now. Sorry for that.
Thanks for adding me and we are all overloaded some times.
> > As bookworm is about to release, I just wonder if that is really
> > necessary to introduce the translation files in your backport. I'm all
> > about translations, but this is a bit fragile with two backports with
> > all the upgrade paths. So hopefully we get this right.
>
> Stable Bullseye, no bpo.
I don't know if this ease the situation regarding the required package
relationship.
From my side this is just a few lines in my rules file and the
appropriate package relationships, the latter are the tricky part to
get right.
> > If you still feel this is necessary for your users, then please
> > contact me and I can perform another upload with the file removed and
> > appropriate package relationships. (This implies you tell me the
> > version which introduces the files.)
>
> I'm waiting for the stable team to confirm or deny my request. Once that
> is clear we can see how to move forward.
Ok.
> > Please tell me as well which translated man pages you ship, as there
> > are also Danish and Ukrainian ones in my backports.
> >
> > Please not that I will not perform uploads to bullseye once bookworm
> > has been released.
>
> Only DE and FR made it into the 5.2 series.
So we need to deal with those two "only".
Thus I'm waiting for further information from your side.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#1035310: bullseye-pu: package xz-utils/5.2.11-0~deb11u1
Hello Sebastian,
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 06:23:20PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:xz-utils
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Tags: bullseye
> Severity: normal
>
> This is a stable update of the xz-utils package as provide project's
> upstream (fixes only, no new features).
> A user visible change is that more localized man-pages (de, fr) and
> translations (es, pt, ro, …) for xz are available. The german man pages
> were provided by the manpages-de package (manpages-l10n source package)
> but were dropped shortly before the Bullseye release.
Correct, we discussed this in the past when we reviewed the
appropriate package relationships.
> xz-utils v5.2.7 to v5.2.9 was uploaded to unstable. Lessons learned:
> - the backport package of manpages-de and manpages-fr provides a
> man page for xz. These files conflict with the one provided by
> xz-utils package. The bpo package and xz-utils in Bookworm have proper
> Breaks: and Replaces: relation to allow smooth upgrades.
> This update of xz does not provide such a relation since the current
> version of manpages-{de|fr} in Bullseye does not provide this
> man page. As per testing, the Breaks: in manpages-{de|fr} forbids
> installing of this xz-utils. My understanding is that once these
> man pages are visible in Bullseye via xz-utils, the bpo packages of
> manpages-l10n stops creating them as part of the build process. They
> are not present in testing/ Bookworm version of the package.
No, we need to coordinate about this. You previously considered doing
a backport and I asked you several if this is still the case; since
you did not respond, I did not remove the conflicting pages in my
bullseye packport.
As bookworm is about to release, I just wonder if that is really
necessary to introduce the translation files in your backport. I'm all
about translations, but this is a bit fragile with two backports with
all the upgrade paths. So hopefully we get this right.
If you still feel this is necessary for your users, then please
contact me and I can perform another upload with the file removed and
appropriate package relationships. (This implies you tell me the
version which introduces the files.)
Please tell me as well which translated man pages you ship, as there
are also Danish and Ukrainian ones in my backports.
Please not that I will not perform uploads to bullseye once bookworm
has been released.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#1034411: unblock: manpages-l10n/4.18.1-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: manpages-l...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:manpages-l10n Please unblock package manpages-l10n [ Reason ] manpages-l10n is a (set of) pure documentation packages. It works by downloading the current version of the man pages from the target distribution (here Debian) related to ~ 100 upstream packages. Then the translators update the translations of theses man pages. To be current, this process needs to be performed as late as possible, so that man pages within Debian change as little as possible in this time frame, i.e. the latest version scheduled for Bookworm are used. Due to large scale changes in some upstreams (especially manpages) not all translators were able to perform as much translations as possible in the last version (e.g. Spanish). Also a rather nasty confusion was resolved in German and two translation bugs from the BTS are fixed (#1032881,#1033438). Also other translators (e.g. UK or FR) worked on further translations and updates. Therefor upstream suggested to prepare a minor (last) release targetting bookworm (i.e. 1.18.1). [ Impact ] If the unblock is *not* granted then non-english speakers will see some outdated translations and some missing translations. Especially for less maintained languages the difference is bigger as upstream works hard to keep the translations shipped by performing trivial unfuzzy and translations. But also active teams like french and german are constantily improving the translations. Also German users will have a nasty confusion around the terms NULL/NUL/Zero. [ Tests ] First of all the entire man pages are build daily in a private build setting (automatically), uncovering syntax errors. Closer to the release, additional manually initiated builds are added. All builds are reviewed for (potential) errors. Secondly, the Debian build system (full builds done locally!) also uncovers potential problems, like missing files or directories. Thirdly, linitian checks the entire set of man pages for errors. These linitian errors are mostly harmless, but regularly reviewed as well (and fixed, if possible with reasonable effort). Finally, some random man pages are manually reviewed. However, for languages I don't speak (most of them) this is of limited value. Additionally, I read the upstream git log and sometimes run a git diff if I suspect suspicious changes and interact with most of the translators on them. I'd love to add non superficial auto packaging tests, I'm just a little bit lost which make sense. [ Risks ] The risk is low. This is pure documentation. The new packages are a little bit larger than the old ones on average, but no programm/code works differently because of them. It is also a leaf package and the user can decide to read the english original at any time, e.g. by running LC_ALL=C man command As the set of actual Debian (upstream) packages we translate was not changed sind the last version, changes for new undetected file conflicts are very low. In the higly unlikey case something would be discovered, I can quickly exclude those files and prepare another upload. However, this is not expected at all. Note that upstream started including (but not shipping!) korean translations. They are only in the source and hence pose no problem. Except for this, the entire infrastructure is unchanged since 4.18.0-1. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them See above, the content (translation) I cannot actually review, as I don't speak Danish, Hungarian, French, Swedish, … [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing The debdiff is *huge*, for example because the reference for some other distribution was changed (irrelevant for Debian) and even small changes cause rewarpping of (long) paragraphs. You can pick up the full debdiff here: https://helgefjell.de/data/manpages-l10n-18.0-18.1.debdiff Or a reduced (still large) version here: https://helgefjell.de/data/manpages-l10n-18.0-18.1.r1.debdiff Or a very reduced version here: https://helgefjell.de/data/manpages-l10n-18.0-18.1.r2.debdiff The smallest one excludes the actual translation part (po files) but gives you an idea about the changes which happend. [ Other info ] Do not hesitate to contact me for any question regarding the update, e.g. if the above description is too brief. In case the release is less then ~15 days ahead, I would appreciate a little aging as well. unblock manpages-l10n/4.18.1-1 -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ sig
Bug#1033416: unblock: fakeroot/1.31-1.2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: faker...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:fakeroot Please unblock package fakeroot (Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help the release team to judge the request efficiently. E.g. by filling in the sections below.) [ Reason ] Updated Portuguese and German man page translations. There is no code change at all. All autopkgtest keep on passing. [ Impact ] German and Portuguese users will have a partial english man page. [ Tests ] Fakeroot uses autopkgtest. However, the man page generation is not under test. I looked at the German man pages. Also lintian performs some checks on man pages. [ Risks ] I don't know any. The exact same code is already in Testing/bookworm. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing [ Other info ] The man page translations were outdated. Initially I added them in early January with the maintainer approval, however, in subsequent uploads the update somehow got lost. So they were already in Sid for ~ 1 month without any problem. unblock fakeroot/1.31-1.2 -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ diff -Nru fakeroot-1.31/debian/changelog fakeroot-1.31/debian/changelog --- fakeroot-1.31/debian/changelog 2023-03-02 07:44:38.0 +0100 +++ fakeroot-1.31/debian/changelog 2023-03-18 10:22:00.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +fakeroot (1.31-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload with maintainer approval. + * Update manpage translation +- German translation. + Thanks Erik Pfannenstein (Closes: #977854) +- Portuguese translation. + Thanks Américo Monteiro (Closes: #1000794) + + -- Helge Kreutzmann Sat, 18 Mar 2023 10:22:00 +0100 + fakeroot (1.31-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload diff -Nru fakeroot-1.31/debian/patches/man_de.patch fakeroot-1.31/debian/patches/man_de.patch --- fakeroot-1.31/debian/patches/man_de.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ fakeroot-1.31/debian/patches/man_de.patch 2023-03-18 10:22:00.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,419 @@ +Subject: German translation for the manpage (po4a) +Author: Pfannenstein Erik +Date: 2020-12-21 +Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/977854 +Forwarded: No + +I have updated the German translation of fakeroot's manpage. +Please include it into the package as you see fit. + +--- a/doc/po4a/po/de.po b/doc/po4a/po/de.po +@@ -3,20 +3,22 @@ + # 2009 Regis Duchesne. + # This file is distributed under the same license as the fakeroot package. + # Copyright (C) of this file 2011 Chris Leick. ++# Copyright (C) of this file 2020 Erik Pfannenstein. + # + msgid "" + msgstr "" + "Project-Id-Version: fakeroot 1.18.1-1\n" + "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: faker...@packages.debian.org\n" + "POT-Creation-Date: 2020-09-22 16:23-0400\n" +-"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-10-18 23:27+0200\n" +-"Last-Translator: Chris Leick \n" ++"PO-Revision-Date: 2020-10-06 01:14+0200\n" ++"Last-Translator: Erik Pfannnenstein \n" + "Language-Team: German \n" + "Language: de\n" + "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" + "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" + "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" + "Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" ++"X-Generator: Poedit 2.4.1\n" + + # type: TH + #. type: TH +@@ -29,7 +31,7 @@ + #: ../doc/fakeroot.1:16 + #, no-wrap + msgid "5 October 2014" +-msgstr "" ++msgstr "5. Oktober 2014" + + # type: TH + #. type: TH +@@ -46,8 +48,8 @@ + msgstr "Debian-Handbuch" + + # type: SH +-#. Manpage by J.H.M. Dassen +-#. and Clint Adams ++#. Manpage by J.H.M. Dassen ++#. and Clint Adams + #. type: SH + #: ../doc/fakeroot.1:19 ../doc/faked.1:19 + #, no-wrap +@@ -62,7 +64,7 @@ + "manipulation" + msgstr "" + "fakeroot - einen Befehl zur Dateimanipulation in einer Umgebung mit " +-"gefälschten Root-Rechten ausführen" ++"fingierten Root-Rechten ausführen" + + # type: SH + #. type: SH +@@ -80,7 +82,7 @@ + "fd-base ]> B<[-h|--help ]> B<[-v|--version ]> B<[--]> B<[command]>" + msgstr "" + "B B<[-l|--lib> I B<[--faked> " +-"IB<]> B<[-i> IB<]> B<[-s> " ++"IB<]> B<[-i> IB<]> B<[-s> " + "IB<]> B<[-u|--unknown-is-real ]> B<[-b|--fd-base ]>
Bug#1033125: unblock: manpages-l10n/4.18.0-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: manpages-l...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:manpages-l10n Please unblock package manpages-l10n [ Reason ] manpages-l10n is a (set of) pure documentation packages. It works by downloading the current version of the man pages from the target distribution (here Debian) related to ~ 100 upstream packages. Then the translators update the translations of theses man pages. To be current, this process needs to be performed as late as possible, so that man pages within Debian change as little as possible in this time frame, i.e. the latest version scheduled for Bookworm are used. Thus the latest release (and upload to Debian) was synced to be just before the hard freeze with an approximate 2 weeks window for the final translation updates. [ Impact ] If the unblock is *not* granted then non-english speakers will see some outdated translations and some missing translations. Especially for less maintained languages the difference is bigger as upstream works hard to keep the translations shipped by performing trivial unfuzzy and translations. But also active teams like french and german are constantily improving the translations. [ Tests ] First of all the entire man pages are build daily in a private build setting (automatically), uncovering syntax errors. Closer to the release, additional manually initiated builds are added. All builds are reviewed for (potential) errors. Secondly the Debian build system (full builds done locally!) also uncovers potential problems, like missing files or directories. Thirdly, linitian checks the entire set of man pages for errors. These linitian errors are mostly harmless, but regularly reviewed as well (and fixed, if possible with reasonable effort). Finally, some random man pages are manually reviewed. However, for languages I don't speak (most of them) this is of limited value. Additionally, I read the upstream git log and sometimes run a git diff if I suspect suspicious changes and interact with most of the translators on them. I'd love to add non superficial auto packaging tests, I'm just a little bit lost which make sense. [ Risks ] The risk is low. This is pure documentation. The new packages are a little bit larger than the old ones on average, but no programm/code works differently because of them. It is also a leaf package and the user can decide to read the english original at any time, e.g. by running LC_ALL=C man command As the set of actual Debian (upstream) packages we translate was not changed sind the last version, changes for new undetected file conflicts are very low. In the higly unlikey case something would be discovered, I can quickly exclude those files and prepare another upload. However, this is not expected at all. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them See above, the content (translation) I cannot actually review, as I don't speak Danish, Hungarian, French, Swedish, … [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing The debdiff is *huge*, for example because the reference for some other distribution was changed (irrelevant for Debian) and even small changes cause rewarpping of (long) paragraphs. You can pick up the full debdiff here: http://www.helgefjell.de/data/manpages-l10n-17-18.debdiff Or a reduced (still large) version here: http://www.helgefjell.de/data/manpages-l10n-17-18.2.debdiff Or a very reduced version here: http://www.helgefjell.de/data/manpages-l10n-17-18.debdiff The smallest one excludes the actual translation part (po files) but gives you an idea about the changes which happend. [ Other info ] Do not hesitate to contact me for any question regarding the update, e.g. if the above description is too brief. unblock manpages-l10n/4.18.0-1 -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#989854: unblock: manpages-l10n/4.10.0-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" Please unblock package manpages-l10n [ Reason ] manpages-l10n contains (translated) man pages for > 100 source packages. Upstream prepared a new version which contained many updated and improved man page translations. In case a string is not translated, the current english text is shown (due to po4a). This package does not contain any binary/programme. [ Impact ] Some translations had errors (which have been fixed) and many strings and man pages are now translated, giving non native users a better experience when reading (localized) man pages. For example, many more openssh pages are now available in German. [ Tests ] Upstream (I'm part of upstream) runs nightly builds of all man pages in all languages, checking for (build) errors. Furthermore upstream regularly reviews (where possible) incoming translations. Also more users started reporting typos in the recent months (at least for German). [ Risks ] This is a leaf and documentation package, servicing our users speaking languages different from English. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing Attached: debdiff --exclude "upstreambug" --exclude "upstream" --exclude "templates" --exclude "po" --exclude copyright --exclude create-authors-file.sh --exclude README.md manpages-l10n_4.9.3-4.dsc manpages-l10n_4.10.0-1.dsc [ Other info ] Today a problem with the upgrade path for users using buster backports was discovered (see #989799). We are currently working on the proper fix. At the moment it looks like the fix will require another upload to debian backports. If possible, I would like to use 4.10.0-1 to backport (once accepted in stable) and deploying the fix there, instead of basing the fix on 4.9.3-3. Also I did not enable Czech and Danish, since we are in a deep freeze. Both would introduce new (binary) packages. (Both are new in upstream in this release). unblock manpages-l10n/4.10.0-1 -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ diff -Nru --exclude upstreambug --exclude upstream --exclude templates --exclude po --exclude copyright --exclude create-authors-file.sh --exclude README.md manpages-l10n-4.9.3/AUTHORS.md manpages-l10n-4.10.0/AUTHORS.md --- manpages-l10n-4.9.3/AUTHORS.md 2021-03-09 20:24:24.0 +0100 +++ manpages-l10n-4.10.0/AUTHORS.md 2021-06-13 18:54:49.0 +0200 @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ ## Brazilian Portuguese: * Ademar de Souza Reis Jr. -* André L. Fassone Canova * André Luiz Fassone * Antonio Belloni * Carlos Augusto Horylka @@ -157,7 +156,6 @@ * Thierry Vignaud * Thomas Blein * Thomas Huriaux -* Thomas Vincent * Thomas Vincent * Valéry Perrin * Yves Rütschlé @@ -174,7 +172,6 @@ * Daniel Kobras * David Thamm * Dennis Stampfer -* Dr. Helge Kreutzmann * Dr. Tobias Quathamer * Eduard Bloch * Elmar Jansen @@ -231,10 +228,40 @@ * Wolfgang Jung +## Hungarian: + +* Ámon Tamás +* Böszörményi Zoltán +* Csehi András +* Daczi László +* Dyekiss Emil +* Farkas Zsolt +* Fehér -Aries- János +* Fejős Tamás +* Füley István +* Gombai Sándor +* Hermann Benedek +* Horváth András +* Kovács Emese +* Kővári Péter +* Magyari Miklós +* Mező Tamás +* Molnár Attila +* Nagy Ernő +* Nagy Viktor +* Németh Péter +* Szabó Zsolt +* Szalay Attila +* Tenkes Csaba +* Tevesz Tamás +* Tímár András +* Váraljai Nándor +* Zelena Endre + + ## Italian: * Alessandro Rubini -* Antonio Colombo * Antonio Giovanni Colombo * Augusto Lenardi * Beatrice Torracca diff -Nru --exclude upstreambug --exclude upstream --exclude templates --exclude po --exclude copyright --exclude create-authors-file.sh --exclude README.md manpages-l10n-4.9.3/CHANGES.md manpages-l10n-4.10.0/CHANGES.md --- manpages-l10n-4.9.3/CHANGES.md 2021-03-09 20:24:24.0 +0100 +++ manpages-l10n-4.10.0/CHANGES.md 2021-06-13 18:54:49.0 +0200 @@ -1,5 +1,12 @@ # Changelog for manpages-l10n +## Version 4.10.0 +*Mon Jun 13 18:49:01 CET 2021* + +* Enable Czech and Danish translations +* Hungarian is still disabled; still not completely imported +* Updated and added many translations + ## Version 4.9.3 *Tue Mar 09 20:22:17 CET 2021* diff -Nru --exclude upstreambug --exclude upstream --exclude templates --exclude po --exclude copyright --exclude create-authors-file.sh --exclude README.md manpages-l10n-4.9.3/configure manpages-l10n-4.10.0/configure --- manpages-l10n-4.9.3/configure 2021-03-09 20:24:24.0 +0100 +++ ma
Bug#986906: unblock: apt-listchanges/3.24
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: Craig Small
Please unblock package apt-listchanges
[ Reason ]
Before the last upload (and orphaning) the english man page was
altered. This upload *only* updates two translations (Portuguese and
German). It is a pure l10n upload only.
[ Impact ]
Portuguese and German speaking uses will see some strings in the man
page in English instead of Protuguese and German, respectively.
[ Tests ]
No. However, the build log clearly shows that the man page is build
and installed fine.
[ Risks ]
The code is unchanged. In case there is a problem with the modified
files, users are either dropped back to english automatically (i.e.
the same as now) or can do so manually. Users of other locales are not
affected by this change at all.
[ Checklist ]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing
root@samd:/tmp# debdiff --control --no-diffstat apt-listchanges_3.24_all.deb
apt-listchanges_3.23_all.deb
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Installed-Size: [-423-] {+424+}
Version: [-3.24-] {+3.23+}
root@samd:/tmp# debdiff --control --no-diffstat
apt-listchanges_3.23_amd64.changes apt-listchanges_3.24_amd64.changes
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Installed-Size: [-424-] {+423+}
Version: [-3.23-] {+3.24+}
There is no .dsc file to compare the contents with debdiff.
The new changelog entry is:
apt-listchanges (3.24) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload
* Update Portuguese man page translation (closes: #982824). Thanks Américo
Monteiro.
* Update German man page translation (closes: #982637). Thanks Helge
Kreutzmann.
-- Helge Kreutzmann Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:06:44 +0200
And only the de.po and pt.po are updated (besides this changelog entry)
[ Other info ]
My sponsor properly include the code in the salsa repository so that
future maintainers can easily pick them up.
unblock apt-listchanges/3.24
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#985139: unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.3-1
retitle 985139 unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.3-4 thanks Hello Ivo, On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:35:56PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > retitle 985139 unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.3-3 > tags 985139 - moreinfo > thanks > > Hello Ivo, > On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo > > > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > Please unblock package manpages-l10n > > > > In General, I think this is ok, if the issues below can be fixed fairly > > soon. > > > > [...] > > > > > Furthermore, I finally managed to contact Javier Fernández-Sanguino > > > Peña, and we agreed that the very outdated spanish man page > > > translations are taken over by manpages-l10n, manpages-es-extra is > > > asked for removal. > > > > The current version has this in debian/control: > > > > Replaces: manpages-es (<= 1.55-10), manpages-es-extraA > > > > That's clearly a typo. Please fix this first. When that fix is in unstable, > > please remove the moreinfo tag from this bug and retitle it as needed. > > > > I assume you tested the upgrade scenario from manpages-es-extra to the > > packages that currently contain the manpages? > > I now tested the scenario, sorry for not doing this in the last > upload. Thanks for spotting. Sigh, I did not check all instances, where upstream claimed to remove files, now done. > > > I can prepare the debdiff, but it will contain lots of changes, since > > > many man pages had updated (even if only due to po4a reformatting > > > them). > > > > Could you prepare a filtered debdiff between the version currently in > > testing > > and the new upload to unstable, that doesn't contain the translation > > changes. > > Also, please mention the command you used to do the filtering. > > I used: > debdiff --exclude "upstreambug" --exclude "upstream" --exclude "templates" > --exclude "po" --exclude copyright --exclude create-authors-file.sh --exclude > README.md ./4.9.1-7/manpages-l10n_4.9.1-7.dsc > ./4.9.3-3/manpages-l10n_4.9.3-3.dsc > > The filtered debdiff is attached. The updated filtered debdiff is attached, same filters. > > > [ Other info ] > > > If there is any open question regarding this unblock, I'm most happy > > > to provide it. > > > > > > In the changelog unfortunately there is a typo, the new upstream > > > versio is indeed 4.9.3, *not* 4.9.1. > > > > As a new upload is needed anyway, you can fix this too. > > This is fixed as well (was already fixed in git). > > unblock manpages-l10n/4.9.3-3 unblock manpages-l10n/4.9.3-4 Thanks Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ diff -Nru --exclude upstreambug --exclude upstream --exclude templates --exclude po --exclude copyright --exclude create-authors-file.sh --exclude README.md manpages-l10n-4.9.1/aclocal.m4 manpages-l10n-4.9.3/aclocal.m4 --- manpages-l10n-4.9.1/aclocal.m4 2021-02-06 21:39:51.0 +0100 +++ manpages-l10n-4.9.3/aclocal.m4 2021-03-09 20:24:24.0 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# generated automatically by aclocal 1.16.2 -*- Autoconf -*- +# generated automatically by aclocal 1.16.3 -*- Autoconf -*- # Copyright (C) 1996-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ m4_ifndef([AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS], [m4_defun([_AM_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS], [])m4_defun([AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS], [_AM_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS($@)])]) m4_ifndef([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION], [m4_copy([m4_PACKAGE_VERSION], [AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION])])dnl -m4_if(m4_defn([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION]), [2.70],, -[m4_warning([this file was generated for autoconf 2.70. +m4_if(m4_defn([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION]), [2.71],, +[m4_warning([this file was generated for autoconf 2.71. You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed to. If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely. To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically 'autoreconf'.])]) @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ [am__api_version='1.16' dnl Some users find AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION and mistake it for a way to dnl require some minimum version. Point them to the right macro. -m4_if([$1], [1.16.2], [], +m4_if([$1], [1.16.3], [], [AC_FATAL([Do not call $0, use AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([$1]).])])dnl ]) @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ # Call AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION and AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION so they can be traced. # This
Bug#985139: unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.3-1
retitle 985139 unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.3-3
tags 985139 - moreinfo
thanks
Hello Ivo,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
>
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Please unblock package manpages-l10n
>
> In General, I think this is ok, if the issues below can be fixed fairly soon.
>
> [...]
>
> > Furthermore, I finally managed to contact Javier Fernández-Sanguino
> > Peña, and we agreed that the very outdated spanish man page
> > translations are taken over by manpages-l10n, manpages-es-extra is
> > asked for removal.
>
> The current version has this in debian/control:
>
> Replaces: manpages-es (<= 1.55-10), manpages-es-extraA
>
> That's clearly a typo. Please fix this first. When that fix is in unstable,
> please remove the moreinfo tag from this bug and retitle it as needed.
>
> I assume you tested the upgrade scenario from manpages-es-extra to the
> packages that currently contain the manpages?
I now tested the scenario, sorry for not doing this in the last
upload. Thanks for spotting.
> > I can prepare the debdiff, but it will contain lots of changes, since
> > many man pages had updated (even if only due to po4a reformatting
> > them).
>
> Could you prepare a filtered debdiff between the version currently in testing
> and the new upload to unstable, that doesn't contain the translation changes.
> Also, please mention the command you used to do the filtering.
I used:
debdiff --exclude "upstreambug" --exclude "upstream" --exclude "templates"
--exclude "po" --exclude copyright --exclude create-authors-file.sh --exclude
README.md ./4.9.1-7/manpages-l10n_4.9.1-7.dsc
./4.9.3-3/manpages-l10n_4.9.3-3.dsc
The filtered debdiff is attached.
> > [ Other info ]
> > If there is any open question regarding this unblock, I'm most happy
> > to provide it.
> >
> > In the changelog unfortunately there is a typo, the new upstream
> > versio is indeed 4.9.3, *not* 4.9.1.
>
> As a new upload is needed anyway, you can fix this too.
This is fixed as well (was already fixed in git).
unblock manpages-l10n/4.9.3-3
> Thanks,
Me as well: thanks
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
diff -Nru --exclude upstreambug --exclude upstream --exclude templates
--exclude po --exclude copyright --exclude create-authors-file.sh --exclude
README.md manpages-l10n-4.9.1/aclocal.m4 manpages-l10n-4.9.3/aclocal.m4
--- manpages-l10n-4.9.1/aclocal.m4 2021-02-06 21:39:51.0 +0100
+++ manpages-l10n-4.9.3/aclocal.m4 2021-03-09 20:24:24.0 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# generated automatically by aclocal 1.16.2 -*- Autoconf -*-
+# generated automatically by aclocal 1.16.3 -*- Autoconf -*-
# Copyright (C) 1996-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
m4_ifndef([AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS], [m4_defun([_AM_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS],
[])m4_defun([AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS], [_AM_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS($@)])])
m4_ifndef([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION],
[m4_copy([m4_PACKAGE_VERSION], [AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION])])dnl
-m4_if(m4_defn([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION]), [2.70],,
-[m4_warning([this file was generated for autoconf 2.70.
+m4_if(m4_defn([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION]), [2.71],,
+[m4_warning([this file was generated for autoconf 2.71.
You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed to.
If you have problems, you may need to regenerate the build system entirely.
To do so, use the procedure documented by the package, typically
'autoreconf'.])])
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
[am__api_version='1.16'
dnl Some users find AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION and mistake it for a way to
dnl require some minimum version. Point them to the right macro.
-m4_if([$1], [1.16.2], [],
+m4_if([$1], [1.16.3], [],
[AC_FATAL([Do not call $0, use AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([$1]).])])dnl
])
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
# Call AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION and AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION so they can be traced.
# This function is AC_REQUIREd by AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.
AC_DEFUN([AM_SET_CURRENT_AUTOMAKE_VERSION],
-[AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION([1.16.2])dnl
+[AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION([1.16.3])dnl
m4_ifndef([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION],
[m4_copy([m4_PACKAGE_VERSION], [AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION])])dnl
_AM_AUTOCONF_VERSION(m4_defn([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION]))])
@@ -370,12 +370,7 @@
[AC_REQUIRE([AM_AUX_DIR_EXPAND])dnl
AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE([missing])dnl
if test x"${MISSING+set}" != xset; then
- case $am_aux_dir in
- *\ * | *\*)
-MISSING="\${SHELL} \"$am_aux_dir/missing\"" ;;
- *)
-MISSING="\${SHELL} $am_aux_di
Bug#985139: unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.3-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" , Javier
Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Please unblock package manpages-l10n
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team to judge the request efficiently. E.g. by
filling in the sections below.)
[ Reason ]
manpages-l10n contains (translated) man pages for > 100 source
packages. Shortly before the hard freeze, upstream synced the version
of the (english) man pages in Debian and prepared a new release. Due
to po4a this either contains the updated translation (if available) or
the current english texts. Therefore, the translated man pages in
4.9.3-1 are now in sync what is shipped with Bullseye.
Furthermore, I finally managed to contact Javier Fernández-Sanguino
Peña, and we agreed that the very outdated spanish man page
translations are taken over by manpages-l10n, manpages-es-extra is
asked for removal.
[ Impact ]
Some translated man pages are out of date (in 4.9.1-7), giving users
reading them outdated (or possibly wrong) information.
Spanish users will miss some translations, since manpages-es-extra is
not available any more and the corresponding translations in
manpages-l10n would not be shipped (they were deliberately not present
in 4.9.1-7, where I had not been able to contact Javier).
[ Tests ]
Upstream (I'm part of upstream) runs nightly builds of all man pages
in all languages, checking for (build) errors. Furthermore upstream
regularly reviews (where possible) incoming translations.
[ Risks ]
This is a leaf and documentation package, servicing our users speaking
languages different from English.
[ Checklist ]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing
I can prepare the debdiff, but it will contain lots of changes, since
many man pages had updated (even if only due to po4a reformatting
them).
[ Other info ]
If there is any open question regarding this unblock, I'm most happy
to provide it.
In the changelog unfortunately there is a typo, the new upstream
versio is indeed 4.9.3, *not* 4.9.1.
unblock manpages-l10n/4.9.3-1
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#982480: unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.2-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: Mario Blättermann , Craig Small Please unblock package manpages-l10n This version will be upload soon and I need your advise. Please note that 4.9.2-1 has (as of this writing) not yet hit the archive and will go through NEW unfortunately. I give a brief background for the unfortunate situation for this package in [ Other info ] below. [ Reason ] manpages-l10n contains translations of manpages contained in Debian into many languages. This is achieved by downloading the manpages from Debian Unstable, converting them into po files, translating them and if the translation is 80% or more complete, including it in the next release. To have current translations for bullsey, upstream agreed to provide a release close to the Freeze date. This release has happend last weekend. "Unfortunately" afterwards psmics and procps decided to ship translated man pages themeselves (which in itself is good), which required them to be excluded by manpages-l10n. To cater for this, upstream has made another release today (4.9.2) which I will package in a moment and and ask my current sponsor (Craig) for upload. Since we ship new languages (i.e. packages), manpages-l10n will need to get through NEW and will not be able to reach the freeze date by 2021-02-12. The rationale for this is in [ Other info ]. Now to the question: Due to the late changes, the upstream version now contains man pages shipped in manpages-es-extra. Some time ago, we requested this package to be removed (#980885), as we believe, shipping this package is a disservice to Debian users. However, the maintainer has not responded. 4.9.2-1 will not ship the files, so no conflict is present, but ideally manpages-es-extra would be removed and the much (!) more current files would be shipped by manpages-es (from manpages-l10n). If you feel this is possible, I would prepare another upload for this. [ Impact ] a) Some users will get old translations, i.e. from October, b) some (for ES, IT and MK) will get no current translated man pages at all. [ Tests ] There is no code, but I rebuild the entire set of man pages daily (also during the build) and look for possible build errors. [ Risks ] This is a leave and pure documentation package. Users can always switch to the english man page if for whatever reason there should be a problem with the translation. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing If an debdiff is really required, please tell me the version you would like to have it against. [ Other info ] Toddy, the original (and main) maintainer is caught in real life, so he transferred me (a Debian maintainer) the appropriate rights to upload manpages-l10n. Howerver, as DM I'm not allowed to get packages through NEW (needed to support ES, IT and MK) and hence I spend the last weeks looking for a DD who could sponser this upload. Fortunately, Craig was so kind to fill in this role. Once NEW is passed I'm available and capable of performing subsequent uploads (if necessary), i.e. for fixing further bugs. (I'm a DM for ~ 10 years) If you need any further information regarding the unblock request, I'm available and usually respond within 24 hours latest. unblock manpages-l10n/4.9.2-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#852825: unblock: zapping/0.10~cvs6-11
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package zapping Zapping in testing segfaults immediately upon startup, which was reported as #852018. This QA upload fixes the crash with a targeted patch, it does not change anything else in the packaging. helge@samd:/tmp$ debdiff zapping_0.10~cvs6-10.dsc zapping_0.10~cvs6-11.dsc diff -Nru zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/changelog zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/changelog --- zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/changelog 2015-09-04 18:41:01.0 +0200 +++ zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/changelog 2017-01-26 19:25:31.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +zapping (0.10~cvs6-11) unstable; urgency=medium + + * QA upload. + * Apply patch from Bernhard Übelacker to fix segfault; Closes: #852018. + + + -- Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de> Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:25:31 +0100 + zapping (0.10~cvs6-10) unstable; urgency=medium * QA upload. diff -Nru zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/patches/18-Fix-Segfault.patch zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/patches/18-Fix-Segfault.patch --- zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/patches/18-Fix-Segfault.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/patches/18-Fix-Segfault.patch 2017-01-26 19:25:31.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +From 1ab9edb2b93ee6b8c01f439309d3417a8e8c1344 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: =?UTF-8?q?Bernhard=20=C3=9Cbelacker?= <bernha...@mailbox.org> +Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:16:23 +0100 +Subject: Fix alloc_aligned on 64bit. + +Even better would probably be to define HAVE_MEMALIGN. + +https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852018 +--- + +Index: zapping-0.10cvs6/common/alloc.c +=== +--- zapping-0.10cvs6.orig/common/alloc.c zapping-0.10cvs6/common/alloc.c +@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ alloc_aligned(size_t size, unsigned int + if (!(b = malloc(size + align))) + return NULL; + +- p = (void *)(((long)((char *) b + align)) & -align); ++ p = (void *)(((size_t)((char *) b + ((size_t)align))) & -((size_t)align)); + + ((void **) p)[-1] = b; + diff -Nru zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/patches/series zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/patches/series --- zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/patches/series 2015-09-04 18:37:27.0 +0200 +++ zapping-0.10~cvs6/debian/patches/series 2017-01-26 19:25:00.0 +0100 @@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ 15-Misc-warnings.patch 16-Glib-single-include.patch 17-Do-not-show-the-build-date.patch +18-Fix-Segfault.patch unblock zapping/0.10~cvs6-11 -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#774284: unblock: goobox/3.3.1-6
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package goobox The update is a pure l10n update. The changelog reads: goobox (3.3.1-6) unstable; urgency=low * po/hu.po updated from upstream git. -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:39:25 +0100 A debdiff against the version in testing (-5) is attached. unblock goobox/3.3.1-6 -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ diff -Nru goobox-3.3.1/debian/changelog goobox-3.3.1/debian/changelog --- goobox-3.3.1/debian/changelog 2014-11-15 16:52:19.0 +0100 +++ goobox-3.3.1/debian/changelog 2014-12-30 21:39:47.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +goobox (3.3.1-6) unstable; urgency=low + + * po/hu.po updated from upstream git. + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:39:25 +0100 + goobox (3.3.1-5) unstable; urgency=low * po/fi.po updated from upstream git. diff -Nru goobox-3.3.1/debian/copyright goobox-3.3.1/debian/copyright --- goobox-3.3.1/debian/copyright 2014-11-15 16:51:46.0 +0100 +++ goobox-3.3.1/debian/copyright 2014-12-30 21:38:58.0 +0100 @@ -686,8 +686,8 @@ /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 Files: po/hu.po -Copyright: 2013 Balázs Úr urbal...@src.gnome.org - 2005,2006,2010 Gabor Kelemen kelem...@gnome.hu +Copyright: 2013,2014 Balázs Úr urbal...@src.gnome.org + 2005,2006,2010 Gabor Kelemen kelem...@gnome.hu 2005 Laszlo Dvornik dvor...@gnome.hu License: GPL-2+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify diff -Nru goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/series goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/series --- goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/series 2014-11-15 16:49:00.0 +0100 +++ goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/series 2014-12-30 21:37:21.0 +0100 @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ update_eu.patch update_id.patch update_fi.patch +update_hu.patch diff -Nru goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/update_hu.patch goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/update_hu.patch --- goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/update_hu.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/update_hu.patch 2014-12-30 21:38:36.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,1235 @@ +Index: goobox-3.3.1-6/po/hu.po +=== +--- goobox-3.3.1-6.orig/po/hu.po goobox-3.3.1-6/po/hu.po +@@ -1,92 +1,50 @@ + # Hungarian translation of goobox. +-# Copyright (C) 2005, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ++# Copyright (C) 2005, 2010, 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. + # This file is distributed under the same license as the goobox package. + # + # Gabor Kelemen kelemeng at gnome dot hu, 2005, 2010. +-# Balázs Úr urbalazs at gmail dot com, 2013. ++# Balázs Úr urbalazs at gmail dot com, 2013, 2014. + msgid + msgstr + Project-Id-Version: goobox master\n + Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?; + product=gooboxkeywords=I18N+L10Ncomponent=general\n +-POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-05 16:22+\n +-PO-Revision-Date: 2013-04-03 09:15+0200\n +-Last-Translator: Balázs Úr urbalazs at gmail dot com\n +-Language-Team: Hungarian gnome at fsf dot hu\n +-Language: \n ++POT-Creation-Date: 2014-12-20 21:23+\n ++PO-Revision-Date: 2014-12-21 10:01+0100\n ++Last-Translator: Balázs Úr urbal...@gmail.com\n ++Language-Team: Hungarian openscope at googlegroups dot com\n ++Language: hu\n + MIME-Version: 1.0\n + Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n + Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n + Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n + X-Generator: Lokalize 1.2\n + +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:165 +-#, c-format +-msgid File is not a valid .desktop file +-msgstr A fájl nem egy érvényes .desktop fájl +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:190 +-#, c-format +-msgid Unrecognized desktop file Version '%s' +-msgstr Ismeretlen .desktop fájl verzió: „%s” +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:970 +-#, c-format +-msgid Starting %s +-msgstr %s indítása +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:1112 +-#, c-format +-msgid Application does not accept documents on command line +-msgstr Az alkalmazás nem fogad el dokumentumokat a parancssorban +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:1180 +-#, c-format +-msgid Unrecognized launch option: %d +-msgstr Ismeretlen indítási kapcsoló: %d +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:1385 +-#, c-format +-#| msgid Can't pass document URIs to a 'Type=Link' desktop entry +-msgid
Bug#769708: unblock: goobox/3.3.1-5
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package goobox A pure translation update: update po/fi.po from upstream.git (include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing) Changes: goobox (3.3.1-5) unstable; urgency=low . * po/fi.po updated from upstream git. A debdiff is attached. unblock goobox/3.3.1-5 -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ diff -Nru goobox-3.3.1/debian/changelog goobox-3.3.1/debian/changelog --- goobox-3.3.1/debian/changelog 2014-07-06 07:42:17.0 +0200 +++ goobox-3.3.1/debian/changelog 2014-11-15 16:52:19.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +goobox (3.3.1-5) unstable; urgency=low + + * po/fi.po updated from upstream git. + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:51:50 +0100 + goobox (3.3.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Switch build dependency libdiscid0-dev → libdiscid-dev as requested by diff -Nru goobox-3.3.1/debian/copyright goobox-3.3.1/debian/copyright --- goobox-3.3.1/debian/copyright 2014-05-25 20:32:04.0 +0200 +++ goobox-3.3.1/debian/copyright 2014-11-15 16:51:46.0 +0100 @@ -624,7 +624,8 @@ /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 Files: po/fi.po -Copyright: 2013 Jiri Grönroos jiri.gronroos+l...@iki.fi. +Copyright: 2014 Lasse Liehu lasse.li...@gmail.com + 2013 Jiri Grönroos jiri.gronroos+l...@iki.fi. 2013 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@canonical.com 2006-2008 Ilkka Tuohela ituoh...@src.gnome.org 2004,2005 Tommi Vainikainen tvain...@src.gnome.org diff -Nru goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/series goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/series --- goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/series 2014-05-25 20:30:51.0 +0200 +++ goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/series 2014-11-15 16:49:00.0 +0100 @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ update_de.patch update_eu.patch update_id.patch +update_fi.patch diff -Nru goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/update_fi.patch goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/update_fi.patch --- goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/update_fi.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ goobox-3.3.1/debian/patches/update_fi.patch 2014-11-15 16:49:33.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,1181 @@ +Index: goobox-3.3.1-5/po/fi.po +=== +--- goobox-3.3.1-5.orig/po/fi.po goobox-3.3.1-5/po/fi.po +@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ msgstr + Project-Id-Version: goobox\n + Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?; + product=gooboxkeywords=I18N+L10Ncomponent=general\n +-POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-20 21:43+\n ++POT-Creation-Date: 2014-11-07 09:19+\n + PO-Revision-Date: 2013-09-15 18:51+0300\n + Last-Translator: Jiri Grönroos jiri.gronroos+l...@iki.fi\n + Language-Team: suomi gnome-fi-la...@lists.sourceforge.net\n +@@ -28,72 +28,29 @@ msgstr + Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n + X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.6\n + +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:165 +-#, c-format +-msgid File is not a valid .desktop file +-msgstr Tiedosto ei ole kelvollinen .desktop-tiedosto +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:190 +-#, c-format +-msgid Unrecognized desktop file Version '%s' +-msgstr Tunnistamaton desktop-tiedoston versio '%s' +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:970 +-#, c-format +-msgid Starting %s +-msgstr Käynnistetään %s +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:1112 +-#, c-format +-msgid Application does not accept documents on command line +-msgstr +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:1180 +-#, c-format +-msgid Unrecognized launch option: %d +-msgstr Tuntematon käynnistysvalinta: %d +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:1385 +-#, c-format +-msgid Can't pass documents to this desktop element +-msgstr +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggdesktopfile.c:1406 +-#, c-format +-msgid Not a launchable item +-msgstr Ei käynnistettävä kohde +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggsmclient.c:226 +-msgid Disable connection to session manager +-msgstr +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggsmclient.c:229 +-msgid Specify file containing saved configuration +-msgstr +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggsmclient.c:229 +-msgid FILE +-msgstr TIEDOSTO +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggsmclient.c:232 +-msgid Specify session management ID +-msgstr +- +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggsmclient.c:232 +-msgid ID +-msgstr ++#: ../data/appdata/goobox.appdata.xml.in.h:1 ++#, fuzzy ++#| msgid _About CD Player ++msgid Goobox CD Player ++msgstr _Tietoja - CD-soitin + +-#: ../copy-n-paste/eggsmclient.c:253 +-msgid Session management options: +-msgstr ++#: ../data/appdata/goobox.appdata.xml.in.h:2 ++#, fuzzy ++#| msgid Play CDs and save the tracks to disk as files ++msgid ++Goobox allows you to play CDs and save the tracks to disk as mp3, ogg, flac ++or wav files. ++msgstr Soita
Bug#720062: www.debian.org: http://release.debian.org/migration/ does not work / is not understandable
Hello Adam, On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:01:34AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: reassign 720062 release.debian.org retitle 720062 migration page output unclear user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 720062 + tools On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 07:11 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal debian-www don't maintain the pages you mentioned. The clue is that they're under release.debian.org. :-) Thanks. I was wondering for some time as well which package to report at. I maintain goobox. It had a release critical bug which I just downgraded because I cannot reproduce it and the submitter does not answer anymore on my questions. Now the version in sid should be able to migrate to testing. However, it is still blocked. The list of RC bugs that the BTS provides to britney for testing migration is updated four times a day - at 00:00, 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00 UTC. You downgraded the bug at 20:00, so when britney ran at 22:00 UTC she was unaware of the downgrading. The next britney run is in a few minutes time at which point the bug will no longer be a blocker. Thanks for your explanation. I assumed that it already happened and looking at that page made me believe it was another issue. Secondly, libcam-dev is in testing: http://packages.debian.org/jessie/libcam-dev Yes, but. The link in question is in a section headed Dependency analysis (including build-depends; i386 only):. libcam-dev _does not exist_ on i386: libcam-dev | 9.1+ds1-3 |testing | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 Dooh, of course. (I knew that when I was working on alpha ...) Thanks Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#680622: unblock: goobox/3.0.1-5, was Re: Bug#680622: unblock: goobox/3.0.1-4
Hello Philipp, On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:15:17AM -0600, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 02:45:43PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: However, the road was a little bumpy, thus 3.0.1-4 closes an RC bug (namely #679554). It has (finally) build on all architectures. | + # Due to bug #679554 / 679552 | +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),i386) | + docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.en.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/man1/goobox.1 | po4a -v -f debian/po4a.cfg | # po4a-translate is broken, c.f. #280882 | perl -i -p -e 's# refentrytitle\dhucpackage;#\dhucpackage;#ms' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml | perl -i -p -e 's#^\s*/refentrytitle##' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml | docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | recode latin1..utf8 debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | +else | + cp -iv debian/pregenerated/goobox.1 debian/goobox/usr/share/man/man1/goobox.1 | + cp -iv debian/pregenerated/goobox.1.de debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | +endif What kind of fix is that? If it builds on your machine use docbook-to-man, on the buildds use pregenerated stuff? Sorry, but no. As you said it's probably not goobox's fault so it needs to be fixed somewhere else. It turned out to be a dpkg issue (cf. #675613). Some buildds had a older dpkg (older than current wheezy, where this is fixed) and thus the build failed. I removed the above hack (i.e. the relevant rules file now reads again: docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.en.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/man1/goobox.1 po4a -v -f debian/po4a.cfg # po4a-translate is broken, c.f. #280882 perl -i -p -e 's# refentrytitle\dhucpackage;#\dhucpackage;#ms' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml perl -i -p -e 's#^\s*/refentrytitle##' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 recode latin1..utf8 debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 on all architectures. I uploaded this as goobox 3.0.1-5. After all buildds updated to a recent enough dpkg (i.e. the one from wheezy or sid) goobox built again without problems on all architectures. I attached the debdiff to the current version in Testing (i.e. debdiff goobox_3.0.1-1.dsc goobox_3.0.1-5.dsc) where I removed the language updates themselves. unblock goobox/3.0.1-5 Thanks Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ diff -Nru goobox-3.0.1/debian/changelog goobox-3.0.1/debian/changelog --- goobox-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-04-20 20:37:30.0 +0200 +++ goobox-3.0.1/debian/changelog 2012-07-08 11:28:48.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,51 @@ +goobox (3.0.1-5) unstable; urgency=high + + * Urgency high due to RC fix (3rd try) + * Build man pages again on all architectures. It looks like the build + failure (avoided in 3.0.1-4) was caused not by sp itself but rather by + dpkg (cf. dpkg bug #675613, closed in dpkg 1.16.4). + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Sun, 08 Jul 2012 11:22:30 +0200 + +goobox (3.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=high + + * Urgency high due to RC fix (2nd try) + * Until sp is fixed generate man pages only on build machine (currently i386 +chroot) and ship pregenerated ones otherwise. closes: #679554. + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:05:12 +0200 + +goobox (3.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=high + + * Urgency high due to RC fix + * Until sp is fixed on mipsel (see 679552), ship pregenerated translated +man pages for mipsel, closes: #679554. + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:46:19 +0200 + +goobox (3.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Revert broken NMU, closes: #679313. + * This reopens: #677246. Since no bug report until just before the release +happend, people requiring this fix will need to backport goobox after the +release of Wheezy. Sorry. + * po/fr.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + * help/es/es.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + * po/es.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + * po/pl.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + * po/sl.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. + + -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:35:53 +0200 + +goobox (3.0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Update to use libmusicbrainz5. Rework packaging to preserve +upstream configure and aclocal.m4 files during build process. +Closes: #677246. + + -- Jon Dowland j...@debian.org Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:42:47 +0100 + goobox (3.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru goobox-3.0.1/debian/copyright goobox
Bug#680622: unblock: goobox/3.0.1-4
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Severity: normal Please unblock package goobox Essentially 3.0.1-4 is 3.0.1-1 (from April 20th) with a few translation fixes applied. However, the road was a little bumpy, thus 3.0.1-4 closes an RC bug (namely #679554). It has (finally) build on all architectures. The long history: *) 3.0.1-1.1 was an NMU which did not work *) 3.0.2 reverted the NMU, updated a few translations and run into a FTBS on mipsel (679552). *) 3.0.3 avoided the FTBS by pregenerating the man pages on mipsl, however, the FTBS now appears on ia64 and amd64 as well *) 3.0.4 avoided those FTBS by pregenerating the man pages on all architectures except the uploading one. The full changelog of these versions (3.0.2 was before the freeze, but I include it nevertheless): goobox (3.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=high * Urgency high due to RC fix (2nd try) * Until sp is fixed generate man pages only on build machine (currently i386 chroot) and ship pregenerated ones otherwise. closes: #679554. -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:05:12 +0200 goobox (3.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=high * Urgency high due to RC fix * Until sp is fixed on mipsel (see 679552), ship pregenerated translated man pages for mipsel, closes: #679554. -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:46:19 +0200 goobox (3.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Revert broken NMU, closes: #679313. * This reopens: #677246. Since no bug report until just before the release happend, people requiring this fix will need to backport goobox after the release of Wheezy. Sorry. * po/fr.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. * help/es/es.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. * po/es.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. * po/pl.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. * po/sl.po updated from upstream git with msgcat. -- Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:35:53 +0200 unblock goobox/3.0.1-4 -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#680622: unblock: goobox/3.0.1-4
Hello Philipp, On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:15:17AM -0600, Philipp Kern wrote: On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 02:45:43PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: However, the road was a little bumpy, thus 3.0.1-4 closes an RC bug (namely #679554). It has (finally) build on all architectures. | + # Due to bug #679554 / 679552 | +ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),i386) | + docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.en.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/man1/goobox.1 | po4a -v -f debian/po4a.cfg | # po4a-translate is broken, c.f. #280882 | perl -i -p -e 's# refentrytitle\dhucpackage;#\dhucpackage;#ms' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml | perl -i -p -e 's#^\s*/refentrytitle##' $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml | docbook-to-man $(MANDIR)/goobox.de.sgml debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | recode latin1..utf8 debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | +else | + cp -iv debian/pregenerated/goobox.1 debian/goobox/usr/share/man/man1/goobox.1 | + cp -iv debian/pregenerated/goobox.1.de debian/goobox/usr/share/man/de/man1/goobox.1 | +endif What kind of fix is that? If it builds on your machine use docbook-to-man, on the buildds use pregenerated stuff? Sorry, but no. As you said it's probably not goobox's fault so it needs to be fixed somewhere else. That would be sp, where I reported this as #679552. Would this bug than be serious? (Though the last maintainer upload of sp happend in 2006). Unfortunately on my systems (testing amd64 and sid i386 chroot) this bug does not occure, making it hard for me to debug. Also please note that we are talking about (translated) man pages here, not about a FTBS in the code of the program itself. Thanks! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#680541: unblock: mutt/1.5.21-6.1
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: Tobias Quathamer to...@debian.org Please unblock package mutt The update is a (German) translation fixes and desktop file fixes update only: mutt (1.5.21-6.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. * (Mainly) L10n NMU targeting wheezy + German translation of desktop file (Closes: #658627) + Fixes when using the desktop file with dropped URL (Closes: #628240) + Fixes for syntax of desktop file (Closes: #639001) + Update de.po, reviewed by debian-l10n-german (Closes: #579967) and fix a typo in the compressed folder de.po translation It has been sucessfully build on all architectures already. unblock mutt/1.5.21-6.1 Thanks -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Please unblock wizznic 0.9.2-preview2+dfsg-1.1
Hello, my translation / desktop file NMU missed the freeze just by a couple of hours. The changes are: wizznic (0.9.2-preview2+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non maintainer upload * Fix typo in extended description. Closes: 637850 * Add German translation in desktop file. Closes: 640230 * Add Category Game in desktop file. Closes: 652616 * Provide infrastructure to i18n the man page. Closes: 640232 * Add german translation of man page. Closes: 640244 Thanks! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Are FTBS on mipsel release critical? (goobox #679554)
Hello, after a broken NMU I uploaded (before the freeze) essential the previous version with just some additional translations. For some strange reasons (the code in question has been built fine several times on all archs, including mipsel) the build now fails on mipsel (cf. #679554 and #679552). Looking at http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html I'm not sure if mipsel is a release architecture. If not, I could downgrade #679554 to important. Of course, hopefully the issue (maybe a temporary glitch?) could be fixed still in time for Wheezy. So, my question: Are FTBS on mipsel (alone) RC? Thanks! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
reopen 568141 thanks Hello Julien, On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 01:31:16AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 19:15:01 +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Recently a point release was shipped (being installed as I type). At the time of releasing (i.e. when apt saw it) no notice was available on www.debian.org to verify what was upgraded and the version. So don't upgrade until you get the announcement. Closing this bug. Please read the entire bug report before closing. Reading only the first paragraph might lead to jumping to wrong conclusions. (Also the discussion already progressed in the bug trail btw.). The next paragraph (which you deleted) reads: Now the News is up (News/2010/20100130.wml) and since it unfortunately as usual does not mention the new version of each software (which is done in every DSA) I as usual went to http://packages.debian.org/XXX for each package XXX to look for the latest version but to my suprise I saw the following: ... and then the bug report continues about inconsistencies between various version reports on Debian sites. So it is clearly not about a missing announcement and reading it (News/2010/20100130.wml) does not help (so in fact I even *did* get the announcement, though getting it is another issue one could discuss). Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
Hello Julien, On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's reasonable, the release process is complicated enough as it is. Please don't reopen. I'm not saying it is easy, I'm not saying that this is a must fix, I'm not saying someone is to blame, etc. But you are saying: This is a problem (bug) but I don't want to see a report about it? I belived that Debian is not hiding problems. And, the bts has a tag called wontfix to indicate a problem a fix cannot be found. I hope you can enlighten me why this problem should not be documented in the bts. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
Hello Luk, On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's reasonable, the release process is complicated enough as it is. Please don't reopen. I'm not saying it is easy, I'm not saying that this is a must fix, I'm not saying someone is to blame, etc. But you are saying: This is a problem (bug) but I don't want to see a report about it? I belived that Debian is not hiding problems. And, the bts has a tag called wontfix to indicate a problem a fix cannot be found. I hope you can enlighten me why this problem should not be documented in the bts. There currently are mails to inform people of upcoming point releases and mails to announce point releases when everything is available on the mirror network. What is it that you are still missing and what exactly can be done to get that fixed? It is currently not clear which pages are current and which pages are out of date regarding version numbers after point updates. A fix could be some note on e.g. http://packages.debian.org/ that the version numbers after point releases might be (slightly) out of date and that in case of doubt http://packages.qa.debian.org/ should be used. Another fix was proposed in my initial bug report (why is nobody reading this?) already: My suggestion: First update www.debian.org (*with* version numbers) and then push the update out to the mirrors. And secondly unify the versions given in http://packages.debian.org/XXX and http://packages.qa.debian.org/XXX (and in the latter also where the latest one is printed). Hope this clarifies. Do you agree to reopen this bug now? (After having explained the initial report again and having proposed two possible solutions) Thanks! Greetings Helge P.S. And of course, adding version numbers in the NEWS on www.debian.org, e.g. News/2010/20100130.wml, would also solve the immediate problem ... -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
reopen 568141 reassign 568141 www.debian.org retitle 568141 Syncing of version numbers after point release should be more explicit Hello Luk, On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 05:42:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: On 05/14/2011 05:13 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:43:55PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: On 05/14/2011 10:44 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: This is still about the fact that you're expecting all debian.org resources to be in sync at point release time. I don't think that's reasonable, the release process is complicated enough as it is. Please don't reopen. I'm not saying it is easy, I'm not saying that this is a must fix, I'm not saying someone is to blame, etc. But you are saying: This is a problem (bug) but I don't want to see a report about it? I belived that Debian is not hiding problems. And, the bts has a tag called wontfix to indicate a problem a fix cannot be found. I hope you can enlighten me why this problem should not be documented in the bts. There currently are mails to inform people of upcoming point releases and mails to announce point releases when everything is available on the mirror network. What is it that you are still missing and what exactly can be done to get that fixed? It is currently not clear which pages are current and which pages are out of date regarding version numbers after point updates. A fix could be some note on e.g. http://packages.debian.org/ that the version numbers after point releases might be (slightly) out of date and that in case of doubt http://packages.qa.debian.org/ should be used. This has nothing to do with release.debian.org, but with syncs the website and QA teams are responsible of AFAICT. So it would be sensible to reassign this to www.debian.org? Another fix was proposed in my initial bug report (why is nobody reading this?) already: My suggestion: First update www.debian.org (*with* version numbers) and then push the update out to the mirrors. And secondly unify the versions given in http://packages.debian.org/XXX and http://packages.qa.debian.org/XXX (and in the latter also where the latest one is printed). The website update should only happen once the mirrors are populated according to the mirror team which makes perfectly sense to me. Fine, a note along this could be put on the above mentioned pages as well. Hope this clarifies. Do you agree to reopen this bug now? (After having explained the initial report again and having proposed two possible solutions) I'm afraid you'll get nowhere by reopening the bug. The sync scripts for packages.debian.org and packages.qa.debian.org are suboptimal in that they show out-of-date information also when there is no point release. So that might be something to look at by the website and/or QA teams. Well, identifying a problem is the first step, even if no (immediate) fix is possible. So that's no reason not to reopen, even if this bug has to remain open for some time to come. And again, reassigning to the www.debian.org seems to make perfectly sense to me now. P.S. And of course, adding version numbers in the NEWS on www.debian.org, e.g. News/2010/20100130.wml, would also solve the immediate problem ... That might be possible, though would need some better integration of the tools (patches are probably welcome) and coordination with the press team that they are fine with the changes. Given that again this happens on the website, I will reopen this bug now and assign it to www.debian.org for their evaluation. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#605748: Intent to NMU or help for an l10n upload of grub2 to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs
Hello, On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:17:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 18:23:39 +, Colin Watson wrote: grub2 (1.98+20100804-10) unstable; urgency=low I've just unblocked this one, should go in in a couple of days, barring new RC bugs. So are those untranslated strings going to be translated now? Will there be a call for translations? Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#605813: Please unblock goobox 2.1.2-6 which resolves a FTBFS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal goobox 2.1.2-6 was accepted yesterday. This version resolves a FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd (and possibly others, I don't know why it only showed there). Thanks goes to Julien Cristau for solving the problem. This version has now been built on all release arches except mips (where it is still waiting for a buildd). Please unblock for Squeeze and adjust aging if needed (the previous version already had an unblock and would have migrated by now if the FTBFS hadn't appeared). Thanks Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Please reschedule goobox on kfreebsd-amd64
Hello, I added further translations to goobox seems to FTBFS an an already provided translation (fr.po), i.e. one which was already built earlier. I diffed the sucessfull earlier build and the failing new build but could not find anything. I also asked on the debian-bsd list but got no answer. I'm rather baffeled at this point. Could you please reschedule a rebuild of goobox on kfreebsd-amd64 to ensure the failure was not a temporary glitch? Thanks Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#604227: release.debian.org: Please unblock goobox
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal goobox 2.1.2-5 was just accepted. The changelog is as follows: * po/da.po updated from upstream git. * po/eu.po updated from upstream git. Please unblock for Squeeze. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Importance of partial upgrades
severity 588026 serious thanks On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 05:46:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Partial upgrades from one stable release to another are expected to work, unless there's a really good reason (of the kind which one would most likely expect to be mentioned somewhere prominent such as in the Release Notes). If installing the squeeze version of lvm2 on a lenny system leaves the system in an unbootable state then that would be an RC bug. Based on this I raise the severity. This could be argured, of course, since technically I could boot but looking but a) the upgrade was stuck and b) the failed update (in the boot loader!) is really scarry since the error message is so unclear that I really expected the boot to fail. I only found out that it worked because I was travelling (offline) and had to shut down the machine due to low battery. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#601130: release.debian.org: Please unblock (and possibly reduce aging for) goobox
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal goobox 2.1.2-4 was just accepted. It only adds a partial Slovenian help translation. Please accept it for Squeeze (and possible reduce the aging -- I was not sure if increasing the urgency was ok as technically this is only minor). -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Importance of partial upgrades
Hello, the partial upgrade of lvm breaks grub2 (cf. #588026), however this is not mentioned in the control file. I was bitten by this quite hard and reported it, according to my understanding of policy this is only important, however. I've seen no maintainer reaction on this issue, unfortunately, but before reconsidering the severity I would like to ask debian-release how you would rate this issue. Thanks! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#596226: release.debian.org: Please allow goobox 2.1.2-3 into Squeeze
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal I uploaded goobox 2.1.2-3 yesterday. It is purely a translation update: * po/fr.po updated from upstream git. Thanks -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug #555168: considering the pseudo-licences in locale files as non-free?
Hello Christian, On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 03:14:39PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: The mentions in the offending files mentioned in this bug report are very clearly copy and paste that was made without thinking by the people who did so. While this is most likely true (especially for those with a truncated license) I don't know if you can say so for sure. Maybe some of the authors liked the license[1]? In some (e.g. de_AT, ca_FR) I see a point of contact mentioned, probably finding their (unfortunately not given) e-mail adress and contacting them could resolve them quickly? Probably _POSIX served as an example? I think the author of this file should be the first contact. A very good example are the wo_SN, ca_AD, eu_FR (and maybe a few others), which I am the author of. So, yes, I am one of those people who didn't even imagine that people would consider locale files as somethign that could have a licence? Yes, at least in the EU collections (even if the individual entries are public knowledge) have a copyright so I thinks (IANAL) that a license is in order. It was definitely not my intent to give a licence to a collection of information that indeed belongs to the public domain. And, still, I blindly and carelessly copied information from another locale. I suggest putting a proper license on them for your entries, as »public domain« is not a universal concept but a license is. A simply BSD one should suffice, then. So, I wonder whether the following: # Distribution and use is free, also for # commercial purposes. should be considered a licence. So, really, considering this as RC for files where even the fact that a licence can apply to, is highly debatable. I therefore suggest that an exception is granted for squeeze to give time to fix this: Since some of them are rather old I think having some more time to fix this (i.e. beyond the release of Squeeze) would be appropriate. - either by rewriting the offending localeswhich would indeed be just copy and paste, as such information has, by definition, only one form First I would try to contact the original authors where possible. Maybe rewriting would then be unecessary. - or by relicensing them (which I'll do immediately for locales I wrote, putting them in the public domain). I'd suggest going for BSD or similar, see above. Release team, would you be OK to grant an exception for locales ad bug #555168? The alternative would of course be to downgrade this bug to severoty important (imho, it should be minor, even). I'd also ask for an exception. [1] This is especially true since several entries are from ISO (cf. de_AT, or especially POSIX) and here copyright is taken care of very carefully (at least usually). But maybe they simply did not think about modification - a mail to Keld Simonsen (he explicitly lists the ISO comittee, he might have the history and contact details of the other authors) should clarify that. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Recently a point release was shipped (being installed as I type). At the time of releasing (i.e. when apt saw it) no notice was available on www.debian.org to verify what was upgraded and the version. Now the News is up (News/2010/20100130.wml) and since it unfortunately as usual does not mention the new version of each software (which is done in every DSA) I as usual went to http://packages.debian.org/XXX for each package XXX to look for the latest version but to my suprise I saw the following: Package/Version shipped vs. http://packages.debian.org/ python-xml (0.8.4-10.1+lenny1) vs. 0.8.4-10.1 wireshark (1.0.2-3+lenny8) vs. 1.0.2-3+lenny7 xfs (1:1.0.8-2.2+lenny1) vs. 1:1.0.8-2.1 kazehakase (0.5.4-2.2+lenny1) vs. 0.5.4-2.2 base-files (5lenny5) vs. 5lenny4 ... Obviously different from previous updates this page is out of date. I was almost considering stopping the update when I checked http://packages.qa.debian.org/XXX instead (how am I to know that this page is correct???). Here for all packages fortunately the latest version was printed, but again confusingly. For example, for dhcp3 in column stable the latest version was given but not in the column stable-sec, while for wireshare it was reversed, i.e. the latest version was in stable-sec not stable column. Upgrading a system is a delicate process. Since there is no DSA I've to rely on www.debian.org that everything is ok. A very basic check is the version number. For this update it was *hard* to check it. My suggestion: First update www.debian.org (*with* version numbers) and then push the update out to the mirrors. And secondly unify the versions given in http://packages.debian.org/XXX and http://packages.qa.debian.org/XXX (and in the latter also where the latest one is printed). -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.27.10-grsec-cz03 Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#568141: release.debian.org: Latest point release hard to follow / confusing
Hello Philipp, On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 08:24:23PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Obviously different from previous updates this page is out of date. I was almost considering stopping the update when I checked http://packages.qa.debian.org/XXX instead (how am I to know that this page is correct???). What are you checking on upgrade? If it's for integrity: point releases are signed with an offline key in addition to the normal archive key. So you can check Release based on Release.gpg and there's then a defined trust path. Essentially it is a second check for integrity (call me paranoid, but I'd like to match the version apt-listchanges displays me to the one I obtained via a different path). It's also a delayed QA, once or twice I caught a typo in a DSA this way. I'm well aware about the trust path and the risks mitigated/involved in the signing process and do not question it. The mail to debian-announce[1] might not list the versions but it does list the changes introduced. And you should be able to find the concrete changelogs a) in the package through apt-listchanges and b) on packages.qa.d.o. Yes, I could compare the changes also, but this is more tedious than version numbers (e.g. for linux-2.6). And up to now the similar sounding site http://packages.debian.org also showed the latest version, which is not the case now. This time only packages.qa.d.o show the latest version, and then sometimes in the category stable and sometimes in stable-sec (I don't know if that was the case previously as well). I'm happy to adjust the process, however it's difficult to get all people involved present and awake for the whole timespan of a point release. (I.e. we started at about 19 UTC and finshed at 23:30 UTC. The mirror push was supposed to happened after the next dinstall at 01:52 UTC. Due to a glitch the actual sync only happened after the ftp-master was awake again at 9:30 UTC. And the press release came in even later, too. So not everything worked as expected on this one.) I'm not detailed in the process (thanks for the explanation) and I just made a suggestion in my intial mail about a possible improvement. So if this unfortunate incident happend because of one time glitches, no problem, but this still would not explain why http://packages.debian.org is outdated. So essentially there should be a canonical reliable way to obtain the version numbers. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian 5.0 (lenny) release notes: Call for translations, again
Hello Thomas, On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:22:32AM +0100, Thomas Mueller wrote: Is someone working on the de-translations? Yes. Need help? Yes. Please join the work on debian-l10n-german. In essence: a) Checkout the current version (see below, i.e. svn co svn://svn.debian.org/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes/) b) Tell us where you can help (on debian-l10-german), currently I think upgrading.po needs urgently help. After that[1] add to the translation (note that some other programms are cited, so check their German output) and send patches to debian-l10n-german - or - c) Proofread text and send patches to debian-l10n-german. We'll help you gladly along on debian-l10n-german for further questions (and in German). Am Samstag, 24. Januar 2009 schrieb W. Martin Borgert: de: 552 translated messages, 41 fuzzy translations, 147 untranslated See this mail from last october for technical details: http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2008/10/msg00134.html The SVN location of the release notes have changed since: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/trunk/release-notes The current draft version is published on: http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes Greetings Helge [1] To avoid double work, I think Holger was also working on this file. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Request for unfreeze of goobox 2.0.0-5: pure documentation/l10n
Hello Adeodato, On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:15:04PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: Unblocked. Thanks! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Request for unfreeze of goobox 2.0.0-5: pure documentation/l10n
Hello, during upgrade tests I noticed that a feature previously not working (--version output) now works in goobox (2.0.0-4 as present in testing). In this upload I only fixed the man page to mirror that, updated the German man page translation accordingly, updated a few programm translations from upstream SVN and added a colon in the last changelog entry to please linitian, i.e. this upload does not touch any code. The full changelog: goobox (2.0.0-5) unstable; urgency=low . * L10n documentation upload targetting Lenny * --version now displays the version, fix man page * Unfuzzy German man page translation * Update Basque translation from upstream SVN * Update Czech translation from upstream SVN * Add missing colon to please lintian This is a pure documentation/l10n upload and hence should be acceptable for an unfreeze. Could you allow 2.0.0-5 into Lenny once it built on all architectures? If you need more information do not hesitate to ask. Thanks A good start in 2009 Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Request for unfreeze of goobox: L10 (possibly + X)
Hello RMs, On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:27:38PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Helge Kreutzmann [Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:36:16 +0200]: Would the RMs accept an upload of -4 including the fix for #495492 (and, if possible, for #495491 as well) targetting Lenny? Yes. Thanks. I built, tested and uploaded 2.0.0-4 now. Please unfreeze this version to reach Lenny. Thanks! Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Request for unfreeze of goobox: L10 (possibly + X)
Hello, since the German translation for goobox contained an error, I corrected it (and pushed it upstream). Subsequently, I uploaded a new debian version (2.0.0-3) which has been built by most architectures already. The full changelog: goobox (2.0.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * L10n upload targetting Lenny * Update Arabic translation from upstream SVN * Update Czech translation from upstream SVN * Update German translation from upstream SVN * Update Brazilian translation from upstream SVN -- Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:57:04 +0200 This is a pure l10n upload an hence should be acceptable for an unfreeze. Unfortunately, just after uploading two bugs have been reported[1], which both are easy and non-intrusive to fix: #495492: Previous upstream versions were able to create mp3 if the necessary package (not in Debian) was present, this is no longer the case. The fix is simple: remove README.Debian and Recommends to gstreamer-lame. Since Lenny users might search for mp3 encoding removing this information might save them some time. This fix does not alter the built binary in any way. #495491: A certain sequence with the preference dialog makes goobox crash (I confirmed this on ppc). The patch has been accepted (slightly updated) by upstream and is attached to this e-mail. While having this fix in Lenny would be nice (and the fix does not alter much), I understand that it might not be acceptable. I confirmed that the fix builds and works on ppc, before upload I would check for building on x86 as well. Would the RMs accept an upload of -4 including the fix for #495492 (and, if possible, for #495491 as well) targetting Lenny? If this is not possible I request a freeze exception for -3. If you need more information do not hesitate to ask. Greetings Helge [1] These were the first bugs for almost the entire development cycle for Lenny -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ # Fix crash in properties dialog for wav files, taken from upstream SVN # Closes: #495491 Index: goobox-2.0.0-3test/src/dlg-preferences.c === --- goobox-2.0.0-3test.orig/src/dlg-preferences.c 2008-08-18 19:22:46.0 +0200 +++ goobox-2.0.0-3test/src/dlg-preferences.c 2008-08-18 19:26:35.0 +0200 @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ } gtk_combo_box_set_active (GTK_COMBO_BOX (data-p_filetype_combobox), file_format); - gtk_notebook_set_current_page (GTK_NOTEBOOK (data-p_encoding_notebook), file_format); + filetype_combobox_changed_cb (NULL, data); /**/ @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ text = g_strdup_printf (bigb%s/b/big, _(FLAC)); break; default: - text = ; + text = g_strdup (); break; } gtk_label_set_markup (GTK_LABEL (f_title_label), text); @@ -597,6 +597,7 @@ text = _(Compression level:); break; default: + text = ; break; } gtk_label_set_text (GTK_LABEL (data-f_quality_label), text); @@ -612,6 +613,7 @@ text = _(WAV+PCM is a lossless format that holds uncompressed, raw pulse-code modulated (PCM) audio.); break; default: + text = ; break; } gtk_label_set_text (GTK_LABEL (f_description_label), text); Index: goobox-2.0.0-3test/src/dlg-ripper.c === --- goobox-2.0.0-3test.orig/src/dlg-ripper.c 2008-08-18 19:24:21.0 +0200 +++ goobox-2.0.0-3test/src/dlg-ripper.c 2008-08-18 19:26:35.0 +0200 @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ char *url= NULL; scheme = gnome_vfs_get_uri_scheme (folder); - if ((scheme == NULL) || (scheme == )) + if ((scheme == NULL) || (strcmp (scheme, ) == 0)) url = gnome_vfs_get_uri_from_local_path (folder); else url = g_strdup (folder); signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny
Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not see why making the old stack available again, but blacklisted by default, discourages testing of the newer stack. If you have both available, then yes, users can switch to the new stack more easily, but at least they will still be using Debian kernel packages, and they can switch back to the juju stack just as well. If you do not make this option available, those who have problems with the new stack will have to compile their own kernels, and then they will not track the Debian kernel packages anymore. Unfortunately there *are* serious security problems with the old stack, but as Guus said, not providing the old stack does not help at all, because right now people will only be annoyed (and seriously annyoed if they discover that the installer regressed (no installation over firewire possible any more!) without notice!). So IMHO provide the new stack by default and add a big notice somewhere like: *Some drivers (e.g. eth1394) do not yet work with the firewire stack enabled by default. For security and performance reasons we strongly recommend to use the drivers provided by default. But if the driver happens to be unusuable, then a) Report this as a bug and b) Do x, y and z to reenable the old driver This way people can use Debian kernels, will provide feedback and improve the situation. Otherwise (like I did, cf. #450836) those people will not test the kernels (and probably will not benefit and test updates regularly either). Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta1: Status Update 1
Otavio Salvador wrote: Kernel status = * linux-modules-di-m68k-2.6 isn't uploaded due the lack of loop-aes and squashfs since linux-headers lack modules.lds files (#402061). * Installation over firewire is currently not possible (#450836) Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Please unblock noffle
Hello, I did the German Debconf update. The update was uploaded and at the same time the package was orphaned. The 10 day period for a low upload is now over. I checked the version history and it contains mostly debconf updates (respective to the version currently in Etch): Czech, French, Japanese, German. The only other change looks like a minor fix to me: #408187. I CC'ed the former maintainer in the hope that he might comment if he believes that #408187 is suitable for Etch. If possible, the latest version of noffle should then be unblocked so that all translations (which are excempt from the freeze) can reach Etch. Disclaimer: I've never used noffle, just translated the debconf template. Thanks Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Fwd: goobox REMOVED from testing
Hello, On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:27:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Helge Kreutzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060702 12:42]: goobox was in the way of getting gnome-media, libsexy, xine, ... updated. I will check how the package can go in again after we finished that transition (which might be any time now, as we have most blockers moved apart). Ok, I assumed something like this. Is there any activity expected from the maintainers at this point or do Bin-NMUs need to be scheduled (please do so in this case)? I'm not so sure, if I think activity is necessary I'll submit an appropriate bug report. That's great. I'll be offline for about a week, but afterwards I can prepare a new version if necessary (looking at the console messages, updating to latest standards and similar house keeping work) which I had put off until next upstream release (which IMHO has not happend so far). well, some housekeeping is never wrong. :) Nope, but I just put off an upload for cosmetic housekeeping only. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Proper Tag for failure on one arch? was: Re: Bug#279662: zapping: Zapping (on alpha) not releasable
Hello Christian, On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 03:35:43PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: This is exactly 244011, but I cannot reopen it. It is indeed fixed in unstable, but a new version has not yet propagated to Sarge (I have been busy writing my thesis, hence this late action). Since the current version in Sarge is broken, it either needs to be No, false. This version is broken for only one arch alpha and thus the grave severity should be downgraded to important. Sorry, I forgot to mention the alpha part. I tried to reopen the old one, but it did not work. I CC:'ed Debian-release, because I assumed that all architectures were treated equally and hence the critically (and the Sarge tag) were correct. removed (which is possible as there are other working TV apps available) or needs to be updated to the version in testing. Do you think you are spending your time for nothing ? Try to move this package in testing instead of filing a bug report asking to remove this package. Well, I assumed it'll move into testing. Reading other rc bug reports, I noticed that they were always re-openend and tagged sarge to notice that the migration is still due. Sorry if I am in error on the usage of the Sarge tag. Greetings Helge -- Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.freepatents.org/ pgpWjOjBr4lDA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Please let current aboot(-cross|-base) enter Sarge
Hello, please let aboot 0.9b-3 propagate to Sarge. The changes are almost completely documentation changes (e.g., translations which I really like to see in Sarge and added a missing man page). The following code changes have happenend: *)Endian-Fix for Isomarkboot *)Very small code fixes to get aboot compile with gcc 3.4, partially also in TESTING code not normally build. *)netabootwrap now outputs own name instead of bootp. Full changelog below, if more details needed please tell. Thanks! Helge P.S. Please CC: me as I am not subscribed. Changes: aboot (0.9b-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Synced man pages with upstream: aboot.conf.sgml, aboot.sgml, abootconf.sgml, e2writeboot.8, isomarkboot.sgml, sdisklabel.sgml, swriteboot.8. * Took german translation of man pages from upstream. * Minor code issues synced from upstream CVS (partially for testing builds). Closes: #258594. * Include patch to make isomarkboot endian-safe. Thanks to Steve McIntyre, Closes: #253846. * Add netabootwrap man page (english and german). * Fix netabootwrap so that it stops claiming to be bootp. -- Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.freepatents.org/ pgpbjDwFFueGO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Apology to german users required in the release notes
Hello, the release notes need to contain a note to users using the german locale along the lines: The Debian Project apologies for the unfortunate german quoting on the command line interface. A solution is worked on, but unfortunately hasn't made it into Sarge. As a workaround, switching to a UTF-8 based locale will avoid the problem. Rational: The current quoting for german locales (german, swiss, austrian, ...) tries to mimic proper german quoting (if UTF-8 is not present) and fails miserably: Opening quotes: ,, Closing quotes: The opening quotes use 2 characters, are visually clearly different from the closing quotes and users are confused because they read the opening quotes as two commas and not opening quote. Consider [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratch/incoming/MO/jan02$ /bin/mv -iv bla ~ ,,bla - ,,/home/helge/bla ,,bla entfernt Bugs have been filled on this issue quite a while back ([1], [2]). The entire list [3] has expressed that the this behaviour is highly undesirable. Essentially two solutions have been proposed, and intensivly discussed[4]: A) Using the same quotes as in english, i.e., B) Using inversed french quotes »« The vast majority (c.f. the thread starting at [4]) believes that either solution is much better than the current state. However, the glibc-maintainers expressed concernes about diverging from upstream and pointed out that the bugs where minor and (implicitly) should be fixed at some later stage. Hence the appology is needed, since -- given Debians history -- users of stable employing a german locale will experience the (unambiguously perceived as ugly) quotes for the years to come. The (almost) complete discussion is archived both in various threads on debian-l10n-german and in the bug reports [1] and [2]. Please CC: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release. Greetings Helge [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=228486 [2} http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=235759 [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2004/07/msg00172.html [4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2004/07/msg00149.html -- Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferredgpg-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.freepatents.org/ pgp80vNqsosvR.pgp Description: PGP signature
