Bug#987013: Release goal proposal: Remove Berkeley DB
Hi, On 15.04.21 18:12, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Hi > > I would like to propose a release goal: > > Remove Berkeley DB (finally) > > Berkeley DB was relicensed to AGPLv3 almost eight years ago. Since > then, Debian stayed with the last version before the license change. > The license change means, we can't take upstream patches, so security > support is only provided by other distributions with in the same state. > > After this time we really should try to get rid of this package, which > even is NMU maintained since three years. > > Affected source packages to remove: > - db-defaults > - db5.3 I second this proposal. Best regards, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Technischer Leiter Betrieb Tel.: +49 2166 9901-0 Fax:+49 2166 9901-100 E-Mail: martin.zobel-he...@credativ.de pgp fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B http://www.credativ.de credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080 USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209 Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Sascha Heuer Unser Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten unterliegt folgenden Bestimmungen: https://www.credativ.de/datenschutz OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: referencing cloud images in bullseye release notes
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 02:01:04PM -0800, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > We should be publishing release images for OpenStack and at least two > commercial cloud services approximately simultaneously with the bullseye > release. I'd like to include a short notice about cloud image > availability in the release notes, but it's not entirely clear where it > should go. I would also like to point to https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2018/10/msg00083.html It would make sense to discuss and publish a timeline in near future. Best regards, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Re: Upcoming stable point release (9.7)
Hi, On Wed Jan 23, 2019 at 19:48:28 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > The next point release for "stretch" (9.7) is in progress just now and > should hit the mirrors in the next hours. FTR, this point release will only contain apt and base-files so we can build new installation images with the apt released security.d.o yesterday. Regards, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Upcoming stable point release (9.7)
Hi, The next point release for "stretch" (9.7) is in progress just now and should hit the mirrors in the next hours. Regards, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#879629: upload to stretch-updates?
Hi, tbh, for me this would even warrant a upload to stretch-updates. Anyone from the release team disagree? Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#878685: stretch-pu: package udftools/1.3-2
Hi, On Sun Oct 15, 2017 at 21:58:16 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > diff -Nru udftools-1.3/debian/changelog udftools-1.3/debian/changelog > --- udftools-1.3/debian/changelog 2017-01-24 00:28:05.0 +0100 > +++ udftools-1.3/debian/changelog 2017-10-03 21:41:57.0 +0200 > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +udftools (1.3-2) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * Fix path to pktsetup in udftools init script > + > + -- Pali Rohár Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:41:57 +0200 > + > udftools (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low > >* New upstream release > diff -Nru udftools-1.3/debian/udftools.init udftools-1.3/debian/udftools.init > --- udftools-1.3/debian/udftools.init 2017-01-24 00:26:46.0 +0100 > +++ udftools-1.3/debian/udftools.init 2017-10-03 21:40:26.0 +0200 > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ > > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin > DESC="udftools packet writing" > -PKTSETUP=/usr/bin/pktsetup > +PKTSETUP=/usr/sbin/pktsetup > DEFAULTFILE=/etc/default/udftools > DEVICES="" > NEWINTNAMES="0 1 2 3" LGTM, beside that for the upload to stable you want a different version number and suite changed. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#874580: stretch-pu: package waagent/2.2.14-1~deb9u1
Yes Am 25. September 2017 22:35:33 MESZ schrieb "Adam D. Barratt" : >On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 13:27 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> > > (Also, we prefer if the full diff is included in pu bugs >> > > directly.) >> > >> > README.md | 39 ++- >> > azurelinuxagent/agent.py | 52 ++- >> > >... >> > 119 files changed, 5634 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-) >> >> >> Find attached the full diff gzip'd. > >Thanks. > >That appears to be missing a changelog stanza for the stable upload. Is >that the only proposed difference from the 2.2.14-1 unstable upload? > >Regards, > >Adam -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Bug#874580: stretch-pu: package waagent/2.2.14-1~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Hi, On Sat Sep 09, 2017 at 17:23:24 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 16:10:48 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > The Azure agent provides the provisioning part of the Microsoft Azure > > platform. > > It is necessary to tell the platform about the state of the systems. > > Therefor > > it is part of the "hardware" support for the Azure platform. > > > > Recent versions of the agent add support for a new revision of the platform > > called Azure Stack. In a nutshell, Azure Stack is Azure in a box for your > > home > > (Azure on Premise). Without this update, Debian can't be used on this new > > platform. The package itself is only useful on images within the Azure > > plattform and thus this upload will only affect users within Azure. > > > Do any of the changes affect the pre-existing Azure platforms? What's > the regression potential for those users? yes, this upload already affects pre-existing Azure platforms. I see the chance for regressions quite low as Microsoft tests for regression with their test suites. Also in case we really run into problems, Azure users can also contact Microsoft Azure support (which is actually the first thing that Microsoft advises anyway). Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#874580: stretch-pu: package waagent/2.2.14-1~deb9u1
es | 2 +-
> debian/patches/user-shell.patch| 6 +-
> debian/rules | 2 +
> debian/share/apt-setup | 21 ++
> debian/waagent.install | 1 +
> debian/waagent.waagent-apt.service | 13 +
> init/arch/waagent.service | 16 +
> init/gaia/waagent | 56 +++
> init/openbsd/waagent | 10 +
> makepkg.py | 11 +-
> setup.py | 20 +-
> tests/common/osutil/test_bigip.py | 29 --
> tests/common/osutil/test_default.py| 230
> tests/common/test_conf.py | 61
> tests/common/test_event.py | 157 +
> tests/common/test_logger.py| 66
> tests/common/test_version.py | 52 +--
> tests/daemon/test_daemon.py| 28 +-
> tests/data/events/1478123456789000.tld | 1 +
> tests/data/events/1478123456789001.tld | 1 +
> tests/data/events/1479766858966718.tld | 1 +
> .../ext/{sample_ext.zip => sample_ext-1.2.0.zip} | Bin
> .../HandlerManifest.json | 0
> .../ext/{sample_ext => sample_ext-1.2.0}/sample.py | 0
> tests/data/ga/WALinuxAgent-2.2.0.zip | Bin 357277 -> 0 bytes
> tests/data/ga/WALinuxAgent-2.2.11.zip | Bin 0 -> 450878 bytes
> tests/data/ga/supported.json | 8 +
> tests/data/metadata/vmagent_manifest1.json | 20 ++
> tests/data/metadata/vmagent_manifest2.json | 20 ++
> tests/data/metadata/vmagent_manifests.json | 7 +
> .../data/metadata/vmagent_manifests_invalid1.json | 10 +
> .../data/metadata/vmagent_manifests_invalid2.json | 10 +
> tests/data/test_waagent.conf | 111 ++
> tests/distro/test_resourceDisk.py | 1 +
> tests/ga/test_extension.py | 105 ++
> tests/ga/test_monitor.py | 50 ++-
> tests/ga/test_update.py| 367
> tests/pa/test_deprovision.py | 138 +++-
> tests/pa/test_provision.py | 61 +++-
> tests/protocol/mockwiredata.py | 2 +-
> tests/protocol/test_hostplugin.py | 385
> +
> tests/protocol/test_metadata.py| 124 ++-
> tests/protocol/test_wire.py| 124 ++-
> tests/test_agent.py| 92 +++++
> tests/tools.py | 4 -
> tests/utils/test_file_util.py | 100 +-
> tests/utils/test_passwords.txt | 4 +
> tests/utils/test_text_util.py | 12 +-
> 119 files changed, 5634 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-)
Find attached the full diff gzip'd.
--
Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster
http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster
GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
wala.patch.gz
Description: application/gzip
Bug#874580: stretch-pu: package waagent/2.2.14-1~deb9u1
Hi Bastian, On Thu Sep 07, 2017 at 16:10:48 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index 2954cfd..1cf1816 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,30 @@ > +waagent (2.2.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium > + > + * New upstream version. > + > + -- Bastian Blank Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:38:17 +0200 The suite and the version number look wrong, and differ to the version number in the subject. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#874350: stretch-pu: package mate-power-manager/1.16.2-1+deb9u1
tags 874350 + moreinfo Hi, > diff -Nru mate-power-manager-1.16.2/debian/changelog > mate-power-manager-1.16.2/debian/changelog > --- mate-power-manager-1.16.2/debian/changelog2017-04-26 > 21:37:51.0 +0200 > +++ mate-power-manager-1.16.2/debian/changelog2017-09-05 > 11:38:30.0 +0200 > @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ > +mate-power-manager (1.16.2-1+deb9u1) unstable; urgency=medium > + > + [ Martin Wimpress ] > + * debian/patches: > ++ Add 0001_do_not_abort_on_unknown_DBus_signal_name.patch. (Closes: > + #870121). > + > + -- Mike Gabriel Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:38:30 +0200 > + > mate-power-manager (1.16.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium > >* New upstream release. wrong distribution (unstable) in changelog entry. -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872442: jessie-pu: package gsoap/2.8.17-1+deb8u1
Hi, On Thu Aug 24, 2017 at 15:51:30 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > fre 2017-08-18 klockan 13:47 +0200 skrev Mattias Ellert: > > > > > No. You want to open a bug report against your own package, telling > > > there is a security bug. and you want to refer that on in the closes > > > statement. > > > > > > > This contradicts what Adam said in bug #872441: > > > > > If there is no bug filed against gsoap that relates to the issue, then > > > there should be no bug closed in the changelog. > > > > Can you resolve your differences? > > > > Mattias > > Hi again. > > Is there a resolution to this? Is a Closes statement mandatory or not? Adam has the last word on this. If he says it is okay, that is fine with me. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#873054: jessie-pu: package dns-root-data/2017072601~deb8u1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu Aug 24, 2017 at 08:03:54 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Dear release team, > > this is the dns-root-data update for DNSSEC Root Zone KSK-2017 (key tag > 20326), that's needed for the packages that rely on dns-root-data for > bootstrapping DNSSEC Trust Anchors. > > The root.hints has been updated to 2017072601 which should be update > as well. I don't think the /usr/share/dns/root.hints is used anywhere > in Debian, so it should be safe update. > > There will be another update after the former KSK has been removed from > trust anchors (around January 2018 or maybe even earlier when the former > KSK is removed from the RZ). > > It was suggested in a discussion with a security team that this should > fasttrack via jessie-updates. please provide a debdiff of the proposed source package, built and tested on oldstable, so that it can be confirmed. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#873053: stretch-pu: package dns-root-data/2017072601~deb9u1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu Aug 24, 2017 at 08:00:36 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Dear release team, > > this is the dns-root-data update for DNSSEC Root Zone KSK-2017 (key tag > 20326), that's needed for the packages that rely on dns-root-data for > bootstrapping DNSSEC Trust Anchors. > > The root.hints has been updated to 2017072601 which should be update > as well. I don't think the /usr/share/dns/root.hints is used anywhere > in Debian, so it should be safe update. > > There will be another update after the former KSK has been removed from > trust anchors (around January 2018 or maybe even earlier when the former > KSK is removed from the RZ). > > It was suggested in a discussion with a security team that this should > fasttrack via stretch-updates. please provide a debdiff of the proposed source package, built and tested on stable, so that it can be confirmed. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872991: stretch-pu: package lava-tool/0.21-1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, On Wed Aug 23, 2017 at 12:32:39 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > diff -Nru lava-tool-0.21/debian/changelog lava-tool-0.21/debian/changelog > --- lava-tool-0.21/debian/changelog 2017-01-19 15:46:04.0 + > +++ lava-tool-0.21/debian/changelog 2017-08-23 11:55:21.0 +0100 > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +lava-tool (0.21-1+deb9u1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=medium > + > + * Add missing dependency: python-simplejson. (Closes: #872782) > + > + -- Neil Williams Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:55:21 +0100 > + > lava-tool (0.21-1) unstable; urgency=medium > >* New upstream release i think you want 's/stable-proposed-updates/stretch/' in your debian/changelog. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872953: stretch-pu: package at-spi2-core/2.22.0-6
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, On Tue Aug 22, 2017 at 22:43:25 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Hello, > > Blind users have reported that their screen reader, Orca, would > sometimes crash when switching from window to window (Bug#872912), > affecting both stable and testing. Upstream released a fix, which was > confirmed by Bug#872912 tester to completely fix the issue in sid. I > would thus like to upload the fix to stable, as attached diff shows. The patch as is looks fine to me (beside you seem to time-travel a bit in your debian/changelog entry) but i would like to see a bit more testing in unstable. Both bugreport and the fix into unstable are from today. Thus, tagging moreinfo for now. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#870513: stretch-pu: package cloud-init/0.7.9-2
Hi Thomas, On Sun Aug 06, 2017 at 18:12:56 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:45:57PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > diff -Nru cloud-init-0.7.9/debian/cloud-init.NEWS > > cloud-init-0.7.9/debian/cloud-init.NEWS > > --- cloud-init-0.7.9/debian/cloud-init.NEWS 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 > > +0100 > > +++ cloud-init-0.7.9/debian/cloud-init.NEWS 2017-08-02 20:28:11.0 > > +0200 > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > > +cloud-init default behavior from upstream is to manage sources.list for > > Debian, > > +adding contrib and non-free by default. This is clearly a bug which we have > > +fixed. If you need contrib and non-free on your computer running > > cloud-init, > > +then please use /etc/apt/sources.list.d facility, instead of the general > > file > > +in /etc/apt/sources.list, as we changed the behavior. Our appologies for > > this > > +change. > > + > > + -- Thomas Goirand Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:28:11 +0200 > > Is NEWS the appropriate place for this, or would README or the changelog be > better? As it will only be shown when upgrading existing systems, this will > simply be noise (those systems will already have a sources.list). did you see this comment from Jonathan? Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872928: stretch-pu: package dnsdist/1.1.0-2+deb9u1
Hi, On Tue Aug 22, 2017 at 15:11:33 +, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Hi, > > this update fixes low-severity CVEs CVE-2016-7069, CVE-2017-7557, > purely based on version-targetted patches from upstream. these patches look good and are pretty small, a fixed version is already also in unstable. A stable release manager will most probably ACK that. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872818: stretch-pu: package cvxopt/1.1.4-1.5+deb9u1
Hi, On Mon Aug 21, 2017 at 17:07:39 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Dear Release Team, > > I would like to do a p-u for cvxopt, fixing bug #859579. > > By the time of the stretch release, cvxopt was not compatible with the new API > of the GLPK library, so a compatibility layer had been introduced through > glpk-4.49.diff. But that patch had too much in it, it contained an unneeded > compatibility function (lpx_main) that was using a missing symbol (glp_main) > (and this missing symbol had not been detected at compile time, because it is > in a dynamically-loaded shared object). this patch looks good and small, a fixed version is already also in unstable. A stable release manager will most probably ACK that. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872776: stretch-pu: package unknown-horizons/2017.1+ds-2
Hi, On Mon Aug 21, 2017 at 09:27:33 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > This is part 2 to address a memory leak in unknown-horizons. I have > just filed another bug report for the game engine called fife. > > This issue is also known as #871037 [1]. Please find attached the > debdiff for unknown-horizons. If i read the bug version information correctly, this fix wants to enter unstable first? Beside that, the patch looks good to me. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872442: jessie-pu: package gsoap/2.8.17-1+deb8u1
Hi, On Fri Aug 18, 2017 at 11:35:21 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > tor 2017-08-17 klockan 20:21 +0200 skrev Martin Zobel-Helas: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu Aug 17, 2017 at 16:38:30 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > Tags: jessie > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: pu > > > > > > This is a proposal to fix CVE-2017-9765 in jessie. > > > debdiff is attached. > > > > > > Mattias Ellert > > > diff -Nru gsoap-2.8.17/debian/changelog gsoap-2.8.17/debian/changelog > > > --- gsoap-2.8.17/debian/changelog 2014-07-11 13:45:59.0 +0200 > > > +++ gsoap-2.8.17/debian/changelog 2017-08-16 11:30:40.0 +0200 > > > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > > > +gsoap (2.8.17-1+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium > > > + > > > + * Fix for CVE-2017-9765 (Closes: ) > > > + > > > + -- Mattias Ellert Wed, 16 Aug 2017 > > > 11:30:40 +0200 > > > + > > > gsoap (2.8.17-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > once this changelog has a proper Closes line with bug-number this patch > > looks sane to me. > > > > Cheers, > > Martin > > (former stable release manager) > > > > Closes statement removed as requested. > See bug #872441 for the discussion. No. You want to open a bug report against your own package, telling there is a security bug. and you want to refer that on in the closes statement. -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872441: stretch-pu: package gsoap/2.8.35-4+deb9u1
Hi, On Fri Aug 18, 2017 at 09:01:04 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > tor 2017-08-17 klockan 21:59 +0100 skrev Adam D. Barratt: > > On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 20:22 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu Aug 17, 2017 at 16:38:36 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > +gsoap (2.8.35-4+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium > > > > + > > > > + * Fix for CVE-2017-9765 (Closes: ) > > > > + > > > > + -- Mattias Ellert Wed, 16 Aug 2017 > > > > 11:58:11 +0200 > > > > + > > > > gsoap (2.8.35-4) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > > > once this changelog has a proper Closes line with bug-number this patch > > > looks sane to me. > > > > Is there actually a Debian bug for the issue? I couldn't find one. > > > > Regards, > > > > Adam > > > > Hi! > > I don't understand the last comment here. > Of course there is a bug - it is this one. > > The reason the debdiff in the request says "Closes: ", is a > chicken-and-egg problem. You are supposed to attach the debdiff to the > request, but before you make the request its BTS number does not yet > exists - so you can't include it in the attachment at creation time. > After I got the confirmation back with the number I updated the > changelog with the bug number. No, this is the bug report für the p-u upload. What the release team is looking for is a (RC) bug assigned to the package, that describes the real issue, linking the CVEs, ... Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872441: stretch-pu: package gsoap/2.8.35-4+deb9u1
Hi, On Thu Aug 17, 2017 at 16:38:36 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > This is a proposal to fix CVE-2017-9765 in stretch. > debdiff is attached. > > Mattias Ellert > diff -Nru gsoap-2.8.35/debian/changelog gsoap-2.8.35/debian/changelog > --- gsoap-2.8.35/debian/changelog 2016-12-06 09:32:36.0 +0100 > +++ gsoap-2.8.35/debian/changelog 2017-08-16 11:58:11.0 +0200 > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +gsoap (2.8.35-4+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium > + > + * Fix for CVE-2017-9765 (Closes: ) > + > + -- Mattias Ellert Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:58:11 > +0200 > + > gsoap (2.8.35-4) unstable; urgency=medium once this changelog has a proper Closes line with bug-number this patch looks sane to me. Cheers, Martin (former stable release manager) -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#872442: jessie-pu: package gsoap/2.8.17-1+deb8u1
Hi, On Thu Aug 17, 2017 at 16:38:30 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: jessie > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > This is a proposal to fix CVE-2017-9765 in jessie. > debdiff is attached. > > Mattias Ellert > diff -Nru gsoap-2.8.17/debian/changelog gsoap-2.8.17/debian/changelog > --- gsoap-2.8.17/debian/changelog 2014-07-11 13:45:59.0 +0200 > +++ gsoap-2.8.17/debian/changelog 2017-08-16 11:30:40.0 +0200 > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +gsoap (2.8.17-1+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium > + > + * Fix for CVE-2017-9765 (Closes: ) > + > + -- Mattias Ellert Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:30:40 > +0200 > + > gsoap (2.8.17-1) unstable; urgency=medium once this changelog has a proper Closes line with bug-number this patch looks sane to me. Cheers, Martin (former stable release manager) -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#868756: stretch-pu: package ntp/1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u1 (pre-pre-approval)
Hi, from my perspective this patch looks sane. Cheers, Martin (former stable release manager) -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Re: [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Stretch
Hi, On Mon Oct 03, 2016 at 22:02:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > Slightly overdue, we have created a survey for the Stretch artwork. > > Please cast your vote at: > * > https://surveys.larjona.net/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=926823&lang=en_us > * Please be nice and vote only once! Did anyone actually tested the artworks against color vision deficiencies? With a quick look (using Chrome Spectrum plugin) at least two of the proposals look highly problematic to me. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release
Hi Steve, On Mon Jul 04, 2016 at 14:01:03 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners > of very recent amd64 machines too, with better support for things on > the Skylake platform. Those are the only two architectures I'm > thinking of supporting at this point. > > Is anybody else interested in helping? Thoughts/comments? from a cloud image users perspective this sounds like a great idea. There are several things eg. in the kernel with 10GE network drivers, where a newer kernel would definitivly help a lot. Also maybe newer cloud-init and friends would help. Please go for it. +1 from my side. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B
Bug#800006: jessie-pu: package isc-dhcp/4.3.1-6
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, i wonder if #795227 warrants an upload to jessie-pu (and maybe also to wheezy-pu) to be fixed with the next point release. We run into that issue at work, when we want to effectivly publish static IP addresses in cloud environments. Cheers, Martin -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#736168: pu: package samhain/2.8.3a-1
Hi, On Mon Jan 20, 2014 at 20:57:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo > > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 18:06 +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > I have recently updated Samhain in sid and have fixed some important bugs. > > As > > requested by DSA, since samhain is used in many project machines, I would > > like > > to make an upload to the wheezy release including some of these fixes. > > Not that it's a blocker, but do you know if they're planning on testing > the package once it's uploaded, before the point release? Once i see the package in p-u, i am willing to install it on some project machines, so we can test it. It might take until the weekend, though. Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140120212722.gd20...@ftbfs.de
Re: Bits from the release team (freeze time line)
Hi, On Sat Dec 28, 2013 at 19:51:21 +, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:14:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 03:28:04PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > However, using words like "known-buggy mips* machines" is just FUD > > > > against the mips*-ports, and plainly inacceptable, so please stop > > > > doing that. (For reference, there is no mipsel machine which has > > > > hardware bugs affecting daily operations. There are two mips machines > > > > which are pre-series and are not as stable as I wish, but as builddadm > > > > I was more occupied recently with arm* machines not stable then with > > > > mips machines not stable. This all doesn't mean I think nothing should > > > > be changed, but please do not FUD against mips* (or any other > > > > architecture).) > > > > > > builddadm does not keep the machines running, DSA does. ball is ancient, > > > > I agree that ball, rem and mayer are indeed ancient. That said despite > > their age, they are about twice faster as armel and armhf build daemons > > for building for example libreoffice or qt4-x11. Does they cause any > > problem from the administration point of view? > > The mipsel machines are working reliably but are probably not replacable if > one > dies. They could use more memory and it'd be helpful if they booted from SATA > (so that we can source new disks if/when the current PATA disks die). also, ball and rem currently sit in a a 4U case, which occupies (together with wiggum.debconf.org) 1/3 of the full rack we have at man-da. If we could get better boxes (or replace the machines at all), that would be nice. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131228200013.gb3...@ftbfs.de
DSA concerns for jessie architectures
[please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port specific list when replying.] Comrades! At our recent Essen sprint, DSA went through the release qualification matrix (for wheezy, as there isn't one for jessie, yet) and defined a set of requirements that we consider necessary for us to support a port for the next stable release. We have limited these requirements to whether DSA can support a port well or not, and we wanted to establish these requirements early in the release cycle so that our concerns can be addressed. Our requirements for machines are not new; they are: * reliability - The stable release manager requires that we operate three machines for each port: two buildd machines in different locations and one porter machine. These machines must be reliable (see mips for counterexample). * out of band management - We require the ability to manage the machines independently of their primary network interface: serial console or better, remotely-controllable power. * supportability - We require that the machines be commercialy available (within financial constraints) and that they be supportable through a warranty or post-warranty support or are otherwise easy to replace. * stability - We require that the machine's architecture have an actively-maintained stable kernel in the archive. * environment - We require that packages critical for DSA operations be available: puppet, samhain, syslog-ng, ferm/pf, etc. Historically, we have not been enforcing these requirements strictly and this has caused / continues to cause us significant operational challenges resulting in our inability to render the service levels that should reasonably be expected of us. Therefore, we believe it is important that all debian.org machines meet these requirements. Based on the list of requirements enumerated above, we currentlty are concerned about the following architectures from the perspective of using them as debian.org machines: * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for the machines we use. * armhf: no remote management (being worked on). * hurd: no puppet/ruby broken (for 3 months+); lack of firewall support. * mips: existing machines are either not reliable or too slow to keep up; we suspect that they may not be easily replaceable. * mipsel: the porter machine and some of the buildd machines have an implementation error for one opcode; missing kernel in the archive * sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable (compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We need to run sparc with oldstable kernels to provide stable machines. That's not an option for long. * s390/x: no stable kernels; not sourceable within our budgets (currently relying on sponsors - this has not been a problem so far). We believe that it is the responsibility of the porter community to either source hardware or provide DSA with proposals regarding the hardware Debian should buy. We encourage the porter community to actively assist DSA with the resolution of the above noted concerns regarding various ports. Thanks, Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administration Team -- "It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle." Martin Zobel-Helas Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer Debian Listmaster http://about.me/zobel Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Request unblock for aiccu 20070115-15.1
Hi, On Thu Jul 05, 2012 at 08:51:19 +0200, Reinier Haasjes wrote: > Hi, > > Axel Beckert uploaded a fix for the following bugs in aiccu: > Bug#667755: FTBFS[kfreebsd] (serious) > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667755 > Bug#670971: Danish translation > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670971 > > Please consider this packages for Wheezy, thanks. As usual sponsor for Reinier, i ACK this request. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120705074140.gm31...@ftbfs.de
Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field
Hi, On Tue Jun 19, 2012 at 13:16:33 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On 19/06/2012 13:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on > >it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of > >the Urgency field: > > > >* Urgency high to beat the freeze. > > > >As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at various > >points before that) if you have serious concerns that important updates > >to your package won't be included in the release, the correct approach > >is to talk to us, not try and work around us. The net effect of the > >above is more likely to be that the urgency will be overriden on the > >britney side as if the package had been uploaded with a lower urgency. > > How would this work? Will you modify the script to look for such cases? britney can set a flag called "age-days X", which means that the page needs to be at least X days old in unstable before it may migrate into testing (with a bit of more magic...). At least it was like this when i was in the release team. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120619114839.gh20...@ftbfs.de
Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy
Hi, On Wed May 30, 2012 at 22:29:32 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Hi, > > > > On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, > >> we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release > >> architectures for the Wheezy release. > >> > >> Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of > >> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, > >> as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us > >> determine sparc's status for the release. > > > > with my DSA hat on: > > > > We no longer have an UltraSparc II porterbox, and we are considering > > decommissioning our single remaining UltraSparc II buildd machine. > > > > Maybe it would be a good idea to officially drop US II support from > > wheezy since we won't have hardware to test issues on. > > Might make sense, but on the other hand the USII machines were usually those > where issues did *not* show up. Especially USIII liked to be a problem child > as > the specs were never released by sun. It got better with USIV again... So some > state like 'not officially supported, but should just work' is probably the > best > for USII. if that means, DSA does not need to operate those machines for the project any more, i am fine with that. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120530203434.gh29...@ftbfs.de
Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy
Hi, On Wed May 16, 2012 at 13:19:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears, > we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release > architectures for the Wheezy release. > > Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, > as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us > determine sparc's status for the release. with my DSA hat on: We no longer have an UltraSparc II porterbox, and we are considering decommissioning our single remaining UltraSparc II buildd machine. Maybe it would be a good idea to officially drop US II support from wheezy since we won't have hardware to test issues on. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120530201601.gg29...@ftbfs.de
Re: Release Team meeting?
Hi, On Thu Mar 29, 2012 at 23:52:02 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if we could do an IRC meeting some time during Easter to > debate arch qualification? When I brought it up in #d-release, it was > followed by a suggestion of doing an IRL meeting. With my DSA hat on: It would make sense to have someone from the DSA team present during that IRC meeting, as architecture qualification has a direct impact on our hardware and resource planning. Could you set up a doodle for that, and keep us posted? Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120329221640.gx19...@ftbfs.de
Re: SAT-Britney status and howto
Hi, On Fri Jul 29, 2011 at 18:38:32 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > It basically works, and even reasonably fast. Also the problem of > finding a Free PMAX-SAT solver is solved: Matthew Gwynne pointed me to > clasp which is already in Debian, was backported to squeeze by me and > installation on ries has been requested (though not performed yet, until > then it still uses minimaxsat). done. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110729165524.go22...@ftbfs.de
Re: [SRM] Approval for finish-install_2.28squeeze1
Hi, On Sat Feb 19, 2011 at 15:36:06 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Dear stable release managers, > > I would like to fix a bug in finish-install, which doesn't enable the > serial console on MIPS Swarm machines during installation, as the serial > devices are called duart0 or duart1 instead of tty*. This bug is quite > important to fix as these machines are used as build daemons in Debian, > and thus should be able to be reinstalled easily. > > Please consider the diff below for finish-install in stable. I think that needs also be fixed in login, so duart0/1 are also enabled in /etc/securetty. Cheers Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011021911.gw25...@ftbfs.de
Re: update of DDP related web pages (phase 1)
Hi, On Mon Feb 07, 2011 at 23:04:05 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > "Debian FAQ" is DDP document still in debiandoc-sgml. > > With upcoming version of debiandoc-sgml (1.2.20+), XML conversion should > be in good shape. I will hold off such conversion. Then *theming* will > be in better shape if you are talking for wheezy/ > > > I shortly looked into them, they seem to be build with docbook. > > Are you talking about this for squeeze 6.0.1? might be an option. Added d-release@ and d-cd@ to CC for that reason. [ to put them into the loop: we are currently discussing to have some of the docbook documentation (release notes, installation manual) rerendered with the Debian website theme for 6.0.1 ] > > Do you guys (from d-doc) see any possibility to help us with that? > > If this is changing of stylesheet only and if release manager approves, > why not. am i reading that correctly: You volunteer for that? Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207165743.gp11...@ftbfs.de
Bug#611267: unblock: gobby-infinote/0.4.93-3
Hi, unblocked. Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110127150352.gi13...@ftbfs.de
Re: Release notes addition for Xen support in Debian
Hi,
On Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 15:34:21 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to have the attached document added to the Squeeze release
> notes. Also, what's the way to have it included? Should I send it as a
> wishlist bug to the "release-notes" package, or something like that?
In general I support this. Those are changes worth mentioning. On the
other hand your text reads more like a howto, which IMHO should be
content for wiki.debian.org. Maybe have the release notes linking a wiki
document instead?
> Could others please give me comments on this? Also, some correction for
> my (poor) English would be welcome when/if you spot issues.
You are aware that we have debian-l10n-engl...@l.d.o for exactly that
reason?
Also i spotted that some of your wording is quite negative
("Unfortunaly", "As a consequence", "Another thing that you have to take
care about", ...). I would like to suggest we come up with at least a
neutral wording here. As I am not a native english speaker either, I
took the liberty to Cc debian-l10n-engl...@l.d.o for a help of rewording
the whole text.
Cheers,
Martin
| 4.7.4. Upgrading with Xen installed, and Kernel enumeration order issue with
| Xen
|
| In Lenny, using grub legacy, the following kernel order was respected: - Xen
| hypervisor with Xen dom0 kernel - Normal (eg: without dom0 support) kernel -
| Xen dom0 kernel (without they hypervisor)
|
| This order was the natural expected one, because if you installed Xen, it will
| simply boot the hypervisor and it's dom0 by default as expected.
|
| Unfortunately, in Squeeze, when running with Grub2, this isn't what is
| happening. By default, the order is the exact opposite: - Xen dom0 kernel
| (without they hypervisor) - Normal (eg: without dom0 support) kernel - Xen
| hypervisor with Xen dom0 kernel
|
| As a consequence, if you have Xen installed and expect to boot with it by
| default, you have to tweak grub2 configuration. One of the way to hack before
| the grub maintainers can fix it the proper way could be to simply do:
|
| ln -s 20_linux_xen /etc/grub.d/09_linux_xen_first dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc
|
| so that Xen is loaded first, by default, when using Grub2.
|
| Another thing that you have to take care about when upgrading from Lenny, is
| that currently, Xen isn't upgraded to the 4.0 version that you should be
| expecting in Squeeze. So, after you finished the dist-upgrade, it is advised
to
| check that Xen 4.0 and the corresponding dom0 kernel are installed. Under the
| 64 bits architecture, the following command will fix this:
|
| apt-get install xen-utils-common xen-utils-4.0 xenstore-utils libxenstore3.0
| xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
|
| Here is the corresponding for 32 bits:
|
| apt-get install xen-utils-common xen-utils-4.0 xenstore-utils libxenstore3.0
| xen-hypervisor-4.0-i686 linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-i686
|
| Also, if you require HVM support, you will need to install the Xen Qemu device
| model, which is now a separate package:
|
| apt-get install xen-qemu-dm-4.0
|
| It is also important to notice that your domU wont be able to use sda1 (for
| example) as device name for their HDD. This naming scheme has been removed
from
| Xen because of a request from the mainline kernel maintainers. Instead, you
| should use xvda1 (as a corresponding example) instead.
|
|
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870
GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101228082316.ga17...@ftbfs.de
Re: Bug#606327: vmmemctl missing in squeeze
Hi, On Wed Dec 08, 2010 at 19:21:50 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > reassign 606327 open-vm-tools > severity 606327 important > thanks > > On 12/08/2010 01:54 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> This makes the package partly unsuable > > right, partially, correcting severity. > >> Please provide vmmemctl on Squeeze machines > > regarding open-vm-tools, according to release managers policy for > unblocks, this is not possible anymore in the current state of the > release. I dissagree with the severity adjustment (but leave it untouched for now). I do belive that this issue needs to be / should be fixed in Sqeeze before the release. Thus I am Cc'ing the release team so we get their input on this. Not having vmmemctl (or vmw_balloon, the new name) in Squeeze means that memory management will be broken within VMs on for VMWare hosts. This is IMHO unacceptable. Cheers Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101208192403.gb1...@ftbfs.de
Re: Please unblock virtualbox-ose
Neil, On Mon Oct 25, 2010 at 09:49:00 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > 3) Remove the package from squeeze did you had a look at it's r-depends? Removing is not an option. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101025093502.ga9...@ftbfs.de
Re: squeeze-ignore for Bug #509287?
Hi, On Tue Sep 14, 2010 at 14:24:29 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > This mail should be sent to the debian-release mailing list, copying in. > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:32:57AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > > please let me kindly ask for setting squeeze-ignore tag for > > serious Bug #509287. > > > > Afio has a problematic license, but in my opinion it should > > not block the squeeze release. We collected all possible information > > and discussed the topic with different persons. > > > > I'm sure it was intended as free software, even if the license > > is not 100% clear about that, but hey, is was 1985 and the > > guys did more hacking and sharing in newsgroups than developing > > license texts. > > > > Over the years this changed and nowadays we have many licenses > > you can compare, you could get already done analysis and choose the one > > which fits best. > > > > Please do not let die afio. > > > Given that this had a lenny-ignore tag and has been open since December > 2008, I'm not happy giving it a squeeze ignore tag. Please note that > this isn't a comment on if the package severity is correct or not, or > the interpetation of the licence means that it's free/contrib/non-free, > it's just that I'm not happy ignoring this issue for yet another two > years. Given that we had no reaction since September 14 (more than a month from now), i am about to remove that package from testing in 10d from now. Due to r-depends I will need to remove some other packages too: * mondo * tob Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022191947.ge6...@ftbfs.de
Bug#600703: unblock: qmail/1.03-49.1
Hi, On Tue Oct 19, 2010 at 07:12:05 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package qmail > > This NMU only adds a small bunch of translation updates. Please note > that this package is in non-free: not sure if that needs specific > handling for testing transition. > > Please note that having this package to migrate is one of the very > last pieces in the puzzle that will lead a few languages to have 100% > debconf translation in squeeze. > > unblock qmail/1.03-49.1 zo...@franck:/org/release.debian.org/britney/hints% dak ls -sunstable qmail qmail |1.03-49 | unstable/non-free | source 20101013211732|process-upload|dak|rejected|qmail_1.03-49.1_i386.changes The key (0xD4E5EDACC0143D2D) used to sign qmail_1.03-49.1_i386.changes wasn't found in the keyring(s). Please try again and come back later! :) Cheers Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101019174541.gj8...@ftbfs.de
Re: Please unblock clamsmtp
Hi, On Sun Oct 10, 2010 at 13:41:42 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > I just uploaded a new version of clamsmtp with the only change being a updated > translation. Please unblock it and let it move to squeeze. done -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101010120608.gt4...@ftbfs.de
Re: virtualbox hopefully for the last time
Hi, On Mon Sep 13, 2010 at 19:23:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 12:34 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > > as Zobel just pointed out, version 3.2.6 is not distributable because Oracle > > forgot to change some copyrights. Therefore I think we are forced to use > > 3.2.8 > > which is fine copyright wise afaict. I'm planning just another upload > > (ideally > > today) to fix some problems with 3.2.8, namely: > > > > - Incorrect dependencies (#595715) > > - Problems with kernel 2.6.36 (#594602) > > - Some manpages were added > > - Ftbfs with recent libdrm-dev (#594599) > > Zobel unblocked 3.2.8-dfsg-2, which appears to be the upload you > mentioned above. yes, i did unblock it, but i bumped the urgency from high to medium via age-days. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913194405.gd4...@ftbfs.de
Re: Bugfixes for icinga-core
Hi, On Sun Sep 05, 2010 at 10:21:41 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Hi, > > I know I'm late.. But we discovered some bugs in icinga 1.0.2 which would be > nice to get fixed for squeeze. So we backported the fixes and I attached them > to this mail. It would be nice if I could do a bugfix upload for icinga. > > 0001-fix-image-urls-555.patch: This patch fixes some image urls which were > borken in 1.0.2. This patch is more or less cosmetic, but it prevents several > 404 in the apache log. > > 0002-fix-copy-paste-error-569.patch: If the configuration file lists > temp_path before check_result_path the former gets overwritten. This patch > fixes that behaviour (https://dev.icinga.org/issues/569) > > 0003-modify-execv-to-execvp-accepting-4096-cmd-args-for-b.patch, > 0004-execvp-searches-in-PATH-too-like-popen-and-returns-i.patch: > 1.0.2 included a new heuristic to detect if a check could be executed without > a shell to speed up things. Unfortunatly that heuristic had some critical > bugs. One of the is that a command can only have 20-1 arguments which often > is not enough. The second of the patches fixes PATH lookups for check > commands. > > 0005-fix-wrong-is_volatile-conditions-causing-wrong-servi.patch: > The volatile check was wrong and caused wrong service alerts > > 0006-fix-multiurl-action-status-icon-macro-processing-fix.patch: > fixes a bug in macro processing and an invalid pointer in extinfo.cgi. Please go ahead and upload. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913115821.ga4...@ftbfs.de
Bug#596669: copyright issues in virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile{, .kmk}
Package: virtualbox-ose Version: 3.2.6-dfsg-2 Severity: serious Hi Michael, while reviewing virtualbox for migration for testing, i found the following issue in the source-code, that probably needs to be fixed before we release squeeze: diff -Nru virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile virtualbox-ose-3.2.8-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile --- virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile 2010-06-25 14:25:42.0 + +++ virtualbox-ose-3.2.8-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile 2010-08-05 11:43:06.0 + @@ -4,8 +4,13 @@ # # Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Oracle Corporation # -# Oracle Corporation confidential -# All rights reserved +# This file is part of VirtualBox Open Source Edition (OSE), as +# available from http://www.virtualbox.org. This file is free software; +# you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU +# General Public License (GPL) as published by the Free Software +# Foundation, in version 2 as it comes in the "COPYING" file of the +# VirtualBox OSE distribution. VirtualBox OSE is distributed in the +# hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any kind. # CC = gcc diff -Nru virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile.kmk virtualbox-ose-3.2.8-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile.kmk --- virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile.kmk 2010-06-25 14:25:42.0 + +++ virtualbox-ose-3.2.8-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile.kmk 2010-08-05 11:43:06.0 + @@ -6,8 +6,13 @@ # # Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Oracle Corporation # -# Oracle Corporation confidential -# All rights reserved +# This file is part of VirtualBox Open Source Edition (OSE), as +# available from http://www.virtualbox.org. This file is free software; +# you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU +# General Public License (GPL) as published by the Free Software +# Foundation, in version 2 as it comes in the "COPYING" file of the +# VirtualBox OSE distribution. VirtualBox OSE is distributed in the +# hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any kind. # -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages virtualbox-ose depends on: ii adduser 3.112add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcurl37.21.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libgcc1 1:4.4.4-9GCC support library ii libpng12-0 1.2.44-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpython2.62.6.6~rc2-1 Shared Python runtime library (ver ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.14-6 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-1 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++6 4.4.4-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libvncserver0 0.9.7-2 API to write one's own vnc server ii libx11-62:1.3.3-3X11 client-side library ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.10-2 X cursor management library ii libxext62:1.1.2-1X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxml2 2.7.7.dfsg-4 GNOME XML library ii libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxt6 1:1.0.7-1X11 toolkit intrinsics library ii python 2.6.5-13 interactive high-level object-orie ii python-central 0.6.16 register and build utility for Pyt ii python2.5 2.5.5-7 An interactive high-level object-o ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime Versions of packages virtualbox-ose recommends: ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]7.7.1-4 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libqt4-opengl 4:4.6.3-1Qt 4 OpenGL module ii libqtcore4 4:4.6.3-1Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4:4.6.3-1Qt 4 GUI module ii virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.2.8-dfsg-1 x86 virtualization solution - kern ii virtualbox-ose-qt 3.2.8-dfsg-1 x86 virtualization solution - Qt b Versions of packages virtualbox-ose suggests: ii libasound2 1.0.23-1shared library for ALSA applicatio ii libpulse00.9.21-3+b1 PulseAudio client libraries pn vde2 (no description available) pn virtualbox-guest-additions (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913090144.94
Bug#596063: unblock: pacemaker-mgmt/2.0.0+hg1141-2
Hi, On Wed Sep 08, 2010 at 13:49:34 +0200, Martin Gerhard Loschwitz wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Ladies and Gentlemen, > > Please unblock the package pacemaker-mgmt. Right now, it is not present > in Squeeze at all. The tool included in this package, which is called > "hb_gui", > used to live in the heartbeat-gui package in Lenny. Due to numerous > changes in the package's source, it was split out of the heartbeat code and > is a single project now. It got updated meanwhile and is in a decent shape > now. Additionally, it is the only graphical user tool present at all in > Debian > at the moment to manipulate a pacemaker-based cluster's configuration. not in testing, harder rules for unblock apply, so: NO. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100908223310.ge3...@ftbfs.de
Re: Please update unblock request for dpkg
Hi, On Mon Aug 30, 2010 at 21:45:00 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Can you unblock it now (1.15.8 reached sid on July 29 so it's one month > old now)? unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100902205222.gv3...@ftbfs.de
Bug#589689: transition to libjack-jackd2-0 breaks many packages
Hi, On Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 19:06:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > #4 (on schroeder): sigill in gcc can you please try to compile it with -O0 on schroeder? -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100902183752.gs3...@ftbfs.de
Re: xrdp update sid->squeeze
Hi, On Wed Sep 01, 2010 at 14:44:09 +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, > > I request xrdp 0.5.0~20100303cvs-6 to be included in squeeze as it fixes > an important bug (#584666) that enables xrdp to be usable with commonly > necessary characters (@). That's important for at least all german users > of xrdp. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100902181515.gq3...@ftbfs.de
Bug#594493: unblock: merkaartor/0.16.3-1
Hi, On Thu Aug 26, 2010 at 14:25:46 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package merkaartor, 0.16.3 is an upstream bugfix release > with the following bugfixes since 0.16.1: > > v0.16.3 > * FIX : language support broken > v0.16.2 > * FIX : Initial viewport issue > * FIX : Do not export incomplete features > * FIX : CSV import bugs > * FIX : Use "GPX track width" setting even when not in "Simple track > appearance" (Merkaartor bug #3095) > * FIX : temporary solution for #3082 > * CHG : Allow to pan with middle mouse button > * FIX : lat/lon grid Merkaartor bug for non-othogonal projections > * FIX : for non-rthogonal projections, maximize the viewport in > lat/lon > * FIX : Handle empty style list in editor (Merkaartor bug #3079) > * FIX : Fix scale bar to take latitude into account. > * FIX : Do not tag-match relation's children unless the type is > "multippolygon" (Merkaartor bug #2916) > * FIX : problem with "Bottom-left standard" TMS > * FIX : OSX fix > * FIX : Draw relations children dashed to avoid multiple parent > drawing > * FIX : Fix several issues with features dock. > * FIX : Fix reappearance of deleted features. > * FIX : Fix WayRemoveNodeCommand reversibility. > > A diff between 0.16.1-1 and 0.16.3-1 is attached to this mail. > > unblock merkaartor/0.16.3-1 unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100827153112.gd3...@ftbfs.de
Re: Unblock freerdp
Hi, On Fri Aug 27, 2010 at 09:52:25 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello > > This release fixes VirtualBox RDP connection issues and other bugs, > please unblock. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100827154004.ge3...@ftbfs.de
Re: Please allow nbd 1:2.9.16-3 to migrate
Hi, On Wed Aug 11, 2010 at 12:36:11 -0400, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > nbd 2.9.16-3 closes one Severity: important bug (#591275), fixes two > regressions wrt anything <= 2.9.15 (including the version currently in > lenny), and adds translation updates. Please allow it to migrate after > its 10-day delay has passed. > > I have a translation deadline later this week, but the important bug was > a bit too annoying for unstable users to wait for that; if there are > more translations on the way, I will need to do another upload for those > but will wait with that until 2.9.16-3 has migrated. I will ask for > another freeze exception if and when necessary. unblocked. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100811195618.gk1...@ftbfs.de
Re: Unblock request for openafs 1.4.12.1+dfsg-3
Hi, On Wed Aug 11, 2010 at 12:03:38 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Hello folks, > > I just uploaded openafs 1.4.12.1+dfsg-3, which contains some final fixes > that are targetted for squeeze based, in part, on discussion with upstream > after the freeze was announced. Could you unblock it for squeeze? unblocked. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100811195148.gj1...@ftbfs.de
Re: Freeze exception: autoconf-nonfree 2.67-1
Hi, On Mon Aug 09, 2010 at 23:19:19 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I see Ben uploaded Autoconf 2.67 during DebConf and it looks like it's > going into squeeze according to the PTS information. I just uploaded > autoconf-nonfree 2.67-1 to build the corresponding documentation package > (non-free because of GFDL with invariant sections). Could you please > unblock it for squeeze so that the documentation and software will be > consistent in the squeeze release? unblocked. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100810114605.gi1...@ftbfs.de
Re: Upcoming etch point release
Hi, On Fri May 14, 2010 at 10:34:45 +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > The next point release for the "etch" oldstable distribution, 4.0r9, is > > scheduled for Saturday, 22nd May. > > I guess this is rather a plain "formality" than an endorsement by the > project that this release is an up-to-date version of "etch" (say as far > as security is concerned). Maybe this should be pointed out more clearly > in order to avoid misunderstandings. before moving etch to archive.debian.org, it makes sense to integrate all pending DSAs into an point release. I am not even sure we can move DSAs into archive seperatly without breaking the GPG signature of the Release file. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100514095119.gs1...@ftbfs.de
Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?
Hi, On Sun Mar 14, 2010 at 21:57:49 +0100, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42, Philipp Kern wrote: > > From a current point of view squeeze will release with kernel 2.6.32 > > Would it be possible to, instead, release with kernel 2.6.33? > > I see at least two improvements from 2.6.32 to 2.6.33 that will matter > a lot to certain subsets of users: > > * The TRIM command has been included in the block layer, allowing > efficient long-term use of SSD drives. > > * EDAC on the amd64 platform has had many fixes, allowing monitoring > and control of EEC ram. Pre-2.6.33 kernels don't support EDAC at all > on many common systems. * MIPS subarch octeon got added. ... There are always good points to go for newer kernels. On the other hand, 2.6.32 will get long-term support and most other distributions will also ship 2.6.32 kernels, which makes eg. security support much easier. Greetings Martin PS: My personal opinion? I would really like to see octeon support for Debian Squeeze... ;-) -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100314215125.gi23...@ftbfs.de
Bug#559834: CVE-2009-3736: please fix this bug via p-u in stable
Hi Adam, according to http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-3736 this issue will not be fixed via DSA, so please prepare an upload to proposed-updates. Thanks Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#559815: CVE-2009-3736: please fix this bug via p-u in stable
Hi Peter, according to http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-3736 this issue will not be fixed via DSA, so please prepare an upload to proposed-updates. Thanks Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#537637: CVE-2009-3050: please fix this bug via p-u in stable
Hi, according to http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-3050 this issue will not be fixed via DSA, so please prepare an upload to proposed-updates. Thanks Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: open issues with the hppa port
Hi, On Fri Sep 11, 2009 at 14:15:06 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:11 PM, dann frazier wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:06:36PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:06 PM, dann frazier wrote: > >> > lafayette is hosted by Thibaut @ ESIEE - I'm not sure what hardware it > >> > is or what kernel it runs. It only does security builds as I > >> > understand it, which should keep the load relatively low. > >> > >> Thibaut indicates that this machine may be doing stable and security > >> builds. Whom do I contact to find that out? > > > > debian-admin probably (cc'd) > > > >> > The remaining boxes are hosted here in Fort Collins. > >> > > >> > paer - this is supposed to be a porterbox (developer access, no > >> > buildd), but we've been running a buildd on it for a while because of > >> > its relative stability. It is an A-class (PA8700 - 750MHz) paer runs a > >> > standard lenny kernel (2.6.26-based). > >> > peri and penalosa are identical boxes - both "model 9000/785/J6700". > >> > They are the ones we currently have running 2.6.31-rc6 kernels. > >> > >> What happened to sarti? Loosing a box like that would certainly add > >> load to the others. > > > > According to db.debian.org: > > > > Status:down: dies in firmware (2007-11) > > Where is sarti physically located? Has there been an attempt to revive it? > yes, its dead. we asked the local admin recently to decommission it. Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please do not idly mess with packages in state Building
Hi, On Wed Sep 02, 2009 at 09:15:40 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi, > > This morning, when I signed the mails from voltaire and malo, I received > one response from voltaire that said that it didn't have OpenOffice.org > taken for building, but that instead it was marked as Dep-Wait. > > Investigating turned up that this was manually modified by a person from > the release team who really should've known better[1]. OpenOffice.org > takes over a day to build[2], and the last thing I need is for it to be > built twice because someone made a silly mistake. > > It's not the first time something like this happens; there have been > several cases where I sign something like 20 mails in the morning, and > say 5 of them come back with "this package is already installed" or > "this package isn't taken for building by you, but by ", > or something similar. *FULL ACK* > Of course there are exceptions. If a package has been in Building for > weeks or months, fixing that is called 'cleanup', and absolutely > welcome. Even this cleanup should be done be the buildd admins itself IMHO. I usually do that together with a chroot-cleanup on the buildd, and thus do not like to have it done by others. I know that i sometimes lag behind a bit (a day or two). Nag me over IRC in that case. Greetings Martin PS: Philip Kern has access to all my buildds as well, so if something needs urgent response, feel free to nag him as well. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#443459: release-notes: With beginning of Lenny /etc/debian_version will be touched with every point release
Hi Nicolas, go ahead. Looks good to me. On Sun Aug 23, 2009 at 00:01:55 +0200, Nicolas François wrote: > Hello Martin, > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:12:19PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > > With the release of Lenny /etc/debian_version will be touched with every > > point release, to reflect the current revision number of the debian > > release (read as in): > > > > now:then: > > 4.1 4.1r0 > > > > That should be documented in the release-notes, as it might brake > > external software. > > Could you review this patch for the release notes. > > I plan to document this in the section "2.2. System improvements" > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#system-changes > > Also, I'm not sure about the above versions. I used 5.0 and 5.0.1 in the > patch. > > Thanks in advance, > -- > Nekral > Index: en/whats-new.dbk > === > --- en/whats-new.dbk (révision 6882) > +++ en/whats-new.dbk (copie de travail) > @@ -492,6 +500,18 @@ > applications that still have difficulties in handling UTF-8. > > > + > + Identification of the release's > revision > + > +Starting from &releasename;, /etc/debian_version > +will indicate the revision number of the debian release (5.0, then > + 5.0.1, etc.) > + > + > +This also means that you should not expect this file to be constant > +throught the release lifetime. > + > + > > > -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please binNMU agda on amd64
Hi, On Tue Aug 11, 2009 at 23:10:24 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Iain Lane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > A new GHC release has been uploaded to sid since agda hit NEW. The > > binary in the archive thus has incorrect deps and is uninstallable. > > Please binNMU it. > > > > nmu agda_2.2.4+dfsg-1 . amd64 -m 'Rebuild against GHC6 6.10.4' > > Someone already scheduled the binNMU. me. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#524172: wrong depends on php5
Package: libphp-jpgraph Version: 1.5.2-11+u1 Severity: grave Hi Christian, your package has wrong dependencies to php5. taken from debian/control: | Depends: libapache2-mod-php5 | php4 | php4-cgi | libapache2-mod-php4, php5-gd | php4-gd taken from http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/jpdownload.php | PHP4: JpGraph 1.x - series | | Note: The 1.x series is only for PHP4. It will not work on PHP5. [...] | PHP5: JpGraph 2.x - series | | Note: The 2.x series is only for PHP5 (>= 5.1.x). It will not work on PHP4. As we do not ship php4 with Lenny any more i suggest the removal of you package from Lenny with the next point release (thus keeping debian-rele...@l.d.o on CC), and updating to a newer version of your package for squeeze/sid. I found that while debugging problems with limesurvey and stumbled over http://bugs.limesurvey.org/view.php?id=2093&nbn=14. Greetings Martin -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: transition plan from libcap to libcap2
Hi, On Wed Apr 01, 2009 at 23:02:12 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: > - quagga fails to build on sparc that looks like a buildd failure > (sp...@buildd on Cc): > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=quagga&arch=sparc&ver=0.99.11-1%2Bb1&stamp=1238271735&file=log&as=raw i thought i gave all packages back when i fixed this issue on lebrun. done now. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
postgresql 8.1.16 and Debian 4.0r7
Hi Martin, do you have any plans for uploading PostgreSQL 8.1.16 before the release of Debian r7? As far as i can see it is a bugfix-only release. We are planing to release r7 next week, so if you should decide to include it into etch, pls speak up NOW. Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: sudo 1.6.9p17-2
Hi, On Wed Jan 28, 2009 at 06:14:36 +1100, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Please allow this new sudo upload into testing as soon as possible, it > includes a patch from upstream that fixes a privilege escalation security > issue present in some sudoers configurations, that affects all 1.6.9 > versions of sudo. unblocked. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: No need to remove tqsllib and trustedqsl from testing
Hi, On Sat Jan 17, 2009 at 19:15:54 +0100, Joop Stakenborg wrote: > tqsllib and trustedqsl were removed by testing-watch, but: > > - I have just fixed #511509. > > - This bug does NOT affect the trustedqsl package. The EVP_VerifyFinal > function is used by tqsl_verifyDataBlock. This function is never used in > the trustedqsl source. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: HPPA and lenny
Hi, On Mon Dec 15, 2008 at 20:57:56 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:06:04AM +0100, J?rgen Leibner wrote: > > > > Hi @all, > > > > I have here an old and also slow HP D360/2 running an up to date Debian > > 5.0 (unstable/testing) with running the debian kernel > > linux-image-2.6.26-1-parisc-smp. > > Two HP machines here too - old and slow, but probably usable. We are not in need in machines actually, just someone needs to fix the code in the kernel for the project ones to become stable again. -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Stable update for reportbug
Hi, On Sun Dec 14, 2008 at 14:45:47 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 14:10, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:08:48PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Is this upload acceptable for you? > > > > Yes, and please upload ASAP. > > Uploaded :) unblocked for stable -- Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[SRM] r5 schedule
Hi, i currently plan to make a mostly "bugfix-only r5 release" (only the DSAs and some selected other packages) next week, without any changes to D-I. If you think that is wrong (because there is an urgent bug that needs to be fixed) please speak up til Tuesday. If ftpmasters agree, we will do the point-release on the next weekend. Thx Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: irqbalance update in etch?
Hi, On Wed Oct 01, 2008 at 15:12:38 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Wed, 01 Oct 2008, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > am Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 12:41:00PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > > irqbalance in etch segfaults when /proc/interrupts contains an interrupt > > > with a number higher than or equal to MAX_INTERRUPTS (256) due to a > > > missing array boundary check. At least it segfaults reliably on all my > > > hosts (say powell.d.o) that have a line starting in the 500s range. > > > > > > The version from lenny/backports does not have this issue. Should we > > > try to fix this in the etch package also? > > > > looks RC to me. If it's just a missing boundary check, please add it > > and post the debdiff. (: > > source interdiff looks like this: > > diff -u irqbalance-0.12/debian/changelog irqbalance-0.12/debian/changelog > --- irqbalance-0.12/debian/changelog > +++ irqbalance-0.12/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ > +irqbalance (0.12-7etch1) stable; urgency=low > + > + * Non maintainer upload. > + * irqbalance would segfault on startup when /proc/interrupts contains > +an interrupt with a number of 256 or larger, since internally it > +stored data in a fixed-length array. Newer versions (say 0.55) have > +replaced the data structure with a list so this is fixed there. For > +now we just skip interrupts with such high numbers, since it's the > +least invasive approach during the stable cycle. > + > + -- Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:06:07 +0200 > + Please mention the Bug# in the changelog. if there isn't any, please go ahead and open an RC bug. Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Update on 'chairs' within the Stable Release Team
Hi, this mail is to let you know that Philipp Kern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is now full Stable Release Manager and that he will coordinating next point releases. I myself step back from the post as SRM due to [1], but will stay around as SRM wizard for a while. Greetings Martin Zobel-Helas [1] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Please allow multipath-tools and multipath-tools-initramfs into lenny
Hi, On Sun Aug 31, 2008 at 14:21:35 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Hi, > > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:21:13PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:25:52AM +, Guido Günther wrote: > >>>> Changes to multipath-tools 0.4.8-11: > >>> I believe this package has an udeb, but it's fine by me if d-i agrees. > >> No objection > > > > unblocked. > > According to [1] multipath-tools-initramfs was not unblocked, please do > so to ensure a smooth update form Etch to Lenny (as described in Guido's > first mail). done -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please allow dictionaries-common_0.98.12 into lenny
Hi, On Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 11:43:01 +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > Please consider inclusion of dictionaries-common_0.98.12 into lenny > > Is already more than 20 days in unstable and contains two changes: > > * Korean debconf stuff update (closes: #491517) > * Documentation change in flyspell.el version doctring (through the >relevant patch) to make it more informative. (closes: #491553) > > 0.98.10 to 0.98.12 patch attached. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: proj 4.6.0-2 in lenny?
Hi, On Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:27:42 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > The -2 upload has only a couple of tiny changes for manpages: > > proj (4.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=low > > > >* proj.3 link moved in the right directory. > > >* Fixing manpages in debian/rules to avoid too narrow rendering. > > > (closes: #495995) > > To clarify proj.3 link was in man1 section before. I'm not sure > if it is acceptable for lenny, but let me try :-) unblocked, but: - -- Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:16:56 -0500 + -- Peter Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 21 Dec 2007 16:46:09 -0500 Why? -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gnucash 2.2.6-2: please allow into testing
Hi, On Thu Aug 28, 2008 at 23:32:49 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Please allow gnucash 2.2.6-2 into testing; this has a minimally invasive > patch to avoid a dangerous data-loss bug in an unusual usage case. > > (It turns out that sshfs returns ENOSYS on a link call. This is wildly > wrong; it has no business doing so, especially when EPERM is already the > documented error for the filesystem-doesn't-support-it case.) > > Regardless, gnucash did poorly in this case, and the patch in 2.2.6-2 > fixes the (release-critical) problem. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock dblatex 0.2.9-3
Hi, On Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 06:46:54 +0200, Andreas Hoenen wrote: > Hi, > > please allow dblatex 0.2.9-3 into Lenny. Wolfgang Borgert has told me > that he wants use dblatex for the pdf versions of the Lenny release > notes as much as possible, and the bugs fixed with the new release will > enable that for some more languages. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock mailreader - RC bug fix
Hi, On Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 16:06:19 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > http://incoming.debian.org/mailreader_2.3.36-3.1_amd64.changes unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock quesoglc 0.7.1-3
Hi, On Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 19:23:06 +0100, Bradley Smith wrote: > Hi, > > Please could you unblock quesoglc 0.7.1-3 which has just been uploaded to > unstable and fixes the RC bug #496324. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock opensc
Hi, On Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 16:55:33 +1000, Steffen Joeris wrote: > Hi > > The new opensc package (0.11.4-5) in unstable adds one correction to the last > security patch. The changes are minimal and the changelog entry is below, > could you please unblock it? unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please, hint man-pages-it 2.80-3 for lenny
Hi, On Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 13:16:38 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > It closes #493883 unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock websvn 2.0-3
Hi, On Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 17:27:53 +0200, Pierre Chifflier wrote: > Hi, > > Please allow websvn 2.0-3 to enter lenny, it fixes a RC bug. > >* Acknowledge NMU (thanks Thijs Kinkhorst) (Closes: #417142) >* Bump standards version to 3.8.0 (no changes) > . > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Fix unconditional use of debconf in postrm (Closes: #417142). unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unblock request for hobbit/4.2.0.dfsg-14
Hi, On Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 19:31:04 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock hobbit/4.2.0.dfsg-14, it is a translation-only update > that includes a new sv debconf template. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock deborphan 1.7.26
Hi, On Sat Aug 16, 2008 at 15:15:02 +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > Hi, > > please unblock deborphan 1.7.26. It fixes an RC bug, contains l10n > updates and corrects the licenses in the file COPYRIGHT. unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pretty, pretty please unblock yelp/2.22.1-6
Hi, On Thu Aug 14, 2008 at 12:40:48 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Heya, > > Please unblock yelp/2.22.1-6. Cumulative changelog: > * Add CVE identifier in 2.22.1-4 and 60_format-string. > * Re-upload for a clean diff, fixing builds. (Closes: #495032) > * Rebuild 70_autotools with libtoolize --force --copy && aclocal-1.9 -I m4 > && autoheader && autoconf && automake-1.9 && autoheader && rm -rf > autom4te.cache config.h.in~. > * SECURITY: New patch, 60_format-string, fixes format string vulnerability; > bump urgency to high; CVE-2008-3533; GNOME #546364; from SVN r3173; > LP: #254860. > > The fix for CVE-2008-3533 is the interesting bit, the rest was just an > embarassing number of tries to get the package actually built. Full diff > available via `d yelp'. unblocked. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Give back octave3.0 on sparc
Hi, On Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 22:35:36 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-24 17:31]: > > > * Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-23 23:03]: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:08:02 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > > > > > > Please, give back octave3.0/3.0.1-6 on sparc. The autobuild failed > > > > with a > > > > cryptic message [1]: > > > > > > > > g++ -c -fPIC -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc > > > > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast -O2 -g > > > > ./DLD-FUNCTIONS/fft2.cc -o pic/fft2.o > > > > /tmp/cc3m4XSW.s: Assembler messages: > > > > /tmp/cc3m4XSW.s:114060: Error: Unknown opcode: `byte' > > > > > > > > Version 3.0.1-5 of the package built fine on sparc [2] and both the g++ > > > > compiler version (4.3_4.3.1-6) and the fft2.cc file were the same in the > > > > octave3.0_3.0.1-6 autobuild. > > > > > > What about binutils? > > > > No, the versions of binutils are the same for both the failing and > > successful autobuilds. BTW, none of the toolchain packages changed: > > > > Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.7-12 gcc-4.3_4.3.1-6 > > g++-4.3_4.3.1-6 binutils_2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 libstdc++6-4.3-dev_4.3.1-6 > > libstdc++6_4.3.1-6 > > Any news about my give-back request? done yesterday evening. Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: iceape on ia64
Hi, On Mon Jul 28, 2008 at 12:27:40 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Hi, > > iceape was successfully built on ia64 11 days ago, but it still hasn’t > been uploaded. > > Could you consider uploading it or re-scheduling an upload? Pinged the buildd admin. he will have a look into it. Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update
Hi, On Sun Jul 27, 2008 at 15:19:25 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 02:29:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > I'm wondering who wrote: > > > > As linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf was not ready in time we decided to > > > > skip it for r4 and include it in r5. > > > > Frans Pop wrote: > > > Well done folks. You've again managed to break at least part of the > > > functionality of Debian Installer and, more importantly, left users with > > > a potentially unbootable system after installation. > > > > You can now partition using loop-aes encryption, but the modules are > > not > > available for the installed system. > > So you cannot access any loop-aes encrypted partitions. > > Or (hopefully) the installation will fail during finish-install. > > > > Well, it would seem we have the first peice of errata for the end of > > http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/debian-installer/etchnhalf > > How's this? > > Index: etchnhalf.wml > === > RCS file: > /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/releases/etch/debian-installer/etchnhalf.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.4 > diff -u -p -r1.4 etchnhalf.wml > --- etchnhalf.wml 15 Jul 2008 08:56:10 - 1.4 > +++ etchnhalf.wml 27 Jul 2008 21:17:42 - > @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ release. > Errata specific to etch-and-a-half > > > -No known issues. > +Partitions encrypted using loop-AES will not be accessable after > installation. > +This issue is due to the absence of loop-aes kernel modules for the etchnhalf > +kernel. These modules will be made available in the next update of Debian > +GNU/Linux 4.0, 4.0r5. > > We just agreed with Joerg Jaspert to post-release the missing modules as soon as he has arrived in Argentina. Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#491263: network-console, etch netinst, openssh
Hi, On Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:45:32 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > reassign 491263 debian-installer 20070308etch2 > thanks > > On Friday 18 July 2008, Mike Edwards wrote: > > A few issues relating to network-console on etch netinst 4.0r3: > > > > * Keys generated by network-console are found on the blacklist included > > with newer versions of openssh-server. > > > > * If network-console is used for a new installation, openssh-server is > > installed on the new system, but .broken keys are left lying around in > > /etc/ssh. > > > > * Likewise to above, the rsa host key (/etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.pub) > > is found to be on the blacklist, and appears that it may be the same > > rsa key used during installation via network-console. > > That is correct. Thanks for alerting us to the issue. > > For most architectures c.q. installation methods this will be fixed > automatically with the next point release (coming very soon) as the fixed > version of openssh will be included on the CD images. > > What (I personally at least) had not realized yet is that that still > leaves a few cases where network-console is included in the D-I initrds. > This affects in particular s390, arm (iop32x/ixp4xx) and mipsel (cobalt). > > Stable Release team: > Have fixed versions of openssh/openssl already been accepted into p-u? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dak ls -S -sstable,proposed-updates openssh openssl openssh-client | 1:4.3p2-9 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssh-client | 1:4.3p2-9etch2 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssh-client-udeb | 1:4.3p2-9 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssh-client-udeb | 1:4.3p2-9etch2 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssh-server | 1:4.3p2-9 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssh-server | 1:4.3p2-9etch2 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssh-server-udeb | 1:4.3p2-9 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssh-server-udeb | 1:4.3p2-9etch2 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc ssh | 1:4.3p2-9 |stable | all ssh | 1:4.3p2-9etch2 | proposed-updates | all ssh-askpass-gnome | 1:4.3p2-9 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc ssh-askpass-gnome | 1:4.3p2-9etch2 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc ssh-krb5 | 1:4.3p2-9 |stable | all ssh-krb5 | 1:4.3p2-9etch2 | proposed-updates | all openssh | 1:4.3p2-9 |stable | source openssh | 1:4.3p2-9etch2 | proposed-updates | source libcrypto0.9.8-udeb | 0.9.8c-4etch1 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libcrypto0.9.8-udeb | 0.9.8c-4etch3 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libssl-dev | 0.9.8c-4etch1 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libssl-dev | 0.9.8c-4etch3 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libssl0.9.8 | 0.9.8c-4etch1 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libssl0.9.8 | 0.9.8c-4etch3 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libssl0.9.8-dbg | 0.9.8c-4etch1 |stable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libssl0.9.8-dbg | 0.9.8c-4etch3 | proposed-updates | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssl | 0.9.8c-4etch1 |stable | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc openssl | 0.9.8c-4etch3 | proposed-updates | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > If they have and given the above I propose to do a new upload of > debian-installer to be included in 4.0r4. If all goes well, they should > be built with time to spare for the planned schedule but we would need > quick responses if there are issues. > > Any objections against an upload? There would be no other changes. go ahead. if you need any assistance, don't hesitate to contact me (see IRC) Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D6
Re: please allow ltsp 5.1.9-1 into testing
Hi, On Fri May 30, 2008 at 00:32:55 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > ltsp is again blocked from migrating into testing, likely due to the > ltsp-client-builder udeb, though this udeb is not used by > debian-installer by default. > > it has been in unstable for 7 days now, without introducing new > problems, and fixes several bugs. d-i team: any comments about that? Greetings Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock libsdl1.2/1.2.13-2
Hi, On Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 17:31:00 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > [Cc:ed debian-boot as the package has an udeb] > > Hi, > > libsdl1.2/1.2.13-2 is ready to move to testing. This version fixes a > problem with gcc 4.3 on i386 and has no known regression. It is > currently blocked into unstable because it has an udeb. Could you please > unblock it? unblocked -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please add following hint to block linux-2.6 until Beta1 is out
Hi, On Thu Feb 14, 2008 at 16:49:51 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello RM and SRM teams, > > I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1 > gets out. If it migrates before we do the final images we can need to > delay d-i release. ACK from SRM side. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: missing block to win32-loader
Hi, On Thu Feb 14, 2008 at 15:05:22 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello RM team, > > win32-loader ought to be coordinated with d-i team to avoid breakage > on weekly builds after Beta1 has been released and then it shouldn't > be allowed to go to testing without our approval. > > Please, add (needs approval section): > > block win32-loader added. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hints to allow win32-loader to go to testing
Hi, On Thu Feb 14, 2008 at 11:02:09 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello RM team, > > For Debian Installer Beta1 we need to get lastest win32-loader in > testing. For it, following hints need to be added. > > urgent cpio/2.9-11 > urgent gzip/1.3.12-5 > urgent win32-loader/0.6.0 age-days 6 cpio/2.9-11 unblock cpio/2.9-11 age-days 6 gzip/1.3.12-5 unblock gzip/1.3.12-5 age-days 6 win32-loader/0.6.0 unblock win32-loader/0.6.0 set. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please unblock user-setup 1.18
Hi, On Wed Feb 06, 2008 at 07:44:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hi, > > please hint user-setup 1.18; it fixes an important regression brought in > with 1.17. unblocked. -- Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian Release Team Member Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870 GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
