Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 603710 squeeze-can-defer tag 603710 squeeze-ignore kthxbye On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:57:21 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 24, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you could > > provide a patch or NMU, or at least give some details about this since > > you seem to know what this is about and there's no details in the bug > > log... > This is what the upstream maintainer had to say on the matter: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590665#20 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593625#25 > > I had to revert the change discussed in #593625 because the LVM rules > have not been updated. > > I do not know lvm enough to provide a reasonably safe patch. > Then unless waldi reappears or someone does provide a patch, it doesn't seem like there's anything we can do about this. Tagging accordingly. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)
On Dec 24, Julien Cristau wrote: > I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you could > provide a patch or NMU, or at least give some details about this since > you seem to know what this is about and there's no details in the bug > log... This is what the upstream maintainer had to say on the matter: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590665#20 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593625#25 I had to revert the change discussed in #593625 because the LVM rules have not been updated. I do not know lvm enough to provide a reasonably safe patch. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 21:21:06 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 16, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue. > > I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight > LVM is unreliable in squeeze. > > > it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see > > in squeeze? > The upstream maintainer requested that the udev rules are updated, and > so I did. > I even added back a bug to udev because this was not fixed. The > maintainer did not provide any counterargument. > What else should I do? > I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you could provide a patch or NMU, or at least give some details about this since you seem to know what this is about and there's no details in the bug log... Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)
On Dec 16, Julien Cristau wrote: > > CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue. > I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight LVM is unreliable in squeeze. > it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see > in squeeze? The upstream maintainer requested that the udev rules are updated, and so I did. I even added back a bug to udev because this was not fixed. The maintainer did not provide any counterargument. What else should I do? -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:03:08 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue. > I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see in squeeze? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)
On 16.11.2010 18:44, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 16, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> As you can see from the attached log, while the symlinks in /dev are >> created, they do not show up correctly in the udev database (not the >> missing S: entries for dm-0 and dm-1), so the information is out of >> sync. > As detailed in #590665 and #593625 and as requested by the upstream > dmsetup maintainer, the lvm userspace needs to be fixed to cooperate > with udev. > I can't understand why this is not RC. I'm fine with bumping the severity. As systemd is currently only available in experimental, it doesn't affect the squeeze release, yet udisks is (and possibly other programs using udev). CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
