Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
On 2012-07-31 11:02, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-07-18 13:34, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> [...] >> >> There are still 2 problems remaining: lestiff2 (patch in BTS) and cyrus-sasl >> (needs a sourcefull upload to fix binNMU / multiarch problem). >> > > [...] > > It is my understanding that lesstif2 is the last M-A conversion needed > for ia32-libs. Assuming the changes to lesstif2 and mtink are > reasonable, cyrus-sasl just needs a "no-change" upload and ia32-libs is > good to go. > mtink is in testing, cyrus-sasl2 is fixed in sid with an unblock. lesstif2 does not have an unblock, but assuming it got one, it could migrate with the next Britney run. >> [...] >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677762 >> >> The number of issues have gone down but not far enough yet. Most >> critical and trivial there is: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650777 >> >> That one prevents ia32-libs-gtk to be installable with a dependency on >> libgnomecanvas and 3rd party binaries still depend on that. >> >> [...] > > > It seems like most of those bugs are libraries needing converted to M-A > (i.e. usr/lib -> usr/lib/$MADIR) and #650777 is the "exception". > > What do we "lose" if only the "trivial" bugs are fixed? By trivial I > mean only patches that add "Multi-Arch: $val" fields like #650777 (so no > moving of libraries from usr/lib to usr/lib/$MADIR). > > ~Niels > > [...] I would still like to get an idea of what needs the last packages unfixed packages. Having reviewed some of the bugs, I realized that some of them have no patches, liborbit2 seems to invovle plugins that will most likely entangle "unrelated" packages, at least libbonobo has an unanswered "interesting question"... ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/502b62a7.2070...@thykier.net
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
[Nicholas Breen] > That bug is waiting on a new cmake upload -- would it be acceptable > to the RT to remove gromacs from testing, allowing lesstif2 to > migrate, and then re-admitting a binNMU'ed gromacs after cmake is > updated? Assuming the lesstif and (as-yet-unavailable) cmake > migrations themselves are allowed, of course. There is no need to remove gromacs in order for lesstif2 to migrate. There's no SONAME bump or anything. The issue only came up at all, because we needed to make sure the new lesstif2 does not add any new FTBFS in other packages. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731194557.ge4...@p12n.org
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:02:55AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > A patched version of lesstif2 appears to have been uploaded. To my > knowledge it caused mtink to FTBFS, which has been fixed (see #683316). > There have also been noticed issues with gromacs and cmucl, but these > appear to be unrelated to the multi-arch conversion[1]. [...] > [1] The gromacs issue appears to be #680825, which was filed before the > M-A conversion. Yes, it is. gromacs builds correctly with the multiarch lesstif2 as long as cmake is downgraded to 2.8.8-3, which avoids #680825/#681428. That bug is waiting on a new cmake upload -- would it be acceptable to the RT to remove gromacs from testing, allowing lesstif2 to migrate, and then re-admitting a binNMU'ed gromacs after cmake is updated? Assuming the lesstif and (as-yet-unavailable) cmake migrations themselves are allowed, of course. -- Nicholas Breen nbr...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731185914.gj9...@ofb.net
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
On 2012-07-18 13:34, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > [...] > > There are still 2 problems remaining: lestiff2 (patch in BTS) and cyrus-sasl > (needs a sourcefull upload to fix binNMU / multiarch problem). > A patched version of lesstif2 appears to have been uploaded. To my knowledge it caused mtink to FTBFS, which has been fixed (see #683316). There have also been noticed issues with gromacs and cmucl, but these appear to be unrelated to the multi-arch conversion[1]. I have CC'ed Peter Samuelson, who have been conducting most of the lesstif2 rdep rebuilds. It is my understanding that lesstif2 is the last M-A conversion needed for ia32-libs. Assuming the changes to lesstif2 and mtink are reasonable, cyrus-sasl just needs a "no-change" upload and ia32-libs is good to go. > [...] > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677762 > > The number of issues have gone down but not far enough yet. Most > critical and trivial there is: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650777 > > That one prevents ia32-libs-gtk to be installable with a dependency on > libgnomecanvas and 3rd party binaries still depend on that. > > [...] It seems like most of those bugs are libraries needing converted to M-A (i.e. usr/lib -> usr/lib/$MADIR) and #650777 is the "exception". What do we "lose" if only the "trivial" bugs are fixed? By trivial I mean only patches that add "Multi-Arch: $val" fields like #650777 (so no moving of libraries from usr/lib to usr/lib/$MADIR). ~Niels [1] The gromacs issue appears to be #680825, which was filed before the M-A conversion. cmulc allegedly to have a broken "build-arch" setup; not sure if a bug has been reported for that yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50179f3f.3050...@thykier.net
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:53:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:13 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > [...] > > > - libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), libdb4.8 (>= 4.8.30-2), > > > + libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), > [...] > > Is that the only (non-changelog) change in the package? If so then feel > > free to get it uploaded and then come back to us with an unblock > > request. > > You appear to have done the former of those, but never bothered with the > latter... There are still 2 problems remaining: lestiff2 (patch in BTS) and cyrus-sasl (needs a sourcefull upload to fix binNMU / multiarch problem). I wanted them solved before I request ia32-libs goes into testing. > > Note that in any case the package won't migrate with #677741 > > in the way. > > That wasn't meant as a suggestion to simply downgrade the bug :-p I downgraded the bug because the critical issues have been solved. That means that many users can install ia32-libs and use it just fine. But not everyone can. So there is still room for improvement. Ia32-libs is at a stage where it is possible to release it with a slightly reduced usefullness. But idealy I would like there to be no regression to squeeze, namely the two issues above. > In an earlier thread you mentioned a number of multiarch issues with http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677762 The number of issues have gone down but not far enough yet. Most critical and trivial there is: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650777 That one prevents ia32-libs-gtk to be installable with a dependency on libgnomecanvas and 3rd party binaries still depend on that. > ia32-libs-gtk; what's the current status there? Also: > > out of date on ia64: ia32-libs-gtk (from 20120102) Pending removal. > Regards, > > Adam MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120718113459.GC5976@frosties
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:13 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [...] > > - libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), libdb4.8 (>= 4.8.30-2), > > + libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), [...] > Is that the only (non-changelog) change in the package? If so then feel > free to get it uploaded and then come back to us with an unblock > request. You appear to have done the former of those, but never bothered with the latter... > Note that in any case the package won't migrate with #677741 > in the way. That wasn't meant as a suggestion to simply downgrade the bug :-p In an earlier thread you mentioned a number of multiarch issues with ia32-libs-gtk; what's the current status there? Also: out of date on ia64: ia32-libs-gtk (from 20120102) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1342565606.14254.24.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > [Dropped pkg-db-devel from Cc because it apparently doesn't accept posts > from non-subscribers] > > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Looking at the package currently in unstable, I do have to ask what >> happened to: >> >> ia32-libs-20120616/debian/copyright|13164 -- > > Answering my own question, it's presumably a side-effect of no longer > embedding loads of other packages, so not needing to ship their > copyright information. > > Regards, > > Adam Indeed. It's just 2 empty transitional packages now that pull in everything that used to be in ia32-libs through dependencies. So no embedding of loads of other packages and therefore no need to repeat the copyright infos. You will notice it got ~400MB smaller too (including binaries). MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obnzbqi5.fsf@frosties.localnet
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
[Dropped pkg-db-devel from Cc because it apparently doesn't accept posts from non-subscribers] On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Looking at the package currently in unstable, I do have to ask what > happened to: > > ia32-libs-20120616/debian/copyright|13164 -- Answering my own question, it's presumably a side-effect of no longer embedding loads of other packages, so not needing to ship their copyright information. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341141815.8055.51.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:13 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Sven Joachim writes: > > Your package depends on libdb4.8 which is no longer available in > > unstable. > > It is still in wheezy. No, it isn't (and wasn't when you mailed). > I assume it is going to be removed there as well? It was removed in last night's britney run. > Dear Release Team, > > as per http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html I'm CCing you > on this bug (#679671) to ask for a freeze exception. > > == > diff -Nru ia32-libs-20120616/debian/control ia32-libs-20120701/debian/control > --- ia32-libs-20120616/debian/control 2012-06-16 21:30:00.0 +0200 > +++ ia32-libs-20120701/debian/control 2012-07-01 10:54:26.0 +0200 > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ > libavahi-common3 (>= 0.6.27-2+squeeze1), libbsd0 (>= 0.2.0-1), > libcap2 (>= 1:2.19-3), > libcomerr2 (>= 1.41.12-4stable1), libcups2 (>= 1.4.4-7+squeeze1), > - libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), libdb4.8 (>= 4.8.30-2), > + libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), > libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.2.24-4+squeeze1), libdirectfb-1.2-9 (>= 1.2.10.0-4), > libdrm-intel1 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libdrm-radeon1 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), > libdrm2 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libedit2 (>= 2.11-20080614-2), > == Is that the only (non-changelog) change in the package? If so then feel free to get it uploaded and then come back to us with an unblock request. Note that in any case the package won't migrate with #677741 in the way. Looking at the package currently in unstable, I do have to ask what happened to: ia32-libs-20120616/debian/copyright|13164 -- Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341140209.8055.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
Am 01.07.2012 um 11:13 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow: > Sven Joachim writes: > >> Package: ia32-libs-i386 >> Version: 20120616 >> Severity: serious >> >> Your package depends on libdb4.8 which is no longer available in >> unstable. > > It is still in wheezy. Not anymore. > I assume it is going to be removed there as well? It was removed yesterday when libdb4.8 4.8.30-12 migrated. Cheers, Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vf3kazj.fsf...@turtle.gmx.de
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8
Sven Joachim writes: > Package: ia32-libs-i386 > Version: 20120616 > Severity: serious > > Your package depends on libdb4.8 which is no longer available in > unstable. It is still in wheezy. I assume it is going to be removed there as well? Dear Release Team, as per http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html I'm CCing you on this bug (#679671) to ask for a freeze exception. == diff -Nru ia32-libs-20120616/debian/control ia32-libs-20120701/debian/control --- ia32-libs-20120616/debian/control 2012-06-16 21:30:00.0 +0200 +++ ia32-libs-20120701/debian/control 2012-07-01 10:54:26.0 +0200 @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ libavahi-common3 (>= 0.6.27-2+squeeze1), libbsd0 (>= 0.2.0-1), libcap2 (>= 1:2.19-3), libcomerr2 (>= 1.41.12-4stable1), libcups2 (>= 1.4.4-7+squeeze1), - libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), libdb4.8 (>= 4.8.30-2), + libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.2.24-4+squeeze1), libdirectfb-1.2-9 (>= 1.2.10.0-4), libdrm-intel1 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libdrm-radeon1 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libdrm2 (>= 2.4.21-1~squeeze3), libedit2 (>= 2.11-20080614-2), == The package is uploaded to mentors awaiting sponsoring: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ia32-libs http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ia32-libs/ia32-libs_20120701.dsc MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vci7lu8n.fsf@frosties.localnet
