Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably have been more useful, fwiw. Noted for the future. The source and amd64 binaries are to be found at: deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix . deb-src http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix . Please go ahead; thanks. Done -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130311162138.ga6...@mix.mmjgroup.com
Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 06:27 -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: Per the IRC discussion, I have prepared postfix_2.9.6-2 for wheezy. Please let me know when to upload it. The debdiff is below. A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably have been more useful, fwiw. The source and amd64 binaries are to be found at: deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix . deb-src http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix . Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1362851972.26434.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #702412 [release.debian.org] pre-approval unblock: postfix Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 702412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702412 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b702412.13628519828746.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
Per the IRC discussion, I have prepared postfix_2.9.6-2 for wheezy. Please let me know when to upload it. The debdiff is below. The source and amd64 binaries are to be found at: deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix . deb-src http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix . lamont diff -u postfix-2.9.6/debian/control postfix-2.9.6/debian/control --- postfix-2.9.6/debian/control +++ postfix-2.9.6/debian/control @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ Source: postfix Section: mail Priority: extra -Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com -XSBC-Original-Maintainer: LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org +Maintainer: LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org Standards-Version: 3.9.1.0 Homepage: http://www.postfix.org Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), po-debconf (= 0.5.0), groff-base, patch, lsb-release, libdb-dev (=4.6.19), libldap2-dev (=2.1), libpcre3-dev, libmysqlclient-dev|libmysqlclient15-dev|libmysqlclient14-dev, libssl-dev (=0.9.7), libsasl2-dev, libpq-dev, libcdb-dev, hardening-wrapper, dpkg-dev (= 1.15.5), libsqlite3-dev diff -u postfix-2.9.6/debian/changelog postfix-2.9.6/debian/changelog --- postfix-2.9.6/debian/changelog +++ postfix-2.9.6/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +postfix (2.9.6-2) wheezy; urgency=low + + * Fix fumbled merge to actually have the right maintainer address. +See also bug 702412. Closes: #699877 + + -- LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:28:23 -0700 + postfix (2.9.6-1) unstable; urgency=low [Wietse Venema] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi Release Team, I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message in the bug log for details. If LaMont is not currently available to make the upload to sid to fix the maintainer field, I'll gladly NMU this. Please let me know if you think is this a viable solution. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130306080950.5772.91863.reportbug@localhost.localdomain
Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 06.03.2013 08:09, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message in the bug log for details. If LaMont is not currently available to make the upload to sid to fix the maintainer field, I'll gladly NMU this. It looks like the maintainer field is already fixed in sid, in 2.10.0-1; that is a number of upstream releases more recent than the current wheezy package, however. Your last message in #700719 indicates that your inclination towards an unblock was based on the assumption that the package involved would be 2.9.6; is that correct? Even after filtering the diff down quite a lot to remove documentation changes etc. we still appear to be left with a diff of 217 files changed, 5476 insertions(+), 1476 deletions(-) which isn't /that/ bad but not ideal at this point. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b01d46d6da1966746533256640d3f...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #702412 [release.debian.org] pre-approval unblock: postfix Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 702412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702412 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b702412.136256138513420.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
Op woensdag 6 maart 2013 10:16:18 schreef Adam D. Barratt: It looks like the maintainer field is already fixed in sid, in 2.10.0-1; that is a number of upstream releases more recent than the current wheezy package, however. Your last message in #700719 indicates that your inclination towards an unblock was based on the assumption that the package involved would be 2.9.6; is that correct? Even after filtering the diff down quite a lot to remove documentation changes etc. we still appear to be left with a diff of 217 files changed, 5476 insertions(+), 1476 deletions(-) which isn't that bad but not ideal at this point. Right, since I posted my proposal indeed a new upstream has been uploaded on Monday to sid making the migration impossible. I do not advocate migrating 2.10.0. I was convinced that migration should be possible precisely because it was an upstream bugfix, not a new major rleease. I'd like to reword my proposal then to uploading 2.9.6-1, as it was in sid, to tpu. Only changes would be a new version number (2.9.6-1+wheezy1?) and fixed maintainer. My filtered diff of that, as attached to #700719, amounts to: 22 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) Cheers, Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message in the bug log for details. wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given Wietse's track record, I'm inclined to just go with 2.10.0-1, but if the release team would like 2.9.6-2 uploaded to tpu, I'd be happy to do so. Just let me know. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130306142203.gb3...@mix.mmjgroup.com
