Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Control: tag -1 confirmed Niels Thykier (2015-03-08): > On 2015-02-09 22:14, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Le dimanche, 8 février 2015, 21.54:04 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > >> Niels Thykier (2015-02-06): > >>> [...] > >> Since d-i-n-i is basically about collecting files in packages (see > >> get-images.sh), and about shipping them through various binaries, this > >> kind of things is /possibly/ harmless, but I really didn't check > >> anything. It would probably be helpful to double check that dh 7 and > >> dh 9 lead to identical binaries, and maybe think about letting this > >> change slide with the rest (but so far I really have no opinion on > >> this). > > > > So I've gone and done that (twice), the result of all debdiffs is exactl > > identical: > > > >> File lists identical (after any substitutions) > >> > >> No differences were encountered between the control files > > > > This show that the change (but also that the revert) is harmless. > > Frankly, I'd find the "explicit no-go therefore imposing a revert" quite > > silly in this specific case. > > > > [...] > > KiBi, if you (as d-i RM) are happy with that, I am willing to make the > exception - you are the one that gets to keep the pieces if it breaks. :) Sure, fair enough; let's do that, ta! Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #776928 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 776928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b776928.14258435374286.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Processing control commands: > tags -1 -moreinfo d-i Bug #776928 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 776928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b776928.14258432682844.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo d-i On 2015-02-09 22:14, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi all, > > Le dimanche, 8 février 2015, 21.54:04 Cyril Brulebois a écrit : >> Niels Thykier (2015-02-06): >>> [...] >> Since d-i-n-i is basically about collecting files in packages (see >> get-images.sh), and about shipping them through various binaries, this >> kind of things is /possibly/ harmless, but I really didn't check >> anything. It would probably be helpful to double check that dh 7 and >> dh 9 lead to identical binaries, and maybe think about letting this >> change slide with the rest (but so far I really have no opinion on >> this). > > So I've gone and done that (twice), the result of all debdiffs is exactl > identical: > >> File lists identical (after any substitutions) >> >> No differences were encountered between the control files > > This show that the change (but also that the revert) is harmless. > Frankly, I'd find the "explicit no-go therefore imposing a revert" quite > silly in this specific case. > > [...] KiBi, if you (as d-i RM) are happy with that, I am willing to make the exception - you are the one that gets to keep the pieces if it breaks. :) Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54fca43a.1010...@thykier.net
Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Hi all,
Le dimanche, 8 février 2015, 21.54:04 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Niels Thykier (2015-02-06):
> > A debhelper compat is an explicit no-go per the freeze policy.
> >
> > Otherwise, looks good to me.
>
> It's a bit unfortunate that d-i-n-i is huge and not too useful to
> upload during the release cycle in that we get to only notice this
> kind of things ("woops, we bumped the debhelper version compat in
> that package too but it never reached testing") during the freeze;
> sorry about that.
>
> Since d-i-n-i is basically about collecting files in packages (see
> get-images.sh), and about shipping them through various binaries, this
> kind of things is /possibly/ harmless, but I really didn't check
> anything. It would probably be helpful to double check that dh 7 and
> dh 9 lead to identical binaries, and maybe think about letting this
> change slide with the rest (but so far I really have no opinion on
> this).
So I've gone and done that (twice), the result of all debdiffs is exactl
identical:
> File lists identical (after any substitutions)
>
> No differences were encountered between the control files
This show that the change (but also that the revert) is harmless.
Frankly, I'd find the "explicit no-go therefore imposing a revert" quite
silly in this specific case.
> In case the explicit no-go stays (which I'd consider fair, to be
> honest), I'd rather avoid doing nasty things with the release version
> numbering (see Holger's reply), and get the revert through an upload
> matching RC 2. Which means getting d-i-n-i even later in testing but
> that would probably be safer.
That's technically correct. I'd find it quite sad to postpone a
migration to testing for d-i-n-i, especially as every d-i upload [or at
the very least, the final d-i] will impose a d-i-n-i upload and
migration, again.
> On a slightly different note: Why we're still using a non-debian.org
> mirror (MIRROR in debian/rules) is still beyond me.
Using http.debian.net accelerates my builds by a big margin. I don't
care enough though, so feel free to commit a change.
Cheers,
OdyX
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1526927.S1h565oRuT@gyllingar
Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
(Adding -boot@ for reference.)
Hi,
Niels Thykier (2015-02-06):
> A debhelper compat is an explicit no-go per the freeze policy.
>
> Otherwise, looks good to me.
It's a bit unfortunate that d-i-n-i is huge and not too useful to upload
during the release cycle in that we get to only notice this kind of
things ("woops, we bumped the debhelper version compat in that package
too but it never reached testing") during the freeze; sorry about that.
Since d-i-n-i is basically about collecting files in packages (see
get-images.sh), and about shipping them through various binaries, this
kind of things is /possibly/ harmless, but I really didn't check
anything. It would probably be helpful to double check that dh 7 and dh
9 lead to identical binaries, and maybe think about letting this change
slide with the rest (but so far I really have no opinion on this).
In case the explicit no-go stays (which I'd consider fair, to be
honest), I'd rather avoid doing nasty things with the release version
numbering (see Holger's reply), and get the revert through an upload
matching RC 2. Which means getting d-i-n-i even later in testing but
that would probably be safer.
On a slightly different note: Why we're still using a non-debian.org
mirror (MIRROR in debian/rules) is still beyond me.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Hi, On Freitag, 6. Februar 2015, Niels Thykier wrote: > > debian-installer-netboot-images (20150107) unstable; urgency=low > > * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. so I went ahead and prepared the uploaded in git, reverted this change and added myself to uploaders even and then upon running "dch -r" I noticed the version, which was set to 20150108, which is neither todays date nor, more importantly, the date of the d-i release it contains. Bummer. The README says: * Note about versioning: - This package's version is simply the version of the d-i netboot images it fetches and ships. - Since d-i can be binNMU'd in stable (usually to get built against a newer kernel in proposed-updates, when no source changes are planned for stable), its version ends with +bN; using the exact same version for this package wouldn't work too well because a couple of assumptions are made in the Debian infrastructure (notably in dak) when a binNMU-like version number is seen. To work around those, the .bN suffix is used instead of the usual +bN suffix. but I don't think using a binNMU version for a normal upload would be smart. Given this, and given that the debhelper compat bump was announced in May 2013 and committed in June 2013, I wonder whether the cleanest cause of action wouldnt just be to accept this debhelper bump?!? (Another option would be to delay the upload until the next d-i release, but IMO that would be even worse, as debian-lan-config, debian-edu and debian-edu- config all rely on this package and thus cannot be tested properly since basically forever.) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Hi, On Freitag, 6. Februar 2015, Niels Thykier wrote: > > * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. > A debhelper compat is an explicit no-go per the freeze policy. > Otherwise, looks good to me. Niels, so you're suggesting another upload with just that change reverted? Didier, can you do that or should I? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2015-02-03 12:54, Holger Levsen wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org > > Hi, > > please unblock debian-installer-netboot-images/201501078 as the version > currently in testing is unusable with jessie. > > [... skipping a diffstat ...] > > debian-installer-netboot-images (20150107) unstable; urgency=low > > * Update to 20150107 images. > > [ Dmitrijs Ledkovs ] > * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. > > [...] > > > cheers, > Holger > Hi, A debhelper compat is an explicit no-go per the freeze policy. Otherwise, looks good to me. Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54d541e5.2050...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #776928 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 776928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b776928.14232621902273.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#776928: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150107
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org Hi, please unblock debian-installer-netboot-images/201501078 as the version currently in testing is unusable with jessie. $ debdiff debian-installer-netboot-images_20130613+deb7u2.b4.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20150107.dsc|diffstat debian/README |2 - debian/changelog| 54 +--- debian/compat |2 - debian/control | 48 +++ debian/control.in |2 - debian/lintian-overrides.in |5 debian/rules|9 --- get-images.sh | 17 - 8 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) debian-installer-netboot-images (20150107) unstable; urgency=low * Update to 20150107 images. [ Dmitrijs Ledkovs ] * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. [ Didier Raboud ] * Update architectures' list, distribution codename and major version for Jessie (Closes: #766960) * Add a kfreebsd netboot directory postfix special-case * Add new matching lintian overrides * Move to one-digit versioning, aka from '-7.0-' to '-8-' [ Cyril Brulebois ] * Update README to document fancy .bN suffix for d-i-n-i when d-i has +bN. * Add a check in get-images.sh to detect wrong binNMU versioning. -- Didier Raboud Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:34:48 +0100 Full diff attached for your convinience... cheers, Holger diff -Nru debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/changelog debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/changelog --- debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/changelog 2015-01-05 23:59:30.0 +0100 +++ debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/changelog 2015-01-29 10:35:32.0 +0100 @@ -1,53 +1,23 @@ -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u2.b4) wheezy; urgency=low +debian-installer-netboot-images (20150107) unstable; urgency=low - * Update to 20130613+deb7u2+b4 images, from proposed-updates. + * Update to 20150107 images. - -- Adam D. Barratt Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:23:44 + + [ Dmitrijs Ledkovs ] + * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u2.b3) wheezy; urgency=low + [ Didier Raboud ] + * Update architectures' list, distribution codename and major version +for Jessie (Closes: #766960) + * Add a kfreebsd netboot directory postfix special-case + * Add new matching lintian overrides + * Move to one-digit versioning, aka from '-7.0-' to '-8-' - * Update to 20130613+deb7u2+b3 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:08:24 +0100 - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u2.b2) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u2+b2 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Thu, 10 Jul 2014 05:44:50 +0100 - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u2.b1) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u2+b1 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:17:24 +0100 - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u1.b2) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u1+b2 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:24:42 + - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u1.b1) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u1+b1 images, from proposed-updates. - - -- Adam D. Barratt Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:03:39 + - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613+deb7u1 images, from wheezy-proposed-updates. + [ Cyril Brulebois ] * Update README to document fancy .bN suffix for d-i-n-i when d-i has +bN. * Add a check in get-images.sh to detect wrong binNMU versioning. - -- Cyril Brulebois Fri, 11 Oct 2013 01:10:36 +0200 - -debian-installer-netboot-images (20130613) wheezy; urgency=low - - * Update to 20130613 images, from wheezy-proposed-updates. - - -- Cyril Brulebois Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:48:42 +0200 + -- Didier Raboud Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:34:48 +0100 debian-installer-netboot-images (20130430) unstable; urgency=low diff -Nru debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/compat debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/compat --- debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/compat 2014-07-09 23:31:41.0 +0200 +++ debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/compat 2014-08-28 20:29:50.0 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -7 +9 diff -Nru debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/control debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/control --- debian-installer-netboot-images-20130613+deb7u2.b4/debian/control 2014-10-13 20:01:17.0 +0200 +++ debian-installer-netboot-images-20150107/debian/control 2015-01-29 10:35:51.0 +0100 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Priority: optio
