Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:32:25PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > The problem is, most Debian systems are set up to mount the core file
> > systems with "relatime".  This means you don't have a record of the
> > last time each file was accessed, so you can't ask the computer which
> > files were most recently opened.
> 
>   i don't have that one set at all in my fstab.

It's a default option.  It doesn't have to be visible in fstab.
Look at the *output of mount* instead.

unicorn:~$ cat /etc/fstab
[...]
# / was on /dev/sda7 during installation
UUID=c4691ccb-2090-491e-8e82-d7cc822db04a /   ext4
errors=remount-ro 0   1
[...]

unicorn:~$ mount | grep 'on / '
/dev/sda7 on / type ext4 (rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro)



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread songbird
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:21:11PM -0400, songbird wrote:
>> Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
>> ...
>> > That triggered yet another thought: What about some kind of a file
>> > search that narrows down "Last Accessed" data for all the various
>> > sound file types?
>> 
>>   most recently accessed files could be located via find
>> command.  i assumed Gene would know how to do that...
>
> The problem is, most Debian systems are set up to mount the core file
> systems with "relatime".  This means you don't have a record of the
> last time each file was accessed, so you can't ask the computer which
> files were most recently opened.

  i don't have that one set at all in my fstab.


> At that point, Gene's knowledge (or lack thereof) isn't relevant.

  can't say...


  songbird



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 04:02:03AM +0100, mick.crane wrote:
> On 2023-08-28 08:29, gene heskett wrote:
> > Somewhere, for some unk reason, there is a sound file file that plays
> > at max volume, usually around 2 AM or slightly later, that is very
> > similar to the 40 yo doorbell in this house. A bing-bong sound that
> > differs from the real doorbell by maybe 5hz in pitch. Wakes me up,
> > spoiling a good nights sleep, maybe a dozen times a year an apparently
> > random dates.
> > 
> As this happens when you are asleep it could be in your head.
> You'd need to have a sound activated recorder on for a year to find out.

It would be easier to set up cron jobs that mute the outgoing audio
channels at bed time, and unmute them at wake-up time.

Of course, figuring out which of your desktop environment's features
is doing this, and stopping it, would be greatly preferred.  And let's
face it, this is almost 100% guaranteed to be some kind of DE alarm
clock feature or something similar.

I'm inclined to think that it actually happens *every* night, but it
only wakes him up a few times a year.  But that's a guess.



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread mick.crane

On 2023-08-28 08:29, gene heskett wrote:

Greetings;

odd request:

Somewhere, for some unk reason, there is a sound file file that plays
at max volume, usually around 2 AM or slightly later, that is very
similar to the 40 yo doorbell in this house. A bing-bong sound that
differs from the real doorbell by maybe 5hz in pitch. Wakes me up,
spoiling a good nights sleep, maybe a dozen times a year an apparently
random dates.


As this happens when you are asleep it could be in your head.
You'd need to have a sound activated recorder on for a year to find out.

mick



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:21:11PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> ...
> > That triggered yet another thought: What about some kind of a file
> > search that narrows down "Last Accessed" data for all the various
> > sound file types?
> 
>   most recently accessed files could be located via find
> command.  i assumed Gene would know how to do that...

The problem is, most Debian systems are set up to mount the core file
systems with "relatime".  This means you don't have a record of the
last time each file was accessed, so you can't ask the computer which
files were most recently opened.

At that point, Gene's knowledge (or lack thereof) isn't relevant.



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread songbird
Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
...
> That triggered yet another thought: What about some kind of a file
> search that narrows down "Last Accessed" data for all the various
> sound file types?

  most recently accessed files could be located via find
command.  i assumed Gene would know how to do that...


> Personal experience is that manually viewing e.g. /usr/share isn't
> 100% perfect. It's been a couple years, but I've also seen sound files
> stored more locally within some given package's own parent/child file
> hierarchy. That helps make our favorite file search programs
> priceless.
>
> Cindy :)

  if the system can't tell you what's been recently 
accessed and you are on-line then you need to go
off-line until you've figured it out.

  if Gene leaves his network up and accessible to
others all night when he's sleeping then perhaps he
needs to bring it down and that will slay the 
gremlins...


  songbird



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread fxkl47BF
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:

> On 8/28/23, songbird  wrote:
>> gene heskett wrote:
>>> Greetings;
>>>
>>> odd request:
>>>
>>> Somewhere, for some unk reason, there is a sound file file that plays at
>>> max volume, usually around 2 AM or slightly later, that is very similar
>>> to the 40 yo doorbell in this house. A bing-bong sound that differs from
>>> the real doorbell by maybe 5hz in pitch. Wakes me up, spoiling a good
>>> nights sleep, maybe a dozen times a year an apparently random dates.

have you checked your browser history
in my house gremlins love surf in those early hours :)



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
On 8/28/23, songbird  wrote:
> gene heskett wrote:
>> Greetings;
>>
>> odd request:
>>
>> Somewhere, for some unk reason, there is a sound file file that plays at
>> max volume, usually around 2 AM or slightly later, that is very similar
>> to the 40 yo doorbell in this house. A bing-bong sound that differs from
>> the real doorbell by maybe 5hz in pitch. Wakes me up, spoiling a good
>> nights sleep, maybe a dozen times a year an apparently random dates.


>   perhaps a desktop sound?  i hate noises so i turn them
> off.
>
>   see if you have any enabled and if so check them all to see
> what they sound like.

That's a good one. It triggered the thought that pavucontrol(-qt)
sometimes will rat out what is playing any given sound. I see it most
often with browser tabs. Pavucontrol will name the title of the tab
that's presenting sound.

Just tried pavucontrol-qt for alarm-clock-applet, too. It says,"Alarm
Clock : Playback Stream."


>   if a file does not have an extension you can still use the
> file command to see if it can figure out what it is.


I just tried a "locate" search for "bell" and "door" on my setup.
There were "a few" files returned, but they were visibly searchable
fairly quickly.

That triggered yet another thought: What about some kind of a file
search that narrows down "Last Accessed" data for all the various
sound file types?

Personal experience is that manually viewing e.g. /usr/share isn't
100% perfect. It's been a couple years, but I've also seen sound files
stored more locally within some given package's own parent/child file
hierarchy. That helps make our favorite file search programs
priceless.

Cindy :)
-- 
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
* runs with birdseed *



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread songbird
gene heskett wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> odd request:
>
> Somewhere, for some unk reason, there is a sound file file that plays at 
> max volume, usually around 2 AM or slightly later, that is very similar 
> to the 40 yo doorbell in this house. A bing-bong sound that differs from 
> the real doorbell by maybe 5hz in pitch. Wakes me up, spoiling a good 
> nights sleep, maybe a dozen times a year an apparently random dates.
>
> To aid in finding it, what extension might that file be carrying to 
> indicate its a .snd fle, which according to grep on ls -lR's output, 
> does not exist in the thousands of files under hundreds of random names.
>
> This file that sounds exactly like my doorbell has existed on my 
> 24/7/365.25 on main system for at least 20 years. I'd like to A. find 
> it, B. find what condition uses it, fix the condition, or even delete it.
>
> How can I best do that? updatedb, followed by locate door or locate bell 
> reports nothing.
>
> There are now 2 different PIR based devices watching that doorbell 
> button, which trigger on the neighbors cat walking by but remain silent 
> when this sound jacks me up in the middle of the night.
>
> Any help in finding this will be hugely appreciated.

  perhaps a desktop sound?  i hate noises so i turn them
off.

  see if you have any enabled and if so check them all to see 
what they sound like.

  if a file does not have an extension you can still use the
file command to see if it can figure out what it is.


  good luck,


  songbird



Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

2023-08-28 Thread zithro

On 28 Aug 2023 21:26, Mario Marietto wrote:

Anyway,I found it relevant that I have the error with the wi-fi driver in
debian,but not with devuan.

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:19 PM Mario Marietto 
wrote:


Yes.thanks. I've already asked there. The author is busy with different
projects,so I tried to look for some help from different sources or the
thing will take too long a time.

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:40 PM zithro  wrote:


On 28 Aug 2023 19:00, Christian Britz wrote:

On 28.08.23, 18:44, zithro wrote:

On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote:

$ uname -a
Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe
#8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux


Is it normal to get this "old" kernel on bookworm ARM ? No 6.x

versions ?


This does not seem to be a Debian kernel at all. I get this on my
Raspberry Pi running bookworm:

$ uname -a
Linux raspberrypi 6.1.0-11-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 6.1.38-4 (2023-08-08)
aarch64 GNU/Linux



Yes, in another post today, the OP wrote he was using :


https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases/download/230220-01/chromebook_snow-armv7l-bookworm.img.gz

The other post is about a kernel wifi driver misbehaving (mwifiex_sdio
...).

So I guess support should be asked there. There may be many differences
between OP's image and a standard Debian.



A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

Also, you don't need to reply to me, reply to the list instead.
It means the "To:" field should use "debian-user@lists.debian.org".


As per your question :

> Anyway,I found it relevant that I have the error with the wi-fi driver in
> debian,but not with devuan.

Do you know the exact differences between the Debian and Devuan images 
provided ?

You should check the kernel and driver versions in the two systems.


--
++
zithro / Cyril



Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

2023-08-28 Thread Mario Marietto
Anyway,I found it relevant that I have the error with the wi-fi driver in
debian,but not with devuan.

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:19 PM Mario Marietto 
wrote:

> Yes.thanks. I've already asked there. The author is busy with different
> projects,so I tried to look for some help from different sources or the
> thing will take too long a time.
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:40 PM zithro  wrote:
>
>> On 28 Aug 2023 19:00, Christian Britz wrote:
>> > On 28.08.23, 18:44, zithro wrote:
>> >> On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote:
>> >>> $ uname -a
>> >>> Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe
>> >>> #8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux
>> >>
>> >> Is it normal to get this "old" kernel on bookworm ARM ? No 6.x
>> versions ?
>> >
>> > This does not seem to be a Debian kernel at all. I get this on my
>> > Raspberry Pi running bookworm:
>> >
>> > $ uname -a
>> > Linux raspberrypi 6.1.0-11-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 6.1.38-4 (2023-08-08)
>> > aarch64 GNU/Linux
>> >
>>
>> Yes, in another post today, the OP wrote he was using :
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases/download/230220-01/chromebook_snow-armv7l-bookworm.img.gz
>>
>> The other post is about a kernel wifi driver misbehaving (mwifiex_sdio
>> ...).
>>
>> So I guess support should be asked there. There may be many differences
>> between OP's image and a standard Debian.
>>
>> --
>> ++
>> zithro / Cyril
>>
>>
>
> --
> Mario.
>


-- 
Mario.


Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

2023-08-28 Thread Mario Marietto
Yes.thanks. I've already asked there. The author is busy with different
projects,so I tried to look for some help from different sources or the
thing will take too long a time.

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:40 PM zithro  wrote:

> On 28 Aug 2023 19:00, Christian Britz wrote:
> > On 28.08.23, 18:44, zithro wrote:
> >> On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote:
> >>> $ uname -a
> >>> Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe
> >>> #8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux
> >>
> >> Is it normal to get this "old" kernel on bookworm ARM ? No 6.x versions
> ?
> >
> > This does not seem to be a Debian kernel at all. I get this on my
> > Raspberry Pi running bookworm:
> >
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux raspberrypi 6.1.0-11-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 6.1.38-4 (2023-08-08)
> > aarch64 GNU/Linux
> >
>
> Yes, in another post today, the OP wrote he was using :
>
>
> https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases/download/230220-01/chromebook_snow-armv7l-bookworm.img.gz
>
> The other post is about a kernel wifi driver misbehaving (mwifiex_sdio
> ...).
>
> So I guess support should be asked there. There may be many differences
> between OP's image and a standard Debian.
>
> --
> ++
> zithro / Cyril
>
>

-- 
Mario.


Re: Please verify Gnome and KDE wiki articles for correctness

2023-08-28 Thread Luna Jernberg
It got delayed a year however:
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2023/08/ubuntu-23-10-wont-use-cups-snap

Den fre 25 aug. 2023 kl 19:27 skrev Jeffrey Walton :
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> A popular Debian-derived distro is preparing to change some printing
> components from *.deb packages to Snapd. That is going to cause
> trouble for users who remove Snapd, and still use *.deb packages. I
> expect some users will want to move from the other distro to Debian.
>
> Two of the wiki articles that will help with a migration to Debian are
>  and .
>
> It would be helpful if folks with Gnome and KDE experience would look
> over the articles and provide corrections and updates.
>
> Jeff
>



Re: Not authorized to run synaptic

2023-08-28 Thread Joe
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 13:32:16 -0300
Bruno Schneider  wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I'm running Debian Testing, using XFCE. I run synaptic package manager
> from a launcher I made a few years ago. After a system upgrade today,
> I can no longer run synaptic from the launcher.
> 
> Using the command line (same command as the launcher), I got this:
> 
> $ /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec
> Error executing command as another user: Not authorized
> This incident has been reported.
> 
> If I use sudo, then it works, but pkexec used to open a graphical
> password input to run synaptic as root, which is what I want, for
> opening it using the launcher. What did I break?
> 

It's not obvious. I run synaptic from a standard menu launcher, where
the command is just synaptic-pkexec. It then requests the root password
before running. I'm on sid, which still ought to be very close to
testing at the moment.

-- 
Joe



Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

2023-08-28 Thread Mario Marietto
Sure. It's debian. Uname -a for me is different because I have recompiled
the kernel several times. And I can't use 6 on this old netbook if I want
to enable kvm. The latest version supported is 5.7. Higher than this qemu
will not be recognized by kvm anymore. No problem if you don't want to use
kvm ; you can even use 6.x. The image that I've used there is the 6.x
onboard,but I have recompiled 5.4.

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 7:10 PM Christian Britz  wrote:

> On 28.08.23, 18:44, zithro wrote:
> > On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote:
> >> $ uname -a
> >> Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe
> >> #8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux
> >
> > Is it normal to get this "old" kernel on bookworm ARM ? No 6.x versions ?
>
> This does not seem to be a Debian kernel at all. I get this on my
> Raspberry Pi running bookworm:
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux raspberrypi 6.1.0-11-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 6.1.38-4 (2023-08-08)
> aarch64 GNU/Linux
>
> --
> https://www.cb-fraggle.de
>
>

-- 
Mario.


Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

2023-08-28 Thread zithro

On 28 Aug 2023 19:00, Christian Britz wrote:

On 28.08.23, 18:44, zithro wrote:

On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote:

$ uname -a
Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe
#8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux


Is it normal to get this "old" kernel on bookworm ARM ? No 6.x versions ?


This does not seem to be a Debian kernel at all. I get this on my
Raspberry Pi running bookworm:

$ uname -a
Linux raspberrypi 6.1.0-11-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 6.1.38-4 (2023-08-08)
aarch64 GNU/Linux



Yes, in another post today, the OP wrote he was using :

https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases/download/230220-01/chromebook_snow-armv7l-bookworm.img.gz

The other post is about a kernel wifi driver misbehaving (mwifiex_sdio ...).

So I guess support should be asked there. There may be many differences 
between OP's image and a standard Debian.


--
++
zithro / Cyril



Re: Not authorized to run synaptic

2023-08-28 Thread zithro

On 28 Aug 2023 18:32, Bruno Schneider wrote:

Hi all,

I'm running Debian Testing, using XFCE. I run synaptic package manager
from a launcher I made a few years ago. After a system upgrade today,
I can no longer run synaptic from the launcher.

Using the command line (same command as the launcher), I got this:

 $ /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec
 Error executing command as another user: Not authorized
 This incident has been reported.

If I use sudo, then it works, but pkexec used to open a graphical
password input to run synaptic as root, which is what I want, for
opening it using the launcher. What did I break?



It seems you are in the sudo group, so pkexec should work.
"/usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec" is a one line shell script, a simple wrapper 
to "pkexec".


As you're using Debian testing:
- was pkexec/policykit upgraded today ?
- what was updated today ?
ie. read the logs in /var/log/apt/*
- did you check the changelog for pkexec ?
$ zcat /usr/share/doc/pkexec/changelog.Debian.gz

Also, the pkexec man page says :

As a result, pkexec will not by default allow
you to run X11 applications as another user since the $DISPLAY
and $XAUTHORITY environment variables are not
set. These two variables will be retained if the
org.freedesktop.policykit.exec.allow_gui annotation on an
action is set to a nonempty value; this is discouraged, though, and
should only be used for legacy programs.


--
++
zithro / Cyril



Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

2023-08-28 Thread Christian Britz
On 28.08.23, 18:44, zithro wrote:
> On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote:
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe
>> #8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux
> 
> Is it normal to get this "old" kernel on bookworm ARM ? No 6.x versions ?

This does not seem to be a Debian kernel at all. I get this on my
Raspberry Pi running bookworm:

$ uname -a
Linux raspberrypi 6.1.0-11-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 6.1.38-4 (2023-08-08)
aarch64 GNU/Linux

-- 
https://www.cb-fraggle.de



Re: Failed to acquire pid file : /var/local/run/libvirt/qemu/driver.pid

2023-08-28 Thread zithro

On 27 Aug 2023 12:09, Mario Marietto wrote:

Hello.

I'm running Debian bookworm on my ARM Chromebook,model "xe303c12" and I've
recompiled the kernel to enable KVM,so now my system sounds like this :


If you are going to use libvirt, you could also try Xen (via packages), 
but I don't know if your device is supported.



$ uname -a
Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe
#8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux


Is it normal to get this "old" kernel on bookworm ARM ? No 6.x versions ?


$ uname -r
5.4.244-stb-cbe


uname -r is already in uname -a (-a == all) ;)


$ qemu-system-arm --version
QEMU emulator version 5.1.0 (v5.1.0-dirty)
Copyright (c) 2003-2020 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers


bookworm x86 uses QEMU v7 (1:7.2+dfsg-7+deb12u1), so same as above, why 
is this old version used ?



I have installed libvirt 9.7.0,qemu 5.1 and virt-manager from source code
with the final goal to be able to connect qemu,kvm and libvirt together to
virtualize FreeBSD 13.2 for arm 32 bit. If you ask me why I've recompiled
everything from source code,my answer will be complicated,but in short
terms,for some unknown reason, it reports an error like this :


libvirt on bookworm is 9.0.0-4


"Warning : Failed to set up UEFI /
The Libvirt version does not support UEFI /
Install options are limited"


Look for this error message, it may be quicker and less error prone than 
compiling everything.



--
++
zithro / Cyril



Not authorized to run synaptic

2023-08-28 Thread Bruno Schneider
Hi all,

I'm running Debian Testing, using XFCE. I run synaptic package manager
from a launcher I made a few years ago. After a system upgrade today,
I can no longer run synaptic from the launcher.

Using the command line (same command as the launcher), I got this:

$ /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec
Error executing command as another user: Not authorized
This incident has been reported.

If I use sudo, then it works, but pkexec used to open a graphical
password input to run synaptic as root, which is what I want, for
opening it using the launcher. What did I break?

-- 
Bruno Schneider



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread zithro

On 28 Aug 2023 09:29, gene heskett wrote:

Greetings;

odd request:


Yeah, almost unreal ^^



Somewhere, for some unk reason, there is a sound file file that plays at 
max volume, usually around 2 AM or slightly later, that is very similar 
to the 40 yo doorbell in this house. A bing-bong sound that differs from 
the real doorbell by maybe 5hz in pitch. Wakes me up, spoiling a good 
nights sleep, maybe a dozen times a year an apparently random dates.


Have you checked all the cron files and the systemd timers ?

To aid in finding it, what extension might that file be carrying to 
indicate its a .snd fle, which according to grep on ls -lR's output, 
does not exist in the thousands of files under hundreds of random names.


What if you didn't use an extension when you created the audio file ?

This file that sounds exactly like my doorbell has existed on my 
24/7/365.25 on main system for at least 20 years. I'd like to A. find 
it, B. find what condition uses it, fix the condition, or even delete it.


Maybe find the script(s) where you use this sound ?
I mean to find HOW you played this sound, ie. with which application.
With ALSA, you could have used "aplay FILE.wav", but you could also have 
used xmms, audacity, VLC, mpv, etc.


How can I best do that? updatedb, followed by locate door or locate bell 
reports nothing.


locate bing ; locate bong ; locate gong ? You wrote the sound was like 
"bing-bong" ^^
In this case, I would recommend to use "find" as root, rather than 
"locate", just to prevent the fact the file could not be indexed by 
updatedb for whatever reason, and as root in case you put the script 
and/or sound in a folder only accessible by root.
PS: last I used locate was on Slackware 13.37, so others may point 
errors in that thinking.


There are now 2 different PIR based devices watching that doorbell 
button, which trigger on the neighbors cat walking by but remain silent 
when this sound jacks me up in the middle of the night.


If you have ennemies, they can use a long stick to ring the bell to 
evade PIR detection ^^




Any help in finding this will be hugely appreciated.

Cheers, Gene Heskett.


--
++
zithro / Cyril



Re: Issue with wayland and firefox

2023-08-28 Thread Henning Follmann
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 12:45:41PM +, elodieluna wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In Debian 12 I can't use both Wayland and Firefox. They both work perfectly 
> well if the other is not used. Which should I choose in my bugreport?
> 
> To give you more details if I use Gnome with Wayland Firefox just displays a 
> black window. I then have to wait for about 10s until I can start it again, 
> this time with no issue. If Iuse Xorg for my Gnome session then this problem 
> never happens.
> This issue doesn't happen if I use Chromium instead of Firefox but I like 
> Firefox better.
> 
> I never had this issue with Debian 8 to 11 but experience it Debian SID for 
> the record.
> 

Sorry,
I cannot reproduce this issue

**
henning@oppenheimer:~$ loginctl show-session 2 -p Type
Type=wayland

and firefox works fine.

In this case it is firefox-esr if that makes any difference.


-H

-- 
Henning Follmann   | hfollm...@itcfollmann.com



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread ghe2001
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256







--- Original Message ---
On Monday, August 28th, 2023 at 1:47 AM, jeremy ardley 
 wrote:


> On 28/8/23 15:29, gene heskett wrote:
> 
> > what extension might that file be carrying to indicate its a .snd fle
> 
> 
> Try
> 
> 
> .wav

I use .flac a lot.

> .mp3
> 
...

--
Glenn English

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: ProtonMail

wsBzBAEBCAAnBYJk7L5UCZCf14YxgqyMMhYhBCyicw9CUnAlY0ANl5/XhjGC
rIwyAABmDAgAucbolCPMqKH9qDMeXjf3mgx+t7O3ytzgR0YrXfRJRdQpfzdM
xVjpEiV5++F1rjYQZlJNiVFs88y/k1LM4ZUWsoyhNjAiUl6E3VICeTmSbrnn
33N9SZlslcJMyMqc4S9Zg8rjPJUhmTlc425QXt2fi1E/WXQDYiW1SOwUbQLX
HUY5Xsx+3jaWJeYATqHNJwuJxKKltbT1Wvu8Nm9UOAiymnefgO8si1BDVLy4
PoXz2RqAp0D8pmIjxQFnUltVWDObwBSvpP5EUB8AsXdpebh1bcOIlHkEbH2C
lo/hg3vvnjgyM/vEE3d38sJqoc6VZiL2AVtW4IR3uZl3agvzx98RCg==
=MhI7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: CMD_RESP: cmd 0x23f error, result=0x2 on your image Debian Bookworm for the ARM Chromebook.

2023-08-28 Thread Mario Marietto
Hello.

I'm playing with my old ARM Chromebook,model xe303c12. I've recompiled the
kernel to enable KVM,such as qemu 5.1 and libvirt from source code because
I want to virtualize FreeBSD 13.2 arm 32 bit. As default OS I've installed
Debian 12. So now my system sounds like this :

$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Release:12
Codename:   bookworm

$ uname -a
Linux chromarietto 5.4.244-stb-cbe
#8 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 19 22:19:32 UTC 2023 armv7l GNU/Linux

$ uname -r
5.4.244-stb-cbe

$ kvm-ok
INFO: /dev/kvm exists
KVM acceleration can be used

$ qemu-system-arm --version
QEMU emulator version 5.1.0 (v5.1.0-dirty)
Copyright (c) 2003-2020 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers

$ python3 --version
Python 3.11.2

on my last experiment I've switched from Devuan 4 to Debian
bookworm,"burning" this image file to the sd card :


https://github.com/hexdump0815/imagebuilder/releases/download/230220-01/chromebook_snow-armv7l-bookworm.img.gz



I'm using it right now,but some huge errors are destroying my system files
reboot after reboot,because they are produced at a regular intervals :


[   10.480204] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: info: FW download over, size
533976 bytes
[   10.719132] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: WLAN FW is active
[   10.719369] Bluetooth: vendor=0x2df, device=0x912a, class=255, fn=2
[   11.089624] btmrvl_sdio mmc2:0001:2: sdio device tree data not available
[   11.091551] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: CMD_RESP: cmd 0x242 error, result=0x2
[   11.091563] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: mwifiex_process_cmdresp: cmd
0x242 failed during initialization
[   11.133736] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: info: MWIFIEX VERSION:
mwifiex 1.0 (14.68.29.p59)
[   11.135281] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: driver_version = mwifiex 1.0
(14.68.29.p59)
[   12.914015] NET: Registered protocol family 38
[   19.058217] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: info: trying to associate to
'ziomario' bssid
[   19.093260] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: info: associated to bssid  successfully
[   19.116924] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: CMD_RESP: cmd 0x23f error, result=0x2
[   19.129679] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): mlan0: link becomes ready
[   19.134791] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: CMD_RESP: cmd 0x23f error, result=0x2
[   31.849443] TPS65090_RAILSDCDC1: disabling
[   31.858024] TPS65090_RAILSDCDC2: disabling
[   31.868245] TPS65090_RAILSDCDC3: disabling
[   31.878250] TPS65090_RAILSLDO1: disabling
[   31.887352] TPS65090_RAILSLDO2: disabling
[  115.862293] mwifiex_sdio mmc2:0001:1: CMD_RESP: cmd 0x23f error, result=0x2


If I don't get wrong,it is the wireless driver that has been added to the
system that's causing the problem,right ? or maybe it is incompatible with
the Debian 12 ?

Let me know please. I don't want to return to Devuan because libvirt is
easier to configure on Debian. But take in consideration that those errors
don't happen on Devuan.
-- 
Mario.


Issue with wayland and firefox

2023-08-28 Thread elodieluna
Hello,

In Debian 12 I can't use both Wayland and Firefox. They both work perfectly 
well if the other is not used. Which should I choose in my bugreport?

To give you more details if I use Gnome with Wayland Firefox just displays a 
black window. I then have to wait for about 10s until I can start it again, 
this time with no issue. If Iuse Xorg for my Gnome session then this problem 
never happens.
This issue doesn't happen if I use Chromium instead of Firefox but I like 
Firefox better.

I never had this issue with Debian 8 to 11 but experience it Debian SID for the 
record.

Thanks for your help.

Re: AW: Debugging initramfs, server hangs during boot process

2023-08-28 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2023-08-28, thah...@t-online.de wrote:

> It hangs in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-top/udev
>
> The 2nd last udev call hangs my box
> udevadm trigger --type=devices --action=add

Perhaps add before
udevadm trigger --verbose --dry-run --type=devices --action=add



Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2023-08-28, gene heskett wrote:

> Any help in finding this will be hugely appreciated.

As you are awake and know the time of ringing do you check the logs
around that time ?



Bug? Latest kernel 6.1.0-11-686 needs edd=off

2023-08-28 Thread Hans
Hi folks,

I discovered an issue on my ASUS EEEPC 1005HPX with the latest kernel in 
bookworm.

This is a known issue:

When I boot, then the kernel hangs and it looks for me, that it is probing for 
edd. However, this issue is not every time, but from time to time it hangs 
over minutes or does not start at all.

The tricky trick is to set "edd=off" as kernel adding.

I am not sure, but it might to remeber, that the ASUS Netbook has some 
Biosdrive added used by WindowsXP at that time. This can not be deactivated as 
there is no option in the BIOS settings, so it might be hardcoded in the BIOS.

The reason, why I am telling this is, that all former kernels did not show 
this issue, the only one is the actual kernel in bookworm. Maybe this is a 
bug? I am thinking of a buggy timeout error or, if there is no EDD, then it 
tries again and again. This issue appeared only on my ASUS EEEPC, on all other 
of my computers it is working fine.

As I already said: I found a working solution, but if someone can confirm this 
is a real bug, maybe we should inform the developers?

Thanks for reading this, and if it is no bug, then sorry for the noise.

Have a nice week!

Best 

Hans 







Re: door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread jeremy ardley



On 28/8/23 15:29, gene heskett wrote:

what extension might that file be carrying to indicate its a .snd fle


Try


.wav

.mp3

.aac

.oga

 .m4a

 .ogg

.m4b

 .opus

 .ra

 .rm

.mid

 .midi

 .ac3

 .dts



door bell like sound effect

2023-08-28 Thread gene heskett

Greetings;

odd request:

Somewhere, for some unk reason, there is a sound file file that plays at 
max volume, usually around 2 AM or slightly later, that is very similar 
to the 40 yo doorbell in this house. A bing-bong sound that differs from 
the real doorbell by maybe 5hz in pitch. Wakes me up, spoiling a good 
nights sleep, maybe a dozen times a year an apparently random dates.


To aid in finding it, what extension might that file be carrying to 
indicate its a .snd fle, which according to grep on ls -lR's output, 
does not exist in the thousands of files under hundreds of random names.


This file that sounds exactly like my doorbell has existed on my 
24/7/365.25 on main system for at least 20 years. I'd like to A. find 
it, B. find what condition uses it, fix the condition, or even delete it.


How can I best do that? updatedb, followed by locate door or locate bell 
reports nothing.


There are now 2 different PIR based devices watching that doorbell 
button, which trigger on the neighbors cat walking by but remain silent 
when this sound jacks me up in the middle of the night.


Any help in finding this will be hugely appreciated.

Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 



Re: Re: new Etch install fails to boot

2023-08-28 Thread nazli dollah
Thank you for your help.