Re: Bug report

2011-10-03 Thread Erwan David
On 03/10/11 18:39, lina wrote:
> Just curious, 
> 
> do I need to file a bug report cause the dependency of fglrx drive and 
> xserver? 
> 
> I guess they notice, so they removed fglrx driver from testing. 
> 
> How do people survive without fglrx driver. 
> 
> I failed to downgrade the xserver, so I degraded myself watching films lots. 
> Feel terribly bad at the end of day. 
> 
> I feel tomorrow can't pass like this way.  
> I'm kind of rely on this computer, just so familiar with it.  The desktop not 
> armed to work. And I don't want to use it to work. 
> 
> Thanks for any suggestions. 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Lina
> 

I just refuse xorg upgrade until I can keep fglrx, which I need for dual
screen configuration.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e89e893.1010...@rail.eu.org



Re: Bug filling

2011-09-29 Thread Bob Proulx
Mark Panen wrote:
> I tried to file a bug with "reportbug" in text mode, i got to a screen
> where it wanted to save a file to /tmp/*. One of the options was to
> press "M-G" how do i do that.

Reportbug launches an editor for you edit your report.  I do not
recall any meta-commands from reportbug but it is possible this came
from the editor.  I think very likely the editor was talking to you at
that moment.

(Many people will think Emacs here bug M-G is not an emacs command
that would be asked for in this context.  So I am thinking it is
another editor.)

If you are having difficulty with the editor you were using then you
may choose a different one.  Either by setting the EDITOR variable or
by passing in the --editor command line option argument.

  reportbug --editor=nano

> I Ctrl X and was at a screen where it said it would send the report
> but i am unsure i have sent the bug report.

Reportbug should have given you a prompt similar to this:

  Submit this report on foo (e to edit) [Y|n|a|c|e|i|l|m|p|q|d|t|s|?]?

Typing Y at that prompt would have sent the email and submitted the
bug report.  The BTS would then have sent you back an email
confirmation.  Wait for it.  It frequently takes a bit of time.
Usually within an hour but you might have to wait as long as a day if
there is a problem.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug filling

2011-09-29 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi,

> > Actually, from what I was told, many keyboards have that Meta key - it is
> > usually labelled with a Windows logo.
> 
> I thought the Windows logo key was usually the SUPER key?
Uh... I don't know. Qt and KDE call it "Meta". E.g. my shortcut to lock the 
screen is "Meta+L", windows key plus L.
Maybe it is both?

Kind regards,
Ralf


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201109291909.34743.ralfjun...@gmx.de



Re: Bug filling

2011-09-29 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:07:51PM +0200, Ralf Jung wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > M-G is usually short for "Meta-G", or "Meta+G". Meta is one of those
> > keys that makes sense from a software point of view, but almost no-one
> > has one on their keyboard. It will be emulated in one of two ways;
> > either hold down "Alt", press "g", then release "Alt" or press "Esc",
> > then within a couple of seconds press "g".
> > 
> > You may also be interested to learn that "^G" is a similar shorthand for
> > Ctrl+G.
> Actually, from what I was told, many keyboards have that Meta key - it is 
> usually labelled with a Windows logo.

I thought the Windows logo key was usually the SUPER key?


-- 
Darac Marjal


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug filling

2011-09-29 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi,

> M-G is usually short for "Meta-G", or "Meta+G". Meta is one of those
> keys that makes sense from a software point of view, but almost no-one
> has one on their keyboard. It will be emulated in one of two ways;
> either hold down "Alt", press "g", then release "Alt" or press "Esc",
> then within a couple of seconds press "g".
> 
> You may also be interested to learn that "^G" is a similar shorthand for
> Ctrl+G.
Actually, from what I was told, many keyboards have that Meta key - it is 
usually labelled with a Windows logo.

Kind regards,
Ralf


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201109291807.51648.ralfjun...@gmx.de



Re: Bug filling

2011-09-29 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:21:46AM +0200, Mark Panen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I tried to file a bug with "reportbug" in text mode, i got to a screen
> where it wanted to save a file to /tmp/*. One of the options was to
> press "M-G" how do i do that.

M-G is usually short for "Meta-G", or "Meta+G". Meta is one of those
keys that makes sense from a software point of view, but almost no-one
has one on their keyboard. It will be emulated in one of two ways;
either hold down "Alt", press "g", then release "Alt" or press "Esc",
then within a couple of seconds press "g".

You may also be interested to learn that "^G" is a similar shorthand for
Ctrl+G.


-- 
Darac Marjal


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug filling

2011-09-29 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:21:46 +0200, Mark Panen wrote:

> I tried to file a bug with "reportbug" in text mode, i got to a screen
> where it wanted to save a file to /tmp/*. One of the options was to
> press "M-G" how do i do that.

M+G?

Could be... but true is that I don't remember that exact key combination 
to record the report :-?

> I Ctrl X and was at a screen where it said it would send the report but
> i am unsure i have sent the bug report.

If you finally reported the bug successfully you should have received a 
confirmation message from BTS indicating the bug number assigned to your 
report. If not, then the report was not sent you will have to retry.

> GUI mode crashes so i uninstalled it.

It often does (crashing), I also reverted to the text based wizard.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.09.29.14.10...@gmail.com



Re: Bug report - which package, what severity?

2011-09-18 Thread Mahesh T Pai
Chris Barnard  writes:

 > from grub there is a message regarding a memory conflict and after a
 > few more messages the screen goes to random noise: all TTYS.  There is


Please try the "Recovery mode" from grub. 



Just hit the down arrow once to enter the 2nd option in Grub.

The "Grub terminal" is required when Grub install has botched up
something.

If you get some scrolling messages, after BIOS POST, chances are that
your graphics card has some problems.

Is there a /var/logs/Xorg.0.log file? Any hints in there? 



-- 
Mahesh T. Pai   ||
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge."
--Stephen hawking


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ipoqf5b8.fsf@nandini.localhost



Re: Bug in Debian installer

2011-09-14 Thread Bob Proulx
sppmg wrote:
> 於 2011年09月14日 02:45, Bob Proulx 提到:
> > spp mg wrote:
> >> I install Debian(6.0.2.1 amd64) to a old HDD.This HDD has a lvm
> >> partition,it's creat by Fedora installer.
> >> I can't delete this lvm partition in intaller,it's display about "lvm
> >> is busy..." ,even if I delete all Logical Volume and restart
> >> installer.

I am unable to recreate your issue.  That does not mean you have not
found a problem.  It means that I cannot reproduce your problem.  It
works okay for me.

If I have an existing LVM configuration I am presented with a dialog
screen saying that there is an existing LVM configuration which is
about to be removed.  "Remove existing logical volume data?"
Selecting "" removes it.

> Now,I want delete lvm(vda5),but it display "partition in use" .So I
> enter "Configure the Logical Volume Manager" this entry,and delete all
> volume group.But it still display "partition in use",even if I restart
> installer.

I am sorry but I am unable to recreate this problem.  I do not see
that behavior.

This is the debian-user mailing list.  You probably should take this
problem directly to the debian-installer people.  They have the domain
knowledge for the problem.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug in Debian installer

2011-09-14 Thread sppmg
於 2011年09月14日 02:45, Bob Proulx 提到:
> spp mg wrote:
>> I install Debian(6.0.2.1 amd64) to a old HDD.This HDD has a lvm
>> partition,it's creat by Fedora installer.
>> I can't delete this lvm partition in intaller,it's display about "lvm
>> is busy..." ,even if I delete all Logical Volume and restart
>> installer.
>>
>> Finally, I delete lvm partition by other PC.
>>
>> It's a bug ,right?
> It sounds like it automatically started the lvm subsystem due to the
> presence of the lvm partitions.
>
> Does it give you the option to Configure LVM?  I believe it should.
> If so then you can go into that menu and delete the lvm configuration
> there.
>
> Bob
Hi,It has "Configure the Logical Volume Manager",but it only has "delete
volume group"

I playback this problem in my virtual machine.
First,choose "Guided partitioning" in "partition disk" step .
Now,my disk partition look like this:
--
LVM LG debian, LV root - 20.3 GB Linux device-mapper (linear)
#1 20.3 GB f ext3 /
LVM LG debian, LV swap_1 - 914.4 MB Linux device-mapper (linear)
#1 914.4 MB f swap swap
Virtual disk 1 (vda) - 21.5GB Virtio Block Device
#1 primary 254 MB B f ext2 /boot
#5 logical 21.2 GB k lvm
--
Now,I want delete lvm(vda5),but it display "partition in use" .So I
enter "Configure the Logical Volume Manager" this entry,and delete all
volume group.But it still display "partition in use",even if I restart
installer.

I know a only way can use this PC to solve problem.
Enter the shell and use fdisk to delete lvm partition(vda5),and return
"partition disk" step.
But,this way is dirty,I think.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e708366.3030...@gmail.com



Re: Bug in Debian installer

2011-09-13 Thread Bob Proulx
spp mg wrote:
> I install Debian(6.0.2.1 amd64) to a old HDD.This HDD has a lvm
> partition,it's creat by Fedora installer.
> I can't delete this lvm partition in intaller,it's display about "lvm
> is busy..." ,even if I delete all Logical Volume and restart
> installer.
> 
> Finally, I delete lvm partition by other PC.
> 
> It's a bug ,right?

It sounds like it automatically started the lvm subsystem due to the
presence of the lvm partitions.

Does it give you the option to Configure LVM?  I believe it should.
If so then you can go into that menu and delete the lvm configuration
there.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#636123: linux-image-2.6.39 not booting due to older package (not in list of dependencies!)

2011-08-02 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:05:05PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636123
> 
> there's a rather complex set of interdependencies between
> linux-image-2.6.39, libdevmapper, initramfs-tools and LVM that has
> resulted in a system which last had 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 installed (and
> associated packages) failing to boot when the latest 2.6.39 kernel was
> installed.  the root filesystem is on an LVM partition.
> 
> the error that occurred will be familiar to anyone who has done kernel
> development especially embedded linux development: unable to find root
> filesystem, after only about 5-10 lines of kernel messages.  it's
> incredibly early on in the boot process, and is probably in the
> initial ramdisk stuff, when looking for (duh) the root filesystem.
> 
> the *only* thing that was installed, which resulted in the boot
> failure, was the linux 2.6.39 kernel.  this, obviously, triggered an
> initrd build (but not of the 2.6.32 one, i don't recall seeing that:
> could be wrong though).
> 
> now, i've discussed this on the bugtracker and there clearly isn't -
> and really shouldn't be - a listed debian dependency between
> linux-image-2.6.39 kernel and a userspace library.  however, there
> clearly *is* a dependency because "It Don't Wurk (tm)".
> 
> so the issue is: how the bloody hell should this clear dependency be
> expressed in "Debian Dependency" terms, such that nobody else runs
> smack into this same issue?
> 
> ben's suggested that there may be something in initramfs-tools that's
> up the creek.  however, i'm having difficulty finding a link (depends,
> rdepends) between libdevmapper and initramfs-tools (which may in fact
> be the issue).
> 
> are there any other ideas on how this may be resolved?

the kernel is racy and before you were just lucky, it scsi is involved use
  scsi_mod.scan=sync

if not use bootparam
  rootdelay=9


known stuff, no need to cry, documented
http://wiki.debian.org/InitramfsDebug


--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110802132028.gr30...@vostochny.stro.at



Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable to canonicalise path"

2011-06-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Steven Sciame  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>From: Selim T. Erdogan 
>>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 8:54 PM
>>Subject: Re: Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable 
>>to canonicalise path"
>>
>>Clive Standbridge, 19.05.2011 tarihinde şöyle yazmış:
>>> > >
>>> > >  I am attempting to upload files onto my webserver using sftp.  As
>>> > >  far as I can
>>> > >  tell from reading the man pages and searching online, the correct
>>> > >  syntax once
>>> > >  connected via sftp is:
>>> > >
>>> > >  put -r *
>>> >
>>> > I'm no expert myself, but shouldn't that be
>>> >
>>> >    mput *
>>>
>>> mput doesn't seem to be an sftp command. Maybe you were thinking of
>>> lftp? But lftp's mput command doesn't appear to do recursion. lftp has
>>> a reverse mirror command "mirror -R" which looks like it will do the
>>> job. You can connect to an sftp server with lftp using a command like
>>> lftp sftp://username@host/path/to/dir
>>>
>>> Another alternative would be to use rsync e.g.
>>> rsync -aiz files username@host:/path/to/dir
>>
>>Yet another alternative might be scp instead of sftp.  I use "scp -pr"
>>often.
>>
>>
>
>
> Thank you for this.  scp works!   I really like the functionality of sftp 
> since I can connect, search for what I want mv things around and then copy 
> what I want.  Hopefully it will be fixed in 6.0.2? but until then thank you 
> for scp!

While sftp and scp have uses for modest upload and downloads, both
suffer from non-specific handling of symlinks, and scp in particular
suffers from its lack of a chroot cage to isolate client access to the
server to simited areas. The result is that a recursive upload, or
download, that includes a recursive symlink can be a *disaster*. They
also suffer from confusing specifcaitons of the associated "TIMEZONE"
of uploads and downloads causing enormous confusion for international
clients, at the worst possible moments.

This sort of thing is why I've encouraged people to use WebDAV over
HTTPS, which is built into Windows network neighborhood, works well
with cadaver and ltfp for command line access, and does a better job
of publishing datestamps for the clients.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/banlktikfes-aewynefwkho-a673zlo5...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable to canonicalise path"

2011-06-09 Thread Steven Sciame
 





>
>From: Selim T. Erdogan 
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 8:54 PM
>Subject: Re: Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable 
>to canonicalise path"
>
>Clive Standbridge, 19.05.2011 tarihinde şöyle yazmış:
>> > >  
>> > >  I am attempting to upload files onto my webserver using sftp.  As
>> > >  far as I can 
>> > >  tell from reading the man pages and searching online, the correct
>> > >  syntax once 
>> > >  connected via sftp is:
>> > >  
>> > >  put -r * 
>> > 
>> > I'm no expert myself, but shouldn't that be
>> > 
>> >    mput *
>> 
>> mput doesn't seem to be an sftp command. Maybe you were thinking of
>> lftp? But lftp's mput command doesn't appear to do recursion. lftp has
>> a reverse mirror command "mirror -R" which looks like it will do the
>> job. You can connect to an sftp server with lftp using a command like
>> lftp sftp://username@host/path/to/dir
>> 
>> Another alternative would be to use rsync e.g.
>> rsync -aiz files username@host:/path/to/dir
>
>Yet another alternative might be scp instead of sftp.  I use "scp -pr" 
>often.
>
>


Thank you for this.  scp works!   I really like the functionality of sftp since 
I can connect, search for what I want mv things around and then copy what I 
want.  Hopefully it will be fixed in 6.0.2? but until then thank you for scp!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/434921.70691...@web111707.mail.gq1.yahoo.com



Re: bug udev avec Wheezy

2011-05-30 Thread William Hopkins
On 05/30/11 at 09:20pm, maderios wrote:
> Bonsoir
> Je ne sais pas si cela vous arrive mais j'ai tenté pour la énième
> fois de revenir à Wheezy et pan, toujours ce problème avec udev qui
> ralentit la machine. Dans le log de boot  on voit qu'il y a un
> problème. Suis je le seul concerné ? J'en doute.. Comment cela se
> passe chez vous ? Existe il une solution ? Merci pour toute info
> PS: udev n'apparaît pas dans le log du boot de Squeeze et la machine
> est "normalement" performante.
> M

This is an english-language list. You want debian-user-french.
(or possibly simply `man reportbug`)


-- 
Liam


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug in bash? different from ksh, at any rate...

2011-05-28 Thread Rick Thomas


On May 28, 2011, at 2:47 AM, David Sastre wrote:


On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:14:42AM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:


Can anybody explain this difference between the behavior of bash and
ksh?

When reading the man page, I would expect both of them to have the
behavior exhibited by ksh.
Why does bash seem to treat "return" like a single level "break" in
this context?

The "echo "$AA" | while read" is important context.  If I change it
to "for i in 0 1", return does as expected.

If it's any help, changing "return" to "break 2" doesn't help.  with
bash, it still gives "1 1 1 1"
while ksh still gives "1"

I wonder if it has anything to do with "while read" causing a
subshell to be created, and bash getting confused about the "return"
inside of a subshell.  If so, it's a bug in bash that ksh gets
right, so it ought to be fixable.


I can't reproduce it:

$ cat strange.sh
function strange {
for j in 0 1 2 3
do
   AA=' 1
2'
   echo "$AA" | while read i
   do
   echo "$i"
   return
   done
done
}
echo $(strange)

$ bash ./strange.sh
1 1 1 1

$ ksh ./strange.sh
1 1 1 1

ii  bash  4.1-3 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  mksh  39.3.20100725-1   MirBSD Korn Shell

--  
Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179  60E7 F79B AB04  
5299 EC56


As noted in other responses to my question, the behavior depends on  
how your particular shell does pipes (with or without generating a  
subshell)  You have the "MirBSD Korn Shell".  I was using the ksh that  
calls itself "The real, AT&T version of the Korn shell" which has  
different behavior.


Thanks for testing!

Rick


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/afc95b26-55d3-4395-847d-57cb8133b...@pobox.com



Re: Bug in bash? different from ksh, at any rate...

2011-05-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-05-28 10:14 +0200, Rick Thomas wrote:

> Can anybody explain this difference between the behavior of bash and
> ksh?

It depends on whether the shell starts a subshell for (compound)
commands in pipelines.

> When reading the man page, I would expect both of them to have the
> behavior exhibited by ksh.
> Why does bash seem to treat "return" like a single level "break" in
> this context?
>
> The "echo "$AA" | while read" is important context.  If I change it to
> "for i in 0 1", return does as expected.

Actually, the pipeline is the most important.  You can achieve the same
with a simpler script:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
strange () {
for j in 0 1 2 3
do
: | { echo 1;return; }
done
}
echo $(strange)
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

> I wonder if it has anything to do with "while read" causing a subshell
> to be created,

Not exactly, it's the pipeline that causes creation of the subshell.

> and bash getting confused about the "return" inside of
> a subshell.

It does not get confused; as you can see, the subshell properly returns.

> If so, it's a bug in bash that ksh gets right, so it
> ought to be fixable.

There is no wrong or right here, since the susv3 specification is rather
vague:

,
| Additionally, each command of a multi-command pipeline is in a subshell
| environment; as an extension, however, any or all commands in a pipeline
| may be executed in the current environment.
`

So bash implements the default, while ksh implements the extension.
Having an option in bash to control the behavior would be nice, however.

See also the following blog entry:
http://backreference.org/2010/10/23/on-pipes-subshells-and-descriptors/.

Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwnzjc0s@turtle.gmx.de



Re: Bug in bash? different from ksh, at any rate...

2011-05-28 Thread David Sastre
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:14:42AM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
> 
> Can anybody explain this difference between the behavior of bash and
> ksh?
> 
> When reading the man page, I would expect both of them to have the
> behavior exhibited by ksh.
> Why does bash seem to treat "return" like a single level "break" in
> this context?
> 
> The "echo "$AA" | while read" is important context.  If I change it
> to "for i in 0 1", return does as expected.
> 
> If it's any help, changing "return" to "break 2" doesn't help.  with
> bash, it still gives "1 1 1 1"
> while ksh still gives "1"
> 
> I wonder if it has anything to do with "while read" causing a
> subshell to be created, and bash getting confused about the "return"
> inside of a subshell.  If so, it's a bug in bash that ksh gets
> right, so it ought to be fixable.

I can't reproduce it:

$ cat strange.sh
function strange {
for j in 0 1 2 3
do
AA=' 1
2'
echo "$AA" | while read i
do
echo "$i"
return
done
done
}
echo $(strange)

$ bash ./strange.sh
1 1 1 1

$ ksh ./strange.sh
1 1 1 1

ii  bash  4.1-3 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  mksh  39.3.20100725-1   MirBSD Korn Shell

-- 
Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179  60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug

2011-05-21 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Sb, 21 mai 11, 16:35:53, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:12:19 +, Amir Sabbaghi wrote:
> 
> > I have two problems with Debain, but I don't know how to report it. 
> 
> Two? I can only glimpse one :-P
> 
> > I have tested Debian 6.0.1a (Squeeze) on my laptop and the first
> > problem I saw was that when Debain entered graphical mode my monitor
> > goes off!! Then I used nomodeset in boot parameters and then I was able
> > to see graphics, but in a low resolution (800x600). can you tell me
> > what is the problem please?
> 
> What VGA chipset has your laptop (ati, nvidia, intel...)?

The output of 'lspci -nn | grep VGA' would be useful. 

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug

2011-05-21 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 21 May 2011 14:12:19 +, Amir Sabbaghi wrote:

> I have two problems with Debain, but I don't know how to report it. 

Two? I can only glimpse one :-P

> I have tested Debian 6.0.1a (Squeeze) on my laptop and the first
> problem I saw was that when Debain entered graphical mode my monitor
> goes off!! Then I used nomodeset in boot parameters and then I was able
> to see graphics, but in a low resolution (800x600). can you tell me
> what is the problem please?

What VGA chipset has your laptop (ati, nvidia, intel...)?

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.05.21.16.35...@gmail.com



Re: Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable to canonicalise path"

2011-05-20 Thread Selim T. Erdogan
Clive Standbridge, 19.05.2011 tarihinde şöyle yazmış:
> > >  
> > >  I am attempting to upload files onto my webserver using sftp.  As
> > >  far as I can 
> > >  tell from reading the man pages and searching online, the correct
> > >  syntax once 
> > >  connected via sftp is:
> > >  
> > >  put -r * 
> > 
> > I'm no expert myself, but shouldn't that be
> > 
> >mput *
> 
> mput doesn't seem to be an sftp command. Maybe you were thinking of
> lftp? But lftp's mput command doesn't appear to do recursion. lftp has
> a reverse mirror command "mirror -R" which looks like it will do the
> job. You can connect to an sftp server with lftp using a command like
> lftp sftp://username@host/path/to/dir
> 
> Another alternative would be to use rsync e.g.
> rsync -aiz files username@host:/path/to/dir

Yet another alternative might be scp instead of sftp.  I use "scp -pr" 
often.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110521015402.ga5...@cs.utexas.edu



Re: Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable to canonicalise path"

2011-05-19 Thread Clive Standbridge
> >  
> >  I am attempting to upload files onto my webserver using sftp.  As
> >  far as I can 
> >  tell from reading the man pages and searching online, the correct
> >  syntax once 
> >  connected via sftp is:
> >  
> >  put -r * 
> 
> I'm no expert myself, but shouldn't that be
> 
>mput *

mput doesn't seem to be an sftp command. Maybe you were thinking of
lftp? But lftp's mput command doesn't appear to do recursion. lftp has
a reverse mirror command "mirror -R" which looks like it will do the
job. You can connect to an sftp server with lftp using a command like
lftp sftp://username@host/path/to/dir

Another alternative would be to use rsync e.g.
rsync -aiz files username@host:/path/to/dir

-- 
Cheers,
Clive


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110519213653.ga10...@rimmer.esmertec.com



Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable to canonicalise path"

2011-05-19 Thread Steven Sciame


 



- Original Message -
> From: David Jardine 
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 3:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable to 
> canonicalise path"
> 
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Steven Sciame wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>   I am attempting to upload files onto my webserver using sftp.  As far as I 
> can 
>>   tell from reading the man pages and searching online, the correct syntax 
> once 
>>   connected via sftp is:
>>   
>>   put -r * 
> 
> I'm no expert myself, but shouldn't that be
> 
>    mput *
> 
> Cheers,
> David
> 
> 

Hi David,

Thank you for the reply.  That is what I thought it should be, so I started 
with mput, just like I would have done with regular ftp.  sftp responded with, 
"Command not found"  I checked the man pages and mput is not listed as a 
command.
I then found this http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=428082   But 
this was back in 2007.  

The way the man page is written for the current sftp makes it sound like put 
can be used for multiple files since glob is ok to use. 


put [-Ppr] local-path [remote-path]
Upload local-path and store it on the remote machine.  If the
remote path name is not specified, it is given the same name it
has on the local machine. local-path may contain glob(3)
characters and may match multiple files.  If it does and
remote-path is specified, then remote-path must specify a
directory.

If ether the -P or -p flag is specified, then full file
permissions and access times are copied too.

If the -r flag is specified then directories will be copied
recursively.  Note that sftp does not follow symbolic links when
performing recursive transfers.

 Plus when I type:  put -r *   two files get transferred and the rest, which 
are directories, do not.  The -r is supposed to copy the directories 
recursively.  That is when I get the cononicalise error.  

I am new at this so I could be wrong.  I thought that sftp was appropriate to 
use for this purpose(uploading files to a web server).  I could be wrong about 
that too...

Any help would be much appreciated.

-Steven


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/895684.80974...@web111717.mail.gq1.yahoo.com



Re: Bug#611380: openssh-client: sftp's put -r fails with "Unable to canonicalise path"

2011-05-19 Thread David Jardine
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:35:22PM -0700, Steven Sciame wrote:
> 
>  
>  I am attempting to upload files onto my webserver using sftp.  As far as I 
> can 
>  tell from reading the man pages and searching online, the correct syntax 
> once 
>  connected via sftp is:
>  
>  put -r * 

I'm no expert myself, but shouldn't that be

   mput *

Cheers,
David


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110519205743.GA2209@gennes.augarten



Re: Bug report: Which package?

2011-05-15 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi,

sorry it took me so long to react to your quick and helpful replies, I first 
had to recover from an illness.

I verified that xserver-xorg-input-evdev is installed. The packages xserver-
xorg-input-{kbd,mouse} were not installed, but installing them changed 
nothing.

Ctrl+Alt+F<1-6> does not do anything. SysRQ+reisub however triggers a reboot, 
as expected.

I just noticed an oddity during system book: It's saying
"startpar: service(s) returned failure: udev". In the system log however I 
found no mentioning of udev besides two lines saying "<30>udev[...]: starting 
version 167". But I guess this is still not okay?

Kind regards,
Ralf Jung

PS: Please add me to CC as I am not subscribed to the list.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105152022.05656.ralfjun...@gmx.de



Re: Bug report: Which package?

2011-05-05 Thread Arno Schuring
Ralf Jung (ralfjun...@gmx.de on 2011-05-04 22:19 +0200):
> Hi list,
> 
> The problem is that my USB keyboard and mouse do not work properly
> when Debian starts up: Only if they are plugged in after boot
> finished, they will work. If I have them plugged in already during
> boot, they still work fine in GRUB, but when the graphical login
> comes up, neither mouse nor keyboard react.
Like others have said, xorg-input-input-evdev is the most likely
suspect. But you should check first if the problem really is in X only.
So when you are on the login screen, press ctrl-alt-f1 and see if it
drops you to a console. Try to login there. If that doesn't work, the
problem is not in X but most likely with udev or even the kernel.

To workaround the situation, you could try to add the following
to /etc/X11/xorg.conf (section "ServerFlags"), create it if necessary:
option  "AllowEmptyInput"  "false"


Hope this helps,
Arno


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110505135645.6e1e6...@neminis.loos.site



Re: Bug report: Which package?

2011-05-04 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <201105042219.02801.ralfjun...@gmx.de>, Ralf Jung wrote:
>I am having trouble with Debian, and I do not know which package is
>responsible for that. According to the wiki, I should then go here to ask,
>so that's what I do :)
>The problem is that my USB keyboard and mouse do not work properly when
>Debian starts up: Only if they are plugged in after boot finished, they
>will work. If I have them plugged in already during boot, they still work
>fine in GRUB, but when the graphical login comes up, neither mouse nor
>keyboard react. This happens both with the devices connected directly to a
>USB port and with an active hub in between. I am running Debian testing
>with all updates applied.

Sounds like an X.org problem.  First, make sure you have the packages 
"xserver-xorg-input-evdev", "xserver-xorg-input-kbd", and "xserver-xorg-input-
mouse" installed.  If so, I think the bug is with one of those packages, 
probably -evdev.

As far as subscribing to the list, feel free not to, but remember that the 
mailing list policy is to send replies to the list and to NOT CC the original 
poster.  If you want to receive CCs (like I have sent you), you'll need to 
mention that you want a CC in each of your postings to the list.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: BUG DOSEMU I can't understand this but still exist

2011-04-22 Thread shawn wilson
On Apr 22, 2011 8:45 AM, "lemonnier"  wrote:
>
>
>Programs developed for the real mode in turbo
>pascal work correctly.
>
>But programs developed in 16-bit protected
>(DPMI) don't work.

I'm not sure what the difference between turbo pascal and any other version
is. However, what its saying is that you can't write to OS memory within
dosemu (with pascal?). So, if you try to access dma address space (or maybe
even elevate to a higher ring of the processor) it will fail.

Someone here might be able to give you better feedback. However I'd suggest
you look for a dosemu mailing list or other forum for that discussion.


Re: Bug in grub-pc results in unbootable system after installation (was: What happened to debian - does "stable" keep having any meaning?)

2011-03-25 Thread Geronimo
Hello,

Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Thanks for your persistence,
> I already feared you might give up on that one.

I love debian and for me there's no alternative, so I can't give up!
 
> BTW, I was wrong about the fix not being part of squeeze: the link above
> says the fix should be included in 1.98+20100804-12. But there's another
> user (message #154) that says the issue isn't fixed yet. 

As Tom and you stated, that the update from 6.0 to 6.0.1 did not change grub, 
So the question is not, whether that bug is fixed or not.

The most *important* question is, *which* change caused grub to break - as 
grub worked fine (beside having to patch grub.cfg for hdx) before the 6.0.1 
update.

> You can simply send en email to 594967 at bugs.debian.org and try to get
> Colin Watson's attention.

Should I? - I don't have any information, that's not already part of the bug 
report.

Sorry for not having googled by myself, but sometimes you don't have the right 
idea/search-token ...


kind regards

Gero


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103251440.53813.geronimo...@arcor.de



Re: bug in the install

2011-02-13 Thread consul tores
2011/2/13 Wolodja Wentland :
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 04:39 -0500, Travis wrote:
>> any ways, do an install with  b43 wireless card and don't feed it
>> firmware.  this breaks the network and then the updates and then the
>> voltial line in apt sources.  in other words if someone attempts to
>> install debian on a laptop its going to be a bitch to get working if
>> they haven't used linux for years.

Hello

I had a Compaq with that wifi card, when i installed Debian on it, i
did the installation directly by eth0, and then i installed b43
firmware, usung b43fw-cutter.

Now, i have 3 laptops with intel wifi cards, and i use 1 rtl-8187L usb
card to install and install private firmware; the rtl-8187L does not
need extra firmware, it just works correctly.


>> sorry but i hate all linux's for what they've become ( i miss old mandrake 
>> 7.2
>> ) and debian was the last hope, now i'm not so sure :-(, automagic is EVIL!
>
> There is no single "Linux" entity, but I much prefer some of the
> automagic that is happening now to the manual work needed earlier. A
> good example for automagic gone wrong is grub2, where very few users
> actually understand how they are supposed to configure it if they *know*
> what they want and the scripts just don't come up with that.
>
> An example of automagic done right is Xorg. It configures itself
> correctly most of the time and if you need to change something you can
> place a little snippet in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ that contains exactly
> the single setting you want to change.

Well, i am having a problem with my touch-pad, clicks are not working,
and i am unsure how configure it!


> --
>  .''`.     Wolodja Wentland    


-- 
           Consultores Agropecuarios.
Administracion, Produccion, Capacitacion.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi-yorbdqhe66pp6ue4cswuolvqm6uc5em...@mail.gmail.com



Re: bug in the install

2011-02-13 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 04:39 -0500, Travis wrote:
> any ways, do an install with  b43 wireless card and don't feed it
> firmware.  this breaks the network and then the updates and then the
> voltial line in apt sources.  in other words if someone attempts to
> install debian on a laptop its going to be a bitch to get working if
> they haven't used linux for years.

This is simply not true, but rather the effect of missing information.
There are a variety of different images and one of them will certainly
suit your needs.

It is my impression that you either want a CD1, DVD1 or BD1 image or a
netinstall image with firmware [0]. Or you can prepare a USB stick with
all needed firmware packages in the second partition [1] or just
download a firmware tarball and follow the method at [2].

I fail to see how this is a bug though. I would rather think that you
did not follow the installation guide.

> the tail-tell sign is, after the get there system installed synaptic works
> funny, but works-ish, and if they try apt-get  it fails with a 
> method
> error

It works funny? Is it telling jokes? What is a "method error"?

You have to realise that we are willing to help you, but we need more
detailed information in order to accomplish that. Make it easy for us
please.

> sorry but i hate all linux's for what they've become ( i miss old mandrake 7.2
> ) and debian was the last hope, now i'm not so sure :-(, automagic is EVIL! 

There is no single "Linux" entity, but I much prefer some of the
automagic that is happening now to the manual work needed earlier. A
good example for automagic gone wrong is grub2, where very few users
actually understand how they are supposed to configure it if they *know*
what they want and the scripts just don't come up with that.

An example of automagic done right is Xorg. It configures itself
correctly most of the time and if you need to change something you can
place a little snippet in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ that contains exactly
the single setting you want to change.

If you hate Linux use something else and be happy with it.

[0] 
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/6.0.0/
[1] http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch04s03.html.en#ftn.id561911
(footnote 4)
[2] http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch06s04.html.en
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/firmware/

-- 
  .''`. Wolodja Wentland 
 : :'  :
 `. `'` 4096R/CAF14EFC 
   `-   081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: bug in the install

2011-02-13 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 04:39:20 -0500, Travis wrote:

> sorry for using this email but i stopped helping linux years ago(i still
> donate tho) when the bug systems got outta wack super-geek only
> usability ...

(...)

And the bug you are referring to is...?

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.02.13.12.59...@gmail.com



Re: bug in the install

2011-02-13 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Klistvud  wrote:
> Dne, 13. 02. 2011 10:39:20 je Travis napisal(a):
>>
>> any ways, do an install with  b43 wireless card and don't feed it
>> firmware.
>> this breaks the network and then the updates and then the voltial line in
>> apt sources.
>
> The move towards a firmware-free kernel was quite prominently advertised on
> Debian-related sites and in articles all over the Internet. While it poses
> practical challenges to the average user, it is welcomed as a move in the
> right direction by many Debian users, me humbly included.
>
>> in other words
>> if someone attempts to install debian on a laptop its going to be a bitch
>> to get working if they haven't used linux for years.
>
> Agreed, Debian is somewhat messy to install without a working Internet
> connection. It was the same with Lenny. If you want an out-of-the-box Debian
> for Dummies, just install Ubuntu.

Or use a Debian Live CD:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.0-live/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTimrtP5YG2Mit2B=5xe--esbh1fsyc4rgppxd...@mail.gmail.com



Re: bug in the install

2011-02-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-02-13 11:44 +0100, Klistvud wrote:

> Dne, 13. 02. 2011 10:39:20 je Travis napisal(a):
>> any ways, do an install with  b43 wireless card and don't feed it  
>> firmware.
>> this breaks the network and then the updates and then the voltial  
>> line in
>> apt sources.
>
> The move towards a firmware-free kernel was quite prominently  
> advertised on Debian-related sites and in articles all over the  
> Internet. While it poses practical challenges to the average user, it  
> is welcomed as a move in the right direction by many Debian users, me  
> humbly included.

I would like to add that this does not really have something to do with
the OP's problem, because Broadcom has never allowed to distribute b43
firmware.  You have to resort to kludges like b43fw-cutter to obtain it,
I went through that hassle myself.

>> in other words
>> if someone attempts to install debian on a laptop its going to be a  
>> bitch to
>> get working if they haven't used linux for years.
>
> Agreed, Debian is somewhat messy to install without a working Internet  
> connection. It was the same with Lenny. If you want an out-of-the-box  
> Debian for Dummies, just install Ubuntu.

In this case he would have had the same problem on Ubuntu, though.
Aptosid might have worked, since they seem to include[0] openfwwf[1]
firmware.  Stefan Lippers-Hollmann has put this into sidux/aptosid for a
long time, yet seems unable to do something about his intention to
include it in Debian[2,3].

Sven


0. http://aptosid.com/debian/pool/fix.main/o/openfwwf/
1. http://www.ing.unibs.it/~openfwwf/
2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513973
3. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513974


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87lj1k2nwn@turtle.gmx.de



Re: bug in the install

2011-02-13 Thread Klistvud

Dne, 13. 02. 2011 10:39:20 je Travis napisal(a):
sorry for using this email but i stopped helping linux years ago(i  
still
donate tho) when the bug systems got outta wack super-geek only  
usability

...


The Reportbug utility you get with a stock Debian/Gnome install is  
absolutely newbie-friendly (even I can use it, which tells a lot).




any ways, do an install with  b43 wireless card and don't feed it  
firmware.
this breaks the network and then the updates and then the voltial  
line in

apt sources.


The move towards a firmware-free kernel was quite prominently  
advertised on Debian-related sites and in articles all over the  
Internet. While it poses practical challenges to the average user, it  
is welcomed as a move in the right direction by many Debian users, me  
humbly included.



in other words
if someone attempts to install debian on a laptop its going to be a  
bitch to

get working if they haven't used linux for years.


Agreed, Debian is somewhat messy to install without a working Internet  
connection. It was the same with Lenny. If you want an out-of-the-box  
Debian for Dummies, just install Ubuntu.




the tail-tell sign is, after the get there system installed synaptic  
works
funny, but works-ish, and if they try apt-get  it fails  
with a

method error

sorry but i hate all linux's for what they've become ( i miss old  
mandrake
7.2 ) and debian was the last hope, now i'm not so sure :-(,  
automagic is

EVIL!



Admittedly, some changes have been for the worse, but several have been  
for the better. Unfortunately, the Linux community never seems to quite  
agree which is which ... ;)


--
Cheerio,

Klistvud  
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com
Certifiable Loonix User #481801  Please reply to the list, not to  
me.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297593860.14202.0@compax



Re: BUG: Epiphany and Evolution start in offline mode when I am online wireless

2010-11-28 Thread Bob Proulx
Lenny_helper wrote:
> I am connected to the Internet via an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
> (iwl3945 module). Epiphany and Evolution work fine, but always start in
> "offline mode".

Known bug.  It is the network-manager problem.

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549451

And

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530024

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: BUG: Epiphany and Evolution start in offline mode when I am online wireless

2010-11-28 Thread Lenny_helper

Lenny "stable" 2.6.86 GNOME 2.22.3
Path: Applications -> System Tools -> Configuration Editor
Folder path: apps/epiphany/general/  
In the window to the right (Name/Value) look for managed network.
Uncheck this value.
Exit
Restart browser.

I've noticed the same problem with the Network Icon always has the red 'x'
Until it becomes I probably I won't get around to trouble shooting it.



I am connected to the Internet via an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
(iwl3945 module). Epiphany and Evolution work fine, but always start in
"offline mode". To connect to any site resp. receive/send e-mail, I have
to uncheck the item "Work offline" in the "Files" menu of
Epiphany/Evolution. Iceweasel/Firefox behaves different and starts in
online mode. Lynx and ping also work fine from the start.

Perhaphs its a bug in Gnome: When I am connected wireless the network
manager always shows the "not connected" icon, even when I am online.
Connecting wired via eth0 "cures" the problem. Perhaps Gnome notifies
all Gnome-native apps that I am offline when I am using wlan0 (because
eth0 is dead).

I am using Debian GNU/Linux "Lenny" (testing), kernel 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1
SMP, and Gnome 2.22.1.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmas...@lists.debian.org




-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/BUG%3A-Epiphany-and-Evolution-start-in-offline-mode-when-I-am-online-wireless-tp17578218p30327086.html
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/30327086.p...@talk.nabble.com



Re: bug 530024 on squeeze

2010-08-03 Thread Joao Ferreira gmail
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:15 +, Camaleón wrote:
> > Is this bug?  
> 
> Not for me. But having the NM applet started by default and seeing no 
> ethernet device there (but working) is a bit confusing for users who
> want 
> to use NM. 

agree ! :)

if NM is a feature in Debian (and affects other SW components) then it
should be operating properly on a fresh install... 

... or fully disabled !

but, no... I would also not call it a bug... just an issue :)

jmf



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280853429.4921.35.ca...@debj5n.critical.pt



Re: bug 530024 on squeeze

2010-08-03 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:29:59 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:12:45AM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:48:14 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
>> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530024
> ...
>> Mmm, if the bug is that ethernet cards are not detected/recognized by
>> default by NM, yes, the "problem" is still there, at least for me.
>> 
>> (not really a "problem" because I never use NM :-P)
>> 
>> Side note: ethernet card is fully available/operative, just NM detects
>> nothing.
> 
> Is this bug?  

Not for me. But having the NM applet started by default and seeing no 
ethernet device there (but working) is a bit confusing for users who want 
to use NM. 

> This seems to me user configuration issue.  I am basically
> follwing: README.Debian NEWS.Debian.gz of network-manager Just disable
> eth0 in /etc/network/interfaces like:
> 
> 
> # The loopback network interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
> 
> # The primary network interface
> #allow-hotplug eth0
> #iface eth0 inet dhcp
> -
> 
> Then NM will detect eth0

Yes, and that's quite similar to the information that the bug report 
(comment #1) refers to.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.08.03.16.15...@gmail.com



Re: bug 530024 on squeeze

2010-08-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi,

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:12:45AM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:48:14 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530024
...
> Mmm, if the bug is that ethernet cards are not detected/recognized by 
> default by NM, yes, the "problem" is still there, at least for me.
> 
> (not really a "problem" because I never use NM :-P)
> 
> Side note: ethernet card is fully available/operative, just NM detects 
> nothing.

Is this bug?  This seems to me user configuration issue.  I am basically
follwing: README.Debian NEWS.Debian.gz of network-manager Just disable
eth0 in /etc/network/interfaces like:


# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback

# The primary network interface
#allow-hotplug eth0
#iface eth0 inet dhcp
-

Then NM will detect eth0




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100803152959.ga12...@debian.org



Re: bug 530024 on squeeze

2010-08-03 Thread Joao Ferreira gmail
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 22:39 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:13:03 -0400
> "John A. Sullivan III"  wrote:
> 
> Hello John,
> 
> > I wonder if this is why there are some many problems with Evolution
> > 2.30 breaking.  From those threads, it seems that Evolution is looking
> 
> I don't use Evo, but from what you say, it seems highly likely that
> Network Manager's bug is the problem.

I use Evolution and yes, Evolutio relies on NM to determine if a
connection is up or not

If NM says there is no connection, then Evo will go into Offline mode;
sometimes I need to tell it to "Work Online" in order to have it work.

jmf


> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280824920.4921.3.ca...@debj5n.critical.pt



Re: bug 530024 on squeeze

2010-08-02 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:13:03 -0400
"John A. Sullivan III"  wrote:

Hello John,

> I wonder if this is why there are some many problems with Evolution
> 2.30 breaking.  From those threads, it seems that Evolution is looking

I don't use Evo, but from what you say, it seems highly likely that
Network Manager's bug is the problem.

-- 
 Regards  _
 / )   "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
It belongs to them, let's give it back
Beds Are Burning - Midnight Oil


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: bug 530024 on squeeze

2010-08-02 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 11:22 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:48:14 +0100
> Joao Ferreira gmail  wrote:
> 
> Hello Joao,
> 
> > ... or has anyone been able to safelly overcome the issue without any
> > side impacts... :)
> 
> My connection comes up at boot and that's all I care about.  The fact
> that it's not available to Network Manager doesn't worry me.
> 
> Maybe it should, though   :-)
> 
I wonder if this is why there are some many problems with Evolution 2.30
breaking.  From those threads, it seems that Evolution is looking to
Network Manager and, if the interface isn't managed, Evolution assumes
there is no network.  At least, that's what I took as the gist of those
threads - John


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1280783583.3356.6.ca...@localhost



Re: bug 530024 on squeeze

2010-08-02 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:48:14 +0100
Joao Ferreira gmail  wrote:

Hello Joao,

> ... or has anyone been able to safelly overcome the issue without any
> side impacts... :)

My connection comes up at boot and that's all I care about.  The fact
that it's not available to Network Manager doesn't worry me.

Maybe it should, though   :-)

-- 
 Regards  _
 / )   "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Dream on white boy, dream on black girl
Original Sin - INXS


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: bug 530024 on squeeze

2010-08-02 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:48:14 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:

> can anyone confirm the status of this issue in current Squeeze ? I also
> had this problem some months ago but I ended up installing Lenny
> (because of other reasons too)
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530024
> 
> ... or has anyone been able to safelly overcome the issue without any
> side impacts... :)

Mmm, if the bug is that ethernet cards are not detected/recognized by 
default by NM, yes, the "problem" is still there, at least for me.

(not really a "problem" because I never use NM :-P)

Side note: ethernet card is fully available/operative, just NM detects 
nothing.

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.08.02.11.12...@gmail.com



Re: bug in the Debian installer?!

2010-07-06 Thread Jozsi Avadkan
So it's a bug. :(

> bug in the Debian installer?
> 
> I have two disks [2x1,5 TB WD Green].
> In the Debian Lenny installer I set up RAID1 with the two disks.
> After that, I put the RAID1 in LVM.
> After that, I create a VG, and put these LV in it:
> 
> 1 - lvm/256 MB/boot
> 2 - dm_crypt/5 GB/swap
> 3 - dm_crypt/30 GB/root
> 3 - dm_crypt/1,4 TB/home
> 
> After that, I select to put the /home on the "home" LVs, /boot on the
> "boot" LV.
> 
> 
> lvm/256 MB/boot || dm_crypt/5 GB/swap || dm_crypt/30 GB/root ||
> dm_crypt/1,4 TB/home
> 
>   LVM 1,5 TB
> 
>   RAID1 - 1,5 TB  || RAID1 - 1,5 TB
> 
> So I just want to encrypt my HDD's in RAID1. [And put the OS on it, boot
> from it.]
> 
> Questions:
> 
> A) Why isn't this working? [picture:
> http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8066/whytx.jpg] - the system boots
> for a while - at least i can type in the passwords for the 3 encrypted
> partitions, but then it puts me to an "initramfs"
> 
> B) For some reason..the installer uses LILO as boot manager, not GRUB.
> Why? Could that be the problem?
> 
> C) So...if its not possible to do this, then how? :(
> 
> D) Is this a bug in the installer? [to let the user install a system,
> that will wont boot...]
> 
> Thank you for any help.
> 
> Questions also here: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=Qvnxhs8i
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1278481403.4694.0.ca...@localhost



Re: Bug after unstable upgrade

2010-07-01 Thread Aioanei Rares

On 07/01/2010 01:36 PM, Satellite wrote:
 Yesterday, after within an upgrade I issued also 'dist-upgrade' and 
it upgraded 'cups' package. I'm also using Canon i-SENSYS MF4120 
multifunctional printer/scanner, so I had drivers from the official 
Canon site installed ('cndrvcups-common_2.00-2_i386' and 
'cndrvcups-ufr2-uk_2.00-2_i386').
But the upgrade removed these two packages and I now the printer 
doesn't work and I can't install them back.


Thank you in advance.

Alexander


Paste the exact error you get when trying to install the packages. The 
more details, the better.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c2c7670.5040...@gmail.com



Re: Bug after unstable upgrade

2010-07-01 Thread Ron Johnson

On 07/01/2010 05:36 AM, Satellite wrote:

Yesterday, after within an upgrade I issued also 'dist-upgrade' and it
upgraded 'cups' package. I'm also using Canon i-SENSYS MF4120
multifunctional printer/scanner, so I had drivers from the official
Canon site installed ('cndrvcups-common_2.00-2_i386' and
'cndrvcups-ufr2-uk_2.00-2_i386').
But the upgrade removed these two packages and I now the printer doesn't
work and I can't install them back.



What message do you get when you try to reinstall them?

--
Seek truth from facts.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c2c78af.7030...@cox.net



Re: Bug#541658: iceweasel doesn't open research.microsoft.com

2010-06-29 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:02:15 -0400, sasha mal wrote:

> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 3.0.6-3
> 
> The bug exists, the iceweasel package maintainer is lazy and refuses to
> handle it.

(...)

I did not read the full bug report but for sure that page it is loading 
well here (lenny and iceweasel 3.0.6).

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.06.29.13.13...@gmail.com



Re: Bug#579384: Acknowledgement (How to trick my Debian in thinking that a package is not installed)

2010-04-30 Thread Daniel Burrows
  So, it turns out this is surprisingly tricky.  The problem is that the
aptitude initialization process runs a mark-and-sweep before the whole
package system is ready.  That seems very dicey to me, but the comments
seem to indicate that it's necessary to force apt to behave properly
with auto flags when aptitude loads its sticky settings.  But until the
sticky settings are loaded, I don't know what's held on the system.

  This whole bit of the code needs to be examined, I think.  Which means
this is a deeper change than it should be. :(

  Daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100501053251.ga27...@emurlahn.burrows.local



Re: Bug Report : Running Pymol for terminal produce ImportError: No module named copy

2010-04-09 Thread Johan Grönqvist

Sushil Mishra skrev:

When i try to open pymol by terminal thsi is producing fallowing error--

sus...@sushilnb:~$ pymol
'import site' failed; use -v for traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/pymol//__init__.py", line 32, 
in 

from copy import deepcopy
ImportError: No module named copy
sus...@sushilnb:~$



I do not remember having had such a problem with pymol in debian. As I 
understand it, the command "from copy import deepcopy" is the first to 
run at all.


Given that the module copy is in the python standard library, I find it 
surprising that it is not found. Do you have any problems with other 
python programs?


Can you run the line
python -c "from copy import deepcopy"
without problems (errors)?

/ johan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hpne6b$ob...@dough.gmane.org



Re: Bug in file command magic

2010-02-10 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Wed,10.Feb.10, 12:02:02, Giovanni Funchal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've just noticed that the file command returns wrong mime for a file.
> In fact, if a LaTeX file uses the command \bibligraphystyle somewhere
> in the beginning, file will return mime "text/vnd.graphviz" instead of
> "text/x-tex". I took a look at /usr/share/file/magic (on Lenny), and
> it has something like :
 
[snip]

> Anyone knows where I can report this?

You already have the answer, but here are two more ways:

$ dpkg -S /your/buggy/file

or even

$ reportbug /your/buggy/file

(reportbug uses dpkg -S AFAIK).

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug in file command magic

2010-02-10 Thread Jon Dowland
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 01:30:11PM +0200, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
> I think this belongs to package 'file'...

Yup, source package file is the best place.  See
 if you need info on
how to report bugs in Debian.



-- 
Jon Dowland


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug in file command magic

2010-02-10 Thread Stephen Powell
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:02:02 -0500 (EST), Giovanni Funchal wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've just noticed that the file command returns wrong mime for a file.
> In fact, if a LaTeX file uses the command \bibligraphystyle somewhere
> in the beginning, file will return mime "text/vnd.graphviz" instead of
> "text/x-tex". I took a look at /usr/share/file/magic (on Lenny), and
> it has something like :
> 
> 0regex/100[\r\n\t\ ]*graph[\r\n\t\ ]*.*\\{graphviz graph text
> !:mimetext/vnd.graphviz
> 
> This regular expression matches \biblioGRAPHystyle in the first
> thousand characters or so. A good fix would be :
> 
> - 0regex/100[\r\n\t\ ]*graph[\r\n\t\ ]*.*\\{graphviz graph text
> + 0regex/100(^|[\r\n\t\ ]+)graph[\r\n\t\ ]*.*\\{graphviz graph 
> text
> 
> Since in the dot file format[1], the keyword "graph" must be preceded
> by a white space or be in the beginning of the file.
> 
> Anyone knows where I can report this?
>
> [1] http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html

According to the packages page on the Debian web site, /usr/share/file/magic
belongs to package libmagic1.  I would suggest filing a bug report against
package libmagic1.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug in file command magic

2010-02-10 Thread Γιώργος Πάλλας

Giovanni Funchal wrote:

Hi,

I've just noticed that the file command returns wrong mime for a file.
In fact, if a LaTeX file uses the command \bibligraphystyle somewhere
in the beginning, file will return mime "text/vnd.graphviz" instead of
"text/x-tex". I took a look at /usr/share/file/magic (on Lenny), and
it has something like :

0regex/100[\r\n\t\ ]*graph[\r\n\t\ ]*.*\\{graphviz graph text
!:mimetext/vnd.graphviz

This regular expression matches \biblioGRAPHystyle in the first
thousand characters or so. A good fix would be :

- 0regex/100[\r\n\t\ ]*graph[\r\n\t\ ]*.*\\{graphviz graph text
+ 0regex/100(^|[\r\n\t\ ]+)graph[\r\n\t\ ]*.*\\{graphviz graph text

Since in the dot file format[1], the keyword "graph" must be preceded
by a white space or be in the beginning of the file.

Anyone knows where I can report this?

-- Giovanni

[1] http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html


  


I think this belongs to package 'file'...



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Bug#564829: How to turn off all APT security checking?

2010-02-08 Thread jidanni
OK, I'll try messing with the order next time it happens.
I can tell you one thing for sure, now that is has recovered:
It is the _Release files that are the problem. The Packages.bz2 files are
fine. It was the _Release file that finally caught up later to it:
$ md5sum Packages.bz2*
10c9ee48399ebee030a1e2e744adb5ac  Packages.bz2
10c9ee48399ebee030a1e2e744adb5ac  Packages.bz2.1
10c9ee48399ebee030a1e2e744adb5ac  Packages.bz2.2
$ find /var/lib/apt/lists -name *multi\*|xargs grep -h main.*386.*Packages.bz2
 10c9ee48399ebee030a1e2e744adb5ac63469 main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
 14762c3e9fc81bda49228848f274196669aadd3763469 main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
 a55a312af80841aa8fdc925a855ee429809e3c38a5735d97082476800610d8a763469 
main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
$ find /var/lib/apt/lists -name *multi\*|xargs grep -l main.*386.*Packages.bz2
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.tw.debian.org_debian-multimedia_dists_sid_Release
$ LC_ALL=C date -u
Tue Feb  9 02:47:00 UTC 2010


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#564829: How to turn off all APT security checking?

2010-02-08 Thread jidanni
Today it's
W: Failed to fetch 
http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian-multimedia/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
$ wget -Y off  
http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian-multimedia/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
$ wget -Y off --no-cache 
http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian-multimedia/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
Connecting to ftp.tw.debian.org|140.112.8.139|:80... connected.
$ md5sum Packages.bz2*
10c9ee48399ebee030a1e2e744adb5ac  Packages.bz2
10c9ee48399ebee030a1e2e744adb5ac  Packages.bz2.1
$ find /var/lib/apt/lists -name *multi\*|xargs grep -h main.*386.*Packages.bz2
 912031f75e5830ec588db29412c6c7c663319 main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
 c405f04354827ace1a72ab9881def69f2996f68a63319 main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
 096c2f45a9c91374d094a4142f952f71c93eb19b58967b106dc232fa7fcf309963319 
main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
# LC_ALL=C date -u
Tue Feb  9 01:26:43 UTC 2010
# LC_ALL=C date
Tue Feb  9 09:26:53 CST 2010
# grep ppp.*local.*IP /var/log/syslog
Feb  9 02:31:26 jidanni1 pppd[3689]: local  IP address 218.163.0.34
# apt-get update|LC_ALL=C ts|grep tw.*sid
Feb 09 09:36:45 Hit http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid Release.gpg
Feb 09 09:36:45 Hit http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid Release
Feb 09 09:36:47 Get:1 http://ftp.tw.debian.org sid/main Packages [63.5kB]
W: Failed to fetch 
http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian-multimedia/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
  Hash Sum mismatch
E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug with translation

2010-01-22 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:48:28 +0100, Daniele Di Sarli wrote:

> Hi,
> I don't know where to report a problem in the translation of the Lenny
> release notes.

Hello,

I would try first by contacting the italian localization/translation team:

http://wiki.debian.org/L10n/Italian

Greetings,

-- 
Camaleón


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug Perhaps: Debian Testing AMD64 2009-12-27 Daily Build NetInst

2009-12-28 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,28.Dec.09, 00:22:35, Chris Brandstetter wrote:
> 
> Now the system asks to load the tigon/tg3_tso.bin firmware. (Broadcom
> Network Card firmware)
> 
> I selected no and continued on the install.  (Strange, did it get the
> firmware from somewhere else, or was there an open source alternative?)
 
In recent kernels (2.6.31?) a lot of previously included firmwares have 
been moved to separate packages (firmware-linux-nonfree in this specific 
case).

Since this will make a lot of users unhappy[0] the installer offers to 
install the additional firmware, probably from some external source, 
like a USB stick or similar.

[0] it's quite difficult do do a *net*install without a working network 
card ;)

> It does not indicate that there is a problem, or that the netinst will
> or will not work without the firmware.  Perhaps a better message saying
> what requires the firmware, whether or not there is an open source
> option, and the ability to use it, and whether or not the device will
> work.
> 
> Overall the message is very, vague to an end user, a little
> clarification would be good.

You are probably right about this. If it hasn't been requested before 
you might want to file an installation report.

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: bug - Setting up php5-idn (1.2b-5.3)

2009-11-05 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <350858.31469...@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, kiw...@yahoo.com wrote:
>Setting up php5-idn (1.2b-5.3) ...
>*** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but
> the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer
> script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf,
> and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using
> old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh!
>
> Please inform the package maintainer about this problem.
>
>Creating config file /etc/php5/conf.d/idn.ini with new version
>
>Can someone please update me as to the issues/resolution that yoou may have.
>Is there an update or bug fix?

I'm sure you can use the web interface on bugs.debian.org yourself.  If 
there's not a bug for this issue on the package, I'd be much obliged if you'd 
file one by using reportbug or the bug report email address.

If you'd like to be notified about all activity on a bug, you can subscribe to 
email updates by sending a subscription request to a special address based on 
the bug number; there will also be a mailto: link exposed on the web interface 
one the bug appears there.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net   ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: bug report for the ogss shell?

2009-08-08 Thread John Haggerty
Actually looking at this I seem to have found this is based on "libgmail"
which is in package python-libgmail 0.1.11-2 which was supposed "closed" for
freedom from bugs :(
The error I seem to keep seeing is an error in sendMessage routine but I
lack the present python skills to fix it as well :(

And what's worse is that I found a bare minimum of 2 other implimentations
of the "send gmail email through python" but they are all using generic mime
and not for the remote command execution through the email service

Just great :(

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 6:25 PM, John Haggerty  wrote:

> I locate the following software which may be of use for some of my problems
> 1) use an existing way to log info via email (in this case google's) 2)
> attempting to do so remotely to affect logs on a machine
>
> Towards that end I located the following
>
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/ogss-open-gmail-sms-shell
>
> It seems to be good but then there hasn't been an update in something like
> 4 months.
>
> (granted this may not be 100% perfect I would love some pointers to some
> generic either python or moer general app supoprt besides the author)
>
> I have the following error when I attempt to use the software to login to
> my gmail account (a's is the character length of the login and X's are
> character length of the password z's are the mobile number and yy is the
> carrier id string in the instructions) ow...@bouncyinc:~/Desktop/OGSS$
> sudo python ogss.py aa xxx zzz-zzz- yy
> [sudo] password for owner: Starting ogss Logfile at:/home/owner/ogss.log
> Opening log file for reading Parsing user input Connecting to Gmail Logging
> into Gmail Opening log file for writing Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "ogss.py", line 127, in  main(sys.argv) File "ogss.py", line
> 81, in main account.sendMessage(instructions) File
> "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/libgmail.py", line 617, in sendMessage
> raise GmailSendError, resultInfo[SM_MSG] libgmail.GmailSendError: Please try
> again. At that point it claims that there is a "send error" which I don't
> quite understand is there a way to fix this to allow this to work?


Re: bug report advise needed

2009-07-27 Thread Florian Kriener
On Akira Sano wrote:
> I want to file a bug report about segfault of several applications at
> boot (unstable, after recent upgrade of several packages).  The main
> segfault is about gdm, but it seems from the output that
> /lib/lsb/init-functions as well as ld-2.9  (libc6?) cause the segfault.
>  Also, mplayer, emacs22(-gtk), x-session-manager and startx segfault as
> well as the corrupt of console screen after aptitude safe-upgrade
> (mandb?).  I would like to to which application I should file this bug,
> and what should be sent with.

I would run memtest86 first to ensure that your memory is all right.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: bug report advise needed

2009-07-26 Thread Ron Johnson

On 2009-07-26 18:50, Akira Sano wrote:

I want to file a bug report about segfault of several
applications  at boot (unstable, after recent upgrade of several packages).

> The main segfault is about gdm, but it seems from the output that

/lib/lsb/init-functions as well as ld-2.9 (libc6?) cause the
segfault. Also, mplayer, emacs22(-gtk), x-session-manager and startx
segfault as well as the corrupt of console screen after aptitude
safe-upgrade (mandb?). I would like to to which application I should
file this bug, and what should be sent with.


I'd file it against libc6.

--
Scooty Puff, Sr
The Doom-Bringer


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: [BUG] CD image

2009-07-09 Thread Sjoerd Hardeman

Luis Maia schreef:

First sorry for using the mailing list and not bug-report but i didn't
find it would fit as
the debian-cd package bug.

I'd just wanted you to take a glance at
[http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13431] and hope next image 
would  get this fixed.


I had to boot without acpi to get debian installed and blacklist the
module,and 2.6.30 solved my problems.

Thank you for your time,
Luis.
Well, posting on this list makes it very unlikely that a maintainer sees 
this. Filing a report makes that much more likely.


Sjoerd




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: bug in installer? (was Re: debian testing installer & encrypted LVM question)

2009-07-06 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <4a50a818.8060...@ccf.auth.gr>, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
>Anyway, does it make
>any sense to partition a logical volume?

Not usually.  Might be useful in some odd corner case
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.   ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net  ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/\_/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: bug in installer? (was Re: debian testing installer & encrypted LVM question)

2009-07-05 Thread Γιώργος Πάλλας

Jochen Schulz wrote:

Giorgos Pallas:
  

-> failed to create a file system
The ext3 file system creation in partition #1 of LVM VG vg1, LV rootFS
failed


-- snip
  

Is this supposed to happen? Did I do something wrong?



I had the same issue when using the AMD64 squeeze installer a few days
ago. I think it is a bug, probably the same as reported in #534248.

J.
  


I had a mistake on the original email: It was the testing (squeeze) 
installer of AMD64, not the Lenny. It looks it is the bug you say - I 
sent some extra info to reproduce it.


The non-technical workaround: Burn a lenny installer, set up the 
encrypted lvm, install just the base system, and the upgrade to testing.


By the way, I *think* the problem was introduced by a new feature that 
they are trying to introduce: The partitioning of the logical volumes. 
After the installer crashed, I could see in /dev/mapper the logical 
volume foo of the volume group bar I had created, as well as a partition 
like thing:

/dev/mapper:
bar-foo
bar-foop1

Maybe I am wrong as to the development's intention. Anyway, does it make 
any sense to partition a logical volume?


G.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: bug in installer? (was Re: debian testing installer & encrypted LVM question)

2009-07-04 Thread Jochen Schulz
Giorgos Pallas:
> 
> -> failed to create a file system
> The ext3 file system creation in partition #1 of LVM VG vg1, LV rootFS
> failed
-- snip
> Is this supposed to happen? Did I do something wrong?

I had the same issue when using the AMD64 squeeze installer a few days
ago. I think it is a bug, probably the same as reported in #534248.

J.
-- 
If I am asked 'How are you' more than a million times in my life I
promise to explode.
[Agree]   [Disagree]
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: bug in installer? (was Re: debian testing installer & encrypted LVM question)

2009-07-04 Thread Giorgos Pallas
Giorgos Pallas wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> To me it looks like a bug, but I'd like to show it to the list before
> filing it as a bug.
>
> My goal is to install debian testing using encrypted LVM, but not using
> the entire disk: I want to keep a free partition for installing vista
> (for educational purposes...).
>
> So, the steps that create a problem while running the installer are:
>
> select Manual partitioning
> create on the disks free space, the first primary (for installing vista)
> [this step may be irrelevant]
> create primary for /boot
> create primary and select 'use as encryption volume'
> write changes to disk
> select encrypted volume
> use as phycical volume for lvm
> configure Logical Volume Manager appears ->select it
> create volume group
> create logical volume -> for the root filesystem
> create logical volume -> for  swap
> finish partitioning and write changes to disk->
>
> I see the summary:
> "The partition tables of the following devices are changed:
> LVM VG vg1, LV rootFS
> LVM VG vg1, LV swap
>
> The following partitions are going to be formatted:
> LVM VG vg1, LV rootFS as ext3
> LVM VG vg1, LV swap as swap
> "
>
> -> failed to create a file system
> The ext3 file system creation in partition #1 of LVM VG vg1, LV rootFS
> failed
>
> As I can see, /dev/mapper now contains:
> vg1-rootFS
> vg1-rootFSp1
> vg1-swap
> vg1-swapp1
>
> Is this supposed to happen? Did I do something wrong?
>
> Giorgos
>
>   


and something more, important I guess: I was installing using the latest
testing image for amd64...
I will now try with the lenny installer for amd64...

G.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: bug #350639

2009-05-20 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi,

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:32:01PM -0300, Tiago Saboga wrote:
> Freddy Freeloader  writes:
> > Thorny wrote:
> >> On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:05 -0700, Freddy Freeloader posted:
> >>>  In my mind there is no good reason for this fix to go into Sid
> >>> and then sit there until the dependencies are satisfied for that version
> >>> number.
> >>> 
> >>
> >> Well, that is the standard flow. I hear you that it isn't convenient for
> >> you but it is standard.
> >>   
> > It is also standard flow to fix bugs that are found in testing, not to
> > always wait until a new version comes down from Sid.  That's the
> > purpose for which testing exists.  Those bugs not found while a
> > package is in Sid are fixed in testing when fixing them does not
> > require a new dependency or will break some other package.  So why
> > should this bug be any different?  It exists in testing so it should
> > be fixed in testing too, not allowed to just sit for months when it's
> > a very simple fix. 
> 
> It seems you do not really understand the workflow in debian. No bug is
> never fixed in testing. No upload is never allowed to testing (ok,
> except in deep freeze, and even then the package is uploaded to
> testing-proposed-updates, not testing). Every single change to a package
> must go through sid first. So, if someone find a serious bug in kde 4.1
> now, there is no way to the maintainers to fix it in testing before kde
> 4.2 hits testing.

This statement is correct for pointing out the basic workflow but there
is a bit too strong word.  Never say "never" :-)

We do fix critical/grave/security bugs for stable.  There are special
testing security bug fix system once we get decently stable sesting, I
expect soonish.

> If you use testing, you should know that it can be at times even more
> broken than sid. It's the way it works. testing is less unstable than
> sid: it means testing changes less than sid, it's all.

Testing was supposed to be somewhat usable once "transition period" ends
just after release.  We are still in this transition period.

 > Hope that helps,

Osamu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: bug #350639

2009-05-18 Thread Tiago Saboga
Freddy Freeloader  writes:
> Thorny wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:05 -0700, Freddy Freeloader posted:
>>>  In my mind there is no good reason for this fix to go into Sid
>>> and then sit there until the dependencies are satisfied for that version
>>> number.
>>> 
>>
>> Well, that is the standard flow. I hear you that it isn't convenient for
>> you but it is standard.
>>   
> It is also standard flow to fix bugs that are found in testing, not to
> always wait until a new version comes down from Sid.  That's the
> purpose for which testing exists.  Those bugs not found while a
> package is in Sid are fixed in testing when fixing them does not
> require a new dependency or will break some other package.  So why
> should this bug be any different?  It exists in testing so it should
> be fixed in testing too, not allowed to just sit for months when it's
> a very simple fix. 

It seems you do not really understand the workflow in debian. No bug is
never fixed in testing. No upload is never allowed to testing (ok,
except in deep freeze, and even then the package is uploaded to
testing-proposed-updates, not testing). Every single change to a package
must go through sid first. So, if someone find a serious bug in kde 4.1
now, there is no way to the maintainers to fix it in testing before kde
4.2 hits testing.

If you use testing, you should know that it can be at times even more
broken than sid. It's the way it works. testing is less unstable than
sid: it means testing changes less than sid, it's all.

Hope that helps,

Tiago.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: bug #350639

2009-05-18 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI

On Seg, 18 Mai 2009, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
It is also standard flow to fix bugs that are found in testing, not  
to always wait until a new version comes down from Sid.


No, that's not the Debian flow.

That's the purpose for which testing exists.  Those bugs not found  
while a package is in Sid are fixed in testing when fixing them does  
not require a new dependency or will break some other package.  So  
why should this bug be any different?  It exists in testing so it  
should be fixed in testing too, not allowed to just sit for months  
when it's a very simple fix.  I could see the lag if this was a bug  
that's difficult to fix and in some package that hardly anyone uses,  
but that is not the case with g-v-m or this bug.  It exists in every  
Gnome installation by default.


I think you are misunderstanding the way Debian testing/unstable  
works. Packages never enter testing directly. All packages enter  
unstable, stay there for a set number of days (the standard is 10, but  
can be made smaller for things such as security fixes), and if  
sufficient conditions are met, then migrate to testing. These  
conditions involve, among possible others, number of serious bug  
present and if all the dependencies necessary for the package are in  
testing and can be migrated together.


There is not separate "bug fixing in testing" and "in unstable". Bugs  
are fixed, and new packages enter unstable.


I don't know what is the case with this specific bug. It may have been  
fixed in unstable, but Gnome is in process of a big migration (along  
with KDE) to testing, so it is normal that Gnome packages are blocked  
in unstable until everything can be migrated.




--
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
edua...@kalinowski.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: bug #350639

2009-05-18 Thread Freddy Freeloader

Thorny wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:05 -0700, Freddy Freeloader posted:

[...]
  

I have to ask why.  Why is this left up every user of testing to fix
this problem themselves when the fix is so simple?
[...]



One possible answer to this question would be that users of "testing" are
supposed to be able to troubleshoot and fix problems in "testing". The
maintainer may rely on that and not think there is a pressing need to do
it.
  
What you say about testing is even more true about Sid, yet the Sid 
version is fixed.  Following your logic there was no need to fix the bug 
in Sid at all as Sid users are supposed to be even more skilled in 
fixing the problems they run across.  Sid is supposed to be more buggy 
than testing by its very nature. 
  

Why can't this fix be
uploaded to the Debian repositories?  It's not like auto mounting of
cd/dvd's and portable usb devices is something hardly anyone does on a
daily basis.




All I could suggest is to ask the maintainer directly, he may not read
this list. The email address is available in the bug report or with the
package itself.
 
  

[...]



  

 In my mind there is no good reason for this fix to go into Sid
and then sit there until the dependencies are satisfied for that version
number.



Well, that is the standard flow. I hear you that it isn't convenient for
you but it is standard.
  
It is also standard flow to fix bugs that are found in testing, not to 
always wait until a new version comes down from Sid.  That's the purpose 
for which testing exists.  Those bugs not found while a package is in 
Sid are fixed in testing when fixing them does not require a new 
dependency or will break some other package.  So why should this bug be 
any different?  It exists in testing so it should be fixed in testing 
too, not allowed to just sit for months when it's a very simple fix.  I 
could see the lag if this was a bug that's difficult to fix and in some 
package that hardly anyone uses, but that is not the case with g-v-m or 
this bug.  It exists in every Gnome installation by default.


  

[...]

 
  

Testing is what the biggest portion of Debian users have on their
desktops.



Do you have any documentation to support this, I do understand how you
might think that reading lists and forums but I've never seen any
documentation of version percentages for desktops.

  

[...]



  

 Is the Debian development process in that much trouble, i.e. short of
 help, or
have such unreasonable versioning rules that something this simple can't
be fixed promptly?




Following the standards is not necessarily an indication of "being in
trouble", it's an indication of following standards and flow. "Stable" is
the version that is stable, probably in some sense that stability is a
result of the Debian "flow".

This isn't important for your question but I personally don't like to
automount, I prefer to mount as I choose and as needed. YMMV
I think I do understand your frustration, and you've got a good example to
work with but standards are standards and the flow has given us very good
stable Debian for many years, I want it to remain the same.


  




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: bug #350639

2009-05-18 Thread Thorny
On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:31:05 -0700, Freddy Freeloader posted:

[...]
> 
> I have to ask why.  Why is this left up every user of testing to fix
> this problem themselves when the fix is so simple?
>[...]

One possible answer to this question would be that users of "testing" are
supposed to be able to troubleshoot and fix problems in "testing". The
maintainer may rely on that and not think there is a pressing need to do
it.

>Why can't this fix be
> uploaded to the Debian repositories?  It's not like auto mounting of
> cd/dvd's and portable usb devices is something hardly anyone does on a
> daily basis.
>

All I could suggest is to ask the maintainer directly, he may not read
this list. The email address is available in the bug report or with the
package itself.
 
>[...]

>  In my mind there is no good reason for this fix to go into Sid
> and then sit there until the dependencies are satisfied for that version
> number.

Well, that is the standard flow. I hear you that it isn't convenient for
you but it is standard.


>[...]
 
> Testing is what the biggest portion of Debian users have on their
> desktops.

Do you have any documentation to support this, I do understand how you
might think that reading lists and forums but I've never seen any
documentation of version percentages for desktops.

>[...]

>  Is the Debian development process in that much trouble, i.e. short of
>  help, or
> have such unreasonable versioning rules that something this simple can't
> be fixed promptly?
>

Following the standards is not necessarily an indication of "being in
trouble", it's an indication of following standards and flow. "Stable" is
the version that is stable, probably in some sense that stability is a
result of the Debian "flow".

This isn't important for your question but I personally don't like to
automount, I prefer to mount as I choose and as needed. YMMV.

I think I do understand your frustration, and you've got a good example to
work with but standards are standards and the flow has given us very good
stable Debian for many years, I want it to remain the same.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: bug #350639

2009-05-18 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon,18.May.09, 00:48:44, Matteo Riva wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Javier Barroso  wrote:
> 
> > It seems resolved in unstable,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525183
> 
> I have rebuilt the package from source as suggested by a user in that
> bug report, but now the update manager flags gnome-volume-manager as
> needing an update.  How can I avoid this?

Add a new changelog entry with a higher version (by appending something 
like '+local' to the version string). You can use 'dch' for this.

If you use aptitude you can also use the 'forbid-version' command ('F' 
in interactive mode).

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: bug #350639

2009-05-17 Thread Freddy Freeloader

Matteo Riva wrote:

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Javier Barroso  wrote:

  

It seems resolved in unstable,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525183



I have rebuilt the package from source as suggested by a user in that
bug report, but now the update manager flags gnome-volume-manager as
needing an update.  How can I avoid this?
  
You might try using apt-pinning.  I'm not sure if it will work though as 
they are both the same version.  I just use the auto-update wizard and 
uncheck that box before allowing it to proceed. 


Thanks.


  



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: bug #350639

2009-05-17 Thread Freddy Freeloader

Javier Barroso wrote:

Hi,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Freddy Freeloader  wrote:
  

I'd like to point this bug out as it has been around now for 3 1/2 months
with no official resolution.  What's worse is that this bug was caused by
the Debian gnome-volume-manager maintainer.  Nobody else is responsible for
it.  He disabled automount when he compiled the gnome-volume-manager
package.


It seems resolved in unstable,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525183

I think maintainer forgot about dup (linking) these bugs.

They are working in transition to gnome 2.26, so we should have patient.
  
Ummm  It took me approximately 5 minutes to download the source, 
make the changes in debian-rules, and compile a new package.  I can 
count on one hand the number of Debian package I have created, so, it 
can't take any longer for an experienced developer to do the same thing  
than it did for me.


I also think that waiting 3 1/2 months for a 5 minute fix before 
complaining is being patient. 

Regards,

  



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: bug #350639

2009-05-17 Thread Matteo Riva
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Javier Barroso  wrote:

> It seems resolved in unstable,
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525183

I have rebuilt the package from source as suggested by a user in that
bug report, but now the update manager flags gnome-volume-manager as
needing an update.  How can I avoid this?

Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: BUG: ... kernel NULL pointer reference ... udevadm timeout

2009-05-17 Thread Bram Vromans

In-Reply-To=<20090322054558.gc13...@hamsu.tarvainen.info> (sorry my Yahoo-mail 
doesn't seem to support the in-reply-to field in the header).

Tapani,

I had exactly the same problem on a fresh Lenny install on an (old) Dell 
Latitude Cpi D266XT. The following worked for me:

add a line with "blacklist snd_cs4232" to the file /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.

I think on my computer the linux/Lenny incorrectly loads the snd_cs4232 module 
where it probably should load the snd_cs4236 module and this leads to a 3 min. 
freeze. Am now in the midst of setting up sound according to 
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=90869.

Good luck,
Bram


  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: bug #350639

2009-05-17 Thread Javier Barroso
Hi,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Freddy Freeloader  wrote:
> I'd like to point this bug out as it has been around now for 3 1/2 months
> with no official resolution.  What's worse is that this bug was caused by
> the Debian gnome-volume-manager maintainer.  Nobody else is responsible for
> it.  He disabled automount when he compiled the gnome-volume-manager
> package.
It seems resolved in unstable,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525183

I think maintainer forgot about dup (linking) these bugs.

They are working in transition to gnome 2.26, so we should have patient.

Regards,


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: BUG: Problem while booting Debian with LVDS connector instead of VGA

2009-05-05 Thread Jerome BENOIT

Hello,

I do not if it is related but just in case.

With some MacMini, at least old ones, this issue exists as well:
this is not a linux issue but a bootcamp issue.

hth,
Jerome

User Debian wrote:

Hello,

I have a problem that I meet each time I boot Linux on an embedded 
computer.


Configuration:
Embedded PC : ECM-LX800
Screen: LVDS (and not VGA)
Linux: Debian ETCH version 2.6.18-6-686

The problem comes after GRUB gives the instruction on which partition to 
boot, BUT before that Linux kernel is loaded.


Noticed facts:
1- in short-cutting the VGA connector (i.e. pin 5 and 12 strapped 
together), which simulates the presence of a VGA display attached to the 
PC, Linux boots normally. The video signal is indeed sent to the LVDS 
output.


2- Linux installation was proceeded with success, but with the VGA 
connector connected to an external display as described in item 1.


3- When the VGA connector is free from any connector or from any strap 
between pins 5 and 12, after GRUB has started: the display becomes then 
black. Linux kernel is not loaded.


Question: Is there a configuration file to modify before the kernel is 
loaded to tell Linux not to take into account the VGA connector, but 
instead to send straight the video signal on the LVDS output, and then 
to boot normally ?


Many thanks in advance,

Best regards,

Eric




--
Jerome BENOIT
jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Bug#525071: 2.2.4-1+b1 automatically rebuilt against libcrypto++8 segfaults on start

2009-04-30 Thread Elias Benali
> I’m CC'ing debian-user in case there are people with i386/unstable/amule
> who can confirm or deny the segfault. Please CC 525...@bugs.debian.org
> if you do so.
>
> Also, do you get any kind of backtrace, or can obtain one?

I can confirm this one, it crashes with a SIGSEGV.
Happens with the daemon as well as the UI.

Running unstable, i386:

$ gdb amuled
GNU gdb 6.8-debian
(gdb) run
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb77ce6d0 (LWP 18004)]
0x24938a6c in ?? ()
(gdb) backtrace
#0  0x24938a6c in ?? ()
#1  0x7b299b74 in ?? ()
#2  0x1220 in ?? ()
#3  0xb7eb6836 in CryptoPP::IteratedHashBase::TruncatedFinal
() from /usr/lib/libcrypto++.so.8
#4  0xb7ee5c88 in CryptoPP::RandomPool::IncorporateEntropy () from
/usr/lib/libcrypto++.so.8
#5  0xb7ed94ba in CryptoPP::AutoSeededRandomPool::Reseed () from
/usr/lib/libcrypto++.so.8
#6  0x081b1e1c in ?? ()
#7  0x081d108d in ?? ()
#8  0x0806bf00 in std::locale::locale ()
#9  0x0823c3f4 in ?? ()
#10 0xbf952648 in ?? ()
#11 0x080696bc in _init ()
Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#522358: AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so failed

2009-04-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:20:32 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:

> I wonder how to stop this error.
>  (EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so failed 
> (/usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or 
> directory)
>  (EE) GLX: could not load software renderer
>  (II) GLX: no usable GL providers found for screen 0
> 
> I don't use my computer to render anything fancy, so perhaps it is
> assuming that I have certain packages installed.

And you're sending this to an unrelated bug report because...?

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#525071: 2.2.4-1+b1 automatically rebuilt against libcrypto++8 segfaults on start

2009-04-21 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Втр, 2009-04-21 at 23:50 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Stanislav Maslovski (Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:37:09 +0400):
> 
> > Package: amule
> > Version: 2.2.4-1+b1
> > Severity: normal
> 
> > For your information: after todays upgrade to automatically rebuilt
> > amule 2.2.4-1+b1 it segfaults on start. The problem seems to be related
> > with libcrypto++8, as returning back to 2.2.4-1 built with libcrypto++7
> > solves the problem. 
> 
> I’ve been running 2.2.4-1+b1 myself since available for several days,
> and in fact I did built amule locally against libcrypto++8 before the
> libcrypto++ maintainer uploaded the new version to unstable. However,
> I’m on amd64 and not i386.
> 
> I’m CC'ing debian-user in case there are people with i386/unstable/amule
> who can confirm or deny the segfault. Please CC 525...@bugs.debian.org
> if you do so.
> 
> Also, do you get any kind of backtrace, or can obtain one?

Not sure that it helps, but here is it:

% gdb amule
GNU gdb 6.8-debian
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later

This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show
copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"...
(no debugging symbols found)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/amule 
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
---Type  to continue, or q  to quit---
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
---Type  to continue, or q  to quit---
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[New Thread 0xb6761970 (LWP 17354)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb6761970 (LWP 17354)]
0x36f51a11 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x36f51a11 in ?? ()
#1  0xccbc1c43 in ?? ()
#2  0x1220 in ?? ()
#3  0xb7da6836 in CryptoPP::IteratedHashBase::TruncatedFinal () from /usr/lib/libcrypto
++.so.8
#4  0xb7dd5c88 in CryptoPP::RandomPool::IncorporateEntropy ()
   from /usr/lib/libcrypto++.so.8
#5  0xb7dc94ba in CryptoPP::AutoSeededRandomPool::Reseed ()
   from /usr/lib/libcrypto++.so.8
#6  0x0823645c in ?? ()
#7  0x082c1f1d in ?? ()
#8  0x08080f34 in wxGenericListCtrl::SetItemPtrData ()
#9  0x083fa364 in ?? ()
#10 0xbfb418e8 in ?? ()
#11 0x0807e5c0 in _init ()
Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC
(gdb) 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#525071: 2.2.4-1+b1 automatically rebuilt against libcrypto++8 segfaults on start

2009-04-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Stanislav Maslovski (Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:37:09 +0400):

> Package: amule
> Version: 2.2.4-1+b1
> Severity: normal

> For your information: after todays upgrade to automatically rebuilt
> amule 2.2.4-1+b1 it segfaults on start. The problem seems to be related
> with libcrypto++8, as returning back to 2.2.4-1 built with libcrypto++7
> solves the problem. 

I’ve been running 2.2.4-1+b1 myself since available for several days,
and in fact I did built amule locally against libcrypto++8 before the
libcrypto++ maintainer uploaded the new version to unstable. However,
I’m on amd64 and not i386.

I’m CC'ing debian-user in case there are people with i386/unstable/amule
who can confirm or deny the segfault. Please CC 525...@bugs.debian.org
if you do so.

Also, do you get any kind of backtrace, or can obtain one?

Cheers,

-- 
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug in aptitude?

2009-04-16 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-04-16 18:56 +0200, Ben wrote:

> installation of package sendmail => http://rafb.net/p/CyyCc011.html
> purge of package sendmail => http://rafb.net/p/L9QeCU60.html

Please include such output in your mail, so that people don't have to
jump through hoops to read (and possibly cite) it.

> why does aptitude not remove all packages installed? The packages
> sendmail-base, sendmail-bin, sendmail-cf aren't depencies for any
> other package installed.
>
> Immediately after i installed sendmail i purged it, so the packages
> left behind are NOT depencies!

Probably you have some package that recommends mail-transport-agent
which is provided by sendmail-bin, so aptitude keeps it. The command

$ aptitude why sendmail-bin

will give you more information.  Note that aptitude only removes
automatically installed packages that are recommended by other packages
if the options Apt::Install-Recommends and Aptitude::Keep-Recommends are
both set to false.  See the aptitude user manual for more information.

Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#519028: How do the pros keep up with the latest kernel?

2009-04-08 Thread Thorny
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:52:57 +0800, jidanni posted:

>> How do the pros keep up with the latest kernel? Depending on
>> linux-image-686 isn't working these days.
> (it depends on a package no longer available)
> 
> $ cat sources.list
> deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-free deb
> http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free

Oh great, an answer for a question I didn't ask from a poster who doesn't
define his terms and doesn't describe clearly what question is being asked
or for what branch. 

You should have a look at this, jidanni. You should also stop sending
unrequested copies.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#519028: How do the pros keep up with the latest kernel?

2009-04-07 Thread jidanni
> How do the pros keep up with the latest kernel? Depending on
> linux-image-686 isn't working these days.
(it depends on a package no longer available)

$ cat sources.list
deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.tw.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#519028: How do the pros keep up with the latest kernel?

2009-04-07 Thread Thorny
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:40:19 +0800, jidanni posted:

> How do the pros keep up with the latest kernel? Depending on
> linux-image-686 isn't working these days.
> 
> # aptitude -F %p search ?obsolete | xargs -n 1 echo aptitude why|sh -x +
> aptitude why linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 i   linux-image-686 Depends
> linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519028

Which "pros" are you talking about?

Which release are you running, "stable" or?

Do you have hardware that doesn't work with your kernel version?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug counts in Current and next Release

2009-03-31 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:29:25AM -0400, S Scharf wrote:
> I've been looking at the  release critical bug
> chartand was wondering why
> the current release has it's
> bug count increasing at the same rate as the next release. In the past, the
> current release stayed at
> a lower bug count for a while before increasing.

Quite a few new bugs are also marked as applicable to older versions and
when they are fixed they only get fixed in the new version. In many cases 
the new bug has indeed affected the older version. But in quite a few 
other cases it doesn't.

Thus the bugs count for the stable release is skewed.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il || a Mutt's
tzaf...@cohens.org.il ||  best
ICQ# 16849754 || friend


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug counts in Current and next Release

2009-03-31 Thread Dotan Cohen
2009/3/31 S Scharf :
> I've been looking at the  release critical bug chart and was wondering why
> the current release has it's
> bug count increasing at the same rate as the next release. In the past, the
> current release stayed at
> a lower bug count for a while before increasing.
>
> Stuart
>
>

>From that same page:
"
Recent changes
2 release-critical bugs were closed and 5 were opened.
"

So long as more bugs are being filed than fixed, the outstanding bug
count will keep increasing.

-- 
Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-24 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-02-24 09:12 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:

> Thanks, I had permissions.default.image = 1.
> Therefore, I guess the problem is related to the SVG viewer
> adobesvg-3.01, since so much of Wikipedia is displayed as svg?

Probably.

> Although the error message says
>
> failed to initialize shared library
> /home/peter/downloads/adobesvg-3.0/libNPSVG3.so
>
> I am unable to find the setting in Iceweasel that is linking to this
> (at the moment there is no plugin for SVG, do you still need this?

Iceweasel displays SVGs without any plugin or extension.  But not all
features are implemented, see
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/SVG_in_Firefox.

Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-24 Thread Peter Robinson

Sven Joachim wrote:

On 2009-02-23 23:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:

  

I have noticed that Iceweasel (i.e., firefox, version 3.06 under
debian sid) does not display the graphics from Wikipedia, although as
far as I can tell images from all other websites are shown
correctly. That is, instead of the images on a page like

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasco_da_Gama

one sees only blank white areas.



What is the value of permissions.default.image in about:config ?  If it
is set to 3, Iceweasel will only load images from the same server as the
website, which reduces advertising but also the usability of Wikipedia.

See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Permissions.default.image for more
information.

Sven


  

Thanks, I had permissions.default.image = 1.
Therefore, I guess the problem is related to the SVG viewer 
adobesvg-3.01, since so much of Wikipedia is displayed as svg? Although 
the error message says


failed to initialize shared library 
/home/peter/downloads/adobesvg-3.0/libNPSVG3.so


I am unable to find the setting in Iceweasel that is linking to this (at 
the moment there is no plugin for SVG, do you still need this?


Thanks Peter


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-23 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-02-23 23:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:

> I have noticed that Iceweasel (i.e., firefox, version 3.06 under
> debian sid) does not display the graphics from Wikipedia, although as
> far as I can tell images from all other websites are shown
> correctly. That is, instead of the images on a page like
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasco_da_Gama
>
> one sees only blank white areas.

What is the value of permissions.default.image in about:config ?  If it
is set to 3, Iceweasel will only load images from the same server as the
website, which reduces advertising but also the usability of Wikipedia.

See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Permissions.default.image for more
information.

Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-23 Thread Ron Johnson

On 02/23/2009 05:28 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
[snip]


pe...@peter:~$ iceweasel
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
/home/peter/downloads/adobesvg-3.0/libNPSVG3.so [libgtksuperwin.so: Kann 
die Shared-Object-Datei nicht öffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht 
gefunden]

** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
/home/peter/downloads/adobesvg-3.0/libNPSVG3.so [libgtksuperwin.so: Kann 
die Shared-Object-Datei nicht öffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht 
gefunden]




adobesvg-3.0 that's pretty old.  adobesvg-3.01 is 4+ years old.

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

The feeling of disgust at seeing a human female in a Relationship
with a chimp male is Homininphobia, and you should be ashamed of
yourself.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-23 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On 24 February 2009 00:28:56 Peter Robinson wrote:
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> > On 23 February 2009 23:54:18 Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>> On 02/23/2009 04:32 PM, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>  On 23 February 2009 23:23:55 Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> >
> > I have noticed that Iceweasel (i.e., firefox, version 3.06 under
> > debian sid) does not display the graphics from Wikipedia, although as
> > far as I can tell images from all other websites are shown correctly.
> > That is, instead of the images on a page like
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasco_da_Gama
> >
> > one sees only blank white areas.
> >
> > Has anyone else had this problem?
> >
> > CHeers Peter
> 
>  In squeeze, iceweasel 3.06 too, everything is showing OK on the page
>  you mentioned.
>  Thierry
> >>>
> >>> AOL!  In Sid IW 3.0.6-1 all the images (of VdG, maps of Africa, etc)
> >>> all appear.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe OP has some misconfigured plugins?
> >>
> >> Any ideas what plugins could be doing this? I have Java, Flash, some
> >> plugins for videas streams, adobe reader, but nothing too unusual...
> >> -Peter
> >
> > Can you try to start iceweasel from a command line? It may show
> > something...
>
> Right! Here it is (the German text says Cannot find the shared object
> file libgtksuperwin.so). I have libgtk2.12 installed. As far as I can
> see there is no package called libgtksuperwin...
>
>
> pe...@peter:~$ iceweasel
> LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
> /home/peter/downloads/adobesvg-3.0/libNPSVG3.so [libgtksuperwin.so: Kann
> die Shared-Object-Datei nicht öffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
> gefunden] ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
> ** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
> LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
> /home/peter/downloads/adobesvg-3.0/libNPSVG3.so [libgtksuperwin.so: Kann
> die Shared-Object-Datei nicht öffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
> gefunden]

Good, now I have to leave it to someone more knowledgable than I. Sorry, good 
luck...


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-23 Thread Peter Robinson

Thierry Chatelet wrote:

On 23 February 2009 23:54:18 Peter Robinson wrote:
  

Ron Johnson wrote:


On 02/23/2009 04:32 PM, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
  

On 23 February 2009 23:23:55 Peter Robinson wrote:


Dear all,


I have noticed that Iceweasel (i.e., firefox, version 3.06 under debian
sid) does not display the graphics from Wikipedia, although as far as I
can tell images from all other websites are shown correctly. That is,
instead of the images on a page like

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasco_da_Gama

one sees only blank white areas.

Has anyone else had this problem?

CHeers Peter
  

In squeeze, iceweasel 3.06 too, everything is showing OK on the page
you mentioned.
Thierry


AOL!  In Sid IW 3.0.6-1 all the images (of VdG, maps of Africa, etc)
all appear.

Maybe OP has some misconfigured plugins?
  

Any ideas what plugins could be doing this? I have Java, Flash, some
plugins for videas streams, adobe reader, but nothing too unusual...
-Peter



Can you try to start iceweasel from a command line? It may show something...


  
Right! Here it is (the German text says Cannot find the shared object 
file libgtksuperwin.so). I have libgtk2.12 installed. As far as I can 
see there is no package called libgtksuperwin...



pe...@peter:~$ iceweasel
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
/home/peter/downloads/adobesvg-3.0/libNPSVG3.so [libgtksuperwin.so: Kann 
die Shared-Object-Datei nicht öffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden]

** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library 
/home/peter/downloads/adobesvg-3.0/libNPSVG3.so [libgtksuperwin.so: Kann 
die Shared-Object-Datei nicht öffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden]








--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-23 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On 23 February 2009 23:54:18 Peter Robinson wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 02/23/2009 04:32 PM, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> >> On 23 February 2009 23:23:55 Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have noticed that Iceweasel (i.e., firefox, version 3.06 under debian
> >>> sid) does not display the graphics from Wikipedia, although as far as I
> >>> can tell images from all other websites are shown correctly. That is,
> >>> instead of the images on a page like
> >>>
> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasco_da_Gama
> >>>
> >>> one sees only blank white areas.
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone else had this problem?
> >>>
> >>> CHeers Peter
> >>
> >> In squeeze, iceweasel 3.06 too, everything is showing OK on the page
> >> you mentioned.
> >> Thierry
> >
> > AOL!  In Sid IW 3.0.6-1 all the images (of VdG, maps of Africa, etc)
> > all appear.
> >
> > Maybe OP has some misconfigured plugins?
>
> Any ideas what plugins could be doing this? I have Java, Flash, some
> plugins for videas streams, adobe reader, but nothing too unusual...
> -Peter

Can you try to start iceweasel from a command line? It may show something...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-23 Thread Peter Robinson

Ron Johnson wrote:

On 02/23/2009 04:32 PM, Thierry Chatelet wrote:

On 23 February 2009 23:23:55 Peter Robinson wrote:

Dear all,


I have noticed that Iceweasel (i.e., firefox, version 3.06 under debian
sid) does not display the graphics from Wikipedia, although as far as I
can tell images from all other websites are shown correctly. That is,
instead of the images on a page like

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasco_da_Gama

one sees only blank white areas.

Has anyone else had this problem?

CHeers Peter


In squeeze, iceweasel 3.06 too, everything is showing OK on the page 
you mentioned.

Thierry



AOL!  In Sid IW 3.0.6-1 all the images (of VdG, maps of Africa, etc) 
all appear.


Maybe OP has some misconfigured plugins?

Any ideas what plugins could be doing this? I have Java, Flash, some 
plugins for videas streams, adobe reader, but nothing too unusual...

-Peter


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-23 Thread Ron Johnson

On 02/23/2009 04:32 PM, Thierry Chatelet wrote:

On 23 February 2009 23:23:55 Peter Robinson wrote:

Dear all,


I have noticed that Iceweasel (i.e., firefox, version 3.06 under debian
sid) does not display the graphics from Wikipedia, although as far as I
can tell images from all other websites are shown correctly. That is,
instead of the images on a page like

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasco_da_Gama

one sees only blank white areas.

Has anyone else had this problem?

CHeers Peter


In squeeze, iceweasel 3.06 too, everything is showing OK on the page you 
mentioned.

Thierry



AOL!  In Sid IW 3.0.6-1 all the images (of VdG, maps of Africa, etc) 
all appear.


Maybe OP has some misconfigured plugins?

--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

The feeling of disgust at seeing a human female in a Relationship
with a chimp male is Homininphobia, and you should be ashamed of
yourself.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org




Re: Bug in Iceweasel: Graphics not displayed

2009-02-23 Thread Thierry Chatelet
On 23 February 2009 23:23:55 Peter Robinson wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
> I have noticed that Iceweasel (i.e., firefox, version 3.06 under debian
> sid) does not display the graphics from Wikipedia, although as far as I
> can tell images from all other websites are shown correctly. That is,
> instead of the images on a page like
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasco_da_Gama
>
> one sees only blank white areas.
>
> Has anyone else had this problem?
>
> CHeers Peter

In squeeze, iceweasel 3.06 too, everything is showing OK on the page you 
mentioned.
Thierry


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >