Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 22:39:46, Peter Tynan wrote: On 21 February 2011 21:24, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe this is mutt specific, but if I just delete the mail from Inbox in All Mail the message is still marked as unread (a.k.a new). If I mark it as read and sync, then it's also marked as read in All Mail. I assume Gmail takes the delete from Inbox command quite literally and doesn't also mark the message as read first. I guess I can write a macro to remap 'd' to toggle-newsync-mailboxdelete-message instead... The behaviour for expunge can be set in the IMAP bit of the Gmail settings. That's not what I mean. Anyway, I solved this with these two macros: macro pager d sync-mailboxdelete-message macro index d toggle-newsync-mailboxdelete-message but I'm considering using a dedicated key than 'd' because this is actually archiving and map d to a move-to-gmail-trash macro. Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 20:26:45, Petrus Validus wrote: Is there a way for this to be disabled and subsequently have messages be displayed in their specific folders...or is this just how Gmail works? This one of the better innovation brought by Gmail, if used correctly. I interpret the if used correctly bit to mean using the GMail web interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt. Am I correct in this interpretation? No, I mean, AFAICT, IMAP was not designed for this paradigm (same message present in different folders/tags/views/whatever). Mutt with the correct macros and folder-hooks can be bent into adapting to Gmail's style, mostly... I presume plugins for Icedove can be (already are?) written. Functionality similar to Gmail's can be seen in Outlook's search folders, Opera (forgot the name), notmuch, sup, ..., each with its own set of problems and/or limitations. Unfortunately it's not very usable via IMAP. I read somewhere in my travels across the Web today while researching this that Google only has partial implementation of IMAP. I don't know how accurate that is since I don't the underlying details of this protocol. I didn't notice any lack of functionality, but I doubt I'm using the full functionality of IMAP. Example: How do I tell mutt to tag the message as read in All Mail when I delete it (archive in Gmail speak) from Inbox? There's a Gmail Labs thing that has extensive IMAP controls which will do that. Another poster suggested that to me. Unless I'm missing something it does *not* do what I want, but I worked around it with mutt macros (see my other post). Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
I interpret the if used correctly bit to mean using the GMail web interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt. Am I correct in this interpretation? No, I mean, AFAICT, IMAP was not designed for this paradigm (same message present in different folders/tags/views/whatever). I've also come to that conclusion. I think we're saying the same thing just different words (maybe?). It looks like to me this paradigm was designed for use on Gmail's own interface and that's it. Mutt with the correct macros and folder-hooks can be bent into adapting to Gmail's style, mostly... I'm still new to Mutt so I will have to look into this much further, not to mention doing some manual reading. Unless I'm missing something it does *not* do what I want, but I worked around it with mutt macros (see my other post). Heh...I noticed that too. I'll take a look at your post. -- Petrus Validus petrus.vali...@gmail.com If there isn't a way, I make one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110222141812.GA5365@Neuron.8EEWS
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Petrus Validus wrote: I interpret the if used correctly bit to mean using the GMail web interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt. Am I correct in this interpretation? No, I mean, AFAICT, IMAP was not designed for this paradigm (same message present in different folders/tags/views/whatever). I've also come to that conclusion. I think we're saying the same thing just different words (maybe?). It looks like to me this paradigm was designed for use on Gmail's own interface and that's it. Mutt with the correct macros and folder-hooks can be bent into adapting to Gmail's style, mostly... I'm still new to Mutt so I will have to look into this much further, not to mention doing some manual reading. Unless I'm missing something it does *not* do what I want, but I worked around it with mutt macros (see my other post). Heh...I noticed that too. I'll take a look at your post. With the google labs thing, the delete/move to bin options only work if the message is only in a single IMAP folder thus it will never work if you are subscribed to the All Mail folder (unless it is only in the all mail folder), if you go to the labels section in the GMail settings you can unsubscribed All Mail as an IMAP folder. -- (\___/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your ()_() signature to help him gain world domination. gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/happy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.neb.2.00.110045570.23...@bgnxh.serrfuryy.bet
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Ma, 22 feb 11, 09:18:12, Petrus Validus wrote: I interpret the if used correctly bit to mean using the GMail web interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt. Am I correct in this interpretation? No, I mean, AFAICT, IMAP was not designed for this paradigm (same message present in different folders/tags/views/whatever). I've also come to that conclusion. I think we're saying the same thing just different words (maybe?). It looks like to me this paradigm was designed for use on Gmail's own interface and that's it. It's not impossible, but you'd have to (re)design the IMAP client around Gmail. Example: The client only ever downloads full messages in a local copy of 'All Mail', 'Spam' and 'Trash'. It the user wants to see messages in 'Inbox' (a.k.a messages with the 'Inbox' tag) it only downloads the headers and compares by msg-id to the messages in 'All Mail'. I wonder if the clients designed by Google work this way... Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
There is effectively a list reply feature in gmail. Hit Reply to all and debian-user@lists.debian.org appears in the cc field. For this reply I have removed the To address and just kept the cc address. However I use Icedove for newsgroups and also a gmail account where I automatically archive the debian user posts. This allows me to use the gmail search feature if I want to look for something. If I find it with gmail I can reply there or jump into Icedove to find the thread. I find Icedove's search is poor, and if you find a post to view it opens in a new window rather than finding it in the main window where the thread could be seen. Russell On 21 February 2011 06:57, Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net wrote: On 02/21/2011 12:17 AM, Peter Tynan wrote: On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:54:27 -0600 From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:49 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org I keep my current D-User folder (relatively) small by having maildrop filter emails into quarterly folders. Does that not make searching a pain in the posterior? A bit. (It just occurred to me that such filtering isn't useful with gmail... ) -- The normal condition of mankind is tyranny and misery. Milton Friedman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d620ce2.5010...@cox.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimblqwyyl8p0z6f3hrqvbobk_5d2mdkxlu0q...@mail.gmail.com
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use Google's IMAPs interface. I use Evolution and Mutt with Google's IMAP interface. It works nicely but I've noticed this quirky behavior when using a client via IMAP. My messages appear in multiple places at the same time. For instance I'll have new mail display in Inbox, All Mail (where *everything* is), and then in the individual labels (or folders). Pretty funky. At first I just thought it was an Evolution thing, but I've tested it with Outlook 2003, Thunderbird, and Mutt. I am assuming that each message isn't actually being delivered three times and just listed in different folders within the account. Is there a way for this to be disabled and subsequently have messages be displayed in their specific folders...or is this just how Gmail works? -- Petrus Validus petrus.vali...@gmail.com If there isn't a way, I make one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110221175956.GA10784@Neuron.8EEWS
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 12:59:56, Petrus Validus wrote: Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use Google's IMAPs interface. I use Evolution and Mutt with Google's IMAP interface. It works nicely but I've noticed this quirky behavior when using a client via IMAP. My messages appear in multiple places at the same time. For instance I'll have new mail display in Inbox, All Mail (where *everything* is), and then in the individual labels (or folders). Pretty funky. At first I just thought it was an Evolution thing, but I've tested it with Outlook 2003, Thunderbird, and Mutt. I am assuming that each message isn't actually being delivered three times and just listed in different folders within the account. Is there a way for this to be disabled and subsequently have messages be displayed in their specific folders...or is this just how Gmail works? This one of the better innovation brought by Gmail, if used correctly. Unfortunately it's not very usable via IMAP. Example: How do I tell mutt to tag the message as read in All Mail when I delete it (archive in Gmail speak) from Inbox? Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Petrus Validus wrote: Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use Google's IMAPs interface. I use Evolution and Mutt with Google's IMAP interface. It works nicely but I've noticed this quirky behavior when using a client via IMAP. My messages appear in multiple places at the same time. For instance I'll have new mail display in Inbox, All Mail (where *everything* is), and then in the individual labels (or folders). Pretty funky. At first I just thought it was an Evolution thing, but I've tested it with Outlook 2003, Thunderbird, and Mutt. I am assuming that each message isn't actually being delivered three times and just listed in different folders within the account. Is there a way for this to be disabled and subsequently have messages be displayed in their specific folders...or is this just how Gmail works? Although the powerful filtering abilities of Pine/Alpine was one of the things that attracted me to it that was over a decade ago, today I let gmail do the filtering... 'All Mail' - I'm not subscribed to this (imap?) folder and by its nature there is not a lot you do to keep mail out of it. 'Inbox' - one of the options when creating a gmail filter (to apply a tag/move to imap folder) is for the message to be archived (i.e. skip the Inbox) - I'm thinking this is the option you are looking for? -- (\___/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your ()_() signature to help him gain world domination. gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/happy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.neb.2.00.1102212015420.18...@bgnxh.serrfuryy.bet
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Lu, 21 feb 11, 12:59:56, Petrus Validus wrote: This one of the better innovation brought by Gmail, if used correctly. Unfortunately it's not very usable via IMAP. Example: How do I tell mutt to tag the message as read in All Mail when I delete it (archive in Gmail speak) from Inbox? My solution (not sure if solution is the right word bu hey ho...) is that nothing is untagged (remember that 'Inbox' is just a tag). If something is deleted it is gone, if I want to keep something but not have it littering up my Inbox a tag is applied and it is the archived. On a slightly different note does anybody know the correct FCC to move sent items to Googles 'sent' folder, at the moment I have the somewhat unsatisfactory arrangement of stuff sent by Alpine ending up in a separate folder. -- (\___/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your ()_() signature to help him gain world domination. gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/happy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.neb.2.00.1102212040260.18...@bgnxh.serrfuryy.bet
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 20:49:49, Peter Tynan wrote: On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Lu, 21 feb 11, 12:59:56, Petrus Validus wrote: This one of the better innovation brought by Gmail, if used correctly. Unfortunately it's not very usable via IMAP. Example: How do I tell mutt to tag the message as read in All Mail when I delete it (archive in Gmail speak) from Inbox? My solution (not sure if solution is the right word bu hey ho...) is that nothing is untagged (remember that 'Inbox' is just a tag). If something is deleted it is gone, if I want to keep something but not have it littering up my Inbox a tag is applied and it is the archived. Hmm, as far as I understand, a message is always present in [Gmail]/All Mail', unless moved to [Gmail]/Trash or [Gmail]/Spam. New mail (not filtered) goes to my Inbox. If I want to get rid of it for good I move it to [Gmail]/Trash, but if I want to archive it I just delete the Inbox tag for it, since the mail still has the All Mail tag. Maybe this is mutt specific, but if I just delete the mail from Inbox in All Mail the message is still marked as unread (a.k.a new). If I mark it as read and sync, then it's also marked as read in All Mail. I assume Gmail takes the delete from Inbox command quite literally and doesn't also mark the message as read first. I guess I can write a macro to remap 'd' to toggle-newsync-mailboxdelete-message instead... On a slightly different note does anybody know the correct FCC to move sent items to Googles 'sent' folder, at the moment I have the somewhat unsatisfactory arrangement of stuff sent by Alpine ending up in a separate folder. If you send via Gmail's SMTP you always have a copy in Gmail's sent, so it should be enough to tell alpine not to save its own copy. Regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote: If you send via Gmail's SMTP you always have a copy in Gmail's sent, so it should be enough to tell alpine not to save its own copy. Check the headers - I use a local sendmail. I've been doing some digging and it is in a sub-folder named Google Mail, the sub-folder used to be named Gmail but a while ago that stopped working so I think I now have a fix :) -- (\___/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your ()_() signature to help him gain world domination. gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/happy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.neb.2.00.1102212135210.18...@bgnxh.serrfuryy.bet
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On 21 February 2011 21:24, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe this is mutt specific, but if I just delete the mail from Inbox in All Mail the message is still marked as unread (a.k.a new). If I mark it as read and sync, then it's also marked as read in All Mail. I assume Gmail takes the delete from Inbox command quite literally and doesn't also mark the message as read first. I guess I can write a macro to remap 'd' to toggle-newsync-mailboxdelete-message instead... The behaviour for expunge can be set in the IMAP bit of the Gmail settings. -- (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your ()_() signature to help him gain world domination. gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/happy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikWcZvq8Nz0xFAaObrLVRXrkLL=-hd8wyrdk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
Is there a way for this to be disabled and subsequently have messages be displayed in their specific folders...or is this just how Gmail works? This one of the better innovation brought by Gmail, if used correctly. I interpret the if used correctly bit to mean using the GMail web interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt. Am I correct in this interpretation? Unfortunately it's not very usable via IMAP. I read somewhere in my travels across the Web today while researching this that Google only has partial implementation of IMAP. I don't know how accurate that is since I don't the underlying details of this protocol. Example: How do I tell mutt to tag the message as read in All Mail when I delete it (archive in Gmail speak) from Inbox? There's a Gmail Labs thing that has extensive IMAP controls which will do that. Another poster suggested that to me. -- Petrus Validus petrus.vali...@gmail.com If there isn't a way, I make one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110222012645.GA4861@Neuron.8EEWS
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
Hmm, as far as I understand, a message is always present in [Gmail]/All Mail', unless moved to [Gmail]/Trash or [Gmail]/Spam. New mail (not filtered) goes to my Inbox. If I want to get rid of it for good I move it to [Gmail]/Trash, but if I want to archive it I just delete the Inbox tag for it, since the mail still has the All Mail tag. Yes. The way Gmail works is different to say the least. Maybe this is mutt specific, but if I just delete the mail from Inbox in All Mail the message is still marked as unread (a.k.a new). I experience this same issue when using other clients, notably Evolution, Outlook, and Mutt. I end up with a lot of duplicate messages even though there is only one original message delivered to my Gmail account. This makes things confusing. -- Petrus Validus petrus.vali...@gmail.com If there isn't a way, I make one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110222013832.GB4861@Neuron.8EEWS
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:48 -0600 From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 04:03:05 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On 02/20/2011 09:42 PM, Heddle Weaver wrote: Got to get away from gmail. No list reply feature. Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use Google's IMAPs interface. I use Alpine but the important thing when using imap with gmail is to limit the size of the folder, I've something like 15,000+ messages tagged Debian in gmail and opening that lot up as folder using imap a) takes forever b) is enough to crash alpine on my shell account. Google labs have a feature that allows you to limit the size of an imap folder (I have it set to 2,000). -- (\___/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your ()_() signature to help him gain world domination. gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/happy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.neb.2.00.1102210458480.12...@bgnxh.serrfuryy.bet
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On 02/20/2011 11:01 PM, Peter Tynan wrote: On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:48 -0600 From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 04:03:05 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On 02/20/2011 09:42 PM, Heddle Weaver wrote: Got to get away from gmail. No list reply feature. Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use Google's IMAPs interface. I use Alpine but the important thing when using imap with gmail is to limit the size of the folder, I've something like 15,000+ messages tagged Debian in gmail and opening that lot up as folder using imap a) takes forever b) is enough to crash alpine on my shell account. Google labs have a feature that allows you to limit the size of an imap folder (I have it set to 2,000). I keep my current D-User folder (relatively) small by having maildrop filter emails into quarterly folders. -- The normal condition of mankind is tyranny and misery. Milton Friedman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d61fe13.4000...@cox.net
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:54:27 -0600 From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:49 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On 02/20/2011 11:01 PM, Peter Tynan wrote: On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:48 -0600 From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 04:03:05 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On 02/20/2011 09:42 PM, Heddle Weaver wrote: Got to get away from gmail. No list reply feature. Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use Google's IMAPs interface. I use Alpine but the important thing when using imap with gmail is I keep my current D-User folder (relatively) small by having maildrop filter emails into quarterly folders. -- (\___/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your ()_() signature to help him gain world domination. gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/happy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.neb.2.00.1102210603120.10...@bgnxh.serrfuryy.bet
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:54:27 -0600 From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:49 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org I keep my current D-User folder (relatively) small by having maildrop filter emails into quarterly folders. Does that not make searching a pain in the posterior? (nb: sorry, I think I may of accidently sent a half edited message) -- (\___/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your ()_() signature to help him gain world domination. gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/happy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.neb.2.00.1102210614110.17...@bgnxh.serrfuryy.bet
Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use)
On 02/21/2011 12:17 AM, Peter Tynan wrote: On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote: Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:54:27 -0600 From: Ron Johnson ron.l.john...@cox.net To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for firewall/router use) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:49 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org I keep my current D-User folder (relatively) small by having maildrop filter emails into quarterly folders. Does that not make searching a pain in the posterior? A bit. (It just occurred to me that such filtering isn't useful with gmail... ) -- The normal condition of mankind is tyranny and misery. Milton Friedman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d620ce2.5010...@cox.net
