General protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Hi all! A few minutes ago I just experienced a horrible crash on one of my computers with Debian Jessie: --- Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.832919] general protection fault: [#1] SMP Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.832946] Modules linked in: vhost_net vhost macvtap macvlan tun binfmt_misc nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc bridge stp llc snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_codec_generic arc4 rtl8187 nouveau kvm_amd ppdev eeprom_93cx6 kvm mac80211 pcspkr cfg80211 snd_hda_intel serio_raw mxm_wmi wmi video ttm snd_hda_controller edac_mce_amd edac_core drm_kms_helper rfkill snd_hda_codec k8temp drm joydev nv_tco i2c_algo_bit evdev snd_hwdep snd_pcm shpchp parport_pc snd_timer i2c_nforce2 snd parport soundcore processor asus_atk0110 button adt7475 hwmon_vid i2c_core firewire_sbp2 loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 dm_mod raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq raid1 md_mod sr_mod cdrom hid_generic usbhid hid sg sd_mod crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic crct10dif_common psmouse ohci_pci sata_sil24 forcedeth firewire_ohci firewire_core ata_generic crc_itu_t floppy ohci_hcd ehci_pci ehci_hcd pata_amd sata_nv 8139too 8139cp mii libata fan scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys usbcore usb_common Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833197] CPU: 1 PID: 22 Comm: khugepaged Not tainted 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833209] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M2N32-SLI DELUXE, BIOS ASUS M2N32-SLI DELUXE ACPI BIOS Revision 2205 03/02/2009 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833223] task: 8801b8b38b60 ti: 8801b8b44000 task.ti: 8801b8b44000 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833234] RIP: 0010:[] [] down_read+0x11/0x20 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833248] RSP: 0018:8801b8b478e0 EFLAGS: 00010246 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833256] RAX: 3553423839545239 RBX: 3553423839545239 RCX: Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833264] RDX: 0001 RSI: RDI: 3553423839545239 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833273] RBP: 8801b8b47950 R08: 8800ba69c200 R09: Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833281] R10: 8800ba69c000 R11: 0001 R12: Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833289] R13: R14: 8801 R15: 0001 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833299] FS: 7f92ef5f5700() GS:8801bfc8() knlGS: Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833308] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833315] CR2: 7f51b75d4000 CR3: 01813000 CR4: 07e0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833324] Stack: Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833328] 88005c5e8b80 8118ec20 ea0001ce4088 880199f9f538 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833341] ea0001ce4088 8801b8b479e0 0001 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833354] ea0001ce40a8 ea0001ce4088 811773ef 00010001 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833366] Call Trace: Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833375] [] ? rmap_walk_ksm+0x80/0x180 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833385] [] ? page_referenced+0x9f/0x110 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833394] [] ? __page_check_address+0x1c0/0x1c0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833403] [] ? page_get_anon_vma+0x70/0x70 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833414] [] ? shrink_active_list+0x1dd/0x380 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833423] [] ? shrink_lruvec+0x619/0x6a0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833432] [] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1cb/0x2f0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833441] [] ? try_to_wake_up+0x1cb/0x2f0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833450] [] ? shrink_zone+0x74/0x1b0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833459] [] ? do_try_to_free_pages+0x12d/0x520 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833469] [] ? try_to_free_pages+0xc5/0x190 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833478] [] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x726/0xb50 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833488] [] ? khugepaged+0x59f/0x11d0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833497] [] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833507] [] ? maybe_pmd_mkwrite+0x20/0x20 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833516] [] ? kthread+0xbd/0xe0 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833524] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833534] [] ? ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833543] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180 Oct 31 17:17:32 ss01 kernel: [694807.833550] Code: de 48 89 07 66 b8 00 02 c6 47 18 01 48 89 47 08 48 8b 7f 10 e9 e1 13 b8 ff 90 66 66 66 66 90 53 48 89 fb
Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP. Is this a kernel problem?
Hi guys, I have some frequently problem when run some applications using Debian 6.0.5-amd64. I did the fresh install today. Install some application, started use them and get this error on `dmesg`. At this time i noticed an application named firefox got freeze, not responding. [quote] $ dmesg [10756.194057] firefox: Corrupted page table at address 7f0fc100d3b8 [10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE 807b43e44067 [10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP [10756.194066] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:04.0/:02:00.0/class [10756.194069] CPU 0 [10756.194070] Modules linked in: snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss aes_x86_64 aes_generic xts gf128mul dm_crypt dm_mod fuse loop snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq snd_timer radeon snd_seq_device ttm drm_kms_helper drm snd i2c_algo_bit i2c_piix4 soundcore parport_pc pcspkr wmi psmouse serio_raw evdev button processor joydev i2c_core asus_atk0110 snd_page_alloc parport shpchp pci_hotplug ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 usbhid hid sd_mod crc_t10dif ata_generic ohci_hcd pata_atiixp ahci ehci_hcd libata usbcore r8169 nls_base thermal mii scsi_mod thermal_sys [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [10756.194108] Pid: 22833, comm: firefox Tainted: G D 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 System Product Name [10756.194110] RIP: 0033:[7f0fcf2f3e42] [7f0fcf2f3e42] 0x7f0fcf2f3e42 [10756.194116] RSP: 002b:7fff09a76958 EFLAGS: 00010287 [10756.194119] RAX: 7f0fb4e16d30 RBX: 7fff09a769f0 RCX: 7fff09a76a50 [10756.194121] RDX: 7f0fb4e16d30 RSI: 7f0fb4e16d30 RDI: 7f0fc100d350 [10756.194122] RBP: 7f0fbdf62240 R08: 0018 R09: 0018 [10756.194124] R10: 7fff09a76920 R11: 7f0fc6338000 R12: 7fff09a76a50 [10756.194125] R13: 7f0fb4e16d30 R14: 7f0fd2164301 R15: 7f0fd21e5820 [10756.194128] FS: 7f0fd3414720() GS:88000500() knlGS:f756c6d0 [10756.194129] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [10756.194131] CR2: 7f0fc100d3b8 CR3: 4d4da000 CR4: 000406f0 [10756.194132] DR0: DR1: DR2: [10756.194134] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 [10756.194136] Process firefox (pid: 22833, threadinfo 88004d41a000, task 88011b4a3880) [10756.194137] [10756.194138] RIP [7f0fcf2f3e42] 0x7f0fcf2f3e42 [10756.194141] RSP 7fff09a76958 [10756.194143] ---[ end trace ea1318a9dac02a4b ]--- [/quote] I use xfce as the windows manager and gdm as the display manager. my kernel: Linux hostname 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:00:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux What happen? Is this a kernel problem? What should I do? Regard, Marco
Re: Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP. Is this a kernel problem?
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 04:27:59 -0700, Morning Star wrote: I have some frequently problem when run some applications using Debian 6.0.5-amd64. I did the fresh install today. Install some application, started use them and get this error on `dmesg`. At this time i noticed an application named firefox got freeze, not responding. [quote] $ dmesg [10756.194057] firefox: Corrupted page table at address 7f0fc100d3b8 [10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE 807b43e44067 [10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP (...) I use xfce as the windows manager and gdm as the display manager. my kernel: Linux hostname 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:00:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux What happen? Is this a kernel problem? What should I do? I would report at Debian BTS. Meanwhile, for testing purposes, you can get a new kernel (from the backports or by self-compiling sources in kernel.org), install in paralell and check if the problem persists. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jubuhl$10r$1...@dough.gmane.org
Re: Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP. Is this a kernel problem?
Thanks, Camaleón. I would try to do both of them and make a comparison later. Regard, Marco On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 04:27:59 -0700, Morning Star wrote: I have some frequently problem when run some applications using Debian 6.0.5-amd64. I did the fresh install today. Install some application, started use them and get this error on `dmesg`. At this time i noticed an application named firefox got freeze, not responding. [quote] $ dmesg [10756.194057] firefox: Corrupted page table at address 7f0fc100d3b8 [10756.194061] PGD 4d55f067 PUD 4d551067 PMD 5e346067 PTE 807b43e44067 [10756.194064] Bad pagetable: 000d [#2] SMP (...) I use xfce as the windows manager and gdm as the display manager. my kernel: Linux hostname 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:00:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux What happen? Is this a kernel problem? What should I do? I would report at Debian BTS. Meanwhile, for testing purposes, you can get a new kernel (from the backports or by self-compiling sources in kernel.org), install in paralell and check if the problem persists. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jubuhl$10r$1...@dough.gmane.org
Re: Strange USB issue on 6.0.4 : kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:00:10 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: I have a HP external USB attached disk plugged into a USB port on my system. Periodically, every eight or twelve hours or so, and without any real pattern or trigger cause, I see the following message : root@aster:~# Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ... kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP (...) Being a kernel oops, I would report it in Debian BTS. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jkvbj3$hqr$1...@dough.gmane.org
Re: Strange USB issue on 6.0.4 : kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:00:10 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: I have a HP external USB attached disk plugged into a USB port on my system. Periodically, every eight or twelve hours or so, and without any real pattern or trigger cause, I see the following message : root@aster:~# Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ... kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP (...) Being a kernel oops, I would report it in Debian BTS. okay, will do. thanks -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source | | dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. | +-+---+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/35869.10.0.66.17.1332949773.squir...@interact.purplecow.org
Strange USB issue on 6.0.4 : kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP
I have a HP external USB attached disk plugged into a USB port on my system. Periodically, every eight or twelve hours or so, and without any real pattern or trigger cause, I see the following message : root@aster:~# Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ... kernel:[1202001.893158] Oops: 0010 [#5] SMP Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ... kernel:[1202001.893165] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/usb3/3-1/3-1.3/3-1.3:1.0/host8/target8:0:0/8:0:0:0/block/sdc/uevent Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ... kernel:[1202001.893435] Stack: Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ... kernel:[1202001.893469] Call Trace: Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ... kernel:[1202001.893735] Code: Bad RIP value. Message from syslogd@aster at Mar 26 15:23:02 ... kernel:[1202001.893754] CR2: 00fd0019 The external USB disk is no longer mounted and any attemp to read it ( with a simple ls ) results in IO errors. I unplug it. Wait 30 secs or so. Plug it back in and then I see in /dev/sd? thus : root@aster:~# ls -laptr /dev/sd* brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 16 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sdb brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sda brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 17 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sdb1 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 3 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sda3 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 2 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sda2 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sda1 brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 4 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sda4 brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 33 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sdc1 brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 32 Mar 12 17:29 /dev/sdc brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 96 Mar 27 21:53 /dev/sdg brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 97 Mar 27 21:53 /dev/sdg1 The last entry there /dev/sdg1 would be my external HP disk which I can now mount : root@aster:~# /bin/mount -v -t ext4 -o rw /dev/sdg1 /hp Now the filesystem is usable with no real issues. I have to repeat this process daily, once or twice, and the message on the console are generally the same. More or less. How would I go about debugging this issue if it is caused by the USB driver ? Thank you in advance for any insights. Dennis -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindexsearch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source | | dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. | +-+---+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/37271.10.0.66.17.1332885610.squir...@interact.purplecow.org
Re: aacraid and smp kernel: SCSI hang
did you have any issues with the video on the ibm 3650 ? I am having a wierd problem where i disabled the gdm3 from loading - now i can not get the text console on the server. You know the login screen in text mode on the server is not visiable - but can login to server from other workstations. I thought i sent you this email before...but do not knwo if you got it. thanks mjh On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Joey L mjh2...@gmail.com wrote: thanks a bunch! On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Kostas Magkos k...@iit.demokritos.gr wrote: If you are running squeeze you shouldn't be searching for the module. What you see on this webpage is the Adaptec Storage Manager (ASM) which is the software to manage the controller. The aacraid module (which is needed for the kernel to access the controller and thus the raid containers) should be included in the stock squeeze kernel. At least this is the case for our 2410sa. I believe both controllers (2820sa and 2410sa) are accessed through the same module, but I'm not sure. You should check. A good place for getting help and searching for solutions is the Adaptec Support Knowledgebase at: http://ask.adaptec.com As a matter of fact, I did use ASK quite recently (last summer) and while our controller is really old they, worked with me and helped me figure out what was messing up our setup. The support guy even gave me a link to download a version of ASM that wasn't in the download page of the 2410sa, compatible with debian. Regards, Kostas Joey L wrote: thanks for the quick reply back - do you know where i can get the latest module for debian squeeze x86 ? There are so many on the site and that i have found and do not know which is which.. http://www.adaptec.com/en-us/downloads/storage_manager/sm/productid=aar-2820sadn=adaptec+serial+ata+ii+raid+2820sa.html thanks On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Kostas Magkos k...@iit.demokritos.gr wrote: Hi there, I've scrolled back my notes and found that this was an issue with sarge and aacraid module prior to 1.1.5.-2400. This was solved as soon as we upgraded to etch (etch comes with aacraid 1.1.5-2409). As I can recall, the system had a rather arbitrary behaviour while running sarge: most of the times it would fail to boot, but sometimes it would reach the login prompt and then run steadily until the next reboot. For the record I can't remember getting any answers for this. Hope that helps a bit, Kostas Joey L wrote: hi..i am getting the same issue on ibm 3650 - did you get any answers or found solution ? thanks mj On Wed, Dec 5, 2007 at 5:09 AM, Kostas Magkos k...@iit.demokritos.gr wrote: Greetings all, Our main server is an Opteron system with an Adaptec SATA RAID 2410SA controller and 4x 250GB Seagate Barracuda disks attached to it, forming a RAID-5 and a RAID-0 container. The system is running sarge with the latest 2.6.8 kernel (2.6.8-13-amd64-k8). We recently upgraded the server with a second Opteron CPU. When we tried to boot the system with the SMP kernel it gave the following messages just after the login prompt and hung: Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI hang ? Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI hang ? Nov 9 09:53:32 myhost kernel: aacraid: SCSI bus appears hung Sarge 2.6.8 kernels contain aacraid 1.1.2-lk2. I managed to compile and install version 1.1.5-2400 (downloaded from Adaptec's site) but without any luck, the system still hangs. Please note that aacraid 1.1.5-2400 has been used in the single CPU system (i.e. before the addition of the second CPU) for quite some time, without any problems. Has anyone else faced a similar situation? A google search revealed this is an old bug, dated back to 2003 but with no clear solution whatsoever. Any help would be much appreciated. In the time being I have two options, either remove the second cpu or remove the raid controller, both of which suck :-). Some technical details --- Motherboard: Tyan Thunder K8WE CPU: 2x AMD Opteron 246 RAM: 2x 1GB Kingston DDR PC3200 ECC RAID Controller: Adaptec 2410SA HDD: 4x 250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 SATA user@myhost:~$ uname -ra Linux myhost -smp #1 Sat Jun 9 16:52:03 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- Konstantinos Magkos, MSc Information Systems Engineer ... Networks Laboratory, Institute of Informatics Telecommunications, National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos ... 153 10 Agia Paraskevi, Athens, Greece tel: +30 21 06503125 fax: +30 21 06543606 nic-hdl: KM1706-RIPE http://www.ariadne-t.gr http://www.iit.demokritos.gr -- Konstantinos Magkos, MSc Information Systems
INSTALL DEBIAN 6.0 WITH KERNEL SMP
Hi, I would like to know if I can choose a smp kernel when I going to install DEBIAN 6.0 Regards. Alex PADOLY
Re: INSTALL DEBIAN 6.0 WITH KERNEL SMP
2011-04-19 15:29, alex.padoly skrev: I would like to know if I can choose a smp kernel when I going to install DEBIAN 6.0 I believe there is no choice. All kernels are smp-kernels. A related bug report was closed in 2007 with the comment: As recent Linux kernels in Debian all have SMP support built-in, I am closing this bug report, as there is no need to install a specific kernel version for system with more than one processor. / johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iok3rd$8o8$1...@dough.gmane.org
Re: Intel Atom N450 Kernel Config Options re: SMP
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote: Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/29/2010 12:01 PM: Things are running nicely, but the problem I hoped to resolve hasn't been. Namely, the lowest frequency my cpu can reach is 1Ghz... instead of the 800Mhz that it reaches on windows and in the spec sheets. Advice on how to proceed from here is greatly appreciated. I led you to the well but it's up to you to drink Arthur. You didn't read the help screens. All the frequency info you need is there. It is the key to you succeeding at this. You may have to experiment some, but that's a requirement when rolling one's own kernels. Welcome to the club. It's rarely easy. ;) Asking on here isn't my first attempt at figuring things out. My kernel config work is based on Greg KM's book The Linux Kernel In A Nutshell. So, not only have I read the help screens, but I've also read a pretty decent book by one of the kernel's prime maintainers. I should have been more clear about the advice I was hoping for, since there is nothing wrong with my kernel config, I was looking for advice about how to go about further debugging this issue of not having full frequency range. I wanted to give fixing it a solid try before filing a bug against the kernel itself. BTW, I'm curious as to your motivations for this. Is this basically a Windows can do 800MHz, so $deity dammit, Linux should be able to do it as well! thing? Not as such. More like a my processor is supposed to scale from 800Mhz to 1.6Ghz, and its strange that it doesn't. I wonder why. In practical terms Arthur, you will not notice a meaningful difference in thermal output or current draw (battery consumption) between 800MHz and 1GHz with the n450. The n450 has a TDP of 5.5 watts at 1.66GHz. Thus you won't even save 1 watt going from 1GHz to 800MHz in power save mode. It'll be something like 300 milliwatts or less. This exercise of yours is futile if your goal is a _practical_ difference in system operation. I suppose that will have to count as advice on how to proceed, but I hope you'll forgive me if I continue to search for an answer. Your comments are reassuring to me though, that it isn't a serious problem, and I do thank you for that. At this point, I'm thinking it's a problem with the kernel or a problem with my bios, and I think there are some kernel command line parameters I can use to test the latter in Greg's book. Best wishes, AM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik4hxnhdffabujjjnpiaksp-b0emrvl3p157...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Intel Atom N450 Kernel Config Options re: SMP
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Christian Jaeger chr...@gmail.com wrote: How do you read the possible cpu frequencies? Your kernel needs cpufreq support and ondemand, powersave, etc. governors; check with cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor Although with some hardware AFAIK other drivers than cpufreq are used, I don't know for Atom. Hi Chris, Available frequencies are taken from /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/freq/available_scaling_frequencies, in addition powertop shows the same information. Governors are all compiled into the kernel, and switching between them by echoing conservative or ondemand to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/freq/current_scaling_governor works. I haven't tried user space yet, because I don't have any userspace tools installed right now to change cpufreq. I'll remedy that this weekend and see if it makes any difference. Currently I'm using the acpi_cpufreq built into the kernel, however a few other intel related ones like p4 and even those marked as deprecated are built as modules. Appreciate the input, AM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinwxfwgrmvp+bghixqf8owqgprhrs3d3xt=b...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Intel Atom N450 Kernel Config Options re: SMP
Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/30/2010 9:04 AM: BTW, I'm curious as to your motivations for this. Is this basically a Windows can do 800MHz, so $deity dammit, Linux should be able to do it as well! thing? Not as such. More like a my processor is supposed to scale from 800Mhz to 1.6Ghz, and its strange that it doesn't. I wonder why. That's what I figured. I had a similar mindset when I was a younger man. Let me share a relevant story: Back in 1997 I bought a beautiful used Midnight Blue 1993 Ford Probe GT with the hopped up 24 valve quad cam V6 and a 5 speed manual transmission. It was Motor Trend Magazine's 1993 Car Of The Year. The tested top speed was 137 miles per hour. I was dead set on achieving that published top speed. I didn't have a racetrack available for my testing. Over the course of about 3 weeks I would find open stretches of Interstate 370 with little to no traffic. On 5 occasions I was able to hit 135 mph, but no more. I was determined to hit the magical 137 that Motor Trend said it would do. On the six occasion on a cool afternoon I had just hit 136 mph when I rocketed past a hidden Missouri Highway Patrolman manning a radar gun. As soon as I saw the cherries in my rear view mirror I slowed down and pulled over. Evading wasn't an option even with that kind of speed and lead: you can't outrun a radio or a helicopter. ;) Due to traveling at almost double the posted speed limit I spent a mandatory night in jail. The attorney cost me $450 and the ticket for doing 76 mph _over_ the posted speed limit was $548, for a grand total of $998. The attorney got the reckless driving charge dropped and massaged the speeding charge so I only took a 2 point hit on my license instead of 5. A reckless driving conviction along with the additional points would have put me into what the insurance industry calls the high risk category, which would have quadrupled my insurance premiums. That would have driven my monthly insurance payment to just under $500/month, which was more than my split of rent at the time. The moral of the story: Even if they say it will do it, and others have achieved it, it's not always wise, nor cost effective, to maniacally chase the numbers. :) I suppose that will have to count as advice on how to proceed, but I hope you'll forgive me if I continue to search for an answer. Your comments are reassuring to me though, that it isn't a serious problem, and I do thank you for that. There's nothing to forgive. It's your time and effort going into this. I'm simply trying to save you large amounts of both as I've been there and done that. At this point, I'm thinking it's a problem with the kernel or a problem with my bios, and I think there are some kernel command line parameters I can use to test the latter in Greg's book. And before filing a kernel bug, it would be very wise to ask the questions you have here on lkml before you submit a bug. Debian-users isn't really the proper venue for discussing your problem. This is a user list, not a developer list. There are very few, if any, kernel hackers on this list with the knowledge/answers you are seeking. And no I'm not one of them. Having more than cursory experience rolling my own kernels is a far cry from being a kernel hacker. I'm not a C programmer. My advice: expend your energy on aspects of Debian/Linux that will yield practical, tangible benefits. This isn't one of them. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c52fd83.3080...@hardwarefreak.com
Re: Intel Atom N450 Kernel Config Options re: SMP
Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/28/2010 11:14 PM: Greetings, According to the spec sheet on the Atom N450 it has a single core, though it does support two threads. However, linuxinfo (replaces cpuinfo I suppose) says two unknown processors. Your kernel doesn't either doesn't support CPU_ID or doesn't have the tables for Atom CPUs, or both. This is a kernel config option. r...@hpm210:/home/arthur/Misc/Linux/2.6.34-1# linuxinfo Linux HPm210 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59:47 UTC 2010 Two Intel Unknown 1666MHz processors, 6650.42 total bogomips, 1011M RAM Strangely, that's not the correct amount of ram in the system. Strangely, most people don't rely on linuxinfo. ;) File a bug report. r...@hpm210:/home/arthur/Misc/Linux/2.6.34-1# free -m total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 2014 1377636 0 6 1186 -/+ buffers/cache:184 1830 Swap: 1972 0 1971 Anyway, as you can see from the current directory, the reason I'm asking about the number of cpu's cores in the atom n450 is that I'm rolling my own kernel hoping a newer version will be able to get the freq down to 800mhz same as windows, currently reporting that it can only go as low as 1000. Also want to optimize for the atom processor and build in all modules needed for hardware. In make menuconfig: In Processor Type and Features uncheck Symmetric multi-processing support check Intel Atom in Processor Family check SMT (HyperThreading) uncheck Multi-core scheduler support check Intel MCE features check /dev/cpu/*/msr - Model-specific register support check /dev/cpu/*/cpuid - CPU information support These last two are probably the reason for the unknown, especially given you're running 2.6.34 which has all the CPU models currently on the market. In Power management and ACPI options select CPU Frequency scaling check CPU Frequency scaling (not a dup typo) read the descriptions and decide which is the best default governor for you then select the CPUFreq processor drivers that matches your hardware platform You'll have to figure out all the other menu config settings on your own, as most of us kernel monkeys have. ;) These are simply the ones that directly relate to your questions. Hope this helped get you closer. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c515c0c.8010...@hardwarefreak.com
Re: Intel Atom N450 Kernel Config Options re: SMP
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote: Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/28/2010 11:14 PM: In make menuconfig: snip These last two are probably the reason for the unknown, especially given you're running 2.6.34 which has all the CPU models currently on the market. Probably just a problem with linuxinfo, which I'd never heard of before, but installed when cpuinfo was not found and aptitude suggested linuxinfo provided it. In any event, cat /proc/cpuinfo shows all the right information. You can't.. or rather, I can't select SMT support without first checking SMP support. In Power management and ACPI options snip You'll have to figure out all the other menu config settings on your own, as most of us kernel monkeys have. ;) These are simply the ones that directly relate to your questions. Hope this helped get you closer. Somewhat. All those were pretty much done already. Greg KM's Kernel In A Nutshell book is quite comprehensive and let me build an initrd-less kernel in one try. Things are running nicely, but the problem I hoped to resolve hasn't been. Namely, the lowest frequency my cpu can reach is 1Ghz... instead of the 800Mhz that it reaches on windows and in the spec sheets. Advice on how to proceed from here is greatly appreciated. Best, AM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikyvdn-by2wlo6pddyhzaosiucgkzagkqjg0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Intel Atom N450 Kernel Config Options re: SMP
How do you read the possible cpu frequencies? Your kernel needs cpufreq support and ondemand, powersave, etc. governors; check with cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor Although with some hardware AFAIK other drivers than cpufreq are used, I don't know for Atom. Ch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktingqoonklvch+msw3xi6aehugm2geetvtaqb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Intel Atom N450 Kernel Config Options re: SMP
Arthur Machlas put forth on 7/29/2010 12:01 PM: Things are running nicely, but the problem I hoped to resolve hasn't been. Namely, the lowest frequency my cpu can reach is 1Ghz... instead of the 800Mhz that it reaches on windows and in the spec sheets. Advice on how to proceed from here is greatly appreciated. I led you to the well but it's up to you to drink Arthur. You didn't read the help screens. All the frequency info you need is there. It is the key to you succeeding at this. You may have to experiment some, but that's a requirement when rolling one's own kernels. Welcome to the club. It's rarely easy. ;) BTW, I'm curious as to your motivations for this. Is this basically a Windows can do 800MHz, so $deity dammit, Linux should be able to do it as well! thing? In practical terms Arthur, you will not notice a meaningful difference in thermal output or current draw (battery consumption) between 800MHz and 1GHz with the n450. The n450 has a TDP of 5.5 watts at 1.66GHz. Thus you won't even save 1 watt going from 1GHz to 800MHz in power save mode. It'll be something like 300 milliwatts or less. This exercise of yours is futile if your goal is a _practical_ difference in system operation. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c5268ba.40...@hardwarefreak.com
Intel Atom N450 Kernel Config Options re: SMP
Greetings, According to the spec sheet on the Atom N450 it has a single core, though it does support two threads. However, linuxinfo (replaces cpuinfo I suppose) says two unknown processors. r...@hpm210:/home/arthur/Misc/Linux/2.6.34-1# linuxinfo Linux HPm210 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59:47 UTC 2010 Two Intel Unknown 1666MHz processors, 6650.42 total bogomips, 1011M RAM Strangely, that's not the correct amount of ram in the system. r...@hpm210:/home/arthur/Misc/Linux/2.6.34-1# free -m total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 2014 1377636 0 6 1186 -/+ buffers/cache:184 1830 Swap: 1972 0 1971 Anyway, as you can see from the current directory, the reason I'm asking about the number of cpu's cores in the atom n450 is that I'm rolling my own kernel hoping a newer version will be able to get the freq down to 800mhz same as windows, currently reporting that it can only go as low as 1000. Also want to optimize for the atom processor and build in all modules needed for hardware. The Linux Kernel in a Nutshell book has got me pretty far, but I can't solve this cpu thing and hoping someone can weigh in with some friendly advice. The help in kernel config says things will run better if I don't enable smp on a single cpu system. Hence, the question to you, lazyweb, with much appreciation in advance. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik2fgupzc7tm+o30hy2mcfo8vd7cixkp+blg...@mail.gmail.com
problem with kernel 2.6.26-smp
Hello there, I am using the kernel in my subject. It seems as though this kernel likes to lock up quite a bit when the CPu fan is at a higher rate of speed due to other tasks being done in the background. I am using Lenny and I never can remember before Debian being this unstable. Is there a kernel in Lenny or a newer kernel I could try to see if things become more stable? It seems to happen mostly when I use Gnome and Gnome crashes as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: problem with kernel 2.6.26-smp
Scott Berry: I am using the kernel in my subject. It seems as though this kernel likes to lock up quite a bit when the CPu fan is at a higher rate of speed due to other tasks being done in the background. I am using Lenny and I never can remember before Debian being this unstable. Sounds more like a thermal problem to me. Do you have lm-sensors installed? What CPU model do you use? What's its temperature? How old is the thermal paste between the CPU and the heat sink? Is there a kernel in Lenny or a newer kernel I could try to see if things become more stable? It seems to happen mostly when I use Gnome and Gnome crashes as well. What exactly crashes? Just Gnome or the whole machine? I suspect you are mixing up two unrelated symptoms (but that's just a guess, of course). J. -- We are lining up to see you fall flat on your face. [Agree] [Disagree] http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Fwd: [OFF] Configurar SMP
Olá, Estes dias reparei que o meu kernel apenas detecta um core do processador, já revi a configuração do kernel e compilei várias vezes, as configurações parecem-me correctas. O processador é um AMD X2 3800, tenho esta configuração # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y CONFIG_NO_HZ=y CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BUILD=y CONFIG_SMP=y # CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ is not set CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE=y # CONFIG_X86_EXTENDED_PLATFORM is not set # CONFIG_SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER is not set CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST=y # CONFIG_XEN is not set CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK=y CONFIG_KVM_GUEST=y CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y # CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS is not set CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK=y # CONFIG_PARAVIRT_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_MEMTEST=y # CONFIG_M386 is not set # CONFIG_M486 is not set # CONFIG_M586 is not set # CONFIG_M586TSC is not set # CONFIG_M586MMX is not set # CONFIG_M686 is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set # CONFIG_MK6 is not set # CONFIG_MK7 is not set CONFIG_MK8=y # CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set # CONFIG_MEFFICEON is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set # CONFIG_MGEODEGX1 is not set # CONFIG_MGEODE_LX is not set # CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC7 is not set # CONFIG_MPSC is not set # CONFIG_MCORE2 is not set # CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU is not set CONFIG_X86_CPU=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES=64 CONFIG_X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES=64 CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=6 CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y CONFIG_X86_TSC=y CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64=y CONFIG_X86_CMOV=y CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY=64 CONFIG_X86_DEBUGCTLMSR=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_CENTAUR=y # CONFIG_X86_DS is not set CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y CONFIG_DMI=y CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y CONFIG_CALGARY_IOMMU=y CONFIG_CALGARY_IOMMU_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU=y # CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_STATS is not set CONFIG_SWIOTLB=y CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y # CONFIG_MAXSMP is not set CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2 # CONFIG_SCHED_SMT is not set CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y # CONFIG_X86_REROUTE_FOR_BROKEN_BOOT_IRQS is not set CONFIG_X86_MCE=y # CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL is not set CONFIG_X86_MCE_AMD=y CONFIG_X86_MCE_THRESHOLD=y # CONFIG_I8K is not set CONFIG_MICROCODE=m # CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL is not set CONFIG_MICROCODE_AMD=y CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE=y CONFIG_X86_MSR=m CONFIG_X86_CPUID=m # CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y CONFIG_DIRECT_GBPAGES=y CONFIG_NUMA=y CONFIG_K8_NUMA=y CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA=y CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES=y # CONFIG_NUMA_EMU is not set CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=6 CONFIG_ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE=y CONFIG_ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y # CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL is not set # CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES=y CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORY_PRESENT=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y Tenho uma duvida há muito tempo, se tenho um AMD, porquê me obriga a configurar os 3 ? CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_CENTAUR=y Abraço Silvino Oi, Parece que é um problema do kernel 2.6.30.1, pois o 2.6.26 funciona a primeira ;) Abraço Silvino -- debiminho.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[OFF] Configurar SMP
Olá, Estes dias reparei que o meu kernel apenas detecta um core do processador, já revi a configuração do kernel e compilei várias vezes, as configurações parecem-me correctas. O processador é um AMD X2 3800, tenho esta configuração # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y CONFIG_NO_HZ=y CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BUILD=y CONFIG_SMP=y # CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ is not set CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE=y # CONFIG_X86_EXTENDED_PLATFORM is not set # CONFIG_SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER is not set CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST=y # CONFIG_XEN is not set CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK=y CONFIG_KVM_GUEST=y CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y # CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS is not set CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK=y # CONFIG_PARAVIRT_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_MEMTEST=y # CONFIG_M386 is not set # CONFIG_M486 is not set # CONFIG_M586 is not set # CONFIG_M586TSC is not set # CONFIG_M586MMX is not set # CONFIG_M686 is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set # CONFIG_MK6 is not set # CONFIG_MK7 is not set CONFIG_MK8=y # CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set # CONFIG_MEFFICEON is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set # CONFIG_MGEODEGX1 is not set # CONFIG_MGEODE_LX is not set # CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC7 is not set # CONFIG_MPSC is not set # CONFIG_MCORE2 is not set # CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU is not set CONFIG_X86_CPU=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_BYTES=64 CONFIG_X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_BYTES=64 CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=6 CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y CONFIG_X86_TSC=y CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64=y CONFIG_X86_CMOV=y CONFIG_X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY=64 CONFIG_X86_DEBUGCTLMSR=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_CENTAUR=y # CONFIG_X86_DS is not set CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y CONFIG_DMI=y CONFIG_GART_IOMMU=y CONFIG_CALGARY_IOMMU=y CONFIG_CALGARY_IOMMU_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU=y # CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_STATS is not set CONFIG_SWIOTLB=y CONFIG_IOMMU_HELPER=y CONFIG_IOMMU_API=y # CONFIG_MAXSMP is not set CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2 # CONFIG_SCHED_SMT is not set CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y # CONFIG_X86_REROUTE_FOR_BROKEN_BOOT_IRQS is not set CONFIG_X86_MCE=y # CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL is not set CONFIG_X86_MCE_AMD=y CONFIG_X86_MCE_THRESHOLD=y # CONFIG_I8K is not set CONFIG_MICROCODE=m # CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL is not set CONFIG_MICROCODE_AMD=y CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE=y CONFIG_X86_MSR=m CONFIG_X86_CPUID=m # CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG is not set CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y CONFIG_DIRECT_GBPAGES=y CONFIG_NUMA=y CONFIG_K8_NUMA=y CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA=y CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES=y # CONFIG_NUMA_EMU is not set CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=6 CONFIG_ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE=y CONFIG_ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y CONFIG_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL=y # CONFIG_FLATMEM_MANUAL is not set # CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL is not set CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES=y CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORY_PRESENT=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE=y CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y Tenho uma duvida há muito tempo, se tenho um AMD, porquê me obriga a configurar os 3 ? CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD=y CONFIG_CPU_SUP_CENTAUR=y Abraço Silvino -- debiminho.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
SMP apm
Just been chaseing up some post install loose ends, one of which was getting the 'automatic power off on halt' to work... The steps required turned out to be: a. apt-get install apm b. echo apm /etc/modules c. echo 'options apm power_off=1' /etc/modprobe.d/apm which seems to have done the trick nicely. However I am a little concerned about the messages produced when apm is loaded: apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1.16ac) apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe (power off active). This is a SMP motherboard with two cpu's installed: Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.1 Virtual Wire compatibility mode. OEM ID: INTELProduct ID: 440GXAPIC at: 0xFEE0 Processor #0 6:8 APIC version 17 Processor #1 6:8 APIC version 17 I/O APIC #2 Version 17 at 0xFEC0. Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs Processors: 2 So is the message about apm being disabled lying - it is doing something as it is enabling my auto power off, and /proc/apm appears showing: penemunde:/etc# cat /proc/apm 1.16ac 1.2 0x03 0xff 0xff 0xff -1% -1 ? I have skimmed through the apm source, at it looks to me like it is just that the message is a listtle misleading and that the power off part of apm is safe with SMP, and the unsafe bits are disabled. I think this is right, but thought it worth mentioning as it seems like something that should be in an Etch FAQ.. Regards, DigbyT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aacraid and smp kernel: SCSI hang
Greetings all, Our main server is an Opteron system with an Adaptec SATA RAID 2410SA controller and 4x 250GB Seagate Barracuda disks attached to it, forming a RAID-5 and a RAID-0 container. The system is running sarge with the latest 2.6.8 kernel (2.6.8-13-amd64-k8). We recently upgraded the server with a second Opteron CPU. When we tried to boot the system with the SMP kernel it gave the following messages just after the login prompt and hung: Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI hang ? Nov 9 09:52:58 myhost kernel: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI hang ? Nov 9 09:53:32 myhost kernel: aacraid: SCSI bus appears hung Sarge 2.6.8 kernels contain aacraid 1.1.2-lk2. I managed to compile and install version 1.1.5-2400 (downloaded from Adaptec's site) but without any luck, the system still hangs. Please note that aacraid 1.1.5-2400 has been used in the single CPU system (i.e. before the addition of the second CPU) for quite some time, without any problems. Has anyone else faced a similar situation? A google search revealed this is an old bug, dated back to 2003 but with no clear solution whatsoever. Any help would be much appreciated. In the time being I have two options, either remove the second cpu or remove the raid controller, both of which suck :-). Some technical details --- Motherboard: Tyan Thunder K8WE CPU: 2x AMD Opteron 246 RAM: 2x 1GB Kingston DDR PC3200 ECC RAID Controller: Adaptec 2410SA HDD: 4x 250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 SATA [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -ra Linux myhost -smp #1 Sat Jun 9 16:52:03 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Etch 2.6.18-5-486 stable but 2.6.18-5-686 crashes on PIII SMP???
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 01:04:12PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote: I am hoping that there might be some kernel experts out there that can offer some suggestions as to what might be going wrong with the 686 kernel, and which I might be able to try in order to resolve (or at least explain) the problem... If you don't get any meaningful answers here maybe you could try the debian-kernel list, but please post back if you solve it, I'm very curious of the outcome. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Etch 2.6.18-5-486 stable but 2.6.18-5-686 crashes on PIII SMP???
I have installed Etch using a recent netinstall on a Dell Precision 410, and had a lot of trouble initially with mysterious frequent 'segmentation fault' errors and total system freezes which required a reset. After some trial and error and some advice from the net I discovered that if I installed the 2.6.18-5-486 kernel and booted that instead of the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from the installer then all the instability went away. However this leaves me without use of my second CPU and without access to a 'bigmem' kernel to access all of my ram :( I am hoping that there might be some kernel experts out there that can offer some suggestions as to what might be going wrong with the 686 kernel, and which I might be able to try in order to resolve (or at least explain) the problem... /proc/cpuinfo returns: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 7 model name : Pentium III (Katmai) stepping: 2 cpu MHz : 447.728 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse bogomips: 896.10 I tried booting the 686 kernel with the 'nosmp' option to see if there was a problem with the SMP implementation on this machine, but that made no difference (other than giving me a single processor). Anyone come across anything like this? Any kernel experts with any idea what difference between these two kernels might explain this problem? A 'diff config-2.6.18-5-486 config-2.6.18-5-686' produces 4c4 # Tue Oct 2 23:31:31 2007 --- # Tue Oct 2 23:31:49 2007 24c24 CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y --- CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y 40a41 CONFIG_CPUSETS=y 72a74 CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE=y 97c99 # CONFIG_SMP is not set --- CONFIG_SMP=y 108c110 CONFIG_M486=y --- # CONFIG_M486 is not set 112c114 # CONFIG_M686 is not set --- CONFIG_M686=y 129c131 CONFIG_X86_GENERIC=y --- # CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is not set 132c134 CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=7 --- CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=5 136d137 CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG=y 141,142c142,145 CONFIG_X86_ALIGNMENT_16=y CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y --- CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64=y CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y CONFIG_X86_TSC=y 143a147,149 CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8 CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y 147,148c153 CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC=y --- # CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL is not set 151c156,158 # CONFIG_X86_MCE is not set --- CONFIG_X86_MCE=y CONFIG_X86_MCE_NONFATAL=m CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL=y 167,168c174,175 CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y # CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set --- # CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y 170a178 CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y 183c191,192 CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION=y --- # CONFIG_HIGHPTE is not set # CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set 185a195 CONFIG_IRQBALANCE=y 193a204 # CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is not set 194a206 CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y 195a208 CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y 204a218 CONFIG_SUSPEND_SMP=y 220a235 CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU=y 253c268 CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS=y --- # CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS is not set 306,313c321,322 CONFIG_EISA=y CONFIG_EISA_VLB_PRIMING=y CONFIG_EISA_PCI_EISA=y CONFIG_EISA_VIRTUAL_ROOT=y CONFIG_EISA_NAMES=y CONFIG_MCA=y CONFIG_MCA_LEGACY=y # CONFIG_MCA_PROC_FS is not set --- # CONFIG_EISA is not set # CONFIG_MCA is not set 350c359 CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ_NVRAM=y --- # CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ_NVRAM is not set 762d770 CONFIG_DMASCC=m 815d822 CONFIG_IRPORT_SIR=m 820d826 # CONFIG_DONGLE_OLD is not set 1210d1215 CONFIG_SCSI_AHA1740=m 1215d1219 CONFIG_AIC7XXX_PROBE_EISA_VL=y 1262d1265 CONFIG_SCSI_FD_MCS=m 1267,1269d1269 CONFIG_SCSI_IBMMCA=m CONFIG_IBMMCA_SCSI_ORDER_STANDARD=y # CONFIG_IBMMCA_SCSI_DEV_RESET is not set 1278d1277 CONFIG_SCSI_NCR_D700=m 1287,1292d1285 CONFIG_SCSI_NCR_Q720=m CONFIG_SCSI_NCR53C8XX_DEFAULT_TAGS=8
Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 15:21 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:30:57PM +0200, Robert Cates wrote: michael wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote: Hi all, just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16 CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support? don't expect things to go 16x faster Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're talking about a 2GHz quad core CPU we're not getting 8GHz of speed, but what exactly is the (performance) advantage of SMP? how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of tasks running independently of each other and/or you have tasks running code that can take advantage of parallel processing, then those things that fit that criterion will run in parallel. And those tasks will then complete faster because they have more cpu time than they would get in a system with fewer cpus. At least that's how it seems to me. current multicore also shares (L2?) cache so there's contention there too which will severely affect codes that require data to work on... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of ^^ No!, it is yet another Americanism. :-) tasks running independently of each other and/or you have tasks running code that can take advantage of parallel processing, then those things that fit that criterion will run in parallel. And those tasks will then complete faster because they have more cpu time than they would get in a system with fewer cpus. At least that's how it seems to me. -- Chris. == -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:17:21PM -0400, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:58PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of ^^ No!, it is yet another Americanism. :-) but it works so well! besides, I grew up saying a-whole-nother, so there's no hope for me... A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
El vie, 12-10-2007 a las 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates escribió: Hi all, just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16 CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /boot/config-2.6.18-5-686 | grep CONFIG_NR_CPUS CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8 This was the vanilla config also. If you want more CPUs, you will need to compile. greetings P.D. be careful with top, if you press '1', on a 25 lines term, with 16 cpus, you only will see the headers, and not process information :-) P.D.2 on top, if you press 'f', then 'j', then 'enter' you will see a new column titled 'P', where you will see the CPU that is using each process. Press 'W' to make it permanent. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
michael wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote: Hi all, just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16 CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support? Thanks much, Robert don't expect things to go 16x faster Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're talking about a 2GHz quad core CPU we're not getting 8GHz of speed, but what exactly is the (performance) advantage of SMP? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:30:57PM +0200, Robert Cates wrote: michael wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote: Hi all, just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16 CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support? don't expect things to go 16x faster Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're talking about a 2GHz quad core CPU we're not getting 8GHz of speed, but what exactly is the (performance) advantage of SMP? how about 16x more parallel? at least to the extent that your workload is able to parallelize (is that a word?). IOW, if you have lots of tasks running independently of each other and/or you have tasks running code that can take advantage of parallel processing, then those things that fit that criterion will run in parallel. And those tasks will then complete faster because they have more cpu time than they would get in a system with fewer cpus. At least that's how it seems to me. A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Robert Cates wrote: Ok, but 16x better? Or 16x more efficient? I know that if we're talking about a 2GHz quad core CPU we're not getting 8GHz of speed, but what exactly is the (performance) advantage of SMP? Not much, unless you can write software that can take advantage of the additional processors.. HTH -ishwar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
Hi all, just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16 CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support? Thanks much, Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel 2.6.18+ SMP question
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote: Hi all, just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16 CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the SMP kernel work with all 16 cores? What is actually the current limit of cores (CPUs) that the 2.6.18 (or newer) kernel will support? Thanks much, Robert don't expect things to go 16x faster -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Processador prescot e kernel SMP
Brivaldo, Isso eu tenho. 1GB de ram. Vou deixar este kernel ento. obrigado -- Alexandre Pereira Bhler Linux User 397546 Telefone: (41) 3039-5428 http://www.infobrindes.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] E o tamanho da sua memria?? se tiver 1Gb vale a pena.. se for inferir a isso.. na realidade a diferena de ter ou no ter to pequena que no vale o trabalho. No seu caso claro. [ ]s Brivaldo Jr Em 23/09/07, Alexandre Pereira Bhler[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Brivaldo, Ai que est... meu processador no tem HT ou duplo ncleo. Ento no tem vantagem nenhuma? Obrigado -- Alexandre Pereira Bhler Linux User 397546 Telefone: (41) 3039-5428 http://www.infobrindes.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Processador prescot e kernel SMP
Em 24/09/07, Alexandre Pereira Bühler[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Isso eu tenho. 1GB de ram. Vou deixar este kernel então. Interessante, veja lá no e-mail que você mandou que, segundo o cat /proc/cpuinfo, o seu processador tem HT (tá lá no meio das flags) mas segundo o everest, não tem, diz Hyper-Threading Technology (HTT): Não suportado. Por que isso? É apenas uma curiosidade... Rodolfo. -- Rodolfo Sebastião Estupiñán Allan Departamento de Matemática Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais/Rondonópolis Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso
Re: Processador prescot e kernel SMP
Rodolfo, É verdade! mas na Bios diz que não há HT e tenho ela atualizada. Minha placa quando o processador tem ht coloca a opção de habilitar/desabilitar. O engraçado é que meu processador é o mais pobre da versão prescot. Na família prescot os mais ricos têm suporte a ht. pelo menos do que li no site da intel. Mas meu inglês é péssimo mesmo. vou pesquisar mais. Sua observação foi boa. Obrigado -- Alexandre Pereira Bühler Linux User 397546 Telefone: (41) 3039-5428 http://www.infobrindes.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Processador prescot e kernel SMP
Hehhee.. é isso ae. Manda bala. [ ]'s Brivaldo Jr (condector) Em 24/09/07, Alexandre Pereira Bühler[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Rodolfo, É verdade! mas na Bios diz que não há HT e tenho ela atualizada. Minha placa quando o processador tem ht coloca a opção de habilitar/desabilitar. O engraçado é que meu processador é o mais pobre da versão prescot. Na família prescot os mais ricos têm suporte a ht. pelo menos do que li no site da intel. Mas meu inglês é péssimo mesmo. vou pesquisar mais. Sua observação foi boa. Obrigado -- Alexandre Pereira Bühler Linux User 397546 Telefone: (41) 3039-5428 http://www.infobrindes.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Debian Linux em MS, eu apoio esta idéia e você? -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- DEBIAN-MS
Processador prescot e kernel SMP
Tenho um Intel Pentium 4, 2800 MHz, Prescott, G1, com conujnto de intruções x86, x86-64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3. Segue abaixo uma tabela completa. A pergunta é porque o Debian sempre instala por padrão um Kernel SMP para esse processador? É por causa do CMP? A vantangem em deixar este kernel instalado? Obrigado cat cpuinfo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc$ cat cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz stepping: 9 cpu MHz : 2793.302 cache size : 1024 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc up pni monitor ds_cpl tm2 cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 5590.49 Everest: (CPUID) Propriedades: (CPUID) FabricanteGenuineIntel (CPUID) Nome da CPU Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (CPUID) Revisão 0F49h (IA) Identificador da marca 00h (Desconhecido) Identificador da plataforma FFh (Desconhecido) (IA) Número de série da CPU Desconhecido Unidades HTT / CMP0 / 1 Conjunto de instruções: Extensão x86 de 64 bites (AMD64, Intel64) Suportado AMD 3DNow!Não suportado AMD 3DNow! Professional Não suportado AMD 3DNowPrefetch Não suportado AMD Enhanced 3DNow! Não suportado AMD Extended MMX Não suportado AMD MisAligned SSENão suportado AMD SSE4A Não suportado Cyrix Extended MMXNão suportado IA-64 Não suportado IA MMXSuportado IA SSESuportado IA SSE 2 Suportado IA SSE 3 Suportado IA Supplemental SSE 3 Não suportado IA SSE 4 Não suportado VIA Alternate Instruction Set Não suportado Instrução CLFLUSH Suportado Instrução CMPXCHG8B Suportado Instrução CMPXCHG16B Suportado Instrução Conditional MoveSuportado Instrução MONITOR / MWAIT Suportado Instrução POPCNT / LZCNT Não suportado Instrução RDTSCP Não suportado Instrução SYSCALL / SYSRETNão suportado Instrução SYSENTER / SYSEXIT Suportado Instrução VIA FEMMS Não suportado Características de Segurança: Advanced Cryptography Engine (ACE)Não suportado Prevenção de Execução de Dados (DEP, NX, EDB) Não suportado Hardware Random Number Generator (RNG)Não suportado Montgomery Multiplier Hash Engine Não suportado Processor Serial Number (PSN) Não suportado Características de Gerenciamento de Energia: Automatic Clock Control Suportado Digital Thermometer Não suportado Enhanced Halt State (C1E) Não suportado Enhanced SpeedStep Technology (EIST, ESS) Não suportado Frequency ID Control Não suportado Hardware P-State Control Não suportado LongRun Não suportado LongRun Table Interface Não suportado PowerSaver 1.0Não suportado PowerSaver 2.0Não suportado PowerSaver 3.0Não suportado Processor Duty Cycle Control Suportado Software Thermal Control Não suportado Temperature Sensing Diode Não suportado Thermal Monitor 1 Suportado Thermal Monitor 2 Suportado Thermal MonitoringNão suportado Thermal Trip
Re: Processador prescot e kernel SMP
Se o seu processador tem HT ou é duplo núcleo é muita vantagem usar o SMP. 2007/9/23, Alexandre Pereira Bühler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tenho um Intel Pentium 4, 2800 MHz, Prescott, G1, com conujnto de intruções x86, x86-64, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3. Segue abaixo uma tabela completa. A pergunta é porque o Debian sempre instala por padrão um Kernel SMP para esse processador? É por causa do CMP? A vantangem em deixar este kernel instalado? Obrigado cat cpuinfo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/proc$ cat cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz stepping: 9 cpu MHz : 2793.302 cache size : 1024 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm constant_tsc up pni monitor ds_cpl tm2 cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 5590.49 Everest: (CPUID) Propriedades: (CPUID) FabricanteGenuineIntel (CPUID) Nome da CPU Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (CPUID) Revisão 0F49h (IA) Identificador da marca 00h (Desconhecido) Identificador da plataforma FFh (Desconhecido) (IA) Número de série da CPU Desconhecido Unidades HTT / CMP0 / 1 Conjunto de instruções: Extensão x86 de 64 bites (AMD64, Intel64) Suportado AMD 3DNow!Não suportado AMD 3DNow! Professional Não suportado AMD 3DNowPrefetch Não suportado AMD Enhanced 3DNow! Não suportado AMD Extended MMX Não suportado AMD MisAligned SSENão suportado AMD SSE4A Não suportado Cyrix Extended MMXNão suportado IA-64 Não suportado IA MMXSuportado IA SSESuportado IA SSE 2 Suportado IA SSE 3 Suportado IA Supplemental SSE 3 Não suportado IA SSE 4 Não suportado VIA Alternate Instruction Set Não suportado Instrução CLFLUSH Suportado Instrução CMPXCHG8B Suportado Instrução CMPXCHG16B Suportado Instrução Conditional MoveSuportado Instrução MONITOR / MWAIT Suportado Instrução POPCNT / LZCNT Não suportado Instrução RDTSCP Não suportado Instrução SYSCALL / SYSRETNão suportado Instrução SYSENTER / SYSEXIT Suportado Instrução VIA FEMMS Não suportado Características de Segurança: Advanced Cryptography Engine (ACE)Não suportado Prevenção de Execução de Dados (DEP, NX, EDB) Não suportado Hardware Random Number Generator (RNG)Não suportado Montgomery Multiplier Hash Engine Não suportado Processor Serial Number (PSN) Não suportado Características de Gerenciamento de Energia: Automatic Clock Control Suportado Digital Thermometer Não suportado Enhanced Halt State (C1E) Não suportado Enhanced SpeedStep Technology (EIST, ESS) Não suportado Frequency ID Control Não suportado Hardware P-State Control Não suportado LongRun Não suportado LongRun Table Interface Não suportado PowerSaver 1.0Não suportado PowerSaver 2.0Não suportado PowerSaver 3.0Não suportado Processor Duty Cycle Control Suportado Software Thermal Control Não suportado Temperature Sensing Diode
linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 - turn off SMP and then disable local APIC
Hello! Debian Etch system with linux-image-2.6.18-5-686. How can I turn off SMP and then disable local APIC with this kernel? Any advices will be appreciated! -- Regards, Paul Csanyi http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 - turn off SMP and then disable local APIC
On 09/23/2007 10:50 AM, Pál Csányi wrote: How can I turn off SMP and then disable local APIC with this kernel? For the options to persist across kernel updates/upgrades, add the options 'nosmp' and 'noapic' to /boot/grub/menu.lst on the kopt= line, then run 'update-grub'. This works for all kenel versions. For example, edit: # kopt=root=/dev/sda1 ro to: # kopt=root=/dev/sda1 ro nosmp noapic Then run 'update-grub' and take a look at /boot/grub/menu.lst - you should see your default options added to all the kernel boot blocks. Take a look at the other option sections, if you wish to enable options only in the alternative or non-alternative boot options. -- Kind Regards, Michael Shuler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 - turn off SMP and then disable local APIC
2007/9/23, Pál Csányi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/9/23, Curt Howland [EMAIL PROTECTED]: One thing I forgot to mention, there is little or no performance hit for using an SMP kernel with a single-CPU machine. So I wouldn't worry about that. I have a Dual 2 Core CPU. I must to disable SMP and locale APIC because the NVIDIA driver is not compatible yet with Dual 2 Core processors. Look here: http://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#head-2fcab290c485d544de87c91512fa1f8c626a9530 But if I know how to toggle off NVIDIA's multithread optimizations that would be the better solution. Look here: http://www.nvidia.com/docs/IO/37395/93.71_open.pdf on the 3. page! -- Regards, Paul Csanyi http://www.freewebs.com/csanyi-pal/index.htm
Can you disable SMP in the kernel by appending the kernel line in GRUB
I've been trying to help someone on the list with acpi related shutdown problems, with no success up to now. When I had shutdown problems with FC5 (fixed with using acpi=force), someone on the Fedora list suggested that it could be a problem with SMP kernels. I Googled a bit the other day, and found stuff about recompiling the kernel, and disabling SMP in it, but is there a way to disable SMP by appending the kernel line in GRUB? I read one comment that said: To disable SMP at bootup, use, noreplace-smp Is that an appendment to the kernel line or what? I don't want to suggest something stupid for Mark to try. Any comments, suggestions welcome. Nigel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can you disable SMP in the kernel by appending the kernel line in GRUB
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Nigel Henry wrote: I've been trying to help someone on the list with acpi related shutdown problems, with no success up to now. When I had shutdown problems with FC5 (fixed with using acpi=force), someone on the Fedora list suggested that it could be a problem with SMP kernels. I Googled a bit the other day, and found stuff about recompiling the kernel, and disabling SMP in it, but is there a way to disable SMP by appending the kernel line in GRUB? I read one comment that said: To disable SMP at bootup, use, noreplace-smp Is that an appendment to the kernel line or what? I don't want to suggest something stupid for Mark to try. Any comments, suggestions welcome. Nigel. Yes, you would want to append that to the kernel line in /boot/grub/menu.lst . You may also want to try nosmp or maxcpus=0 , both of those will disable the smp code. -+- 8 out of 10 Owners who Expressed a Preference said Their Cats Preferred Techno. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can you disable SMP in the kernel by appending the kernel line in GRUB
On Monday 20 August 2007 19:24, Jeff D wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Nigel Henry wrote: I've been trying to help someone on the list with acpi related shutdown problems, with no success up to now. When I had shutdown problems with FC5 (fixed with using acpi=force), someone on the Fedora list suggested that it could be a problem with SMP kernels. I Googled a bit the other day, and found stuff about recompiling the kernel, and disabling SMP in it, but is there a way to disable SMP by appending the kernel line in GRUB? I read one comment that said: To disable SMP at bootup, use, noreplace-smp Is that an appendment to the kernel line or what? I don't want to suggest something stupid for Mark to try. Any comments, suggestions welcome. Nigel. Yes, you would want to append that to the kernel line in /boot/grub/menu.lst . You may also want to try nosmp or maxcpus=0 , both of those will disable the smp code. Thanks Jeff for the quick response. All suggestions written down on hard copy for future reference. These acpi related shutdown problems are a real nightmare to resolve. Not everyone is affected. it just seems to happen on some hardware, and later kernels. for example on one of my 2 machines, an old Gateway 500, P111 (katmai), Fc5 shutsdown completely whichever kernel I've booted up with. On a later I-friend machine, FC5 will shutdown completely if I boot with the original 2.6.15 kernel, but booting with revisions of the 2.6.17 kernel, and later, I have to add acpi=force to the kernel line to get it to shutdown completely. My Debian Etch, and Lenny installs on the I-friend machine are using a 2.6.17 kernel, but may be an earlier revision than the FC5 one, and I don't have any shutdown problems with my Debian installs. I'll try and find later kernels for Etch, and Lenny to see if the shutdown problem shows up. Mind you, saying this, a bug report for Ubuntu to Launchpad showed acpi related shutdown problems with 2.6.15 kernels. Many suggestions to append the kernel line with, some worked, others didn't. It's all a bit bizarre. Thanks again for your help. Nigel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mysql and SMP
Hi, In debian stable/testing system, how to force mysql to use multiple CPU (I have Core2 Duo)? I host a Database and all queries are issued by a single user/pass (the frontend). When monitoring the server, mysql never span to the second core... How to? Thank you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sytem freeze on debian 2.6.8-2-686-smp with intel e1000 running tcpdump
Hello, On dual proc Xeon with dual ethernet Intel e1000, when I run a tcpdump, according to network traffic my system freezes. The console is dead, the only way to restore the system is an electric power restart. My configuration is : # uname -a Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp #1 SMP Tue Aug 16 12:08:30 UTC 2005 i686 GNU/Linux # lspci -vv :02:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 05) Subsystem: Dell: Unknown device 019a Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 32 (63750ns min), Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes) Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 201 Region 0: Memory at fe9e (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] Region 2: I/O ports at ecc0 [size=64] Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME- Capabilities: [e4] PCI-X non-bridge device. Command: DPERE- ERO+ RBC=0 OST=0 Status: Bus=0 Dev=0 Func=0 64bit- 133MHz- SCD- USC-, DC=simple, DMMRBC=2, DMOST=0, DMCRS=0, RSCEM- :04:03.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 05) Subsystem: Dell: Unknown device 019a Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 32 (63750ns min), Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes) Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 209 Region 0: Memory at fe5e (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] Region 2: I/O ports at dcc0 [size=64] Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME- Capabilities: [e4] PCI-X non-bridge device. Command: DPERE- ERO+ RBC=0 OST=0 Status: Bus=0 Dev=0 Func=0 64bit- 133MHz- SCD- USC-, DC=simple, DMMRBC=2, DMOST=0, DMCRS=0, RSCEM- # ethtool -i eth0 driver: e1000 version: 5.2.52-k4 firmware-version: N/A bus-info: :02:04.0 # ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 100Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: Twisted Pair PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: umbg Wake-on: d Current message level: 0x0007 (7) Link detected: yes Do you have any idea ou clue on how to solve this ? Thanks Julien
Re: Samba 3.0.24 with Vista Using Debian Etch 2.6.18-47-686 SMP
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote: Hi all, might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a MSFT one! Problem: Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a Samba shared folder (folder could be opened but i's empty...). Same works when used by other XP or NT Windows based PC. I presume the tunning has to be on Vista rather the Linux Samba PC! Any hint? What do the logs say? Regards, -Roberto not much... [2007/03/23 17:59:51, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) hpmob (192.168.2.102) connect to service hpuser initially as user hpuser (uid=1000, gid=1000) (pid 5127) [2007/03/23 18:00:09, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1150) hpmob (192.168.2.102) closed connection to service hpuser [2007/03/23 18:13:09, 0] printing/pcap.c:pcap_cache_reload(159) ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba 3.0.24 with Vista Using Debian Etch 2.6.18-47-686 SMP
Hi all, might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a MSFT one! Problem: Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a Samba shared folder (folder could be opened but i's empty...). Same works when used by other XP or NT Windows based PC. I presume the tunning has to be on Vista rather the Linux Samba PC! Any hint? Thanks and have a nice weekend. JL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Samba 3.0.24 with Vista Using Debian Etch 2.6.18-47-686 SMP
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 03:27:33PM +0100, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote: Hi all, might be the wrong NG for such request but I'm not willing to get into a MSFT one! Problem: Using a recent Vista Family premium, I could not see the content on a Samba shared folder (folder could be opened but i's empty...). Same works when used by other XP or NT Windows based PC. I presume the tunning has to be on Vista rather the Linux Samba PC! Any hint? What do the logs say? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Xen smp
On lør, desember 9, 2006 00:46, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote: Roberto C. Sanchez skrev: On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:15:56PM +0100, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote: Hi list. I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not... Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something wrong? Did you assigne the guest to more than one CPU in your configuration? Is the guest running an SMP kernel? Regards, -Roberto Hmmm, I just used the standard scripts with Etch, thanx a lot though, I had overlooked the fact that I had to specify the number of cpu's in the config. Again, thanx for the tip :) Sturla On to another problem though: I was having trouble booting the domu's the second time, Device 2049 (vbd) could not be connected, and I found a tip about increasing the number of loop-devices, so I added modprobe loop max_devices=64 in /etc/init.d/xend and went on to the next problem: The first domu starts like a charm, so does the next for a couple of seconds before I get a kernel panic about something not syncing (I only have a couple of seconds to read it before the blasted thing reboots) I noticed that the 64 loop devices turns up in /dev/, not in /dev/loop/ (where there's still a 0) don't know if it's supposed to be that way though... Does anyone have a clue about this, and if not can tell med the correct way of increasing the number of loop-devices? Thanx Sturla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xen smp
Hi list. I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not... Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something wrong? Thanx Sturla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xen smp
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:15:56PM +0100, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote: Hi list. I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not... Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something wrong? Did you assigne the guest to more than one CPU in your configuration? Is the guest running an SMP kernel? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Xen smp
Roberto C. Sanchez skrev: On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 09:15:56PM +0100, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote: Hi list. I'm running Xen under Etch and running an instance of Etch under Xen, the host is showing two cpu's but the guest does not... Is smp not supported in the xen-package in Etch or am I doing something wrong? Did you assigne the guest to more than one CPU in your configuration? Is the guest running an SMP kernel? Regards, -Roberto Hmmm, I just used the standard scripts with Etch, thanx a lot though, I had overlooked the fact that I had to specify the number of cpu's in the config. Again, thanx for the tip :) Sturla -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel 2.6 SMP very slow with ServerWorks LE Chipset
Bob wrote: Oleg Verych wrote: 8 8 snip Sorry for the delay, RL has been rather demanding of late. I've installed 2.6.18 from sid but it's displaying the same problems. As a test of CPU power I've been decompressing the kernel tree, with a UP 2.6 kernel this takes about 1m 15s, I don't know if bz2 is multithreaded but even if it's not I would expect a slight speed increase but in fact with a SMP 2.6 kernel it take 13 ~ 15m, with a SMP 2.4 kernel it takes 1m 28s and with a 2.4 UP 1m 35s. with 2.6.18 from sid I get nas:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads:40 MB in 2.22 seconds = 18.04 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 200 MB in 3.01 seconds = 66.47 MB/sec nas:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads: 756 MB in 2.01 seconds = 376.74 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads:8 MB in 3.68 seconds = 2.17 MB/sec nas:~# As you can see it's variable, I've got hda plugged into a SiI680 PCI card as the ServerWorks IDE chipset is not so good. This is driving me nuts, any more ideas, I'll have a go at bugzilla later. Thanks for the help. Sorry, bad form and all that but I just compiled 2.6.19, decompressing the 2.6.18 kernel tree in SMP took 26m and nas:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads:36 MB in 2.00 seconds = 17.96 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 10 MB in 3.04 seconds = 3.29 MB/sec nas:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads: 772 MB in 2.01 seconds = 384.53 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 10 MB in 3.25 seconds = 3.08 MB/sec nas:~# I was thinking of joining the linux.kernel mailing list and posting this there, is that a good idea? nas:~# dmesg Linux version 2.6.19.smp.1.0cur_dls ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)) #1 SMP Sun Dec 3 14:55:47 SGT 2006 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009d400 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009d400 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000eac00 - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - 1fff (usable) BIOS-e820: 1fff - 1c00 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 1c00 - 2000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec1 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fff8 - 0001 (reserved) 511MB LOWMEM available. found SMP MP-table at 000f6f60 Entering add_active_range(0, 0, 131056) 0 entries of 256 used Zone PFN ranges: DMA 0 - 4096 Normal 4096 - 131056 early_node_map[1] active PFN ranges 0:0 - 131056 On node 0 totalpages: 131056 DMA zone: 32 pages used for memmap DMA zone: 0 pages reserved DMA zone: 4064 pages, LIFO batch:0 Normal zone: 991 pages used for memmap Normal zone: 125969 pages, LIFO batch:31 DMI 2.3 present. ACPI: RSDP (v000 PTLTD ) @ 0x000f6f40 ACPI: RSDT (v001 HP HWPC20F 0x06040012 PTL 0x) @ 0x1fffc5eb ACPI: FADT (v001 HP HWPC20F 0x06040012 PTL 0x0001) @ 0x1b05 ACPI: MADT (v001 PTLTDAPIC 0x06040012 LTP 0x) @ 0x1b79 ACPI: BOOT (v001 HP HWPC20F 0x06040012 PTL 0x0001) @ 0x1bd9 ACPI: DSDT (v001 HP HWPC20F 0x06040012 MSFT 0x010b) @ 0x ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x1208 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x03] enabled) Processor #3 6:8 APIC version 17 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 6:8 APIC version 17 ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] high edge lint[0x1]) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge lint[0x1]) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0]) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 1, version 17, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-15 ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec01000] gsi_base[16]) IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 2, version 17, address 0xfec01000, GSI 16-31 ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 2 I/O APICs Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information Allocating PCI resources starting at 3000 (gap: 2000:dec0) Detected 666.711 MHz processor. Built 1 zonelists. Total pages: 130033 Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda1 ro mapped APIC to d000 (fee0) mapped IOAPIC to c000 (fec0) mapped IOAPIC to b000 (fec01000) Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done. Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes) Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Memory: 516352k/524224k available (1771k kernel code, 7376k reserved, 610k data, 200k init, 0k highmem) virtual kernel memory layout: fixmap : 0xfffb7000 - 0xf000 ( 288 kB) vmalloc : 0xd080 - 0xfffb5000 ( 759 MB) lowmem : 0xb000 - 0xcfff ( 511 MB) .init : 0xb0359000 - 0xb038b000 ( 200 kB) .data : 0xb02bac44 - 0xb03535b0 ( 610 kB) .text
Re: Kernel 2.6 SMP very slow with ServerWorks LE Chipset
Oleg Verych wrote: On 2006-11-21, Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [] How about 2.6.18 from sid? If also bad, try bugzilla on kernel.org, or lkml. Is it possible to do this without migrating the whole system to sid? I can't see a backport, one option would be if someone could post the .config file I could compile it in the same way. Sure. And even in various ways, including downloading deb and installing it by hands. But debian way is simpler and better, see man apt_preferences. Kernel is special, any regression users or developers not aware of, may propagate for long time. And finally, when you catch something, the only way is to contact upstream developers in lkml. I think, Debian Kernel Team will be interested only in security stuff. So, deb kernel in Sid is something in between. Sorry for the delay, RL has been rather demanding of late. I've installed 2.6.18 from sid but it's displaying the same problems. As a test of CPU power I've been decompressing the kernel tree, with a UP 2.6 kernel this takes about 1m 15s, I don't know if bz2 is multithreaded but even if it's not I would expect a slight speed increase but in fact with a SMP 2.6 kernel it take 13 ~ 15m, with a SMP 2.4 kernel it takes 1m 28s and with a 2.4 UP 1m 35s. with 2.6.18 from sid I get nas:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads:40 MB in 2.22 seconds = 18.04 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 200 MB in 3.01 seconds = 66.47 MB/sec nas:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads: 756 MB in 2.01 seconds = 376.74 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads:8 MB in 3.68 seconds = 2.17 MB/sec nas:~# As you can see it's variable, I've got hda plugged into a SiI680 PCI card as the ServerWorks IDE chipset is not so good. This is driving me nuts, any more ideas, I'll have a go at bugzilla later. Thanks for the help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xeon cpu, smp sorusu
Merhaba arkadaşlar, Daha önce Dual P3 bir bilgisayara smp kernel yüklemeden 2 cpu görmemişti. Şimdi elimde Xeon 5110 işlemcili bir bilgisayar var. Testingde standart gelen 2.6.17-2-686 kernel ile iki cpu görüyorum (cat /proc/cpuinfo) Sorum, acaba smp kernel yüklesem cpu 4 mü olacak, bu durum normal midir? Teşekkürler. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xeon cpu, smp sorusu
Yılmaz Bilgili yazmış: Merhaba arkadaşlar, Merhaba, Daha önce Dual P3 bir bilgisayara smp kernel yüklemeden 2 cpu görmemişti. Şimdi elimde Xeon 5110 işlemcili bir bilgisayar var. Testingde standart gelen 2.6.17-2-686 kernel ile iki cpu görüyorum (cat /proc/cpuinfo) Sorum, acaba smp kernel yüklesem cpu 4 mü olacak, bu durum normal midir? smp paketleri transition package olarak geçiyor artık: http://packages.debian.org/testing/admin/linux-image-2.6-686-smp 686 paketleri, smp geliştirmelerini de içeriyor artık. Bu yüzden smp'ler sadece emniyet sübapları şu anda :) Yani kurmanıza gerek yok. Teşekkürler. İyi akşamlar. _ Murat Sağlam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMP/PREEMPT deaktivieren
Hallo, wg. eines Treibers sollte ich folgendes machen. Troubleshooting Tips for rt2570 1. Stability issues can be addressed by disabling USB2.0 (ehci) and dropping back to USB1.1 (ohci). You can do this by blacklisting the ehci module 2. If you have SMP enabled, turn it off 3. If you have PREEMPT enabled, turn it off Was mich interessieren wuerde (2 und 3) : gibt es eine schnell-schnell Option (z.B: echo 0 /proc oder einen Lilo append... parameter) Option oder muss ein zweiter Kernel erstellt werden? lg wolfgang -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: SMP/PREEMPT deaktivieren
Am Mittwoch 15 November 2006 11:34 schrieb Wolfgang.friedl: 2. If you have SMP enabled, turn it off Kernel-Parameter nosmp (siehe auch pfad-zu-deinen-kernel-quellen/Documentation/kernel-parameter.txt) 3. If you have PREEMPT enabled, turn it off Muss (zumindes bei einem 2.6er Kernel) wohl ein neuer Kernel her... Gruß Chris -- A: because it distrupts the normal process of thought Q: why is top posting frowned upon
Re: SMP Bootprobleme
Gruesse! * Daniel Haensse [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am [11.11.06 13:22]: Hallo liste, habe Probleme beim Booten von einem SMP Kernel unter Etch. Das System ist ein AMD Dual Core Prozessor, der in einem ASUS M2NPV-VM steckt (NVIDIA GeForce 6150 und NVIDIA nForce 430 Chipsatz und 2GB Speicher). [Log-Meldungen] Idee was das Problem sein könnte? Keine Ahnung ob dein Problem noch aktuell ist (und direkte Tips habe ich auch keine), aber: Evtl. ein BIOS-Upgrade nötig/möglich? Stöbere mal in der kernel-parameters.txt, dort gibt es etliche Parameter, die mit Bios (strict bios, bios_irq,...) zu tun haben. Auch apic bzw. lapic Parameter, wobei das Ausschalten von APIC bei SMP ja IMHO keinen Sinn macht. Evtl. auch die Parameter zu ACPI. Viel Glück! Gruss Dani Gruß Gerhard -- Linux ist wenn es trotzdem geht...
SMP Bootprobleme
Hallo liste, habe Probleme beim Booten von einem SMP Kernel unter Etch. Das System ist ein AMD Dual Core Prozessor, der in einem ASUS M2NPV-VM steckt (NVIDIA GeForce 6150 und NVIDIA nForce 430 Chipsatz und 2GB Speicher). Wenn ich das Kernel 2.6.16-2-amd64-generic boote, dann bekomme ich folgende Meldung beim Booten, das System läuft aber korrekt. Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: io scheduler anticipatory registered (default) Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: io scheduler deadline registered Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: io scheduler cfq registered Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: pcie_portdrv_probe-Dev[02fc:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: pcie_portdrv_probe-Dev[02fd:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: pcie_portdrv_probe-Dev[02fb:10de] has invalid IRQ. Check vendor BIOS Nov 11 19:17:07 virtual kernel: assign_interrupt_mode Found MSI capability Mit dem SMP (z.B. linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8-smp oder linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64-k8-smp) bleibt es aber stecken bei io scheduler cfq registered, danach kommt nichts mehr und System steht. Idee was das Problem sein könnte? Gruss Dani -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Hallo Alexander, Alexander Nagel, 02.10.2006 (d.m.y): The link /vmlinuz is a damaged link Removing symbolic link vmlinuz Unless you used the optional flag in lilo, you may need to re-run lilo The link /initrd.img is a damaged link Removing symbolic link initrd.img Unless you used the optional flag in lilo, you may need to re-run lilo Lösche Konfigurationsdateien von linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp ... Running postrm hook /sbin/update-grub . Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.17-2-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done [..] Mit apt-get -f install wurde es nicht besser, das Problem ist dass synaptic das Paket als nicht richtig entfernt markiert und deshalb meckert. Wie kann man erfahren warum das Paket nicht richtig entfernt wurde und wie kann man das händisch fixen? Ich wuerde es mal mit dem Loeschen der angemahnten symbolischen Links versuchen. Gruss/Regards, Christian Schmidt -- Der Atheismus ist eine Form der Religion, vielleicht sogar der echten. -- Hans F. Geyer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: SMP
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:06:00PM +0200, Christoph Schaman wrote: Hallo, Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote: Hallo Liste, ich habe hier neu erworben einen HP Server mit einem P4 Prozessor. Meines Wissens habe ich keinen Dualcore gekauft sondern einen ganz einfachen P4. Es wir einen CPU in /proc/cpuinfo gemeldet. Welcher P4 ist es denn? Davon gibt es naemlich einige, die auch sehr verschiedene Eigenschaften haben (z.B. HT, nicht HT, em64T, welche version von em64T [sprich, wieviel adressraum hat man wirklich], caches (L1,L2), welche FPU, 64/32 bit, wie ist es wirklich mit 64 bit, c.) Nach meiner Erfahrung unterscheiden sich die Modelle der P4-Reihe mehr als die Vorgaengerreihen untereinander. Hallo Zusammen, war ein paar Tage weg und werde mal hier im Thread ansetzen. Das Hersteller HP spricht vom Model 630 cpuinfo sagt uns processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping: 10 cpu MHz : 3000.268 cache size : 2048 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 3 wp : yes flags : fpu tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 6004.65 cpuid eax ineax ebx ecx edx 0003 756e6547 6c65746e 49656e69 0001 0f4a 00020800 649d bfebfbff 0002 605b5001 007d7040 0003 8000 8008 8001 0001 2010 8002 20202020 20202020 20202020 6e492020 8003 286c6574 50202952 69746e65 52286d75 8004 20342029 20555043 30302e33 007a4847 8005 8006 08006040 8007 8008 3024 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel; CPUID level 3 Intel-specific functions: Version 0f4a: Type 0 - Original OEM Family 15 - Pentium 4 Extended family 0 Model 4 - Stepping 10 Reserved 0 Extended brand string: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz CLFLUSH instruction cache line size: 8 Hyper threading siblings: 2 Feature flags bfebfbff: FPUFloating Point Unit VMEVirtual 8086 Mode Enhancements DE Debugging Extensions PSEPage Size Extensions TSCTime Stamp Counter MSRModel Specific Registers PAEPhysical Address Extension MCEMachine Check Exception CX8COMPXCHG8B Instruction APIC On-chip Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller present and enabled SEPFast System Call MTRR Memory Type Range Registers PGEPTE Global Flag MCAMachine Check Architecture CMOV Conditional Move and Compare Instructions FGPAT Page Attribute Table PSE-36 36-bit Page Size Extension CLFSH CFLUSH instruction DS Debug store ACPI Thermal Monitor and Clock Ctrl MMXMMX instruction set FXSR Fast FP/MMX Streaming SIMD Extensions save/restore SSEStreaming SIMD Extensions instruction set SSE2 SSE2 extensions SS Self Snoop HT Hyper Threading TM Thermal monitor 31 reserved TLB and cache info: 50: Instruction TLB: 4KB and 2MB or 4MB pages, 64 entries 5b: Data TLB: 4KB and 4MB pages, 64 entries 60: unknown TLB/cache descriptor 40: No 2nd-level cache, or if 2nd-level cache exists, no 3rd-level cache 70: Trace cache: 12K-micro-op, 4-way set assoc 7d: unknown TLB/cache descriptor Processor serial: -0F4A---- Auf die 2 CPUs bei top, xen, etc. kommt man nur wenn der kernel smp kann sonst bleibt es immer nur eine. Offensichtlich hat das was mit HT zu tun. Es ist mir jedenfalls nicht schade drum. Vielen Dank für Eure Infos Grüße c-toph -- best regards Schoene Gruesse Christoph Marcel Hilberg -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: SMP
Hallo, Paul Puschmann wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:06:00PM +0200, Christoph Schaman wrote: Hallo, [c.] Ich würde hier eher sagen _weil_ es ht ist, hat er nur eine Id. Bin absolut Deiner Meinung, vielleicht hatte ich's unklar formuliert. Ein Intel Core 2 Duo (T7200) wird hier wie folgt ausgegeben: Linux Knoppix 2.6.17 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 10 13:53:45 CEST 2006 i686 GNU/Linux ... physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 ... ... physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 ... Paul Ich glaube, das ist auch der Hinweis auf die Unterscheidung, wie Du oben schriebst: Du siehst 2 CPU cores, und unterschiedliche core ids. Interessant ist (fuer mich) nach wie vor der Wert siblings, kann Deine Maschine vielleicht auch HT? Weiters wuerde mich interessieren, ob man diesen Unterschied (HT--2core) auch vor SMP-Kernel sieht, sprich ob Du vielleicht noch ein cpuinfo von vor dem Kernel-Kompilieren haettest, wie ich schrieb habe ich ja keines mehr; und ob top bei Dir 1 oder 2 CPUs zeigt, ich wuerde mal auf 2 tippen, aber was weiss man (oder ums anders zu formulieren, woher hat top seine CPUinfo?). GRUESSE Christoph -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: SMP
Hallo, Matthias Haegele wrote: Christoph Schaman schrieb: Hallo, Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote: Hallo Liste, [...] [c.] Kann man das nicht *irgendwie* auslesen die Modellbezeichnung z.B. und daraus dann Rückschlüsse ziehen, ansonsten müsste er sich die Wärmeleitpaste auf jeden Fall noch bereitlegen ... [c.] Ja, ich glaub schon, und zwar ist es der Eintrag in /proc/cpuinfo, der da zaehlt: ... cpu family : 15 model : 4 ... Nur den muss man dann halt wieder bei intel nachschauen, um herauszufinden, was das heisst (und Intel macht einem das nicht gerade leicht). Die Methode das physikalisch an der CPU nachzusehen wollte ich nur als letzten Ausweg noch angeben, falls alles andere nicht klappt (und der Vollstaendigkeit halber). Du hast natuerlich recht, es ist vielleicht nicht so gut, jemanden zum zerlegen seines Kuehlers zu ermuntern; aber ich denke die natuerliche Scheu vor dem Geraet sollte und wird Ihn, C.M. Hilberg, diesen Schritt als letztes setzen lassen. Vielleicht weiss jemand mehr ueber dieses Problem an nicht Intel/AMD - CPUs, dass heisst bei solchen, die einen niedrigeren CPUinfo-level besitzen? MH GRUESSE Christoph PS Bitte um Verzeihung fuer die PM an Matthias Haegele, war ein Versehen und soll nicht mehr passieren! -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: SMP
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:47:47PM +0200, Christoph Schaman wrote: Hallo, Paul Puschmann wrote: On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:06:00PM +0200, Christoph Schaman wrote: Hallo, [c.] Ich würde hier eher sagen _weil_ es ht ist, hat er nur eine Id. Bin absolut Deiner Meinung, vielleicht hatte ich's unklar formuliert. Ein Intel Core 2 Duo (T7200) wird hier wie folgt ausgegeben: Linux Knoppix 2.6.17 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 10 13:53:45 CEST 2006 i686 GNU/Linux ... physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 ... ... physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 ... Paul Ich glaube, das ist auch der Hinweis auf die Unterscheidung, wie Du oben schriebst: Du siehst 2 CPU cores, und unterschiedliche core ids. Interessant ist (fuer mich) nach wie vor der Wert siblings, kann Deine Maschine vielleicht auch HT? HT ist nur bei den Pentium4 (+ evtl. Celeron und Xeon) im Einsatz gewesen und sollte im Core-Prozessor nicht mehr vorhanden sein. Weiters wuerde mich interessieren, ob man diesen Unterschied (HT--2core) auch vor SMP-Kernel sieht, sprich ob Du vielleicht noch ein cpuinfo von vor dem Kernel-Kompilieren haettest, wie ich schrieb habe ich ja keines mehr; und ob top bei Dir 1 oder 2 CPUs zeigt, ich wuerde mal auf 2 tippen, aber was weiss man (oder ums anders zu formulieren, woher hat top seine CPUinfo?). Dazu muss man doch einfach nur in den Quelltext von top schauen ;). Ich habe auf dem System gerade ein Knoppix 5.0.1, da das Gerät bei mir nur leihweise ist. In top habe ich CPU0 und CPU1 (die view mit 1 aktiviert). Mit dem einfachen kcalc-Test habe ich noch festgestellt, dass ein Prozess anscheinden gerne auf die erste CPU verschoben wird. proc-id 4225 lief auf CPU0, proc-id 4226 auf CPU1. 4225 gekillt und 4226 ist nach CPU1 gewandert. Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: SMP
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:03:27PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 16.10.06 22:47:27, Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote: ich habe hier neu erworben einen HP Server mit einem P4 Prozessor. Meines Wissens habe ich keinen Dualcore gekauft sondern einen ganz einfachen P4. Es wir einen CPU in /proc/cpuinfo gemeldet. Jedoch acpi, xen und top melden zwei cpus wie kommt das? Wenn ich zwei rechenintensive Jobs losschicke komme ich auch auf über 100% Cpuauslastung. Hängt das mit dem HT zusammen oder wie erklärt sich dieser Effekt? Richtig, durch das HT sehen diese Tools 2 Prozessoren. Was ja auch teilweise richtig ist, da einige Teile des Prozessors doppelt sind. aber /proc/cpuinfo sollte dann auch 2 Prozessoren liefern und nicht nur einen. Wenn du bei (im Bios) aktiviertem HT einen SMP-Kernel lädst, sollten zwei CPU angezeigt werden. Bei einem normalen Kernel halt nur einer. Aber: Der Kernel in Etch (und sicher auch Sid) ist ein SMP-Kernel. Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: SMP
Hallo, Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote: Hallo Liste, ich habe hier neu erworben einen HP Server mit einem P4 Prozessor. Meines Wissens habe ich keinen Dualcore gekauft sondern einen ganz einfachen P4. Es wir einen CPU in /proc/cpuinfo gemeldet. Welcher P4 ist es denn? Davon gibt es naemlich einige, die auch sehr verschiedene Eigenschaften haben (z.B. HT, nicht HT, em64T, welche version von em64T [sprich, wieviel adressraum hat man wirklich], caches (L1,L2), welche FPU, 64/32 bit, wie ist es wirklich mit 64 bit, c.) Nach meiner Erfahrung unterscheiden sich die Modelle der P4-Reihe mehr als die Vorgaengerreihen untereinander. Jedoch acpi, xen und top melden zwei cpus wie kommt das? Wenn ich zwei rechenintensive Jobs losschicke komme ich auch auf über 100% Cpuauslastung. Hängt das mit dem HT zusammen oder wie erklärt sich dieser Effekt? Wie oben gesagt, ich glaube es haengt davon ab welcher P4 es ist. Hier bei mir lauft ein Prescott P4 (genauer, die 950-er Serie, familie 15, modell 4), welcher als 2 CPUs (mit derselben ID) erkannt wird, obwohl es kein dual core ist, sondern HT; ich hatte allerdings nicht ausprobiert, ob mit dem eigenen Kernel die 2 CPUs erkannt werden, sondern gleich einen eigenen Kernel kompiliert, weiss also nicht ob SMP die Anzahl der CPUs fuer top aendert, weil z.B. dann SMP zwischen echtem dual core und HT unterscheiden kann. Damit kann ich laut top 200% der CPU auslasten, aber die wird mir nur als einzelne angezeigt, da selbe CPUID. /proc/cpuinfo sagt bei mir: ... physical id: 0 siblings: 2 core id: 0 cpu cores: 1 ... physical id: 0 siblings: 2 core id: 0 cpu cores: 1 ... ,also ich habe zwei CPUs mit derselben ID; der Kernel ist SMP-enabled 2.6.16, und kann damit gut umgehen. Moeglicherweise bedeutet der Wert siblings: 2, dass ich HT habe, aber das weiss ich leider nicht genau (wenn ich das wort uebersetze: saeuglings-wert). c-toph Ich haenge Dir ein vollstaendiges /proc/cpuinfo an, damit Du vergleichen kannst; acpi sagt mir, es gaebe nur eine CPU, xen laeuft hier nicht. Irgenwo solltest Du auch (vom Kauf) die Info ueber das Modell Deines P4 haben, dann koennte man ja bei intel nachschauen, was die CPU kann bzw. koennen sollte. Falls dies nicht mehr vorhanden ist kann man immer den Rechner aufmachen, den Luefter (natuerlich sehr vorsichtig) entfernen, und direkt auf der CPU nachlesen, was das ist (ist dann wieder ein eigener Code, den man unter intel nachschauen kann). Summa summarum, ich wuerde glauben dass Du eine dual core CPU hast, zwei Xeons wahrscheinlich. GRUESSE soweit Christoph processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping: 3 cpu MHz : 3000.000 cache size : 2048 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr bogomips: 6031.34 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 128 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping: 3 cpu MHz : 3000.000 cache size : 2048 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl est cid cx16 xtpr bogomips: 6022.01 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 128 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
Re: SMP
Christoph Schaman schrieb: Hallo, Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote: Hallo Liste, [...] Ich haenge Dir ein vollstaendiges /proc/cpuinfo an, damit Du vergleichen kannst; acpi sagt mir, es gaebe nur eine CPU, xen laeuft hier nicht. Irgenwo solltest Du auch (vom Kauf) die Info ueber das Modell Deines P4 haben, dann koennte man ja bei intel nachschauen, was die CPU kann bzw. koennen sollte. Falls dies nicht mehr vorhanden ist kann man immer den Rechner aufmachen, den Luefter (natuerlich sehr vorsichtig) entfernen, und direkt auf der CPU nachlesen, was das ist (ist dann wieder ein eigener Code, den man unter intel nachschauen kann). Kann man das nicht *irgendwie* auslesen die Modellbezeichnung z.B. und daraus dann Rückschlüsse ziehen, ansonsten müsste er sich die Wärmeleitpaste auf jeden Fall noch bereitlegen ... Summa summarum, ich wuerde glauben dass Du eine dual core CPU hast, zwei Xeons wahrscheinlich. GRUESSE soweit Christoph MH -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: SMP
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:06:00PM +0200, Christoph Schaman wrote: Hallo, Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote: Hallo Liste, ich habe hier neu erworben einen HP Server mit einem P4 Prozessor. Meines Wissens habe ich keinen Dualcore gekauft sondern einen ganz einfachen P4. Es wir einen CPU in /proc/cpuinfo gemeldet. Welcher P4 ist es denn? Davon gibt es naemlich einige, die auch sehr verschiedene Eigenschaften haben (z.B. HT, nicht HT, em64T, welche version von em64T [sprich, wieviel adressraum hat man wirklich], caches (L1,L2), welche FPU, 64/32 bit, wie ist es wirklich mit 64 bit, c.) Nach meiner Erfahrung unterscheiden sich die Modelle der P4-Reihe mehr als die Vorgaengerreihen untereinander. Jedoch acpi, xen und top melden zwei cpus wie kommt das? Wenn ich zwei rechenintensive Jobs losschicke komme ich auch auf über 100% Cpuauslastung. Hängt das mit dem HT zusammen oder wie erklärt sich dieser Effekt? Wie oben gesagt, ich glaube es haengt davon ab welcher P4 es ist. Hier bei mir lauft ein Prescott P4 (genauer, die 950-er Serie, familie 15, modell 4), welcher als 2 CPUs (mit derselben ID) erkannt wird, obwohl es kein dual core ist, sondern HT; Ich würde hier eher sagen _weil_ es ht ist, hat er nur eine Id. Ein Intel Core 2 Duo (T7200) wird hier wie folgt ausgegeben: Linux Knoppix 2.6.17 #4 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 10 13:53:45 CEST 2006 i686 GNU/Linux processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz stepping: 6 cpu MHz : 1995.328 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 3996.67 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz stepping: 6 cpu MHz : 1995.328 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 3990.34 Paul signature.asc Description: Digital signature
SMP
Hallo Liste, ich habe hier neu erworben einen HP Server mit einem P4 Prozessor. Meines Wissens habe ich keinen Dualcore gekauft sondern einen ganz einfachen P4. Es wir einen CPU in /proc/cpuinfo gemeldet. Jedoch acpi, xen und top melden zwei cpus wie kommt das? Wenn ich zwei rechenintensive Jobs losschicke komme ich auch auf über 100% Cpuauslastung. Hängt das mit dem HT zusammen oder wie erklärt sich dieser Effekt? c-toph -- best regards Schoene Gruesse Christoph Marcel Hilberg -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: SMP
On 16.10.06 22:47:27, Christoph Marcel Hilberg wrote: ich habe hier neu erworben einen HP Server mit einem P4 Prozessor. Meines Wissens habe ich keinen Dualcore gekauft sondern einen ganz einfachen P4. Es wir einen CPU in /proc/cpuinfo gemeldet. Jedoch acpi, xen und top melden zwei cpus wie kommt das? Wenn ich zwei rechenintensive Jobs losschicke komme ich auch auf über 100% Cpuauslastung. Hängt das mit dem HT zusammen oder wie erklärt sich dieser Effekt? Richtig, durch das HT sehen diese Tools 2 Prozessoren. Was ja auch teilweise richtig ist, da einige Teile des Prozessors doppelt sind. Andreas -- Your sister swims out to meet troop ships. -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
smp??
Hi! Im running sid with kernel 2.6.16-1-686-smp I want to upgrade the kernel. The question is: Does the package linux-image-2.6.18-1-686-bigmem is smp? or where are the 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 smp images? Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: smp??
Enrique Morfin wrote: Does the package linux-image-2.6.18-1-686-bigmem is smp? Linux supports smp-alternatives since 2.6.17. This means, that additional processors can be added dynamically while the boot process of the kernel. Or in other words: all Debians kernel images do support smp (i386, powerpc and some other archs). -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: smp??
Linux supports smp-alternatives since 2.6.17. This means, that additional processors can be added dynamically while the boot process of the kernel. Or in other words: all Debians kernel images do support smp (i386,powerpc and some other archs). Thanks for the info. can a procesor be stoped while the system is running? started? if so, how i make this? Can i asign a proces to a single porcesor? How? Can i asign a procesor to a single proces? How? Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMP with ACPI disabled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Madden wrote: [[snip]] I don't have an answer.I thought ACPI was for power management, esp laptops, a heavily used server doesn't seem to me to need power management. I have a smp PIII Gz that gives me fits, IRQ allocation on the pci slots. This is a APIC issue, and the easiest solution was not to use certain cards in the box. Is that two cpu's with hyperthreading or two core duo cpu's? Greetings: ACPI does a lot more than just power management. It handles PCI routing setup and much of the initial hardware setup and discovery. As to the original topic of what happened to the other two cores, the local APICs that are being discovered and configured by ACPI are required for multiple CPUs to be used. The answer to is it possible to work around is dependent on you motherboard, and all evidence points to no. http://www.adriansrojakpot.com/Speed_Demonz/New_BIOS_Guide/APIC_Function.htm has a more detailed explanation. - -Scott -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFJPfPS7FYdPX6+iYRArKSAJ0S5xMcNwGb8ekaCWZ6B7SUj2FRCQCfUO+u sEOHoI21G264nKzCjT4iz1E= =3IlK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMP with ACPI disabled
Hi all... I have a dual Xeon machine that was running fine on all four cores, but then I started getting some filesystem corruption because of dodgy RAID drivers. I disabled ACPI, which fixed this, but now I am down to running on two cores. My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all four cores) without ACPI? Cheers, Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMP with ACPI disabled
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:34:38PM +1300, Matt Parlane wrote: Hi all... I have a dual Xeon machine that was running fine on all four cores, but then I started getting some filesystem corruption because of dodgy RAID drivers. I disabled ACPI, which fixed this, but now I am down to running on two cores. My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all four cores) without ACPI? If you are running on two cores, and you see both in /proc/cpuinfo, then you have SMP enabled. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: SMP with ACPI disabled
On 10/5/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a dual Xeon machine that was running fine on all four cores, but then I started getting some filesystem corruption because of dodgy RAID drivers. I disabled ACPI, which fixed this, but now I am down to running on two cores. My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all four cores) without ACPI? If you are running on two cores, and you see both in /proc/cpuinfo, then you have SMP enabled. I can see two cores in /proc/cpuinfo, but I used to see four, since the processors are both dual core (sorry, I should have mentioned this). I'm not sure if I'm only running on one physical processor or one core from each processor, but I'm definitely only running on two cores, and I was running on four cores before, and the only change I made was disabling ACPI. I have the dmesg output from before (with ACPI) and now (without ACPI) if anyone is interested: http://www.webgenius.co.nz/dmesg-acpi.txt http://www.webgenius.co.nz/dmesg-noacpi.txt Cheers, Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMP with ACPI disabled
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:54:39 +1300 Matt Parlane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/5/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a dual Xeon machine that was running fine on all four cores, but then I started getting some filesystem corruption because of dodgy RAID drivers. I disabled ACPI, which fixed this, but now I am down to running on two cores. My question is, is there any way to run SMP (that will give me all four cores) without ACPI? If you are running on two cores, and you see both in /proc/cpuinfo, then you have SMP enabled. I can see two cores in /proc/cpuinfo, but I used to see four, since the processors are both dual core (sorry, I should have mentioned this). I'm not sure if I'm only running on one physical processor or one core from each processor, but I'm definitely only running on two cores, and I was running on four cores before, and the only change I made was disabling ACPI. I have the dmesg output from before (with ACPI) and now (without ACPI) if anyone is interested: http://www.webgenius.co.nz/dmesg-acpi.txt http://www.webgenius.co.nz/dmesg-noacpi.txt Cheers, Matt I don't have an answer.I thought ACPI was for power management, esp laptops, a heavily used server doesn't seem to me to need power management. I have a smp PIII Gz that gives me fits, IRQ allocation on the pci slots. This is a APIC issue, and the easiest solution was not to use certain cards in the box. Is that two cpu's with hyperthreading or two core duo cpu's? -- Greg Madden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMP with ACPI disabled
On 10/5/06, Greg Madden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't have an answer.I thought ACPI was for power management, esp laptops, a heavily used server doesn't seem to me to need power management. I have a smp PIII Gz that gives me fits, IRQ allocation on the pci slots. This is a APIC issue, and the easiest solution was not to use certain cards in the box. Is that two cpu's with hyperthreading or two core duo cpu's? It's two processors each with two cores, no hyperthreading. Cheers, Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Hallo allerseits, ich habe gerade den oben genannten Kernel deinstalliert und als Antwort kam: apt-get --purge remove linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp* 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 1 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. Es müssen 0B Archive geholt werden. Nach dem Auspacken werden 45,1MB Plattenplatz freigegeben worden sein. Möchten Sie fortfahren [J/n]? j (Lese Datenbank ... 79838 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.) Entferne linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp ... Running postrm hook /sbin/update-grub . Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.17-2-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done The link /vmlinuz is a damaged link Removing symbolic link vmlinuz Unless you used the optional flag in lilo, you may need to re-run lilo The link /initrd.img is a damaged link Removing symbolic link initrd.img Unless you used the optional flag in lilo, you may need to re-run lilo Lösche Konfigurationsdateien von linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp ... Running postrm hook /sbin/update-grub . Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Testing for an existing GRUB menu.lst file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.17-2-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp (--purge): Unterprozess post-removal script gab den Fehlerwert 128 zurück Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Mit apt-get -f install wurde es nicht besser, das Problem ist dass synaptic das Paket als nicht richtig entfernt markiert und deshalb meckert. Wie kann man erfahren warum das Paket nicht richtig entfernt wurde und wie kann man das händisch fixen? Alex -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
problem przy kompilacji jądra z smp
Witam używam debiana sarge mam zainstalowane jadro 2.6.8-3-686-smp i wszystko chodzi jak trzeba ale zachciało mi kompilowac własne więcv skompilowałem sobie jądro 2.6.17.13 z smp. problem w tym że nie mam sieci. w czasie bootowania pisze że eth0 zasoby są zajęte przez inny proces czy coś w tym stylu. jak pinguje server to czasami przez chwilę wyświetla normalnie i chwilę potem nic się nie dzieje jak powtórze to host unreachable. a jak pinguję swoją kartę to mam normalne dane z wyjścia. w każdym razie net nie działa. jak wracam na stare jądro wszystko w pożądku.jest to moje pierwsze jajko z SMP i nie wiem za bardzo na co zwrócić uwagę. załączam mój config może coś znajdziecie. proszę o sugestie i dzięki # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.17.13 # Thu Sep 14 22:40:32 2006 # CONFIG_X86_32=y CONFIG_SEMAPHORE_SLEEPERS=y CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_MMU=y CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y CONFIG_GENERIC_HWEIGHT=y CONFIG_ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC=y CONFIG_DMI=y # # Code maturity level options # # CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is not set CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL=y CONFIG_INIT_ENV_ARG_LIMIT=32 # # General setup # CONFIG_LOCALVERSION= # CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not set CONFIG_SWAP=y CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y # CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3 is not set CONFIG_SYSCTL=y # CONFIG_AUDIT is not set CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y # CONFIG_CPUSETS is not set # CONFIG_RELAY is not set CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE= CONFIG_UID16=y CONFIG_VM86=y # CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not set CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y # CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y CONFIG_PRINTK=y CONFIG_BUG=y CONFIG_ELF_CORE=y CONFIG_BASE_FULL=y CONFIG_FUTEX=y CONFIG_EPOLL=y CONFIG_SHMEM=y CONFIG_SLAB=y # CONFIG_TINY_SHMEM is not set CONFIG_BASE_SMALL=0 # CONFIG_SLOB is not set # # Loadable module support # CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y # CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set # CONFIG_MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL is not set CONFIG_KMOD=y CONFIG_STOP_MACHINE=y # # Block layer # # CONFIG_LBD is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE is not set # CONFIG_LSF is not set # # IO Schedulers # CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y # CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS is not set # CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE is not set CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=m # CONFIG_DEFAULT_AS is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEADLINE is not set # CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ is not set CONFIG_DEFAULT_NOOP=y CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED=noop # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_SMP=y CONFIG_X86_PC=y # CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set # CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER is not set # CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ is not set # CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT is not set # CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP is not set # CONFIG_X86_VISWS is not set # CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is not set # CONFIG_X86_ES7000 is not set # CONFIG_M386 is not set # CONFIG_M486 is not set # CONFIG_M586 is not set # CONFIG_M586TSC is not set # CONFIG_M586MMX is not set # CONFIG_M686 is not set CONFIG_MPENTIUMII=y # CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUMM is not set # CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set # CONFIG_MK6 is not set # CONFIG_MK7 is not set # CONFIG_MK8 is not set # CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set # CONFIG_MEFFICEON is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP2 is not set # CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set # CONFIG_MGEODEGX1 is not set # CONFIG_MGEODE_LX is not set # CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set # CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set # CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is not set CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y CONFIG_X86_XADD=y CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=5 CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y CONFIG_GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY=y CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64=y CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY=y CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y CONFIG_X86_TSC=y # CONFIG_HPET_TIMER is not set CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2 # CONFIG_SCHED_SMT is not set # CONFIG_SCHED_MC is not set # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set CONFIG_PREEMPT=y CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y CONFIG_X86_MCE=y # CONFIG_X86_MCE_NONFATAL is not set # CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL is not set # CONFIG_TOSHIBA is not set # CONFIG_I8K is not set # CONFIG_X86_REBOOTFIXUPS is not set # CONFIG_MICROCODE is not set CONFIG_X86_MSR=y CONFIG_X86_CPUID=y # # Firmware Drivers # # CONFIG_DELL_RBU is not set # CONFIG_DCDBAS is not set CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y # CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC000 CONFIG_FLATMEM=y CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP=y # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_STATIC is not set CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS=4 # CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set CONFIG_MTRR=y # CONFIG_EFI is not set # CONFIG_IRQBALANCE is not set CONFIG_REGPARM=y CONFIG_SECCOMP=y # CONFIG_HZ_100 is not set CONFIG_HZ_250=y # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set CONFIG_HZ=250 CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x10 # # Power management options (ACPI, APM) # CONFIG_PM=y CONFIG_PM_LEGACY=y # CONFIG_PM_DEBUG is not set # # ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support # CONFIG_ACPI=y # CONFIG_ACPI_AC is not set # CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY is not set
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Am 2006-09-12 19:16:54, schrieb Sven Hartge: Mag sein. Ich sehe nur nicht den Sinn darin, wenn man von ein Gerät weniger mal absieht. Allerdings sehe ich mehr Probleme, die durch so eine Karte entstehen (Software-unabhängig) als man damit lösen könnte. Es gibt ADSL-(PCI)Karten die Router sind. Haben einen ARM drauf und laufen mit embedded Linux. Hatte mich dafür interessiert, nur keinen Hersteller und auch keinen deutschen Anbieter dafür gefunden. Habe ein kompaktes System in einem NMEA68 Gehäuse und bin auf der Suche nach einer ADSL-Router-Karte. Hatte auch shon dran gedacht, einen einfachen ADSL2+ Router zu nehmen und das Gehäuse zu entfernen um es unterzubringen, hat aber den Nachteil, das WENN der Router mal abstürzt, Du nicht an den Resetknopf kommst. Die ADSL-Router-Karten kann man beim Booten direkt über einen Shortcut erreichen, wie z.B. das BIOS von SCSI-Karten. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Hallo Uwe, habe gerade Deine Message gefunden und... Am 2006-09-10 20:36:31, schrieb Uwe Kerstan: Das wollte ich vermeiden. Ich warte jetzt bis Dezember, mal sehen ob dann noch SMP im normalen Kernel aktiviert ist. Dann kann ich ??? Der NORMALE Kernel ist OHNE SMP. Ich habe hier einen 2.6.17-k7 installiert und der ist definitiv ohne SMP, sonst würde nämlich mein alter Athlon MP 1900 nicht starten. Dieser Steinzeit SMP benötigt nen Eigenbau-SMP-Kernel. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Am 2006-09-10 10:26:06, schrieb Uwe Kerstan: linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7_2.6.17-8_i386.deb ist HIER mit SMP! Ups... Da ich Off-Line bin, habe ich noch nicht upgedated... Bin ein paar -* Revisionen im rückstand, und meiner hat KEIN SMP. Der SMP-Kernel startet nicht auf meinem Athlon MP 1900. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/6/6192519367100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
* Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11-09-2006 12:34]: _Ich_ habe das in größerem Stil getan, bzw. bei der Neuanschaffung gleich auf Karten mit z.B. HFC-Chip gesetzt. Okay, ich werde meine Karte auch entsorgen. Bei Ubuntu sind die Kernel mittlerweile alle mit SMP kompiliert, weil der Kernel automatisch erkennt, ob es nur ein UP-System ist und dann andere Code-Pfade wählt, so dass ein SMP-Kernel nicht mehr langsamer auf einem UP-System ist. Ich habe gesehen, dass Ubuntu in unstable auch AVM-Firmware und Kernelsourcen (für 2.6.17) bereit stellt. Da ich bei Ubuntu keine außerplanmäßigen Patche gefunden habe, gehe ich davon aus, dass die Treiber bei Ubuntu auch nicht funktionieren werden ... Daher hat man sich wohl entschieden, alle Kernel gleich für SMP zu bauen, da man so die Anzahl der Kernel-Pakete reduzieren konnte. Das ist eine vernüftige Entscheidung. Ich habe mal einen 2.6.17 ohne SMP compiliert, weil Abschalten per nosmp auch nicht hilft. Das Problem bleibt das selbe, nach Laden des Moduls und capiinit kommt auch hier die Kernelpanic. Es liegt also nicht am Debiankernel. Naja, die Karte muss weg, weil: 'End Of Maintenance state (EOM)' siehe auch: http://www.avm.de/de/Service/Service-Portale/Service-Portal/Linux_Praxis_und_Tipps/controller_liste.php Bei eb*y wird sich schon ein Wind*zer finden. ;-) Gruss Uwe signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11-09-2006 12:34]: _Ich_ habe das in größerem Stil getan, bzw. bei der Neuanschaffung gleich auf Karten mit z.B. HFC-Chip gesetzt. Okay, ich werde meine Karte auch entsorgen. Wobei ich gerade sehe, das du eine DSL-Karte benutzt. Hier gibt es kein Equivalent, aber ich rate dir eh, ein externes Modem und eine normale Ethernetkarte zu benutzen. Das ist schmerzfreier und flexibler. Bei Ubuntu sind die Kernel mittlerweile alle mit SMP kompiliert, weil der Kernel automatisch erkennt, ob es nur ein UP-System ist und dann andere Code-Pfade wählt, so dass ein SMP-Kernel nicht mehr langsamer auf einem UP-System ist. Ich habe gesehen, dass Ubuntu in unstable auch AVM-Firmware und Kernelsourcen (für 2.6.17) bereit stellt. Da ich bei Ubuntu keine außerplanmäßigen Patche gefunden habe, gehe ich davon aus, dass die Treiber bei Ubuntu auch nicht funktionieren werden ... Die Firmware fürfte für die B1- und C4-Karten von AVM sein, für die es ja OpenSource-Treiber im Kernel gibt. Lediglich die BinaryOnly-Treiber von AVM kommen nicht mit den SMP-Kerneln klar. Man hat einfach am Locking und anderen Dingen gespart, so dass das Ding früher oder später einfacher stehenbleibt, hart. S° -- Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/ -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
* Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-09-2006 15:28]: Wobei ich gerade sehe, das du eine DSL-Karte benutzt. Hier gibt es kein Equivalent, aber ich rate dir eh, ein externes Modem und eine normale Ethernetkarte zu benutzen. Das ist schmerzfreier und flexibler. Es gibt schon noch ein paar Anbieter für interne DSL-Modem. Ich kann aber günstig ein Netgear DG834GB bekommen. Mal sehen, ob das Ding was taugt. Die Firmware fürfte für die B1- und C4-Karten von AVM sein, für die es ja OpenSource-Treiber im Kernel gibt. Da ist auch Firmware für die DSL-Karten dabei. Es gibt da 2 Pakete: avm-fritz-kernel-source und avm-fritz-firmware - beide Ubuntu (restricted). Was da genau noch drin ist, weiß ich nicht genau. ;-) Gruss Uwe signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-09-2006 15:28]: Wobei ich gerade sehe, das du eine DSL-Karte benutzt. Hier gibt es kein Equivalent, aber ich rate dir eh, ein externes Modem und eine normale Ethernetkarte zu benutzen. Das ist schmerzfreier und flexibler. Es gibt schon noch ein paar Anbieter für interne DSL-Modem. Mag sein. Ich sehe nur nicht den Sinn darin, wenn man von ein Gerät weniger mal absieht. Allerdings sehe ich mehr Probleme, die durch so eine Karte entstehen (Software-unabhängig) als man damit lösen könnte. Vor allem die fehlende Flexibilität würde mich dabei nerven. Aber das muss jeder selbst wissen. Die Firmware fürfte für die B1- und C4-Karten von AVM sein, für die es ja OpenSource-Treiber im Kernel gibt. Da ist auch Firmware für die DSL-Karten dabei. Es gibt da 2 Pakete: avm-fritz-kernel-source und avm-fritz-firmware - beide Ubuntu (restricted). Was da genau noch drin ist, weiß ich nicht genau. ;-) Da die Binary-Only NVidia-Treiber bei Ubuntu auch in Restricted sind, kann es gut sein, das dort auch die Binary-Only Treiber von AVM mit drin sind. Ob sie funktionieren und dass auch stabil, kann ich allerdings nicht vorhersehen. S° -- Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/ -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 13:41]: Alternativ könntest du natürlich auch einen eigenen Kernel bauen. Das wollte ich vermeiden. Ich warte jetzt bis Dezember, mal sehen ob dann noch SMP im normalen Kernel aktiviert ist. Dann kann ich mir immer noch was überlegen. Du glaubst doch nicht im Ernst, dass jeder seine AVM-Hardware in die Tonne tritt? _Ich_ habe das in größerem Stil getan, bzw. bei der Neuanschaffung gleich auf Karten mit z.B. HFC-Chip gesetzt. Weiß jemand zufällig, ob es einen Kernel 2.6.17-2-k7 (ohne SMP) und extra einen Kernel 2.6.17-2-k7-smp (mit SMP) geben wird? In Sid ist nichts zu sehen, bei 2.6.16-2-k7 gibt es diese Trennung noch. Bei Ubuntu sind die Kernel mittlerweile alle mit SMP kompiliert, weil der Kernel automatisch erkennt, ob es nur ein UP-System ist und dann andere Code-Pfade wählt, so dass ein SMP-Kernel nicht mehr langsamer auf einem UP-System ist. Daher hat man sich wohl entschieden, alle Kernel gleich für SMP zu bauen, da man so die Anzahl der Kernel-Pakete reduzieren konnte. S° -- Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/ -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Von: Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 13:41]: Alternativ könntest du natürlich auch einen eigenen Kernel bauen. Das wollte ich vermeiden. Ich warte jetzt bis Dezember, mal sehen ob dann noch SMP im normalen Kernel aktiviert ist. Dann kann ich mir immer noch was überlegen. Du glaubst doch nicht im Ernst, dass jeder seine AVM-Hardware in die Tonne tritt? @Uwe: Kann es sein, das Du nur einfach das falsche Modul verwendest? Wenn ich das richtig sehe, brauchst Du fcdsl22.ko, das ist für Kernel mit SMP, aber nur für Single Prozessor Maschinen. hth Reinhold
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Uwe Kerstan schrieb: Hallo, ich habe ein kleines Problem mit dem Kernel in Etch. Zur Vorgeschichte: ich habe mit Kernel 2.6.16-2-k7 kein Problem. Ich kann den Treiber für meine Fritzcard DSL problemlos damit compilieren und benutzen. Dieser Kernel ist ohne SMP. Update heute auf Kernel 2.6.17-2-k7 - die Treiber für die Fritzcard (fcdslsl) compilieren problemlos. Ich kann das Modul auch laden. Nach capiinit kommt es dann zur Kernelpanic. Dieser Kernel kommt mit SMP! Dadurch wird wohl auch irgendwas mit SMP in das Modul fcdslsl eincompiliert, was die ganze Kiste einfrieren läßt. Ich brauche kein SMP für meine Single-CPU-Maschine, von SMP steht auch nichts in der Paketbeschreibung. Soll das SMP bleiben oder ist das ein Irrtum? Was mache ich jetzt? Gruss Uwe Hi! definitiv brauchst du keinen Kernel mit SMP. Es ist ein Kernel im APT haben, der einfach nur 2.6.17-2-k7 (linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7_2.6.17-8_i386.deb) heisst Oder einfach Selbstbauen! :-) MfG Christian
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
* Christian Fröse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 09:01]: ... Ich brauche kein SMP für meine Single-CPU-Maschine, von SMP steht auch nichts in der Paketbeschreibung. definitiv brauchst du keinen Kernel mit SMP. DAS weiß ich selber. Es ist ein Kernel im APT haben, der einfach nur 2.6.17-2-k7 (linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7_2.6.17-8_i386.deb) heisst linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7_2.6.17-8_i386.deb ist HIER mit SMP! Gruss Uwe signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
* Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 02:17]: Karte wegwerfen, denn der Hersteller hat den Treiber explizit so erstellt, damit er nicht mit SMP funktioniert. Du meinst, ich soll meine Hardware wegschmeißen, nur weil der normale K7-Kernel jetzt per default mit SMP kommt? Soll ich mir auch eine SMP-Maschine kaufen? ;-) Gruss Uwe signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
Uwe Kerstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 02:17]: Karte wegwerfen, denn der Hersteller hat den Treiber explizit so erstellt, damit er nicht mit SMP funktioniert. Du meinst, ich soll meine Hardware wegschmeißen, nur weil der normale K7-Kernel jetzt per default mit SMP kommt? Soll ich mir auch eine SMP-Maschine kaufen? ;-) Nein, du sollst deine Karte wegwerfen, weil der Hersteller nicht mehr unterstütztenswert ist. Alternativ könntest du natürlich auch einen eigenen Kernel bauen. S° -- Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://www.svenhartge.de/ -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: [etch] Kernel K7 SMP?
* Sven Hartge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-2006 13:41]: Alternativ könntest du natürlich auch einen eigenen Kernel bauen. Das wollte ich vermeiden. Ich warte jetzt bis Dezember, mal sehen ob dann noch SMP im normalen Kernel aktiviert ist. Dann kann ich mir immer noch was überlegen. Du glaubst doch nicht im Ernst, dass jeder seine AVM-Hardware in die Tonne tritt? Weiß jemand zufällig, ob es einen Kernel 2.6.17-2-k7 (ohne SMP) und extra einen Kernel 2.6.17-2-k7-smp (mit SMP) geben wird? In Sid ist nichts zu sehen, bei 2.6.16-2-k7 gibt es diese Trennung noch. Gruss Uwe signature.asc Description: Digital signature
