Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-02-15 Thread Marcus Franke
I never had any problems with one of my 3com 905er cards..
they are just a bit expensive compared to those cards, mentioned
before..

Marcus

Hanno Böttcher wrote:
 
 I have very good experiences with the Realtek (8139) chipset which works
 without any parameters (PCI) with the module installation at bootup, very
 easy to setup.
 
 Hanno
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
 Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:31 PM
 Subject: Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?
 
  mike polniak wrote:
  
   Jeff Weatherford wrote:
Bryan Carpenter wrote:
 
  I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
  card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
  Debian 2.2.17 install. I've tried a Netgear FA312
  and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
  to be easy to set up. I did try getting the tulip
  driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
  to compile and use. I'm willing to spend money to get a
  card that will either just be seen and set up by
  the default install, or else at most need to have
  one of the standard optional modules chosen that
  are offered early in the Debian install.
  
   Have done half a dozen Debian installs with D-Link DFE-530TX+
   and all kernels from 2.16 up recognize the card. It uses rtl8139 or
   rtl8139.tOO drivers. Standard module for 2.2.17 is rtl8139.
   Kernel 2.2.18 has both modules set.
   This card is fast and inexpensive. I have never had any problems
   installing it with Linux.
  
  I have had good luck with the Linksys LNE2000 (Ether16 Lan), which works
  seamlessly with the ne2000 driver, once you take it out of PnP mode.  It
  is still being sold (by McGlen, at least), but it is an ISA card that
  only does 10M.
 
 
  --
  To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
All true wisdom is found on T-Shirts



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-02-14 Thread Keith G. Murphy
mike polniak wrote:
 
 Jeff Weatherford wrote:
  Bryan Carpenter wrote:
   
I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
Debian 2.2.17 install. I've tried a Netgear FA312
and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
to be easy to set up. I did try getting the tulip
driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
to compile and use. I'm willing to spend money to get a
card that will either just be seen and set up by
the default install, or else at most need to have
one of the standard optional modules chosen that
are offered early in the Debian install.
 
 Have done half a dozen Debian installs with D-Link DFE-530TX+
 and all kernels from 2.16 up recognize the card. It uses rtl8139 or
 rtl8139.tOO drivers. Standard module for 2.2.17 is rtl8139.
 Kernel 2.2.18 has both modules set.
 This card is fast and inexpensive. I have never had any problems
 installing it with Linux.
 
I have had good luck with the Linksys LNE2000 (Ether16 Lan), which works
seamlessly with the ne2000 driver, once you take it out of PnP mode.  It
is still being sold (by McGlen, at least), but it is an ISA card that
only does 10M.



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-02-14 Thread Hanno Böttcher
I have very good experiences with the Realtek (8139) chipset which works
without any parameters (PCI) with the module installation at bootup, very
easy to setup.


Hanno

- Original Message -
From: Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?


 mike polniak wrote:
 
  Jeff Weatherford wrote:
   Bryan Carpenter wrote:

 I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
 card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
 Debian 2.2.17 install. I've tried a Netgear FA312
 and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
 to be easy to set up. I did try getting the tulip
 driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
 to compile and use. I'm willing to spend money to get a
 card that will either just be seen and set up by
 the default install, or else at most need to have
 one of the standard optional modules chosen that
 are offered early in the Debian install.
 
  Have done half a dozen Debian installs with D-Link DFE-530TX+
  and all kernels from 2.16 up recognize the card. It uses rtl8139 or
  rtl8139.tOO drivers. Standard module for 2.2.17 is rtl8139.
  Kernel 2.2.18 has both modules set.
  This card is fast and inexpensive. I have never had any problems
  installing it with Linux.
 
 I have had good luck with the Linksys LNE2000 (Ether16 Lan), which works
 seamlessly with the ne2000 driver, once you take it out of PnP mode.  It
 is still being sold (by McGlen, at least), but it is an ISA card that
 only does 10M.


 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-02-13 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Bryan Carpenter wrote:
 
 I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
 card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
 Debian 2.2.17 install.  I've tried a Netgear FA312
 and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
 to be easy to set up.  I did try getting the tulip
 driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
 to compile and use.  I'm willing to spend money to get a
 card that will either just be seen and set up by
 the default install, or else at most need to have
 one of the standard optional modules chosen that
 are offered early in the Debian install.
 
I just noticed this and would like to share my recent experience, in the
hope that it helps someone else.

I also had a Linksys LNE100TX card, and built from the Debian 2.2.17
source package, and told it to use the 'tulip' driver, building it into
the kernel.  The new kernel didn't find the card.  Tried building it
with tulip as a module; that didn't help.

Got the latest source for tulip from www.scyld.com, and tried gcc'ing it
on its own.  Had trouble with it finding libraries, like modversions.h,
as I recall.  

The solution that worked was:

1. Putting all the .c and .h files in the /usr/src/linux/drivers/net
directory 
2  Using 'make menuconfig' to tell it to generate 'tulip' as a module
3. Modifying /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/Makefile to build 'pci-scan' as
well as 'tulip'
4. 'make-kpkg binary --revision whatever' (which I customarily do) to
create my binary kernel package.

Built like a charm.

Modified /etc/modules.conf to have 'alias eth0 tulip'.

'insmod pci-scan'
'insmod tulip'

And the card was recognized, and 'ifconfig eth0 up' worked.

This seems a very easy and Debian-nice way to get the card up and
running.  

It's probably not quite kosher to put pci-scan in the drivers/net
directory, since it can pertain to other devices, but what the hey...

I'll try building the stuff static someday when I get the time.



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-02-13 Thread Jeff Weatherford

Bryan Carpenter wrote:

 I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
 card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
 Debian 2.2.17 install. I've tried a Netgear FA312
 and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
 to be easy to set up. I did try getting the tulip
 driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
 to compile and use. I'm willing to spend money to get a
 card that will either just be seen and set up by
 the default install, or else at most need to have
 one of the standard optional modules chosen that
 are offered early in the Debian install.



Personally I use 3com cards because they are supported by everything, 
everywhere...as I don't believe in Intel as a company, even though their 
nic cards are supported everywhere.  :-)


When I built my last debian (potato) box, I used a 3com 3c905b (apx $30-$35 
US), and compiled the support for the card as a module (the package to 
support this card is 3c590).  It has worked from the start and has never 
quit on me yet :-)


The package is available in the list of nics during the install process.

hope that helps some,
jeff



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-02-13 Thread mike polniak
Jeff Weatherford wrote:
 Bryan Carpenter wrote:
  
   I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
   card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
   Debian 2.2.17 install. I've tried a Netgear FA312
   and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
   to be easy to set up. I did try getting the tulip
   driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
   to compile and use. I'm willing to spend money to get a
   card that will either just be seen and set up by
   the default install, or else at most need to have
   one of the standard optional modules chosen that
   are offered early in the Debian install.

Have done half a dozen Debian installs with D-Link DFE-530TX+
and all kernels from 2.16 up recognize the card. It uses rtl8139 or
rtl8139.tOO drivers. Standard module for 2.2.17 is rtl8139.
Kernel 2.2.18 has both modules set.
This card is fast and inexpensive. I have never had any problems
installing it with Linux.
 

-- 

~~~



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-02-13 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:17:14AM -0600, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
 Bryan Carpenter wrote:
  
  I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
  card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
  Debian 2.2.17 install.  I've tried a Netgear FA312
  and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
  to be easy to set up.  I did try getting the tulip
  driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
  to compile and use.  I'm willing to spend money to get a
  card that will either just be seen and set up by
  the default install, or else at most need to have
  one of the standard optional modules chosen that
  are offered early in the Debian install.

Missed the original note...

My only purchase of a card has been an SMC 1211TX EZCard 10/100.  Uses the
8139too driver directly.  Works with no problems, no fuss, no mess...

Can't say whether the driver is part of a standard kernel image, though.

$12 (?) at Compusa. 

Kenward
-- 
It is not so very important for a person to learn facts.  For that he
doesn't really need a college education, for he can learn them from
books.  The value of an education in a liberal arts college is not the
learning of many facts but the training of the mind to thinking--something
that cannot be learned from books. Albert Einstein



Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-01-10 Thread Bryan Carpenter

I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
Debian 2.2.17 install.  I've tried a Netgear FA312
and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
to be easy to set up.  I did try getting the tulip
driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
to compile and use.  I'm willing to spend money to get a
card that will either just be seen and set up by
the default install, or else at most need to have
one of the standard optional modules chosen that
are offered early in the Debian install.

I would like a 10/100 10BaseT card that uses
an efficient architecture so it doesn't load
the processor unduly, and I also want it to have
good WinME and Win2K drivers.

I notice that the Debian install just sees my Adaptec
SCSI card, and I'd like to get a network card that
is similarly mainstream so as to be easily set up.

Is there a currently-mainstream card that meets the
above requirements yet sells for not much above
the $60 range?  I'm willing to spend more for the
convenience, but I'd like to keep it in that range
if possible.

Thanks in advance for any help!

Bryan Carpenter
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



RE: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-01-10 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry

On 10-Jan-2001 Bryan Carpenter wrote:
 I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
 card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
 Debian 2.2.17 install.  I've tried a Netgear FA312
 and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
 to be easy to set up.  I did try getting the tulip
 driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
 to compile and use.  I'm willing to spend money to get a
 card that will either just be seen and set up by
 the default install, or else at most need to have
 one of the standard optional modules chosen that
 are offered early in the Debian install.
 

odd, I find pci network controllers to be uniformly easy.

insert card
turn on machine
insmod driver # in your case tulip

Generally if this is not working, you have hardware conflicts (too many cards,
or perhaps cards trying to be on similar settings).



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-01-10 Thread Philipp Schulte
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:20:18PM -0700, Bryan Carpenter wrote: 

 I would like a 10/100 10BaseT card that uses
 an efficient architecture so it doesn't load
 the processor unduly, and I also want it to have
 good WinME and Win2K drivers.

I am satisfied with my Realtek 8139 cards. They are very cheap but
reliable for me and according to several benchmarks they are faster
than much more expensive 3Coms.
They just work and don't cause any trouble.
Setting it up is really simple. There exists an kernel-module which
just has to be loaded (if it was built) and it should work.
Phil



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-01-10 Thread mike
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:20:18PM -0700, Bryan Carpenter wrote:
 I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
 card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
 Debian 2.2.17 install.  I've tried a Netgear FA312
 and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
 to be easy to set up.  I did try getting the tulip
 driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
 to compile and use.  I'm willing to spend money to get a
 card that will either just be seen and set up by
 the default install, or else at most need to have
 one of the standard optional modules chosen that
 are offered early in the Debian install.
 
 I would like a 10/100 10BaseT card that uses
 an efficient architecture so it doesn't load
 the processor unduly, and I also want it to have
 good WinME and Win2K drivers.
 
Well i just did a couple of installs using a D-Link 
DFE-530TX+. You can load the rtl8139.o module and config
the network during the actual install, so you are ready to
d/l pks from the net after setting up the base system.
This is a very good 10/100 NIC with Win2k drivers.
These cards have recently been on sale for $10-20. Just
plug it in and go. It even has wake-on-lan if your m/b
supports it.
The rtl8139 driver is already compiled as a
module in Debian 2.17 kernel.



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-01-10 Thread Rogerio Brito
On Jan 10 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
 odd, I find pci network controllers to be uniformly easy.

Indeed. The days of terror of ISA cards and conflicts are
almost gone. For instance, my new motherboard doesn't even
come with ISA slots anymore.

Anyway, I have had good luck with el-cheapo NICs like my
Realtek RTL8139. And it works like a charm, even though it is
not like an Intel card (which I've been told are the best ones
regarding performance and machine load).


[]s, Roger...

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-01-10 Thread Rogerio Brito
On Jan 11 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
 I am satisfied with my Realtek 8139 cards.

Yes, I use this card and I'm also happy with it.

 They are very cheap but reliable for me and according to several
 benchmarks they are faster than much more expensive 3Coms.

Well, I've never seen NIC benchmarks, but I'm actually quite
interested (especially if they are Linux based). Could you
provide some references, please?

 They just work and don't cause any trouble.

Ditto.

 Setting it up is really simple. There exists an kernel-module which
 just has to be loaded (if it was built) and it should work.

Yes. BTW, in recent kernels (like 2.2.18) there are actually
two modules for this card. One of them is Donald Becker's
rtl8139 and the other is Geff Garzik's 8139too. I'm only
familiar with Becker's (as it works wonderfully here).


[]s, Roger...

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



NIC Performance Linux (was: Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?)

2001-01-10 Thread Rogerio Brito
On Jan 10 2001, Rogerio Brito wrote:
 On Jan 11 2001, Philipp Schulte wrote:
  I am satisfied with my Realtek 8139 cards.
  They are very cheap but reliable for me and according to several
  benchmarks they are faster than much more expensive 3Coms.
 
   Well, I've never seen NIC benchmarks, but I'm actually quite
   interested (especially if they are Linux based). Could you
   provide some references, please?

Well, the only thing that I could find about NIC benchmarks
and the mentioned cards was:

http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2000-November/010570.html

Other comments and/or benchmarks are welcome as this is
something that I'd like to learn more about.


[]s, Roger...

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Rogerio Brito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-01-10 Thread D-Man
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 04:20:18PM -0700, Bryan Carpenter wrote:
| I'm a newbie asking for help as to which network
| card to buy that will just be seen by a standard
| Debian 2.2.17 install.  I've tried a Netgear FA312
| and a Linksys LNE100TX rev. 4.1, but neither seems
| to be easy to set up.  I did try getting the tulip
| driver from scyld.com, but it seems to require munging
| to compile and use.  I'm willing to spend money to get a

I have the Linksys card and have had no trouble with it at all.

The tulip driver should already be compiled as a module.  

# add this line to /etc/modules.conf
alias eth0 tulip 


Better than putting that in modules.conf, put it in
/etc/modutils/aliases and run update-modules.

I would highly recommend the Linksys card since it has worked so well
for me out-of-the-box and is only $24 US.  (compare to 3Com at ~ $90
US).  It even comes with the driver (tulip.c) on the floppy in the
package.  I didn't have any trouble compiling it -- the first time I
tried I didn't understand modules so I built it statically.  The
standard kernel source dist has tulip.c in it, I simply copied the
newer one from the disk to the source tree and rebuilt.

-D



Re: Suggestions for an easy-to-setup 10/100 net card?

2001-01-10 Thread Philipp Schulte
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 10:30:33PM -0200, Rogerio Brito wrote: 

  They are very cheap but reliable for me and according to several
  benchmarks they are faster than much more expensive 3Coms.
 
   Well, I've never seen NIC benchmarks, but I'm actually quite
   interested (especially if they are Linux based). Could you
   provide some references, please?

Yes, I do have some reference. In it's #16 in 1999 the german
computer-technology magazine c't (http://www.heise.de) printed some
benchmarks of 25 different NICs with different OSes.
If you are interested I can mail them privately to you (because they
contain jpegs).

  Setting it up is really simple. There exists an kernel-module which
  just has to be loaded (if it was built) and it should work.
 
   Yes. BTW, in recent kernels (like 2.2.18) there are actually
   two modules for this card. One of them is Donald Becker's
   rtl8139 and the other is Geff Garzik's 8139too. I'm only
   familiar with Becker's (as it works wonderfully here).

I used the old module till the release of 2.4.0
Both work fine.
Phil